Multiple Regression-FORCED-ENTRY HIERARCHICAL MODEL Dennessa Gooden/ Samantha Okegbe COM 631/731 Spring 2018 Data: Film & TV Usage 2015 I. MODEL.

Similar documents
Lampiran 1. Daftar Sampel Reksa dana campuran syariah

Sociology Exam 1 Answer Key February 18, 2011

This is certainly a time series. We can see very strong patterns in the correlation matrix. This comes out in this form...

This is certainly a time series. We can see very strong patterns in the correlation matrix. This comes out in this form...

Okay, good afternoon everybody. Hope everyone can hear me. Ronet, can you hear me okay?

In Our Own Words 2000 Research Study

Factors related to students focus on God

Factors related to students spiritual orientations

It is One Tailed F-test since the variance of treatment is expected to be large if the null hypothesis is rejected.

The Role of Islamic Accounting in the Banking. Development of Islamic countries. Case: Iraqi Islamic Banks

Supplement to: Aksoy, Ozan Motherhood, Sex of the Offspring, and Religious Signaling. Sociological Science 4:

Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies

Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Chapter V. Conclusion and Suggestion

CONGREGATIONS ON THE GROW: SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS IN THE U.S. CONGREGATIONAL LIFE STUDY

The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market: Online Appendices

Christian-Muslim Relationships in Medan. and Dalihan na tolu. A Social Capital Study. of The Batak Cultural Values

Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Education

Pew Global Attitudes Project 2011 Spring Survey Topline Results July 21, 2011 Release

Perceptions of Spiritual Formation Among Nontraditional Seminary Students

Appendix A: Scaling and regression analysis

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

ABSTRACT. Religion and Economic Growth: An Analysis at the City Level. Ran Duan, M.S.Eco. Mentor: Lourenço S. Paz, Ph.D.

AN EXPLORATORY SURVEY EXAMINING THE FAMILIARITY WITH AND ATTITUDES TOWARD CRYONIC PRESERVATION. W. Scott Badger, Ph.D. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

When Financial Information Meets Religiosity in Philanthropic Giving: The Case of Taiwan

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

Domestic violence and faith communities. The impact of spirituality on women of faith in abusive relationships

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

FACTORS THAT DETERMINE CUSTOMERS ACCEPTANCE OF AR RAHN FINANCING IN SELANGOR. Department of Finance International Islamic University Malaysia 2

Globalization And Religion David Skinner, ( Mount Vernon Nazarene University

Correlates of Youth Group Size and Growth in the Anglican Diocese of Sydney: National Church Life Survey (NCLS) data

AMERICAN SECULARISM CULTUR AL CONTOURS OF NONRELIGIOUS BELIEF SYSTEMS. Joseph O. Baker & Buster G. Smith

DETERMINANTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION ISLAMIC ENDOWMENT (WAQF) ATTRIBUTES AMONG MUSLIMS IN MALAYSIA

Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life 2008 Religious Landscape Survey (RLS) Conversion Recontact Survey October 3 November 7, 2008 Final Topline

Work Ethic, Social Ethic, no Ethic: Measuring the Economic Values of Modern Christians

The Zeal of the Convert: Religious Characteristics of Americans who Switch Religions

NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking

Promoting Islamic financial products to Muslim entrepreneurs: Malaysia corporative bank (bank Rakyat)

Content Area Variations of Academic Language

13 PEW RESEARCH CENTER. Topline Results. Pew Research Center Spring 2014 survey August 27, 2014 Release

P 97 Personality and the Practice of Ministry

Role of Spiritual Values on Spiritual Personality among MBBS Students of AMU

ZALINAWATI ABDULLAH ASSOCIATE PROF. DR. SITI HARYATI SHAIKH ALI

Segment 2 Exam Review #1

University of Warwick institutional repository:

McDougal Littell High School Math Program. correlated to. Oregon Mathematics Grade-Level Standards

I also occasionally write for the Huffington Post: knoll/

End of the year test day 2 #3

Work Hard or Pray Hard? Religion and Attitudes toward Work

EFFECTS OF NEW MEDIA ON RELIGIOUS PRACTICES: A CASE STUDY ON ZAKAT INSTITUTIONS IN MALAYSIA

Nurturing a Heart for the New Evangelization: A National Study of Catholic Elementary School Principals in the U.S.

Accepting Evolution and Believing in God: How Religious Persons Perceive the Theory of Evolution

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

S1 Supporting Information for: Material security, life history, and moralistic religions: A cross-cultural examination. Contents

Divine exchanges: Applying social exchange theory to religious behavior

The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support

PERCEIVED FAIRNESS IN ISLAMIC HOME FINANCING: COMPARISON BETWEEN AL-BAY BITHAMAN AJIL AND MUSHARAKAH MUTANAQISAH PARTNERSHIP CONTRACTS

The Increasing of Zakat Management toward Muzakkis Trust at the Office of Religious Affairs

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

Radiomics for Disease Characterization: An Outcome Prediction in Cancer Patients

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS IN THE 2008 CONGREGATIONAL LIFE STUDY

Socialization and Attitudes: Effects of Religion, Political Identification, and Class,

How many imputations do you need? A two stage calculation using a quadratic rule

Socioeconomic Status and Beliefs about God s Influence in Everyday Life*

Adams, R.G., & Stark, B.J. (1988). Church Conservatism and Services for the Elderly. Journal of Religion and Aging, v.4 no.3/4:

Values, Trends, and the Arab Spring

BIRTH CONTROL: CHRISTIAN ETHICAL PERSPECTIVE

Identity and Sense of Place of Ghajar Residents Living in Border Junction of Syria, Israel and Lebanon

Dimensions of religiosity and attitude towards deviant behaviour

What makes churches grow? What recent Adventist research reveals

T his study aimed to analyze the comparative

Comparing A Two-Factor Theory of Religious Beliefs to A Four-Factor Theory of Isms

The Augmented Misery Index

The Contribution of Quranic Tahfidz to Mental Health

Family Studies Center Methods Workshop

MITOCW watch?v=4hrhg4euimo

Measuring religious intolerance across Indonesian provinces

UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN AFRICA, BARATON

Factors Influencing on Peaceful Co-Existence: Christian s Living in Tehran

Fundamentalism and Democracy: A Volatile Mix?

The Relationship between Religious Attitudes and Concern for the Environment. Aaron Horenstein QMSS G5999, Master s Thesis 5/4/2012

Good Gods Almighty: A report concerning divine attributes from a global sample

The Evolution of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills Over the Life Cycle of the Child

Islamic Banking: More Financial Inclusion for Arab States? Clement M. Henry Middle East Institute National University of Singapore

ZAKAH RECIPIENT PERCEPTION TOWARDS ZAKAT DISTRIBUTION EFFICIECY BASED ON MASLOW S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS

Nigerian University Students Attitudes toward Pentecostalism: Pilot Study Report NPCRC Technical Report #N1102

The Perception of the Muslims in Malaysia on the Belief of Afterlife

Marcello Pagano [JOTTER WEEK 5 SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS ] Central Limit Theorem, Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing

Pastoral Research Online

Religious Research Association, Inc.

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

Faith and Global Policy Challenges. Sample Size: 1,496 (including an oversample of 330 Catholics)

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of the Liberal Arts UNDERSTANDING HOW CONGREGATIONS PROMOTE COMMUNITY

Probability Distributions TEACHER NOTES MATH NSPIRED

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

YOUTH SUICIDE RATES AND MORMON RELIGIOUS CONTEXT: AN ADDITIONAL EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

IJRIM Volume 6, Issue 6 (June, 2016) (ISSN ) International Journal of Research in IT & Management (IMPACT FACTOR 5.96)

Exersices and solutions ANOVA tests for d-primes in sensr

Market Share and Religious Competition: Do Small Market Share Congregations and Their Leaders Try Harder?

Transcription:

Multiple Regression-FORCED-ENTRY HIERARCHICAL MODEL Dennessa Gooden/ Samantha Okegbe COM 6/7 Spring 08 Data: Film & TV Usage 05 IVs Block : Demographics Q: Age Q: Education Q: Income I. MODEL Block : Movie Attraction Qb: Director of film Qc: Stars of Film Qd: Recency of film Block : Repeat Viewing Qa: Often watch a film again and again DV Movie Cheer Up QfREV: [Re going to movies at the theater:] I watch movies when I feel down to cheer me up [Note: We did a reverse code of the Qf responses] Qh: Seen film so often I know much of the dialogue Block : Movie Preference Q8c: Horror Q8f: Comedy Films Q8i: Action Films Q8j: Animated Films

II. RUNNING SPSS ) Analysis Regression Linear

) Select dependent variable: QfREV Click variable name arrow

) Select Independent variable(s) for block Click Independent variable names arrow

5 ) Move to Block by clicking next Note: Make sure your Method says Enter.

6 5) Select Independent Variables for Block Click variable names arrow Note: Screenshots for blocks & are not shown

7 6) Click Statistics Check Estimates, Model fit, R squared change, Descriptives, Part and partial correlations, Collinearity diagnostics. Click Continue

8 7) Click Plots Click *ZRESID to Y and *ZPRED to X Check Histogram and Normal probability plot Click Paste, and then run syntax.

RECODE Qf (=) (=) (=) (=) INTO QfREV. EXECUTE. REGRESSION /DESCRIPTIVES MEAN STDDEV CORR SIG N /MISSING LISTWISE /STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA COLLIN TOL CHANGE ZPP /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.0) /NOORIGIN /DEPENDENT QfREV /METHOD=ENTER Age Education Income /METHOD=ENTER Qb Qc Qd /METHOD=ENTE R Qa Qh /METHOD=ENTER Q8c Q8f Q8i Q8j /SCATTERPLOT=(*ZRESID,*ZPRED ) /RESIDUALS HIST(ZRESID) NORM(ZRESID). 9 Regression Descriptive Statistics QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Mean Std. Deviation N.975.9500 6.68.5 6.6.95 6.7. 6.8.898 6.6.599 6.9.885 6 5.0.85 6.68.0 6.78.98 6..89 6.95.6 6.57.97 6 Page

Correlations 0 Pearson Correlation QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qb. How important The director QfREV Age Education Income of the film..000 -.7 -.5 -.9.8 -.7.000.00.56 -.07 -.5.00.000. -.09 -.9.56..000 -.06.8 -.07 -.09 -.06.000.0.05 -.0 -.0..98 -.056.00.0.07 -.09.06 -.00 -.07.07.0 -.7 -.070 -.00..06 -.5 -.58 -.055.097.07 -.06 -.07.0 -.00 -.067 -.057.00.078.09.06 -.9.0.00.07 Page

Correlations Sig. (-tailed) QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qb. How important The director QfREV Age Education Income of the film...000.00.000.007.000..55.00.8.00.55..000.75.000.00.000..5.007.8.75.5..05.59.08.09.000.000..5.07.000.7.7.8.0.08.7.0.09.95.06..005.00.50.0.088..06.6..0.8.90.068.7.9.000.6.7.0 Page

Correlations N QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qb. How important The director QfREV Age Education Income of the film. 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Page

Correlations Pearson Correlation QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the new the film is. dialogue..0.98 -.09.0.05 -.056.06 -.7 -.0.00 -.00 -.070 -.0.0 -.07 -.00..07.07..000.55.0.5.55.000 -.009 -.05.0 -.009.000.6.5 -.05.6.000.09.07.08.05.6.5.8.95.68.0.056.09.086.0.068.077 Page 5

Correlations Sig. (-tailed) QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the new the film is. dialogue..05.000.7.7.59..7.0.08.5.8.09.09.07.0.95.000.000.08.06..000.000.000.000...58.000...000.000.58.000..0.089.98.0.000.009.000.000.00.0..06.05.67.098.07 Page 6

Correlations 5 N QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the new the film is. dialogue. 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Page 7

Correlations 6 Pearson Correlation QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated.06.07 -.067.06 -.5 -.06 -.057 -.9 -.58 -.07.00.0 -.055.0.078.00.097 -.00.09.07.09.6.68.086.07.5.0.0.08.8.056.068.05.95.09.077.000.9. -.08.9.000.9.7..9.000.0 -.08.7.0.000 Page 8

Correlations 7 Sig. (-tailed) QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated..088.0.9.005..8.000.00.06.90.6.50.6.068.7.0..7.0.0.000.00.05.089.009.0.67.98.000..098.0.000.06.07..00.0..00..000.000.0.000..000..000.000. Page 9

Correlations 8 N QfREV Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Page 0

Variables Entered/Removed b 9 Model Variables Variables Entered Removed Method Income, Age, Education a. Enter Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/ho w new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. a Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and, Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. a Q8i. How often Action, Q8c. How often Horror, Q8j. How often Animated, Q8f. How often Comedy a. Enter. Enter. Enter a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: QfREV Page

Model Summary e 0 Model Adjusted R Std. Error of R R Square Square the Estimate.60 a.067.060.9. b..096.9050.9 c.5.095.907.56 d.7.097.9005 Model Summary e Model Change Statistics R Square Change F Change df df Sig. F Change.067 8.66 59.000.0 5.76 56.00.005.90 5.0.0. 50. a. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education b. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. c. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film., Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and, Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. d. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film., Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and, Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue., Q8i. How often Action, Q8c. How often Horror, Q8j. How often Animated, Q8f. How often Comedy e. Dependent Variable: QfREV ANOVA e Model Regression Residual Total Regression Residual Total Regression Residual Total Regression Residual Total a. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig..055 7.5 8.66.000 a 0.7 59.89 6.777 6 6.7 6 6.09 7.85.000 b 90.606 56.86 6.777 6 7.658 8.707 5.76.000 c 89.9 5.87 6.777 6.5.6.6.000 d 85.5 50.85 6.777 6 b. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. c. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film., Qa. I often Page watch a favorite film again and, Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. d. Predictors: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film., Qa. I often

Coefficients a Model (Constant) Age Education Income (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients B Std. Error Beta t Sig..06..579.000 -.0.00 -.9 -.89.00 -.0.055 -.07 -.985.08 -.055.0 -. -.65.0.596.8 9.89.000 -.0.00 -.7 -.680.008 -..05 -. -.0.06 -.05.0 -. -.78.0.0.08.067.0.7.005.05.008.0.896.09.07.80..00.60.09 8.56.000 -.00.00 -.6 -.0.06 -..05 -.08 -.07.0 -.056.0 -.7 -.56.0.0.08.065.65.5.007.06.0.89.850.09.08.8.9.00 -.05.0 -.087 -.8.8.00.0.06.95. Page

Coefficients a Model (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients B Std. Error Beta t Sig..68.79 6.99.000 -.00.00 -. -.9.05 -..055 -.08 -.0.05 -.05.0 -. -.55.05.06.08.07.69.05.007.07.0.8.856.089.08.76..00 -.05.0 -.0 -.5.7.0.0.066.98.6.00.0.00.057.95.050.0.06.6.57 -.077.0 -.00 -.87.066.0.07.0.6.50 Page

Coefficients a Model (Constant) Age Education Income (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Correlations Zero-order Partial Part Collinearity Statistics Tolerance VIF -.7 -.5 -.7.975.06 -.5 -.0 -.0.900. -.9 -.9 -.6.879.8 -.7 -. -..960.0 -.5 -. -.05.897.5 -.9 -.0 -..876..8.06.060.8..0.007.007.76.58.98.7.67.86.6 -.7 -.7 -.0.90.087 -.5 -.08 -.0.89. -.9 -.5 -.8.870.50.8.06.058.80..0.00.009.68.6.98.75.67.89.9 -.09 -.07 -.067.59.686.0.05.08.566.768 Page 5

Coefficients a Model (Constant) Age Education Income Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated a. Dependent Variable: QfREV Correlations Zero-order Partial Part Collinearity Statistics Tolerance VIF -.7 -.9 -..868.5 -.5 -.07 -.0.87.7 -.9 -.0 -..859.6.8.068.06.790.65.0.00.009.6.556.98.70.6.8.0 -.09 -.08 -.076.579.78.0.05.09.56.779.06.00.00.90.07.07.06.057.8.9 -.067 -.098 -.09.859.65.06.0.0.8.0 Page 6

Excluded Variables d 5 Model Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Beta In t Sig. Partial Correlation.08 a.8.05..0 a.99.07.05.97 a.97.000.0 -.0 a -.80. -.0.007 a.6.89.007.0 a.97.69.0.06 a.5..066 -.066 a -.8.0 -.068.0 a.05.685.0 -.09 b -.956.0 -.05.009 b.7.86.009.00 b.09.985.00.0 b.88.97.05 -.080 b -.57.7 -.08.0 b.8.778.05 -.00 c -.08.969 -.00.055 c.07.0.055 -.08 c -.588. -.08.08 c..7.08 Page 7

Excluded Variables d 6 Model Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Q8c. How often Horror Q8f. How often Comedy Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated Collinearity Statistics Minimum Tolerance VIF Tolerance.99.007.877.99.006.877.995.005.879.997.00.878.980.00.877.957.05.879.99.007.876.988.0.87.96.00.878.9.06.700.898..687.95.058.75.90.098.687.956.06.75.95.05.79.90.06.56.87.6.565.95.08.565.98.055.566 a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Income, Age, Education b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. c. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Income, Age, Education, Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is., Qb. How important The director of the film., Qc. How important The star(s) of the film., Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and, Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. d. Dependent Variable: QfREV Page 8

Collinearity Diagnostics a 7 Model Dimension 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 0 Condition Eigenvalue Index.759.000.8 5..078 6.959.05.90 6.7.000.75.765.89 5.75.9 6.968.07 9.6.066 9.70.0 7.6 7.995.000.77 5.68.5 5.8.7 6.77. 8.079.070 0.680.06.5.06.67.09 0.709.95.000.85 6.5. 6.86. 7.56.79 8.0.55 8.60. 9.65.07.79.06.7.06.706.05.905.0 6..0 9.08 Page 9

Collinearity Diagnostics a 8 Variance Proportions Model Dimension 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 0 Qb. How important The director of the film. Qc. How important The star(s) of the film. (Constant) Age Education Income.00.0.00.0.0..00.88.0.6.8.0.9..7.0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.0.0..0.00.0.00.00.6.00.0..00.60.6.0.0.9...0.0.00.0.0.08.9.8.96.9.55.00.0.0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.0.5..0.00.0.0..0.00.00.0.00.08.50.00.0.8.00..0.0.0.9.8.0.00.08.00.0.0.00.9.8.00.09.00.0.00.0.97..9.00.0.0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.0...0.00.0.0.0.00.00.00.00.00.0..0.00.0.00..7.00.00.0.00.0.0.00.00.7.00.6.0.0.00.0..0.0..00.0.9..0.5.00..5.0.0.09.00.00.08.0..8.00.07.00.0.0..98.5.5.00.0.00 Page 0

Collinearity Diagnostics a 9 Model Dimension 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 0 Qd. How important The recency of the film s release/how new the film is. Variance Proportions Qa. I often watch a favorite film again and Qh. I ve seen some so often that I know much of the dialogue. Q8c. How often Horror.00..68.0.07.0.00.00.00.00.7.00.00..05..5.0.0.0.00.07.0.00.0.8.09.00.0.8.7.0.0.05.00.00.00.00.5.00.00.0..0.07.7.0.0.0.57.7.0.0.05.0.0.07.00.0.00.06.00.0.0.00.0.0.00.0.0.0.0.0.0.0...0.0.7.55.0.0.00.0.07 Page

Collinearity Diagnostics a 0 Variance Proportions Model Dimension 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 0 Q8f. How often Comedy a. Dependent Variable: QfREV Q8i. How often Action Q8j. How often Animated.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0.00.05.00.05.5.00.00.0.0..5..6..5.0.5.7.06.08.6.0.00.06.0.05 Residuals Statistics a Predicted Value Residual Std. Predicted Value Std. Residual a. Dependent Variable: QfREV Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N.080.885.975.798 6 -.5999.565.00000.88796 6 -.67.69.000.000 6 -.77.70.000.98 6 Page

Charts Histogram Dependent Variable: QfREV 0 5 Frequency 0 5 0 5 0 - - 0 Regression Standardized Residual Mean = -.0E-6 Std. Dev. = 0.98 N = 6 Page

Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual.0 Dependent Variable: QfREV 0.8 Expected Cum Prob 0.6 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0.6 0.8.0 Observed Cum Prob Page

Scatterplot Dependent Variable: QfREV Regression Standardized Residual 0 - - - - - 0 Regression Standardized Predicted Value Page 5

IV. Tabling Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Movie Cheer Up PREDICTED VARIABLE r FINAL BETA R CHANGE TOTAL R. Demographics.067***.067*** Age -.7*** -.* Education -.5** -.08* Income -.9*** -.*. Movie Attraction.0**.*** Qb: Director of the film.8**.07 Qc: The stars of the film.0*.0 Qd: The recency of the film.98***.76**. Repeated Viewing.005.5*** Qa: Often watch movie -.09 -.0 again and again Qh: Know much of the dialogue.0.066. Movie Viewing Patterns.0.7*** Q8c: Horror.06.00 Q8f: Comedy.07 a.06 Q8j: Action -.067 -.00 a Q8j: Animated.06.0 R =.7 Adjusted R =.097 F =.6, df =,50, p <.00 Note: a.05 < p <.0 *p <.05; **p <.0; ***p <.00

5 V. The Write Up Write Up of Results In the prediction of going to the movie theater to cheer oneself up when one is down ( Movie Cheer Up ), a four-block hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted. Multicollinearity was not a serious concern, as all tolerances werer.56 and above. The analysis result indicates that predictors explain.7% of the total variance of Movie Cheer Up (F (, 50) =.6, p <.00). First, block, which included the Demographics of Age, Education, and Income, explained 6.7% of the total variance of Movie Cheer Up (F (, 59) = 8.66, p <.00). All demographics were significant unique predictors: Age (final Beta = -., p <.05), Education (final Beta = -.08, p <.05), and Income (final Beta = -., p <.05). As a result, we concluded that demographics do play a significant role in predicting Movie Cheer Up, including when controlling for all of the other independent variables in all four blocks. All these independent variables in block had negative significant unique relationships with Movie Cheer Up. Thus, this means that the older a person is, the more educated and the more their income, the less likely they are to go to a movie theater to watch a film to be cheered up, when all other variables in the full model are controlled for. Second, block, Movie Attraction (with items measuring attraction to film because of the director of the film, the stars of the film, and recency of the film release), explained an additional.% of the total variance of Movie Cheer Up (F (, 56) = 5.76, p =.00). Recency of the film release (final Beta =.76, p <.0) was the only significant unique predictor of Movie Cheer Up.

6 As a person s reliance on the recency of the film increases, Movie Cheer Up increases, when all other predictors in the full regression model are controlled for. The third block, Repeated Viewing, explained only an additional 0.5% of total variance of Movie Cheer Up (F (, 5) =.90, ns). There were no significant unique predictors for block. The fourth block, Movie Viewing Patterns, including frequency of viewing horror movies, comedy, action, and animated movies, explained an additional.% of total variance of Movie Cheer Up (F (, 50) =., ns). How often people view action had a nearly significant unique prediction (final Beta = -.00, a.05 < p <.0) that was negative. As action film viewing increases, Movie Cheer Up decreases, when all other predictors in the full regression model are controlled for. Overall, this analysis included four separate blocks of predictor variables that as a whole did contribute a significant amount of variance to the prediction of Movie Cheer Up, as indicated by the significant R for the total equation. Block (Demographics) and Block (Movie Attraction) both contributed a significant amount of variance to the prediction of Movie Cheer Up as indicated by significant R change figures for each block. Blocks and did not contribute a significant amount of variance to the prediction of Movie Cheer Up. Also, the Beta coefficients indicated that when controlling for the impact of all other variables in the final equation, there are four independent variables that maintained significant unique contributions toward Movie Cheer Up. This is indicated by the four significant final Betas. Greater tendency to go to the movie theater to cheer up when one is down is uniquely predicted by younger age, lower education, lower income, and being attracted to a film because of its recency.