LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Similar documents
Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Logical Reasoning. 9/14/2017 Logical Reasoning

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic

Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

INHISINTERESTINGCOMMENTS on my paper "Induction and Other Minds" 1

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Proofs of Non-existence

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

Instructor s Manual 1

Intuitive evidence and formal evidence in proof-formation

The Argumentative Essay

Critical Thinking is:

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument

PHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Must we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything?

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Introduction to Philosophy

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Logical (formal) fallacies

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

HIGH CONFIRMATION AND INDUCTIVE VALIDITY

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 2. Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Philosophical Arguments

PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge

Hume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Critical Thinking - Section 1

VERITAS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Review. Philosophy; Page 1 of The Royal Institute of Philosophy,

Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic By R.A. Neidorf READ ONLINE

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Chapter Seven The Structure of Arguments

Conditionals IV: Is Modus Ponens Valid?

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

THE INFERENCE TO THE BEST

NON-NUMERICAL APPROACHES TO PLAUSIBLE INFERENCE

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Paley s Inductive Inference to Design

Introduction to Philosophy

A short introduction to formal logic

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Chapter Notes (Final Exam) On April, 26, 2012

Module 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests

Inductive inference is. Rules of Detachment? A Little Survey of Induction

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

Test Item File. Full file at

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

In essence, Swinburne's argument is as follows:

Logical behaviourism

Thought, Selections CHAPTER 16. Gilbert Harman. Knowledge and Probability

David E. Alexander and Daniel Johnson, eds. Calvinism and the Problem of Evil.

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

Transcription:

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

Deductive Vs. Inductive If the conclusion is claimed to follow with strict certainty or necessity, the argument is said to be deductive; but if it is claimed to follow only probably, the argument is inductive.

Deductive Arguments DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT: An argument incorporating the claim that it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. Deductive arguments are those that involve necessary reasoning.

Deductive Argument Example The meerkat is a member of the mongoose family. All members of the mongoose family are carnivores. Therefore, it necessarily follows that the meerkat is a carnivore.

Inductive Arguments INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT: An argument incorporating the claim that it is improbable that the conclusion be false given that the premises are true. Inductive arguments involve probabilistic reasoning.

Inductive Argument Example The meerkat is closely related to the suricat. The suricat thrives on beetle larvae. Therefore, probably the meerkat thrives on beetle larvae.

Deductive Vs. Inductive In deciding whether an argument is inductive or deductive, we look to certain objective features of the argument: 1. the occurrence of special indicator words 2. the actual strength of the inferential link between premises and conclusion 3. the form or style of argumentation.

Deductive Argument Indicator Words Necessarily Certainly Absolutely Definitely

Inductive Argument Indicator Words Probably Improbable Plausible Implausible Likely Unlikely Reasonable to Conclude

Inductive Vs. Deductive Indicator Words Inductive and deductive indicator words often suggest the correct interpretation However, if they conflict with one of the other criteria (discussed shortly), we should probably ignore them. Arguers often use phrases such as it certainly follows that for rhetorical purposes to add impact to their conclusion and not to suggest that the argument be taken as deductive. Similarly, some arguers, not knowing the distinction between inductive and deductive, will claim to deduce a conclusion when their argument is more correctly interpreted as inductive.

Deductive Argument Forms Many arguments have a distinctive character or form that indicates that the premises are supposed to provide absolute support for the conclusion. Five examples of such forms or kinds of argumentation are: arguments based on mathematics arguments from definition categorical syllogisms hypothetical syllogisms disjunctive syllogisms

Arguments Based on Mathematics ARGUMENT BASED ON MATHEMATICS: An argument in which the conclusion depends on some purely arithmetic or geometric computation or measurement. Since all arguments in pure mathematics are deductive, we can usually consider arguments that depend on mathematics to be deductive as well. A noteworthy exception, however, is arguments that depend on statistics.

Arguments From Definition ARGUMENT FROM DEFINITION: An argument in which the conclusion is claimed to depend merely on the definition of some word or phrase used in the premise or conclusion.

A syllogism, in general, is an argument consisting of exactly two premises and one conclusion.

Categorical Syllogisms CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM: A syllogism in which each statement begins with one of the words all, no, or some..

Categorical Syllogisms Example All ancient forests are sources of wonder. Some ancient forests are targets of the timber industry. Therefore, some sources of wonder are targets of the timber industry.

Hypothetical Syllogisms HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM: A syllogism having a conditional ( if... then ) statement for one or both of its premises.

Hypothetical Syllogisms Examples If estate taxes are abolished, then wealth will accumulate disproportionately. If wealth accumulates disproportionately, then democracy will be threatened. Therefore, if estate taxes are abolished, then democracy will be threatened. PURE HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM

Hypothetical Syllogisms Examples If Fox News is a propaganda machine, then it misleads its viewers. Fox News is a propaganda machine. Therefore, Fox News misleads its viewers. MIXED HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM

Disjunctive Syllogisms DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM: A syllogism having a disjunctive ( either... or... ) statement.

Disjunctive Syllogisms Examples Either global warming will be arrested, or hurricanes will become more intense. Global warming will not be arrested. Therefore, hurricanes will become more intense.

Inductive Argument Forms In general, inductive arguments are such that the content of the conclusion is in some way intended to go beyond the content of the premises.

Inductive Argument Forms The premises of such an argument typically deal with some subject that is relatively familiar, and the conclusion then moves beyond this to a subject that is less familiar or that little is known about. Such an argument may take any of several forms: Predictions about the future Arguments from Analogy Inductive Generalizations Arguments from Authority Arguments based on Signs Causal Inferences

Predictions PREDICTION: An argument that proceeds from our knowledge of the past to a claim about the future.

Argument from Analogy ARGUMENT FROM ANALOGY: An argument that depends on the existence of an analogy, or similarity, between two things or states of affairs.

Generalization GENERALIZATION: An argument that proceeds from the knowledge of a selected sample to some claim about the whole group.

Arguments from Authority GENERALIZATION: An argument that concludes something is true because a presumed expert or witness has said that it is.

Arguments Based on Signs ARGUMENT BASED ON SIGNS: An argument that proceeds from the knowledge of a sign to a claim about the thing or situation that the sign symbolizes.

Causal Inferences ARGUMENT BASED ON SIGNS: An argument that proceeds from knowledge of a cause to a claim about an effect, or, conversely, from knowledge of an effect to a claim about a cause.

Particular Vs. General Statements PARTICULAR STATEMENT: A statement that makes a claim about one or more particular members of a class. GENERAL STATEMENT: A statement that makes a claim about all the members of a class.

General Vs Particular Examples Three is a prime number. Five is a prime number. DEDUCTIVE Particular General Seven is a prime number. Therefore, all odd numbers between two and eight are prime numbers.

General Vs Particular Examples Gabriel is a wolf. Gabriel has a tail. DEDUCTIVE Particular Particular Therefore, Gabriel s tail is the tail of a wolf.

General Vs Particular Examples All emeralds previously found have been green. Therefore, the next emerald to be found will be green. INDUCTIVE General Particular