MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS

Similar documents
INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

Curriculum Guide for Pre-Algebra

There are various different versions of Newcomb s problem; but an intuitive presentation of the problem is very easy to give.

The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox

Bayesian Probability

Boxes and envelopes. 1. If the older child is a girl. What is the probability that both children are girls?

Module 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests

Consider... Ethical Egoism. Rachels. Consider... Theories about Human Motivations

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 6b Reasoning

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 21

Classroom Voting Questions: Statistics

Probability Foundations for Electrical Engineers Prof. Krishna Jagannathan Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Betting on God: Pascal, Probability Theory and Theology. nevertheless made surprising contributions to the field of religious philosophy.

CHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED?

Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

Content Area Variations of Academic Language

I thought I should expand this population approach somewhat: P t = P0e is the equation which describes population growth.

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

MITOCW watch?v=ogo1gpxsuzu

Segment 2 Exam Review #1

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

1/17/2018 ECE 313. Probability with Engineering Applications Section B Y. Lu. ECE 313 is quite a bit different from your other engineering courses.

Logical Omniscience in the Many Agent Case

Nigerian University Students Attitudes toward Pentecostalism: Pilot Study Report NPCRC Technical Report #N1102

Why Christians should not use the Kalaam argument. David Snoke University of Pittsburgh

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

Prisoners' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS

Cursed? On the Gambler s Fallacy, Confirmation Bias, and the Case of Mini War Gaming s Quirk

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

175 Chapter CHAPTER 23: Probability

SUMMARY COMPARISON of 6 th grade Math texts approved for 2007 local Texas adoption

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

Ramsey s belief > action > truth theory.

CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I. Introduction to Probability

Project: The Power of a Hypothesis Test

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Philosophy 148 Announcements & Such. Inverse Probability and Bayes s Theorem II. Inverse Probability and Bayes s Theorem III

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

INTRODUCTION. THE FIRST TIME Tocqueville met with the English economist Nassau Senior has been recorded by Senior s daughter:

PAGLORY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

Baumann on the Monty Hall problem and single-case probabilities

Degrees of Belief II

Math 10 Lesson 1 4 Answers

Artificial Intelligence I

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

Jeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN

CAN TWO ENVELOPES SHAKE THE FOUNDATIONS OF DECISION- THEORY?

THOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim)

Module - 02 Lecturer - 09 Inferential Statistics - Motivation

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

THE UNCOMFORTABLE QUESTION OF EVIL

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?

Final Paper. May 13, 2015

A short introduction to formal logic

= (value of LEAVE if rain x chance of rain) + (value of LEAVE if dry x chance of dry) = -20 x x.5 = -9

Personal Identity Paper. Author: Marty Green, Student # Submitted to Prof. Laurelyn Cantor in partial

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

MITOCW watch?v=a8fbmj4nixy

CHAPTER 16: IS SCIENCE LOGICAL?

VAGUENESS. Francis Jeffry Pelletier and István Berkeley Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Kierkegaard is pondering, what it is to be a Christian and to guide one s life by Christian faith.

Psychoddities. Can Golden Balls save the world?

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

They asked me what my lasting message to the world is, and of course you know I m not shy so here we go.

READ LAMENTATIONS 3:23-24 DAY 4 READ GALATIANS 6:9 DAY 1 THINK ABOUT IT: THINK ABOUT IT: WEEK ONE 4 TH 5 TH

POLS 205 Political Science as a Social Science. Making Inferences from Samples

Philosophy of Love, Sex, and Friendship WESTON. Arguments General Points. Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion.

Introduction Chapter 1 of Social Statistics

The Decline of the Traditional Church Choir: The Impact on the Church and Society. Dr Arthur Saunders

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 5d God

ABSTRACT of the Habilitation Thesis

Robert Nozick s seminal 1969 essay ( Newcomb s Problem and Two Principles

NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking

Board of Ordained Ministry 2017 Clergy Evaluation

Bounded Rationality. Gerhard Riener. Department of Economics University of Mannheim. WiSe2014

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

Philosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction

NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1

Rational and Irrational Numbers 2

Class #14: October 13 Gödel s Platonism

studyıng phılosophy: a brıght ıdea

Transcription:

MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS (1) Birthday Paradox (TAKEN): This question was briefly mentioned in Chapter 13: How many people must be in a room before there is a greater than 50% chance that some pair of people in the room share a birthday? This is a classically counterintuitive probability puzzle, to which most people provide wildly inaccurate guesses. You could carefully answer this question, explain the solution in your own words, provide some history, and maybe discuss a generalization. In particular, what if you replace pair of people with group of three people? (I m not totally sure how to do it, it might be cool to try or estimate.) (2) Party Problem: How many people must be in a room before there is guaranteed to be a group of three mutual acquaintances or a group of three mutual strangers? Four is not enough, because there could be two pairs of friends where each person has never met the two people in the opposite pair, so any group of three has at least one acquainted pair and one unacquainted pair. Is five enough? Is it ever possible to guarantee at least one such group of three people? This question has a definitive answer with an elegant explanation, and turns out to be a special case of an important result known as Ramsey s Theorem in the mathematical research area of graph theory. You could give the answer, and the proof, and discuss some things related to the history of the problem, generalizations (how about four instead of three?), or whatever else you find. (3) The Monty Hall Problem (TAKEN): This is the game with the three doors, one with a car and two with gag prizes, that we discussed and played in class. It is loosely based on the game show Let s Make a Deal and named after its original host. In addition to recalling the details of the game, and carefully explaining in your own words why switching doors is a beneficial strategy, you could delve into the history of the problem, specifically how it sparked a great deal of controversy when the correct explanation was published in Parade magazine. 1

2 MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS (4) Pascal s Wager (TAKEN): This one would likely have a bit less mathematical discussion and a bit more history, etc., depending on your approach. The content, and the underlying flaws in logic (think Cat in the Hat t-shirts), of Pascal s Wager were discussed in Chapter 12. To summarize the assertion: if you follow the Christian religion, and the Christian religion is accurate, then the payoff is infinite, so any positive probability that the Christian religion is accurate, no matter how small, mathematically justifies any cost in following the religion. In addition to including the details we have already discussed in your own words, I think it would be cool to hear more about the history of this line of reasoning, and how it has popped up over the centuries in literature, pop culture, etc. Also, if you had some personal thoughts or opinions on the matter, you could totally share those as well. (5) The Prosecutor s Fallacy: This is something we discussed in a fair amount of detail: the misinterpretation that conditional probabilities are the same when the two events switch roles. For example, the chance you ll test positive for a disease given that you re healthy is different from the chance you re healthy given that you tested positive. While we dove into this pretty well, there is still plenty more to be said and plenty of real-world examples (not silly things made up by me) to explore. In particular, Jordan mentioned in the footnotes that there is a book titled Math On Trial by Corlie Colmez and Leila Schneps, that treats several such examples in detail. I think it would be cool if you could recall the core concept in your own words and discuss some examples, history, et cetera, from that book or any other source you uncover. (6) Simpson s Paradox (TAKEN): You and I flip coins, some on Saturday, some on Sunday. On Saturday, a higher percentage of your flips land heads than mine. The same is true on Sunday. Surely, then, for the weekend as a whole, a higher percentage of your flips landed heads than mine, right? Not necessarily! The key issue is that I never told you that we each flipped the same number of coins each day. This counterintuitive reversal phenomenon has been well-studied, and there are lots of realworld examples to delve into. A careful explanation, with some history and several examples, could make for a nice project.

MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS 3 (7) Logistic Population Model: Very early in the semester, when we were discussing linearity and nonlinearity, we had some gentle discussions about how populations can grow over time. The most nuanced picture we drew involved rapid, exponential growth at the beginning, followed by a leveling off based on availability of space, resources, etc. These are the basics of what is known as a logistic model, which is in particular a good model for global human population, and as your final project you could delve into this in more detail. This would involve some gentle discussions relating to calculus (no harder than what we discussed in class during some of those days) that I could guide you through. (8) The Statistical Revolution in Sports (TAKEN): Over the last twenty years or so, the kinds of mathematical logic, probability, expected value calculations, regression, etc., that we have discussed in class, as well as more sophisticated statistical analysis, have been embraced by the world of sports on a remarkably large scale. You may be familiar with the book and movie Moneyball, which chronicled the success of the Oakland Athletics baseball team in using statistical considerations that were novel at the time, but now every professional sports team has a dedicated analytics department. A few small examples: major league baseball teams now value on-base percentage and slugging percentage way more than the more traditionallyrevered RBI and batting average; NBA basketball teams shoot WAY more three-point shots than they used to; NFL teams throw WAY more passes than they used to, all because of mathematical and statistical considerations. Those are just a few scattered thoughts, this a pretty broad topic, you could take any number of approaches here; you could take a very historical angle, you could go heavy on the mathematical content, or anything in between.

4 MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS (9) The Law of Large Numbers and the Gambler s Fallacy: We discussed both of these things in class. The law of large numbers says, for example, that if you flip a coin more and more times, then, with greater and greater probability, the proportion of totl flips that are heads will get closer and closer to 50%. However, this does NOT say that if the first 10 flips are heads, that the coin will then favor tails in an effort to balance out the total. This misinterpretation is referred to as the gambler s fallacy. You could take a shot at formulating the law of large numbers a bit more precisely, and maybe discuss some history, psychology, and real-life examples of both of these concepts. (10) The Card Game Set (TAKEN): There is a popular card game called Set which uses a deck consisting of 81 cards varying in four features: number (one, two, or three); symbol (diamond, squiggle, oval); shading (solid, striped, or open); and color (red, green, or purple). A set is any group of three cards that are either ALL the same of ALL different in each of the four categories. For example, one red solid diamond, one red solid squiggle, and one red solid oval would form a set, because the three cards have all the same number, all the same color, all the same shading, and all different shapes. This game gives rise to some interesting mathematical questions. For example, what is the maximum number of cards that can be on the table without having ANY sets? This question is deeply connected with one of our in-class activities, as well as one of the biggest recent results in my research area, which was proven by, among others, Jordan Ellenberg, the author of our book. I would love to see you explain some interesting things about Set in your own words, and we could even play a game together as a class!

MATH 1000 PROJECT IDEAS 5 (11) The Prisoner s Dilemma (TAKEN): Two partners commit a major bank robbery together, get arrested, and are separately interrogated. The district attorney s office does not have sufficient evidence to convict the pair for the robbery, but only for a lesser weapons charge, so the DA hopes to extract a confession, and offers the following deal to each partner: If both partners confess, then each partner receives a slightly reduced 9-year prison sentence for the robbery. If one partner refuses to confess while the other partner confesses, then the confessing partner can testify against the non-confessing partner to avoid prison time, while the non-confessing partner receives the full 10-year prison sentence or the robbery. If neither partner confesses, then the partners each receive the 1-year sentence for the weapons charge. If both partners fully understand all of these potential outcomes, and they act totally rationally in their own self interest, what choices will they make? This might seemed contrived, but the analysis of this type of scenario, and the seeming paradox of decision making that comes with it, have a lot of real-life applications. Research into this question could lead you toward biology, economics, philosophy, who knows! (12) An Infinity of Infinities (TAKEN): Are there more fractions than there are whole numbers? Are there more irrational numbers than there are rational numbers? How can we compare the sizes of two sets if they are both infinite? In the book, Jordan very briefly mentioned this line of questioning, which was made firm by the work of Georg Cantor in the second half of the nineteenth century. Jordan comments that these ideas, once seen as beyond the scope of mathematics, are now standard material for undergraduate math majors, though it does sort of blow their mind. I think I can do him one better and explain these ideas to you in my office in an hour or so, well enough that you can do some research including some history, write things up, and explain them to the class in your own words.