Academic Writing and Logical Thinking
|
|
|
- Julianna Clark
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NAGOYA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WORKSHOPS 2016 Academic Writing and Logical Thinking May 18 ~ June 15, 2016 Instructor: Dr. Paul Lai
2 NAGOYA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WORKSHOPS 2016 Review
3 All academic writers are required to know The Writing Requirement How words can be properly arranged to express the ideas. The Thinking Requirement How ideas can be properly arranged so that they can be properly expressed through words in a clear & convincing manner.
4 Being Clear Having a Truth Condition One Sentence Thesis Statement Minimum Lexical & Structural Ambiguity Non-Compound Sentence Structure 4
5 Thesis Statement Support 1 Support 2 Support 3
6
7 (Homework) (i) Think about a paper that you are planning to write. (ii) Develop a thesis s t a t e m e n t f o r t h e paper. (iii) Presenting your thesis statement on June 15.
8 Try to make the following reason convincing: Peter cannot submit the assignment on Monday because his computer broke down on Saturday.
9 How to use logic practically
10 What is logic?
11 An Instrument for Acquiring Knowledge
12 Logic is the organon, or instrument of thought, which is specifically used for acquiring knowledge. According to Aristotle, we would not come to know anything without logic BC
13 KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION When you see many people inside a subway station wearing a wet raincoat or carrying a wet umbrella, what can you tell? It must be raining outside.
14 KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION INFERENTIAL RELATION Wet raincoats Rain outside
15 What is inference?
16 INFERENTIAL RELATION Statement 1 True Statement 2 True e.g. If Peter is in Tokyo, then Peter is in Japan.
17 INFERENTIAL RELATION Statement 1 False Statement 2 False e.g. If Peter is not in Japan, then Peter is not in Tokyo.
18 The truth/falsity of statement 1 affects the truth/falsity of statement 2
19 Some examples of logical inferences All people who live in Yada Residence are teachers. No one who lives in Yada Residence is not a teacher. Teacher Yada Residence
20 Some examples of logical inferences Some people who live in Yada Residence are teachers. Some people who live in Yada Residence are not teachers. Teacher Yada Residence
21 Some examples of logical inferences No men are angels. No angels are men. Men Angels
22 Some examples of logical inferences All dogs are animals. All animals are dogs. Animals Dogs
23 Some examples of logical inferences All human beings are animals. Peter is an animal. Animals Peter Human beings
24 Some examples of logical inferences All human beings are animals. Peter is a human being. Peter is an animal. Animals Peter Human beings
25 Understanding how to make logical inference is vital for understanding logic
26 Exercises on logical inference 1
27 Logical Inference Premise Conclusion Part A of the exercises is designed to train you how to make a proper inference based on a premise.
28 Each one of the exercises comes with (i) one statement corresponding to a factual event, and (ii) four inference choices that follow from (i). Although more than one of the four choices might be logical, you need to find out the one that is most likely / certainly true following from the truth of (i). e.g. England Ex-1. Paul is in London. London (a) Paul is on a business trip. (b) Paul will not come back to Japan for a while. (c) Paul is in England. (d) Paul likes London.
29 Exercises on logical inference 2
30 Logical Inference Conclusion Premise Part B is designed to train you how to find the proper premise for a conclusion.
31 Each one of the exercises comes with one conclusion and four premises. Find out the premise without which the conclusion is most certainly false. Note that your consideration is restricted to the four possible premises only, and you are supposed to choose, among the four, the one that provides the necessary support for the conclusion. Further note that additional premise or premises may be needed in order to make the conclusion true.
32 Fun Exercise!! Solving Logical Puzzles
33 Puzzle 1: Who is doing what?
34 Alonzo, Kurt, Rudolf, and Willard are four creative artists of great talent. One is a dancer, one is a painter, one is a singer, and one is a writer, though not necessarily in that order. (1) Alonzo and Rudolf were in the audience the night the singer made his debut on the concert stage. (2) Both Kurt and the writer have had their portraits painted from life by the painter. (3) The writer, whose biography of Willard was a best-seller, is planning to write a biography of Alonzo. (4) Alonzo has never heard of Rudolf. What is each man s artistic field?
35 Thank you very much!
36
Academic Writing and Logical Thinking
NAGOYA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WORKSHOPS 2017 Academic Writing and Logical Thinking May 17 ~ June 14, 2017 Instructor: Dr. Paul Lai NAGOYA UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WORKSHOPS 2016 Review Being Clear Having a Truth
What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing
What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing Logical relations Deductive logic Claims to provide conclusive support for the truth of a conclusion Inductive
Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5
Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations
Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic
Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 Propositions A proposition is a statement that can be true or false. Propositions are sometimes called
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN HTTP://MSTEENHAGEN.GITHUB.IO/TEACHING/2018TOM THE EINSTEIN-BERGSON DEBATE SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein met on the 6th of
INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY
INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY HOW DO I TELL IF AN AUTHOR IS ARGUING DEDUCTIVELY OR INDUCTIVELY? In both case, a question or problem must be
Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Introduction to Logic Instructor: Jason Sheley In this section we will learn: What is the difference between Deduction and Induction? Why use different types of logic? What is a valid argument? Invalid?
The Argumentative Essay
The Argumentative Essay Features of an argument Organized around convincing someone else that the claim is true Using evidence (grounds), warrants (reasons), and backing to support your claim We argue
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam
24.241 Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam You may not use any notes, handouts, or other material during the exam. All cell phones must be turned off. Please read all instructions carefully. Good luck with the
Critical Thinking is:
Logic: Day 1 Critical Thinking is: Thinking clearly and following rules of logic and rationality It s not being argumentative just for the sake of arguing Academics disagree about which departments do
Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011
Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church http://www.fbcweb.org/doctrines.html September 8, 2011 Building Mental Muscle & Growing the Mind through Logic Exercises: Lesson 4a The Three Acts of the
Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness
Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness 1 Goals Today Introduce one of our central topics: validity and soundness, and its connection to one of our primary course goals, namely: learning how to evaluate arguments
Instructor s Manual 1
Instructor s Manual 1 PREFACE This instructor s manual will help instructors prepare to teach logic using the 14th edition of Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, and Kenneth McMahon s Introduction to Logic. The
HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT
What does it mean to provide an argument for a statement? To provide an argument for a statement is an activity we carry out both in our everyday lives and within the sciences. We provide arguments for
Ancient Greek Philosophy. Instructor: Dr. Jason Sheley
Ancient Greek Philosophy Instructor: Dr. Jason Sheley Aristotle on the Psyche Aristotle s theory of the soul is notoriously difficult to classify. Scholars have attempted to frame Aristotle s theory as
HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106
Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models English 106 The Toulmin Model Developed by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in the 1950 s Emphasizes that logic often based on probability
Predicate logic. Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) Madrid Spain
Predicate logic Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) 28040 Madrid Spain Synonyms. First-order logic. Question 1. Describe this discipline/sub-discipline, and some of its more
2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions
National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only
Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)
Yimei Xiang yxiang@fas.harvard.edu 17 September 2013 1 What is negation? Negation in two-valued propositional logic Based on your understanding, select out the metaphors that best describe the meaning
Lecturer: Xavier Parent. Imperative logic and its problems. by Joerg Hansen. Imperative logic and its problems 1 / 16
Lecturer: Xavier Parent by Joerg Hansen 1 / 16 Topic of the lecture Handbook chapter ", by J. Hansen Imperative logic close to deontic logic, albeit different Complements the big historical chapter in
The Secret of Building a Logical Argument
The Secret of Building a Logical Argument Wai Ling Lai Nagoya University At Mei-Writing we advocate a writing approach for research papers that begins with a preliminary thesis statement. The entire process
Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic
Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,
Introducing Our New Faculty
Dr. Isidoro Talavera Franklin University, Philosophy Ph.D. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - Vanderbilt University M.A. in Philosophy - University of Missouri M.S.E. in Math Education
I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook.
Hello once again! Essay Assignment 1 I would like to give you some suggestions now that should help you as you are working on Essay Assignment 1. This presentation is somewhat long, but the information
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider
Reductio ad Absurdum, Modulation, and Logical Forms. Miguel López-Astorga 1
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology June 25, Vol. 3, No., pp. 59-65 ISSN: 2333-575 (Print), 2333-5769 (Online) Copyright The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research
Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic)
Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic) There's no easy way to say this, the material you're about to learn in this chapter can be pretty hard for some students. Other students, on the other
Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.
Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to
Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.
Announcements CS311H: Discrete Mathematics First Order Logic, Rules of Inference Instructor: Işıl Dillig Homework 1 is due now! Homework 2 is handed out today Homework 2 is due next Wednesday Instructor:
Knowledge. Internalism and Externalism
Knowledge Internalism and Externalism What is Knowledge? Uncontroversially: Knowledge implies truth S knows that it s Monday > it s Monday Almost as uncontroversially: Knowledge is a kind of belief S knows
The Unity of Reasoning?
3 The Unity of Reasoning? JOHN BROOME 1. Introduction In Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical (chapter 2 ofthis volume), Michael Bratman raises an objection against an account of practical reasoning
the aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 8: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Introduction, Chapters 1-2) Introduction * We are introduced to the ideas
Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)
Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques
Reasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.
Reasoning SYLLOGISM RULES FOR DERIVING CONCLUSIONS 1. The Conclusion does not contain the Middle Term (M). Premises : All spoons are plates. Some spoons are cups. Invalid Conclusion : All spoons are cups.
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES
SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES By james CAIN ETER Geach's views of relative identity, together with his Paccount of proper names and quantifiers, 1 while presenting what I believe
HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Critical Thinking - Wk 3 Instructor: Jason Sheley Quick Quiz Give an example of a statement. Give an example of sentence that is not a statement. Give an example of an argument Validity, Truth, Soundness,
2.1 Review. 2.2 Inference and justifications
Applied Logic Lecture 2: Evidence Semantics for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Formal logic and evidence CS 4860 Fall 2012 Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2.1 Review The purpose of logic is to make reasoning
PRACTICAL REASONING. Bart Streumer
PRACTICAL REASONING Bart Streumer b.streumer@rug.nl In Timothy O Connor and Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action Published version available here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444323528.ch31
FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS
FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR READERS INFLUENCES HOW YOU SEE A PARTICULAR SITUATION DEFINE AN ISSUE EXPLAIN THE ONGOING
HAVE WE REASON TO DO AS RATIONALITY REQUIRES? A COMMENT ON RAZ
HAVE WE REASON TO DO AS RATIONALITY REQUIRES? A COMMENT ON RAZ BY JOHN BROOME JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY SYMPOSIUM I DECEMBER 2005 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT JOHN BROOME 2005 HAVE WE REASON
Beyond Symbolic Logic
Beyond Symbolic Logic 1. The Problem of Incompleteness: Many believe that mathematics can explain *everything*. Gottlob Frege proposed that ALL truths can be captured in terms of mathematical entities;
Metaphysical Language, Ordinary Language and Peter van Inwagen s Material Beings *
Commentary Metaphysical Language, Ordinary Language and Peter van Inwagen s Material Beings * Peter van Inwagen Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1990 Daniel Nolan** daniel.nolan@nottingham.ac.uk Material
Drafting a Thesis Statement
Drafting a Thesis Statement A thesis statement or thesis states the main idea of an essay. For these two courses, it is important to remember that often your thesis statements will need to express an educated
Church-Turing Thesis
Church-Turing Thesis Juri Seelmann Fakultät für Informatik University of Innsbruck 6. Juni 2013 This document gives in the rst two chapters a short view into the live of Alan Turing and Alonzo Church.
Overview: Application: What to Avoid:
UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,
Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion
398 Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Volume 38, Number 3, Summer 1997 Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion S. V. BHAVE Abstract Disjunctive Syllogism,
To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.
LOGIC GUIDE 2 To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form. LOGICAL FORM The logical form of a statement or argument is the skeleton, or structure. If you retain only the words
HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13
1 HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Argument Recognition 2 II. Argument Analysis 3 1. Identify Important Ideas 3 2. Identify Argumentative Role of These Ideas 4 3. Identify Inferences 5 4. Reconstruct the
Russell: On Denoting
Russell: On Denoting DENOTING PHRASES Russell includes all kinds of quantified subject phrases ( a man, every man, some man etc.) but his main interest is in definite descriptions: the present King of
Proofs of Non-existence
The Problem of Evil Proofs of Non-existence Proofs of non-existence are strange; strange enough in fact that some have claimed that they cannot be done. One problem is with even stating non-existence claims:
Toulmin Model-Claims, Warrant, and Qualifiers
Toulmin Model-Claims, Warrant, and Qualifiers Objective: By the end of this lesson, students will be able to define the claims, warrant, and qualifiers in the Toulmin Model and apply these to argumentative
Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance).
Brainstorm for Persuasive Essay with counterargument TOPIC OR PROBLEM: What do you want the reader to believe? Start here: COUNTERARGUMENT: Why might someone disagree with you? SOLUTION OR COMPROMISE:
A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic
A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic Sungwoo Park Pohang University of Science and Technology South Korea Estonian Theory Days Jan 30, 2009 Outline Study of logic Model theory vs Proof theory Classical
Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning
Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning Gilbert Harman, Princeton University June 30, 2006 Jason Stanley s Knowledge and Practical Interests is a brilliant book, combining insights
Lecture 4. Before beginning the present lecture, I should give the solution to the homework problem
1 Lecture 4 Before beginning the present lecture, I should give the solution to the homework problem posed in the last lecture: how, within the framework of coordinated content, might we define the notion
Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 8 Jun 3rd, 9:00 AM - Jun 6th, 5:00 PM Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent Andrei Moldovan
The Extended Mind. But, what if the mind is like that? That is, what if the mind extends beyond the brain?
The Extended Mind 1. The Extended Body: We often have no problem accepting that the body can be augmented or extended in certain ways. For instance, it is not so far-fetched to think of someone s prosthetic
Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting.
Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting. My e-mail: cathalwoods at gmail dot com. Contact for a copy of my logic book, or go to
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic Name Period Date Symbolic notation: 1. Define the following symbols. a b ~ c d e g a b c d a b c d 2. Consider the following legend: Let p = You love bananas. Let
A Problem for a Direct-Reference Theory of Belief Reports. Stephen Schiffer New York University
A Problem for a Direct-Reference Theory of Belief Reports Stephen Schiffer New York University The direct-reference theory of belief reports to which I allude is the one held by such theorists as Nathan
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your
Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism
Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning................... 3 1.1.1 Strong Syllogism......................... 3 1.1.2 Weak Syllogism.......................... 4 1.1.3 Transitivity
Circularity in ethotic structures
Synthese (2013) 190:3185 3207 DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0135-6 Circularity in ethotic structures Katarzyna Budzynska Received: 28 August 2011 / Accepted: 6 June 2012 / Published online: 24 June 2012 The Author(s)
Sample Questions with Explanations for LSAT India
Five Sample Logical Reasoning Questions and Explanations Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one
SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
Exam Name SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of
The Problem of the External World
The Problem of the External World External World Skepticism Consider this painting by Rene Magritte: Is there a tree outside? External World Skepticism Many people have thought that humans are like this
356 THE MONIST all Cretans were liars. It can be put more simply in the form: if a man makes the statement I am lying, is he lying or not? If he is, t
356 THE MONIST all Cretans were liars. It can be put more simply in the form: if a man makes the statement I am lying, is he lying or not? If he is, that is what he said he was doing, so he is speaking
Millian responses to Frege s puzzle
Millian responses to Frege s puzzle phil 93914 Jeff Speaks February 28, 2008 1 Two kinds of Millian................................. 1 2 Conciliatory Millianism............................... 2 2.1 Hidden
UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016
Logical Consequence UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Intuitive characterizations of consequence Modal: It is necessary (or apriori) that, if the premises are true, the conclusion
LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010
LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010 LIBERALLY EDUCATED PEOPLE......RESPECT RIGOR NOT SO MUCH FOR ITS OWN SAKE BUT AS A WAY OF SEEKING TRUTH. LOGIC PUZZLE COOPER IS MURDERED. 3 SUSPECTS: SMITH, JONES,
A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
ELA CCSS Grade Five. Fifth Grade Reading Standards for Literature (RL)
Common Core State s English Language Arts ELA CCSS Grade Five Title of Textbook : Shurley English Level 5 Student Textbook Publisher Name: Shurley Instructional Materials, Inc. Date of Copyright: 2013
Review of Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics by Thomas Hofweber Billy Dunaway University of Missouri St Louis
Review of Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics by Thomas Hofweber Billy Dunaway University of Missouri St Louis Are there are numbers, propositions, or properties? These are questions that are traditionally
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method
Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method Professor Tim Mazzarol UWA Business School MGMT6791 UWA Business School DBA Program tim.mazzarol@uwa.edu.au
Introduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy PHIL 2000--Call # 41480 Kent Baldner Teaching Assistant: Mitchell Winget Discussion sections ( Labs ) meet on Wednesdays, starting next Wednesday, Sept. 5 th. 10:00-10:50, 1115
Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B
Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B The Applied Writing Assignment aims to achieve several of the substantive and generic learning outcomes posited for Constitutional
The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent
Critical Thinking Lecture Four October 5, 2012 Chapter 3 Deductive Argument Patterns Diagramming Arguments Deductive Argument Patterns - There are some common patterns shared by many deductive arguments
CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS
Fall 2001 ENGLISH 20 Professor Tanaka CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS In this first handout, I would like to simply give you the basic outlines of our critical thinking model
Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading
Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Developed by Jamie A. Hughes, South Campus Learning Center, Communications Lab 04-25-05 Permission to copy and use is granted to all FCCJ staff provided this
Lecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability
Lecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Two concepts of probability Example 1 You know that a coin is either two-headed or two-tailed but you have no information
A Short Course in Logic Example 3
A Short Course in Logic Example 3 I) Recognizing Arguments III) Evaluating Arguments II) Analyzing Arguments Bad Argument: Bad Inference Identifying the Parts of the Argument Premises Inferences Diagramming
An Interview with Jaakko Hintikka
1) The new biogenetic researches, for example cloning, present once again the ticklish question of the relationship between science and ethics. What is your opinion about this? And what part, do you think,
Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and
1 Internalism and externalism about justification Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and externalist. Internalist theories of justification say that whatever
PHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning
PHIL / PSYC 351 Thinking and Reasoning The Instructors My name is Jonathan Livengood. I am an assistant professor of philosophy. My primary area of specialization is philosophy of science. Jonathan Livengood
The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it!
MPS Chap. 16 The Strategy of Persuasion The focus of persuasion is not on the source, the message, or the receiver, but on all of them equally. They all cooperate to make a persuasive process. The idea
Analyzing Claims in The Fear of Change and Every Man A King
Analyzing Claims in The Fear of Change and Every Man A King Part I: The Fear of Change from The Ford Ideals by Henry Ford I. As you read The Fear of Change, make the following annotations: a. Mark claims
by Joshua E. Hummer, Esq. and Dr. Jill A. Hummer, Ph.D. Workbook
by Joshua E. Hummer, Esq. and Dr. Jill A. Hummer, Ph.D. Workbook 2 Persuasive Writing and Classical Rhetoric Table of Contents Lesson 1: Persuasive Writing and Classical Rhetoric... 4 Lesson 2: The Habits
Indian Philosophy Prof. Satya Sundar Sethy Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Indian Philosophy Prof. Satya Sundar Sethy Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module No. # 05 Lecture No. # 20 The Nyaya Philosophy Hi, today we will be
Aristotle ( ) His scientific thinking, his physics.
Aristotle (384-322) His scientific thinking, his physics. Aristotle: short biography Aristotle was a Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander the Great. He wrote on many different
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION Stewart COHEN ABSTRACT: James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call basic justification
Russell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
Exercises. Exercise 1: Hello, world. Exercise 2: Signatures and fields. C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies. Who owns the mule?
Exercises C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies This document contains some hands-on exercises for the Alloy tutorial. Some of these are adapted from other sources (listed at the bottom of the
Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point
Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or
THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
Writing the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay
Writing the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay To begin an argumentative/persuasive essay, you must first have an opinion you want others to share. RESEARCH To be valid, an opinion or point of view must be