yes Head of chain in posidon where Case is assigned Head of chain in posidon where theta- role is assigned Foot of chain in posidon no somedmes

Similar documents
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 November 6, 2000 Paul Hagstrom Week 9: Binding Theory. (8) John likes him.

Introduction to Transformational Grammar, LINGUIST 601 December 3, Wh-Movement

WH-Movement. Ling 322 Read Syntax, Ch. 11

The Development of Binding Theory Handout #1

Long-distance anaphora: comparing Mandarin Chinese with Iron Range English 1

Logophors, variable binding and the interpretation of have. *

Final Exam due on December 13, 2001

Be Bound or Be Disjoint! Andrew Kehler and Daniel Büring. UCSD and UCLA

Extra Syntax Exercises 5

Anaphora Resolution in Biomedical Literature: A

CAS LX 523 Syntax II February 10, 2009 Prep for week 5: The fine structure of the left periphery

Solutions for Assignment 1

Exhaustification over Questions in Japanese

Reconsidering Raising and Experiencers in English

Topics in Linguistic Theory: Propositional Attitudes

Outline of today s lecture

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Could have done otherwise, action sentences and anaphora

HS01: The Grammar of Anaphora: The Study of Anaphora and Ellipsis An Introduction. Winkler /Konietzko WS06/07

WH- MOVEMENT IN PALESTINIAN ARABIC

Wittgenstein s The First Person and Two-Dimensional Semantics

Discourse Constraints on Anaphora Ling 614 / Phil 615 Sponsored by the Marshall M. Weinberg Fund for Graduate Seminars in Cognitive Science

hates the woman [who rejected him i hates the woman [who rejected Peter i ] is hated by him i ] (Langacker 1969: 169) (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (4) a. S b.

The Structure Of Argument 8th Edition

BBC LEARNING ENGLISH The Grammar Gameshow

A Problem for a Direct-Reference Theory of Belief Reports. Stephen Schiffer New York University

part one MACROSTRUCTURE Cambridge University Press X - A Theory of Argument Mark Vorobej Excerpt More information

Coreference Resolution Lecture 15: October 30, Reference Resolution

ILLOCUTIONARY ORIGINS OF FAMILIAR LOGICAL OPERATORS

Subject Anaphors: Exempt or Not Exempt?

Reductio ad Absurdum, Modulation, and Logical Forms. Miguel López-Astorga 1

Identifying Anaphoric and Non- Anaphoric Noun Phrases to Improve Coreference Resolution

Toward a Feature-Movement Theory. of Long-Distance Anaphora. Norvin Richards MIT April A number of recent versions of binding theory have been

The Whys and How Comes of Presupposition and NPI Licensing in Questions

Anaphoric Deflationism: Truth and Reference

ASL is non-indo-european Sign languages are natural, have native speakers Phonology and processes (e.g. assimilation) Morphology Syntax

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

Dialogue structure as a preference in anaphora resolution systems

An Introduction to Anaphora

Was Justice Served? In popular legend, the knights of King Arthur s Round Table are chivalrous knights

Speaking My Mind: Expression and Self-Knowledge by Dorit Bar-On

Sloppy Identity in Surface and Deep Anaphora Hajime Hoji University of Southern California

How to Study the Bible by John MacArthur

Morality, Our Lived Faith

On An Alleged Non-Equivalence Between Dispositions And Disjunctive Properties

Course Syllabus Spring and Summer School 2012 INTRODUCTION TO BIBLICAL HEBREW [HEBR 1013 & 1023] HEBREW GRAMMAR I & II [OLDT 0611 & 0612]

ANAPHORIC REFERENCE IN JUSTIN BIEBER S ALBUM BELIEVE ACOUSTIC

What is Heaven Like?

Philosophers of language have lavished attention on names and other singular referring

USING THIS CURRICULUM

OUTLINES. The skeleton of a successful essay!

Comments on Lasersohn

Contextual two-dimensionalism

A Freezing Approach to the Ish-Construction in English

The Transmission of God s Word: Gender and Bible Choice

Durham Research Online

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

ZHANG Yan-qiu, CHEN Qiang. Changchun University, Changchun, China

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Inductive Bible Study Observation. Bible Chant: Psalms 34:8 Taste and see that the Lord is good; blessed is the man who takes refuge in him.

German Free Datives and Knight Move Binding *

Basics Of Verbal Aspect In Biblical Greek PDF

Houston Graduate School of Theology I. Course Description II. Student Learning Outcomes III. Textbook Required Textbook

Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners

Extraposition and Covert Movement

Aboutness and Justification

February fphope.com/middleschool

An introduction to grammatical-relation changing processes

ESL 340: Noun Clauses. Week 5, Thur. 2/15/18 Todd Windisch, Spring 2018

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!

Syllabus for GBIB 611 Theology of the Old Testament 3 Credit Hours Fall 2015

ADVENT PREPARE LUKE 2:21-24 DECEMBER 14, 2014

Reflection on what was said about coercion above might suggest an alternative to PAP:

Presupposition Projection and Anaphora in Quantified Sentences

Christian Initiation Additional Texts in Accessible Language

COMMUNITY. Submit!!!!!

Intersubstitutivity Principles and the Generalization Function of Truth. Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh. Shawn Standefer University of Melbourne

Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic

ACD in AP? Richard K. Larson. Stony Brook University

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic?

Competition and Disjoint Reference. Norvin Richards, MIT. appear; Richards 1995). The typical inability of pronouns to be locally bound, on this

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

Published in Analysis 61:1, January Rea on Universalism. Matthew McGrath

NT 614 Exegesis of the Gospel of Mark

Seeing With Spiritual Eyes. Mark 2:1-12

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP DRT: Constructing LFs and Presuppositions

Table of Contents 1-30

JESUS AT THE FUNERAL IN NAIN. July 29, 2018 Luke 7: Robert Jones

Class #9 - The Attributive/Referential Distinction

Quantificational logic and empty names

Step 2: Multiply both the numerator and the denominator. Remember that you can multiply numbers

21L.004 Reading Poetry

Confirmation Preparation 40 QUESTIONS FOR CANDIDATES (and Sponsors)

the aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)

I m Healed. Lesson at a Glance

Quine on the analytic/synthetic distinction

Summary: Hierarchy effects in morpho-syntax

Transcription:

More on Movement 1

A- movement A - movement Head of chain in posidon where Case is assigned yes no Head of chain in posidon where theta- role is assigned no no Foot of chain in posidon where Case is assigned no somedmes (if the moved element is an adjunct, there is no Case at the foot of the chain) Foot of chain in posidon where theta- role is assigned somedmes (if the moved element is an expletive, there is no theta -role at the foot of the chain) somedmes (if the moved element is an adjunct, there is no theta -role at the foot of the chain) 2

The previous differences between A and A - movement follow from their general properdes, which we already know. There are many other differences between them. Here is one of my favorites. What does (1) mean? 1. Who thinks that Mary likes him? and (2): 2. Who i thinks that Mary likes him i? 3. For which person x: x thinks that Mary likes x 3

Now look at (4): 4. Who does his mother like? (4) is grammatical but it can only have the indexing in (5), not in (6). If the indexing in (6) were possible, (4) would have the meaning in (7,8), which it does not. 5. Who i does his k mother like? 6. * Whoi does his i mother like? 7. For which x does x s mother love x? 8. Who is loved by his own mother? 4

So the configuration in (9) leads to ungrammaticality: 9.* WH k.. [..pron k.].t k [..pron k.] indicates that the pronoun is contained inside a considtuent and does not c-command out. That is, the pronoun does not c-command the trace t k. A WH- word cannot cross over a coindexed pronoun that does not c- command the trace of the WH- word. 5

How do we know that movement (i.e. the crossover) is necessary for the violadon? 10.Who i likes his i mother? 11.Who i thinks his i mother is nice? 4. *Who i does his i mother like? no crossover à no violadon Weak Cross Over violadon (WCO): 12. * WH k.. [..pron k.].t k 6

If you are wondering why it is called Weak CO: it is in opposidon to Strong Cross Over (SCO). In SCO, unlike in WCO, the pronoun does c-command the trace of movement. Can you think of SCO violadng sentences? 13. Who does he like? 14. Who does he think Mary likes? (13, 14) are fine sentences but only on the indexing in (13,14 ), not the indexing in (13, 14 ), which would have led to the unavailable readings in (15,16). 13. Who i does he k like? 14. Who i does he k think Mary likes? 7

13. * Who i does he i like? 14. Who i does he i think Mary likes? * 15a. For which x, x likes x b. Who likes himself? 16a. For which x, x thinks that Mary likes x? b. Who i thinks that Mary likes him i? 8

Strong Cross Over violadon: 17.Wh i. pron i t i And again we can check that the crossing over is crucial: 18. Who i believes that Mary likes him i? Can you see what SCO might be reducible to? Binding CondiDon C! 9

So, what we see is that WH- movement (A - movement) is subject to WCO and SCO. Is A- movement subject to WCO? What sentences should we create to find out if it is? This will take a bit to set up, so please bear with me. Remember the general profile of WCO: 19. α i [.pron i.] t i 10

Remember: 20. It seems that he is the best candidate 21. He seems to be the best candidate What is the derivadonal reladonship between these two sentences? 21. He k seems [ t k to be the best candidate] Now look at these: 22. It seems to me that he is the best candidate the experiencer 23. He seems to me to be the best candidate 24. He k seems to me [ t k to be the best candidate] 11

So now we have the posidon in which we can place the cross- overed pronoun: (in) the experiencer. What do we need to ensure in order to decide whether we are dealing with WCO or SCO? We need to see whether the pronoun c- commands the trace of movement (SCO) or not (WCO). How can we check whether the pronoun would c-command the posidon of the trace? CondiDon C! 12

So what is our test sentence? 25. * It seems to him k that John k is the best candidatet 26. It seems to him k that John m is the best candidate So the pronoun in the experiencer does c-command (ignore for right now how the the experiencer can c-command out of the PP headed by ). So when the pronoun gets crossed over, what sort of configuradon are we creadng? SCO or WCO? 27. * John k seems to him k [t k to be the best candidate] Is (27) good or bad? 13

So A- movement, like A - movement, is subject to SCO, which is not suprising at all if SCO is nothing other than Binding CondiDon C. What about WCO? What would be the right sentence to test whether A- movement objects to WCO configuradons? 14

28. It seems to [his mother] that John is the best candidate. 29. It seems to [his k mother] that John m is the best candidate. 30. It seems to [his k mother] that John k is the best candidate. So we now have the right sentence to check whether A-movement is subject to WCO! How do we proceed? 31. John k seems to [his k mother] [t k to be the best candidate. 15

So! A - movement is subject to WCO violadons. A-movement is not! 32. α i [.pron i.] t i - bad if α i t i is an A - chain - fine if α i t i is an A- chain 16

Let s look at the type of sentences that we created along the way and see if there is something else we want to say about them. 33. It seems to him k that he k is the best candidate 34. * He k seems to him k to be the best candidate What can we conclude? A- movement feeds Binding Theory! A- movement creates new antecedents for BT. 17

35. *It seems to herself k that Mary k is the best candidate 36. Mary k seems to herself k [t k to be the best candidate] What about the following pair: 37. It seems to John k s mother that he k is the best candidate 38. *He k seems to John k s mother to be the best candidate. 18

So A- movement creates new antecedents for Binding. Which means that Binding Theory applies (at least also) a6er A- movement takes place. 19

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.902 / 24.932 Language and its Structure II: Syntax Fall 2015 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.