Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Similar documents
A. The Three Main Branches of the Philosophical Study of Ethics. 2. Normative Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Virtue Ethics without Character Traits

James Rachels. Ethical Egoism

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

In Defense of The Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle. Simon Rippon

Philosophy 3100: Ethical Theory

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.

Challenges to Traditional Morality

Mackie s Error Theory of Moral Judgments

Let us begin by first locating our fields in relation to other fields that study ethics. Consider the following taxonomy: Kinds of ethical inquiries

Judith Jarvis Thomson s Normativity

Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism

The Rightness Error: An Evaluation of Normative Ethics in the Absence of Moral Realism

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

The way we convince people is generally to refer to sufficiently many things that they already know are correct.

How to Write a Philosophy Paper

STILL NO REDUNDANT PROPERTIES: REPLY TO WIELENBERG

The Foundations of Christian Morality

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Situational Ethics Actions often cannot be evaluated in a vacuum. Suppose someone moves their hand rapidly forward, is that action right or wrong? The

Wolterstorff on Divine Commands (part 1)

PLEASESURE, DESIRE AND OPPOSITENESS

On Dogramaci. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2015 Vol. 4, No. 4,

Foundations of Bioethics

Psychological and Ethical Egoism

Lecture Notes Rosalind Hursthouse, Normative Virtue Ethics (1996, 2013) Keith Burgess-Jackson 4 May 2016

Kantian Deontology - Part Two

Are Humans Always Selfish? OR Is Altruism Possible?

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good)

Paul Ramsey, James Gustafson, and Stanley Hauerwas

Psychological Egoism. A Popular Mistake

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

Hume s Law Violated? Rik Peels. The Journal of Value Inquiry ISSN J Value Inquiry DOI /s

PHIL Philosophy of Religion

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Philosophy. Aim of the subject

Ethics is subjective.

A Refutation of Hedonism. And whatever is bad in itself for a person is bad in virtue of its painfulness.

What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me?

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?

SEMINAR IN ETHICS: ETHICS AND EVOLUTION PHIL 848J

Truth and Molinism * Trenton Merricks. Molinism: The Contemporary Debate edited by Ken Perszyk. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Is Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal? Joseph Barnes

Does God exist? The argument from evil

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

Henrik Ahlenius Department of Philosophy ETHICS & RESEARCH

Lecture 2: What Ethics is Not. Jim Pryor Guidelines on Reading Philosophy Peter Singer What Ethics is Not

Welcome to Philosophy!

Defining Relativism Ethical Relativism is the view that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends partially upon the beliefs and culture of the

The view that all of our actions are done in self-interest is called psychological egoism.

Virtue Ethics. Chapter 7 ETCI Barbara MacKinnon Ethics and Contemporary Issues Professor Douglas Olena

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

Chapter 2--How Should One Live?

A solution to the problem of hijacked experience

Well, how are we supposed to know that Jesus performed miracles on earth? Pretty clearly, the answer is: on the basis of testimony.

Plato s Protagoras Virtue & Expertise. Plato s Protagoras The Unity of the Virtues

Pojman: What is Moral Philosophy?

The Problem of Normativity

Criticizing Arguments

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

Exhibit C. Sample Pediatric Forensic Informed Consent Form (Longer Version) {Insert Letterhead} INFORMED CONSENT FOR NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethical Relativism: subjective objective ethical nihilism Ice cream is good subjective

Cultural Relativism 1

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

Constructing the World

McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism

What is a counterexample?

Part I: The Structure of Philosophy

Socratic and Platonic Ethics

Hi and welcome back if you have viewed any of the previous videos. My name is Tim

Hence, you and your choices are a product of God's creation Psychological State. Stephen E. Schmid

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur

Ethical Egoism. Ethical Egoism Things You Should Know. Quiz: one sentence each beginning with The claim that

Moral Psychology

Introducing truth tables. Hello, I m Marianne Talbot and this is the first video in the series supplementing the Formal Logic podcasts.

New Chapter: Ethics and Morality

Aboutness and Justification

Attraction, Description, and the Desire-Satisfaction Theory of Welfare

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

the Elect and the Reprobates, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and perseverance of the elect.

Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals

MORAL CHOICES: Considering the Alternatives

course PHIL 80: Introduction to Philosophical Problems, Fall 2018

POPULATION ETHICS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE July , University of Bayreuth. Overview

A dialogical, multi-agent account of the normativity of logic. Catarin Dutilh Novaes Faculty of Philosophy University of Groningen

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 4 points).

Professional Ethics. Today s Topic Ethical Egoism PHIL Picture: Ursa Major. Illustration: Cover art from Ayn Rand s The Fountainhead

Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

Reasons With Rationalism After All MICHAEL SMITH

DANCY ON ACTING FOR THE RIGHT REASON

Virtue Ethics. I.Virtue Ethics was first developed by Aristotle in his work Nichomachean Ethics

Transcription:

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 2 - Introduction to the Normative Ethics of Behavior: 1. What is Normative Ethics? 2. The Normative Ethics of Behavior 3. Moral Principles 4. Fully General Moral Principles / Moral Theories 5. Refuting Moral Theories

recall this earlier slide What is Ethics? The Three Main Areas of Ethics: Metaethics - the attempt to discover (i) the meaning of moral claims, (ii) the nature of moral facts (if there are any), and (iii) how we can know moral facts. Normative Ethics - the attempt to discover the correct moral principles Practical Ethics - the attempt to discover the answers to certain specific moral questions

recall this earlier slide (ii) the nature of moral facts (if there are any), and (iii) how we can know moral facts. What is Normative Ethics - the attempt to discover the correct moral principles Practical Ethics - the attempt to discover the answers to certain specific

What is Normative Ethics? the parts of our class that are on normative ethics are on this one The Three Main Areas of Normative Ethics: The Normative Ethics of Behavior - the attempt to discover what makes actions right or wrong Axiology - the attempt to discover what makes states of affairs (e.g., people s lives, certain situations) good or bad Virtue-Vice Theory - the attempt to discover what makes a person a good person or a bad person

The Normative Ethics of Behavior The Case of Baby Theresa Many kinds of question about this case: scientific legal religious psychological moral Would it be right for the parents to remove Baby Theresa s organs, thereby causing her immediate death, to help the other children? (Rachels, p. 2)

clicker question What s your opinion? Would it be right for the parents to remove Baby Theresa s organs, thereby causing her immediate death, in order to help the other children? A. Yes, it would be right for the parents to do this. B. No, it would be wrong for the parents to do this. C. Morality is a bourgeois myth. Set yourself free!

Moral Principles To answer the moral question about Baby Theresa, we use a moral principle. A moral principle is a statement saying that some kind of action is always morally right (or morally wrong, or morally obligatory). We explain the rightness or wrongness of some particular action (such as the removing of Baby Theresa organs) by appealing to a moral principle.

Moral Principles Some possible principles for the case of Baby Theresa... KSP: It is wrong to kill one person to save another. PGP: It is wrong to play God. BP: If we can benefit someone without harming anyone else, we ought to do so.

Moral Principles For a moral principle to yield a verdict about a particular case, we also need to appeal to some fact about the case. Baby Theresa Argument P1. It is wrong to kill one person to save another. C. Therefore, it s wrong to remove Baby s Theresa s organs in order to save another child. VALID or INVALID?

Moral Principles moral principle fact about the case moral conclusion or verdict about the case Baby Theresa Argument (improved) P1. It is wrong to kill one person to save another. P2. To remove Baby s Theresa s organs in order to save another child is to kill one person to save another. C. Therefore, it s wrong to remove Baby s Theresa s organs in order to save another child. VALID or INVALID?

Moral Principles It s not always obvious whether some alleged fact about the case really is a fact about the case. Playing God Argument Is this true? P1. It s wrong to play God. P2. To remove Baby s Theresa s organs in order to save another child is to play God. C. Therefore, it s wrong to remove Baby s Theresa s organs in order to save another child. It depends what play God means.

Fully General Moral Principles None of the three principles we have mentioned so far... KSP: It is wrong to kill one person to save another. PGP: It is wrong to play God. BP: If we can benefit someone without harming anyone else, we ought to do so.... is fully general. That is, they don t yield verdicts for all possible actions. Fully general principles do.

Fully General Moral Principles Fully general moral principles purport to explain, for any possible action, why it has the moral status it has. They often take this form: an action is morally right if and only if. This is a statement of the necessary and sufficient conditions for an act s being morally right. We can call such principles moral theories.

Moral Theories A sample moral theory: 10C: an act is morally right if and only if it does not violate any of the Ten Commandments. This theory is saying two things: (i) that any act that doesn t violate the Ten Commandments is right -- it s ok to do those. (ii) that any act that does violate the Ten Commandments is not right -- it s wrong to do those.

The Normative Ethics of Behavior The fundamental project of the normative ethics of behavior is to discover a theory like this a statement of the necessary and sufficient conditions for an act s being morally right.

Moral Theories A couple more sample theories: 10C: an act is morally right if and only if it does not violate any of the Ten Commandments. GR: an act is morally right if and only if the agent of the act, in performing the act, treats others as he or she would like to be treated. GHP: an act is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

Refuting Moral Theories To show that some proposed moral theory is not the correct moral theory, one thing we can do is produce a counterexample to the theory. A counterexample is an example that runs counter to a generalization, and thus proves it to be false. For example, consider this generalization: All college students love Miley Cyrus. Does this claim have any counterexamples?

Refuting Moral Theories Let s try to refute 10C: an act is morally right if and only if it does not violate any of the Ten Commandments. by coming up with a counterexample to it. A good kind of counterexample to 10C will be an example (it can be an imaginary one), involving some action, in which: either the act is obviously wrong but 10C implies that it is right or the act is obviously right but 10C implies that it is wrong.

Refuting Moral Theories What about... GR: an act is morally right if and only if the agent of the act, in performing the act, treats others as he or she would like to be treated. Are there any counterexamples to GR?

The Normative Ethics of Behavior For the next several weeks, we will be engaged in the project of discovering and evaluating moral principles -- especially fully general moral theories. Next time... the moral theory that right and wrong are based in God s commands. To read for next time: Mortimer, Morality is Based on God s Commands.