Inductive Reasoning. Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples.

Similar documents
Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

Recall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

Instructor s Manual 1

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic By R.A. Neidorf READ ONLINE

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

A Discussion Among Friends

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Answers to Practice Problems 7.3

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

APLC/Spring 2015/Syllogism and Enthymeme Practice 2. Hi guys! Sorry to be absent today. I will be back tomorrow.

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Al-Qaeda warns of more attacks

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Department of Philosophy

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

How can you combat your mental set? With lateral thinking.

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

March 09, Logic 2.notebook 25) D 26) D 27) C

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Test Item File. Full file at

Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE

Illustrating Deduction. A Didactic Sequence for Secondary School

The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic

Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015

Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs

Introduction to Logic

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Introduction to Logic

Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Assessing Confidence in an Assurance Case

Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text.

Proofs of Non-existence

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Lecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

Formal Reasoning 2-Logic

MATH1061/MATH7861 Discrete Mathematics Semester 2, Lecture 5 Valid and Invalid Arguments. Learning Goals

THERE IS AN HISTORICAL DEBATE in philosophy that begins with Plato s

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Wednesday, April 20, 16. Introduction to Philosophy

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Chapter 2: Two Types of Reasoning

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

1.6 Validity and Truth

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

David E. Alexander and Daniel Johnson, eds. Calvinism and the Problem of Evil.

Introducing Our New Faculty

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Al-Qaeda warns of more attacks

Transcription:

Inductive Reasoning Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples. Examples: All crows are black. The sun will rise tomorrow. All Islamic people are terrorists. Gravity: Things fall down. Scientific Method is based on induction. If you perform an experiment over and over with the same results each time, you begin to formulate general laws to explain your observations. Medical Experiments. All even numbers > 2 are composite: Look at 4, 6, 8, 10 All odd numbers > 1 are prime: Look at 3, 5, 7 x 2 > x: Look at 1, 2, 3, 4, Deductive Reasoning We consider four types of rules. Rule 1. Direct Reasoning p is true therefore, q is true 1

2 Examples: If Kerry Wood and Mark Prior stay with the Cubs, then the Cubs will win the World Series next year. Kerry Wood and Mark Prior sign contracts to stay in Chicago next year. Therefore, the Cubs will win the World Series next year. If a number is prime, then it is odd. 11 is prime. Therefore, 11 is odd. If a number is prime, then it is odd. 2 is prime. Therefore, 2 is odd. Rule 2. Indirect Reasoning q is false therefore, p is false Observe that indirect reasoning is really direct reasoning using the contrapositive of p implies q. Examples: If the Afghan leaders hand over bin Laden, then the U. S. will not attack their country. The U. Sȧttacked Afghanistan. Therefore, the Afghan leaders did not surrender bin Laden. The murderer was left handed. I am not left handed. Therefore, I am not the murderer.

3 If a number > 2 is prime, then it is odd. 12 is not odd. Therefore, 12 is not prime. If a person gets older, then they get wiser. I am not getting any wiser. Therefore, I am getting younger. Rule 3. Transitivity if q then r if p then r Classic Example: For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost. For the want of a shoe, the horse was lost. For the want of a horse, the rider was lost. For the want of a rider, the battle was lost. (All because of a single nail.) If Mark Prior pitches well in Game 7, then the Cubs will win the game. If the Cubs wins game 7, then they will win the World Series. Therefore, if Mark Prior pitches well in Game 7, then the Cubs will win the World Series. If you are anorexic, then you won t eat. If you don t eat, then you will die. Therefore, if you are anorexic, then you will die.

4 Rule 4. The or rule Example: p or q q is false p must be true Either the man is stupid or he is lying. He is not stupid. Therefore, he is lying. Find positive solutions to x 2 2x 3 < 0.

5 Rule 1. Direct Reasoning Summary p is true therefore, q is true Rule 2. Indirect Reasoning q is false therefore, p is false Rule 3. Transitivity Rule 4. The or rule if q then r if p then r p or q q is false p must be true

6 What is the best conclusion you can reach from the following premises? Either relief supplies are sent by U. S. or seven million Ethiopians starve. If the U. Sṡends relief supplies, goverment controlled areas can be reached. If government controlled areas can be reached, the fighting has declined. The fighting has escalated. Timber thieves seek personal gain over public good. People who steal artifacts from Indian sites do not appreciate history. You are educated. Those who don t steal artifacts from Indian sites do not seek personal gain over public good. People who do not appreciate history are not educated.

7 Formal Fallacies An invalid argument is one in which the conclusion does not follow logically from the premises. Determine whether the following arguments are valid or invalid. All mothers are women. Hillary Clinton is a mother. Hillary Clinton is a woman. All mothers are women. Janet Reno is a woman. Janet Reno is a mother. Some jugglers are women. Janet Reno is a woman. Janet Reno is a juggler. Some jugglers are women. Cindy is a juggler. Cindy is a woman. Some men are tumblers. Some jugglers are women. No women are tumblers. Some men are jugglers.

8 Some men are tumblers. Some jugglers are women. No women are tumblers. Some people are both tumblers and jugglers. Some men are jugglers. If bleebs are quills then blarbs are snarfs. If blarbs are snarfs then blairs are mares. Blairs are not mares. Bleebs are not quills. If Harry lands the Johnson account, then he will get a raise. Harry got a raise. Harry landed the Johnson account. If I hit my thumb with a hammer, then my thumb will hurt. My thumb hurts. I hit my thumb with a hammer. Must a logically minded person accept the conclusion of a valid argument? Only if you accept all the premises. If a person gets older, then they get wiser. I am not getting any wiser. Therefore, I am getting younger.

9 All innocent human beings have a right to live. A human fetus is a human being. Abortion is wrong. Must a person accept the conclusion of a valid argument, if they accept as true all the premises? Only if you choose to act logically.