Formal offers pursuant to the VCAT Act Calderbank offers Pros and cons of using formal offers or Calderbank offers

Similar documents
REGISTRATION AND OPT OUT NOTICE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES. DICK SMITH REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS (NOS. 2017/ and 2018/52431)

Submission to the Religious Freedom Review February Independent Schools and Religious Freedom

AT MELBOURNE CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL LIST GENERAL DIVISION Case No. CI

Cobaw Community Health Services Limited v Christian Youth Camps Limited & Anor (Anti-Discrimination) [2010] VCAT 1613 (8 October 2010)

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

LETTER OF CALL AGREEMENT. Date: We are pleased to advise you that the (Congregation) (City, State) (Zip Code)

BYM Terms and Conditions

Daniel Duhovic, Hasan Erlinoglu Melbourne Senior Member D. Cremean Hearing. Shelcon Pty Ltd v Duhovic (Domestic Building) [2007] VCAT 1072

Before DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE OBHI. PARKING EYE LIMITED (Claimant) -v- PAUL D. HEGGIE (Defendant) PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES:

Mount Olive Evangelical Lutheran Church th Ave NW Rochester, MN (507)

INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement

Employment Agreement

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Presbytery of Missouri River Valley Gracious Reconciliation and Dismissal Policy

1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Samaritans Housing Ordinance 2017.

HITCHIN TOWN HALL LTD Registered Charity No:

KIRTLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING AGENDA KIRTLAND HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA

CARING FOR CHURCH LEADERS

BYLAWS OF WHITE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH

Assistant Producer/Presenter Vacancy.

Review of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)

Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

IGNITED IN CHRIST Healing Ministry Setting the Captives free

Limited Tender Enquiry

LEGAL & HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE

AUDIENCE RESPONSE THIRD SESSION

HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO. P123/98

churches and intellectual property

THE CONSTITUTION OF DURAL BAPTIST CHURCH

Policy Type: Governance Policy #1 Status: Final draft dated March 18, 2016

2017 Constitutional Updates. Based upon ELCA Model Constitution adopted 2016 at 14th Church Wide Assembly

S26653 Letter to Instructor Dr. Rolf Auf der Maur VISCHER AG Schuetzengasse 1 PO Box Zurich Switzerland. 23 June 2014.

Cullman Christian School Homeschool Cooperative Programs Application Procedure

COVENANT OF GRACIOUS SEPARATION AND DISMISSAL BY AND BETWEEN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AT LIBERTY CORNER AND THE PRESBYTERY OF ELIZABETH

IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four

Technical Release i -1. Accounting for Zakat on Business

and sexuality, a local church or annual conference may indicate its desire to form or join a self-governing

Sexual. in the workplace. I d have hired her for her looks alone. Did you see the skirt she was wearing today? I could hardly get my work done!

Mission Policy Guideline & Statement

how much is enough? Christian Workers Finance for Living Series Myles Wilson

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

Copyrighted material Loving God with All Your Mind-Interactive Workbook.indd 1 4/15/10 1:48:05 PM

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and

Resolved: The United States should adopt a no first strike policy for cyber warfare.

God's Way Ltd Volunteer Selection Programme

IN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOTICE. August 19, No STAN SMITH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Samaritans Foundation Ordinance 2017.

CA-CRT21 Presbyterian Polity

Norman Palmer INTEGRITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PERTINACITY IN THE TREATMENT OF HOLOCAUST-RELATED ART CLAIMS. Conclusion

NOTICE INVITING QUOTATIONS No (06)/2015-IIMK.GA/

King s Academy Christian School

The Constitution of The Coptic Orthodox Church of Western Australia Incorporated

May 23, Attention:

Reconciliation and Dismissal Procedure

GENERAL SYNOD. AMENDING CANON No. 34

Section 8 - The Clergy Discipline Measure

LAYMAN S GUIDE TO DINEI TORAH (BETH DIN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS)

LONG ISLAND ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH HICKSVILLE, NEW YORK. This church shall be known as the Long Island Abundant Life Church.

Veritas Classical Christian Academy Faculty Application

CONSTITUTION CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH WASHINGTON, D.C. of the

2014 REDSKINS TRAINING CAMP TICKET LOTTERY OFFICIAL RULES

Guideline Leaflet C04: Approved Governing Document

In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech

Brochure of Robin Jeffs Registered Investment Advisor CRD # Ashdown Place Half Moon Bay, CA Telephone (650)

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

COVENANT OF GRACIOUS SEPARATION AND DISMISSAL BY AND BETWEEN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AT NEW PROVIDENCE AND THE PRESBYTERY OF ELIZABETH

COMMENTARIES ON THE ART OF ADVOCACY Hon. John Charles Thomas. complex appeals, served on the Supreme Court of Virginia, served as an

2014 Revision Principles and Processes For The Presbytery of Lake Erie When Churches Seek to Separate From the Presbytery

NATIONAL PROPERTY POLICY FOR THE UNITING CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA

Evangelical Lutheran Church of Papua New Guinea Act 1991.

ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST

TERMS & CONDITIONS NEW YEAR'S EVE 2018/2019 The Great Gatsby at Zamoyski Palace Endorfina Foksal Foksal Street 2, Warsaw on

What matters is living the good life

FAITHFUL DISPUTE RESOLUTION

THE POWERS OF A PARISH MEETING IN A PARISH WITHOUT A SEPARATE PARISH COUNCIL

MEETING OF APRIL 13, 1897.

LUCY V. ZEHMER. 84 S.E.2d 516 (Va. 1954)

5 Ways to Improve Your Readings

BE5502 Course Syllabus

Bank Chains Process in SAP

ARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT Date of award: 31 January In the arbitration between: and

Guideline Leaflet PC10: Hiring of Church Premises

MEMORANDUM. Interested Parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana. From: Covert J. Geary, Chancellor of the Diocese

Victory Bible College International PROSPECTUS DIPLOMA IN THEOLOGY

NON-TEACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION. Position Desired: Schedule Desired: Full-Time Part-Time Substitute Secondary Position Desired:

A Comparison of the Shari ah and the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in International Business Transactions

Please let us known your intentions

God Six sessions from 1 John

The parties. The decision of Chisholm J in 2012

Congregational Field Education Semester 1 & 2, 2015

Quran Revolution Terms & Conditions:

THE SYNOD OF THE ANGLICAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA IN THE DIOCESE OF WILLOCHRA INCORPORATED

Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A

Re: The Education Bill 2011 and schools/academies with a religious character ADVICE TO THE EHRC

Entry Level Certificate

Life Applications - F

Article 1 Name The name of this church is Sovereign Grace Baptist Church of Jacksonville, Inc.

Tax and Legal Guide for Elders: Business Ethics for Church Leaders

Transcription:

Fact Sheet This fact sheet covers: Formal offers pursuant to the VCAT Act Calderbank offers Pros and cons of using formal offers or Calderbank offers This fact sheet provides some general information about how to make formal offers and Calderbank offers in proceedings at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). If you re at VCAT, you can attempt to settle your dispute by issuing a formal offer of compromise or Calderbank offer to the other party. Both types of offers can provide you with some protection if you incur costs unnecessarily because the other party unreasonably failed to accept your offer. It s up to you to decide if you want to make an offer and, if you do, what type of offer you make. If you re a party to a VCAT proceeding, you can make a settlement offer pursuant to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (VCAT Act) at any time before VCAT makes its orders on the matters in dispute. If you want to make a formal offer you have to make sure the offer complies with the requirements of the VCAT Act. Because these offers have to comply with the VCAT Act, they are sometimes called formal offers. We ve summarised the requirements for formal offers in this section of our fact sheet. 1.1 With prejudice or without prejudice? Formal offers can be made with prejudice or without prejudice. If you make your settlement offer: with prejudice this means that any party to the proceeding can refer to the offer, including the terms of the offer, at any time during the proceeding. without prejudice this means that VCAT is not able to be told about the offer until after VCAT has made its orders Under the VCAT Act, if a settlement offer doesn t specify whether it is made with or without prejudice, it will be treated as if it had been made without prejudice. 1

about the matters in dispute (other than orders in respect of costs). It is important to use without prejudice so you and the other side can talk freely and try to reach an agreement, without worrying that your offer could be used against you later. For example, in your offer you might say I will accept $10,000 to settle this case, but you ask VCAT to award you $20,000. It could be unhelpful for your case if VCAT knew you would accept $10,000. 1.2 Formal requirements applicable to settlement offers Sections 112, 113, 114 and 115 of the VCAT Act set out what is required if you want to make a formal offer. You can find a copy of the VCAT Act on the Victoria law today library by clicking Acts and searching under the letter V (for Victorian ). 1.2.1 Is it a formal offer? If you re going to make a formal offer you should say this in your offer. For example, you could say: This settlement offer is made without prejudice and is made in accordance with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic). 1.2.2 How long does an offer have to be open for acceptance? You can choose how long you want your offer to be open for acceptance by the other party, but your offer has to be open until: immediately before VCAT makes orders on the matters in dispute; or the expiry of the time period you put in your offer. If you set out an expiry time in your offer, it has to be at least 14 days after the date you make your offer. For example, you could say: This settlement offer is open for acceptance by the [party name] for 14 days after the date this settlement offer is made. ; or Because the other party can accept your offer, even if they have made a counter-offer, it can be a good idea to include an expiry date in your offer, rather than keep the offer open until VCAT decides your case. This settlement offer is open for acceptance by [party name] until [date]. 1.2.3 Can you withdraw a formal offer? You can t withdraw a formal offer while it s open for acceptance unless you get VCAT s permission. If you ask VCAT for permission to withdraw your offer, a VCAT member can look at the terms of your offer even if it was made without prejudice. If a VCAT Member looks at your without prejudice offer, a different VCAT Member will have to hear the rest of your case. 2

1.2.4 Can you make more than one offer? You can make more than one settlement offer. It s also possible for you to serve a combination of formal offers under the VCAT Act and Calderbank offers. If you do this remember to include expiry dates in your offers! 1.2.5 Offers involving the payment of money If your settlement offer sets out that one party will pay the other party, your offer will need to set out when the money is going to be paid. For example, you could say: The Respondent will pay the Applicant $[x] (Settlement Sum) in full and final settlement of the Applicant s claim. The Settlement Sum shall be paid to the Applicant within [x] days of the date of acceptance of this offer. 1.2.6 Defective offers If you make an offer which doesn t comply with the requirements of the VCAT Act (for example, because you didn t leave the offer open for a long enough time), in some cases the offer can still be treated as a Calderbank offer. 1.3 What happens if the other party accepts my formal offer? The other party must accept your offer by giving you a signed notice of acceptance. If the other party accepts your offer, you have to do what you said you would do in your offer. If you don t do what you said you would, the other party can ask VCAT to: make an order giving effect to the terms of the offer, or if you started the VCAT proceeding (i.e. you are the Applicant ): dismiss the proceeding, or if the party that accepted your offer made a counterclaim before you made your offer, make an order awarding any or all of the things they requested in their counterclaim, or if the other party started the VCAT proceeding (i.e. you are the Respondent ): make an order awarding the builder any or all of the things they asked for in their VCAT application. 1.4 What happens if the other party rejects your formal offer? Usually in VCAT proceedings each party has to pay their own legal costs. This means, if you hire a lawyer, you have to pay for that lawyer s help. But if you: make an offer that complies with the the VCAT Act the other party doesn t accept the offer, and VCAT makes orders which aren t better than what you offered, If you are self-representing, you won t incur your own legal costs. But, if the other party has a lawyer and serves an offer on you, which you don t accept, you might have to pay their legal fees if they get a more favourable outcome than their offer. 3

then VCAT can make the other party pay all costs that you incurred after you made the offer. 1.4.1 What does all costs mean? All costs doesn t always mean the other party will have to pay all your legal costs after you made the offer. This is because VCAT can make an order that the other party pay your costs in different ways, these include: Solicitor/client costs means what a lawyer charges their client for legal help. Party/party costs means the amount VCAT orders one party to pay the other. VCAT works this out by applying a costs scale, unless you and the other party agree to another way to calculate the costs. Costs on an indemnity basis means all costs, except when they were unreasonably incurred or are an unreasonable amount. A Calderbank offer is another kind of settlement offer. It s an offer made without prejudice save as to costs. This means that the person who made the offer can tell VCAT about it when VCAT is deciding whether to make a costs award. This is because there should be consequences for a party that rejects a reasonable offer, and doesn t get a better award than what the offer set out. The name Calderbank comes from an English Court of Appeal decision called Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93, which considered a settlement offer. Remember: VCAT always has a discretion about whether to award costs, and if so, how the costs will be awarded. Just because the other party didn t accept your offer and didn t get a better result than your offer, doesn t mean you will automatically get an indemnity costs order. Making a Calderbank offer is just one factor that might trigger VCAT s discretion to make a costs award under section 109 of the VCAT Act. 2.1 What is an unreasonable rejection? If you say the other party should have accepted your offer, you have to show VCAT that the other party s failure to accept your offer was unreasonable. VCAT will look at things like: when you made your offer how long the other party had to think about your offer the extent of the compromise you offered the other party s chances of winning the case after you made your offer how clear your offer was, and 4

whether your offer said you would ask VCAT to award you indemnity costs if the other party rejected it, to work out whether the rejection of your offer was unreasonable in the circumstances 1 and to decide whether to make a costs award in your favour. 2.1.1 Your offer should involve a "real and genuine element of compromise The extent of the compromise you set out in your offer is a really important factor VCAT will look at to work out whether or not it was unreasonable for the other party to reject it. For example, if your claim is for $10,000, and your offer is to accept $10,000 instead of being a compromise, your offer would just be re-stating your full claim. NOTE: Genunine offers don t just include the offer of a cash settlement. Sometimes, they can include an offer to walk away with each party paying their own costs. Offers must not amount to a demand to capitulate (i.e. a demand for the other party to admit defeat) or a token amount. Instead, they need to represent a serious endeavour to resolve the proceedings. 2 2.2 Drafting Calderbank offers TIPS There aren t any strict rules about the wording to use when drafting a Calderbank offer, but here are some tips to consider: State that your offer is made without prejudice save as to costs. Clearly sets out what you will do and what the other party will do. Make sure the terms of your offer are clear and unambigiuous - your offer should be capable of immediate acceptance without the other party needing to ask you questions about it. Include reasons why the offer should be accepted, and why it would be unreasonable for the other party to reject it. If your offer doesn t seem like much of a compromise (e.g. if your claim is for $10,000, but you offer to accept $9,500), you need to be really clear about what the compromise you are making is, and why it would be unreasonable for the other party not to accept it. Clearly state the claims, causes of action and counterclaims covered by the offer (e.g. if it relates to all the things in dispute in your proceeding, say this). The offer should be unconditional and a genuine attempt to settle the dispute. Your offer must be open for acceptance for a reasonable period of time. Your offer must make provision for costs separate from the principle offer. Make sure you set out what will happen if the other party doesn t accept your offer (e.g. you will see an order for indemnity costs). 1 The test about unreasonable rejection comes from a case called Hazeldene s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435. 2 Kermani v Gaylard & Ors (No 2) [2011] VSC 143 5

2.3 Which kind of offer should you make? If you need flexibility a Calderbank offer could be a good choice for you. For example, even though Calderbank offers are usually left open for at least 14 days (the minumum time a formal offer has to be kept open), if time is critical, your Calderbank offer could be kept open for less time. If a costs award is really important to you a formal offer could be a good choice for you. It s really important to remember that there isn t an automatic entitlement to a costs order just because the other party rejects your offer. Both types of offers can lead to a costs award, but you might choose to use a formal offer under the VCAT Act, if you want more certain consequences. In Velardo v Andonov [2010] VSCA 38 the Court found that settlement offers which comply with the requirements of the VCAT Act fall within the scope of the statutory regime and promote certainty and fairness. This means that VCAT may look at the substance of the offer, not just its form just because you call an offer a Calderbank offer, won t mean it s not a formal offer. Please take the time to give us some feedback by completing a quick survey here. Your comments and suggestions will help us to develop tailored content in the future. A Domestic Building Legal Service resource. Access more resources at www.justiceconnect.org.au/building 2018 Justice Connect. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material for your personal use, or non-commercial use, so long as you attribute Justice Connect as author and retain this and other copyright notices. You may not modify this resource. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), all other rights are reserved. To request permission from Justice Connect to use this material, contact Justice Connect at PO Box 16013, Collins Street West, Melbourne 8007, or email domesticbuilding@justiceconnect.org.au. 6