What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

Similar documents
Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Perry High School. Geometry: Week 5

correlated to the Massachussetts Learning Standards for Geometry C14

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

G.CO.C.9: Inverse, Converse, Contrapositive and Conditional Statements 1b

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

Assignment Assignment for Lesson 3.1

Exercise 2-1 Instructions: Identify the premises and conclusions in the following arguments.

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

INSTRUCTION: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS or COMPLETE THE STATEMENTS BY CHOOSING THE BEST

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

INDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

FE Review (G7_Geometry) #3

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Basic Concepts and Skills!

It Ain t What You Prove, It s the Way That You Prove It. a play by Chris Binge

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

REASONING SYLLOGISM. Subject Predicate Distributed Not Distributed Distributed Distributed

L4: Reasoning. Dani Navarro

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I

Time, Self and Mind (ATS1835) Introduc;on to Philosophy B Semester 2, Dr Ron Gallagher Week 5: Can Machines Think?

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

Phil-004 (Galindo): Spring 14 - Quiz #4

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

On Priest on nonmonotonic and inductive logic

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Thinking and Reasoning

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Recall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true

Geometry Standard Lesson Plan Overview

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic Test 1: The Structure of Arguments

Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.

Reasoning CK-12. Say Thanks to the Authors Click (No sign in required)

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

7) UVW IWK 9) BCD TSD 11) NML NJI LNM?

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

Answers to Practice Problems 6.5

ENGLISH VERB TENSES FORMS, USES, AND EXAMPLES

Introduction to Philosophy

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Unit 2. Spelling Most Common Words Root Words. Student Page. Most Common Words

Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Table of Contents. What This Book Teaches... iii Four Myths About Critical Thinking... iv Pretest...v

Inglês CHAPTERS 13 to 14

Moon s Day, March 23: Elementary Reasoning

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

A romp through the foothills of logic Session 3

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Modal verbs of obligation. LEVEL NUMBER LANGUAGE Beginner A2_1057G_EN English

1. The logic problem about the dragon went smoothly. The participants not only gave the right answers, but also explained (proved!) them.

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning Example #1

MODAL VERBS EXERCISES

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

1)Asher: create a handout for the week summing up LOGIC

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Logic Practice Test 1

PHLA10F 2. PHLA10F What is Philosophy?

THE USELESSNESS OF VENN DIAGRAMS*

Syllogism. Exam Importance Exam Importance. CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important. XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important

Module 3 : English Grammar. Index

Test Item File. Full file at

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH WITH BACKSHIFT OF TENSES

Transcription:

2 4 Deductive Reasoning Learning Targets: I understand deductive reasoning I can use the Law of Detachment I can use a Venn diagram to draw conclusions I can use the Law of Syllogism What other evidence might a detective collect? Why is eliminating suspects useful for detectives? What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM Deductive Reasoning: reasoning using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions from given statements. 1. In Miguel's town, the month of April has had the most rain for the past 5 years. He thinks that April will have the most rain this year. 2. Sandra learned that if it is cloudy at night it will not be as cold in the morning as it would be if there are no clouds at night. Sandra knows it will be cloudy tonight, so she believes it will not be cold tomorrow morning. 3. All of the signature items on the restaurant's menu shown are noted with a special symbol. Kevin orders a menu item that has this symbol next to it, so he concludes that the menu item that he has ordered is a signature item. 4. None of the students who ride Raul's bus own a car. Ebony rides a bus to school, so Raul concludes that Ebony does not own a car. Jul 29 6:35 PM 1

While one counterexample is enough to disprove a conjecture reached using inductive reasoning, it is not a logically correct (or valid) way of proving a conjecture. To prove a conjecture requires deductive reasoning. Law of Detachment is one form of deductive reasoning Jul 29 6:54 PM Jul 29 7:27 PM 2

Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning. 5. Given: If a figure is a square, then it is a parallelogram. The figure is a parallelogram. Conclusion: The figure is a square. 6. Given: If three points are noncollinear, they determine a plane. Points A, B, and C lie in place G. Conclusion: Points A, B, and C are noncollinear. 7. Given: If a student turns in a permission slip, then the student can go on the field trip. Felipe turned in his permission slip. Conclusion: Felipe can go on the field trip. Jul 29 7:31 PM Jul 29 7:42 PM 3

Determine whether the conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning using a Venn diagram. 8. Given: If a triangle is equilateral, then it is an acute triangle. The triangle is equilateral. Conclusion: The triangle is acute. 9. Given: If a figure is a square, then it is a polygon. Figure A is a square. Conclusion: Figure A is a polygon. Jul 29 7:55 PM Law of Syllogism: another valid for of deductive reasoning. This law allows you to draw conclusions from two true conditional statements when the conclusion of one statement is the hypothesis of the other. REMEMBER: if the conclusion of the first statement is not the hypothesis of the second statement, no valid conclusion can be drawn. Jul 29 8:06 PM 4

Jul 29 6:59 PM Determine which statement follows logically from the given statements. 10. (1) If Jamal finishes his homework, he will go out with his friends. (2) If Jamal goes out with his friends, he will go to the movies. A. If Jamal goes out with his friends, then he finishes his homework. B. If Jamal finishes his homework, he will go to the movies. C. If Jamal does not go to the movies, he does not go out with his friends. D. There is no valid conclusion. 11. (1) If you do not get enough sleep, then you will be tired. (2) If you are tired, then you will not do well on the test. F. If you are tired, then you will not get enough sleep. G. If you do not get enough sleep, then you will not do well on the test. H. If you do not do well on the test, then you did not get enough sleep. J. There is no valid conclusion. Jul 29 8:13 PM 5

Example 5: Draw a valid conclusion from the given statements, if possible. Then state whether your conclusion was drawn using the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If no valid conclusion can be drawn, write no conclusion and explain your reasoning. 12. Given: If it snows more than 5 inches, school will be closed. It snows 7 inches. 13. Given: The midpoint divides a segment into two congruent segments. If two segments are congruent, then their measures are equal. M is the midpoint of AB. Jul 29 8:18 PM 6