Proving the Existence of God

Similar documents

Important dates. PSY 3360 / CGS 3325 Historical Perspectives on Psychology Minds and Machines since David Hume ( )

First Truths. G. W. Leibniz

The Creation of the World in Time According to Fakhr al-razi

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

CONCEPT OF GOD, HIS ONENESSAND HIS DIVINE ATTRIBUTES

Class 11 - February 23 Leibniz, Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics

Mind and Body. Is mental really material?"

The Divine Nature. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J.

out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives an argument specifically

SCHOOL ^\t. MENTAL CURE. Metaphysical Science, ;aphysical Text Book 749 TREMONT STREET, FOR STUDENT'S I.C6 BOSTON, MASS. Copy 1 BF 1272 BOSTON: AND

The question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now

The Definition of God

Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII

The Thirteen Attributes of Allah Every Accountable Person Must Know

1/9. Leibniz on Descartes Principles

The cosmological argument (continued)

7. Time Is Not Real. JOHN M. E. McTAGGART

Aristotle on the Principle of Contradiction :

Fundamental Beliefs in the Divine (AQD107 Islamic Belief I) Week Two Handout CONTENTS

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2013 (Daniel)

Aristotle and the Definition of Man

PART ONE. Preparing For Battle

The Cosmological Argument: A Defense

THE PROBLEM OF PERSONAL IDENTITY

Aristotle and Aquinas

Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion

The Definition of God

PHYSICS by Aristotle

The Analysis of the Substantive Motion Arguments of Mulla Sadra Sedighe Abtahi PhD student at the Institute of Islamic Sciences and Cultural Studies

C O N T E N T S. Foreword... 7 Pronunciation Key Biographical Introduction Introduction... 19

In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central

QUESTION 58. The Mode of an Angel s Cognition

The Solution to Skepticism by René Descartes (1641) from Meditations translated by John Cottingham (1984)

Spinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS. by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M.

One of the many common questions that are asked is If God does exist what reasons

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

QUESTION 42. The Equality and Likeness of the Divine Persons in Comparison to One Another

Knowledge of the Holy

By J. Alexander Rutherford. Part one sets the roles, relationships, and begins the discussion with a consideration

The Trinity, The Dogma, The Contradictions Part 2

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature ( ), Book I, Part III.

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

WRITTEN BY: DR. NAJI IBRAHIM EDITED BY: ANN RONAYNE DESIGNED BY:DR. WASEEMRIAZ

The Liberty Corner Presbyterian Church

Of Cause and Effect David Hume

The Five Ways of St. Thomas in proving the existence of

1/10. Descartes and Spinoza on the Laws of Nature

ACU Short Course God

3 The Problem of Absolute Reality

The Attributes of God The Incomprehensible God

Aquinas, The Divine Nature

THE LEIBNIZ CLARKE DEBATES

Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things

Ethics Demonstrated in Geometrical Order

Fourth Meditation: Truth and falsity

DISCUSSIONS WITH K. V. LAURIKAINEN (KVL)

QUESTION 45. The Mode of the Emanation of Things from the First Principle

Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza: Concept of Substance Chapter 3 Spinoza and Substance. (Woolhouse)

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature

BELIEF IN ANGELS CHAPTER. Lesson 1 Understanding God s Existence. Lesson 2 Six Articles of Faith Lesson 3 The Essence and Attributes of God

Critique of Cosmological Argument

An Analysis of the Proofs for the Principality of the Creation of Existence in the Transcendent Philosophy of Mulla Sadra

Chapters on the Trinity and the Union

First Treatise <Chapter 1. On the Eternity of Things>

1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies

This issue is clearly stated in a number of passages of scripture. Before considering John 1:1-3, 14, let us cite from other scriptures as follows:

From the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010

Moral Obligation. by Charles G. Finney

Ethics Demonstrated in Geometrical Order

St. Thomas Aquinas Excerpt from Summa Theologica

God the Father. In the. (Genesis 1:1, niv).

The Knowledge of the Holy, A.W.Tozer

Outcomes of the Spiritual Journey

Previous Final Examinations Philosophy 1

Thought is Being or Thought and Being? Feuerbach and his Criticism of Hegel's Absolute Idealism by Martin Jenkins

Novena in Honor of the Immaculate Conception with St. Maximilian Kolbe

Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination

On The Existence of God

by Br. Dunstan Robidoux OSB

1/8. Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God

Teleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?

Do you have a self? Who (what) are you? PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2014

QUESTION 47. The Diversity among Things in General

Ethics Demonstrated in Geometrical Order

On the Notions of Essence, Hypostasis, Person, and Energy in Orthodox Thought

Personality and Soul: A Theory of Selfhood

Lesson 4. Systematic Theology Pastor Tim Goad

SPINOZA S VERSION OF THE PSR: A Critique of Michael Della Rocca s Interpretation of Spinoza

1. LEADER PREPARATION

Spinoza on God, Affects, and the Nature of Sorrow

AVICENNA S METAPHYSICS AS THE ACT OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN GOD AND HUMAN BEINGS

Concerning God Baruch Spinoza

Time by J. M. E. McTaggart. Chapter 33 of The Nature of Existence

PART THREE: The Field of the Collective Unconscious and Its inner Dynamism

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.

A. Aristotle D. Descartes B. Plato E. Hume

Transcription:

1 S H E I K H J A F F E R H J A F F E R A L I 4 7 4 - T H E O L O G Y

Why do we need to prove the existence of God? One: It is part of our Fitrah (Innate Nature) to be curious 2 This is an important step in the maturity of faith - where we ask ourselves why we do what we do and why we believe what we believe شكر المنعم Two: To thank the provider Three: To defend your beliefs/debate with others

What are the benefits of knowing God and having faith in Him? One: It brings about a sense of peace and hope 3 Two: It creates within human beings a sense of responsibility Three: According to A. Nasir Makarim Shirazi in Fifty Lessons on Principles of Belief for Youth knowing God helps with the progress of Science: He states: The world of creation is like a great book in which every creature forms a word or sentence in that. From the point of view of a person who worships God, every atom of this universe is worthy of study

4 How can we prove the existence of God? First: An inward way (the closest way) - The knowledge by فطري presence A. N M Shirazi states: Scholars say that every human being who thinks, from whatever class or race one be, if left alone, receives no special training, not even hears the words of people who worship God nor the words of materialists, that person will naturally become aware of a force or power which is above nature and which rules all of the world. Even if one is occupied and run over with material pleasures when difficulties or disaster strikes their life this inner sound gains strength When they board the ship, they invoke Allah putting exclusive faith in Him, but when He delivers them to land, behold, they ascribe partners[ to Him ] (29:65)

How can we prove the existence of God (cont)? Second: The Outward Way (The clearest way) - النظم برهان Proof based on organization/ system A. N M Shirazi states: With a quick glance at the world that we live in, we realize that the world is not in chaos and disorder. Rather, all phenomena are in motion moving towards a clear and determined direction. The facilities of the world are like a great army which has been divided into well-organized units which move in a determined direction. He describes that when a human being pays attention to the world around them, they will see Order and Intellect in everything: One: Every creature, in order to remain and survive, must be part of a series of laws and special conditions Two: Every creature has a special effect that is particular to it which they constantly follow All of the members (organs) of living creatures work and are coordinated with each other 5

Second Way: The Outward Way (Cont) He states: This truth is clear for everyone s conscience that whenever order exists in a facility, this shows intellect, thought, a plan and a goal. 6 Thus, wherever there is a sense of order, beside that, there has been an intellect and however much larger that system be, it is more accurate and more interesting, the knowledge which brings that into being in the same proportion is greater. Soon We shall show them Our signs in the horizons and in their own souls until it becomes clear to them that He is the Real. Is it not sufficient that your Lord is witness to all things? (41:53)

How can we prove the existence of God (cont)? Third: A Philosophical/Intellectual Poof - Proof of a Necessary واجب الوجود Existent Necessary existent الوجود),(واجب i.e. an existent which does not need, require or depend upon any other existent for coming into being 7 Why is it necessary for there to be an existent which does not require or depend upon any other existent for coming into being? Because if every existent required another existent for it to come into being; each one of them in turn requiring a cause, no existent would ever come into being, because an infinite series (tasalsul) of causes is impossible Therefore an infinite series of causes is compelled to terminate in an existent (mawjūd), which is not a caused thing (ma lūl) of any other existent, i.e. the necessary existent.

Third proof (in more detail): In English Grammar, a sentence has two fundamental parts -subject and predicate The establishment of a predicate for the subject can only have three states: It is either impossible (ممتنع) ex: the number 3 is greater than the number 4 It is necessary (واجب) ex: the number 2 is half of 4 It is neither impossible nor necessary (ممكن) ex: the sun is above our head In philosophy only existence is discussed; Therefore those things which are impossible for being in existence are ignored and not discussed (ممتنع) 8

Third proof (in more detail): Necessary existence (واجب) is known as an existent, which exists in-itself and does not depend upon another existent. Possible existence (ممكن) is known as an existent, which does not exist in-itself and depends on another existent in order for it to be realized. Therefore, existence through intellectual perception can be conceptualized in three essential possibilities: 1) Every existent is a necessary existent. 2) Every existent is a possible existent. 3) Some existents are necessary existents and some are possible existents. 9

Third proof (in more detail): #1 is impossible For this statement to be true this would mean that all things in existence are independent and do not depend on anything else #2 is impossible 10 Because possible existences are those which do not exist in-itself and depends on another existent in order for it to be realized - In other words, they requires a cause (عل ة) for their existence. The impossibility of #2 (Every existent is a possible existent) can be proved through 2 means: First: If all existents were possible existents, this would mean each one of them requires a cause of its existence This would lead to an infinite regression of causes (التسلسل) which is impossible! Second: What if we said, A caused B and B caused C and C caused A This is known as a Vicious Circle (الدور) which is also impossible By disproving #1 and #2 we are left with only #3 - Some existents are necessary existents and some are possible existents

How to prove the Oneness of the Necessary Existent? (Let us suppose there are 2 Necessary Existents) If there were 2 NE; we can only have a few possibilities of their Causal Prowess First: Each existent is created by both the NE s together. 11 Second: Some existents are created by one NE while others are created by the other NE Third: One NE runs the show while the second NE agrees with everything

First: Each existent is created by both the NE s together. When each NE would give existence to the same existent; it would mean that each NE would provide an independent existence for that one existent i.e. they would have 2 existences However since each existent only has one existence, this would negate the possibility of its existence coming from more than one necessary existent Second: Some existents are created by one NE while others are created by the other NE This means that each existent is in existence because of its particular NE, consequently it is fully dependent on their specific NE Therefore, they are governed and ruled by their NE s specific system and order. Which would mean that there are two different systems and orders in this world However the clear harmony and organization in our world is running in one harmonious and organized order Third: One NE runs the show while the second NE agrees with everything This defeats the purpose of the second NE THEREFORE: We are left with it that there can truly just be one NE!! 12

After proving the Oneness of the Necessary Existent; the task is now to prove the qualities and attributes of this existent Why is this important? So we can recognize the Creator distinctly from His Creation Because it is not sufficient to merely know Him as the necessary existent, because some may conceive of energy or matter (like the big bang) as being the example for this necessary existent By defining the NE الوجود) (واجب as an existent that does not require any cause for its existence and it is the primary cause for all PE; we have proved 2 of its attributes Independent not dependent on any other existent First Cause of all possible existences 13

Because the NE is Independent and not needy of any other existence NOR does it require a cause to continue its existence, we can confidently say it has always existed and will always exist Therefore: NE is without beginning, meaning that He never was preceded by nonexistence. NE is without end, meaning that He will never be nonexistent 14 These two attributes are called in Arabic سرمدي everlasting or eternal

Another essential part of the NE is that must be simple غير مركب and non-compound بسيط i.e. not made up of physical parts or intellectual parts Question: Why can t the NE be made up of Physical Parts? Answer: Anything made up of physical parts is compound and is dependent upon those parts NE is independent of everything; therefore we can positively conclude then that NE cannot be a physical organism. 15 By nullifying any Physical or Tangible existence for the NE we can then prove further qualities of the NE NE cannot be limited to or subjected to time and space because time and space can be divided and anything which can be divided has a beginning or an end Therefore; what we have done so far is prove certain NEGATIVE QUALITIES الصفات السلبية which do not exist in the NE: زمان Time ;مكان Space ; - جسم Body

Question: Why can t the NE be made up of Intellectual Parts? Answer: When we describe or define a physical existent; we can give an intellectual definition to it Ex: Human beings = Talking Animal Ex: Lion = Roaring Animal Anything which can be given an intellectual definition, can thus be intellectually annihilated. HOW? By splitting up the definition However since the NE is not made up of any physical parts does not have a ما هية (as we have described), we cannot intellectually give it a definition, therefore, it is impossible for it to be annihilated. Which is why we said earlier that the NE must be simple andبسيط not compound 16

So far we have proven the following Characteristics/ Attributes for the NE NE must be Independent i.e. not dependent on any other existent NE is the First Cause of all possible existences NE is without beginning, meaning that He never was preceded by nonexistence. NE is without end, meaning that He will never be non-existent. NE cannot be made up of any Physical or Intellectual parts - جسم NE does not have Body 17 زمان Time ;مكان Space ; Looking at the above the above Characteristics from a Divine (Religious) Worldview as opposed to a Material Worldview we would (based on the distinguishing/unique attributes) call the NE God

18 One of the points to realize when we discuss the attributes of Allah SWT no matter how we describe Him these descriptions are limited due to the limitations that exist within ourselves Sayyid Mujtaba Lari and God and His Attributes says: In our efforts to describe the Creator and gain knowledge of His attributes, we ideally need concepts and expressions that are beyond our reach. Those terms we do employ are unable to help us in reaching our goal, a true description of God, for our limited understandings cannot accommodate a perception of the nature of God's infinite attributes. He is exalted above all concepts coined and fashioned by the human mind. Man, who is created and limited in every respect, should not expect to be able to assess and describe a non-material being by means of material attributes and characteristics. Allah SWT says: Nothing is like Him, and He is the All-hearing, the All-seeing (42:11)

S. Lari says: The fact that God's attributes are utterly separate from ours and cannot be examined through a comparison with our attributes is because the attributes of that fountainhead of being are different from the attributes of all other beings. 19 For example, we have the ability to perform certain tasks, but this is not the same as the power of God; in our case, the attribute is one thing and the entity it describes is another. When we boast of our knowledge, we are not one and identical with our knowledge. The attributes are accidents and our essence is a substance; each is independent of the other But the case of the divine attributes is fundamentally different. When we say that God is all-knowing and all-powerful, what we mean is that He is the source of knowledge and power: the attribute is not something other than the entity it describes although it is conceptually distinct. And this is what is known as Tawheed Fi Dhaat Oneness (Unity) of Essence

20 Then S. Lari continues: When the question of divine unity is raised in religious discourse, it is taken to include many topics including belief in the oneness of the essence, so, too, the compounding of the attributes and the distinction between essence and attributes is totally excluded with respect to unity of the attributes. Distinctness and differentiation derive from limitation. the different attributes which appear to resemble the properties of our limited beings, we attempt to separate them from His infinite essence. Objectively, however, all the concepts conveyed by the different attributes have a single existence and convey a single reality, a reality that is free of all defect and deficiency, that possesses all perfection's such as power, mercy, knowledge, blessedness, wisdom and splendour. *Look at NB Sermon 1 So each attribute is infinite and coextensive with the infinitude of the essence. God is free of and exempt from finite attributes that might be distinct from each other and separate from the essence.

Having understood the above (that the attributes and essence are one and infinite), then it becomes impossible to to accept any contingent phenomenon or created thing in His place, and to imagine that any other being might be His partner or equal in commanding and controlling the destinies of the world, or even have some share in administering the order of the universe. If numerous gods ruled over the world and each of these gods acted and gave commands in accordance with his own will, the order of the universe would dissolve into anarchy. "If there were numerous gods other than the one true God, the order of the heavens and the earth would collapse. So exalted be the Lord of the Throne above what they say concerning Him." (21:22) Why? He says: It is (only) feasible to conceive of plurality within a given category once we speak of limitations such as quantity, quality, and time. God, however, is not limited by any of these, and it is, therefore, impossible to conceive of Him having any like or congener. 21