Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being

Notes Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being 1. Ernst Cassirer, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation, Kant-Studien, 36 (1931), 17 (translation by the present writer). 2. Marjorie Grene, Martin Heidegger (London: Bowes & Bowes, 1957), 66 7. 3. Karl Löwith, Heidegger: Denker in dürftiger Zeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1960), 78n (translation by the present writer). 4. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 3; [Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Ingtraud Görland, Vol. 25 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977), 4 5]. Hereafter, references to the original text are given in parentheses after the page number of the translation. 5. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Raymund Schmidt (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1976), A 314/B 370. 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 2 3 (3 4). 7. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. Richard Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 141; [Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, 4th edition (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1973), 195]. 8. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (196). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 10. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 11. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 143 (198). 12. Thomas Langan, Foreword, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, by Martin Heidegger, trans. J.S. Churchill (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962), xii. 13. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1971), 6. 14. Heidegger at times makes this principle quite explicit. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 64 (93). 15. Claude Piché, La Schématisme de la Raison Pure: Contribution au dossier Heidegger-Kant, Études Philosophiques, 1986, 83 (translation by the present writer). 16. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time, 12 13. For a similar view, see William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967), 159. 17. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 178

Notes 179 18. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 35 (40). 19. Ernst Cassirer, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation, 16. 20. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiii). 21. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning), trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1999) 176, 217, 317; [Beiträge zur Philosophie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 65 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1989), 250, 308, 451]. 22. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy, 246 (351). 23. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), 8; [Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1979), 9]. See also Martin Heidegger s History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), 3; [Prologomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, Vol. 20 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1979), 3 4]. 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 25. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 4 (6). 26. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 28 (32). 27. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10). See also History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, 2 (2 3). 28. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Michael Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), 56; [Metaphysische- Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz, ed. Klaus Held, Vol. 26 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 70]. 29. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 30. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 19, cf. 20 (21; cf. 22). 31. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 8 9 (10). 32. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 10 11 (12 13). 33. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 144 (154). 34. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. Albert Hofstadter (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), 222; [Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 24 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1975), 317]; cf. also Being and Time, 9 (10 11). 35. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 42 (44 45); cf. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (296) and Martin Heidegger, What is a Thing? trans. W.B. Barton, Jr and Vera Deutsch (South Bend: Regnery/Gateway, 1967), 63; [Die Frage nach dem Ding (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1975), 48]. 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 129 30, B 168 9. 37. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 147/B 187. 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 166. 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (82 3). 40. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 16 (18). 41. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 23 (26).

180 Notes 42. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 20 (23). 43. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiv). If this passage is intended to date the discovery of the importance of the schematism, Heidegger was surely forgetful when he wrote this fourth preface (1973), since he had already lectured in the winter semester of 1925 26 on the crucial importance of the schematism. 44. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 21 (24). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 15 (167). 46. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 4 (5). 47. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 46 (62). 48. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 149 50 (160). 49. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 113 (155). 50. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 60 (84 5). 51. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (195). 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B 29. 53. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxvi. 54. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxix. This and subsequent translations from Kant are by the present writer except where noted. All emphases within quotations throughout this work are from the original source. 55. See Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 117 (162). 56. This is to ignore entirely Kant s conception of the free play of the faculties, which he developed in the Critique of Judgement. Heidegger pays little attention to this work, although it might be argued that here Kant provides his own account of the role of freedom in transcendence. 57. Martin Heidegger, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164 5 (210). 58. Martin Heidegger, On the Essence of Ground, trans. William McNeill, in Pathmarks, ed. William McNeill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 126; [ Vom Wesen des Grundes, in Wegmarken (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 162]. 59. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 118 (162); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 189 90 (279). 60. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 109 12 (150 5). 61. Henri Declève, Heidegger et Kant (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), 35 (translation by the present writer). 62. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvi xvii (xiii xiv). Heidegger had already made this change of mind public in 1950 in the foreword to the second edition: Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 1. Laying the Foundations of Metaphysics in Ontology 1. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 7 9 (8 12); and What is Metaphysics? in Pathmarks. 2. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10 11); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (16 17); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 45 46 (66).

Notes 181 3. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 22. 4. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5 (8); see also Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 9 11 (12 14); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 4 6 (8 9). 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 11 12 (15 16). 7. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 18 (26). (The original is previously concealed is here made grammatically consistent as was previously concealed.) 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (26). 9. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xiii; cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 22 (31). 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 5. 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 16 17 (23). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 17 (23). 13. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 7 (11). 14. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (27). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (27). 16. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (28). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (28). 18. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 332 (363). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (29). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 24 (34). 22. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 24 (35). 23. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenology and Theology, trans. James G. Hart and John C. Maraldo, in Pathmarks, 53 4; [ Phänomenologie und Theologie, in Wegmarken, 67]; see discussion in Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, ed. Walter Biemel, Vol. 21 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976), 16 17. 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 26 (38). 25. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 8 9 (10). 26. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 27. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36).

182 Notes 28. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 6 (36 7). 29. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 26 (37); cf. Being and Time, 42 (45). 30. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B 33. 31. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (82). 32. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (83); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 15 (21). 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57, 65 (83, 94). 34. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B 33. 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 60 (87); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 19 (25). 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 24. 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 27 9 (40 2). 38. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 35 (51). 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 33 5 (48 51). 40. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xvi. 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 38 (55). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 38 (56); cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (12). 43. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 39 40 (57 9); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (16); Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 128 (180 1). 44. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 845/B 873; see also Immanuel Kant über die von der König. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin für das Jahr 1791 ausgesetzte Preisfrage: Welches sind die wirklichen Fortschritte, die die Metaphysik seit Leibnitzens und Wolffs Zeiten in Deutschland gemacht hat?, ed. Gerhard Lehmann, in Vol. 20 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 260. 45. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 247/B 303. 46. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 113. 47. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (196). 48. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 64 (92). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 62 (90). 50. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B 29. 51. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 63 (91 2); Heidegger quotes from Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 835/B 863. 52. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 201 (218 19). 53. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 63 (88 9). Ronald P. Morrison has correctly noted the importance of Heidegger s attacks on representationalism in his interpretation of Kant ( Kant, Husserl, and

Notes 183 Heidegger on Time and the Unity of Consciousness, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 39, No. 2 (1978), 182). 54. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (21). 55. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 16 (22). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 30 1 (44). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 13 14 (19). 58. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 14 (20). 59. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 64 5, 330 (68 9, 360 1). 60. Friedrich H. Jacobi, Vol. 2 of Werke, ed. R.F. Köpen (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968), 304 5. 61. G.W.F. Hegel, Logik, Vol. 4 of Sämtliche Werke, ed. H. Glockner (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1965), 603 8. 62. Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Will und Vorstellung, Vols 2 and 3 of Sämtliche Werke, ed. A. Hübscher (Wiesbaden: F.U. Brockhaus, 1972), Vol. 2: 494 8, Vol. 3: 216. 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 67 8 (98); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 22 3 (30 1), Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164 (209), and On the Essence of Ground, in Pathmarks, 116 (146). 64. Ronald P. Morrison, Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger on Time and the Unity of Consciousness, 195. 65. Robert W. Burch, Heidegger and the Bounds of Sense, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 6, No. 1 (1975), 27. 66. Grace A. de Laguna, On Existence and the Human World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), 86 7. 67. Sandra B. Rosenthal and Patrick L. Bourgeois, Lewis, Heidegger and Ontological Presence, Philosophy Today, 27, No. 4/4 (1983), 292 4. 68. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 24, 63 (27, 67 8). 69. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 22 (30). 70. Jules Vuillemin, L héritage Kantien et la révolution Copernicienne (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954), 257. 71. Mikel Dufrenne, Heidegger et Kant, Revue de la métaphysique et de morale, 54 (1949), 5; La Notion d a priori (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959), 29. 72. Henri Declève, Heidegger et Kant, 129. 73. William F. Vallicella, Kant, Heidegger and the Problem of the Thing in Itself, International Philosophical Quarterly, 23 (1983), 40. 74. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 68 (99); cf. Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164 (209 10). 75. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 541/B 569, A 558/B 586. 76. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 252, B 307. 77. William Vallicella points out that Heidegger s rejection of the concept of the thing in itself gives the appearance an independence that is incompatible with its status as a representation. This is correct in so far as the concept

184 Notes of the appearance needs the purely negative concept of the thing in itself as a corrective. However, Vallicella goes too far when he claims that Heidegger thus transforms appearances into things in themselves. (William F. Vallicella, Kant, Heidegger and the Problem of the Thing in Itself, 39 40.) 2. The Transcendental Aesthetic and the Unity of the Faculties 1. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 40 (59). 2. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 58 (84). 3. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 70 1 (102). 4. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 79 (84 5); see also 80 1, 103 (86, 111). 5. Cf. Chapter 1 of the present work. 6. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 20/B 34. 7. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 23/B 38, A 30/B 46. 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 71 (103). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 72 (104). 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 51/B 75. 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 85 (123). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 85 (123). 13. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 266/B 322; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 86 (124). 14. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 97 (125 7). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 (127 8); see also Heidegger s Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, 274. 16. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 9 (128). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 (127). 18. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 25/B 39 40, A 32/B 47 8; cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 80 (117). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 89 (129); see also Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, 280. 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92, 76 (131, 110). 21. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 34/B 50 1. 22. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 100 (145).

Notes 185 23. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 102 (148 9); Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, 334 8. 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 104 (151); cf. also 183 (269). 25. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 67 8. 26. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 104 (152); see also Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, 338 9. 27. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 67 8. 28. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160. 29. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160 1. 30. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92 3 (133 4). 31. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (134). 32. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). By the time he came to write Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Heidegger had dropped his objection to the term synopsis, so that in this work it serves for what is called syndosis in the lectures. (Cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 100 (137).) Furthermore, it should be noted that although Heidegger does not repeat this discussion of syndosis in the note to 26 for Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, he clearly had not abandoned its application to this section. (Cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 102n (140 1n).) 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 94 5 (136 7). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92 (134). 38. Paul Natorp, Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften (Berlin and Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1910), 276; cf. reference in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 91 (132). 39. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 161. 40. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 161. 41. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 159. 42. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160. 43. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160. 44. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160 1. 45. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160. 46. This is not intended to deny that space and time as forms of intuition are unities in some sense before the understanding acts upon them. However, they are unities through being singular, not through being a combination. The consciousness of space and time as unified manifolds, that is, space and time as intuited, must always be according to the categories. 47. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160 1.

186 Notes 48. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 78 (113 14). 49. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 24/B 38 9 A 31/B 46. 50. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 25/B 39. 51. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 31 2/B 47. 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B 33. 53. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 161. 54. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 136. 55. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 320/B 376 7. 56. Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery According to which Any New Critique of Pure Reason Has Been Made Superfluous by an Earlier One. In The Kant- Eberhard Controversy, ed. and trans. Henry E. Allison (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973), 136; [Über eine Entdeckung, nach der alle neue Kritik der reinen Vernunft durch eine ältere entbehrlich gemacht werden soll, in Vol. 8 of Akademie-Ausgabe (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1923), 222]. 57. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 140/B 179. 58. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 131. 59. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 154. 60. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 219. 61. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 197/B 242 3. 62. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 137. 63. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, B 151 2. 64. Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery, 135 (221 2). 65. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 150 1. 66. Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery, 136 (222 3). 67. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 161. 68. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 154, B 158. 69. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 150. 70. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 142/B 181. 71. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 95 (138). 3. Transcendental Logic and the Problem of Judgement 1. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 (166). 2. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 169. 3. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 86/B 118 19. 4. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 (166). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 15 (167); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 48 (65). 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 115 (168). 7. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 126. 8. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 68/B 93; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 116 17 (170 1).

Notes 187 9. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B 102. 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 69/B 93 4; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 116 17 (170 1). 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 118 (172). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 118 (173). 13. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason. 119 20 (174 5); cf. also Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 55 6/B 79 80. 14. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 54 5/B 78 9. 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 122 (179). 16. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 123 (180 1). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 124 5 (182 4). 18. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 127 (186). 19. Cf. Chapter 1 of the present volume. 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 129 (189). 21. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 58/B 82. 22. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 129 30 (189 90). 23. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (21). 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (20). 25. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 14 (20). 26. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 147 8 (157 8). 27. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 148 (158 9). 28. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 149 (159). 29. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 206 (293 4). 30. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 206 7 (294). 31. See a parallel discussion in Being and Time, 206 7 (224 5). 32. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 201 (218 19). 33. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 207 8 (226). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 129 (189 90). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 131 (193). 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 138 (203). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 133 (195). 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 845 6/B 873 4.

188 Notes 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 136 (199 200). 40. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 140 (205). 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 140 1 (206). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 150 (220). 43. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 3), in Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe (Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, 1923), 92. 44. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 1), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 91. ( Verschiedenen here could mean many objects rather than many representations, but this does not make any significant change to the meaning of the passage.) 45. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 2), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 91. Heidegger discusses this in his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 153 4 (225 7). 46. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 93. 47. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 6), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 94. 48. Cf. Heidegger s discussion in his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 155 61 (228 36). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 153 (236); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 37 (49). 50. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 93. 51. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 94. 52. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 94. 53. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 3), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 92. 54. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 56/B 80, A 86 7/B 118 19. 55. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 164 (241). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 162 (238 9). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 162 3 (239). 58. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 142 3, 150 (209, 220). 59. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 163 (240); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 (51). 60. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 172 3. 61. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 168 (247). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 168 9 (248). 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (250); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 (51). 64. Immanuel Kant, Reflexionen Kants zur kritischen Philosophie, ed. Benno Erdmann (Leipzig: Fues s Verlag, 1882), Book 2, 172 3 (Reflection No. 544); cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (249) and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 9 (51 2).

Notes 189 65. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (249 50). 66. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 320/B 377. 67. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 4), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 93. 68. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 171 (251). 69. For the use of the term Metaphysical Deduction in reference to deducing the categories from the table of judgements, see Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 159. 70. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 128; cf. also A 111. 71. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 171 2 (252); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 46 (62). 72. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 172 (253). 73. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (312). 74. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 69/B 94. 75. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 178 (262). 76. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 178 (261 2). 77. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 176 7; cf. also B 143. 78. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 245; cf. also A 247/B 304. 79. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 254/B 309. 4. The Relation of the Categories to Ontological Synthesis 1. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 76 80/B 102 5. For the application of the phrase Metaphysical Deduction to this section, see B 159. 2. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 181 (265); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 3 (57). 3. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27). 4. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27). The quotation from Kant is from the Logik ( 17), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 101. 5. See the discussion of reflection in Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 36 7 (49); and Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 156 (229). 6. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (28). 7. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 28 9 (32 3). 8. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (28). 9. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 (57). 10. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 (57). 11. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 43 (57). 12. Heidegger does not indeed make it perfectly obvious that there is both an empirical and a pure veritative synthesis. This has led Henri Declève to claim mistakenly that veritative refers solely to the a priori synthesis (Heidegger et Kant, 122). However it is clear that Heidegger s earlier reference

190 Notes to veritative synthesis (Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27)) is to an empirical synthesis, for in this veritative synthesis a being is made manifest. 13. In his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (311), Heidegger also equates the pure predicative synthesis with the veritative synthesis. However, since these lectures contain no sure reference to the set of the veritative, apophantic and predicative syntheses, we can put this inconsistency down to Heidegger not having stabilized his terminology in this respect. 14. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B 102. 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 183 (269). 16. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 67 8. 17. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B 103. 18. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B 103. 19. Heidegger does leave open the possibility of this synthesis being a more broadly conceived kind of syndosis, but he discounts the possibility of this synthesis being mere syndosis as had been discussed in his treatment of the Transcendental Aesthetic. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 185, 187 8 (272, 276). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 185 (272 3); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 44 (59). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 187 (275); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 44 5 (60). 22. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 103. 23. By the time he came to revise the Critique of Pure Reason for its second edition, Kant had decided that the function of the mere understanding was also a synthesis, but a purely intellectual, non-imaginative synthesis. See Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 151. 24. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 94; cf. also A 115. 25. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 119; but see A 124. 26. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 97 8. 27. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B 29. 28. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 189 (278); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 96 (132). 29. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 147 (216); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 112 13 (155). 30. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 130, B 152. 31. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 103; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 191 (281). 32. Immanuel Kant, Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht ( 28), Vol. 7 of Akademie Ausgabe, 167. This definition is also given in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, at B 151. 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 189 (278); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 91 (123 4). 34. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 121. 35. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 140/B 179. 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 152. 37. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 104.

Notes 191 38. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (282 3). 39. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 104. 40. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (283). 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 193 (284). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (284). 43. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78 9/B 104. 44. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 194 (286). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 196 (288). 46. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 79/B 104 5. 47. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 196 (289). (The translation breaks the second sentence of the original German into two.) 48. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 196 7 (289). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 197 (289). There is an error in the translation here, which I have emended: Emad and Maly translate vermittelst as by no means. In their translation of the passage by Kant, they properly translate vermittelst as by means of, and this is the term that Heidegger is pointing out, rather than the ganz und gar nicht of his own text a few lines earlier, which they translate as by no means. 50. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 197 (290). 51. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (290). 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 104. 53. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 79/B 104. 54. See Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 116 19. 55. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 200 (290 3). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (291 2). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (291). 58. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 81/B 107. 59. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (295). 60. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (295 6). 61. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 2 (296). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 203 (299).

192 Notes 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 205 (301). 64. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 205 (302). 5. The Problem of the Transcendental Deduction 1. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 76 80/B 102 5. 2. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 85/B 117. 3. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 84 5/B 116 17. 4. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 209 (309). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 208 (307). 6. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A xii. 7. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 209 (307 8). 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (312 13). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (313). 10. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 206 (294). 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 213 (314). Emad and Maly use the hypenated ob-ject to stand for Objekt rather than Gegenstand. 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (313); cf. Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, 331 3. 13. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xvi, A 127 8. 14. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 210 (310); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 61 (83). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (311 12). 16. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 89/B 122. 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 224 (330); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 61 (83 4). 18. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 213 14 (315). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 224 (330). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 215 16 (318). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 216 (318). 22. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 92/B 124 5; (reading, with Erdmann, Vorstellungen for Vorstellung in the first sentence). 23. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 92/B 125; discussed in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 216 17 (319 20); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 50 1 (68).

Notes 193 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 217 18 (321); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 51 (69). 25. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 93/B 125 6; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (321). 26. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (321 2). 27. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 51 (69). Taft s term taking in stride translates hinnehmende, which I read as receptive. I have also added the missing t in nicht. 28. Charles Sherover has rightly noted that Heidegger emphasizes that the doctrine of the transcendental object is about the ontological structures that are involved in the appearing of an object as an object (Heidegger, Kant and Time, 91). 29. Mikel Dufrenne, La Notion d a priori (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959), 70. 30. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (322). 31. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 128; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (322 3). 32. This conception of a real definition differs from the real definition that Kant said was not possible for the categories. Real definition in this latter context is the definite relation of a concept to a specific object, such as the relation of the concept of a triangle to the presentation of that triangle in intuition (Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 241 2). 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 49 (66). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323). I have corrected the translation here: Emad and Maly s text reads sometimes only notions and something categories. 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 20 (324). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 220 (324); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 49 (66 7). 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 103. 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 227 (335). 40. This threefold synthesis as such is entirely lacking in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 230 (339). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 230 (339 40); see also Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 108 10. 43. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 227 8 (336).

194 Notes 44. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 228 (337). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338). 46. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 111. 47. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 120. 48. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 231 (340 1); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 124 5 (171 2). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 124 5 (173). 50. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 245, B 309. 51. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 98 9. 52. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 231 2 (341 2); citing Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 103. 53. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 232 (342 3). 54. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 232 (343). 55. For a discussion of Heidegger s attempted proof of syndosis with the context of the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, see Chapter 2 of the present work. 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 231 (341). 57. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 99. 58. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 99; discussed in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 233 4 (343 5) and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 125 6 (173 4). 59. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 234 (346). 60. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 99 100; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 235 (347). 61. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 235 (347). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 235 6 (347 8); cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 126 (174). 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 236 (348). 64. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338). 65. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 97. 66. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 58 (84). 67. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160n. 68. It seems silly to say that space and time cannot be understood without being understood, but this is an exact statement of the problem. The radical incomprehensibility of time and space in themselves would seem to be the reason why in the second edition Kant emphasized (especially in

Notes 195 the section headings) that he was dealing with the concepts of space and time (note the changes at Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 20, B 34). 69. This concerns the actual consistency of images, not the consciousness of their sameness, which belongs to the synthesis of recognition. 70. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 102. 71. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 102. 72. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (352); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 127 (176). 73. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353). 74. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353). 75. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 128 (177). 76. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 102; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 354. 77. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 40 (354). 78. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 128 (177). 79. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354). 80. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354). 81. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 103. 82. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 103. 83. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 104 5. 84. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 106. 85. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 107. 86. This assertion that apperception is the basis of the purest objective unity might be taken as an argument against Heidegger s claim that time has its own unity that is not dependent upon understanding. However, Heidegger could argue that it is only the concepts of space and time that are at issue here, not their unities as intuitions. 87. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 109. 88. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 111; (reading, with Erdmann, oben for the first eben in the second sentence). 89. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 111 12. 90. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (355). 91. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 258 (381). 92. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 1 (355). 93. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 241 (355). 94. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 241 (356 7).