PHILOSOPHY IM 25 SYLLABUS IM SYLLABUS (2019)

Similar documents
PHILOSOPHY AM 25 SYLLABUS AM SYLLABUS (2018)

EXAMINERS REPORT AM PHILOSOPHY

UNIVERSITY OF MALTA THE MATRICULATION EXAMINATION ADVANCED LEVEL

UBC - OKANAGAN. COURSE OUTLINE Summer 2013 PHILOSOPHY BIOMEDICAL ETHICS

Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT

NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Course Syllabus. Course Description: Objectives for this course include: PHILOSOPHY 333

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Ethics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL 56. Research Integrity. 1 Unit

Undergraduate Calendar Content

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Φ The Department of Philosophy

acting on principle onora o neill has written extensively on ethics and political philosophy

Philosophy HL 1 IB Course Syllabus

Introduction to Ethics MWF 2:30-3:20pm BRNG 1230

PHILOSOPHY. Written examination. Monday 15 November 2004

Philosophy Courses-1

EL CAMINO COLLEGE Behavioral & Social Sciences Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy, Summer 2016 Section 2510, MTWTh, 8:00-10:05 a.m.

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Philosophy Courses-1

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 20118/19. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

The Exeter College Summer Programme at Exeter College in the University of Oxford. Good Life or Moral Life?

Altruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Ethics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

Wednesday, April 20, 16. Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Ethics

Department of Philosophy

Categorical Imperative by. Kant

Honours Programme in Philosophy

COURSE OUTLINE. Philosophy 116 (C-ID Number: PHIL 120) Ethics for Modern Life (Title: Introduction to Ethics)

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

ETHICAL THEORIES. Review week 6 session 11. Ethics Ethical Theories Review. Socrates. Socrate s theory of virtue. Socrate s chain of injustices

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Short Title: HIST INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY

PHILOSOPHY-PHIL (PHIL)

UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES CERTIFICATE IN PHILOSOPHY (CERTIFICATES)

(naturalistic fallacy)

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Instructor contact information

Robert Kiely Office Hours: Monday 4:15 6:00; Wednesday 1-3; Thursday 2-3

SYLLABUS. Department Syllabus. Philosophy of Religion

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM Northeast College NOLN

AS Philosophy and Ethics

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

Instructor: Justin Smith Once the course begins, use the Instructor Here icon inside the course.

Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Topic III: Sexual Morality

Units. Year 1 Unit 1: Course Overview. 1:1 - Getting Started 1:2 - Introducing Philosophy SL 1:3 - Assessment and Tools

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

PHILOSOPHY 2 Philosophical Ethics

Philosophy Catalog. REQUIREMENTS FOR A MAJOR IN PHILOSOPHY: 9 courses (36 credits)

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1

good philosopher gives reasons for his or her view that support that view in a rigorous way.

Introduction to Ethics

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011

Department of Philosophy

Instrumental reasoning* John Broome

PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Morality in the Modern World (Higher) Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (Higher)

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

POLI 27 Ethics and Society

The Search for Meaning PHIL 180 University Studies Program. Course Outline

Bioethics An Introduction

Criticizing Arguments

Subject Overview Curriculum pathway

Course Coordinator Dr Melvin Chen Course Code. CY0002 Course Title. Ethics Pre-requisites. NIL No of AUs 3 Contact Hours

PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY

OTTAWA ONLINE PHL Basic Issues in Philosophy

16RC1 Cahana. Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories. Alex Cahana. Introduction

Josh Parsons MWF 10:00-10:50a.m., 194 Chemistry CRNs: Introduction to Philosophy, (eds.) Perry and Bratman

PHILOSOPHY. Written examination. Monday 17 November 2003

ADVANCED SUBSIDIARY (AS) General Certificate of Education Religious Studies Assessment Unit AS 7. assessing

EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007

-Department of Philosophy, University of Guelph - PHIL : INTRODUCTORY PHILOSOPHY: CLASSIC THINKERS

PL-101: Introduction to Philosophy Fall of 2007, Juniata College Instructor: Xinli Wang

PL 406 HISTORY OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY Fall 2009

PHILOSOPHY 144, Moral Issues (Makinster) ~ Saturday mornings, Room MS 117. Section 70 ~ 10:50 1:30. Spring Why Study Philosophy?

Hoong Juan Ru. St Joseph s Institution International. Candidate Number Date: April 25, Theory of Knowledge Essay

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1

SPS103 LAW AND ETHICS

Course Syllabus Ethics PHIL 330, Fall, 2009

Department of Philosophy

A Major Matter: Minoring in Philosophy. Southeastern Louisiana University. The unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates, B.C.E.

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

PHILOSOPHY (413) Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D.

CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) PHIL Courses. Philosophy (PHIL) 1

No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships

4AANA001 Greek Philosophy I Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

The Biological Foundation of Bioethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Transcription:

PHILOSOPHY IM 25 SYLLABUS IM SYLLABUS (2019)

IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy Philosophy IM 25 Syllabus (Available in September) 1 Paper (3 hrs) 1. Introduction Since the time of the ancient Greeks, philosophy has developed into a discipline which asks fundamental questions about all areas of human activity, while seeking to offer plausible answers to such questions. Past philosophers lived in particular historical and cultural circumstances, but their questions and answers have inspired many views of how human beings understand, interpret and change themselves and the reality around them. At Intermediate Level, Philosophy gives students the opportunity to develop costructive thinking skills. It invites them to explore how Philosophy relates to and complements other subjects such as the Sciences, Languages, Psychology, Sociology, History, Art and Literature, Law and Politics, Religion, Computing, Marketing and Communications. Through the presentation of historical, theoretical and practical considerations, this syllabus is designed to illustrate how the contribution of philosophy lies precisely in giving meaning to how people, as individual persons and societies, live these different realities. Studying Philosophy strengthens the development of a deeper, critical reflection on practical issues in everyday life. 2. Aims The Intermediate Level course in Philosophy will enable students to: a. gain knowledge and understanding of Philosophy through consideration of some important philosophical issues and approaches to problems; b. develop a rigorous approach, both critical and constructive, to the study of Philosophy and the nature of arguments; c. practise and enhance their abilities to construct, develop and maintain clear and coherent argument; d. acquire skills in comprehension, interpretation, analysis and evaluation that facilitate the development of independent thinking, based on a critical examination of the evidence and rational argumentation. These skills are applicable in the study of other academic subjects and in reflection on other important aspects of human experience. 3. Objectives Based on the above aims, students should be able to: a. define/describe the main problems raised by the philosophers presented and their b. tentative answers. c. deal confidently with structured questions concerning logic. d. identify the philosophical, existential and ethical concerns of the topics presented e. and their continued relevance. f. present well-structured and logically sound arguments in essay form. g. show a thorough knowledge of the content covered and take a critical stance where necessary. 2

4. Method of Assessment IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy The Assessment consists of a three (3) hour written paper, divided into two (2) sections. Section A covers Module 1 (Logic and Reasoning) of the syllabus and carries 30% of the marks for this paper. Candidates will answer three (3) out of four (4) questions. Section B covers Module 2 (Ethics and Society). Candidates will have to answer a compulsory question and another question from a choice of three (3). Each answer will be in essay form and carries 35% of the mark of this paper. 5. Content Module 1: Logic and Reasoning Part1: Introduction to Logic 1. Deduction and Induction 2. Truth and Validity 3. Fallacies: i. Argument from Ignorance ii. Appeal to Inappropriate Authority iii. Argument Ad Hominem iv. Begging the Question v. Appeal to Emotion vi. Appeal to Pity vii. Appeal to Force viii. Irrelevant Conclusion Part 2: Propositional Logic 1. Elementary Propositions 2. Complex propositions 3. Logical Junctors: i. Negator ii. Conjunctor iii. Adjunctor v iv. Disjunctor v. Subjunctor vi. Bi-Subjunctor 4. Valid Arguments 5. Logically True Propositions Part 3: Formal Logic 1. The Implication < 2. The Equivalence >< 3. Rules of Inference: i. Modus Ponens ii. Modus Tollens 3

IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy 4. Valid Forms and Admissible Rules: i. Reflexivity ii. Transitivity iii. Symmetry iv. Generalization and Instantiation v. Partial Replacement Rule Module 2: Ethics and Society Part 1: The Classical Model: How Should One Live? 1. The Sophists: Truth is Relative i. Protagoras Moral Relativism; Man is the Measure of All Things. ii. Gorgias Moral Nihilism; Moral Truth is Fiction 2. Socrates: Moral Optimism i. Socrates Love for the Truth ii. Socratic Method (Dialectic) iii. Knowledge of the Truth and Right Actions. 3. Aristotle: Practical Ethics to Achieve Self-Fulfilment i. Definition of Man as a Rational Animal ii. The Proper Function of Human Beings iii. The Pursuit of Virtue and the Golden Mean 4. Epicurus: Practical Ethics as Pleasure Seeking i. Material Definitions of Human Nature ii. Fear of Death and Superstitions iii. Epicurean Pleasure-Seeking Principle Part 2: The Modern Model: How Should One Act? 5. Kantianism: Doing Good for its Own Sake i. Virtue and Happiness Faring Well and Doing Right ii. Kant and the Good Will iii. Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives iv. Pure Practical Reason and the Moral Law v. Universalizability Test 6. Utilitarianism: The Best Outcome i. Utility and the Greatest Happiness Principle ii. Act and Rule Utilitarianism iii. Utilitarianism and Consequences iv. Does the End Justify the Means? Part 3: The Contemporary Model: How Might One Live? 7. Nietzsche: Should One Be Moral? i. The Crisis of Morality 4

ii. iii. IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy A New Morality Beyond Good and Evil The Will to Power and the Overman 8. Sartre and Existentialism: Freedom and Choice i. Sartre and Radical Freedom ii. Anguish and Bad Faith iii. Acting in Good Faith iv. The Creation of Value Part 4: The Internet and Society: How Might We Act? 9. The Internet and Ethical Values i. The Role of Morality in Cyberspace ii. Ethical Values for the Digital Age 10. Privacy and Cyberspace i. Definition and Theory of Privacy ii. Personal Information on the Internet iii. Consumer privacy on the Internet iv. Case Study Newport Electronics Part 5: Life and Death Issues: How Might We Regulate? 11. Reproductive Technology i. IVF - ET ii. Surrogacy iii. Cloning iv. Applying Moral Theories 12. Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide i. Deciding Life and Death: Voluntary and Non-voluntary Active Euthanasia Voluntary and Non-voluntary Passive Euthanasia Physician-Assisted Suicide ii. Autonomy, Mercy and Harm iii. Applying Moral Theories 5

6. Recommended Texts IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy Graham, G., Theories of Ethics (New York: Routledge, 2011) Friġġieri, J., In-Nisġa tal-ħsieb, vols 1 and 2 (Malta: Media Centre 2000, 2007) Riolo, V., Introduction to Logic (Malta: MUP 2001) 7. Further Reading Copi, I., Introduction to Logic 8th ed (New York: Macmillan, 1990) Spinello, R., Cyberethics (Boston: Jones and Bartlett 2006) Vaughin, L., Bioethics (Oxford: OUP 2010) 8. Online Sources Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://iep.utm.edu 6