The Mystery of Free Will
|
|
- Edward Dean
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Mystery of Free Will
2 What s the mystery exactly?
3 We all think that we have this power called free will... that we have the ability to make our own choices and create our own destiny
4 We think that we do what we want to do... that we have a host of legitimate options... that we make choices based upon those options... that we re in control of our own future
5 In other words, we all think the future is open and undetermined, like a garden of forking paths in front of us
6 When we deliberate we think we are actually trying to decide which possible future is the one that we want to make actual
7 But is the future really open and undetermined in this sense?
8 Many scientists believe that the universe is deterministic (or mechanistic) in the sense that everything that happens in the universe operates in accordance with a very structured set of natural laws
9 Determinism is the theory that the state of the universe at any point in time is entirely fixed by the state of the universe at a prior time and the laws of nature
10 The laws of nature refer to the various principles/forces/ powers which govern the natural phenomena of the world
11 For instance, no object having mass is accelerated beyond the speed of light
12 The idea of determinism
13 All events, even those which on account of their insignificance do not seem to follow the great laws of nature, are a result of it just as necessarily as the revolutions of the sun [As such], we ought to regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its antecedent state and as the cause of the one which is to follow...
14 The way the world was 1 second ago + = The laws of nature The way the world is right now
15 How exactly is determinism a threat to free will?
16 If the universe is deterministic, then the future is determined by the conjunction of the past and the laws of nature, which means that the future is NOT open and undetermined
17 If determinism is true, then only one future is genuinely open to us and all other futures are merely illusions X X
18
19 What do we mean when we say free will exactly?
20 According to Hume, the question of the nature of free will is the most contentious question of metaphysics...
21 A few different ways of understanding free will Defining free will in terms of doing what you want to do... According to this op.on, free will (or ac.ng freely) merely consists in doing what you want, or choose to do Defining free will in terms of the ability to do otherwise... According to this op.on, free will (or ac.ng freely) consists in one s having the power to do otherwise
22 A helpful example to help understand the difference John Locke s famous locked room example... Suppose a man be carried whilst fast asleep into a room where there is a person that he longs to see and speak with... And be there locked fast in, beyond his power to get out, he awakes and is glad to find himself in so desirable company... so much so that he decides to stay willingly in the room and converse rather than leave...
23 Alan s Mystery Room Stay or Leave? STAY!!!!!
24 Did Alan have free will in this case? Was it really in his power to do anything but stay?
25 Free will is best defined in terms of possessing the ability to do otherwise. So we act freely in doing X if and only if, at the time just before we do X it is in our power to do otherwise than X
26 Defining free will as the ability to do otherwise... Defining the free will thesis... To say that we have free will means that we are some.mes in the following posi.on with respect to a contemplated future act: We simultaneously have the ability to both perform X AND refrain from performing X In other words, we freely do X if and only if, at the Gme just before we do X it is in our power to do otherwise than X
27 The million dollar question!!!
28 Is it possible for free will to exist in a deterministic world?
29 Answering the compatibility question... If you answer No, then you re an incompagbilist The incompagbilist thesis is the thesis that determinism and the free- will thesis could not both be true If you answer Yes, then you re a compagbilist The compagbilist thesis is the thesis that determinism and the free- will thesis could both be true
30 A fairly intuitive argument for compatibilism (1) It appears that I have free will and that the future is genuinely open like a garden of forking paths (2) It appears that the universe is determinisgc such that given its state at one.me and the laws of nature, every future state of the universe follows of necessity Therefore, (3) It appears that free will and determinism are compagble with one another
31 It has seemed obvious to most people who have not been exposed (perhaps subjected would be a beler word) to philosophy that free will and determinism are incompagble... Indeed, people who have not been exposed to philosophy usually understand the word determinism (if they know the word at all) to stand for the thesis that there is no free will. And you might think that the incompa.bility of free will and determinism deserves to seem obvious- - because it is obvious However, many philosophers are compagbilists... In fact, compa.bilism has an illustrious history among English- speaking philosophers... [and according to some compa.bilist accounts] compagbilism can look like nothing more than robust common sense... Peter van Inwagen
32 I think that compatibilists can make their doctrine seem like common sense only by sweeping a mystery under the carpet and that, despite their best efforts, the bulge shows. People are aware that something is amiss with compatibilism even when they are unable to articulate their misgivings. [And] I believe that it is possible to lift the carpet and dispel the hidden mystery. [For] the notion of not having a choice has a certain logic to it...
33 Van Inwagen s consequence argument... The consequence argument is widely regarded as the best argument for the conclusion that if determinism is true, then no one ever really has a choice about anything For if determinism is true, then our acts are just a consequence of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. And since it's not up to us what went on before we were born nor what the laws of nature are, the consequences of these things (including our present acts) are not up to us
34 Van Inwagen s consequence argument... A non- technical formulagon of van Inwagen s consequence argument (1) No one has power over the facts of the past and the laws of nature (2) No one has power over the fact that the facts of the past and the laws of nature entail that only one future is possible Therefore, (3) No one has power over the facts of the future
35 Van Inwagen s consequence argument... The consequence argument seems to preclude the common sense no.on of free will that we ve been considering. For if determinism is true, then our acts are just a consequence of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. And since it's not up to us what went on before we were born nor what the laws of nature are, the consequences of these things (including our present acts) are not up to us So it looks like free will is inconsistent with determinism, which means that the thesis of compagbilism is false aner all
36 Is van Inwagen a determinist?
37 Van Inwagen s consequence argument... An important to point to emphasize: Van Inwagen is an incompagbilist, not a determinist! In other words, all that Van Inwagen wants to do is show that the compagbilist thesis (namely, the thesis that determinism and the free- will thesis could both be true) is false + =
38 What do you think?
39 The reasoning underwriting the consequence argument is captured in what van Inwagen calls the no choice principle (NCP)
40 Here is an example that will illustrate what this thesis/principle implies. Suppose it s an untouchable fact that the last dinosaur died long before I was born. And suppose also that the following condi.onal statement expresses an untouchable fact: if the last dinosaur died long before I was born, then I have never seen a living dinosaur. It follows from these two supposi.ons that it s an untouchable fact that I have never seen a living dinosaur. Is the Principle correct? It is hard to see how anyone could deny it. How could anyone be able to do anything about something that is an inevitable consequence of something no one can do anything about? But if determinism is true and if the Principle is correct, then all facts are untouchable facts. So it follows, given the Principle, that determinism implies that there is no free will... The No Choice Principle - Peter van Inwagen
41 This is the hidden mystery that, I contend, lies behind the facade that common sense compatibilism presents to the world: the compatibilist must reject the Principle, and the Principle seems to be true beyond all possibility of dispute...
42 The consequence argument is just a particular application of the No Choice Principle
43 Van Inwagen s argument against compatibilism (1) The theory of CompaGbilism is true only if the No Choice Principle is false (2) But, the No Choice Principle is not false Therefore, (3) The theory of CompaGbilism is not true Therefore, (4) The free will thesis and the theory of Determinism cannot both be true simultaneously
44 This is really bad news for compatibilists...
45 Where do we go from here?
46 Since compatibilism hides a mystery, should we not therefore be incompatibilists?
47 Why not just reject the thesis of determinism and accept an indeterministic incompatibilism?
48 How about indeterministic incompatibilism? Quantum intederminism? Suppose that our world works in the way that a quantum- mechanical theory claims that it does indeterminisgcally On this account, if the laws of nature are quantum- mechanical, then they merely probilify a set of outcomes rather than determine a single unique outcome And so, perhaps this indeterminisgc view of the world makes room for the no.on of free will
49 But do such appeals to indeterminacy really help solve the problem? Is indeterminism any more compatible with free will than Determinism?
50 Unfortunately, incompatibilism also holds a mystery... since the indeterminism that seems to be required for free will seems also to destroy free will...
51 Suppose Jane is in an agony of indecision; if her delibera.ons go one way, she will in a moment speak the words, John, I lied to you about Alice, and if her delibera.ons go the other way, she will bite her tongue and remain silent. Let us look carefully at the consequences of supposing that human behavior is undetermined... Let us suppose that there is a certain current- pulse that is proceeding along one of the neural pathways in Jane s brain and that it is about to come to a fork. And let us suppose that if it goes to the len, she will make her confession; and that if it goes to the right, she will remain silent. And let us suppose that it is undetermined which way the pulse goes when it comes to the fork: even an omniscient being with a complete knowledge of the state of Jane s brain and a complete knowledge of the laws of physics and unlimited powers of calcula.on could say no more than: The laws and present state of her brain would allow the pulse to go either way... The Liar example - Peter van Inwagen
52 Consequently, no predic.on of what the pulse will do when it comes to the fork is possible; it might go to the le`, and it might go to the right, and that s all there is to be said. Now let us ask: does Jane have any choice about whether the pulse goes to the len or to the right? If we think about this quesgon for a moment, we shall see that it is very hard to see how she could have any choice about that... If it goes to the len, that just happens. If it goes to the right, that just happens. There is no way for Jane to influence the pulse. There is no way for her to make it go one way rather than the other. Or, at least, there is no way for her to make it go one way rather than the other and leave the choice it makes an undetermined event... The Liar example - Peter van Inwagen
53 The gist of this reasoning is sometimes referred to as the mind argument
54 The basic idea behind the mind argument is this... The Mind argument is a kind of argument designed to show that indeterminism and free will are incompagble. More precisely, it is designed to show that posigng indeterminism in key places in the causal chain leading to the agent s ac.on undermines rather than makes room for free will, by making the relevant acgons seem random and hence unfree
55 What s the point?
56 The basic idea behind the mind argument is this... If my acgons are caused by events or processes that are themselves indeterminisgc, then they won t be any more up to me than if they were caused by events that follow determinis.cally from events that occurred before I was born So it seems like if we lack freedom of ac.on in a determinis.c world, it s not clear that we re going to get it by moving to an indeterminis.c world So, in the end, it appears that denying determinism is really no help in making space for genuine freedom
57 All of this leaves us with a very troubling dilemma to consider
58 Perhaps the explanation why both compatibilism and incompatibilism seem to lead to mysteries is simply that the concept of free will is selfcontradictory... If free will is incompatible with both determinism and indeterminism, then, since either determinism or indeterminism has to be true, free will is impossible. And, of course, what is impossible does not exist...
59 A very troubling anti free will dilemma to consider... (1) If the thesis of determinism is true, then the free will thesis is false (by the consequence argument) (2) If the thesis of indeterminism is true, then the free will thesis is false (by the mind argument) (3) Either the thesis of determinism or the thesis of indeterminism is true Therefore, (4) The free will thesis is false whether the world is determinisgc or indeterminisgc
60 Since the dilemma argument is clearly valid, and all three premises seem to be well supported (if not true), it looks like we have a very persuasive argument for the conclusion that: contrary to our common sense intuitions there is no such thing as free will after all
61 Where do we go from here?
Am I free? Free will vs. determinism
Am I free? Free will vs. determinism Our topic today is, for the second day in a row, freedom of the will. More precisely, our topic is the relationship between freedom of the will and determinism, and
More informationThe Mystery of Libertarianism
The Mystery of Libertarianism Conclusion So Far: Here are the three main questions we have asked so far: (1) Is Determinism True? Are our actions determined by our genes, our upbringing, the laws of physics
More informationComprehensive. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
360 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Comprehensive Compatibilism
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3b Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3b Free Will Review of definitions Incompatibilists believe that that free will and determinism are not compatible. This means that you can not be both free and determined
More informationThe Powers of Rational Beings: Freedom of the Will
12 The Powers of Rational Beings: Freedom of the Will We now turn to another mystery, a mystery about the powers of rational beings; that is, a mystery about what human beings are able to do. This mystery
More informationThe Consequence Argument
2015.11.16 The Consequence Argument The topic What is free will? Some paradigm cases. (linked to concepts like coercion, action, and esp. praise and blame) The claim that we don t have free will.... Free
More informationBad Luck Once Again. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society Bad Luck Once Again neil levy Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University
More informationFinal Paper. May 13, 2015
24.221 Final Paper May 13, 2015 Determinism states the following: given the state of the universe at time t 0, denoted S 0, and the conjunction of the laws of nature, L, the state of the universe S at
More informationCompatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued
Compatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued Jeff Speaks March 24, 2009 1 Arguments for compatibilism............................ 1 1.1 Arguments from the analysis of free will.................. 1 1.2
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationSUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5)
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5) Introduction We often say things like 'I couldn't resist buying those trainers'. In saying this, we presumably mean that the desire to
More informationTo appear in Metaphysics: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
To appear in Metaphysics: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82, Cambridge University Press, 2018. Compatibilism, Indeterminism, and Chance PENELOPE MACKIE Abstract Many contemporary compatibilists
More informationTHE ASSIMILATION ARGUMENT AND THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT
THE ASSIMILATION ARGUMENT AND THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT Christopher Evan Franklin ~Penultimate Draft~ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93:3, (2012): 395-416. For final version go to http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01432.x/abstract
More informationFree Will [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
8/18/09 9:53 PM The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Free Will Most of us are certain that we have free will, though what exactly this amounts to
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
More informationPhilosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University
Philosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University John Martin Fischer University of California, Riverside It is
More informationMETAPHYSICS. The Problem of Free Will
METAPHYSICS The Problem of Free Will WHAT IS FREEDOM? surface freedom Being able to do what you want Being free to act, and choose, as you will BUT: what if what you will is not under your control? free
More informationA Taxonomy of Free Will Positions
58 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism A Taxonomy of Free Will
More informationA New Argument Against Compatibilism
Norwegian University of Life Sciences School of Economics and Business A New Argument Against Compatibilism Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum Working Papers No. 2/ 2014 ISSN: 2464-1561 A New Argument
More informationThe Paradox of Free Will
The Paradox of Free Will Free Will If some unimpeachable source God, say were to tell me that I didn t have free will, I d have to regard that piece of information as proof that I didn t understand the
More informationFree Acts and Chance: Why the Rollback Argument Fails Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley
1 Free Acts and Chance: Why the Rollback Argument Fails Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley ABSTRACT: The rollback argument, pioneered by Peter van Inwagen, purports to show that indeterminism in any form is incompatible
More informationFree Will as an Open Scientific Problem
Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem Mark Balaguer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this
More informationThe Incoherence of Compatibilism Zahoor H. Baber *
* Abstract The perennial philosophical problem of freedom and determinism seems to have a solution through the widely known philosophical doctrine called Compatibilism. The Compatibilist philosophers contend
More informationMORAL RESPONSIBILITY, DETERMINISM, AND THE ABILITY TO DO OTHERWISE
PETER VAN INWAGEN MORAL RESPONSIBILITY, DETERMINISM, AND THE ABILITY TO DO OTHERWISE (Received 7 December 1998; accepted 28 April 1999) ABSTRACT. In his classic paper, The Principle of Alternate Possibilities,
More informationThe Problem of Freewill. Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty
The Problem of Freewill Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty Two Common Sense Beliefs Freewill Thesis: some (though not all) of our actions are performed freely we examines and deliberate about our options we
More informationCausation and Free Will
Causation and Free Will T L Hurst Revised: 17th August 2011 Abstract This paper looks at the main philosophic positions on free will. It suggests that the arguments for causal determinism being compatible
More informationThe Zygote Argument remixed
Analysis Advance Access published January 27, 2011 The Zygote Argument remixed JOHN MARTIN FISCHER John and Mary have fully consensual sex, but they do not want to have a child, so they use contraception
More informationAlfred Mele s Modest. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Libertarianism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism.
336 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Alfred Mele s Modest
More informationDENNETT ON THE BASIC ARGUMENT JOHN MARTIN FISCHER
. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK, and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA METAPHILOSOPHY Vol. 36, No. 4, July 2005 0026-1068 DENNETT ON THE BASIC ARGUMENT
More informationKane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention
Kane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention Gregg D Caruso SUNY Corning Robert Kane s event-causal libertarianism proposes a naturalized account of libertarian free
More informationHence, you and your choices are a product of God's creation Psychological State. Stephen E. Schmid
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationThe Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument
The Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument Richard Johns Department of Philosophy University of British Columbia August 2006 Revised March 2009 The Luck Argument seems to show
More informationDoes Theism Imply Determinism? Questions about Hard Determinism. Objections to Hard Determinism, I. Objections to Hard Determinism, II
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationTHE SENSE OF FREEDOM 1. Dana K. Nelkin. I. Introduction. abandon even in the face of powerful arguments that this sense is illusory.
THE SENSE OF FREEDOM 1 Dana K. Nelkin I. Introduction We appear to have an inescapable sense that we are free, a sense that we cannot abandon even in the face of powerful arguments that this sense is illusory.
More informationDETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little
DETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little more carefully, that every event is fully caused by its antecedent conditions or causal circumstances. The conditions
More informationDavid Hume, Liberty and Necessity. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII
+ David Hume, Liberty and Necessity An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII + Liberty and Necessity intractable dispute: Do we have free will ( liberty ), or are choices causally determined
More informationFREE ACTS AND CHANCE: WHY THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT FAILS
The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 63, No. 250 January 2013 ISSN 0031-8094 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00094.x FREE ACTS AND CHANCE: WHY THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT FAILS BY LARA BUCHAK The rollback argument,
More informationWHY PLANTINGA FAILS TO RECONCILE DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE
WHY PLANTINGA FAILS TO RECONCILE DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE AND LIBERTARIAN FREE WILL Andrew Rogers KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Abstract In this paper I argue that Plantinga fails to reconcile libertarian free will
More informationCompatibilism and the Basic Argument
ESJP #12 2017 Compatibilism and the Basic Argument Lennart Ackermans 1 Introduction In his book Freedom Evolves (2003) and article (Taylor & Dennett, 2001), Dennett constructs a compatibilist theory of
More informationFree Will: Do We Have It?
Free Will: Do We Have It? This book explains the problem of free will and contains a brief summary of the essential arguments in Ayer's "Freedom and Necessity" and Chisholm's "Human Freedom and the Self".
More informationKane on. FREE WILL and DETERMINISM
Kane on FREE WILL and DETERMINISM Introduction Ch. 1: The free will problem In Kane s terms on pp. 5-6, determinism involves prior sufficient conditions for what we do. Possible prior conditions include
More informationI will briefly summarize each of the 11 chapters and then offer a few critical comments.
Hugh J. McCann (ed.), Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology, Oxford University Press, 2017, 230pp., $74.00, ISBN 9780190611200. Reviewed by Garrett Pendergraft,
More informationFree will and the necessity of the past
free will and the necessity of the past 105 Free will and the necessity of the past Joseph Keim Campbell 1. Introduction In An Essay on Free Will (1983), Peter van Inwagen offers three arguments for incompatibilism,
More informationPrompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response
Prompt: Explain van Inwagen s consequence argument. Describe what you think is the best response to this argument. Does this response succeed in saving compatibilism from the consequence argument? Why
More informationWhat would be so bad about not having libertarian free will?
Nathan Nobis nobs@mail.rochester.edu http://mail.rochester.edu/~nobs/papers/det.pdf ABSTRACT: What would be so bad about not having libertarian free will? Peter van Inwagen argues that unattractive consequences
More informationChapter Six Compatibilism: Mele, Alfred E. (2006). Free Will and Luck. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Chapter Six Compatibilism: Objections and Replies Mele, Alfred E. (2006). Free Will and Luck. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Overview Refuting Arguments Against Compatibilism Consequence Argument van
More informationPhilosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas
Philosophy of Religion 21:161-169 (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas A defense of middle knowledge RICHARD OTTE Cowell College, University of Calfiornia, Santa Cruz,
More informationFREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY. James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA RESEARCH TEAM James J. Lee, Department of Psychology Matt McGue, Department
More informationPOWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM
POWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM Thought 3:3 (2014): 225-229 ~Penultimate Draft~ The final publication is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tht3.139/abstract Abstract: Stephen Mumford
More informationFour Views on Free Will. John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas
Four Views on Free Will John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas Contents Notes on Contributors Acknowledgments vi viii A Brief Introduction to Some Terms and Concepts 1 1 Libertarianism
More informationCRITICAL STUDY FISCHER ON MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 188 July 1997 ISSN 0031 8094 CRITICAL STUDY FISCHER ON MORAL RESPONSIBILITY BY PETER VAN INWAGEN The Metaphysics of Free Will: an Essay on Control. BY JOHN MARTIN
More informationThe Metaphysics of Freedom
MASTERS (MA) RESEARCH ESSAY DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND The Metaphysics of Freedom Time, Kant and Compatibilism By Duncan Bekker 0708070F Supervised by Murali Ramachandran
More informationALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND THE FREE WILL DEFENCE
Rel. Stud. 33, pp. 267 286. Printed in the United Kingdom 1997 Cambridge University Press ANDREW ESHLEMAN ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND THE FREE WILL DEFENCE I The free will defence attempts to show that
More informationFree Will. Christian Wüthrich Metaphysics Fall 2012
Free Will http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 130 Metaphysics Fall 2012 Some introductory thoughts: The traditional problem of freedom and determinism The traditional problem of freedom and determinism
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism Let me state at the outset a basic point that will reappear again below with its justification. The title of this chapter (and many other discussions too) make it appear
More informationHow Necessary is the Past? Reply to Campbell MATTHEW H. SLATER
How Necessary is the Past? Reply to Campbell MATTHEW H. SLATER e best known argument for Incompatibilism van Inwagen s (1983, 56) third Consequence Argument trades on our ordinary assent to the past s
More informationTHE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
More informationPredictability, Causation, and Free Will
Predictability, Causation, and Free Will Luke Misenheimer (University of California Berkeley) August 18, 2008 The philosophical debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists about free will and determinism
More informationmoral absolutism agents moral responsibility
Moral luck Last time we discussed the question of whether there could be such a thing as objectively right actions -- actions which are right, independently of relativization to the standards of any particular
More informationPhilosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 FREE WILL REMAINS A MYSTERY. The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture
Philosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 FREE WILL REMAINS A MYSTERY The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture Peter van Inwagen The University of Notre Dame This paper has two parts.
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationForeknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments
Foreknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments Jeff Speaks January 25, 2011 1 Warfield s argument for compatibilism................................ 1 2 Why the argument fails to show that free will and
More informationA Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility
A Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility If Frankfurt is right, he has shown that moral responsibility is compatible with the denial of PAP, but he hasn t yet given us a detailed account
More informationFreedom, Responsibility, and Frankfurt-style Cases
Freedom, Responsibility, and Frankfurt-style Cases Bruce Macdonald University College London MPhilStud Masters in Philosophical Studies 1 Declaration I, Bruce Macdonald, confirm that the work presented
More informationVan Inwagen's modal argument for incompatibilism
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2015 Mar 28th, 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM Van Inwagen's modal argument for incompatibilism Katerina
More informationFree Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility: An Analysis of Event-Causal Incompatibilism
Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Philosophy Honors Projects Philosophy Department July 2017 Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility: An Analysis of Event-Causal Incompatibilism
More informationIs Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God?
Is Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God? by Kel Good A very interesting attempt to avoid the conclusion that God's foreknowledge is inconsistent with creaturely freedom is an essay entitled
More informationA Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism
A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism Abstract Saul Smilansky s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is
More informationPHLA Freedom and Determinism II
Freedom and Determinism II Compatibilism Two propositions are compatible just in case they can both be true together This does not imply that they are both true, or that one of them is true It just says
More informationThis handout follows the handout on Hume on causation. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Hume on free will This handout follows the handout on Hume on causation. You should read that handout first. HUMAN ACTION AND CAUSAL NECESSITY In Enquiry VIII, Hume claims that the history
More information16 Free Will Requires Determinism
16 Free Will Requires Determinism John Baer The will is infinite, and the execution confined... the desire is boundless, and the act a slave to limit. William Shakespeare, Troilus and Cressida, III. ii.75
More informationFree Will, Genuine Alternatives and Predictability
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2011 Free Will, Genuine Alternatives and Predictability Laura Hagen Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Hagen,
More informationHABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2007 HABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems Michael Quante In a first step, I disentangle the issues of scientism and of compatiblism
More informationIS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?''
IS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?'' Wesley Morriston In an impressive series of books and articles, Alvin Plantinga has developed challenging new versions of two much discussed pieces of philosophical theology:
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #23 Hume on the Self and Free Will Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Mindreading Video Marcus, Modern
More informationTestamentum Imperium Volume Volume
www.preciousheart.net/ti Volume 2 2009 Morally Significant Freedom, Moral Responsibility, and Causal Determinism: A Compatibilist View Dr. John Calvin Wingard, Jr. 1 Professor of Philosophy Covenant College,
More informationAn Argument for Moral Nihilism
Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Spring 5-1-2010 An Argument for Moral Nihilism Tommy Fung Follow this
More informationDOES STRONG COMPATIBILISM SURVIVE FRANKFURT COUNTER-EXAMPLES?
MICHAEL S. MCKENNA DOES STRONG COMPATIBILISM SURVIVE FRANKFURT COUNTER-EXAMPLES? (Received in revised form 11 October 1996) Desperate for money, Eleanor and her father Roscoe plan to rob a bank. Roscoe
More informationLibertarian Free Will and Chance
Libertarian Free Will and Chance 1. The Luck Principle: We have repeatedly seen philosophers claim that indeterminism does not get us free will, since something like the following is true: The Luck Principle
More informationEvil and Omnipotence
Evil and Omnipotence J. L. Mackie The problem of evil, according to Mackie, is that the following set of proposi>ons is inconsistent. 1. God is omnipotent. There are no limits to what an omnipotent being
More informationChance, Possibility, and Explanation Nina Emery
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access published October 25, 2013 Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 0 (2013), 1 26 Chance, Possibility, and Explanation ABSTRACT I argue against the common and
More information6 On the Luck Objection to Libertarianism
6 On the Luck Objection to Libertarianism David Widerker and Ira M. Schnall 1 Introduction Libertarians typically believe that we are morally responsible for the decisions (or choices) we make only if
More informationDivine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise
Religious Studies 42, 123 139 f 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/s0034412506008250 Printed in the United Kingdom Divine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise HUGH RICE Christ
More informationPreface. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism. Impossibilism.
xvi Illusionism Impossibilism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism Soft Incompatibilism Source Incompatibilism
More informationUnit 3. Free Will and Determinism. Monday, November 21, 11
Unit 3 Free Will and Determinism I. Introduction A. What is the problem? Science! Why? 1. The universe is governed by physical laws 2. People are part of the universe Therefore: People are governed by
More informationFree will & divine foreknowledge
Free will & divine foreknowledge Jeff Speaks March 7, 2006 1 The argument from the necessity of the past.................... 1 1.1 Reply 1: Aquinas on the eternity of God.................. 3 1.2 Reply
More informationFree will and foreknowledge
Free will and foreknowledge Jeff Speaks April 17, 2014 1. Augustine on the compatibility of free will and foreknowledge... 1 2. Edwards on the incompatibility of free will and foreknowledge... 1 3. Response
More informationFree Agents as Cause
Free Agents as Cause Daniel von Wachter January 28, 2009 This is a preprint version of: Wachter, Daniel von, 2003, Free Agents as Cause, On Human Persons, ed. K. Petrus. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 183-194.
More informationThe Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will
Stance Volume 3 April 2010 The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will ABSTRACT: I examine Leibniz s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention
More informationDaniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause
Daniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause The dilemma of free will is that if actions are caused deterministically, then they are not free, and if they are not caused deterministically then they are not
More informationFirst published Mon Apr 26, 2004; substantive revision Mon Oct 5, 2009
1 of 44 10/11/2010 3:09 PM Open access to the Encyclopedia has been made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. See the list of contributing institutions. If your institution is not on the list,
More informationThe Mind Argument and Libertarianism
The Mind Argument and Libertarianism ALICIA FINCH and TED A. WARFIELD Many critics of libertarian freedom have charged that freedom is incompatible with indeterminism. We show that the strongest argument
More informationFree Will and Theism. Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns. edited by Kevin Timpe and Daniel Speak
Free Will and Theism Connections, Contingencies, and Concerns edited by Kevin Timpe and Daniel Speak 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department
More informationFree Agency and its Place within Psychology. Michael M. Pitman
Free Agency and its Place within Psychology Michael M. Pitman A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
More informationBUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS
BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences Doctoral School in History and Philosophy of Science A Relational Theory of Moral Responsibility and related essays
More informationLeeway vs. Sourcehood Conceptions of Free Will (for the Routledge Companion to Free Will)
Leeway vs. Sourcehood Conceptions of Free Will (for the Routledge Companion to Free Will) Kevin Timpe 1 Introduction One reason that many of the philosophical debates about free will might seem intractable
More information24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI
24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI free will again summary final exam info Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. 24.09 F11 1 the first part of the incompatibilist argument Image removed due to copyright
More informationFolk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility: Determinism vs. Reductionism
Folk Fears about Freedom and Responsibility: Determinism vs. Reductionism EDDY NAHMIAS* 1. Folk Intuitions and Folk Psychology My initial work, with collaborators Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and
More informationLocke On Liberty And Necessity
Locke On Liberty And Necessity Dr. Aysel DOĞAN Abstract. For John Locke, free will is nonsensical. He contends that mere voluntariness is insufficient for freedom of action. In addition, he points out,
More informationThe free will defense
The free will defense Last time we began discussing the central argument against the existence of God, which I presented as the following reductio ad absurdum of the proposition that God exists: 1. God
More information