Libertarian Free Will and Chance
|
|
- Hannah Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Libertarian Free Will and Chance 1. The Luck Principle: We have repeatedly seen philosophers claim that indeterminism does not get us free will, since something like the following is true: The Luck Principle (LP): If an action is undetermined, then it is not a free action, or one that the agent is responsible for. If the hard determinists convince us that free will is impossible if determinism is true, the worry still arises: But, perhaps we could still have free will if determinism is false. If the compatibilists convince us that we can in some sense still be free and morally responsible for our actions EVEN IF determinism is true, the worry still arises: But, perhaps we also possess some more satisfying, more ultimate kind of freedom if determinism is false. This is where LP comes in. It is designed to get rid of these worries, hammering the final nail in the coffin of libertarian free will. But, Robert Kane rejects LP. 2. The Case for LP: Reasons commonly given in favor of LP are these: An undetermined event is merely a matter of chance or luck. But, something that results from chance is something that nothing is in control of. But, a free action is one that the agent is in control of. Any action that resulted from indeterminacy would merely result in an involuntary spasm, or seizure. Such events would DIMINISH our freedom, not enhance it. It might cause our hand to jerk as we were trying to write something down or worse, cause our legs to carry us somewhere against our will! If some actions were undetermined, then, we could rewind time to a moment when you were about to make an important decision. The deliberation process would be EXACTLY the same your thoughts, reasons, beliefs, desires, and every characteristic about you and the entire universe and yet, you might choose differently the second time around. This seems to make nonsense of libertarian freedom, since such a decision would be irrational, inexplicable, capricious, and arbitrary. Moral Luck: Consider the last point. Many think that it would make nonsense of praise and blame because everything we do would be a matter of luck. For instance, imagine two worlds, or two possible ways that your life could have gone (as if we rewound time to some moment twice in a row). In both worlds, the entire history of the universe 1
2 is EXACTLY the same up until time t. Before time t, a brief flicker of temptation to steal Smith s car crosses your mind. You spend a while deliberating about it. Here are the pros and cons that you have come up with after deliberating: Don t Steal Smith s Car Tonight You like Smith, and have no desire to harm him You don t like Smith s car (it s old and junky) You already have a car, and don t need another one You have no desire to steal anything You believe stealing is wrong Your disposition is to avoid doing wrong things You would probably get caught and go to jail There is a party tonight that you really want to go to Steal Smith s Car Tonight You might be able to sell it and earn $1000 Now we push play. The first time around, you don t steal the car. The second time around, given EXACTLY these same reasons, you DO! Undetermined, libertarian freedom would seem to deliver the result that, at the end of a deliberative process, ultimately the decision is made by spinning a roulette wheel of chance. In the end, your final decision might be entirely unsupported by your reasons, desires, beliefs, etc. But, why should you deserve any blame for stealing the car in the second scenario if your decision was ultimately just a matter of chance. You were just unlucky enough for the roulette wheel to land on steal rather than don t steal. The argument proposed by opponents of libertarian free will is something like this: The Luck Argument 1. In the actual world, Jones kills Smith at time t. 2. Assumption of the libertarian: There is a possible scenario where the universe is EXACTLY the same as the actual world up until the moment of Jones s action (t), but where Jones does NOT kill Smith. 3. But, if the two scenarios (in the actual world and the possible scenario) are EXACTLY the same until the moment of the action, then the difference is not at all explained in terms of Jones s powers, capacities, states of mind, characteristics, dispositions, motives, etc., at time t, or any earlier time. 4. If whether or not someone does X has nothing to do with a person s powers, capacities, etc., then that person is not responsible for doing X. 5. Therefore, Jones is not responsible for killing Smith. 2
3 3. Against LP: Kane begins by pointing out two errors that defenders of LP make: Undetermined Uncaused: First, it does not follow from the fact that an event is undetermined that it has NO cause. Rather, it can be caused. It just does not have a DETERMINISTIC cause. For instance, imagine a pair of dice. Dice are not indeterministic, but imagine that they are (i.e., that the outcome after I throw them is truly a matter of chance). If the dice come up snake eyes (1 and 1), this outcome was not determined (they might have come up something else; e.g., 6 and 6). But, it WAS caused (namely, the cause was my throwing of the dice). Self-Forming Actions (SFA s): Kane points out that it doesn t need to be the case that ALL free actions are undetermined. Perhaps in the Stealing Smith s Car scenario, your decision IS determined by your deliberation. BUT, that doesn t rule out the possibility that many of the reasons that went into that decision WERE undetermined in the past (for instance, you could have had many undetermined free choices in the past that shaped how you would respond to reasons, or formed your desire to avoid doing wrong, etc.). In that case, your decision would still be one that you are ultimately responsible for, even if it was determined. So, Kane argues, there can be some actions that are undetermined (namely, SFA s), and these actions DO have causes (namely, US). But, how do we make undetermined choices? Kane points out that, in certain situations, there is a conflict in the will. For instance Interview: Johnson is a businesswoman on her way to an important interview. On the way, she sees someone in need, crying out for help on the side of the street. Two competing neural networks activate in Johnson s brain. She has competing wills, tugging at in two opposite directions: (a) She wants to go to her interview, because it is important. (b) She wants to stop to help the stranger, because she feels a moral obligation to do so. Kane says that, in such moments, quantum indeterminacy is stirred up at the neural level such that it is undetermined which of these two neural networks will win (or cross some activation threshold which leads to action), and which one does win is up to YOU. Objection: But, which way one decides in these SFA moments still seems to be a matter of luck or chance. For instance, if nothing determines whether you go to the interview or help the stranger in the example above, then you are not responsible for the outcome! 3
4 Reply: Kane believes that the objector is making the mistake of thinking that agents cannot be responsible for undetermined actions. But, that is clearly false. Imagine that the Luck Argument above is about the following scenario: Luck Gun: Jones is trying to assassinate Smith. Unfortunately, the only gun that Jones has is a luck gun. It is designed such that, when you pull the trigger, it is undetermined whether it will fire or not (e.g., when you pull the trigger, an electron detector detects the position of an electron, and will only fire if the electron is in a particular position). Jones aims the gun at Smith and pulls the trigger. Smith dies. Is Jones responsible for Smith s death in this case? Yes! BUT: Whether or not Jones killed Smith was NOT determined. Therefore, you CAN be responsible for undetermined actions. So, LP is false. Alternatively: Whether or not Jones succeeds is not at all determined by his powers, beliefs, dispositions, etc. Rather, it is a function of the Luck Gun. So, premise 4 of the Luck Argument is false. When we say Jones got lucky, we mean that he succeeded despite the probability or chance of failure (233). But, this does not entail that Jones is not responsible for Smith s death if he succeeds. Rebuttal: But, if THAT were how freedom worked, then indeterminism would merely be like some interference or background noise that sometimes prevented us from doing the things that we were trying to do. But, THAT S not what we mean by freedom. In the Luck Gun case, Jones is already SET on killing Smith. The only role of the indeterminacy is that it might thwart his will. In the Interview case, Johnson in NOT already set on a decision. The role of the indeterminacy is that her WILL ITSELF is undetermined. If Johnson tries to go to her interview, but ends up helping the stranger because of some indeterministic interference, THIS is not what we mean by freedom. True libertarian freedom (at least, in SFA scenarios) requires the ability to intentionally and voluntarily do A at time t, and the ability to intentionally and voluntary NOT do A at time t. (Kane calls this requirement LP*.) Kane s Refutation of LP*: It gets a bit complicated here, but let s go back to the Interview case. This is an instance of a self-forming action (SFA). Johnson has two competing wills. She wills to go to the interview, and she wills to help the stranger. She cannot do both. This stirs up some indeterminacy in her brain. 4
5 But, note that the indeterministic interference goes in both directions, and BOTH stem from HERSELF. Her will to go to the interview interferes with (and ultimately may thwart) her will to save the stranger. Similarly, her will to save the stranger interferes with (and ultimately may thwart) her will to go to the interview. Luck Gun+: Jones is trying to assassinate either Smith or Black. He has two luck guns. They are connected to one another, such that whether each gun fires is dependent on some feature of the other gun. Jones aims the guns, one at Smith and the other at Black, and pulls the triggers. Smith dies. Is Jones responsible for Smith s death in this case? Yes! But unlike in the original Luck Gun case where failing to kill Smith would NOT have been a product of Jones s will in Luck Gun+, if Jones does NOT kill Smith (and instead kills Black), this alternative will ALSO have flowed from his will. In short, Luck Gun+ is an example where EITHER action will be intentional and voluntary, and yet, which is chosen is undetermined. And Jones would be responsible for either outcome. Going back to Interview, WHICHEVER decision Johnson makes, EITHER WAY her action will have flowed forth from her will (since she has two COMPETING wills). So, she will be responsible either way. It is important that, in SFA scenarios, the indeterministic interference flows from one s self. Objection: But, it still seems like, ultimately, whatever she does is a product of chance. Whichever of her two competing wills wins is just randomly decided. Reply: Kane admits that there IS some element of randomness that generates the outcome here. But, it is confused to think that this makes the outcome NOT Johnson s. the whole process is her effort of will and it persists right up to the moment when the choice is made. There is no point at which the effort stops and chance takes over. She chooses as a result of the effort, even though she might have failed because of the indeterminism. ( ) But, either way, she will endorse the outcome. She willed BOTH things. (This is importantly different from the Stealing Smith s Car example, where you would have been like wtf is happening to me!? if you found yourself stealing Smith s car contrary to all of your beliefs and desires. That decision was not an SFA). 5
6 [My own brainstorm on some further criticism: It almost sounds like compatibilism at the end, where you do something of your own free will so long as you identify with the action or approve of it (have a reflective second-order volition toward it, etc.). Is Kane s view just an indeterminism version of compatibilism? Even if Kane s view were possible, it seems like it would only happen in cases where one was 50-50% split between two choices (e.g., Buridan s Ass). Johnson has two competing wills during her SFA choice. But where did these competitors come from? Previous SFA choices? But, where did the competitors come from in those scenarios? At some point, it seems like we are driven back to genetics and upbringing (i.e., Strawson s worry, that we ultimately never get that initial foothold that is required for responsibility, is still a worry).] 6
Bad Luck Once Again. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society Bad Luck Once Again neil levy Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University
More informationKane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention
Kane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention Gregg D Caruso SUNY Corning Robert Kane s event-causal libertarianism proposes a naturalized account of libertarian free
More informationA Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility
A Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility If Frankfurt is right, he has shown that moral responsibility is compatible with the denial of PAP, but he hasn t yet given us a detailed account
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3b Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3b Free Will Review of definitions Incompatibilists believe that that free will and determinism are not compatible. This means that you can not be both free and determined
More informationComprehensive. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
360 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Comprehensive Compatibilism
More informationUnit 3. Free Will and Determinism. Monday, November 21, 11
Unit 3 Free Will and Determinism I. Introduction A. What is the problem? Science! Why? 1. The universe is governed by physical laws 2. People are part of the universe Therefore: People are governed by
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationThe Mystery of Libertarianism
The Mystery of Libertarianism Conclusion So Far: Here are the three main questions we have asked so far: (1) Is Determinism True? Are our actions determined by our genes, our upbringing, the laws of physics
More informationRobert Kane s. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Libertarianism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
294 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Robert Kane s Libertarianism
More informationFree Will: Do We Have It?
Free Will: Do We Have It? This book explains the problem of free will and contains a brief summary of the essential arguments in Ayer's "Freedom and Necessity" and Chisholm's "Human Freedom and the Self".
More informationAlfred Mele s Modest. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Libertarianism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism.
336 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Alfred Mele s Modest
More informationAn Argument for Moral Nihilism
Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Spring 5-1-2010 An Argument for Moral Nihilism Tommy Fung Follow this
More informationHence, you and your choices are a product of God's creation Psychological State. Stephen E. Schmid
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationCompatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued
Compatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued Jeff Speaks March 24, 2009 1 Arguments for compatibilism............................ 1 1.1 Arguments from the analysis of free will.................. 1 1.2
More informationWhat is the problem?
Unit 3 Freedom What is the problem? Science tells us the universe operates according to consistent and unchanging rules Religion tells us that the universe is subject to the rule of God In either case,
More informationWhat is the problem?
Unit 3 Freedom What is the problem? Science tells us the universe operates according to consistent and unchanging rules Religion tells us that the universe is subject to the rule of God In either case,
More informationCausation and Free Will
Causation and Free Will T L Hurst Revised: 17th August 2011 Abstract This paper looks at the main philosophic positions on free will. It suggests that the arguments for causal determinism being compatible
More informationSUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5)
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5) Introduction We often say things like 'I couldn't resist buying those trainers'. In saying this, we presumably mean that the desire to
More informationKane on. FREE WILL and DETERMINISM
Kane on FREE WILL and DETERMINISM Introduction Ch. 1: The free will problem In Kane s terms on pp. 5-6, determinism involves prior sufficient conditions for what we do. Possible prior conditions include
More informationFinal Paper. May 13, 2015
24.221 Final Paper May 13, 2015 Determinism states the following: given the state of the universe at time t 0, denoted S 0, and the conjunction of the laws of nature, L, the state of the universe S at
More informationDoes Theism Imply Determinism? Questions about Hard Determinism. Objections to Hard Determinism, I. Objections to Hard Determinism, II
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationFree Will and the Dialectic of Selfhood: Can One Make Sense of a Traditional Free Will Requiring. Ultimate Responsibility? 1
Free Will and the Dialectic of Selfhood: Can One Make Sense of a Traditional Free Will Requiring * Ultimate Responsibility? 1 El libre albedrío y la dialéctica de la individualidad: se le puede dar sentido
More informationFree Will as an Open Scientific Problem
Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem Mark Balaguer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this
More informationThe Problem of Freewill. Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty
The Problem of Freewill Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty Two Common Sense Beliefs Freewill Thesis: some (though not all) of our actions are performed freely we examines and deliberate about our options we
More informationTo appear in Metaphysics: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
To appear in Metaphysics: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82, Cambridge University Press, 2018. Compatibilism, Indeterminism, and Chance PENELOPE MACKIE Abstract Many contemporary compatibilists
More informationIn his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris. Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE. reviews/harris
Defining free will away EDDY NAHMIAS ISN T ASKING FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE Free Will by Sam Harris (The Free Press),. /$. 110 In his pithy pamphlet Free Will, Sam Harris explains why he thinks free will is an
More informationThe Mystery of Free Will
The Mystery of Free Will What s the mystery exactly? We all think that we have this power called free will... that we have the ability to make our own choices and create our own destiny We think that we
More informationTed Honderich s Semicompatibilism. Determinism
278 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Ted Honderich s Determinism
More informationIf God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang?
If God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang? Daniel von Wachter Email: daniel@abc.de replace abc by von-wachter http://von-wachter.de International Academy of Philosophy, Santiago
More informationLucky to Know? the nature and extent of human knowledge and rational belief. We ordinarily take ourselves to
Lucky to Know? The Problem Epistemology is the field of philosophy interested in principled answers to questions regarding the nature and extent of human knowledge and rational belief. We ordinarily take
More informationMoral Psychology
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 24.120 Moral Psychology Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 24.210 MORAL PSYCHOLOGY RICHARD
More informationDavid Hume. Walter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism. Dan Dennett
David Hume Walter Terence Stace Soft Determinism Dan Dennett 1 Soft determinism Soft determinism combines two claims: i. Causal determinism is true ii. Humans have free will N.B. Soft determinists are
More informationBUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS
BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences Doctoral School in History and Philosophy of Science A Relational Theory of Moral Responsibility and related essays
More informationMANIPULATION AND INDEPENDENCE 1
MANIPULATION AND INDEPENDENCE 1 D. JUSTIN COATES UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO DRAFT AUGUST 3, 2012 1. Recently, many incompatibilists have argued that moral responsibility is incompatible with causal determinism
More informationAm I free? Free will vs. determinism
Am I free? Free will vs. determinism Our topic today is, for the second day in a row, freedom of the will. More precisely, our topic is the relationship between freedom of the will and determinism, and
More informationFree Will [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
8/18/09 9:53 PM The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Free Will Most of us are certain that we have free will, though what exactly this amounts to
More informationFree Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility: An Analysis of Event-Causal Incompatibilism
Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Philosophy Honors Projects Philosophy Department July 2017 Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility: An Analysis of Event-Causal Incompatibilism
More informationWalter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism
Walter Terence Stace Soft Determinism 1 Compatibilism and soft determinism Stace is not perhaps as convinced as d Holbach that determinism is true. (But that s not what makes him a compatibilist.) The
More informationFRANKFURT-TYPE EXAMPLES FLICKERS AND THE GUIDANCE CONTROL
FRANKFURT-TYPE EXAMPLES FLICKERS AND THE GUIDANCE CONTROL By Zsolt Ziegler Submitted to Central European University Department of Philosophy In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationSelf-Forming Actions, Snap Decisions, and Indeterminism: A Problem for Kane s Libertarianism
ISSN 1807-9792 Volume 10, pp. 15 34, 2017 Self-Forming Actions, Snap Decisions, and Indeterminism: A Problem for Kane s Libertarianism Neil Campbell Philosophy Dept., Wilfrid Laurier University 75 University
More informationFreedom, Responsibility, and Frankfurt-style Cases
Freedom, Responsibility, and Frankfurt-style Cases Bruce Macdonald University College London MPhilStud Masters in Philosophical Studies 1 Declaration I, Bruce Macdonald, confirm that the work presented
More informationTHE ASSIMILATION ARGUMENT AND THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT
THE ASSIMILATION ARGUMENT AND THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT Christopher Evan Franklin ~Penultimate Draft~ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93:3, (2012): 395-416. For final version go to http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01432.x/abstract
More informationThis handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Compatibilism This handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first. COMPATIBILISM I: VOLUNTARY ACTION AS DEFINED IN TERMS OF THE TYPE OF CAUSE FROM WHICH
More informationFolk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility: Determinism vs. Reductionism
Folk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility: Determinism vs. Reductionism EDDY NAHMIAS* 1. Folk Intuitions and Folk Psychology My initial work, with collaborators Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and
More informationFour Views on Free Will. John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas
Four Views on Free Will John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas Contents Notes on Contributors Acknowledgments vi viii A Brief Introduction to Some Terms and Concepts 1 1 Libertarianism
More informationA Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism
A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism Abstract Saul Smilansky s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is
More informationPOWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM
POWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM Thought 3:3 (2014): 225-229 ~Penultimate Draft~ The final publication is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tht3.139/abstract Abstract: Stephen Mumford
More informationFree Will. Christian Wüthrich The Nature of Reality
Free Will http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 14 The Nature of Reality Congratulations! Today is your day. You re off to Great Places! You re off and away! Oh, the Places You ll Go! From Dr. Seuss,
More informationA Taxonomy of Free Will Positions
58 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism A Taxonomy of Free Will
More informationFischer-Style Compatibilism
Fischer-Style Compatibilism John Martin Fischer s new collection of essays, Deep Control: Essays on freewill and value (Oxford University Press, 2012), constitutes a trenchant defence of his well-known
More informationTHE LUCK AND MIND ARGUMENTS
THE LUCK AND MIND ARGUMENTS Christopher Evan Franklin ~ Penultimate Draft ~ The Routledge Companion to Free Will eds. Meghan Griffith, Neil Levy, and Kevin Timpe. New York: Routledge, (2016): 203 212 Locating
More informationHard Determinism, Humeanism, and Virtue Ethics
Hard Determinism, Humeanism, and Virtue Ethics The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2008) Vol. XLVI Hard Determinism, Humeanism, and Virtue Ethics William Paterson University Abstract Hard determinists
More informationFree will and responsiblity: indeterminism and its problems
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2002 Free will and responsiblity: indeterminism and its problems Troy Dwayne Fassbender Louisiana State University and
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #23 Hume on the Self and Free Will Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Mindreading Video Marcus, Modern
More informationFree Will. Course packet
Free Will PHGA 7457 Course packet Instructor: John Davenport Spring 2008 Fridays 2-4 PM Readings on Eres: 1. John Davenport, "Review of Fischer and Ravizza, Responsibility and Control," Faith and Philosophy,
More informationDavid Hume, Liberty and Necessity. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII
+ David Hume, Liberty and Necessity An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII + Liberty and Necessity intractable dispute: Do we have free will ( liberty ), or are choices causally determined
More informationPhilosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas
Philosophy of Religion 21:161-169 (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas A defense of middle knowledge RICHARD OTTE Cowell College, University of Calfiornia, Santa Cruz,
More informationThe Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument
The Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument Richard Johns Department of Philosophy University of British Columbia August 2006 Revised March 2009 The Luck Argument seems to show
More informationFREE WILL Galen Strawson
Abstract FREE WILL Galen Strawson Free will is the conventional name of a topic that is best discussed without reference to the will. It is a topic in metaphysics and ethics as much as in the philosophy
More informationFree Agents as Cause
Free Agents as Cause Daniel von Wachter January 28, 2009 This is a preprint version of: Wachter, Daniel von, 2003, Free Agents as Cause, On Human Persons, ed. K. Petrus. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 183-194.
More informationINDETERMINISM AND FREE AGENCY: THREE RECENT VIEWS Timothy O'Connor Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53 (1993),
1 INDETERMINISM AND FREE AGENCY: THREE RECENT VIEWS Timothy O'Connor Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53 (1993), 499-526. I It is a commonplace of philosophy that the notion of free will is a
More informationDaniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause
Daniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause The dilemma of free will is that if actions are caused deterministically, then they are not free, and if they are not caused deterministically then they are not
More informationTwo-Stage Models of Free Will
160 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Two-Stage Models of
More informationMETAPHYSICS. The Problem of Free Will
METAPHYSICS The Problem of Free Will WHAT IS FREEDOM? surface freedom Being able to do what you want Being free to act, and choose, as you will BUT: what if what you will is not under your control? free
More informationTHE SENSE OF FREEDOM 1. Dana K. Nelkin. I. Introduction. abandon even in the face of powerful arguments that this sense is illusory.
THE SENSE OF FREEDOM 1 Dana K. Nelkin I. Introduction We appear to have an inescapable sense that we are free, a sense that we cannot abandon even in the face of powerful arguments that this sense is illusory.
More informationWhy Agent Causation? Timothy O'Connor Philosophical Topics, 24 (1996),
1 Why Agent Causation? Timothy O'Connor Philosophical Topics, 24 (1996), 143-158 I Introduction The question of this paper is, what would it be to act with freedom of the will? What kind of control is
More informationIncompatibilism (1) Anti Free Will Arguments
Determinism and Free Will (4) Incompatibilism (1) Anti Free Will Arguments Incompatibilism is the view that a deterministic universe is completely at odds with the notion that persons have a free will.
More informationSome Logical Paradoxes from Jean Buridan
Some Logical Paradoxes from Jean Buridan 1. A Chimera is a Chimera: A chimera is a mythological creature with the head of a lion, the body of a goat, and the tail of a snake. Obviously, chimeras do not
More informationLIBERTARIANISM, LUCK, AND GIFT. Daniel Speak
0 0 0 0 LIBERTARIANISM, LUCK, AND GIFT Daniel Speak Abstract: According to libertarianism, free will requires indeterminism. Many opponents of libertarianism have suggested that indeterminism would inject
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
More information6 On the Luck Objection to Libertarianism
6 On the Luck Objection to Libertarianism David Widerker and Ira M. Schnall 1 Introduction Libertarians typically believe that we are morally responsible for the decisions (or choices) we make only if
More informationWHAT MORAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRES WILLIAM SIMKULET
WHAT MORAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRES BY WILLIAM SIMKULET Submitted to the graduate degree program in Philosophy in the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationPhilosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University
Philosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University John Martin Fischer University of California, Riverside It is
More informationNote: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is
The Flicker of Freedom: A Reply to Stump Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is scheduled to appear in an upcoming issue The Journal of Ethics. That
More informationReflection on what was said about coercion above might suggest an alternative to PAP:
24.00 Problems of Philosophy, Fall 2010 20. FRANKFURT ON ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES Frankfurt's basic contention is simple: contrary to what we have suggested, it is not true that you are not responsible
More informationChapter 16 The Two-Stage Model to the Problem of Free Will
Chapter 16 The Two-Stage Model to the Problem of Free Will How Behavioral Freedom in Lower Animals Has Evolved to Become Free Will in Humans and Higher Animals Robert O. Doyle Abstract Random noise in
More informationCausation and Freedom * over whether the mysterious relation of agent- causation is possible, the literature
Causation and Freedom * I The concept of causation usually plays an important role in the formulation of the problem of freedom and determinism. Despite this fact, and aside from the debate over whether
More informationPsychological Egoism, Hedonism and Ethical Egoism
Psychological Egoism, Hedonism and Ethical Egoism It s all about me. 2 Psychological Egoism, Hedonism and Ethical Egoism Psychological Egoism is the general term used to describe the basic observation
More informationExperimental Philosophy and the Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism: A Survey
Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science Vol.22 (2014) 17 37 17 Experimental Philosophy and the Compatibility of Free Will and Determinism: A Survey Florian Cova and Yasuko Kitano Abstract
More informationFree Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It. by R. E. Hobart (= Dickinson S. Miller) Mind, Vol XLIII, Number 169 (January, 1934)
Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It by R. E. Hobart (= Dickinson S. Miller) Mind, Vol XLIII, Number 169 (January, 1934) Preamble -- Free will and determinism are compatible.
More informationLiving Without Free Will
Living Without Free Will DERK PEREBOOM University of Vermont PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
More informationChapter Six Compatibilism: Mele, Alfred E. (2006). Free Will and Luck. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Chapter Six Compatibilism: Objections and Replies Mele, Alfred E. (2006). Free Will and Luck. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Overview Refuting Arguments Against Compatibilism Consequence Argument van
More informationA New Argument Against Compatibilism
Norwegian University of Life Sciences School of Economics and Business A New Argument Against Compatibilism Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum Working Papers No. 2/ 2014 ISSN: 2464-1561 A New Argument
More informationBoethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, book 5
Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, book 5 (or, reconciling human freedom and divine foreknowledge) More than a century after Augustine, Boethius offers a different solution to the problem of human
More informationIndeterminist Free Will
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXX, No. 3, May 2005 Indeterminist Free Will STORRS MCCALL McGill University E. J. LOWE University of Durham The aim of the paper is to prove the consistency
More informationDeterminism defined: Every event has a cause/set of causes; if its cause occurs, then the effect must follow.
Determinism defined: Every event has a cause/set of causes; if its cause occurs, then the effect must follow. In the assigned reading by David Hume, Hume calls determinism the principle of necessity and
More informationQuinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA)
Quinn s Doctrine of Doing and Allowing (DDA) 1. Against Foot & Bennett: Recall Philippa Foot s proposal: Doing harm is initiating or sustaining a harmful sequence. (And allowing harm is failing to prevent
More informationFailure Proofing B. Rick Lynch. presented by
Failure Proofing B presented by Rick Lynch rdsl@aol.com 206-547-1269 Staying Hopeful The research of Martin Seligman at the University of Pennsylvania shows that people remain hopeful in the face of adversity
More informationFree Will and Determinism
Free Will and Determinism Learning objectives: To understand: - The link between free will and moral responsibility The ethical theories of hard determinism, libertarianism and soft determinism or compatilbilism
More informationHABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2007 HABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems Michael Quante In a first step, I disentangle the issues of scientism and of compatiblism
More informationThe Standard Argument
26 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Semicompatibilism The
More informationFREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY. James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA RESEARCH TEAM James J. Lee, Department of Psychology Matt McGue, Department
More informationThe Consequence Argument
2015.11.16 The Consequence Argument The topic What is free will? Some paradigm cases. (linked to concepts like coercion, action, and esp. praise and blame) The claim that we don t have free will.... Free
More informationAnswers to Five Questions
Answers to Five Questions In Philosophy of Action: 5 Questions, Aguilar, J & Buckareff, A (eds.) London: Automatic Press. Joshua Knobe [For a volume in which a variety of different philosophers were each
More informationPreface. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism. Impossibilism.
xvi Illusionism Impossibilism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism Soft Incompatibilism Source Incompatibilism
More informationDavid Hume. On Compatibility
David Hume On Compatibility Necessity and Freedom Hume confronts the problem of determinism and libertarianism by claiming the conflict results from epistemological differences all men have ever agreed
More informationHow (not) to attack the luck argument
Philosophical Explorations Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2010, 157 166 How (not) to attack the luck argument E.J. Coffman Department of Philosophy, The University of Tennessee, 801 McClung Tower, Knoxville, 37996,
More informationCompatibilist Objections to Prepunishment
Florida Philosophical Review Volume X, Issue 1, Summer 2010 7 Compatibilist Objections to Prepunishment Winner of the Outstanding Graduate Paper Award at the 55 th Annual Meeting of the Florida Philosophical
More informationQuinn s DDE. 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases:
Quinn s DDE 1. Quinn s DDE: Warren Quinn begins by running through the familiar pairs of cases: Strategic Bomber vs. Terror Bomber Direction of Resources vs. Guinea Pigs Hysterectomy vs. Craniotomy What
More informationAGENT CAUSATION AND RESPONSIBILITY: A REPLY TO FLINT
AGENT CAUSATION AND RESPONSIBILITY: A REPLY TO FLINT Michael Bergmann In an earlier paper I argued that if we help ourselves to Molinism, we can give a counterexample - one avoiding the usual difficulties
More information