Apologetic Method. Jacob D. Hantla

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Apologetic Method. Jacob D. Hantla"

Transcription

1 Apologetic Method Jacob D. Hantla Reformed Theological Seminary, Virtual Campus Christian Apologetics Professor, Dr. John M. Frame June 2008

2 Apologetic Method 2 Table of Contents The Apologist... 3 Apologetic Method... 4 Apologetics as Evangelism... 5 Apologetics and Circularity... 6 Apologetics and Evidence... 9 Apologetics and the Individual Bibliography... 12

3 Apologetic Method 3 Most of the discussions relating to the methods of apologetics are centered around how to do apologetics. However, the most important issues surrounding the methods of apologetics are the character of the apologist and the presuppositions of the apologetic. Christian apologetics must do more than convince one of the plausibility or probability of theism; apologetics must point apologist and skeptic alike to a true knowledge of the God of the Bible and the worldview that flows from that knowledge. In 1 Peter 3:15, the standard proof-text passage validating the existence of apologetics, the apostle commands the believers facing persecution to in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense (ἀπολογίαν, apologion) to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you (ESV). Christian apologetics is generally defined as the theological discipline devoted to the apologia making a defense or giving an answer of the Christian worldview. Before considering how this apologetic is made, we must consider the apologist himself. The Apologist Whenever a non-christian and a Christian interact, there are two totally distinct sets of basic heart-commitments coming into contact 1. The heart of the Christian the center of his affections honors Christ as holy and is committed to living an obedient life to the glory of God (1 Peter 3:10-12; Romans 6:16). The heart of the non-christian, by contrast, does not honor Christ as Lord or as holy (1 Corinthians 12:3; Ephesians 2:1-3; Romans 1:21, 29-31) but is committed to only evil (Romans 3:10-18). In 1 Peter 3, the apostle s concern when these 1 Van Til (1976, Chapter 4) calls the interaction a head-on collision of worldviews.

4 Apologetic Method 4 worldviews collide in an apologetic encounter is the way in which the Christian behaves in that interaction. Likewise, Paul s concern for the Lord s servant is his demeanor while making an argument for the faith. Not only does the apologist proclaim truths about God with his mouth, but he also makes a loud and clear statement about the nature of the God he is representing through his conduct. Just as the Christian and non-christian worldviews are in opposition to each other, so too the character of the Christian and non-christian will be divergent. It is expected that the non- Christian will behaviorally manifest his opposition to God. In contrast, demonstrating his submission to the Lord and love for his opponent, the apologist must be gentle and respectful (1 Peter 3:15), not quarrelsome, kind to everybody, able to teach, and patient in endurance of evil (2 Timothy 2:23-24). Whitcomb writes (1977, 292), It is clear from [the 1 Peter 3] passage, then, that no spiritually effective answers can be given to unregenerate people by Christians concerning the hope that is in them until they have learned to sanctify Christ as Lord in their own hearts. Apologetic Method God must be glorified in the manner in which the truth is presented, and God must be glorified by the truth that is presented in the apologetic encounter. As has already been said, the apologetic encounter is a clash of worldviews: The Christian submits everything including his rational mind to God; the non-christian, while in a sense knowing God (Romans 1:21), refuses to even acknowledge God (Romans 1:18, 28) and rather views his own wisdom and not God as the standard (Romans 1:22; 1 Corinthians 1:18-22). These effects of sin effects on the unregenerate s entirety, including intellect (noetic effects) must be acknowledged. As Frame

5 Apologetic Method 5 writes (Cowan, 2000, 211), Those who deny God do so, not because they lack evidence, but because their hearts are rebellious. Ultimately the job of the apologist is to do that which the apologist cannot do, change the fundamental way that a person relates to God. The apologist is to argue in a way that the Spirit would use to change one who has a knowledge of God that refuses to honor him as God (Romans 1:21; 2 Timothy 2:25-26) into one who honors God as holy (1 Peter 3:15; Romans 6:16). Apologetics as Evangelism We see then that the task of the apologist is simply a subset of the task of the evangelist. In response to demands in Corinth for evidence and engagement with Greek philosophical wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:22), Paul instead gives them the wisdom of God, the word of God, namely the gospel of Christ crucified (1 Corinthians 1:23, 2:1-7), a wisdom which the world will not understand apart from the Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:14). It is a wisdom that those who God is saving 2 will recognize for what it is, the wisdom and power of God (1 Corinthians 1:18, 30). This does not mean that the apologist abandons wisdom or argument, but rather preaches a wisdom not dictated by the standards of man, but rather by God. For His glory, God will not be found by the wisdom of the world (1 Corinthians 1:21-31). So while the apologist may receive demands for evidence according to the standards of human wisdom, he must be certain that every word of his apologetic response is presented in submission to God s Word toward the end of his hearers salvation. 2 The regenerate with the noetic effects of sin reversed by the noetic effects of salvation, the very imparting of the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16).

6 Apologetic Method 6 Every apologetic encounter and presentation of evidence must be seen as an opportunity to preach that which God will use to change the hearers hearts: Christ crucified the message of God s substitionary, reconciling death on the sinner s behalf (1 Corinthians 2:2; 2 Corinthians 5:18-21) 3. The sinner who thinks that he is sitting in judgment over God must be brought into proper relationship to God; he must realize that knowledge obtained apart from submission to God is distorted knowledge. The problem is epistemological, and the non-believer must begin thinking apart from his own autonomy. All true thought is subject to God s Word as the final normative standard (Frame, 1994, 51). Therefore, Frame defines apologetics as the application of Scripture to unbelief (1987, 87). A presuppositional apologetic an apologetic that recognizes that conformity to Scripture is the very criterion of truth is the necessary conclusion of a biblical understanding of the noetic effects of sin and regeneration. Apologetics and Circularity If the Christian apologist is to argue for the truth of God by presupposing the truth of God s Word, is this not circular reasoning, as the conclusion is assumed by the argument itself? Some apologists like William Lane Craig say that the futility of circular arguing for God by using Christian presuppositions precludes its use in apologetics. Rather, as Craig argues, we must start from common ground and build a case for Christianity. He claims that this common ground is the laws of logic and the facts of our experience (2008, 51-57). 3 Note also, in 1 Corinthians 1:18-2:16, that the manner in which Paul apologetically presented Christ crucified (not with lofty speech or wisdom, but in weakness, fear, and trembling so that faith would rest in the power of God) is an important compliment to the content of the message. Both the manner and the content are necessary, both are contrary to those of the worldly skeptic, and both are designed to humble man and exalt God.

7 Apologetic Method 7 How is one to argue that laws of logic (rationalism) and sense experience (empiricism) are valid standards by which to measure truth? In its final analysis an argument for rationality reduces to rational autonomy being accepted as the ultimate standard; the same goes for the argument for empiricism. The Christian recognizes the truth that God is the quintessential reference point, or standard, for truth. The non-christian maintains that God is not the measure of truth, usually substituting the autonomous self in His place. Therefore, again we see that there is no true common ground but rather two mutually exclusive systems that must argue circularly for their ultimate criterion 4. Even the Christian s circularity 5 relating to the ultimate standard can be used as an apologetic tool. As we have seen, unbelief in God does not find its root in lack of evidence, but in sinfully refusing to submit to God. If the goal of apologetics is faith in the gospel, then recognition (through revealing a presupposition) that the non-believer has been entirely in rebellion to God may be a step the Spirit will use to convict of sin. The apologist is not simply trying to add some Christian values or data to the skeptic s worldview; worldview must change, and that happens by repentance and faith in the gospel. Furthermore, with the universal existence of ultimate presuppositions in view, the apologist can demonstrate the inability for anything other than the God of the Bible to function as this norm. The rationalism of Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz is irrationalism, as it bases itself on the 4 Frame argues (1987, 130), Circularity in a system is properly justified only at one point: in an argument for the ultimate criterion of the system (emphasis his). And again (2002, 407), There is always a kind of circularity when we are dealing with an ultimate standard. If one s standard of truth is human reason, one can argue for that standard only by rational argument, an argument that presupposes the truth of its conclusion. The critic will be just as guilty of circularity as the Christian is (Frame, 1987, 130). 5 Despite the validity of circularity relating to the ultimate criterion, Frame s advice (1987, ) to avoid narrowly circular arguments, broadening the argument with data submitted to the standard of God s Word, thus making it more persuasive and not viciously circular.

8 Apologetic Method 8 autonomous thinker and is disconnected from reality. The Humean, empirical understanding of reality that modern science 6 espouses also reduces to irrationalism as it is incapable of describing any necessary or universal truths. The rationalist must be shown the insufficiency of accepting himself as ultimate and instead be directed to the one that makes all logical thinking and argument possible (Frame, 2000, 220), a logical, creator God. The empiricist must be shown that, based on empiricism alone, no universal truths or values can be discerned. Not a single fact can be known unless it be God that gives that fact meaning (Van Til, 1997, chapter 11). The apologist does not then leave the skeptic in irrational despair, nor does he allow him with Kant to say that we must limit our use of reason (rationalism) to the world of experience (phenomenal) and not the noumenal world of things as they really are in themselves. Rather, the apologist should expose this rational-irrational dialectic that is present in all unbelieving thought. He should use that dialectic to point the unbeliever to what is obvious to him but suppressed (Romans 1:18-21) and is necessary for all thinking and knowing something outside of himself namely the creator God of the Bible (Frame, 1987, 59-61, ; Frame, 1994, 69-71). When any ultimate standard (morality, laws of logic, validity of sense-experience, etc.) appealed to by the skeptic is valid leads to knowledge of truth, the apologist can expose that the unbeliever is thinking inconsistently with that inadequate standard and actually thinking as if God were the standard. 7 The unbeliever s problem should be demonstrated not merely to be that he has adopted the wrong ultimate standard, but that his embrace of an inadequate and 6 Philip Johnson in Darwin on Trial does an excellent job of exposing the irrationalism and inconsistency in science, particularly as relates to Darwinian evolution and natural selection. Johnson dismantles handily the claim that science has proven Darwinism, and therefore it is true, and that creationism is therefore resoundingly disproven. Johnson reveals that science is not as objective as its adherents would like to think. His arguments can be useful in exposing the insufficiency and inconsistency of using science as an ultimate standard. 7 Van Til argues that this is the best argument for Christian theism, to show the unbeliever that Even non- Christians presuppose its truth while they verbally reject it. (2003, 134)

9 Apologetic Method 9 inconsistent normative standard is caused by and evidences his rebellion toward God. The unbeliever is wrong because he does not know how he ought 8 to know. Apologetics and Evidence Therefore, the apologist is able to make use of all types of evidence and argument provided that it is valid according to the criteria of Scripture and done in submission to God as Lord. For example, the Paley s classic teleological argument can certainly be used to show that the evidence of design reveals the personal Creator of Scripture. Similarly, so long as the cosmological and ontological arguments are used to argue for the God of the Bible, they are valid. As Van Til asserts (2003, 134), these traditional arguments even presuppose the truth of the Bible, although the skeptic ignores this. Arguments for the historicity of the Bible and Jesus s resurrection should be embraced as well. All true statements can be useful in one s apologetic since all was made by God and is held together in Christ and reveals God in so conclusive a way that all of humanity is without excuse in the face of this evidence (Colossians 1:15-17; Romans 1:18-20). All evidence, when rightly understood, will reveal the God of the Bible and the truth of a biblical Christian worldview. There are some limitations to argumentations from evidence however. As we have repeatedly seen, the unbeliever s root problem is not a lack of knowledge, but an unwillingness to submit to that which is already known (In a Romans 1:18-21 sense). Therefore, no amount of argumentation, no matter how valid and lucid is sufficient to compel the non-christian into the kingdom (Habermas, 2000, 96) if it is considered apart from submission to God. Satan knows 8 Ought is an ethical term. The presence of ethics as a standard presupposes the personal, absolute God of the Bible (see Frame, 1994, 52 and ).

10 Apologetic Method 10 plenty of propositions about God; he just does not know them obediently; he is therefore the embodiment of irrationality (Frame, 2006, 101). Similarly, the non-christian knows God; he just does not know Him obediently (Frame, 1987, and 58). Evaluating evidence for God or the Bible creates a very real danger of communicating to the apologist and skeptic that they are neutral, autonomous judges presiding over God and His Word 9. Reason and empiricism, we have seen, are not valid ultimate criteria for truth; the apologist must avoid reinforcing the misconception that they are. Habermas claims (2000, ) that the apologist is to meet critics on their own (common) ground, using their presuppositions and their methodology. This is a losing proposition from the start as their presuppositions deny God; to act as if God is able to be known by these presuppositions is to reinforce in the skeptic that neutral reasoning is possible or that autonomous reasoning is acceptable. A proper apologetic must express the truth about God, that He is Creator, Lord of heaven and earth, Judge, and Savior (Frame, 2000, 220). Apologetics and the Individual Not all those who ask a reason are asking for the same reasons or with the same prejudices and presuppositions. The loving, gentle, patient, and humble apologist will take the time to listen to the skeptic, recognizing that the only difference between himself and the unbeliever is God s regenerating and sanctifying grace. Apologetics must be flexible enough in form and content to be person-variable (Mavrodes, 1970, 42; Frame, 2000, 222), recognizing some differences among unbelievers objections, concerns, education level, experience, and hardness of heart. The 9 Take Butler s statement (1824, 252) for example, the epitome of what should be avoided as the evidence is considered: Let reason be kept to: and if any part of the Scripture account of the redemption of the world by Christ can be shown to be contrary to it, let the Scripture, in the name of God be given up.

11 Apologetic Method 11 loving apologist will apply Scripture appropriately to each individual s particular unbelief. Schaeffer writes (1983, Appendix A), If we are to deal with people where they are we have got to have enough genuine love for them that we would take seriously what they are preoccupied with 10. We tend to give a person a prepackaged answer instead of having the compassion of Christ If people do not have modern intellectual questions, there is no need of dealing with such questions. The apologist might never speak of presuppositions; he might not present theistic proofs or historical evidences for the resurrection of Christ; he may simply preach the gospel; or he could do all of these. Of utmost importance is that in all of these things the apologist is submitting himself to God as Lord 11 both in his demeanor and in his reasoning as he obediently pleads with the skeptic as an ambassador of Christ to be reconciled to God (2 Corinthians 5:18-21). The skeptic s biggest problem is not that he does not know enough facts or has not thoroughly considered the evidence. Rather, he has suppressed the knowledge of God he already has and is living at enmity with him. Whatever specifics are used in the discussion, the apologist must argue with gospel in mind and faith as the goal. 10 Schaeffer gives an example in a preceding paragraph of the necessity of this concern from preoccupation of the unbeliever: [I]f I were with Paul and Silas in the Philippian jail, and the Philippian jailer said to me, Sir, what must I do to be saved? for me to start talking about epistemology would be horrible. I would say what Paul said: Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved, because the jailer was, on the basis of previous knowledge and events, ready for that answer. 11 This is what Frame (1994, 85-88) calls a presuppositionalism of the heart. Presuppositional apologetics is not distinguishable from traditional methods primarily by form but by the attitude of the apologist s heart.

12 Apologetic Method 12 Bibliography Butler, Joseph, The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed to the Constitution and Course of Nature. Google Books. London: C. & J. Rivington, Cowan, Steven, ed. Five Views on Apologetics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, Craig, William Lane. Reasonable Faith: Christian faith and apologetics. Edited by John S. Feinberg and Leonard Goss. 3rd ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, Frame, John. Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, The Doctrine of God: A Theology of Lordship. electronic ed. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, CD-ROM.. The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God: A Theology of Lordship. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, CD-ROM.. "Presuppositional Apologetics" In Cowan, Five Views on Apologetics, Salvation Belong to the Lord: An Introduction to Systematic Theology. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, CD-ROM. Habermas, Gary. "Evidential Apologetics" In Cowan, Five Views on Apologetics, Johnson, Philip. Darwin on Trial. 2nd ed. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 1993.

13 Apologetic Method 13 Mavrodes, George. Belief in God: A Study in the Epistemology of Religion. New York: Random House, Schaeffer, Francis. The God Who Is There in The Complete Works of Francis Schaeffer: A Christian Worldview. Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, CD-ROM. The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. Wheaton, IL: Standard Bible Society, Van Til, Cornelius. A Survey of Christian Epistemology, in The Works of Cornelius Van Til, ed. Eric H. Sigward. Jackson Heights, NY: Labels Army Company CD-ROM.. Christian Apologetics. 2nd ed. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, CD-ROM. Whitcomb, John Jr. "Contemporary Apologetics and the Christian Faith: Proof Texts for Semi-Rationalistic Apologetics." Bibliotheca Sacra (Dallas Theological Seminary) electronic ed. (October 1977):

WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF

WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF 301 CLASS: PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS BY PROFESSOR JOE WYROSTEK 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 (NIV), 10 I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,

More information

Presuppositional Apologetics

Presuppositional Apologetics by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or

More information

Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9:

Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9: Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 01.23.13 Francis Schaeffer I do not believe there is any one apologetic which meets the needs of all people. And,

More information

Christian Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Lecture III October 15,2015

Christian Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Lecture III October 15,2015 Christian Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Lecture III October 15,2015 I. Presuppositions, everybody has them! A. Definition: A belief or theory which is assumed before the next step in logic is

More information

Cataloging Apologetic Systems. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.

Cataloging Apologetic Systems. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Cataloging Apologetic Systems Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural

More information

Select Bibliography on Apologetic Systems

Select Bibliography on Apologetic Systems Encyclopedias of Apologetics Select Bibliography on Apologetic Systems Campbell-Jack, W. C. and C. Stephen Evans, eds. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics. Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press,

More information

Presuppositional Apologetics

Presuppositional Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Revelation Augustine AD 354-AD 430 John Calvin 1509-1564 Abraham Kuyper

More information

507 Advanced Apologetics BEAR VALLEY BIBLE INSTITUTE 3 semester hours Thomas Bart Warren, Instructor

507 Advanced Apologetics BEAR VALLEY BIBLE INSTITUTE 3 semester hours Thomas Bart Warren, Instructor 507 Advanced Apologetics BEAR VALLEY BIBLE INSTITUTE 3 semester hours Thomas Bart Warren, Instructor Course Description: COURSE SYLLABUS In order to defend his faith, the Christian must have a thorough

More information

TYPES OF APOLOGETICS. Psalms 19; Romans 1

TYPES OF APOLOGETICS. Psalms 19; Romans 1 TYPES OF APOLOGETICS Psalms 19; Romans 1 WAYS GOD REVEALS HIMSELF! General Revelation Creation - Psalms 19; Romans 1 Conscience - Romans 2:12-16 Why do so many reject this message? (Romans 1:21-ff) Imaginations

More information

Classical Apologetics:

Classical Apologetics: Classical Apologetics: It Stands to Reason Historical Roots of Classical Apologetics 1 Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy

More information

Thaddeus Maharaj Book Review: Greg L. Bahnsen - Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended

Thaddeus Maharaj Book Review: Greg L. Bahnsen - Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended About Greg Bahnsen Greg L. Bahnsen became interested in apologetics by reading the writings of Cornelius Van Til in high school and would go on to develop his presuppositional apologetic. He was exceptionally

More information

Facing Tough Questions: Defending the Faith

Facing Tough Questions: Defending the Faith CPC School of Discipleship Fall 2018, Missionary Encounters with Our Neighbors Week 5 Facing Tough Questions: Defending the Faith Opening Questions When do you feel the most insecure about talking about

More information

Excursus # 1: Is my Bible translation trustworthy?

Excursus # 1: Is my Bible translation trustworthy? Words of Life (Part 4) Inerrancy: Are there errors in the Bible? Introduction: These men ask me to believe that they can read between the lines of the old texts; the evidence is their obvious inability

More information

HOW TO ANSWER AN UNBELIEVER FROM SCRIPTURE By Sherry Cumby So you don t believe in God or the Bible as Scriptural truth? Why?

HOW TO ANSWER AN UNBELIEVER FROM SCRIPTURE By Sherry Cumby So you don t believe in God or the Bible as Scriptural truth? Why? HOW TO ANSWER AN UNBELIEVER FROM SCRIPTURE By Sherry Cumby So you don t believe in God or the Bible as Scriptural truth? Why? The word of God is the ultimate authority of the Christian s worldview with

More information

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to

More information

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1 In chapter 1, Clark begins by stating that this book will really not provide a definition of religion as such, except that it

More information

THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE

THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE JAMES M. GRIER, JR. INTRODUCTION P HILOSOPHY traditionally has handled the analysis of the origin of knowledge by making authority one of the four

More information

Apologetics. by Johan D. Tangelder

Apologetics. by Johan D. Tangelder Apologetics (Part 2 of 2) Scripture tells us that the Gospel message is foolishness to those who are perishing. But if that is true, if unbelievers will find the Gospel foolish, then how do we tell them

More information

Midway Community Church "Hot Topics" Young Earth Presuppositionalism: Handout 1 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.

Midway Community Church Hot Topics Young Earth Presuppositionalism: Handout 1 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Midway Community Church "Hot Topics" 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. I. First Things A. While perhaps most Christians will understand something about how the expression 'young earth' is used (especially with

More information

Thaddeus M. Maharaj: Cornelius Van Til The Grandfather of Presuppositional Apologetics

Thaddeus M. Maharaj: Cornelius Van Til The Grandfather of Presuppositional Apologetics Christian apologetics (the reasoned defense of our faith) can seem like a daunting and complicated task. There are so many arguments, methodologies and facts to master it is enough to drive many to frustration

More information

Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of his Thought Reviewed by W. Gary Crampton

Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of his Thought Reviewed by W. Gary Crampton THE TRINITY REVIEW For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare [are] not fleshly but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments

More information

Why Study Christian Evidences?

Why Study Christian Evidences? Chapter I Why Study Christian Evidences? Introduction The purpose of this book is to survey in systematic and comprehensive fashion the many infallible proofs of the unique truth and authority of biblical

More information

Five Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF

Five Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF Five Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF The goal of apologetics is to persuasively answer honest objections that keep people from faith in Jesus Christ. But of several apologetic

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS

AN INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS AN INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS It would be nice if all unbelievers were willing and eager to hear the gospel. It would be nice if all we had to do was tell them about Jesus, and they said something like,

More information

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE OBJECTIVES COURSE TEXTS

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE OBJECTIVES COURSE TEXTS Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama 35243 205-776-5650 Fall 2012 AP8521 Introduction to Apologetics Phone: 205.776.5110 Professor: Mr. Brandon Robbins Class Hours: 2

More information

DEVELOPING AN AGILE APOLOGETIC

DEVELOPING AN AGILE APOLOGETIC CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Effective Evangelism: JAE392 DEVELOPING AN AGILE APOLOGETIC by Douglas Groothuis This article first appeared in the Effective Evangelism column

More information

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS #331 Theology 5: Apologetics and Ethics Western Reformed Seminary (www.wrs.edu) John A. Battle, Th.D. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS Apologetics defined English dictionary definition (Webster) Apology...

More information

Does God Exist? A Simple Apologetic 3 Parts A and B

Does God Exist? A Simple Apologetic 3 Parts A and B A Simple Apologetic 3 Parts A and B Heb 11:6 6 And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him. ESV

More information

The Confessional Statement of the Biblical Counseling Coalition

The Confessional Statement of the Biblical Counseling Coalition The Confessional Statement of the Biblical Counseling Coalition Preamble: Speaking the Truth in Love A Vision for the Entire Church We are a fellowship of Christians committed to promoting excellence and

More information

No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter

No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter Forthcoming in Philosophia Christi 13:1 (2011) http://www.epsociety.org/philchristi/ No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter James N. Anderson David Reiter

More information

A Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil

A Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil Volume 5, No. 1, April 2012 31 A Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil K. Dayton Hartman 1 At its core, the presuppositional response provided in this paper is incomplete. A robust presuppositional

More information

An Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication

An Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication An Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication By Robin Barrett May 12, 2017 Contents Introduction...1 Defending the Methodology...2 The Transcendental Argument...13

More information

Defend Your Faith Lesson 1

Defend Your Faith Lesson 1 Defend Your Faith Lesson 1 IS FAITH REASONABLE? but sanctify in your hearts Christ as Lord: being ready always to give answer to every man that asketh you a reason concerning the hope that is you, yet

More information

FIDEISM AND PRESUPPOSITIONALISM

FIDEISM AND PRESUPPOSITIONALISM Grace Theological JournalS.1 ( 1987) 89-99 FIDEISM AND PRESUPPOSITIONALISM STEPHEN R. SPENCER The oft-asserted view that a presuppositional apologetic is inherently fideistic raises the question of whether

More information

Doctrine of God. Immanuel Kant s Moral Argument

Doctrine of God. Immanuel Kant s Moral Argument 1 Doctrine of God Immanuel Kant s Moral Argument 1. God has revealed His moral character, only to be dismissed by those who are filled with all unrighteousness. Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like

More information

In 2003, Mikel was ordained as a missionary by the Baptist General Conference and is a current member of the Evangelical Theological Society.

In 2003, Mikel was ordained as a missionary by the Baptist General Conference and is a current member of the Evangelical Theological Society. About Mikel Del Rosario - Mikel Del Rosario helps Christians defend the faith with confidence. He is an Apologetics professor specializing in making apologetics accessible to the church. He s taught for

More information

Sir Francis Bacon, Founder of the Scientific Method

Sir Francis Bacon, Founder of the Scientific Method There are two books laid before us to study, to prevent our falling into error; first, the volume of Scriptures, which revealed the will of God; then the volume of the Creatures, which expresses His power.

More information

What Kind of Faith Saves? The Three Levels of Faith as Described in the New Testament:

What Kind of Faith Saves? The Three Levels of Faith as Described in the New Testament: Page1 What Kind of Faith Saves? The Three Levels of Faith as Described in the New Testament: Written by: Dr. Eddie Bhawanie, Ph. D. One major aspect of our work at Atlanta Center for Apologetics is helping

More information

Speak to the Dead: Presuppositionalism and the Proclamation of the Gospel Michael Riley Calvary Baptist Church of Wakefield, Michigan

Speak to the Dead: Presuppositionalism and the Proclamation of the Gospel Michael Riley Calvary Baptist Church of Wakefield, Michigan Speak to the Dead: Presuppositionalism and the Proclamation of the Gospel Michael Riley Calvary Baptist Church of Wakefield, Michigan Credit where it is due: I didn t come up with the title of this session.

More information

The Defense of the Christian Faith By Gerald E. Cumby

The Defense of the Christian Faith By Gerald E. Cumby 1 The Defense of the Christian Faith By Gerald E. Cumby How to Answer an Unbeliever from Scripture: Using the Two-Step Apologetic Approach Note: Apologetics, simply defined, is the defense of the Christian

More information

A Critique of Reformed Epistemology

A Critique of Reformed Epistemology Ch. 2.8: Critiquing Reformed Epistemology 1 Chapter 2.8 A Critique of Reformed Epistemology Training Timothys The model of epistemology being advocated in Knowing Our God puts our Godgiven reason at the

More information

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description COURSE SYLLABUS AP 601 Introduction to Christian Apologetics Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary South Hamilton Campus Fall Semester 2013 Mondays, 2:00 AM-5:00 PM Phone: 978-464-4120 Email: ptsmith@gcts.edu

More information

TH 505 Apologetics - Defending the Faith Summer 2013 Phoenix Seminary

TH 505 Apologetics - Defending the Faith Summer 2013 Phoenix Seminary TH 505 Apologetics - Defending the Faith Summer 2013 Phoenix Seminary INSTRUCTOR: Contact Information: 602 850-8000, x103 fchay@ps.edu Teaching Assistant: Brenda Dinell brenda.dinell@azbar.org Sanctify

More information

A Critical Assessment of Cornelius Van Til Paul Cornford Introduction. Van Til s Apologetic Method Summarised

A Critical Assessment of Cornelius Van Til Paul Cornford Introduction. Van Til s Apologetic Method Summarised A Critical Assessment of Cornelius Van Til Paul Cornford 1994 [An address by Paul Cornford, Pastors and Elders Conference, Tamborine Mt., August 1994 ] Introduction Van Til s apologetical method is known

More information

ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION Christian Apologetics Journal, 11:2 (Fall 2013) 2013 Southern Evangelical Seminary Reviews Norman L. Geisler, Ph.D. Reading the articles by Drs. Jason Lisle, Scott Oliphint, and Richard Howe was like watching

More information

Lesson Components Materials Teacher s Edition Student Activity Book (Preschool) and Student Edition (Kindergarten Grade 6) Resources CD

Lesson Components Materials Teacher s Edition Student Activity Book (Preschool) and Student Edition (Kindergarten Grade 6) Resources CD Scope and Sequence The list below provides a quick overview of the materials contained in the Purposeful Design Elementary Bible series. It is followed by an introduction to the series and sequential grade-by-grade

More information

Genesis 1:1,26; Matthew 28:19; Mark 1:9-11; John 1:1,3; 4:24; 5:26; Romans 1:19,20; 9:5, Ephesians 1:13; 4:5,6; Colossians 2:9

Genesis 1:1,26; Matthew 28:19; Mark 1:9-11; John 1:1,3; 4:24; 5:26; Romans 1:19,20; 9:5, Ephesians 1:13; 4:5,6; Colossians 2:9 Statement of Faith 1 The Word of God We accept the Bible, including the 39 books of the Old Testament and the 27 books of the New Testament, as the written Word of God. The Bible is an essential and infallible

More information

If people are dead in sin, and the message of Christ crucified comes to them as either foolishness or a

If people are dead in sin, and the message of Christ crucified comes to them as either foolishness or a The Spirit of God The Fifth in a Series of Sermons on Paul s First Letter to the Corinthians Texts: 1 Corinthians 2:6-16; Isaiah 64:1-7 If people are dead in sin, and the message of Christ crucified comes

More information

Apologetics. (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other?

Apologetics. (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other? Apologetics by Johan D. Tangelder (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other? The need to defend Christianity against its accusers is as great

More information

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS A. Inductive arguments cosmological Inductive proofs Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS the concept of a posteriori. Cosmological argument: St Thomas Aquinas first Three Ways 1.

More information

A Positive Case for the Primacy of an Evidential Apologetic Method

A Positive Case for the Primacy of an Evidential Apologetic Method Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Other Graduate Scholarship School of Divinity 2016 A Positive Case for the Primacy of an Evidential Apologetic Method Doug Taylor dtaylor116@liberty.edu

More information

Santa Rosa Bible Church Doctrinal Statement

Santa Rosa Bible Church Doctrinal Statement Section 1: Preamble Santa Rosa Bible Church Doctrinal Statement We believe the Bible as the ultimate authority over our lives. As a result, we trust that true Christian unity only comes about by holding

More information

Understanding Our Mormon Neighbors

Understanding Our Mormon Neighbors Understanding Our Mormon Neighbors Contributed by Don Closson Probe Ministries Mormon Neo-orthodoxy? Have you noticed that Mormons are sounding more and more like evangelical Christians? In the last few

More information

Apologetics. Course Description

Apologetics. Course Description Course Description Instructor: Ray Albrektson, Ph.D. Teacher s Assistant: Adam Dixon Th.M. This course will equip you to respond to the basic objections to Christianity that are frequently encountered

More information

Common Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics. by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 1 of 2

Common Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics. by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 1 of 2 Common Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 1 of 2 Every family counselor would agree that family members must understand each other before they can resolve conflict.

More information

ETERNAL SECURITY IN CHRIST by John Stephenson Biblical Worldview Ministries

ETERNAL SECURITY IN CHRIST by John Stephenson Biblical Worldview Ministries ETERNAL SECURITY IN CHRIST by John Stephenson Biblical Worldview Ministries Matthew 6:33; 1 John 2:6; 2 Chronicles 16:9 Revised January 10, 2006 BACKGROUND DISCUSSION Organization This first section presents

More information

Evangelism: Free to Obey

Evangelism: Free to Obey Evangelism: Free to Obey Introduction As a church, we ve been going to the Scriptures over the last month and a half to try and understand what is the only biblical method of evangelism. We ve looked at

More information

Evangelism #3: THEGODTEST

Evangelism #3: THEGODTEST Evangelism #3: THEGODTEST Introduction: WHAT IS THEGODTEST? A tool that helps facilitate discussion of the critical issues of faith, skepticism, and the meaning of life. The central question is: Do you

More information

What do we believe? Statement of Purpose: The Bible: God. God the Father

What do we believe? Statement of Purpose: The Bible: God. God the Father What do we believe? Statement of Purpose: The Bible states clearly that the church is the household of God, the pillar and support of the truth (1 Tim. 3:15) That being the case, this statement of faith

More information

WORLDVIEWS DEFINITIONS

WORLDVIEWS DEFINITIONS WORLDVIEWS An effective method of presenting the Christian faith in a rational way is to explain the Christian worldview. We can compare and contrast our worldviews with other worldviews, to see which

More information

Atheism: A Christian Response

Atheism: A Christian Response Atheism: A Christian Response What do atheists believe about belief? Atheists Moral Objections An atheist is someone who believes there is no God. There are at least five million atheists in the United

More information

A Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework

A Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework RPM, Volume 12, Number 9, February 28 to March 6 2010 A Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework Jimmy Li Jimmy Li is an alumnus of University of California

More information

Van Til s Transcendental Argument Form and Theological and Biblical Basis

Van Til s Transcendental Argument Form and Theological and Biblical Basis Van Til s Transcendental Argument Form and Theological and Biblical Basis Steve R. Scrivener 23 September 2009 Introduction and explanation In this paper I will give: (1) Key passages by Cornelius Van

More information

The Dangers of Liberal Theology

The Dangers of Liberal Theology The Dangers of Liberal Theology By Curt Daniel What is theological Liberalism? There is no one Liberal denomination or creed, nor is it a homogeneous movement. Rather, it is a general tendency towards

More information

Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th

Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th Instead, you must worship Christ as Lord of your life. And if someone asks about your Christian hope, always be ready to explain it. 1 Peter 3:15

More information

THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE

THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE By Kenneth Richard Samples The influential British mathematician-philosopher Bertrand Russell once remarked, "I am as firmly convinced that religions do

More information

THE SUFFICIENCY OF SCRIPTURE IN APOLOGETICS

THE SUFFICIENCY OF SCRIPTURE IN APOLOGETICS TMSJ 12/1 (Spring 2001) 69-87 THE SUFFICIENCY OF SCRIPTURE IN APOLOGETICS Michael J. Kruger * A simple statement from a kindergarten song such as the Bible tells me so is sufficient to prove the truthfulness

More information

The Existence of God

The Existence of God The Existence of God Introduction Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Southern Evangelical Seminary Past President, International Society of Christian Apologetics 1 Some Terms 2 Theism from the

More information

Atheism: a Dialogue between Chuck Colson and An Atheist Friend

Atheism: a Dialogue between Chuck Colson and An Atheist Friend IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 5, Number 40, November 3 to November 9, 2003 Atheism: a Dialogue between Chuck Colson and An Atheist Friend Editors Note: The following Article was composed as an assignment

More information

Christian Evidences. Lesson 1: Introduction, Apologetics, Overview of Our Study

Christian Evidences. Lesson 1: Introduction, Apologetics, Overview of Our Study Christian Evidences Lesson 1: Introduction, Apologetics, Overview of Our Study In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things

More information

95 Affirmations for Gospel-Centered Counseling

95 Affirmations for Gospel-Centered Counseling 95 Affirmations for Gospel-Centered Counseling By Bob Kellemen, Ph.D., http://rpmministries.org Based Upon the Biblical Counseling Coalition s Confessional Statement Luther s 95 Theses for Salvation and

More information

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 06 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 6 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.

More information

JOURNEY BASICS: LIFE IN THE SPIRIT

JOURNEY BASICS: LIFE IN THE SPIRIT JOURNEY BASICS: LIFE IN THE SPIRIT WHAT DOES PLUM CREEK BELIEVE ABOUT THE HOLY SPIRIT? The nine fruits of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) are the by-product of a Spirit-filled life and evidence of spiritual

More information

The Holy Spirit is not personal, it a force of God; or The Christian life is one of perfection and you can reach sinless perfection in this life.

The Holy Spirit is not personal, it a force of God; or The Christian life is one of perfection and you can reach sinless perfection in this life. JOURNEY BASICS: LIFE IN THE SPIRIT WHAT DOES PLUM CREEK BELIEVE ABOUT THE HOLY SPIRIT? The nine fruits of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) are the by-product of a Spirit-filled life and evidence of spiritual

More information

The Value of Christian Doctrine and Apologetics

The Value of Christian Doctrine and Apologetics The Value of Christian Doctrine and Apologetics Dr. Michael Gleghorn makes a case for why Christian doctrine and apologetics are important for spiritual growth and maturity. Just prior to beginning college,

More information

Apologetics Cru Institute of Biblical Studies January 25-29, 2016 Instructor: Alan Scholes, Ph.D.

Apologetics Cru Institute of Biblical Studies January 25-29, 2016 Instructor: Alan Scholes, Ph.D. Apologetics Cru Institute of Biblical Studies January 25-29, 2016 Instructor: Alan Scholes, Ph.D. Course Description This course will equip you to respond to basic objections to Christianity frequently

More information

INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS

INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS RTS Washington DC Spring, 2013 Professor: William Edgar The Christian faith is not true because it works. It works because it is true. No issue is so fundamental both to the

More information

Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture

Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture By Gary R. Habermas Central to a Christian world view is the conviction that Scripture, both the Old and New Testaments, comprises God's word to us. What sort of

More information

Worldview Philosophy of Christian Education

Worldview Philosophy of Christian Education Worldview Philosophy of Christian Education Biblical Foundation The CLASS program is committed to an educational philosophy which is not after the traditions of men, or the principles of this world, but

More information

Review of Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction, by John M. Frame, (Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing Co., 1994) $14.99, paper. 265 pages.

Review of Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction, by John M. Frame, (Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing Co., 1994) $14.99, paper. 265 pages. Review of Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction, by John M. Frame, (Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing Co., 1994) $14.99, paper. 265 pages. By Jerry W. Crick Contra Mundum, No. 14, Winter/Spring

More information

Living in Christ: First and Second Corinthians

Living in Christ: First and Second Corinthians Living in Christ: First and Second Corinthians Diocese of West Texas Fall 2012 SESSION TWO The Logic of the Cross: 1 Corinthians 1:17-2:5 A. THE LOGIC OF THE CROSS 1 Corinthians 1:17 For Christ did not

More information

2 Corinthians 5: Stanly Community Church

2 Corinthians 5: Stanly Community Church The wonder of Christ s incarnation is not only that God the Son assumed the likeness of humanity but that, in His humanity, He died for our sins. Likewise, to be a Christian is more than just believing

More information

IMPLEMENTING GOD S WORD... YEAR FIVE FALL QUARTER CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS 1 SUNDAY SCHOOL CURRICULUM FOR HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH SSY05F

IMPLEMENTING GOD S WORD... YEAR FIVE FALL QUARTER CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS 1 SUNDAY SCHOOL CURRICULUM FOR HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH SSY05F IMPLEMENTING GOD S WORD... YEAR FIVE FALL QUARTER CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS 1 SSY05F SUNDAY SCHOOL CURRICULUM FOR HIGH SCHOOL YOUTH IMPLEMENTING GOD S WORD... YEAR FIVE FALL QUARTER CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS

More information

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW [JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (2 vols.; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). xxxviii + 1172 pp. Hbk. US$59.99. Craig Keener

More information

Words of Life (Part 1) Revelation: Has God Spoken? Introduction:

Words of Life (Part 1) Revelation: Has God Spoken? Introduction: Words of Life (Part 1) Revelation: Has God Spoken? Introduction: When we embrace everything the Bible says about itself, then and only then will we believe what we should believe about the word of God,

More information

Introduction. A. The Myths of the Modern Mindset. Prayer

Introduction. A. The Myths of the Modern Mindset. Prayer Class #2: Thinking God's Thoughts: Philosophy of Special Revelation Shoring up the Foundation: Biblical Authority in an Age that Questions Everything 9/30/2012 Introduction Prayer Q1: Isn't accepting the

More information

SYLLABUS Southern Evangelical Seminary

SYLLABUS Southern Evangelical Seminary SYLLABUS Southern Evangelical Seminary AP464/564 Presenting Apologetics: Presentation Skills & Tactics Dr. Frank Turek (704) 845-1997 (office) E-Mail: FTurek@usa.com May 2016 COURSE DESCRIPTION and OBJECTIVES

More information

INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS

INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS RTS Washington DC Fall, 2011 Professor: William Edgar The Christian faith is not true because it works. It works because it is true. No issue is so fundamental both to the searcher

More information

Foundation Study 8: Salvation

Foundation Study 8: Salvation Foundation Study 8: Salvation What do the following verses say about salvation? 1. Colossians 1:13 Salvation means to be saved or rescued. Other words that describe salvation include cure, remedy, recovery,

More information

FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page i APOLOGETICS TO THE GLORY OF GOD

FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page i APOLOGETICS TO THE GLORY OF GOD FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page i APOLOGETICS TO THE GLORY OF GOD FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page ii FRAME, Apologetics_cxd

More information

Miracles. Miracles: What Are They?

Miracles. Miracles: What Are They? Miracles Miracles: What Are They? Have you noticed how often the word miracle is used these days? Skin creams that make us look younger; computer technology; the transition of a nation from oppression

More information

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs Dr. Richard Spencer June, 2015 Our Purpose Theistic proofs and other evidence help to solidify our faith by confirming that Christianity is both true and reasonable.

More information

Reasons We Don t Believe The Bible Isn t Trustworthy

Reasons We Don t Believe The Bible Isn t Trustworthy March 18, 2018 College Park Church Reasons We Don t Believe The Bible Isn t Trustworthy 2 Peter 1:16-21 Mark Vroegop 16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power

More information

The challenge for evangelical hermeneutics is the struggle to make the old, old

The challenge for evangelical hermeneutics is the struggle to make the old, old Goldsworthy, Graeme. Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation. Downer s Grove: IVP Academic, 2006. 341 pp. $29.00. The challenge for evangelical hermeneutics

More information

Be Ready to Defend! ; Eastside Pittsburgh Church. Scripture Reading: 1 Peter 3:13-17

Be Ready to Defend! ; Eastside Pittsburgh Church. Scripture Reading: 1 Peter 3:13-17 Be Ready to Defend! 10-5-14; Eastside Pittsburgh Church Scripture Reading: 1 Peter 3:13-17 It was dangerous world to live in during the first century if you had faith in Jesus Christ. Peter in his first

More information

The Collected Works of John M. Frame. Volume 1

The Collected Works of John M. Frame. Volume 1 The Collected Works of John M. Frame Volume 1 NEW DVD and CD-ROM available from P&R Publishing (www.prpbooks.com) and Bits&Bytes, Inc. (www.bitsbytescomputer.com) This new software provides you with Dr.

More information

When they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.

When they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. "When they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women." Acts 8:12 Christian baptism is an act of worship, taking

More information

Trinitarianism. Millard Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 290. Copyright , Reclaiming the Mind Ministries.

Trinitarianism. Millard Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 290. Copyright , Reclaiming the Mind Ministries. Trinitarianism The doctrine of God is the central point for much of the rest of theology. One s view of God might even be thought of as supplying the whole framework within which one s theology is constructed,

More information

ARE YOU READY? 4/18/13

ARE YOU READY? 4/18/13 ARE YOU READY? LOVE THE LORD WITH ALL YOUR MIND Lecture 1 The Need for Apologetics in a World of Confusion We live in what may be the most anti- intellectual period in the history of Western civilization.

More information

1/5. The Critique of Theology

1/5. The Critique of Theology 1/5 The Critique of Theology The argument of the Transcendental Dialectic has demonstrated that there is no science of rational psychology and that the province of any rational cosmology is strictly limited.

More information