JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Similar documents
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

FILED AUG Q APPELLANT RODERICK G. FORIEST NO KA-2025 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

FILED AUG IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPCO py APPELLANT MICHAEL BENARD MILLER NO.2007-KA-1994 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

STATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010

STATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

OPINION BY v. Record No CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS December 13, 2018 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY

Decided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder

STATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA COA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

E-Filed Document May :58: KA COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC J.B.PARKER, Appellant, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0999 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KENAN ALLEN FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

Rosalyn Ann Sanders v. State of Florida

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert Hanson,

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Supreme Court of Florida

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

Center on Wrongful Convictions

MARLON DWAYNE WILLIAMS OPINION BY v. Record No CHIEF JUSTICE HARRY L. CARRICO June 7, 1996 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

>> THE NEXT CASE IS STATE OF FLORIDA VERSUS FLOYD. >> TAKE YOUR TIME. TAKE YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.

David Dionne v. State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEL YNN DELSHAE PITTMAN

STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,757 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> GOOD MORNING TO BOTH OF YOU. THE LAST CASE THIS WEEK IS CALLOWAY V.

Supreme Court of Florida

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

COX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# DOB: 10/06/59

Dana Williamson v. State of Florida SC SC

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Alabama. # Concealed Handgun Permit Holder: Tykee Smith PENDING. Date: August 2, People Killed: 1

Indictment THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNTl [False Declarations Before Grand Jury]

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006

AT THE BEGINNING, DURING OR AFTER. SO IF IF SOMEONE IS STEALING SOMETHING, AS YOUR CLIENT HAS BEEN ALLEGED TO HAVE DONE, AND IS CAUGHT AND IN THE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011

SWORN STATEMENT of JAMES ARNOLD HUDGINS. Monday, July 30, 2001

No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY APPELLEES SECOND MOTION AND BRIEF FOR RECONSIDERATION

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY Log # U #09-39

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2009-Ohio-5692.] Court of Appeals of Ohio. vs. DONNELL SMITH JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED

SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

(Witness sworn.) THE COURT: Let's proceed. NAT TOVAR, having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,945 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, ROBERT DALE RHOADES, Appellee.

Girding for new trial in 1993 Lockmiller murder

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your. 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

>> HEAR YE HEAR YE HEAR YE, THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR. GIVE ATTENTION, YOU SHALL BE

Norman Blake McKenzie v. State of Florida SC >> THE NEXT CASE ON THE COURT'S AGENDA IS MCKENZIE VERSUS STATE. >> MR. QUARLES LET'S HEAR ABOUT

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

Marshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida

Transcription:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0800-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY; LISA L. BLOUNT SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSISSIPPI BAR NO. _ OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS 39205-0220 TELEPHONE; (601) 359-3680

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE... 1 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS... 2 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 7 ARGUMENT... "... 8 CONCLUSION... 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 12

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES STATE CASES Bell v. State, 910 So.2d 640, 646 (Miss.Ct.App.2005)... 9 Craft v. State, 970 So.2d 178 (Miss.App.,2007)... 9 Evans v. State, 725 So.2d 613, 680-81 (Miss.1997)... 9 Jackson v. State, 594 So.2d 20, 25 (Miss.1992)... 8 Kelly v. State, 783 So.2d 744, 754 (Miss.Ct.App.2000)... 9 McCoy v. State, 820 So.2d 25, 31 (Miss.Ct.App.2002)... 8 Reynolds v. State, 784 So.2d 929, 932(Miss.2001)... 8 Strahan v. State, 729 So.2d 800, 806 (Miss. 1998)... 9 Theodore v. State, 798 So.2d 465, 470 (Miss. 2001)... 9 Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123, 126 (Miss.1987)... 9 ST ATE STATUTES Miss.Code. Ann. 97-3-19(1)(a) (Rev.2006)... ;... 9 Miss.Code Ann. 97-3-19(2)(e)... 1 Miss.Code Ann. 97-37-5... 1 11

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0800-COA ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal against a judgment of the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi wherein ajury convicted Michel Jerome Williams for the capital murder of Latanya Thompson and Calvin Jennings during commission of a house burglary in violation of Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-19(2)( e), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-37-5. Williams received two concurrent life sentences in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections without the possibility of parole for the capital murder charges and a concurrent three year sentence for the firearm charge. (CP 74-79; RE 12-17; T 454; 460). 1

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Latanya Thompson ("Latanya") and Michel Jerome Williams ("Williams") had been a couple for several years when Latanya broke up with Williams. Williams admitted he was a very jealous man. (T. 361-63). Three or four months before her death, Latanya moved into a rental house on Maria Drive with her three children, her best friend Tawanda Hedge and Tawanda's children. (T. 171, 184). Even after the breakup Williams continued to visit Latanya and their three children at her house. (T. 185-86). Latanya's brother, Zachary Thompson ("Zachary"), moved in with his sister a few weeks before her death. (T. 148-49). In the early morning hours of November 20, 2005, Williams was driving to Latanya's house when he saw an unknown car parked at her house. (T. 261). Williams testified he stopped by Latanya's to tell her how much he loved her. (T 355, 359). According to Williams, he stopped and knocked on the front door. When no one answered he looked in Latanya's bedroom window and saw a man laying beside Latanya in bed. ( T. ). Zachary testified that while sleeping on the living room sofa, he awoke to a knock at the door. (T 153). Latanya told Zachary it was Williams and not to open the door. (T 155-56, 186). The knocks got louder and then Williams kicked in the door. Id. Williams entered the home with his gun in hand. (T. 158). Williams and Latanya tussled, he pushed her out of the way and then entered her bedroom. (T. 157). Zachary heard the first gun shot; Calvin Jennings ("Calvin") ran out saying "he shot me" and then crossed the street. (ld.) Zachary went after Jennings, and heard two more shots. (lei). As he went back into the house; Michael ran out with the gun and left in his car. (ld.). Zachary found his sister on the floor behind her bedroom door. (T. 159). Zachary ful1her testified that while Williams visited the house on occasion, Latanya never gave Williams a key to the house, nor did she invite Williams to come to the house the night of the 2

shooting. (T. 170). Tawanda Hedge ("Tawanda") was the next witness for the State. Tawanda corroborated Zachary's rendition of the night's events. (T 173-175). Tawanda and Latanya moved in the rental house three or four months prior to the shooting. She also testified that she woke up to a banging on the door. She got up when she heard a gun shot, opened her bedroom door and saw Calvin run out. She then heard Williams shoot Latanya and saw him exit Latanya's bedroom looking for Calvin. (T. 176-77). Tawanda grabbed Williams trying to throw him off to keep him from going into Tawanda's room. (T. 177). He pointed a gun at her and asked if Calvin were in her room. (Id.). Williams went to his car, placed the gun in the trunk and left (Id.). Zachary and Tawanda both testified that Latanya had only recently started seeing Calvin; this was the first time he had been to their home. It was undisputed that the two gunshot victims were unarmed when shot. At the time of their deaths Jennings was dressed in boxer shorts and Latanya in clothing. Shamika Whitlock, Latanya's neighbor, testified that an unknown man woke her by knocking at her side door and then the front door. He told her he'd been shot and needed help. Afraid, she didn't open the door but called the police for him. (T. 189-94). Officer Keith Dowd testified that at 3 :27 a.m., upon responding to a "shots fired" call, he found the wounded Jennings outside of Whitlock's home. (T. 216-17). Jennings told him Latanya's ex-boyfriend shot him. (Id.). Investigator Eneke Smith, a crime scene investigator, testified to the condition of the crime scene and photographs thereof, evidence recovered, and the murder weapon. (T. 221-51). Sargent Eric Smith with the Jackson Police Department testified to his investigation of the case, his interview with witnesses and to his interview with Williams. (T. 251-84). Smith testified Williams turned himself into the police and gave a statement. (T. 256, 259-63). 3

Raphael Ward ("Ralph"), Williams' cousin, testified pursuant to the State's subpoena. On the night of the shootings, Ward's girlfriend telephoned him to tell him about the shootings and asked him to go to Latanya's. (T. 196). Ralph found Latanya dead at her house. (T. 197). Ralph called Williams on his cellular telephone approximately 30 to 40 minutes after the shootings. (T. 98,201-02). Ralph gave police a statement a few ours after the shootings. Ralph testified Williams told him "He said he was driving past Tanya's house and saw her boyfriend's car outside. He said he kicked the door in and went in and shot." (T. 201). "He couldn't take her being with anyone else." (T. 201, 382). Ralph testified that Williams and Latanya had been broken up a couple of months. (T. 204). Ralph also testified Williams had been dating other women since the breakup. During the conversation, Williams asked Ralph "How's the other guy?" (T.204). Ralph testified he did not lie to the police when he gave them a statement after the shootings. Dr. Stephen Hayne performed the autopsies on both shooting victims. He testified that each died of massive internal bleeding due to gunshot wounds. (T 298,308). Latanya sustained one shot to the chest and two shots to the head, any of which would have been sufficient to kill her. (T. 306). Jennings sustained one fatal shot to the chest area. (T.298-308 ). Williams testified in his own defense. According to Williams, he started dating Latanya in 1998 or 1999. They lived together and had three daughters. (T. 344). Approximately a year before her death, Latanya moved away from Williams. (T.348). Three or four months before the shooting Latanya and Tawanda moved in the rental house on Maria Drive. At trial, Williams admitted: "I was kind of jealous. I ain't going to lie. I was too jealous, a lot jealous. And I believe that was driving her away from me because she just always complained about ifshe even talked to a dude or something or a guy or something I'd be - you know, [' d kind of get upset or whatever. And I don't want to say nothing that ain't true because she ain't here to defend herself and I wouldn't do her like that. But that's just how it was. I was real jealous. But I loved that girl. You know I really loved her. But --" 4

(Id.) On cross examination Williams admitted that when he entered the home he was angry; he intentionally pulled the trigger when he shot Calvin. (T. 398). Williams admitted that when he shot at Calvin the first time he missed, but hit him in the chest the second time. (T. 403). Williams further admitted if Calvin had stayed in the room and not run he probably would have just shot him. (T. 400). After being shot, Calvin fled the room. Williams turned on the bedroom light and went in search of him. Williams went into the living room and asked Zach where Calvin went. (T 401). Then Williams went looking for him in the kitchen and then came upon Tawanda with his gun in his hand. (T. 402). Tawanda was crouching down in fear. (T. 402). Williams turned his attention back to Latanya in the bedroom when he couldn't find Calvin. (T. 408) Latanya was standing behind her bedroom door when Williams shot her in the chest. (T. 409). The shot knocked Latanya off her feet and she fell to the ground. Latanya said "Mike, you're killing me." (Id.). Williams told her "Baby, I'm sorry." (T. 261) and then shot her two times in the head. (T. 420, 425). Williams testified he wasn't mad at Latanya when he shot her, he was hurt. (T. 410-11). After shooting Latanya, Williams left the house with his gun in hand, went to his car placed the gun in the'trunk and drove off. Williams testified after he left Latanya's house, he went to a friend's home, intending, he testified, "to do something crazy." (T. 378). At trial, the defense proffered the testimony of Williams' mother, Beverly Williams ("Beverly"). She testified that Williams entered her apartment early the morning of the shooting with the gun placed to his temple and tried to fire the revolver. Beverly believes the gun failed to fire through divine intervention. (T. 321-23). An official from the Hinds County Circuit Clerk's office testified as to Williams' prior conviction for attempted car jacking, making him a convicted felon. 5

The jury found Williams guilty of the capital murder of Latanya Thompson and Calvin Jennings during commission of a house burglar and possession of a fireann by a convicted felon. Williams received two life sentences without the possibility of parole for the capital murder charges and a concurrent three year sentence for the firearm charge. After the denial of post trial motions, Williams appealed raising the following issues: I. The trial court abused its discretion to the fatal prejudice of Mr. Williams when it excluded evidence of his attempted suicide in the hours immediately following the shootings. II. The verdict of the jury was insufficient as a matter of law because the State failed to prove deliberate design on the part of Mr. Williams, an essential element of the crime. 6

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The trial court properly refused admission in evidence of Williams' attempted or contemplated suicide. Williams' state of mind in the hours after he shot and killed Latanya Thompson and Calvin Jennings was totally irrelevant as to whether he acted with deliberate design or in the heat of passion. The question of whether a defendant committed murder or manslaughter is ordinarily a question to be resolved by the jury. The jury heard the evidence and determined Williams acted with deliberate design and convicted him of murder. There was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. 7

ARGUMENT I. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY EXCLUDED EVIDENCE OF WILLIAMS' ATTEMPTED SUICIDE. Williams contends in his first assignment of error that the trial court erred in excluding Beverly Williams' testimony concerning his attempted suicide and his statements to police and to Ralph that he contemplated suicide. Rule 401 of the Mississippi Rules of Evidence states that relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. The trial court properly excluded the attempted suicide testimony as being irrelevant. The excluded testimony was of Williams' state of mind after the shootings occurred. According to Rule 402 of the Mississippi Rules of Evidence, for evidence to be admissible it must be relevant. "The admissibility and relevancy of the evidence are within the discretion of the trial court and, absent an abuse of that discretion, the trial court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal." McCoy v. State, 820 So.2d 25, 31(~ 15) (Miss.Ct.App.2002) (citing Reynolds v. State, 784 So.2d 929, 932(~ 7) (Miss.20D I )). Nevertheless, even if an admission of evidence was in error, it is not cause for reversal unless it results in prejudice 01' harm. Id (citing Jackson v. State, 594 So.2d 20, 25 (Miss. 1992)). The cases cited by Appellant in his brief are inapplicable to the case sub judice. II. THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE JURY'S VERDICT. In his next assignment of error, Williams contends that the verdict of murder was not supported by the evidence. Williams claims the state failed to prove the element of deliberate design beyond a reasonable doubt, as required for a murder conviction. The question ofwhether a defendant has committed murder or manslaughter is ordinarily a 8

question to be resolved by the jury. Strahan v. State, 729 So.2d 800, 806(~ 24) (Miss.1998); Kelly v. State, 783 So.2d 744, 754(~ 27) (Miss.Ct.App.2000). In this case, the jury was instructed on both manslaughter and murder. The jury concluded that Williams committed the murder. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, all evidence supporting the guilty verdict is accepted as true, and the State must be given the benefit of all reasonable inferences that can be reasonably drawn from the evidence. Bell v. State, 910 So.2d 640, 646(~ 16) (Miss.Ct.App.2005). Furthermore, it is well-settled law that the jury determines the credibility of witnesses and resolves conflicts in the evidence. Evans v. State, 725 So.2d 613, 680-81 (~293) (Miss.1997). Deliberate design murder consists of "[t)he killing of a human being without the authority oflaw by any means or in any manner... when done with deliberate design to effect the death of the person killed, or of any human being." Miss.Code. Ann. 97-3-l9(l)(a) (Rev.2006). In Windham v. State, 520 So.2d 123, 126 (Miss.1987), the Mississippi Supreme Court held "Deliberate" always indicates full awareness of what one is doing, and generally implies careful and unhurried consideration of the consequences. "Design" means to calculate, plan, contemplate... deliberate design to kill... may be formed very quickly, and perhaps only moments before the act of consummating the intent. In Theodore v. State, 798 So.2d 465, 470(~ 21) (Miss.200l), the supreme court affirmed a murder instruction that read, "[a) deliberate design cannot be formed at the very moment of the fatal act, however, the deliberate design need not exist... for any definite time... but if... it exists... but for an instant before the fatal act, this is sufficient deliberate design to constitute the offense of Murder." Id. Whether Williams had the deliberate premeditated intent to kill Calvin and Latanya before he shot them is a classic jury question between deliberate design and heat of passion. See Craft v. 9

State, 970 So.2d 178 (Miss.App.,2007). When considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational juror could conclude that Williams acted not out of the heat of passion, but with deliberate design to kill Calvin Jennings and Latanya Thompson. The evidence showed that Latanya had broken up with Williams. She was moving on with her life. Williams saw an unknown car parked at her house in the middle of the night. He admittedly was ajealous person. He told Ralph ifhe couldn't have Latanya, nobody else could. When no one would answer his banging at her door, he peeped through her bedroom window and saw Latanya with another man. He went back to his car for his gun. He acted with the intent of shooting Calvin. Williams broke into the house by kicking down the door. He pushed Latanya out of the way and went for Calvin in the bedroom. He testified he intentionally pulled the trigger to shoot Calvin, and then sought him out. He went from room to room looking for him. Williams' actions were deliberate, calculated and with malice. Although he was angry, he was not in an uncontrollable rage. Williams admitted that when he returned to Latanya in the bedroom he wasn't angry at her at that time, he was hurt. He said, if Calvin had not run, he probably would not have shot Latanya. Williams actions in shooting Latanya three times were deliberate and intentional. Shooting her when she was on the ground begging for her life was malicious. Williams had plenty of time to contemplate shooting Calvin and Latanya. Thus, a jury could find that Williams acted with deliberate design. The jury had all the evidence before it and made an informed decision based on the facts before it. In reviewing the evidence on appeal and in the light most favorable to the State, one can reasonably find Williams guilty of capital murder. This issue is without merit. 10

CONCLUSION Based upon the arguments presented herein as supported by the record on appeal, the State would ask this reviewing court to affirm the jury's verdict and sentence of the trial court. Respectfully submitted, JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ~s:g. ~~ LISA L. BLOUNT SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSISSIPPI BAR N~ OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS 39205-0220 11

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Lisa L. Blount, Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, do hereby certify that I have this day mailed, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE to the following: This the 6th day of February, 2009. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205-0220 TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3680 Honorable W. Swan Yerger Circuit Court Judge Post Office Box 327 Jackson, MS 39205 Honorable Robert Shuler Smith District Attorney Post Office Box 22747 Jackson, MS 38225-2747 Virginia L. Watkins, Esquire Attorney At Law Post Office Box 23029 Jackson, MS 39225 4\,ro- ~. & lrjc LISA L. BLOUNT SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 12