Statement of Research
|
|
- Austin Bates
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Statement of Research Amanda Bryant My central topic of research is the epistemology and methodology of metaphysics, particularly the relationship between metaphysics and science. My research on that topic asks: What relationship should metaphysics stand in to current science? Must good metaphysics be responsive to current science, and if so, how? In response to those questions, I develop and defend a program for the naturalization of metaphysics. Those interests have also lead me to pursue work on metaontology, scientific realism, and Quine. Naturalizing Metaphysics In their (2007) book Every Thing Must Go, James Ladyman and Don Ross famously railed against what they call neo-scholastic metaphysics. Their polemic has inspired much renewed interest in the epistemic and methodological credentials of the discipline of metaphysics, as well as in the prospect of reform. While I am sympathetic to their self-described scientism, I argue that Ladyman and Ross fail to show that science in particular, physics should be assigned epistemic supremacy. Further, their program of naturalization fails to sufficiently reflect the complex and pluralistic state of the current sciences. So there is much work to be done to articulate and motivate a sophisticated program for the naturalization of metaphysics. My main research contributes to that work. In my view, current metaphysical practice falls into one of two camps: free range or scientifically responsible. Free range metaphysics is constrained only by logical, aesthetic, and psychological demands, such as demands for consistency, simplicity, intuitive plausibility, and explanatory power. In my view, free range metaphysics cannot claim to produce justified theories of reality, because the constraints on its content are too weak and fail to secure epistemic warrant. By contrast, scientifically responsible metaphysics is conscientiously engaged with the theories and practices of the current sciences. I claim that scientifically responsible metaphysics is better constrained and supported than free range metaphysics, and therefore can better claim to produce justified metaphysical theories. I have produced three papers directly on this topic. The first levels my criticisms of free range metaphysics, considers some of its collateral benefits, and makes a normative conclusion for the discipline of metaphysics. The second articulates and defends an epistemology for naturalized modal metaphysics that takes current science as an evidence-base for the justification of modal claims and as a model of good modal reasoning. My account of naturalized modal metaphysics does not rely on dubious modal intuitions, allows for greater resolution of disagreement relative to rationalist accounts, and can better account for modal error. The third paper examines the naturalistic credentials of the grounding literature. It collects examples of work in the grounding literature that I take to be scientifically responsible (Audi 2012; Schaffer 2003, 2010, 2015) and synthesizes a number of recommendations for how theorists of grounding can fruitfully engage with science. Bryant Research Statement 1 of 6
2 In future research on this topic, I plan to attend in greater detail to the place of scientific practice in a naturalized metaphysics. I d like to flesh out and give specific examples of modes of metaphysical engagement with scientific practice, such as such as attending to the categories and conceptual frameworks that are used fruitfully in science (see for instance Ereshefsky 1991, 1994, 2001). I also plan to do some first-order metaphysics on modality and grounding to demonstrate what my conception of scientifically responsible metaphysics looks like concretely. Furthermore, while I make my program of naturalization sensitive to the possibility of scientific pluralism, I intend to investigate more fully what the truth of scientific pluralism would mean for naturalized metaphysics. In particular, I d like to consider whether scientific pluralism implies some kind of metaphysical pluralism, and what its features would be. I also plan to produce a book on the topic that will 1) situate my program for naturalizing metaphysics in relation to other such programs, 2) outline a number of desiderata for programs of naturalization, 3) show how my program satisfies the desiderata more fully than others, 4) lay out and defend my negative and positive claims, 5) deal with metaphysical topics that prima facie resist naturalization, and 6) perform some first-order, scientifically responsible metaphysics. Metaontology In relation to my interesest in the epistemology and methodology of metaphysics, some of my research investigates the theoretical legitimacy of ontological views that are permissive in the sense that they make the conditions for existence so weak that many or most putative things exist (see Ecklund 2006, 2009; Lewis 1986; Schaffer 2009; Williamson 2002). Prima facie, these permissive views violate a number of theory-governing norms, including norms favoring simplicity, empiricism, nominalism, and logical consistency. However, I argue that none of those apparent norm violations are egregious. Over the course of this research, I was struck by certain biologically motivated criticisms of Ockham s Razor (Wimsatt 1994) and other epistemic norms (Ereshefsky and Reydon 2015). In future research, I will examine the tenability of Ockham s Razor and other theorygoverning norms in certain scientific domains, and consider what the results mean for scientifically responsible metaphysics. Scientific Realism In addition to my research on the relation between science and metaphysics, some of my research concerns science itself scientific realism, in particular. If the epistemic credentials of naturalized metaphysics hang on the epistemic credentials of science, we need to know what those latter credentials are. In particular, if scientific realism turns out to be false or untenable, then it will be harder to motivate naturalization. On the subject of scientific realism, I have been gripped by recent work on the base-rate fallacy an error in probabilistic reasoning that threatens to fatally undermine the no miracles argument and the pessimistic meta-induction. In essence, the error is to ignore the prior probability (probability not conditional on any particular evidence) of the relevant hypothesis. The base-rate fallacy is disastrous to probabilistic reasoning. My paper on this subject Bryant Research Statement 2 of 6
3 rejects several realist defences of the no miracles argument (Psillos 2006; Worrall 2007, 2011, unpublished) against accusations that it commits the base-rate fallacy (Howson 2000, Lipton 2004, and Magnus and Callender 2004). The no miracles argument does, I argue, commit the base-rate fallacy and should be abandoned. In future research, I plan to consider the special motivations for naturalization that might emerge from an anti-realist point of view. Some advocates of naturalized metaphysics (French and Ladyman 2003; French 2014; Ladyman 1998; Ladyman and Ross 2007) argue that physics motivates a particular variety of realism: Ontic Structural Realism (OSR), according to which science acquaints us with the ontologically fundamental underlying structure of the world. Since science makes OSR a live theoretical option, I am interested in OSR s tenability. One of my papers considers whether versions of OSR that posit objectless ontologies can accommodate causation. Some critics (Busch 2003, Chakravartty 2003, Psillos 2009) argue that objectless structures don t have the sorts of properties (first-order properties) required to enable causal relations. I argue that taking structures to be concrete and understanding objects, properties, and events in structural terms allows us to square causation with OSR. The upshot is that advocates of OSR can comfortably appeal to causal explanations. I plan to continue my work on OSR. In particular, I would like to grapple with a thorny challenge facing the full articulation of OSR: what to make of relations. Quine Lastly, in relation to my work on naturalizing metaphysics, I have an interest in Quine s system of thought, particularly his epistemology its naturalism and holism and his resultant philosophy of logic. One of my papers (Bryant forthcoming) grapples with the tension in Quine s work regarding the rational revisability of logic. On the one hand, Quine s commitment to the universal revisability of the web of belief clearly commits him to the rational revisability of logic. On the other hand, the translation argument and the change of logic, change of subject argument appear to rule out successful discussion of alternate logical principles and it s not clear how revision can proceed if rival logics aren t communicable (see also Priest 2006, 2014; Resnik 2004). My paper articulates a Neo-Quinean view that preserves and brings into alignment the universal revisability thesis, translation argument, and change of logic, change of subject argument. On that view, everything is revisable in some manner or other it s just that the logical principles that laypersons find (actually or potentially) obvious and tacitly use to govern their everyday inferences can t be revised quickly and all at once. Since, in Quine s view, what most people find obvious resists change, changes to laymen s logic must be gradual. In my exploration of Quine s broader system of thought, I have been compelled by his holism, on the one hand, but unwilling to accept the radical epistemological and methodological naturalism it implies, on the other. That is, while I advocate for the naturalization of metaphysics, I don t reject a priori knowledge and justification out of hand, nor do I wish to advocate for the naturalization of all forms of inquiry. In future work, I wish to develop a strategy to avoid the slippery slope from Bryant Research Statement 3 of 6
4 epistemic holism to radical naturalism a way of accepting holism about justification, while adopting moderate, domain-specific forms of naturalism. Works Cited Audi, Paul A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding. In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder, Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Bryant, Amanda. forthcoming. Resolving Quine s Conflict: A Neo-Quinean View of the Rational Revisability of Logic. In Australasian Journal of Logic (Special Issue: Frontiers of Non- Classicality: Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy), edited by Zach Weber, Maarten McKubre- Jordens, and Patrick Girard. Busch, Jacob What Structures Could Not Be. International Studies in The Philosophy of Science 17: Chakravartty, Anjan The Structuralist Conception of Objects. Philosophy of Science 70: Ecklund, Matti Carnap and Ontological Pluralism. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by David Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, Oxford: Oxford UP Neo-Fregean Ontology. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (Metaphysics): Ereshefsky, Marc The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 61 (2): Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution. Philosophy of Science 58 (1): , and Thomas Reydon Scientific Kinds. Philosophical Studies 172 (4): French, Steven The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford UP. -, and James Ladyman Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure: A Reply to Cao. Synthese 136: Howson, Colin Hume s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Oxford UP. Ladyman, James What Is Structural Realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: Don Ross, David Spurrett, and John Collier Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford UP. Bryant Research Statement 4 of 6
5 Lewis, David Modal Realism at Work: Properties. In On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Blackwell. Lipton, Peter Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Magnus, P.D., and Craig Callender Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy. Philosophy of Science 71: Priest, Graham Revising Logic. In The Metaphysics of Logic, edited by Penelope Rush, Cambridge: Cambridge UP Logic and Revisability. In Doubt Truth to Be a Liar, Oxford: Oxford UP. Psillos, Stathis Is Structural Realism Possible? In Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation, Chippenham: Palgrave Macmillan Thinking About the Ultimate Argument for Realism. In Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave, edited by Colin Cheyne and John Worrall, New York: Springer. Resnik, Michael Revising Logic. In The Law of Non-Contradiction, edited by Graham Priest, J.C. Beall, and Bradley Armour-Garb, Oxford: Oxford UP. Schaffer, Jonathan Grounding in the Image of Causation. Philosophical Studies Online Monism: The Priority of the Whole. Philosophical Review 119 (1): On What Grounds What. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by David Manley, David Chalmers, and Ryan Wasserman, Oxford: Oxford UP Is There a Fundamental Level. Noûs 37 (3): Williamson, Timothy Necessary Existents. In Logic, Thought and Language: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51, edited by Anthony O Hear, Cambridge UP. Wimsatt, William The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (sup 1): Worrall, John. unpublished. Miracles, Pessimism, and Scientific Realism. PhilPapers. philpapers.org/ rec/wormpa The No Miracles Intuition and the No Miracles Argument. In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, Vol. 2, edited by Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, and Marcel Weber, New York: Springer. Bryant Research Statement 5 of 6
6 Miracles and Models: Why Reports of the Death of Structural Realism May Be Exaggerated. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (61): Bryant Research Statement 6 of 6
AMANDA BRYANT. Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center, CUNY 365 Fifth Ave., Rm New York, NY 10016
AMANDA BRYANT Philosophy Program, The Graduate Center, CUNY 365 Fifth Ave., Rm. 7113 New York, NY 10016 www.amandakbryant.com abryant@gradcenter.cuny.edu Education PhD in Philosophy (Expected Spring 2017),
More informationAMANDA BRYANT. Department of Philosophy Trent University 1600 West Bank Drive Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2
AMANDA BRYANT Department of Philosophy Trent University 1600 West Bank Drive Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2 www.amandakbryant.com amandabryant@trentu.ca Employment 2017-2018, Assistant Professor (Limited
More informationTuomas E. Tahko (University of Helsinki)
Meta-metaphysics Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, forthcoming in October 2018 Tuomas E. Tahko (University of Helsinki) tuomas.tahko@helsinki.fi www.ttahko.net Article Summary Meta-metaphysics concerns
More information3. Campos de conocimiento en los que podría ser anunciado (máximo dos):
Propuesta de curso o seminario 1. Nombre del profesor: Martin Glazier 2. Nombre del curso o seminario: Explanation and ground 3. Campos de conocimiento en los que podría ser anunciado (máximo dos): Metafísica
More information1 Why should you care about metametaphysics?
1 Why should you care about metametaphysics? This introductory chapter deals with the motivation for studying metametaphysics and its importance for metaphysics more generally. The relationship between
More informationPostmodal Metaphysics
Postmodal Metaphysics Ted Sider Structuralism seminar 1. Conceptual tools in metaphysics Tools of metaphysics : concepts for framing metaphysical issues. They structure metaphysical discourse. Problem
More informationGrounds and Structural Realism: A Possible Metaphysical Framework 1
Grounds and Structural Realism: A Possible Metaphysical Framework 1 Bianca-Alexandra Savu Abstract: This article discusses the proposal of accommodating grounding theories and structural realism, with
More informationA copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge
Leuenberger, Stephan (2014) Review of: Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder (eds), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Dialectica, 68 (1). pp. 147-151. ISSN 0012-2017 Copyright
More informationPH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning
DEREE COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR: PH 3118 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE (previously PH 2118) (Updated SPRING 2016) PREREQUISITES: CATALOG DESCRIPTION: RATIONALE: LEARNING OUTCOMES: METHOD OF TEACHING AND LEARNING: UK
More informationThe Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism
The Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism Peter Carmack Introduction Throughout the history of science, arguments have emerged about science s ability or non-ability
More informationLogical Realism and the Metaphysics of Logic Michaela McSweeney Draft please do not cite without permission
Logical Realism and the Metaphysics of Logic Michaela McSweeney Draft please do not cite without permission Abstract: Logical Realism is taken to mean many different things. I argue that if reality has
More informationIntro to Ground. 1. The idea of ground. 2. Relata. are facts): F 1. More-or-less equivalent phrases (where F 1. and F 2. depends upon F 2 F 2
Intro to Ground Ted Sider Ground seminar 1. The idea of ground This essay is a plea for ideological toleration. Philosophers are right to be fussy about the words they use, especially in metaphysics where
More informationUNITY OF KNOWLEDGE (IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY) Vol. I - Philosophical Holism M.Esfeld
PHILOSOPHICAL HOLISM M. Esfeld Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, Germany Keywords: atomism, confirmation, holism, inferential role semantics, meaning, monism, ontological dependence, rule-following,
More informationReview of Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science
Review of Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science Constructive Empiricism (CE) quickly became famous for its immunity from the most devastating criticisms that brought down
More informationAboutness and Justification
For a symposium on Imogen Dickie s book Fixing Reference to be published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Aboutness and Justification Dilip Ninan dilip.ninan@tufts.edu September 2016 Al believes
More informationMetametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009
Book Review Metametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009 Giulia Felappi giulia.felappi@sns.it Every discipline has its own instruments and studying them is
More informationNATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE
NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE NATURALISM a philosophical view according to which philosophy is not a distinct mode of inquiry with its own problems and its own special body of (possible) knowledge philosophy
More informationTheoretical Virtues in Science
manuscript, September 11, 2017 Samuel K. Schindler Theoretical Virtues in Science Uncovering Reality Through Theory Table of contents Table of Figures... iii Introduction... 1 1 Theoretical virtues, truth,
More informationQuine s Naturalized Epistemology, Epistemic Normativity and the. Gettier Problem
Quine s Naturalized Epistemology, Epistemic Normativity and the Gettier Problem Dr. Qilin Li (liqilin@gmail.com; liqilin@pku.edu.cn) The Department of Philosophy, Peking University Beiijing, P. R. China
More informationExplanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch s Analogy Alex Worsnip University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Explanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch s Analogy Alex Worsnip University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Forthcoming in Thought please cite published version In
More informationWorld without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.
Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and
More informationPhil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?
Phil 1103 Review Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science? 1. Copernican Revolution Students should be familiar with the basic historical facts of the Copernican revolution.
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationHow Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol , 19-27)
How Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol 3 1986, 19-27) John Collier Department of Philosophy Rice University November 21, 1986 Putnam's writings on realism(1) have
More informationIntro to Science Studies I
PHIL 209A / SOCG 255A / HIGR 238 / COGR 225A Intro to Science Studies I Fall 2017 Instructor: Kerry McKenzie kmckenzie@ucsd.edu Seminars: Tuesday 9.30-12.20pm, HSS 3027. O ce Hours: Wednesday 2-4pm, HSS
More informationPublished in Michal Peliš (ed.) The Logica Yearbook 2007 (Prague: Filosofia), pp , 2008.
The Metaphysical Status of Logic TUOMAS E. TAHKO (www.ttahko.net) Published in Michal Peliš (ed.) The Logica Yearbook 2007 (Prague: Filosofia), pp. 225-235, 2008. ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is
More informationAn Introduction to Metametaphysics
An Introduction to Metametaphysics How do we come to know metaphysical truths? How does metaphysical inquiry work? Are metaphysical debates substantial? These are the questions which characterize metametaphysics.
More informationTHE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE
Diametros nr 29 (wrzesień 2011): 80-92 THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE Karol Polcyn 1. PRELIMINARIES Chalmers articulates his argument in terms of two-dimensional
More informationStructural realism and metametaphysics
Structural realism and metametaphysics Ted Sider For Rutgers conference on Structural Realism and Metaphysics of Science, May 2017 Many structural realists have developed that theory in a relatively conservative
More informationAgainst the No-Miracle Response to Indispensability Arguments
Against the No-Miracle Response to Indispensability Arguments I. Overview One of the most influential of the contemporary arguments for the existence of abstract entities is the so-called Quine-Putnam
More informationReply to Kit Fine. Theodore Sider July 19, 2013
Reply to Kit Fine Theodore Sider July 19, 2013 Kit Fine s paper raises important and difficult issues about my approach to the metaphysics of fundamentality. In chapters 7 and 8 I examined certain subtle
More informationNB: Presentations will be assigned on the second week. Suggested essay topics will be distributed in May.
PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC Time and Place: Thursdays 14:15-15:45, 23.02/U1.61 Instructor: Dr. Ioannis Votsis E-mail: votsis@phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de Office hours (Room Geb. 23.21/04.86): Thursdays 11:00-12:00
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationSelf-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge
Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge Colorado State University BIBLID [0873-626X (2012) 33; pp. 459-467] Abstract According to rationalists about moral knowledge, some moral truths are knowable a
More informationIn Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Book Reviews 1 In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xiv + 232. H/b 37.50, $54.95, P/b 13.95,
More informationTuukka Kaidesoja Précis of Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology
Journal of Social Ontology 2015; 1(2): 321 326 Book Symposium Open Access Tuukka Kaidesoja Précis of Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology DOI 10.1515/jso-2015-0016 Abstract: This paper introduces
More informationThe Question of Metaphysics
The Question of Metaphysics metaphysics seriously. Second, I want to argue that the currently popular hands-off conception of metaphysical theorising is unable to provide a satisfactory answer to the question
More informationRethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View
http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319532363 Carlo Cellucci Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View 1 Preface From its very beginning, philosophy has been viewed as aimed at knowledge and methods to
More informationOutscoping and Discourse Threat
Outscoping and Discourse Threat Theodore Sider Inquiry 57 (2014): 413 26 Agustín Rayo s exciting and bold new book can be viewed as continuing Carnap s debate with Quine over analyticity and mathematical
More informationLuck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University
Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational Joshua Schechter Brown University I Introduction What is the epistemic significance of discovering that one of your beliefs depends
More informationDAVID MANLEY Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan 435 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI
DAVID MANLEY 435 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor of Philosophy, 2013-present Assistant Professor of Philosophy, 2009-13 Assistant Professor of Philosophy,
More informationIn Epistemic Relativism, Mark Kalderon defends a view that has become
Aporia vol. 24 no. 1 2014 Incoherence in Epistemic Relativism I. Introduction In Epistemic Relativism, Mark Kalderon defends a view that has become increasingly popular across various academic disciplines.
More informationReview of David J. Chalmers Constructing the World (OUP 2012) David Chalmers burst onto the philosophical scene in the mid-1990s with his work on
Review of David J. Chalmers Constructing the World (OUP 2012) Thomas W. Polger, University of Cincinnati 1. Introduction David Chalmers burst onto the philosophical scene in the mid-1990s with his work
More informationConditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge Gracia's proposal
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2016 Mar 12th, 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM Conditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationIssue 4, Special Conference Proceedings Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society
Issue 4, Special Conference Proceedings 2017 Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society An Alternative Approach to Mathematical Ontology Amber Donovan (Durham University) Introduction
More informationTruth and Realism. EDITED BY PATRICK GREENOUGH AND MICHAEL P. LYNCH. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Pp. ix Price h/b, p/b.
Truth and Realism. EDITED BY PATRICK GREENOUGH AND MICHAEL P. LYNCH. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Pp. ix + 253. Price 45.00 h/b, 18.99 p/b.) This book collects papers presented at a conference of the
More informationNATURALISM IN EPISTEMOLOGY AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW
Law and Philosophy (2011) 30:419 451 Ó Springer 2011 DOI 10.1007/s10982-011-9109-y NATURALISM IN EPISTEMOLOGY AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF LAW (Accepted 23 May 2011) ABSTRACT. In this paper, I challenge an influential
More informationCritical Scientific Realism
Book Reviews 1 Critical Scientific Realism, by Ilkka Niiniluoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. xi + 341. H/b 40.00. Right from the outset, Critical Scientific Realism distinguishes the critical
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction
Philosophy 5340 - Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction In the section entitled Sceptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding
More informationON CAUSAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE MODELLING OF BELIEF CHANGE
ON CAUSAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE MODELLING OF BELIEF CHANGE A. V. RAVISHANKAR SARMA Our life in various phases can be construed as involving continuous belief revision activity with a bundle of accepted beliefs,
More informationReason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,
Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 208. Price 60.) In this interesting book, Ted Poston delivers an original and
More informationWhat does it mean if we assume the world is in principle intelligible?
REASONS AND CAUSES The issue The classic distinction, or at least the one we are familiar with from empiricism is that causes are in the world and reasons are some sort of mental or conceptual thing. I
More informationPhilosophy Courses in English
FACOLTÀ DI STUDI UMANISTICI DIPARTIMENTO DI FILOSOFIA Philosophy Courses in English - 2014-2015 During the Academic Year 2014-2015, the Department of Philosophy offers the following five courses in English:
More informationClass 6 - Scientific Method
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus I. Holism, Reflective Equilibrium, and Science Class 6 - Scientific Method Our course is centrally concerned with
More informationIntroduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism
Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism Felix Pinkert 103 Ethics: Metaethics, University of Oxford, Hilary Term 2015 Cognitivism, Non-cognitivism, and the Humean Argument
More informationTHEORY AND ANTI-THEORY IN ETHICS. A Two-Day Workshop on Philosophy and the Nature of Morality
THEORY AND ANTI-THEORY IN ETHICS A Two-Day Workshop on Philosophy and the Nature of Morality Hosted by Flinders University of South Australia Monday 15 and Tuesday 16 April 2013 It is widely assumed by
More informationPhilosophica 67 (2001, 1) pp. 5-9 INTRODUCTION
Philosophica 67 (2001, 1) pp. 5-9 INTRODUCTION Part of the tasks analytical philosophers set themselves is a critical assessment of the metaphysics of sciences. Three levels (or domains or perspectives)
More informationAssistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, UC San Diego.
KERRY M C KENZIE Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, UC San Diego. www.kerrymckenzie.org kmckenzie@ucsd.edu COMPETENCES Areas of Specialization: Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Physics.
More informationPh.D. Philosophy, Princeton University 2007 Colgate University 2001, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, High Honors in Philosophy
PAUL AUDI Department of Philosophy University of Rochester Box 270078 Rochester, NY 14627-0078 paul.audi@rochester.edu http://www.paulaudi.net Education Ph.D. Philosophy, Princeton University 2007 B.A.
More informationHorwich and the Liar
Horwich and the Liar Sergi Oms Sardans Logos, University of Barcelona 1 Horwich defends an epistemic account of vagueness according to which vague predicates have sharp boundaries which we are not capable
More informationMY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A
I Holistic Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Culture MY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A philosophical discussion of the main elements of civilization or culture such as science, law, religion, politics,
More informationNaturalized Epistemology. 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? Quine PY4613
Naturalized Epistemology Quine PY4613 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? a. How is it motivated? b. What are its doctrines? c. Naturalized Epistemology in the context of Quine s philosophy 2. Naturalized
More informationA Logical Approach to Metametaphysics
A Logical Approach to Metametaphysics Daniel Durante Departamento de Filosofia UFRN durante10@gmail.com 3º Filomena - 2017 What we take as true commits us. Quine took advantage of this fact to introduce
More informationThe linguistic-cultural nature of scientific truth 1
The linguistic-cultural nature of scientific truth 1 Damián Islas Mondragón Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango México Abstract While we typically think of culture as defined by geography or ethnicity
More informationAre the Questions of Metaphysics More Fundamental Than Those of Science? Alyssa Ney. Draft of November 1, 2017
Are the Questions of Metaphysics More Fundamental Than Those of Science? Alyssa Ney Draft of November 1, 2017 The project of naturalistic metaphysics appears straightforward. Start with one s best scientific
More informationRussell on Metaphysical Vagueness
Russell on Metaphysical Vagueness Mark Colyvan Abstract Recently a fascinating debate has been rekindled over whether vagueness is metaphysical or linguistic. That is, is vagueness an objective feature
More informationMORAL FIXED POINTS AND CONCEPTUAL DEFICIENCY: REPLY TO INGRAM (2015)
DISCUSSION NOTE MORAL FIXED POINTS AND CONCEPTUAL DEFICIENCY: REPLY TO INGRAM (2015) BY CHRISTOS KYRIACOU JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE MARCH 2017 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT CHRISTOS
More informationAll philosophical debates not due to ignorance of base truths or our imperfect rationality are indeterminate.
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 11: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Chapters 6-7, Twelfth Excursus) Chapter 6 6.1 * This chapter is about the
More information6AANA026 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2015/16
6AANA026 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2015/16 Basic information Credits: 20 Module Tutor: Sherrilyn Roush Office: 610 Philosophy Building Consultation time: Tuesday 11-12:00, Wednesday
More informationThe New Puzzle of Moral Deference. moral belief solely on the basis of a moral expert s testimony. The fact that this deference is
The New Puzzle of Moral Deference Many philosophers think that there is something troubling about moral deference, i.e., forming a moral belief solely on the basis of a moral expert s testimony. The fact
More informationAn Introduction to Metametaphysics
An Introduction to Metametaphysics How do we come to know metaphysical truths? How does metaphysical inquiry work? Are metaphysical debates substantial? These are the questions which characterize metametaphysics.
More informationIs There a Priori Knowledge?
Chapter Eight Is There a Priori Knowledge? For advocates of a priori knowledge, the chief task is to explain how such knowledge comes about. According to Laurence BonJour, we acquire a priori knowledge
More informationCausation and Structural Realism
Papers Causation and Structural Realism Martin Schmidt Abstract: M. Esfeld has recently argued that ontic structural realism may succeed only if it is based on causal structures. In order to meet this
More informationList of Courses Taught 2. Possible Course Offerings 3. Evidence of Teaching Quality 4. Teaching Referees 9. Sample Syllabi 10
TEACHING DOSSIER KERRY MCKENZIE CONTENTS List of Courses Taught 2 Possible Course Offerings 3 Evidence of Teaching Quality 4 Teaching Referees 9 Sample Syllabi 10 1. Physics and the Metaphysics of Fundamentality
More informationQualified Realism: From Constructive Empiricism to Metaphysical Realism.
This paper aims first to explicate van Fraassen s constructive empiricism, which presents itself as an attractive species of scientific anti-realism motivated by a commitment to empiricism. However, the
More informationREVIEW THE DOOR TO SELLARS
Metascience (2007) 16:555 559 Ó Springer 2007 DOI 10.1007/s11016-007-9141-6 REVIEW THE DOOR TO SELLARS Willem A. de Vries, Wilfrid Sellars. Chesham: Acumen, 2005. Pp. xiv + 338. 16.99 PB. By Andreas Karitzis
More informationRealism and the success of science argument. Leplin:
Realism and the success of science argument Leplin: 1) Realism is the default position. 2) The arguments for anti-realism are indecisive. In particular, antirealism offers no serious rival to realism in
More informationHow Successful Is Naturalism?
How Successful Is Naturalism? University of Notre Dame T he question raised by this volume is How successful is naturalism? The question presupposes that we already know what naturalism is and what counts
More informationAgainst Monism. 1. Monism and pluralism. Theodore Sider
Against Monism Theodore Sider Analysis 67 (2007): 1 7. Final version at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/ toc/anal/67/293 Abstract Jonathan Schaffer distinguishes two sorts of monism. Existence monists
More informationStructural Realism or Modal Empiricism?
Structural Realism or Modal Empiricism? Abstract Structural realism has been suggested as the best compromise in the debate on scientific realism. It proposes that we should be realist about the relational
More informationPLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
This article was downloaded by: [Psillos, Stathis] On: 18 August 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 913836605] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered
More informationRealism and Idealism Internal realism
Realism and Idealism Internal realism Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 12/11/15 Easy answers Last week, we considered the metaontological debate between Quine and Carnap. Quine
More informationThe problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
More informationIntuition as Philosophical Evidence
Essays in Philosophy Volume 13 Issue 1 Philosophical Methodology Article 17 January 2012 Intuition as Philosophical Evidence Federico Mathías Pailos University of Buenos Aires Follow this and additional
More informationTHE CURRENT STATE OF THE METAPHYSICS OF SCIENCE DEBATE
Philosophica 90 (2015) pp.23-60 THE CURRENT STATE OF THE METAPHYSICS OF SCIENCE DEBATE Cristian Soto ABSTRACT I examine the current state of the debate on the metaphysics of science (MS for short). In
More informationPARTS GROUND THE WHOLE AND ARE IDENTICAL TO IT Roberto Loss
PARTS GROUND THE WHOLE AND ARE IDENTICAL TO IT Roberto Loss Forthcoming in the Australasian Journal of Philosophy Penultimate draft Please refer to the published version http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00048402.2015.1119864
More informationEpistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference?
Res Cogitans Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 3 6-7-2012 Epistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference? Jason Poettcker University of Victoria Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Scientific realism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science A statement of scientific realism Characterization (Scientific realism) Science aims to give
More informationThe Philosophy of Logic
The Philosophy of Logic PHL 430-001 Spring 2003 MW: 10:20-11:40 EBH, Rm. 114 Instructor Information Matthew McKeon Office: 503 South Kedzie/Rm. 507 Office hours: Friday--10:30-1:00, and by appt. Telephone:
More informationIntro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
More informationGrounding and Analyticity. David Chalmers
Grounding and Analyticity David Chalmers Interlevel Metaphysics Interlevel metaphysics: how the macro relates to the micro how nonfundamental levels relate to fundamental levels Grounding Triumphalism
More informationA Scientific Realism-Based Probabilistic Approach to Popper's Problem of Confirmation
A Scientific Realism-Based Probabilistic Approach to Popper's Problem of Confirmation Akinobu Harada ABSTRACT From the start of Popper s presentation of the problem about the way for confirmation of a
More informationPhilosophy 125 Day 1: Overview
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Philosophy 125 Day 1: Overview Welcome! Are you in the right place? PHIL 125 (Metaphysics) Overview of Today s Class 1. Us: Branden (Professor), Vanessa & Josh
More informationFrom the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
From the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Epistemology Peter D. Klein Philosophical Concept Epistemology is one of the core areas of philosophy. It is concerned with the nature, sources and limits
More informationPsillos s Defense of Scientific Realism
Luke Rinne 4/27/04 Psillos and Laudan Psillos s Defense of Scientific Realism In this paper, Psillos defends the IBE based no miracle argument (NMA) for scientific realism against two main objections,
More informationWhat Matters in (Naturalized) Metaphysics?
Essays in Philosophy Volume 13 Issue 1 Philosophical Methodology Article 13 January 2012 What Matters in (Naturalized) Metaphysics? Sophie R. Allen University of Oxford, UK Follow this and additional works
More informationScientific realism and anti-realism
Scientific realism and anti-realism Philosophy of Science (106a/124), Topic 6, 14 November 2017 Adam Caulton (adam.caulton@philosophy.ox.ac.uk) 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Five species of realism Metaphysical
More information*Please note that tutorial times and venues will be organised independently with your teaching tutor.
4AANA004 METAPHYSICS Syllabus Academic year 2016/17. Basic information Credits: 15 Module tutor: Jessica Leech Office: 707 Consultation time: Monday 1-2, Wednesday 11-12. Semester: 2 Lecture time and venue*:
More informationHistorical Inductions, Unconceived Alternatives, and Unconceived Objections
Historical Inductions, Unconceived Alternatives, and Unconceived Objections Moti Mizrahi motimizra@gmail.com Forthcoming in Journal for General Philosophy of Science Abstract: In this paper, I outline
More information