The Art of Critical Thinking

Similar documents
The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1

I think, therefore I am. - Rene Descartes

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo

1. Clarity: Understandable, the meaning can be grasped; free from confusion or ambiguity; to remove obscurities.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE IDEA OF CRITICAL THINKING

What s all the fuss about? Jim Skypeck, MA, MLIS

CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

A-LEVEL Religious Studies

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Critical Thinking Glossary: Guide to Critical Thinking Terms and Concepts

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Moving from Analysis to Evaluation. Or, Well, it s my opinion isn t enough anymore

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice Andrés Perea Excerpt More information

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Logical Appeal (Logos)

What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me?

Syllabus Fall 2014 PHIL 2010: Introduction to Philosophy 11:30-12:45 TR, Allgood Hall 257

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES

The Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works

Prologue Critical Thinking/Active Learning

Common Core Standards for English Language Arts & Draft Publishers' Criteria for History/Social Studies

AS-LEVEL Religious Studies

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy

How to Read a Paragraph

Russell: On Denoting

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit III

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 3 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 3

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Philosophy. Aim of the subject

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS

PSY 202 Sample 2. Question/Prompt: It is logical that others see us differently than we see ourselves, and there is

Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism?

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Debating Human Rights

Learning Ladder Philosophy and Ethics

CONSCIOUSNESS, INTENTIONALITY AND CONCEPTS: REPLY TO NELKIN

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life

In Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

A New Parameter for Maintaining Consistency in an Agent's Knowledge Base Using Truth Maintenance System

12 Bible Course Map--2013

Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)

Everything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument

Basic Christianity. Week Three. The Holy Spirit

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Tom Conway, Colorado State University, Department of English Spring 2015 Context: Assignment 2: Sustainable Spaceship Argument Overview sustainably

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and

I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please.

A CONSEQUENTIALIST RESPONSE TO THE DEMANDINGNESS OBJECTION Nicholas R. Baker, Lee University THE DEMANDS OF ACT CONSEQUENTIALISM

studyıng phılosophy: a brıght ıdea

Philosophy 1100 Honors Introduction to Ethics

Date Morning/Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Commentary on Descartes' Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy *

To what extent should we embrace the ideological perspective(s) reflected in the source?

xi Chapter One Defining Reality 1 Chapter Two Surprised by What They Believe 23 Chapter Three Domain One: Learning the Truth:

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams

Section 4. Attainment Targets. About the attainment targets

Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

Prompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

GROW AN SMBS SERIES. Lesson 11 The Right Means: Fellowship Teacher Edition

AS Religious Studies. RSS01 Religion and Ethics 1 Mark scheme June Version: 1.0 Final

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships

VIEWING PERSPECTIVES

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Religion 12: In Search of the Good

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Practical Intuition: How To Harness The Power Of Your Instinct And Make It Work For You PDF

the negative reason existential fallacy

Are Practical Reasons Like Theoretical Reasons?

Introduction Questions to Ask in Judging Whether A Really Causes B

United States History and Geography: Modern Times

Jerusalem s Status in the Tenth-Ninth Centuries B.C.E. Around 1000 B.C.E., King David of the Israelites moved his capital from its previous

INTRODUCTION: CHARISMA AND RELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP DOUGLAS A. HICKS

2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications

WHAT IS ETHICS? KEY DISTINCTIONS:

Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

Today s Tasks. 1. Argument 2. Fallacies: a. Ad Hominem b. Straw Man c. Appeal to ignorance d. Begging the Question

Rawls s veil of ignorance excludes all knowledge of likelihoods regarding the social

An Interview with Susan Gelman

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

King and Kitchener Packet 3 King and Kitchener: The Reflective Judgment Model

Home Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: (H) ( ) - (C) ( ) - Current Address (If different from above)

Guiding Principles Updated February 22, 2012

Transcription:

The Art of Critical Thinking

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle

Why Think Critically? Society is becoming more polarized every day. News pundits on both sides of every issue try to convince us they are right. We are bombarded with more information on a daily basis than our ancestors might have experienced in a lifetime. The average person sees/hears close to 3000 pieces of advertising every day. We need to be able to make sense of all this data.

Schools now teach students WHAT to think, not HOW to think. Einstein thought that learning HOW to think was even more important than being taught the knowledge in one s particular field (Ideas & Opinions).

We need to be able to: Identify Analyze Evaluate Reason about Arguments: Visual & Verbal In order to come to responsible conclusions & make intelligent decisions to present convincing premises to support our conclusions

What critical thinking is NOT: Biased Uninformed Distorted Prejudiced Partial Egocentric

It is also not: Thinking a lot! One can think long and hard and uncritically, or one can make conclusions and decisions based on thinking at length but using faulty premises.

What IS Critical Thinking? Critical thinking is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking and issues with a view to making improvements and increasing understanding. Dr. Richard Paul

Remember: It takes practice to become a critical thinker!

Critical thinking involves: Evaluating information through employing diverse skills like: Analyzing Conceptualizing Listening Asking questions Reasoning Defining Refining our thought processes Examining Synthesizing

Universal Intellectual Standards Clarity Accuracy Precision Relevance Depth Breadth Logic Does it make sense?

Clarity We must harness our ingenuity and come together to confront and overcome the challenges we face. WHAT??? What does this mean? How do you make sense of it? ALWAYS ASK QUESTIONS ALWAYS ASK FOR CLARIFICATION

Accuracy Make sure the information you are receiving is correct. Chickens are mammals. Well, that is clear, but it is not accurate. VERIFY THE FACTS

Precision An idea can be clear and accurate but not precise. Be specific and make sure the information you receive is specific, too. For example: That is too heavy may be a clear and accurate statement, but it could be more precise. That is 15 pounds over the allotted weight limit is much more precise.

Relevance An idea can be clear, accurate, and precise but not relevant to the issue. For example: We need a photographer for this job. I can take photos. I can also process film. Sorry. We need someone with experience in digital photography. Your ability is not relevant here.

Depth Often, ideas are oversimplified. For example: when discussing the drug problem in America, one response is the Just Say No campaign. This solution overlooks any problems or issues and lacks any real depth of thought.

Breadth When thinking lacks breadth, it fails to consider any other points of view, as when something is egocentric or socio-centric. Ask yourself: AM I CONSIDERING ALL SIDES HERE? IS IT FAIR? Reason at the highest quality level possible in a fair-minded way.

A Critical Thinker: Raises vital questions and formulates them clearly Gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret effectively Thinks open-mindedly and remains open to change Comes to well-reasoned conclusions Communicates his/her thoughts effectively

Three Levels of Thought Level 3 Highest order: *explicitly reflective * highest skill level routine use of critical thinking tools * consistently fair Level 2 Higher order: *selectively reflective * high skill level *lacking critical thinking vocabulary * inconsistently fair *may be skilled in sophistry Level 1 Lower order: *unreflective * low/mixed skill level *frequently relies on gut feelings *self-serving or self-deceived *seemingly plausible but actually invalid or misleading reasoning

Stages of Critical Thinking Development Accomplished: Critical skills have become second nature Advanced: Skills are beginning to be internalized Practicing: Skills are advancing nicely Beginning: Trying to improve, but without regular practice or skills Challenged: Significant problems with thinking Unreflective: Unaware of problems with our thinking; ego-centered

The Problem with Egocentric Thinking IT S TRUE BECAUSE I BELIEVE IT Innate egocentrism. I assume that what I believe is true without questioning any biases ( I m right because my beliefs must be right ). IT S TRUE BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IT Innate sociocentrism. My groups beliefs are true even though I have never questioned them ( my country right or wrong ). IT S TRUE BECAUSE I WANT TO BELIEVE IT & WE VE ALWAYS DONE IT THIS WAY Innate wish fulfillment. I must put my beliefs in a positive light. What feels good to me does not require me to change my thinking or admit I might be wrong ( We ve always done it this way ). IT S TRUE BECAUSE IT S IN MY OWN INTEREST TO BELIEVE IT Innate selfishness. Whatever justifies my getting more power, money, or advantage is what I will believe ( Poor people are all lazy. If they worked harder, they would succeed ).

The Problem of Socio-centric Thinking Challenged critical thinkers tend to internalize the dominant prejudices of their society or culture without question. They tend to: place their own culture, nation, religion above all others select self-serving, negative descriptions of those who are different internalize group norms and beliefs blindly conform to group restrictions fail to think beyond cultural or religious prejudices fail to distinguish universal ethics fail to think how other cultures are also shaped by their own prejudices fail to think historically or anthropologically fail to see socio-centric thinking as an impediment to learning

A Critical Thinking Exercise: Challenging Our Assumptions & Values Pretend that you have been assigned the task of conducting a tour for aliens who are visiting earth and observing human life. You're riding along in a blimp, and you float over a professional baseball stadium. One of your aliens looks down and becomes very confused, so you tell him that there is a game going on. Try to answer the following questions for him: What is a game? Why are there no female players? Why do people get so passionate watching other people play games? What is a team? Why can't the people in the seats just go down on the field and join in?

Using Art to Develop Critical Thinking Skills What is the purpose of this piece of art? Am I raising the right questions when I evaluate this art? What information am I using to draw my conclusions? Is it accurate? What information do I still need to make an informed evaluation? Is there another way to interpret this piece? Am I looking at this from an egocentric or socio-centric position? Are my own biases getting in the way of my evaluation? What am I taking for granted? What assumptions am I making? Should I consider another point of view?

Finally: A critical thinker tries to always remain open to new ideas and interpretations of situations, has the ability to admit when he or she is wrong, and is willing to let go of old ideas if they turn out to be wrong.

Contact Us! Our Website: www.untdallas.edu/wc Our Email: learningcommons@untdallas.edu Like Us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/untdlearningcommons