QUESTION 47. The Diversity among Things in General
|
|
- Dorthy Ball
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 QUESTION 47 The Diversity among Things in General After the production of creatures in esse, the next thing to consider is the diversity among them. This discussion will have three parts. First, we will consider the diversity among things in general (question 47); second, the distinction between good and evil (questions 48 and 49); and, third, the distinction between spiritual creatures and corporeal creatures (question 50). On the first topic we will ask about three things: (1) the very multiplicity or diversity of things, (2) the inequality among things, and (3) the oneness of the world. Article 1 Is God the source of the multiplicity and diversity among things? It seems that God is not the source of the multiplicity and distinction among things: Objection 1: One single agent is always apt to effect just one thing. But as is clear from what was said above (q. 11, a. 4), God is maximally one. Therefore, He produces just one effect. Objection 2: An exemplifier is similar to its exemplar. But as was explained above (q. 44, a. 3), God is an exemplar cause of His effect. Therefore, since God is one, His effect is just one and not multiple (distinctus). Objection 3: Things that are ordered to an end are proportioned to that end. But as was shown above (q. 44, a. 4), the end of creatures is one thing, viz., God s goodness. Therefore, God s effect is just one thing. But contrary to this: Genesis 1:4-7 says, God separated the light from the darkness... and He divided the waters... from the waters... Therefore, God is the source of the diversity and multiplicity among things. I respond: Different writers have assigned different causes to the diversity among things. Some have attributed it to matter, either by itself or along with some agent. For instance, Democritus and all the ancient natural philosophers attributed it to matter alone, positing only a material cause in virtue of which the diversity of things happens by chance because of the movement of matter. Anaxagoras, on the other hand, attributed the diversity and multiplicity among things to matter along with an agent. For he posited Mind (Intellectus), which distinguished things by extracting what had been mixed together in the matter. However, there are two reasons why this position cannot be sustained. First, it was shown above (q. 44, a. 2) that even matter itself was created by God. Hence, if there is any diversity on the part of the matter, it must likewise be traced back to a higher cause. Second, matter exists for the sake of form, and not vice versa. But the diversity among things derives from their proper forms. Therefore, it is not the case that diversity occurs among things because of the matter; just the opposite, differentiation was created in the matter in order that it might be accommodated to diverse forms. Again, some have attributed the diversity among things to secondary agents. For instance, Avicenna claimed that in understanding Himself, God produced the first intelligence, in which as will become clear below (q. 50, a. 2) there is necessarily a composition of potentiality and actuality, since it is not its own esse. So, then, insofar as the first intelligence understands the first cause, it produced the second intelligence; on the other hand, insofar as it understands itself with respect to what it has of potentiality, it produced the body of the heavens, which it moves; and insofar as it understands itself with respect to what it has of actuality, it produced the soul of the heavens. However, there are two reasons why this position cannot be sustained. First, it was shown above
2 Part 1, Question (q. 45, a. 5) that it belongs to God alone to create. Hence, things that cannot be caused except through creation are produced by God alone, and these include all the things that are not subject to generation and corruption. Second, according to this position the totality of things comes about not by the first agent s intention, but rather by the coincidence of many agent causes. But this is what we call coming about by chance. Hence, the perfection (complementum) of the universe, which consists in the diversity among things, would exist by chance which is impossible. Instead, one should claim that the diversity and multiplicity among things comes about by the intention of the first agent, who is God. For He brought things into existence in order to communicate His goodness to creatures and to represent His goodness through them. And since His goodness cannot be adequately represented by any one creature, He produced many diverse creatures, so that what was lacking in one s representation of the divine goodness might be supplied by another. For the goodness that exists in a simple and uniform way in God exists in a multiple and divided way among creatures. Hence, the universe as a whole participates in and represents God s goodness in a more perfect way than any other creature does. And it is because the reason for the diversity of things lies in God s wisdom that Moses says that things are divided by God s Word, which is the conception of His wisdom. Thus it is that Genesis 1:3-4 says, God said, Let there be light... and He separated the light from the darkness. Reply to objection 1: That which acts through its nature acts through the form by which it exists, and there is just one form for each thing. That is why such an agent effects just one thing. But as was shown above (q. 19, a. 4), a voluntary agent like God acts through a conceived form. Therefore, since, as was shown above (q. 15, a. 2), the fact that God understands many things is not incompatible with His oneness and simplicity, it follows that even though He is one, He is able to make many things. Reply to objection 2: This objection would hold good in the case of an exemplifier that represents its exemplar perfectly and is multiplied only materially. Hence, there is just a single uncreated Image, which is perfect. But no creature is a perfect representation of the first exemplar, which is God s essence, and so God s essence can be represented through many things. Still, to the extent that ideas are called exemplars, there is a plurality of ideas in God s mind corresponding to the plurality of things. Reply to objection 3: In speculative matters, there is just one middle term of demonstration that perfectly demonstrates the conclusion, though there are many middle terms for probable proofs. Similarly, in practical matters, when the means, as I will put it, measure up fully (adaequat) to the end, then all that is required is a single means. But creatures are not related in this way to the end which is God. Hence, it was necessary for creatures to be multiplied. Article 2 Is God the source of the inequality among things? It seems that God is not the source of the inequality among things: Objection 1: It belongs to the best to bring about the best. But among things that are the best, it is not the case that one is greater than another. Therefore, it belongs to God, who is the best, to make all things equal. Objection 2: As Metaphysics 5 says, equality is an effect of oneness. But God is one. Therefore, He made all things equal. Objection 3: It is part of justice to treat unequals unequally. But God is just in all of His operations. Therefore, since the operation by which He communicates esse to things does not presuppose
3 Part 1, Question any inequality among the things, it seems that He made all things equal. But contrary to this: Ecclesiasticus 33:7-8 says, Why does one day surpass another, and one light another light, and one year another year, and one sun another sun? It is by the Lord s knowledge that they were distinguished. I respond: Wishing to rule out the position of those who claimed that the diversity of things comes from the opposition between a principle of good and a principle of evil, Origen claimed that in the beginning all things were created equal by God. For he asserts that at first God created only rational creatures, all of whom were equal and among whom inequality first arose because of free choice, with some turning toward God to greater and lesser degrees and others turning away from God to greater and lesser degrees. Thus, those rational creatures who had turned toward God through their free choice were promoted to the different orders of angels in proportion to the differences among their merits, whereas those who had turned away from God were tied to different bodies according to the differences among their sins. And Origen claims that this is the reason for the creation of bodies and their diversity. However, according to this view, the totality of corporeal creatures would exist not for the sake of communicating God s goodness to creatures, but in order to punish sin which is contrary to Genesis 1:31 ( God saw all the things that He had made, and they were very good ). Moreover, as Augustine says in De Civitate Dei 11, What claim could be more stupid than that the craftsman God did not choose this sun, as the one sun in the one world, for the embellishment of the world s beauty or for the well-being of corporeal things, but that instead it came to exist because some soul sinned in a given way? On this account, if a hundred souls had sinned in the same way, this world would have had a hundred suns. One should reply instead that just as God s wisdom is the cause of the diversity of things, so too it is the cause of their inequality. This is made clear as follows: There are two kinds of diversity among things (a) formal diversity among things that differ in species and (b) material diversity among things that differ only in number. Now since matter exists for the sake of form, material diversity exists for the sake of formal diversity. For we see that among incorruptible things there is just one individual to a species, since the species is sufficiently conserved in the one individual; by contrast, among generable and corruptible things there are many individuals belonging to the same species, and this for the sake of conserving the species. From this it is clear that formal diversity is more central than material diversity. But formal diversity always requires inequality, since, as Metaphysics 8 says, the forms of things are like numbers, in which the species are differentiated by the addition or subtraction of a unit. Hence, among natural things the species seem to be ordered step by step, so that mixed bodies are more perfect than the elements, and plants are more perfect than minerals, and animals are more perfect than plants, and men are more perfect than the other animals; and within each of these divisions, one species is found to be more perfect than another. Therefore, just as God s wisdom is the cause of the diversity among things for the sake of the perfection of the whole universe, so too it is the cause of the inequality among things. For the universe would not be perfect if just one grade of goodness were found among things. Reply to objection 1: It belongs to the best agent to produce his best overall effect not to make each part of the whole the best absolutely speaking, but rather to make each part the best in its proportion to the whole. By way of example, an animal s goodness would be destroyed if each of its parts had the dignity that belongs to the eyes. So too, then, God made the universe the best it can be as a whole, given its status as a creature. But He did not make each creature the best; instead, He made one better than another. Thus, it is of each creature that Genesis 1:4 says, God saw the light, that it was good, and so on for each individual, but it is of all of them together that Genesis 1:31 says, God saw all the things that He had made, and they were very good. Reply to objection 2: The first thing that comes from oneness is equality, and then comes
4 Part 1, Question multiplicity. And so the Son, to whom equality is appropriated, proceeds from the Father, to whom oneness is appropriated, according to Augustine. And then comes the creature, to which inequality belongs. Still, creatures participate in a certain kind of equality, viz., an equality of proportion. Reply to objection 3: This is the argument that moved Origen, but it has a place only in the giving of rewards, where unequal rewards are owed for unequal merits. By contrast, in the very establishment of things it is not the case that the inequality among the parts derives from a prior inequality of merits or even from a prior inequality in the disposition of the matter; rather, the inequality exists for the sake of the perfection of the whole. This is clear from the works of a craft. For the roof of a house does not differ from the foundation because they are made out of diverse materials. To the contrary, it is in order to make a perfect house from diverse parts that the craftsman looks for diverse materials and he would make those materials himself if he were able to. Article 3 Is there just one world? It seems that there is not just one world, but many worlds: Objection 1: As Augustine says in 83 Quaestiones, it is ridiculous to claim that God created things for no reason. But He could have created many worlds for the same reason that He created one world; for His power is not limited to the creation of just one world, but is instead infinite, as was shown above (q. 25, a. 2). Therefore, God has produced more than one world. Objection 2: Nature does what is better and, a fortiori, God does, too. But it would be better for many worlds to exist rather than just one, since more good things are better than fewer good things. Therefore, more than one world was made by God. Objection 3: Everything that has a form in matter can be numerically multiplied while remaining the same in species, since numerical multiplication is based on matter. But the world has a form in matter. For just as when I say man, I signify a form, whereas when I say this man, I signify a form in matter, so too when I say world, I signify a form, whereas when I say this world, I signify a form in matter. Therefore, nothing prevents there from being more than one world. But contrary to this: John 1:10 says, The world was made by Him, where the world names in the singular, as if only one world exists. I respond: The order that exists among the things created by God is such that it makes manifest the oneness of the world. For this world is called one by a oneness of order, insofar as some things are ordered to others. But as was shown above (q. 11, a. 3 and q. 21, a. 1), all the things that come from God have an ordering both with respect to one another and with respect to God. Hence, it is necessary that all of them belong to a single world. For this reason, those who were able to posit many worlds were the ones who claimed that chance and not any ordering wisdom is the cause of the world, e.g., Democritus, who said that this world and infinitely many others had been made from the convergence of atoms. Reply to objection 1: The reason why the world is one is that all things are duly ordered by a single ordering and to a single end. Thus, in Metaphysics 12 Aristotle infers the oneness of God as governor from the oneness of the ordering that exists among things. And Plato proves the oneness of the world as an exemplifier from the oneness of the exemplar. Reply to objection 2: No agent intends material plurality itself as an end. For material multiplicity has no set terminus and of itself tends toward unlimitedness (de se tendit in infinitum), where
5 Part 1, Question unlimitedness is incompatible with the notion of an end. Now when the objection claims that many worlds are better than just one world, it is talking about material multiplicity. But such multiplicity is not better in the case of God s intention as an agent. For by the same line of reasoning one could assert that if He had made two worlds, it would have been better if there were three worlds, and so on ad infinitum. Reply to objection 3: The world consists of the totality of its matter. For it is not possible for there to be an earth other than this one, since every earth, wherever it might be, would naturally tend toward this central earth. And the same line of reasoning holds for the other bodies that are parts of the world.
QUESTION 65. The Work of Creating Corporeal Creatures
QUESTION 65 The Work of Creating Corporeal Creatures Now that we have considered the spiritual creature, we next have to consider the corporeal creature. In the production of corporeal creatures Scripture
More informationQUESTION 44. The Procession of Creatures from God, and the First Cause of All Beings
QUESTION 44 The Procession of Creatures from God, and the First Cause of All Beings Now that we have considered the divine persons, we will next consider the procession of creatures from God. This treatment
More informationThomas Aquinas on the World s Duration. Summa Theologiae Ia Q46: The Beginning of the Duration of Created Things
Thomas Aquinas on the World s Duration Thomas Aquinas (1224/1226 1274) was a prolific philosopher and theologian. His exposition of Aristotle s philosophy and his views concerning matters central to the
More informationQUESTION 54. An Angel s Cognition
QUESTION 54 An Angel s Cognition Now that we have considered what pertains to an angel s substance, we must proceed to his cognition. This consideration will have four parts: we must consider, first, an
More informationQUESTION 22. God s Providence
QUESTION 22 God s Providence Now that we have considered what pertains to God s will absolutely speaking, we must proceed to those things that are related to both His intellect and will together. These
More informationQUESTION 3. God s Simplicity
QUESTION 3 God s Simplicity Once we have ascertained that a given thing exists, we then have to inquire into its mode of being in order to come to know its real definition (quid est). However, in the case
More informationQUESTION 42. The Equality and Likeness of the Divine Persons in Comparison to One Another
QUESTION 42 The Equality and Likeness of the Divine Persons in Comparison to One Another Next we must consider the persons in comparison to one another: first, with respect to their equality and likeness
More informationQUESTION 45. The Mode of the Emanation of Things from the First Principle
QUESTION 45 The Mode of the Emanation of Things from the First Principle Next we ask about the mode of the emanation of things from the first principle; this mode is called creation. On this topic there
More informationQUESTION 19. God s Will
QUESTION 19 God s Will Having considered the things that pertain to God s knowledge, we must now consider the things that pertain to God s will. First, we will consider God s will itself (question 19);
More informationQUESTION 59. An Angel s Will
QUESTION 59 An Angel s Will We next have to consider what pertains to an angel s will. We will first consider the will itself (question 59) and then the movement of the will, which is love (amor) or affection
More informationQUESTION 56. An Angel s Cognition of Immaterial Things
QUESTION 56 An Angel s Cognition of Immaterial Things The next thing to ask about is the cognition of angels as regards the things that they have cognition of. We ask, first, about their cognition of immaterial
More informationThe Names of God. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006)
The Names of God from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 12-13) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) For with respect to God, it is more apparent to us what God is not, rather
More informationQUESTION 90. The Initial Production of Man with respect to His Soul
QUESTION 90 The Initial Production of Man with respect to His Soul After what has gone before, we have to consider the initial production of man. And on this topic there are four things to consider: first,
More informationQUESTION 55. The Medium of Angelic Cognition
QUESTION 55 The Medium of Angelic Cognition The next thing to ask about is the medium of angelic cognition. On this topic there are three questions: (1) Do angels have cognition of all things through their
More informationQUESTION 28. The Divine Relations
QUESTION 28 The Divine Relations Now we have to consider the divine relations. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Are there any real relations in God? (2) Are these relations the divine essence
More informationQUESTION 113. The Guardianship of the Good Angels
QUESTION 113 The Guardianship of the Good Angels Next we have to consider the guardianship of the good angels (question 113) and the attacks of the bad angels (question 114). On the first topic there are
More informationQUESTION 34. The Person of the Son: The Name Word
QUESTION 34 The Person of the Son: The Name Word Next we have to consider the person of the Son. Three names are attributed to the Son, viz., Son, Word, and Image. But the concept Son is taken from the
More informationQUESTION 58. The Mode of an Angel s Cognition
QUESTION 58 The Mode of an Angel s Cognition The next thing to consider is the mode of an angel s cognition. On this topic there are seven questions: (1) Is an angel sometimes thinking in potentiality
More informationQuestions on Book III of the De anima 1
Siger of Brabant Questions on Book III of the De anima 1 Regarding the part of the soul by which it has cognition and wisdom, etc. [De an. III, 429a10] And 2 with respect to this third book there are four
More informationThomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature
Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature Summa Theologiae I 1 13 Translated, with Commentary, by Brian Shanley Introduction by Robert Pasnau Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge
More informationDuns Scotus on Divine Illumination
MP_C13.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 110 13 Duns Scotus on Divine Illumination [Article IV. Concerning Henry s Conclusion] In the fourth article I argue against the conclusion of [Henry s] view as follows:
More informationHenry of Ghent on Divine Illumination
MP_C12.qxd 11/23/06 2:29 AM Page 103 12 Henry of Ghent on Divine Illumination [II.] Reply [A. Knowledge in a broad sense] Consider all the objects of cognition, standing in an ordered relation to each
More informationThe Five Ways of St. Thomas in proving the existence of
The Language of Analogy in the Five Ways of St. Thomas Aquinas Moses Aaron T. Angeles, Ph.D. San Beda College The Five Ways of St. Thomas in proving the existence of God is, needless to say, a most important
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson December, 2012
1 This translation of Book One Distinctions 1 and 2 of the Ordinatio (aka Opus Oxoniense) of Blessed John Duns Scotus is complete. These two first distinctions take up the whole of volume two of the Vatican
More informationOn Being and Essence (DE ENTE Et ESSENTIA)
1 On Being and Essence (DE ENTE Et ESSENTIA) By Saint Thomas Aquinas 2 DE ENTE ET ESSENTIA [[1]] Translation 1997 by Robert T. Miller[[2]] Prologue A small error at the outset can lead to great errors
More informationThomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae la Translated, with Introduction and Commentary, by. Robert Pasnau
Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on Hulllan Nature Summa Theologiae la 75-89 Translated, with Introduction and Commentary, by Robert Pasnau Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge Question 77.
More informationThe Divine Nature. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J.
The Divine Nature from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 3-11) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian J. Shanley (2006) Question 3. Divine Simplicity Once it is grasped that something exists,
More informationThe question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now
Sophia Project Philosophy Archives What is Truth? Thomas Aquinas The question is concerning truth and it is inquired first what truth is. Now it seems that truth is absolutely the same as the thing which
More informationQUESTION 10. The Modality with Which the Will is Moved
QUESTION 10 The Modality with Which the Will is Moved Next, we have to consider the modality with which (de modo quo) the will is moved. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Is the will moved naturally
More informationVol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII
Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS Book VII Lesson 1. The Primacy of Substance. Its Priority to Accidents Lesson 2. Substance as Form, as Matter, and as Body.
More informationQUESTION 53. The Corruption and Diminution of Habits. Article 1. Can a habit be corrupted?
QUESTION 53 The Corruption and Diminution of Habits Next we have to consider the corruption and diminution of habits (de corruptione et diminutione habituum). And on this topic there are three questions:
More informationQUESTION 83. The Subject of Original Sin
QUESTION 83 The Subject of Original Sin Next we have to consider the subject of original sin. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Is the subject of original sin the flesh or the soul in the first
More informationTHE ORDINATIO OF BLESSED JOHN DUNS SCOTUS. Book Two. First Distinction (page 16)
1 THE ORDINATIO OF BLESSED JOHN DUNS SCOTUS Book Two First Distinction (page 16) Question 1: Whether Primary Causality with Respect to all Causables is of Necessity in the Three Persons Num. 1 I. Opinion
More informationQUESTION 97. The Conservation of the Individual in the First State
QUESTION 97 The Conservation of the Individual in the First State The next thing we have to consider is what pertains to the state of the first man with respect to the body: first, as regards the conservation
More informationThe Five Ways. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Question 2) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) Question 2. Does God Exist?
The Five Ways from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Question 2) by Thomas Aquinas (~1265 AD) translated by Brian Shanley (2006) Question 2. Does God Exist? Article 1. Is the existence of God self-evident? It
More informationc Peter King, 1987; all rights reserved. WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 6
WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 6 Thirdly, I ask whether something that is universal and univocal is really outside the soul, distinct from the individual in virtue of the nature of the thing, although
More informationFirst Treatise <Chapter 1. On the Eternity of Things>
First Treatise 5 10 15 {198} We should first inquire about the eternity of things, and first, in part, under this form: Can our intellect say, as a conclusion known
More informationWHAT ARISTOTLE TAUGHT
WHAT ARISTOTLE TAUGHT Aristotle was, perhaps, the greatest original thinker who ever lived. Historian H J A Sire has put the issue well: All other thinkers have begun with a theory and sought to fit reality
More informationScience. January 27, 2016
Science January 27, 2016 1 2 Anaxagoras For our purposes, Anaxagoras is interesting as a follower of Parmenides and Zeno. Many of the fragments from Anaxagoras appear to be paraphrases of Parmenides. E.g.:
More informationQUESTION 59. The Relation of the Moral Virtues to the Passions
QUESTION 59 The Relation of the Moral Virtues to the Passions Next we have to consider the distinction of the moral virtues from one another. And since those moral virtues that have to do with the passions
More informationQUESTION 87. How Our Intellect Has Cognition of Itself and of What Exists Within It
QUESTION 87 How Our Intellect Has Cognition of Itself and of What Exists Within It Next we have to consider how the intellective soul has cognition of itself and of what exists within it. And on this topic
More informationThe Unmoved Mover (Metaphysics )
The Unmoved Mover (Metaphysics 12.1-6) Aristotle Part 1 The subject of our inquiry is substance; for the principles and the causes we are seeking are those of substances. For if the universe is of the
More informationWilliam Ockham on Universals
MP_C07.qxd 11/17/06 5:28 PM Page 71 7 William Ockham on Universals Ockham s First Theory: A Universal is a Fictum One can plausibly say that a universal is not a real thing inherent in a subject [habens
More informationFrancisco Suárez, S. J. DE SCIENTIA DEI FUTURORUM CONTINGENTIUM 1.8 1
Francisco Suárez, S. J. DE SCIENTIA DEI FUTURORUM CONTINGENTIUM 1.8 1 Sydney Penner 2015 2 CHAPTER 8. Last revision: October 29, 2015 In what way, finally, God cognizes future contingents.
More informationQUESTION 86. What Our Intellect Has Cognition of in Material Things
QUESTION 86 What Our Intellect Has Cognition of in Material Things Next we have to consider what our intellect understands in material things. And on this topic there are four questions: (1) Does our intellect
More informationQUESTION 64. The Punishment of the Demons
QUESTION 64 The Punishment of the Demons Next we inquire into the punishment of the demons. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Is a demon s intellect darkened? (2) Is a demon s will obstinate?
More informationNICHOLAS OF CUSA: METAPHYSICAL SPECULATIONS. Six Latin Texts Translated into English by JASPER HOPKINS THE ARTHUR J. BANNING PRESS MINNEAPOLIS
NICHOLAS OF CUSA: METAPHYSICAL SPECULATIONS Six Latin Texts Translated into English by JASPER HOPKINS THE ARTHUR J. BANNING PRESS MINNEAPOLIS The translation of De Aequalitate was made from Hopkins s collation
More informationQUESTION 67. The Duration of the Virtues after this Life
QUESTION 67 The Duration of the Virtues after this Life Next we have to consider the duration of the virtues after this life (de duratione virtutum post hanc vitam). On this topic there are six questions:
More informationQUESTION 94. The Natural Law
QUESTION 94 The Natural Law We next have to consider the natural law. And on this topic there are six questions: (1) What is the natural law? (2) Which precepts belong to the natural law? (3) Are all the
More information1 Concerning distinction 39 I ask first whether God immutably foreknows future
Reportatio IA, distinctions 39 40, questions 1 3 QUESTION 1: DOES GOD IMMUTABLY FOREKNOW FUTURE CONTINGENT EVENTS? 1 Concerning distinction 39 I ask first whether God immutably foreknows future contingent
More informationQUESTION 66. The Order of Creation with respect to Division
QUESTION 66 The Order of Creation with respect to Division The next thing to consider is the work of division (opus distinctionis). We have to consider, first, the order of creation with respect to division
More informationQUESTION 30. Mercy. Article 1. Is something bad properly speaking the motive for mercy?
QUESTION 30 Mercy We next have to consider mercy or pity (misericordia). And on this topic there are four questions: (1) Is the cause of mercy or pity something bad that belongs to the one on whom we have
More informationSt. Thomas Aquinas Excerpt from Summa Theologica
St. Thomas Aquinas Excerpt from Summa Theologica Part 1, Question 2, Articles 1-3 The Existence of God Because the chief aim of sacred doctrine is to teach the knowledge of God, not only as He is in Himself,
More informationQUESTION 34. The Goodness and Badness of Pleasures
QUESTION 34 The Goodness and Badness of Pleasures Next we have to consider the goodness and badness of pleasures. And on this topic there are four questions: (1) Is every pleasure bad? (2) Given that not
More informationThe Nature and Extent of Sacred Doctrine Thomas Aquinas
The Nature and Extent of Sacred Doctrine Thomas Aquinas Art 1: Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required? Objection 1: It seems that, besides philosophical science, we have no need
More informationQUESTION 20. The Goodness and Badness of the Exterior Act
QUESTION 20 The Goodness and Badness of the Exterior Act Next we have to consider goodness and badness with respect to exterior acts. And on this topic there are six questions: (1) Do goodness and badness
More informationThomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature
Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on the Divine Nature Summa Theologiae I 1 13 Translated, with Commentary, by Brian Shanley Introduction by Robert Pasnau Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge
More informationQUESTION 116. Fate. Article 1. Is there such a thing as fate?
QUESTION 116 Fate Next we have to consider fate, which is attributed to certain bodies (question 116). On this topic there are four questions: (1) Is there such a thing as fate? (2) What does it exist
More informationPHYSICS by Aristotle
PHYSICS by Aristotle Book 3 1 NATURE has been defined as a principle of motion and change, and it is the subject of our inquiry. We must therefore see that we understand the meaning of motion ; for if
More informationAlexander of Hales, The Sum of Theology 1 (translated by Oleg Bychkov) Introduction, Question One On the discipline of theology
Alexander of Hales, The Sum of Theology 1 (translated by Oleg Bychkov) Introduction, Question One On the discipline of theology Chapter 1. Is the discipline of theology an [exact] science? Therefore, one
More informationQUESTION 55. The Essence of a Virtue
QUESTION 55 The Essence of a Virtue Next we have to consider habits in a specific way (in speciali). And since, as has been explained (q. 54, a. 3), habits are distinguished by good and bad, we will first
More information270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n.
Ordinatio prologue, q. 5, nn. 270 313 A. The views of others 270 Now that we have settled these issues, we should answer the first question [n. 217]. There are five ways to answer in the negative. [The
More informationQUESTION 27. The Principal Act of Charity, i.e., the Act of Loving
QUESTION 27 The Principal Act of Charity, i.e., the Act of Loving We next have to consider the act of charity and, first of all, the principal act of charity, which is the act of loving (dilectio) (question
More information1/10. Descartes and Spinoza on the Laws of Nature
1/10 Descartes and Spinoza on the Laws of Nature Last time we set out the grounds for understanding the general approach to bodies that Descartes provides in the second part of the Principles of Philosophy
More informationQUESTION 45. Daring. Article 1. Is daring contrary to fear?
QUESTION 45 Daring Next we have to consider daring or audacity (audacia). And on this topic there are four questions: (1) Is daring contrary to fear? (2) How is daring related to hope? (3) What are the
More informationexists and the sense in which it does not exist.
68 Aristotle exists and the sense in which it does not exist. 217b29-218a3 218a4-218a8 218a9-218a10 218a11-218a21 218a22-218a29 218a30-218a30 218a31-218a32 10 Next for discussion after the subjects mentioned
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF NATURE LET THOMAS AQUINAS TEACH IT. Joseph Kenny, O.P. St. Thomas Aquinas Priory Ibadan, Nigeria
PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE LET THOMAS AQUINAS TEACH IT by Joseph Kenny, O.P. St. Thomas Aquinas Priory Ibadan, Nigeria 2012 PREFACE Philosophy of nature is in a way the most important course in Philosophy. Metaphysics
More informationQUESTION 107. The Speech of Angels
QUESTION 107 The Speech of Angels The next thing we have to consider is the speech of angels. On this topic, there are five questions: (1) Does one angel speak to another? (2) Does a lower angel speak
More informationThomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae la Translated, with Introduction and Commentary, by. Robert Pasnau
Thomas Aquinas The Treatise on Hulllan Nature Summa Theologiae la 75-89 Translated, with Introduction and Commentary, by Robert Pasnau Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge 2002 2 Question
More informationGod, Natural Evil and the Best Possible World
God, Natural Evil and the Best Possible World Peter Vardy The debate about whether or not this is the Best Possible World (BPW) is usually centred on the question of evil - in other words how can this
More informationQUESTION 92. The Production of the Woman
QUESTION 92 The Production of the Woman The next thing we have to consider is the production of the woman. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Was it fitting for the woman to be produced in this
More informationQUESTION 96. The Force of Human Law
QUESTION 96 The Force of Human Law We next have to consider the force (potestas) of human law. On this topic there are six questions: (1) Should human law be formulated in a general way? (2) Should human
More informationMan and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard
Man and the Presence of Evil in Christian and Platonic Doctrine by Philip Sherrard Source: Studies in Comparative Religion, Vol. 2, No.1. World Wisdom, Inc. www.studiesincomparativereligion.com OF the
More informationQUESTION 63. The Cause of Virtue
QUESTION 63 The Cause of Virtue Next we have to consider the cause of virtue. And on this topic there are four questions: (1) Does virtue exist in us by nature? (2) Is any virtue caused in us by the habituation
More informationON UNIVERSALS (SELECTION)
ON UNIVERSALS (SELECTION) Peter Abelard Peter Abelard (c.1079-c.1142) was born into an aristocratic military family, and while he took up the pen rather than the sword, use of the pen was just as combative
More informationEUTHYPHRO, GOD S NATURE, AND THE QUESTION OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES. An Analysis of the Very Complicated Doctrine of Divine Simplicity.
IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 4, Number 20, May 20 to May 26, 2002 EUTHYPHRO, GOD S NATURE, AND THE QUESTION OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES An Analysis of the Very Complicated Doctrine of Divine Simplicity by Jules
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson December, 2012
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio (aka Opus Oxoniense) of Blessed John Duns Scotus is complete. It is based on volume one of the critical edition of the text by the Scotus Commission
More informationChapter Six. Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality
Chapter Six Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality Key Words: Form and matter, potentiality and actuality, teleological, change, evolution. Formal cause, material cause,
More informationOn The Existence of God Thomas Aquinas
On The Existence of God Thomas Aquinas Art 1: Whether the Existence of God is Self-Evident? Objection 1. It seems that the existence of God is self-evident. Now those things are said to be self-evident
More informationQUESTION 69. The Beatitudes
QUESTION 69 The Beatitudes We next have to consider the beatitudes. On this topic there are four questions: (1) Do the beatitudes differ from the gifts and the virtues? (2) Do the rewards attributed to
More informationThomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica. Translated by The Fathers of the English Dominican Province [Benziger Bros. edition, 1947].
ThomasAquinas,SummaTheologica.TranslatedbyTheFathersoftheEnglishDominican Province[BenzigerBros.edition,1947]. THENATUREANDEXTENTOFSACREDDOCTRINE(TENARTICLES) Toplaceourpurposewithinproperlimits,wefirstendeavortoinvestigatethenatureand
More informationGenus and Differentia: Reconciling Unity in Definition
Genus and Differentia: Reconciling Unity in Definition Brian Vogler Senior Seminar Profs. Kosman & Wright April 26, 2004 Vogler 1 INTRODUCTION In I.8 of the Metaphysics, Aristotle makes the perplexing
More informationJohn Buridan on Essence and Existence
MP_C31.qxd 11/23/06 2:37 AM Page 250 31 John Buridan on Essence and Existence In the eighth question we ask whether essence and existence are the same in every thing. And in this question by essence I
More informationDisputation 20. On the First Efficient Cause and on His First Action, Which Is Creation
Chapter 3 done 4/23/01 5:54 PM Page 1 Disputation 20 On the First Efficient Cause and on His First Action, Which Is Creation In metaphysics the consideration of God the most glorious is twofold: namely,
More informationOn Truth Thomas Aquinas
On Truth Thomas Aquinas Art 1: Whether truth resides only in the intellect? Objection 1. It seems that truth does not reside only in the intellect, but rather in things. For Augustine (Soliloq. ii, 5)
More informationQUESTION 84. How the Conjoined Soul Understands Corporeal Things That are Below Itself
QUESTION 84 How the Conjoined Soul Understands Corporeal Things That are Below Itself Next we have to consider the acts of the soul with respect to the intellective and appetitive powers, since the other
More informationQUESTION 8. The Objects of the Will
QUESTION 8 The Objects of the Will Next, we have to consider voluntary acts themselves in particular. First, we have to consider the acts that belong immediately to the will in the sense that they are
More informationSpinoza on God, Affects, and the Nature of Sorrow
Florida Philosophical Review Volume XVII, Issue 1, Winter 2017 59 Spinoza on God, Affects, and the Nature of Sorrow Rocco A. Astore, The New School for Social Research I. Introduction Throughout the history
More informationQUESTION 24. The Subject of Charity
QUESTION 24 The Subject of Charity We next have to consider charity in relation to its subject. On this topic there are twelve questions: (1) Is charity in the will as in a subject? (2) Is charity caused
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
More informationQUESTION 76. The Union of the Soul with the Body
QUESTION 76 The Union of the Soul with the Body Next we must consider the union of the soul with the body. On this topic there are eight questions: (1) Is the intellective principle united to the body
More informationAQUINAS S FOURTH WAY: FROM GRADATIONS OF BEING
AQUINAS S FOURTH WAY: FROM GRADATIONS OF BEING I. THE DATUM: GRADATIONS OF BEING AQUINAS: The fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things. Among beings there are some more and some less
More informationAquinas, Hylomorphism and the Human Soul
Aquinas, Hylomorphism and the Human Soul Aquinas asks, What is a human being? A body? A soul? A composite of the two? 1. You Are Not Merely A Body: Like Avicenna, Aquinas argues that you are not merely
More informationOn the Soul. from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 75-76) by Thomas Aquinas (~1274 AD) translated by Robert Pasnau (2014)
On the Soul from Summa Theologiae (Part I, Questions 75-76) by Thomas Aquinas (~1274 AD) translated by Robert Pasnau (2014) Question 75. On Soul Considered in Its Own Right It seems that the soul is a
More informationAQUINAS: EXPOSITION OF BOETHIUS S HEBDOMADS * Introduction
AQUINAS: EXPOSITION OF BOETHIUS S HEBDOMADS * Introduction Get thee home without delay; foregather there and play there, and muse upon thy conceptions. (Sirach 32:15 16) [1] The zeal for wisdom has the
More informationc Peter King, 1987; all rights reserved. WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 8
WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: ORDINATIO 1 d. 2 q. 8 Fifthly, I ask whether what is universal [and] univocal is something real existing subjectively somewhere. [ The Principal Arguments ] That it is: The universal
More informationReading Questions for Phil , Fall 2013 (Daniel)
1 Reading Questions for Phil 412.200, Fall 2013 (Daniel) Class Two: Descartes Meditations I & II (Aug. 28) For Descartes, why can t knowledge gained through sense experience be trusted as the basis of
More informationQUESTION 66. The Equality of the Virtues
QUESTION 66 The Equality of the Virtues Next we have to consider the equality of the virtues (de aequalitate virtutum). On this topic there are six questions: (1) Can a virtue be greater or lesser? (2)
More informationIbn Sina on Substances and Accidents
Ibn Sina on Substances and Accidents ERWIN TEGTMEIER, MANNHEIM There was a vivid and influential dialogue of Western philosophy with Ibn Sina in the Middle Ages; but there can be also a fruitful dialogue
More informationQUESTION 44. The Precepts that Pertain to Charity
QUESTION 44 The Precepts that Pertain to Charity Next we have to consider the precepts or commandments that pertain to charity (praecepta caritatis). And on this topic there are eight questions: (1) Should
More information