What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing. Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate

Similar documents
Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

Figures removed due to copyright restrictions.

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate

The Manitoba Speech and Debate Association. A Brief Guide to Debate

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

Writing the Persuasive Essay

ROLES OF TEAMS AND SPEAKERS

DEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false.

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Opposition Strategy. NCFA Rookie Debate Camp

Course Syllabus. Course Description: Objectives for this course include: PHILOSOPHY 333

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

The Great Debate Assignment World War II. Date Assigned: Thursday, June 11 Date Due: Wednesday, June 17 / 32 marks

Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman. Trenton Merricks. Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, I.

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Philosopher s World Cup

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

In this paper I will critically discuss a theory known as conventionalism

Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

USING LOGOS WISELY. AP Language and Composition

Evidential arguments from evil

Statement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion

Debate and Debate Adjudication

PRELIMINARY QUIZ OPTIMISTS AND PESSIMISTS OPTIMISTS AND PESSIMISTS THE REACTIVE ATTITUDES OPTIMISTS AND PESSIMISTS 10/18/2016

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit

8/12/2011. Facts (observations) compare with. some code (standard) resulting in a. Final Conclusion. Status Quo the existing state of things

Resolved: Connecticut should eliminate the death penalty.

Atheist Responses To Religious Arguments By Frank Butcher READ ONLINE

Straw man fallacy examples in politics 2015

Rationality and Truth. What is objectivity?

Speaker Roles POI. Refutation. Equity and Etiquette

Causation Essay Feedback

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance).

Refutation Paragraphs

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May

I Have A Dream. New Far East Book Six Lesson Four 黃昭瑞. Judy Huang 台南女中

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Valley Bible Church Theology Studies. Inerrancy

Jesus and Apologetics

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

Common Logical Fallacies

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

Relativism and the Nature of Truth

DEFEASIBLE A PRIORI JUSTIFICATION: A REPLY TO THUROW

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

This handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your philosophy papers.

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Debate British Parliament -Roles, Rules & Regulation. UQP1331 Basic Communication

Williamson s proof of the primeness of mental states

EBSCO Publishing. Student Success Tools

Grab a book! Of Mice and Men. Final Essay. I can follow a process to plan, write, edit, revise, and publish an essay

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Science And Creationism READ ONLINE

Argumentation Techniques

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

CSC290 Communication Skills for Computer Scientists

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

This document consists of 10 printed pages.

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Realism and the success of science argument. Leplin:

INFORMATIONAL ROBOT HAND PLAN (facts or details)

Moore on External Relations

In Defense of Culpable Ignorance

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Tallinn EUDC Judges Briefing

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

!1 of!8 Nest+M Debate. Nest + M Debate

A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Bible Study on Christian Apologetics

Transcription:

What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate

What is Debate? Formal debates are structured exchanges of ideas which adhere to pre-determined rules intended to be fair. Different Kinds of Formal Debate: Classroom debates Elections and Parliament Thesis Defense Public debates; e.g. Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham Interviews

Parliamentary Debate Terminology: Resolutions/Motions The subject of a debate. An example might be This House would abolish capital punishment. Models What is This House? That is defined in the model. Models should explain the terms of the debate, who the debaters represent, and how the government team wishes to carry out the resolution. Government (or Proposition) The government team is in favour of the resolution, and their first speaker is expected to clearly present a model. Opposition The opposition team is against the resolution.

You try: Identify the resolution, model, and the side of the following resolution: Ladies and Gentlemen, we as the United States of America stand in favour of decriminalizing music piracy. We want to remove all the punishments for copying, sharing, and downloading music online

Parliamentary Debate You may find yourself disagreeing with the side you're defending, but that's part of the fun! The two sides will alternate in giving speeches for and against the motion.

Speech Structure Basic Version: 1. Begin by signposting. Describe your position, and state your main arguments. 2. Present each argument separately, illustrating them with examples and evidence, and showing how they supports your team. 3. Address the arguments of the opposing side, explaining why they are wrong. 4. Summarize your main points, and why your side is stronger in the round.

Essay Structure What does a case look like? Organizing your papers the same way you would a debate provides a structural core that you can then develop into a paper it helps keep everything organized. Resolution: Def n: 1) Defined Term 2) Defined Term Arguments: 1) tagline - argument 2) tagline - argument 3) tagline - argument Caseline:

Argumentation At its most fundamental level, an argument consists of 4 things: Statement (What you're proving) Explanation (Why it is true) Example (When it worked) Link back (How does this prove your point) Must tell judge/room why something is true Connect the logical links that justify your conclusion Keep asking why, until you can t ask the question

Argumentation Arguments not Examples o Example should be used to back up argument o Example is not an argument on it s own Internally Consistent o Arguments should not contradict each other Relevance o You have a limited amount of time o Focus on the arguments that prove your case

Logical Fallacies; errors that render arguments invalid Slippery Slope - If you don t study you won t get into college, so you won t get a good job, you ll end up flipping burgers for life -If we assume that A is true, then B will follow, and C will follow, leading to D. -If you don t prove that A leads to B, leads to C, etc., then the claim is fallacious Appeal to authority -An argument is true/false because an authority (person, book, website, etc.) says so. Only if the authority is reputable is the claim true - Head researcher at UBC says X ; therefore we should all believe X Straw figure fallacy -The straw figure is a weaker, distorted version of your opponents argument that can be easily refuted. -Refuting the straw figure of an argument isn t actually addressing the original argument, it s misrepresentative

Argumentation Consider Different Kinds of Arguments Social Political Economic Regional Moral (SPERM)

Rebuttal/Refutation What is Rebuttal? o Disproving or undermining the arguments of your opponents. How do you make a rebuttal? o Sum up their argument (avoid misrepresentation). o Indicate why they are wrong and explain. Attack the branches, the trunk, or the roots?

Rebuttal/Refutation Strategies to rebuttal: o Show their argument is inconsistent with their case o Show their argument is irrelevant to their case o Show their argument is insufficiently proved o Show their assumptions to be wrong o Make a more persuasive counter-argument o Last Resort: mitigate the effects - damage control

Your turn! Practice Resolution What arguments can you make in favour of this? Opposed to this?

Your Turn! Critique the Show Debate What arguments were unpersuasive, and why? Consider the strategies for rebuttal.

Presentation Signposting o Say what you're going to say o Remind us where you are in your speech o At the end, summarize what you said o Makes it easy for judge to follow you Crutch Words o Like umm. These words give your mind time to catch up with your speech o Not worst thing, but there are smoother choices: Silence, on that point, furthermore

Presentation Mannerisms o Eye contact o Speak loud and clear o Hand gestures o Avoid monotone Nerves!! Be Creative! o Having a unique style often helps judges remember you and your arguments in the round

Activity Time to Debate

Want to learn more? UBC Debate Society (UBCDS) Tuesday 5pm BUCH D218 Friday 4pm BUCH A203 www.ubcdebate.com