By Dr. Donald A. Nash

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "By Dr. Donald A. Nash"

Transcription

1 trustworthiness of the Bible today that at any time in the past century. Even the famous archeologist Nelson Glueck, though not considered conservative, admits, It may be stated categorically that no archeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Sources of archeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible. Brown further testified: An hundred and fifty years ago we knew virtually nothing about the ancient Near East, except what the Bible itself reported. As our accurate knowledge of Biblical times has advanced, opinions downgrading the authority of the Bible have had to be abandoned in case after case. Werner Keller has presented this in popular form in the The Bible as History and more scholarly treatments are readily available. The work of Kenneth A. Kitchen of the University of Liverpool shows how many of the results of nineteenth and twentieth century Biblical (higher) criticism, tending to minimize the reliability of the Old Testament, have themselves been refuted by genuine historical research on the basis of archeological discoveries. By Dr. Donald A. Nash It is generally understood in statements on inerrancy that the doctrine applies to the original autographs penned in the Hebrew and Greek by the divine writers. Errantists make much of this by saying we do not have the original autographs so we have no inerrant Bible. Several facts should be brought out here. First, for all practical purposes we do have the original autographs, at least of the New Testament, and the Dead Sea Scrolls have done much to confirm the Old Testament manuscripts. From the thousands of ancient manuscripts available, years of diligent research by textual critics has delivered to us for all practical purposes the original text of the New Testament. (Remember that through the words of Jesus himself and the Spirity-inspired apostles under the promise of Jesus, the Old Testament was accepted and quoted as infallibly inerrant.) As to the text of the New Testament the testimony of Frederick Kenyon is quite conclusive: 8

2 Some writers on this subject have claimed that it is impossible to define inerrancy. This is ridiculous. Inerrancy plainly means without error or mistakes. It does not deal with a method of inspiration by the result of inspiration a faultless Bible with no mistakes either historically or doctrinally. The Bible claims to be the inspired word of God, it is inevitable and logical that it is without error. Dr. Benjamin B Warfield explained inspiration thus, Inspiration is, therefore, usually defined as a supernatural influence exerted on the sacred writers by the Spirit of God, by virtue of which their writings are given divine trustworthiness. Biblical scholars form earliest times accepted this as meaning that there are no errors in the Bible. Irenaeus, taught by Polycarp, a student of the apostle John, said, The Holy Spirit was co-worker with the evangelists in the composition of the gospels and therefore eliminates lapses of memory, error or falsehood. Augustine said, I believe most firmly that not on of these authors are erred in any respect in writing. Calvin stated, The Scriptures are the certain and unerring rule. Alexander Campbell affirmed, Everything God has spoken is true. God is truth nothing is so certain, so durable, so unchangeable as the Word of the Lord. There is no error in it. There can be no error in the most strict and exact conformity to it; for it shall stand forever. W.E. Garrison, in the preface to the book on the history of the Restoration Movement by A.T. DeGroot, Disciple Thought: A History, wrote, In the earliest history all of them (restoration forefathers) held to such a theory of inspiration as would guarantee the absolute inerrancy of the Bible in every particular. Virtually all Christians held this view. Alexander Campbell said, Revelation and inspiration properly so called have to do only with such subjects as are supernatural or beyond the reach of human intellect in its most cultivate and elevated state. In this sense Holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. But besides this inspiration of original and supernatural ideas, there was another species of supernatural aid afforded the saints who wrote the historical part of the Scriptures. There was a revival in their minds of that they themselves had seen and heard; and in reference to the traditions handed down, such a superintendency of the Spirit of wisdom and knowledge which excluded the possibility of mistakes of the matter of facts which they recorded. the Bible, but the examples they cite, for the most part, were discovered long before our time. In Why We Believe James Jauncey, M.D. denies the higher Biblical criticism that find these errors by testifying: I was fortunate to study Biblical criticism after a thorough training in scientific method. I was appalled at what I found. Conclusions were either formed on the most inadequate premises, or the methods were hopelessly unscientific. The worst feature was prejudice. In many cases it was glibly assumed that God never acted in a supernatural way, that Biblical writers were ignorant or deceivers and that our armchair guesswork is so much more accurate than their own estimates of times and events. The Bible has shown itself capable of standing up to any test. Thus those of us who are convinced that the Bible comes from God welcome any study on the Bible or any text of the Bible. But for us to take serious note of the results the studies have to be objective and solidly based on facts. Actually through historical study and archeological research, so-called errors of the past are being proven true. Benjamin Warfield says in his book, Inspiration and Authority of the Bible, Moreover, as every student of the history of exegesis and criticism knows they (the alleged mistakes) are progressively vanishing in quantity. Those who seemed most obvious and intractable a generation ago remain today as only to readily forgotten warning against the inordinate dogmatism of the opponents of the inerrancy of the Bible who override continually every canon of historical and critical caution in their eager violence against the doctrine they assail. William F. Albright, the famous archeologist, remarked in his book, The Archeology of Palestine, Archeology after a long silence has finally corroborated Biblical tradition in no uncertain way. In another place he said, Biblical historical data are accurate to an extent far surpassing the ideas of any modern critical student. New discoveries continue to confirm the historical accuracy of the literary antiquities in detail after detail. Because of such findings, Dr. Harold O.J. Brown says, It is easier to believe in the complete trustworthiness of the Bible today that at any time in the past century. 7

3 evidently because he was a physician, but this does not mean the story is not true. New Testament writes might loosely quote an Old Testament prophecy buy guided by the Holy Spirit they were quoting it to show the real point of the prophecy. Some of these free citations can be accounted for by the fact that they sometimes used the original Hebrew, sometimes the Septuagint Greek text, or sometimes, combined Scriptures under divine guidance to illustrate and prove the point they were making. If we accept the fact of inspiration by the Holy Spirit these should not be considered errors. In regard to reporting of falsehoods, the well-known and logical hermeneutical rule must be followed that when studying Scriptures you ask who is speaking and to whom and why. A sacred writer might report under divine inspiration a statement of an uninspired person that is obviously false, and any reasonable reader realizes this. The Gospel writers tell us that Herod said Jesus was John the Baptist raised from the dead. Obviously this is not true but is told to us under inspiration to show how ignorant Herod was. With these so-called exclusions in mind where are the socalled mistakes of the Bible? Who discovered these mistakes? One writer says the uncovering of these errors is the result of modern historical research, which began to flourish with the nineteenth century. In reply to this Harold O.J. Brown in, The Protest of a Troubled Protestant replies: On the one hand, it is true that nineteenth century scholarship puts its finger on a large number of problematical passages in the Bible which challenge the concept of inerrancy. On the other hand, it is surprising how long Christians have known most of them. The alleged factual error and internal contradictions in Scripture which are currently cited to demonstrate the impossible archaic nature of inerrancy are themselves impossibly archaic in a high proportion of instances. Explanations of them have been known for centuries. Whether or not the explanations are accepted as conving or whether one finds the evidences for errors and contradictions too strong usually depends on other factors besides the evidences and the arguments. Modern theologians have a different set of reasons why they believe in the fallibility of Elsewhere he said, The persons who are employed to make these communications are so supernaturally guided as to make them infallible witnesses in all the facts they attest, as well as all communications concerning supernatural things. Some errantists affirm that the Bible does not claim to be without mistakes. Jesus plainly said in John 10:35, The Scripture cannot be broken. This can mean nothing more or less than that He took the Old Testament Scriptures as infallibly accurate in every respect. A modern translation could easily render it, the Scriptures are without error. In fact, the Living Bible does translate it which (Scriptures) cannot be untrue. In John 16: 13 Jesus promised the disciples He would guide them into all truth. This has to mean their writings would be without error. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 2: says that he speaks with words the Holy Spirit teaches. This would be a declaration of a very close verbal inspiration that was without error if even the words were guided by the Spirit (this point will be discussed later). F.F. Grant, in his Introduction to the New Testament, even though an admitted liberal, confesses, Everywhere in the New Testament it is taken for granted that what is written in the Scriptures is the work of diving inspiration and is therefore trustworthy, infallible and inerrant. No New Testament writer would dream of questions a statement contained in the Old Testament. One reason erranists claim that inerrancy cannot be defined is that the Chicago Conference on Inerrancy made what was called exceptions or exclusions that left the definition too broad. These so-called exclusions were just rebuttals to charges of mistakes in the Bible, claiming they were not really mistakes so they in no way changed the basic definition of inerrancy as meaning the Bible is without mistakes. What were these exclusions? 1. The lack of technical precision. 2. Irregularities of grammar or spelling. 3. Observational descriptions of nature. 4. Reporting of falsehoods. 5. The use of hyperbole. 6. Round numbers. 7. Topical arrangement of materials in parallel accounts. 8. Use of free citation in prophecy quotations. Are these mistakes? Let us consider them. 6 3

4 If the New Testament writers had spoken in modern technical language the people of that day would not have understood them. Such expressions as the four winds and the four corners of the earth are still used illustratively today. Yet the Bible is accurate on many points of science far beyond its times. As an example Isaiah speaks of the Lord sitting on the circle of the earth. Many of the observational descriptions of nature are poetic in nature and would not be considered errors in modern writings. Irregularities of grammar are not errors but the idiomatic expressions of the day and are used for rhetorical style. They were understood by the people of the day and did not convey falsehood to them. For example, in Greek a neuter plural noun takes a singular verb. This would be a grammatical mistake in English but was the acceptable and regular idiom of the day. Child is a neuter noun in Greek. So the statement is written, Children is coming instead of the proper English are coming. This was a correct idiom of the day. The so-called Pindar construction would be incorrect grammatically in English in which a compound subject such as winds and waves takes a singular verb obeys His will. The purpose of this idiom was to give a unitive force to the compound subject and was perfectly understandable to the original readers. So, also incomplete sentences called anacoluthon were used rhetorically as often is done today and as long as they conveyed no false idea to the reader are not to be considered errors. Misspelled words could be the result of two different spellings or an error in scribal transmission which is easily detected as we will see later. Peter s name is spelled both Simon and Simeon in original manuscripts. I saw a man win a large prize on TV with the spelling of through as thru. No one considered this an error but a variation of spelling. One writer attacking inerrancy said rather blasphemously, It is difficult to take inerrantists seriously when they cannot even trust God to spell correctly or use proper grammar! I think the shoe is on the other foot. The evangelical errantist who still claims he believes the Bible to be inspired and authoritative is the one who is calling these so-called grammatical mistakes errors, not the inerrantist. The inerrantist is saying these are not errors but God using the style of the author in the language of the day to convey truth which was understandable to the people and not considered mistakes by them. Why should round numbers be considered errors? We cannot force God to give us the exact number if He did not see fit to do so. There is no mistake in the historical fact that about 3,000 were saved on the day of Pentecost. It would only be a mistake if it were about 25,000, but who is to prove such a difference? Even when round numbers seem contradictory there can be an explanation. I read two different newspaper accounts of attendance at a ball game. One said 54,700, another 49,800. Was one figure in error? On investigation, one was giving the total attendance and one was giving the paid attendance. If we would take on faith the Bible-stated fact that it is without error (John 10:35) we would try to reconcile seeming contradictions and find that generally they are just as easily reconciled as the ball game figures. Hyperbole s have been accepted and recognized in every language and not considered in other writings as errors, so why criticize the Bible for them? John said the world could not contain the books if all were written about Christ (John 21:25), but prefixed his remark with I suppose showing it was hyperbolic in nature, which everyone understands. Even this remark has some prophetic truth toi t for I suppose that if all the books written about Christianity were put together in one place no library in the world could hold them> Luke said the people were gathered at Pentecost from all nations under heavens (Acts 2:5). Though a hyperbole, it was understood to mean the entire known Roman world, and Josephus attests to this quoting Herod Agrippa as saying, There is no nation in the world that does not contain some of us (Jews). It is true the Gospel writers arrange their materials differently, but nothing they say is untrue or historically in error. Different teachers will teach the same subject but arrange their material differently, yet both teach the same truth. Some will leave out material others use. This, for example, is the purpose of the four Gospels, to give us variant testimonies, yet all of them true. Only Luke sees fit to tell of Jesus healing Malchus ear, evidently because he was a physician, but this does not mean the story is not true. New Testament writes might loosely quote an Old Testament prophecy buy guided by the Holy Spirit they were quoting it to show the real point of the prophecy. Some of these free citations 4 5

5 This booklet is offered courtesy of: The Discipleship Ministry at The Church of Christ at Mountain View. 153 Narrow Lane Winchester, VA Questions: call Chris Straley at (540) (540) no other work of Greek or Latin literature do we possess manuscripts so plentiful in number or so near the date of composition. Add to this the conclusions of famous Greek scholars Wescott and Hort whose Greek New Testament edition was for years used as the authoritative Greek New Testament for students of the original language. They testify: This brief account of the text of the New Testament would be incomplete without a word of caution against a natural misunderstanding. Since textual criticism has various usages as its subject, and the discrimination of genuine readings from corruptions as its aim, discussions on textual criticism almost inevitably obscures the simple fact that variations are but secondary incidents of a fundamentally single and identical text. In the New Testament in particular it is difficult to escape an exaggerated impression as to the proportion which the words subject to variation bear on the whole text, and also, in most cases as to their intrinsic importance. It is not superfluous to state explicitly that the great bulk of words of the New Testament stand out above all discriminative processes of criticism, because they are free from variation and need only to be transcribed. Much to of the variation which it is necessary to record, has only an antiquarian interest, except insofar as it supplies evidence as to the history of textual transmission, or as to the character of some document or group of documents. The whole area of variations between readings that have been admitted or are likely to be admitted into any printed texts is comparatively small; a large part of it due merely to differences between earlier uncritical editions and the texts formed within the last half of century with help of the priceless Documentary evidence brought to light in recent times. A small fraction of the gross residue of disputed works alone remains after application of the improved methods of criticism won from two centuries of investigation and discussion. Why the necessity of an infallible, inerrant, original autograph if we do not have the original? In addition to what was said above about having that autograph for all practical purposes, Gleason Archer has given us a very good answer to such a question in his book, Witness of the Bible to Its Own Inerrancy. He says: 16 9

6 In answer to this, it should be pointed out, first of all, that there is a great difference between a document that was corrupted with error at the start and a document that was few from mistake at its original composition. If the original authors were confused, mistaken, or deceitful, then there is little to be gained by employment of textual critical methods to get back to an approximation of the original form. The errors and misinformation inhere in the archetype itself and serve only to the disadvantage and hurt of the reader. Only if the original was correct and trustworthy is any useful purpose served by elimination of the copyists errors. The pursuit of textual criticism itself implies a trustworthy original, the original working of which has decisive importance. resurrection stories. He scoffs at higher criticism attributing the works of Luke to the literary product of the post-apostolic church. He then concludes, "It is my serious conclusion we have in the New Testament words that bear the hallmark of reality and the ring of truth. I do not know to what extent he is using the word of truth or what force he put on it, but to me it means without error. Archer goes on to illustrate the principle by the fact that we have such inerrant models controlling our daily lives even though we do not have access to the original. In the Bureau of Satndads in Washington, D.C., there is preserved a perfect pound, foot, quart by which all other such measurements are to be judged. Though we do not see the standard models, none deny that they are essential to the validity of the copies. If there were not an originally inerrant autograph from the pens of the divinely inspired writers, then we would not know where the mistakes supposedly in the originals were. We would have to decide what is, or is no an error from our own fallible wisdom, prejudicial decisions and human reasoning. Then the Bible would become worthless as an objective standard of revelation for a religion based on truth. But if there were an inerrant original, we can find the mistakes of copyists in transmission through the highly scientific methods of textual criticism discussed previously and be certain of the reliability of the accepted text and make reasonable decisions as to the trustworthiness of various translations. Another final pint, in regard to the necessity of the inerrant original autograph, is the seeming hypocrisy of the errantists who bring up the idea that we do not have such an original autograph as an argument against inerrancy. Yet, every so-called error they claim is based on the contents of an assumed or accepted original autograph

7 will follow the Scriptures as the road laid out by inspiration and authority of God. If he does not accept the infallibility of the Bible, he must blaze a trail of man s own making, perhaps crossing and re-crossing the truths of the Scriptures, buy never certain of the beginning or end of his journey. The one who accepts infallibility makes God s Word, the Bible, the rule of faith and practice; the one who rejects it, elevates his own mind to the position of final arbiter in his search for right and wrong. But it seems strange that these very Liberals who speak well of Jesus as the rallying point, the very Word of God, will reject His testimony concerning the infallibility of the Scripture. (He cites John 10:35b) One errantist accused those advocating inerrancy of having a maginot line mentality. I don t know what he meant by this, buy I suppose when one stops reasoning he begins calling names. The French Maginot Line may have fallen but the principle is valid. We need a final line of defense beyond which the enemy must not pass, the bottom line as it were for the Christian faith. Surely this is the authority, trustworthiness, integrity and infallible inerrancy of the bible as God s Word. Some might say, I thought the bottom line was that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the Living God, and they would be right. But where do we learn this and find the evidence for it except in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, (for the Old is the New concealed and the news is the Old revealed, with Christ the center of it all and the scarlet cord of salvation the seam that binds them all together)? As Roger Chambers once said in a letter to the editor of the Christian Standard, How can we have an inerrant Christ without an inerrant Bible? J.B. Phillips, translator of The New Testament in Modern English, in a book entitled, The Ring of Truth tells of the spiritual renewal he experienced from the work of translating the sacred words form the original Greek. In it he claims that as a scholar of literature of the ancient world he is confident the New Testament stories are not myths. He says he is utterly convinced of the reliability of the How can we have an inerrant Christ without an inerrant BIBLE? Roger Chambers The claimed historical or scientific errors of any nature are not based on any one version or translation we have today, but on the accepted original autograph. To illustrate what I mean, several years ago critical scholars said Luke made a mistake in the term he used about the officials who arrested Paul at Phillipi. Now, they did not mean that King James was in error by the word magistrates, for this is an English word about which Luke knew nothing. They didn t mean any other version, which might translate the term, officers, policemen, or soldiers. They meant the Greek word used by Like in the original autograph that is accepted by all versions even at the time of the King James translation. Of course, archaeological research, mainly through William Ramsey, has proven Luke to be accurate in every term he uses in what is the accepted text of the original autograph. However, every claimed error of history in the Bible is based on a commonly accepted original, so it is inconsistent to raise this argument against inerrancy on the basis that we have no such original. The errantists say that you have to take in the human element in inspiration and this allows for or demands errors. God used the humanity of Jesus to bring about the wonderful story of redemption, and Jesus never sinned nor erred. If so the message of His atoning death for our salvation is useless. Why should it seem so incredible that the omnipotent God who raised up Jesus from the dead could not inspire men to write without making mistakes? As Harold O.J. Brown asked, Is it unthinkable for men to make reliable statement about God, if He is real and His Holy Spirit is assisting them? He continues, In part modern theology s charge of errors in the Bible is based on it conviction that to err is human rather that then conviction of its humanity being based on discovering and proving actual error. Brown is correct in saying, The human participation is taken into account in the traditional Protestant doctrine of inspiration, which teaches that the writers of the Bible kept their integrity as responsible human beings, while the Holy Spirit preserved them from all error and directed them in all that was necessary to fulfill that purpose. The writer s educational background, literary and linguistic skills, personal stylistic traits, and so on, all had full opportunity to express themselves. Orthodox doctrine has always officially recognized the mystery of the joint human-divine origin of the Bible

8 In this regard Campbell said, But while this inspiration precluded the selection of incorrect or unsuitable words and sentences, the inspired men delivered supernatural communications in their own peculiar modes of expressing themselves. A graphic illustration of the guidance of the Spirit in the use of the correct word is seen in the use of the Greek words theiotes (Romans 1:20) and theotes (Colossians 2:9). These are the only two places these words are found in the New Testament. They are both built from the same root word, theos, meaning God. In the King James Version both are translated Godhead. The NIV differentiates between them, and rightly so, with divine nature in the first instance and Deity in the second. Richard Trench, the famous lexicographer says there is a real distinction between them. The first means merely to have the characteristics of God and the second means to be in reality, God. If Paul had used the second work in Romans where he is talking about the revelation of God in nature there would have been an erroneous implied pantheism. On the other hand, if he had used the first word in Colossians he would have been denying the absolute deity of Christ. So, although only one letter differentiated between the two words on their original forms, Paul in each instance used exactly the right word. Being a learned man he might have known which was the right word to use in each instance and written accordingly but if he had been inclined to use the wrong word the Holy Spirit would have given him words which the Holy Spirit teaches. (I Corinthians 2: 13) A certain type liberal theologian who would deny inerrancy teaches that the Bible is not the Word of God buy contains the Word of God or, as some express it, becomes the Word of God to the individual as he reads. In this manner they separate the historical human section which might contain errors from the doctrinal and ethical material which would be the truth about and from God. As we shall note later this makes each person s own subjective views or existential experience the sole criteria of what is truth and what is not. However, Jesus called the Old Testament the Word of God in Mark 7: 13. Jesus said His words should not pass away and they are contained and recorded for us only in the New Testament Scriptures, which Jesus promised would be guided by the Holy Spirit (John 16: 13). Thus, He is equating whosoever should be ashamed of His words in this world He would be ashamed of him in the coming judgment. At least 42 times the preached words of the apostles which are recorded for us only in the New Testament are called therein the word of God or of the Lord. It is not the purpose, plan or possibility of this discussion to take up any of the so-called mistakes of the Bible, for to discuss one would open the gate to the necessity of discussing all, which would be an interminable task. Gleason Archer, in Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties gives an answer to many of the so-called discrepancies or contradictions. To one with an open mind a little research can solve many of the so-called problems. Harold Lindsell in his book The Battle for the Bible tells of a certain Dr. Mounce who presents four mistakes in the New Testament which he must feel were the most obvious and easily proven. Dr. Lindsell discusses these and gives obvious and simple answers to the problems they present. However, even if we found what seemed to be a matter that is inexplicable to us, humble faith ought to make us realize our own fallibility and lack of all knowledge and wisdom, and admit that there may be an explanation we cannot fathom, or evidence for the Bible account that has not yet been unearthed in archaeological research. Harold O.J. Brown has said, The authority and trustworthiness of the Bible is the crucial issue in Protestantism today, beside which all others are of lesser importance. Why is it so critical an issue John Wesley gave a simple answer to this many years ago, If there be any mistake in the Bible there may well be a thousand. If there be one falsehood in the book, it did not come from the God of truth. If the story of the crossing of the Red Sea is a historical myth, then how can we depend on the Ten Commandments, which followed it as a message from God? If the Gospel writers made mistakes in history, how can we depend on the resurrection and the salvation it implies? If there are any errors in the Bible, our personal subjective opinion becomes the arbiter of truth as to what to accept and what not to accept, and we lose any common objective truth which all Christians can hold valid as the common denominator of unity. As Lewis Foster wrote in 1968 in the Seminary Review, Vol. XIV-No. 2 : The acceptance or rejection of the Bible infallibility stands at the cross roads of a person s belief. If he accepts the Bible as tre, he 12 13

THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY A Summarization written by Dr. Murray Baker

THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY A Summarization written by Dr. Murray Baker THE CHICAGO STATEMENT ON BIBLICAL INERRANCY A Summarization written by Dr. Murray Baker The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy is copyright 1978, ICBI. All rights reserved. It is reproduced here with

More information

The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy

The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy Preface The authority of Scripture is a key issue for the Christian Church in this and every age. Those who profess faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior

More information

Week 8 Biblical Inerrancy

Week 8 Biblical Inerrancy Week 8 Biblical Inerrancy Biblical Inerrancy 9 Weeks 1. Introduction to Personal Discipleship 2. Keeping It Real 3. Current Challenges to Christianity 4. Apologetic Reasoning 5. Does God Exist? 6. Can

More information

The Chicago Statements

The Chicago Statements The Chicago Statements Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (CSBI) was produced at an international Summit Conference of evangelical leaders, held at the

More information

Wheelersburg Baptist Church 4/15/07 PM. How Did We Get Our Bible Anyway?

Wheelersburg Baptist Church 4/15/07 PM. How Did We Get Our Bible Anyway? Wheelersburg Baptist Church 4/15/07 PM How Did We Get Our Bible Anyway? In our study of God s Word this morning we came to Mark 16:9-20, a passage that contains the preface statement in the NIV, The earliest

More information

Valley Bible Church Theology Studies. Inerrancy

Valley Bible Church Theology Studies. Inerrancy Inerrancy We believe the Bible is completely truth in everything it teaches, whether explicitly or implicitly. It more than accomplishes its purpose without failure, it does so without communicating erroneously.

More information

How Can I Trust Christianity and the Bible Are True With So Many Changes and Translations?

How Can I Trust Christianity and the Bible Are True With So Many Changes and Translations? How Can I Trust Christianity and the Bible Are True With So Many Changes and Translations? I recently visited the Museum of the Bible in Washington DC. I was excited to go there, because I thought I would

More information

Manuscript Support for the Bible's Reliability

Manuscript Support for the Bible's Reliability Manuscript Support for the Bible's Reliability by Ron Rhodes Manuscript Evidence for the New Testament There are more than 24,000 partial and complete manuscript copies of the New Testament. These manuscript

More information

Doctrine #2: The Bible: Inspired of God

Doctrine #2: The Bible: Inspired of God Loris First Baptist Church 52 Vital Doctrines of The Bible Doctrine #2: The Bible: Inspired of God Note: Most information based on pages 16-24 of the book Major Bible Themes by Lewis Sperry Chaffer. Some

More information

Let me read to you a brief snippet from a conversation I had with a co-worker a few years ago:

Let me read to you a brief snippet from a conversation I had with a co-worker a few years ago: Equipping Class How to Study the Bible Class 1: What Is the Bible & Is It Reliable? Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the

More information

The Historical Reliability of the Gospels An Important Apologetic for Christianity

The Historical Reliability of the Gospels An Important Apologetic for Christianity The Historical Reliability of the Gospels An Important Apologetic for Christianity Dr. Zukeran provides a succinct argument for the reliability of our current copies of the four gospels. This data is an

More information

The Inspiration, Inerrancy, and Authority of the Bible. What Is Inspiration?

The Inspiration, Inerrancy, and Authority of the Bible. What Is Inspiration? The Inspiration, Inerrancy, and Authority of the Bible by Ron Rhodes What Is Inspiration? Biblical inspiration may be defined as God's superintending of the human authors so that, using their own individual

More information

PRACTICAL HERMENEUTICS: HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR BIBLE CORRECTLY (PART ONE)

PRACTICAL HERMENEUTICS: HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR BIBLE CORRECTLY (PART ONE) CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE P.O. Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: DI501-1 PRACTICAL HERMENEUTICS: HOW TO INTERPRET YOUR BIBLE CORRECTLY (PART ONE) by Thomas A. Howe This article first appeared

More information

The New Testament: Can I Trust It?

The New Testament: Can I Trust It? The New Testament: Can I Trust It? Rusty Wright and Linda Raney Wright examine how the New Testament documents measure up when subjected to standard tests for historical reliability. This article is also

More information

For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding. Proverbs 2:6

For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding. Proverbs 2:6 For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding. Proverbs 2:6 1 This week focuses in on how the Bible was put together. You will learn who played a major role in writing the

More information

TRINITY COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE AND SEMINARY ALLEGED DISCREPANCIES OF THE BIBLE MAIN ASSIGNMENT

TRINITY COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE AND SEMINARY ALLEGED DISCREPANCIES OF THE BIBLE MAIN ASSIGNMENT TRINITY COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE AND SEMINARY ALLEGED DISCREPANCIES OF THE BIBLE MAIN ASSIGNMENT A PRECIS SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR JOHNATHAN PRITCHETT DENESE OF THE BIBLE AP 448/648/848 DAN MCDONALD ID 2150134202

More information

I Can Believe My Bible Because It Is Reliable

I Can Believe My Bible Because It Is Reliable I Can Believe My Bible Because It Is Reliable Introduction. Integrity has the idea of trustworthiness or wholeness. The integrity of a book has been preserved when it has been transmitted without a change

More information

Accelerate Presents - Hot Topics

Accelerate Presents - Hot Topics Accelerate Presents - Hot Topics Can You Really Trust the Bible? Your Neighbour Asks? How can you trust something that was written so long ago and has been copied so many times? How could the authors of

More information

I can sum up this book in one word. It is a VERISIMILITUDE. It means: the appearance of being true or real; something having the mere appearance of be

I can sum up this book in one word. It is a VERISIMILITUDE. It means: the appearance of being true or real; something having the mere appearance of be This book is a sequel to the BJU production From the Mind of God to the Mind of Man. It has the same general and managing editors (J. B. Williams and Randolph Shaylor). 6 of the 7 members of the Text and

More information

Systematic Theology #1: The Bible

Systematic Theology #1: The Bible Systematic Theology #1: The Bible COURSE OVERVIEW The goal of this course is to help students understand some of the major points regarding the major systematic doctrines taught in the Bible. An increased

More information

In Search of the Lord's Way. "Trustworthy"

In Search of the Lord's Way. Trustworthy "Trustworthy" Are the words we have today in scripture really what came from the prophets and the apostles? Can we trust the Bible to tell us the truth? Hello, I m Phil Sanders, and this is a Bible study

More information

THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE. An important foundation that is being shaken

THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE. An important foundation that is being shaken THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE An important foundation that is being shaken Definition Canon of scripture: List of all books that belong in the Bible Why is this important for us today? The Bible no longer is

More information

Like newborn babes, long for the pure milk of the word, that by it you may grow in respect to salvation. 1 Peter 2:2

Like newborn babes, long for the pure milk of the word, that by it you may grow in respect to salvation. 1 Peter 2:2 Basic Christianity Jim Leffel, Instructor Week Four Why should I look to the Bible, anyway? Like newborn babes, long for the pure milk of the word, that by it you may grow in respect to salvation. 1 Peter

More information

WHAT VERSION OF THE BIBLE SHOULD I USE? THE KING JAMES VERSION: GOD S RELIABLE BIBLE FOR THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING CHURCH

WHAT VERSION OF THE BIBLE SHOULD I USE? THE KING JAMES VERSION: GOD S RELIABLE BIBLE FOR THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING CHURCH WHAT VERSION OF THE BIBLE SHOULD I USE? THE KING JAMES VERSION: GOD S RELIABLE BIBLE FOR THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING CHURCH Most people cannot read the Bible in its original languages. While language barriers

More information

Reformation Theology: Sola Scriptura June 25, 2017 Rev. Brian Hand

Reformation Theology: Sola Scriptura June 25, 2017 Rev. Brian Hand Reformation Theology: Sola Scriptura June 25, 2017 Rev. Brian Hand Background The primary issue (or material principle) of the Reformation was how a person is saved (Justification by faith alone or Sola

More information

One Sacred Source The Doctrine of Scripture Know That You Know Godly Doctrine Fueling Godly Deeds December 13, 2009 AM

One Sacred Source The Doctrine of Scripture Know That You Know Godly Doctrine Fueling Godly Deeds December 13, 2009 AM One Sacred Source The Doctrine of Scripture Know That You Know Godly Doctrine Fueling Godly Deeds December 13, 2009 AM Main Sermon Idea: The Bible perfectly reveals Jesus to all of humanity. Introduction

More information

Thy Word is Truth by E.J. Young. Session 1 Presented by Dr. Richard Spencer

Thy Word is Truth by E.J. Young. Session 1 Presented by Dr. Richard Spencer Thy Word is Truth by E.J. Young Session 1 Presented by Dr. Richard Spencer Introduction Young states his purpose clearly: To acquaint the intelligent layman with the Biblical doctrine of inspiration and

More information

Newbigin s and Warfield s Doctrine of Inerrancy. Joseph Moreland

Newbigin s and Warfield s Doctrine of Inerrancy. Joseph Moreland Newbigin s and Warfield s Doctrine of Inerrancy by Joseph Moreland As Christians what we put our confidence in (whether we put our confidence in our own knowledge or in God), how we view the accuracy of

More information

DO WE HAVE EARLY TESTIMONY ABOUT JESUS? Chapter Nine

DO WE HAVE EARLY TESTIMONY ABOUT JESUS? Chapter Nine DO WE HAVE EARLY TESTIMONY ABOUT JESUS? Chapter Nine Evidence that the New Testament is historically reliable Early testimony Eyewitness testimony Un-invented (authentic) testimony Eyewitnesses who were

More information

The Bible: A Road Map for Life. 2 Timothy 3:16-17

The Bible: A Road Map for Life. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 The Bible: A Road Map for Life 2 Timothy 3:16-17 2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that

More information

Which Bible is Best? 1. What Greek text did the translators use when they created their version of the English New Testament?

Which Bible is Best? 1. What Greek text did the translators use when they created their version of the English New Testament? Which Bible is Best? On occasion, a Christian will ask me, Which translation should I use? In the past, I usually responded by saying that while some are better than others in my opinion, virtually all

More information

TXT MSG: How did we get the Bible and can it be trusted?

TXT MSG: How did we get the Bible and can it be trusted? TXT MSG: How did we get the Bible and can it be trusted? W hat is the Bible and how did we get it? Why are these sixty-six books included in the Bible we have, and not other writings? Dan Brown's bestselling

More information

Christian Mentoring from A to Z A Discipleship Ministry for the Local Church Lesson Number 5

Christian Mentoring from A to Z A Discipleship Ministry for the Local Church Lesson Number 5 Christian Mentoring from A to Z A Discipleship Ministry for the Local Church Lesson Number 5 Name of Student: Address: Phone Number: Lesson E = (the) Eternal Word What is the authority in your life? Those

More information

Scripture: Authority, Canon & Criticism Final Exam Sample Questions

Scripture: Authority, Canon & Criticism Final Exam Sample Questions Scripture: Authority, Canon & Criticism Final Exam Sample Questions 1. (T/F) A Worldview is a conceptual scheme by which we consciously or unconsciously place or fit everything we believe and by which

More information

What Does the Bible_ 6/26/07 8:27 AM Page 1 Copyrighted material

What Does the Bible_ 6/26/07 8:27 AM Page 1 Copyrighted material Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations in this book are taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version, Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of

More information

God s Inspired Book #2

God s Inspired Book #2 God s Inspired Book #2 Introduction. Peter C. Moore wrote, Our belief in the infallibility of Scripture arises not from an ability to prove that Scripture is perfect from start to finish. Rather it rests

More information

The Bible Our Firm Foundation

The Bible Our Firm Foundation The Bible Our Firm Foundation A Self Study Resource The Ultimate Guide Take a moment to imagine that you are going on an unguided safari adventure through Africa and since you don t know much about the

More information

Wednesday, February 25, 2015 First Baptist Church Buda Midweek Prayer Meeting & Bible Study

Wednesday, February 25, 2015 First Baptist Church Buda Midweek Prayer Meeting & Bible Study Wednesday, February 25, 2015 First Baptist Church Buda Midweek Prayer Meeting & Bible Study ALL ABOUT THE BIBLE How We Got the Bible Canonicity 2 Timothy 3:16-17, 2 Peter 1:19-21 FOR REVIEW Let s review

More information

Impact Hour. May 8, 2016

Impact Hour. May 8, 2016 Impact Hour May 8, 2016 Why People Don t Believe: 1. The Power of Religion 2. Reason To Fear 3. Religion and Violence: A Closer Look 4. Is Christianity Irrational and Devoid of Evidence? 5. Is Christianity

More information

Present Series--"You and Your Beliefs"

Present Series--You and Your Beliefs Wheelersburg Baptist Church 2/15/06 Wednesday evening[1] "You and Your Beliefs"--Bibliology, part 2 The Bible is a special book. It s why Bob and Shirley Litteral moved to the jungles of PNG in the mid-1960

More information

STUDY QUESTIONS. 1. What NT verse tells us we need to interpret the Bible correctly? (1)

STUDY QUESTIONS. 1. What NT verse tells us we need to interpret the Bible correctly? (1) Biblical Interpretation Western Reformed Seminary John A. Battle, Th.D. STUDY QUESTIONS 1. What NT verse tells us we need to interpret the Bible correctly? (1) 2. Define and distinguish the terms hermeneutics

More information

Allan MacRae, Ezekiel, Lecture 1

Allan MacRae, Ezekiel, Lecture 1 1 Allan MacRae, Ezekiel, Lecture 1 Now our course is on the book of Ezekiel. And I like to organize my courses into an outline form which I think makes it easier for you to follow it. And so I m going

More information

SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY: REVELATION AND GOD Week Four: Biblical Authority. Introduction

SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY: REVELATION AND GOD Week Four: Biblical Authority. Introduction SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY: REVELATION AND GOD Week Four: Biblical Authority Introduction This is the third session in a twelve week study of the doctrines of revelation and God. Last week, we discussed the doctrine

More information

The Bible God s Inspired and Complete Truth By: Charlie Thrall

The Bible God s Inspired and Complete Truth By: Charlie Thrall The Bible God s Inspired and Complete Truth By: Charlie Thrall Please note: that many, many Jews and Christians has given their lives to protect and pass the Holy Bible down through the generations. Also

More information

Sunday, November 22, 2015 Grace Life School of Theology From This Generation For Ever Lesson 9: Understanding Basic Terminology: Preservation, Part 2

Sunday, November 22, 2015 Grace Life School of Theology From This Generation For Ever Lesson 9: Understanding Basic Terminology: Preservation, Part 2 1 Sunday, November 22, 2015 Grace Life School of Theology From This Generation For Ever Lesson 9: Understanding Basic Terminology: Preservation, Part 2 Statement Regarding Future Questions when considering

More information

REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO THE UNITY OF ISAIAH: A STUDY IN PROPHECY BY OSWALD T. ALLIS. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. J. Carl Laney.

REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO THE UNITY OF ISAIAH: A STUDY IN PROPHECY BY OSWALD T. ALLIS. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. J. Carl Laney. REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO THE UNITY OF ISAIAH: A STUDY IN PROPHECY BY OSWALD T. ALLIS A Paper Presented to Dr. J. Carl Laney Western Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course BLS

More information

We believe that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is verbally inspired and the only infallible, authoritative Word of God.

We believe that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is verbally inspired and the only infallible, authoritative Word of God. We know what we know about God because He chose to reveal Himself to those He created. He revealed Himself in the pages of Holy Scripture. As we approach the Word of God with humility, we are able to know

More information

Why Study Christian Evidences?

Why Study Christian Evidences? Chapter I Why Study Christian Evidences? Introduction The purpose of this book is to survey in systematic and comprehensive fashion the many infallible proofs of the unique truth and authority of biblical

More information

THE BIBLE. Part 2. By: Daniel L. Akin, President Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary Wake Forest, North Carolina

THE BIBLE. Part 2. By: Daniel L. Akin, President Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary Wake Forest, North Carolina THE BIBLE Part 2 By: Daniel L. Akin, President Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary Wake Forest, North Carolina Confessions On The Bible Baptist Faith and Message 2000 I. The Scriptures The Holy Bible

More information

Introduction. The book of Acts within the New Testament. Who wrote Luke Acts?

Introduction. The book of Acts within the New Testament. Who wrote Luke Acts? How do we know that Christianity is true? This has been a key question people have been asking ever since the birth of the Christian Church. Naturally, an important part of Christian evangelism has always

More information

What Makes the Catholic Faith Catholic? Deacon Tracy Jamison, OCDS, PhD

What Makes the Catholic Faith Catholic? Deacon Tracy Jamison, OCDS, PhD What Makes the Catholic Faith Catholic? Deacon Tracy Jamison, OCDS, PhD We can understand the Christian act of faith in the word of God on analogy to the natural act of faith in the word of a credible

More information

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs Dr. Richard Spencer June, 2015 Our Purpose Theistic proofs and other evidence help to solidify our faith by confirming that Christianity is both true and reasonable.

More information

McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism

McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism 48 McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism T om R egan In his book, Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics,* Professor H. J. McCloskey sets forth an argument which he thinks shows that we know,

More information

INTRODUCTION. The Case for Christ

INTRODUCTION. The Case for Christ INTRODUCTION Introduction: How would you describe Jesus? Some might say that He was a liar. Others would classify Him as being a lunatic. Others would say that He is the Lord. I believe all of us in this

More information

To walk in the Truth. Peter Mi Isom. Our view of Holy Scripture. God's Word written

To walk in the Truth. Peter Mi Isom. Our view of Holy Scripture. God's Word written To walk in the Truth Peter Mi Isom Continuing our series of occasional articles on sections in the UCCF Doctrinal Basis, Peter Milsom, who is minister of Deeside Evangelical Christian Church in Clwyd,

More information

The Inerrancy of the Bible By Dr. Robert A. Morey Copyright Faith Defenders

The Inerrancy of the Bible By Dr. Robert A. Morey Copyright Faith Defenders The Inerrancy of the Bible By Dr. Robert A. Morey Copyright Faith Defenders Introduction Would you call someone reliable who: Was frequently mistaken on what he believed and said? Contradicted himself

More information

Excursus # 1: Is my Bible translation trustworthy?

Excursus # 1: Is my Bible translation trustworthy? Words of Life (Part 4) Inerrancy: Are there errors in the Bible? Introduction: These men ask me to believe that they can read between the lines of the old texts; the evidence is their obvious inability

More information

Presuppositions of Biblical Interpretation

Presuppositions of Biblical Interpretation C H A P T E R O N E Presuppositions of Biblical Interpretation General Approaches The basic presupposition about the Bible that distinguishes believers from unbelievers is that the Bible is God s revelation

More information

Scriptural Promise The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever, Isaiah 40:8

Scriptural Promise The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever, Isaiah 40:8 C. Introduction to the NASB Because Orwell Bible Church uses primarily the New American Standard Bible (1995), we ll take a little time to learn about this translation. If you use a different translation,

More information

The Inspiration of Scripture

The Inspiration of Scripture THE ESSENTIALS The Inspiration of Scripture Key Doctrines for Starting and Finishing Strong LESSON 5 The human words of Scripture are seen to be divine the way the human man Jesus was seen to be divine.

More information

Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture

Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture By Gary R. Habermas Central to a Christian world view is the conviction that Scripture, both the Old and New Testaments, comprises God's word to us. What sort of

More information

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God (Theopneustos, God-breathed) (2Tim.3: 16) + Lecture II: How Infallible is the Holy Bible?

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God (Theopneustos, God-breathed) (2Tim.3: 16) + Lecture II: How Infallible is the Holy Bible? All Scripture is given by inspiration of God (Theopneustos, God-breathed) (2Tim.3: 16) + Lecture II: How Infallible is the Holy Bible? + History alone allows us to establish the fact that Jews and Christians

More information

The Completeness of the Scriptures

The Completeness of the Scriptures This very important subject must precede the detail study of any scriptures. Most of the confusion about many Bible verses results from the practice of using non scriptural information as determining factors

More information

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 8)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 8) Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level '2002 Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 8) ENGLISH READING: Comprehend a variety of printed materials. Recognize, pronounce,

More information

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7) Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7) ENGLISH READING: Comprehend a variety of printed materials. Recognize, pronounce,

More information

UNDERSTANDING GOD'S COMMUNICATION TO US: THE BIBLE

UNDERSTANDING GOD'S COMMUNICATION TO US: THE BIBLE (An Explanation of the Chart) UNDERSTANDING GOD'S COMMUNICATION TO US: THE BIBLE This flow chart (http://www.journal33.org/bible/html/gw2us.html) illustrates various issues related to the Bible. These

More information

Is Scripture Trustworthy? Understanding How We Got Our Bible

Is Scripture Trustworthy? Understanding How We Got Our Bible Is Scripture Trustworthy? Understanding How We Got Our Bible Pastor Cary Schmidt Wednesday Growth Group April 23, 2014 2 PeteR 1:19 2:2 19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well

More information

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s)) Prentice Hall Literature Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Copper Level 2005 District of Columbia Public Schools, English Language Arts Standards (Grade 6) STRAND 1: LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT Grades 6-12: Students

More information

A summary on how John Hicks thinks Jesus, only a man, came to be regarded also as God

A summary on how John Hicks thinks Jesus, only a man, came to be regarded also as God 1 BASIC BIBLICAL DOCTRINES BIBLIOLOGY WEEK 4 VI. The Inspiration of the Bible A. Definition of Inspiration: "TO BREATH UPON OR INTO SOMETHING" It's that mysterious process by which God worked through the

More information

Christian Evidences. The Evidence of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 08 of 12

Christian Evidences. The Evidence of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 08 of 12 Christian Evidences CA312 LESSON 08 of 12 Victor M. Matthews, STD Former Professor of Systematic Theology Grand Rapids Theological Seminary This is lecture 8 of the course entitled Christian Evidences.

More information

Additional Information on Tools of Bible Study Part 1

Additional Information on Tools of Bible Study Part 1 Additional Information on Tools of Bible Study Part Sources of Information to Help with Interpretation For the interpreter, books (and other written materials) are almost as essential as a saw and hammer

More information

Why We Believe the Bible It is Inerrant

Why We Believe the Bible It is Inerrant August 14, 2016 College Park Church Why We Believe the Bible It is Inerrant 2 Peter 1:16-21 Mark Vroegop 16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of

More information

A Ready Defense for Christianity. 1 Peter 3:13-16

A Ready Defense for Christianity. 1 Peter 3:13-16 A Ready Defense for Christianity 1 Peter 3:13-16 A Ready Defense for Christianity Apologetics: Refers to a logical, reasoned case Defense lawyer Not a way to lead someone to Christ 2 A Ready Defense for

More information

THE INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE Psalm 119:89; Matthew 5:17-18; 24:35; John 10:35; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:19-21

THE INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE Psalm 119:89; Matthew 5:17-18; 24:35; John 10:35; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:19-21 THE INSPIRATION OF THE BIBLE Psalm 119:89; Matthew 5:17-18; 24:35; John 10:35; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:19-21 DEFINITION: VERBAL PLENARY INTERPRETATION Inspiration is the act of God by which He communicated

More information

APPROVED UNTO GOD. BIBLICAL WORLDVIEW: The simplest definition of a Biblical Worldview is to have the mind of Christ.

APPROVED UNTO GOD. BIBLICAL WORLDVIEW: The simplest definition of a Biblical Worldview is to have the mind of Christ. APPROVED UNTO GOD DOCTRINE OF REVELATION When is your faith your responsibility? Age of Accountability Definition: the point when a person is mature enough to understand and to be responsible for their

More information

The Church s Foundational Crisis Gabriel Moran

The Church s Foundational Crisis Gabriel Moran The Church s Foundational Crisis Gabriel Moran Before the Synod meeting of 2014 many people were expecting fundamental changes in church teaching. The hopes were unrealistic in that a synod is not the

More information

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide

More information

Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition

Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition Background The "Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy" was produced at an international Summit Conference of evangelical leaders, held at the Hyatt

More information

Interpreting the Prophetic Word. Rightly Dividing the Word of

Interpreting the Prophetic Word. Rightly Dividing the Word of Interpreting the Prophetic Word Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth Amazing Prophetic Accuracy God s Goal His Son in Flesh Genesis 3:15 Human and Seed of the Woman Genesis 12:3 line of Abraham Genesis 26:4

More information

5. The Bible. Training objective:-

5. The Bible. Training objective:- 5. The Bible To have a knowledge of the inspiration, infallibility and importance of scripture. To also have some understanding of how it got to us. To be able to utilise study methods and tools and also

More information

Canaan Celebration Service

Canaan Celebration Service Sermon Series Canaan Celebration Service 18 November 2018 10 am Level 4 Hall 84 St Francis Rd, Canaan Centre, S328069 Ps Larry Arienzano QUESTIONS WE NEED TO ANSWER: 1. Are The Ancient Documents That Make

More information

PRESENTATIONS ON THE VATICAN II COUNCIL PART II DEI VERBUM: HEARING THE WORD OF GOD

PRESENTATIONS ON THE VATICAN II COUNCIL PART II DEI VERBUM: HEARING THE WORD OF GOD PRESENTATIONS ON THE VATICAN II COUNCIL PART II DEI VERBUM: HEARING THE WORD OF GOD I. In the two century lead-up to Dei Verbum, the Church had been developing her teaching on Divine Revelation in response

More information

STATEMENT OF EXPECTATION FOR GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY FACULTY

STATEMENT OF EXPECTATION FOR GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY FACULTY STATEMENT OF EXPECTATION FOR GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY FACULTY Grand Canyon University takes a missional approach to its operation as a Christian university. In order to ensure a clear understanding of GCU

More information

FOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD

FOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD FOLLOWING CHRIST IN THE WORLD CHAPTER 1 Philosophy: Theology's handmaid 1. State the principle of non-contradiction 2. Simply stated, what was the fundamental philosophical position of Heraclitus? 3. Simply

More information

Basic Bible Principles

Basic Bible Principles Lesson 1 1 Be ready to give an answer Lesson One Introduction I. The Lord's church faces two immense challenges. A. Unbelief. 1. Unbelievers mock anyone foolish enough to put their trust in in the existence

More information

AFFIRMATIONS OF FAITH

AFFIRMATIONS OF FAITH The Apostle Paul challenges Christians of all ages as follows: I urge you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have

More information

Because of the central 72 position given to the Tetragrammaton within Hebrew versions, our

Because of the central 72 position given to the Tetragrammaton within Hebrew versions, our Chapter 6: THE TEXTUAL SOURCE OF HEBREW VERSIONS Because of the central 72 position given to the Tetragrammaton within Hebrew versions, our study of the Tetragrammaton and the Christian Greek Scriptures

More information

2. A Roman Catholic Commentary

2. A Roman Catholic Commentary PROTESTANT AND ROMAN VIEWS OF REVELATION 265 lated with a human response, apart from which we do not know what is meant by "God." Different responses are emphasized: the experientalist's feeling of numinous

More information

How do we know what s true?

How do we know what s true? Series: Which way to God? A respectful Christian exploration of answers from the Mormon Church, Islam, and other belief systems Topic #1: How do we know what s true? a foundation to help us evaluate history

More information

The Holy Spirit and Miraculous Gifts (2) 1 Corinthians 12-14

The Holy Spirit and Miraculous Gifts (2) 1 Corinthians 12-14 The Holy Spirit and Miraculous Gifts (2) 1 Corinthians 12-14 Much misunderstanding of the Holy Spirit and miraculous gifts comes from a faulty interpretation of 1 Cor. 12-14. In 1:7 Paul said that the

More information

Reading and understanding the Bible (A helpful guide to basic Biblical interpretation.)

Reading and understanding the Bible (A helpful guide to basic Biblical interpretation.) Reading and understanding the Bible (A helpful guide to basic Biblical interpretation.) We are so privileged to have access to a Bible, and in our own language. If you do not have a Bible, please make

More information

Liberal Theology Friedrich Schleiermacher ( ). The Father of Liberal theology. Pastored the large and influential Trinity Church

Liberal Theology Friedrich Schleiermacher ( ). The Father of Liberal theology. Pastored the large and influential Trinity Church Liberal Theology Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834). The Father of Liberal theology. Pastored the large and influential Trinity Church in Berlin as well as helped found the University of Berlin. He was

More information

ABRIDGED SEMINAR - PART 2

ABRIDGED SEMINAR - PART 2 ABRIDGED SEMINAR - PART 2 Student s Name: Part 7: A Review of the First Half of the Course Worldview Common Ground What we want to Convince them Existentialism and Nihilismo Validity of Experiences That

More information

ESSENTIALS OF BIBLICAL PREACHING, Fasol SESSION 3 A

ESSENTIALS OF BIBLICAL PREACHING, Fasol SESSION 3 A SESSION 3 A NOTE: Sessions 3 A and B may seem a bit scary and dry. Not to worry; when we look at it in more straightforward terms, it will make sense. And to keep our minds from exploding, we ll be doing

More information

Inspiration of the Bible / COB /

Inspiration of the Bible / COB / Inspiration of the Bible / COB / 10.27.13 Introduction [Slide 1: blank] I have been coming to work dressed like this, in layers. There is the thermal underwear layer, the flannel shirt layer, the sweatshirt

More information

Father Hebert and Fundamentalisml

Father Hebert and Fundamentalisml I Father Hebert and Fundamentalisml BY THE REV. THOMAS HEWITT, M.A., B.D., M.Th. T is made quite clear that the controversy between the S.C.M. and the Evangelical Unions gave birth to this book, Fundamentalism

More information

History and Authenticity of the Bible Lesson 19 English Versions

History and Authenticity of the Bible Lesson 19 English Versions History and Authenticity of the Bible Lesson 19 English Versions By Dr. David Hocking Brought to you by The Blue Letter Bible Institute http://www.blbi.org A ministry of The Blue Letter Bible http://www.blueletterbible.org

More information

SERIES: Entrusted With the Gospel SERMON: Can the Bible Be Trusted? SCRIPTURE: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 SPEAKER: Michael P. Andrus DATE: June 10, 2012

SERIES: Entrusted With the Gospel SERMON: Can the Bible Be Trusted? SCRIPTURE: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 SPEAKER: Michael P. Andrus DATE: June 10, 2012 1 SERIES: Entrusted With the Gospel SERMON: Can the Bible Be Trusted? SCRIPTURE: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 SPEAKER: Michael P. Andrus DATE: June 10, 2012 I want to be very up-front with you this morning. I am

More information

Sola Scriptura or Sola Ecclesia Differences between Protestants and Catholics

Sola Scriptura or Sola Ecclesia Differences between Protestants and Catholics Sola Scriptura or Sola Ecclesia Differences between Protestants and Catholics General (Natural) Revelation Both Protestantism and Roman Catholicism affirm that God s existence can be known by natural revelation.

More information

Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition

Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy with Exposition Background The "Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy" was produced at an international Summit Conference of evangelical leaders, held at the Hyatt

More information