Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I
|
|
|
- Tyrone Lamb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I Academic Year
2 Department: PHILOSOPHY Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE Scheme of Course Structure (Faculty of Arts) LOGIC Semester Name of Paper Title of Paper No. of (YSP) Credits F.Y. B.A. Theory Paper - 1 Logical Reasoning: Indian and Western 3 Sem I (LOG1101) F.Y. B.A. Theory Paper - 2 Symbolic Logic: Elementary 3 Sem II (LOG1201)
3 F.Y. B.A. Logic Semester I Objectives: LOG1101 Logical Reasoning: Indian and Western i. To introduce Logic as an academic subject ii. To introduce fundamental concepts in the process of reasoning iii. To provide a historical background for Indian and Western Logic iv. To introduce Syllogistic Logic in both, Indian as well as western context. Unit I 1.1. What is Logic? Why study Logic? 1.2. A brief history of Logic 1.3. Understanding Basic Concepts: Argument, Inference, Proposition, Truth, Validity and Soundness 1.4. Deductive and Inductive Inferences 1.5. Logical Reasoning in the Indian Tradition: Methods of argumentation 1.6. Introduction to Nyaya Epistemology Unit II 2.1. Traditional Classification of Propositions: Hypothetical, Disjunctive and Categorical 2.2. Nature and Classification of Categorical Propositions 2.3. Mediate and Immediate Inferences: Opposition as an Immediate Inference (Square of Opposition) 2.4. Conversion, Obversion and Contraposition 2.5. Mediate Inferences: Categorical Syllogism: Syllogistic Rules and Fallacies 2.6. Venn Diagram technique for proving validity of Syllogisms Unit III 3.1. Other Mediate Inferences: Disjunctive and Hypothetical Syllogisms: Rules and Fallacies 3.2. Dilemma: Simple and Complex, Refutation and Rebuttal 3.3. Nature of Panchavayavi Vakya 3.4. Nyaya Anumana: Concepts of Hetu, Sadhya, Paksha and Vyapti 3.5. Classification of Anumana Unit IV 4.1. Fallacies: Nature and Classification 4.2. Understanding Informal Fallacies: Petitio Principi, Ignoratio Elenchi (Baculum, Hominem, Misericordium, Verecundium, Ignoratium, Populum), Division, Composition, Accident, Converse Accident Hetvabhasas: The fallacies of the Nyaya theory of Inference Books for Reference: 1. Introduction to Logic, by Irving Copi, Karl Kohen and Kenneth M cmohan, 14 th Edition, Relevant Chapters 2. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Dhirendramohan Datta and Satishchandra Chatterjee
4 Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER II Academic Year
5 F.Y. B.A. Logic Semester II Objectives LOG1201 Symbolic Logic: Elementary i. To acquaint students with symbolic Logic. ii. To introduce techniques of decision procedure and formal proof of Validity iii. To introduce preliminary Set theory. Unit I 1.1. Need for Symbolic Logic 1.2. Modern Classification of Propositions: Simple and Compound; Truth Functionally and Non- Truth Functionally Compound 1.3. Types of Truth Functions; Symbolization of Propositions 1.4. Exercises in Symbolization Unit II 2.1. Understanding the Basic Truth-functions 2.2. Methods of Decision Procedure: Truth-table, Shorter Truth-table and Truth-tree 2.3. Determining Propositions as Tautologies, Contradictory and Contingent Unit III 3.1. Proving Validity: Deductive Proof 3.2. Rules of Inference and Rules of Replacement 3.3. Conditional and Indirect Proof Methods 3.4. Proving Invalidity Unit IV 4.1. Introduction to Set Theory 4.2. Definitions and Nature of: Sets, elements of sets, sub-set, proper sub-set, null-set, universal sets, compliment of set, identity of sets 4.3. Modes of specifying sets: listing, defining Basic operation on sets: union, intersection, complementation. Books for Reference: 1. Introduction to Logic, by Irving Copi, Karl Kohen and Kenneth M cmohan, 14 th Edition 2. Pattrick Suppees (Chapter on Set Theory)
FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,
FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination, 2015-16 8. PHILOSOPHY SCHEME Two Papers Min. pass marks 72 Max. Marks 200 Paper - I 3 hrs duration 100 Marks Paper - II 3 hrs duration 100 Marks PAPER - I: HISTORY
SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS
Prof. C. Byrne Dept. of Philosophy SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC Syllogistic logic is the original form in which formal logic was developed; hence it is sometimes also referred to as Aristotelian logic after Aristotle,
MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness
MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.
Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training
Study Guides Chapter 1 - Basic Training Argument: A group of propositions is an argument when one or more of the propositions in the group is/are used to give evidence (or if you like, reasons, or grounds)
North Orissa University Sriram Chandra Vihar Takatpur, Baripada Mayurbhanj
B. A Philosophy (Pass) Syllabus CHOICE BASED CREDIT SYSTEM w. e. f. Admission Batch (2016-2017) for Affiliated Colleges North Orissa University Sriram Chandra Vihar Takatpur, Baripada Mayurbhanj-757003
Logic & Philosophy Sample Questions
Logic & Philosophy Sample Questions Unit-I (Logic: Deductive and Inductive) 1. The validity of an argument depends on a. the form of the argument b. the content of the argument c. the truth of premises
INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms
1 GLOSSARY INTERMEDIATE LOGIC BY JAMES B. NANCE INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms This glossary includes terms that are defined in the text in the lesson and on the page noted. It does not include
GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS
PRACTICAL LOGIC Bryan Rennie GENERAL NOTES ON THE CLASS EXPLANATION OF GRADES AND POINTS, ETC. SAMPLE QUIZZES SCHEDULE OF CLASSES THE SIX RULES OF SYLLOGISMS (and corresponding fallacies) SYMBOLS USED
B.A./Alankar First Year
B.A./Alankar First Year Paper I - Indian Logic Paper II - Western Logic Second Year Paper I - Indian Epistemology and Metaphysics Paper II - Western Epistemology and Metaphysics Paper I - Indian Ethics
Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs
Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University Chapter 9- Sentential roofs 9.1 Introduction So far we have introduced three ways of assessing the validity of truth-functional arguments.
R.T.M. NAGPUR UNIVERSITY NAGPUR PHILOSOPHY B. A. I Semester I ETHICS (INDIAN)
Unit I: Indian Ethics R.T.M. NAGPUR UNIVERSITY NAGPUR PHILOSOPHY B. A. I Semester I ETHICS (INDIAN) Definition, nature & Scope of Indian Ethics. Four stages of development. Characteristics of Indian Ethics
Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.
Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments What You Will Learn Symbolic arguments Standard forms of arguments 3.5-2 Symbolic Arguments A symbolic argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. It is called
Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. Questions
Questions I. Terms, Etc. 1. What is a Term? Explain and illustrate the chief divisions of Terms. What is meant by the Connotation of a Term? Illustrate. [S] 2. The connotation and denotation of terms vary
Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI
Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase
Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide
Chapter 6: Categorical Syllogisms Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide A. Standard-form Categorical Syllogisms A categorical syllogism is an argument containing three categorical propositions: two premises
RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, NAGPUR SYLLABUS B. A. (C.B.S) SUBJECT : PHILOSOPHY (U.G.)
RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, NAGPUR SYLLABUS B. A. (C.B.S) SUBJECT : PHILOSOPHY (U.G.) PAPERS B. A. I 1 T 1 (ETHICS : INDIAN) B. A. II 3 T 1 (LOGIC : INDIAN) B. A. III 5 T 1 (EPISTEMOLOGY
The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic
The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic TANG Mingjun The Institute of Philosophy Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Shanghai, P.R. China Abstract: This paper is a preliminary inquiry into the main
Galen A. Foresman, Peter S. Fosl, and Jamie Carlin Watson CRITICAL THINKING
The Galen A. Foresman, Peter S. Fosl, and Jamie Carlin Watson CRITICAL THINKING THE CRITICAL THINKING TOOLKIT GALEN A. FORESMAN, PETER S. FOSL, AND JAMIE C. WATSON THE CRITICAL THINKING TOOLKIT This
1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4
1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4 Summary Notes These are summary notes so that you can really listen in class and not spend the entire time copying notes. These notes will not substitute for reading the
Indian Philosophy Paper-I
1 Total Question -30+20+30+35+35=150 Indian Philosophy Paper-I 1.Describe the Carvaka position that perception is the only means of knowledge. 5 2.What are the conditions for Testimony, to be a valid source
Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n
Logic, reasoning and fallacies and some puzzling Before we start Introductory Examples Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 16.3, 2016/11/21 12:58:26) Wednesday, November
Indian Philosophy Prof. Satya Sundar Sethy Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Indian Philosophy Prof. Satya Sundar Sethy Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module No. # 05 Lecture No. # 20 The Nyaya Philosophy Hi, today we will be
Philosophy 1100: Ethics
Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 1 - Course Introduction: 1. What is Philosophy? 2. What is Ethics? 3. Logic a. Truth b. Arguments c. Validity d. Soundness What is Philosophy? The Three Fundamental Questions
PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.
PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1 W# Section (10 or 11) 1. True or False (5 points) Directions: Circle the letter next to the best answer. 1. T F All true statements are valid. 2. T
Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University
Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University 2012 CONTENTS Part I Critical Thinking Chapter 1 Basic Training 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Logic, Propositions and Arguments 1.3 Deduction and Induction
Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic
Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,
Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms
Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms Consider Argument 1 and Argument 2, and select the option that correctly identifies the valid argument(s), if any. Argument 1 All bears are omnivores. All omnivores
Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms
Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall Stetson University Chapter 8 - Sentential ruth ables and Argument orms 8.1 Introduction he truth-value of a given truth-functional compound proposition depends
Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University
Complications for Categorical Syllogisms PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University Overall Plan First, I will present some problematic propositions and
In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES
IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES Instructions: Determine whether the following are propositions. If some are not propositions, see if they can be rewritten as propositions. (1) I have a very refined sense of smell.
Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.
Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments INB able of Contents Date opic Page # July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Examples 84 July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Notes 85 July 28, 2014 Section 3.6 Examples 86 July 28, 2014 Section
13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments
EulerDiagrams.nb 1 13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic rguments In the preceding section, we showed how to determine the validity of symbolic arguments using truth tables and comparing the arguments to
Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism
Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language
Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life
Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Why Study Philosophy? Defining Philosophy Studying philosophy in a serious and reflective way will change you as a person Philosophy Is
Instructor s Manual 1
Instructor s Manual 1 PREFACE This instructor s manual will help instructors prepare to teach logic using the 14th edition of Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, and Kenneth McMahon s Introduction to Logic. The
Logic & Philosophy. SSB Syllabus
Logic & Philosophy SSB Syllabus Unit-I (Logic: Deductive and Inductive) Truth and Validity, Sentence and Proposition (According To Quality and Quantity), Classification of Propositions, Immediate Inference:
Topics to be covered
Department of Philosophy : Nizam college, OU Sub: Logic Number of Hours 1. What is Logic 2 2. Branches of logic (Philosophy) 2 3. Deductive Logic 2 4. Induction 2 5. Nature of Logic 2 6. Scope of Logic
SCHEME OF B.A. PART I (PASS COURSE) IN PHILOSOPHY SEMESTER SYSTEM FOR THE SESSION
SCHEME OF B.A. PART I (PASS COURSE) IN PHILOSOPHY SEMESTER SYSTEM FOR THE SESSION 2010-11 Class Nomenclature of Paper Internal Theory Total Time Assess. Marks B. A. (Sem.-I) Option (i)out Lines of 10 90
Logic Dictionary Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 August 2017
Logic Dictionary Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 August 2017 addition (Add). In propositional logic, a rule of inference (i.e., an elementary valid argument form) in which (1) the conclusion is a disjunction
5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments
Deductive arguments are commonly used in various kinds of academic writing. In order to be able to perform a critique of deductive arguments, we will need to understand their basic structure. As will be
Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE
CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE Section 1. A Mediate Inference is a proposition that depends for proof upon two or more other propositions, so connected together by one or
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider
An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019
An Introduction to Formal Logic Second edition Peter Smith February 27, 2019 Peter Smith 2018. Not for re-posting or re-circulation. Comments and corrections please to ps218 at cam dot ac dot uk 1 What
Time : Two Hours Full Marks : 50
PGl/(DE)/2014 2014 PHILOSOPHY COURSEI (Indian Ethics) Time : Two Hours Full Marks : 50 The figures in the margin indicate f ull marks. Section A Answer any two questions : 15x2=30 1. Give a detailed account
Pitt State Pathway (Undergraduate Course Numbers through 699)
Please check only one: Pitt State Pathway (Undergraduate Course Numbers through 699) Course is currently a General Education course Course is listed in the current catalog, but is NOT a General Education
What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing
What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing Logical relations Deductive logic Claims to provide conclusive support for the truth of a conclusion Inductive
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Ravenshaw University UG Syllabus (ELECTIVE)
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Ravenshaw University UG Syllabus (ELECTIVE) 2014-2017 Total number of semesters = 04 Total number of courses = 08 Contact hour for each class= 1 hour Contact hours for each course
Anumāna as Analogical Reasoning A Critical Analysis
Anumāna as Analogical Reasoning A Critical Analysis HIMANSU SEKHAR SAMAL (Ravenshaw University, Odisha, India) E- Mail: drhimansusekharsamal@gmail.com Abstract: Like most other branches of knowledge, philosophy
Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module 02 Lecture - 03 So in the last
7. Some recent rulings of the Supreme Court were politically motivated decisions that flouted the entire history of U.S. legal practice.
M05_COPI1396_13_SE_C05.QXD 10/12/07 9:00 PM Page 193 5.5 The Traditional Square of Opposition 193 EXERCISES Name the quality and quantity of each of the following propositions, and state whether their
There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.
INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic Name Period Date Symbolic notation: 1. Define the following symbols. a b ~ c d e g a b c d a b c d 2. Consider the following legend: Let p = You love bananas. Let
Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14
Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,
PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.
Introduction PHI 244 Welcome to PHI 244, About Stephen Texts Course Requirements Syllabus Points of Interest Website http://seschmid.org, http://seschmid.org/teaching Email Policy 1 2 Argument Worksheet
Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?
What is an argument? PHIL 110 Lecture on Chapter 3 of How to think about weird things An argument is a collection of two or more claims, one of which is the conclusion and the rest of which are the premises.
ASSIGNMENTS MAPY (PHILOSOPHY)
ASSIGNMENTS MAPY (PHILOSOPHY) First Year MPY 001: INDIAN PHILOSOPHY MPYE 001: LOGIC MPYE 002: ETHICS MPYE 003: EPISTEMOLOGY MPYE 004: PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN PERSON MPYE 005: WLD RELIGIONS MPYE 006: DALIT
SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
Exam Name SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of
1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
I. LOGIC AND ARGUMENTATION 1 A. LOGIC 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. 3. It doesn t attempt to determine how people in fact reason. 4.
PHILOSOPHY IM 25 SYLLABUS IM SYLLABUS (2019)
PHILOSOPHY IM 25 SYLLABUS IM SYLLABUS (2019) IM SYLLABUS (2019): Philosophy Philosophy IM 25 Syllabus (Available in September) 1 Paper (3 hrs) 1. Introduction Since the time of the ancient Greeks, philosophy
9 Methods of Deduction
M09_COPI1396_13_SE_C09.QXD 10/19/07 3:46 AM Page 372 9 Methods of Deduction 9.1 Formal Proof of Validity 9.2 The Elementary Valid Argument Forms 9.3 Formal Proofs of Validity Exhibited 9.4 Constructing
Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments
Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments Logic teaches us to develop a system of methods and principles to use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others to guide us in constructing arguments
Woods, John (2001). Aristotle s Earlier Logic. Oxford: Hermes Science, xiv pp. ISBN
Woods, John (2001). Aristotle s Earlier Logic. Oxford: Hermes Science, xiv + 216 pp. ISBN 1-903398-20-5. Aristotle s best known contribution to logic is the theory of the categorical syllogism in his Prior
KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY Patgaon, Ranigate, Guwahati SEMESTER: 1 PHILOSOPHY PAPER : 1 LOGIC: 1 BLOCK: 2
GPH S1 01 KRISHNA KANTA HANDIQUI STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY Patgaon, Ranigate, Guwahati-781017 SEMESTER: 1 PHILOSOPHY PAPER : 1 LOGIC: 1 BLOCK: 2 CONTENTS UNIT 6 : Modern analysis of proposition UNIT 7 : Square
Basic Concepts and Skills!
Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your
VERITAS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY
VERITAS EVANGELICAL SEMINARY A research paper, discussing the terms and definitions of inductive and deductive logic, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the certificate in Christian Apologetics
Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction
Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 6, September 26, 2017 Entailment 1/55 Learning goals Semantic entailment Define semantic entailment. Explain subtleties of semantic entailment.
Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic By R.A. Neidorf READ ONLINE
Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic By R.A. Neidorf READ ONLINE If you are searching for a book Deductive Forms: Elementary Logic by R.A. Neidorf in pdf format, in that case you come on to the correct website.
FINO PhD Lectures 2018 Genova, 16 February Fallacies. Cristina Amoretti
FINO PhD Lectures 2018 Genova, 16 February 2018 Fallacies Cristina Amoretti Fallacies Fallacies are are deceptively bad arguments: they resemble valid/sound/good arguments but they are not A fallacy is
accent, fallacy of accident, fallacy of accuracy act-deontology affirming the antecedent affirming the consequent ambiguous, ambiguity ampersand (&)
GLOSSARY accent, fallacy of Accent is one of several informal fallacies. In one form, it consists of placing an unusual stress on a word and drawing a conclusion on the basis of that stress. Example: Thou
Logic & Proofs. Chapter 3 Content. Sentential Logic Semantics. Contents: Studying this chapter will enable you to:
Sentential Logic Semantics Contents: Truth-Value Assignments and Truth-Functions Truth-Value Assignments Truth-Functions Introduction to the TruthLab Truth-Definition Logical Notions Truth-Trees Studying
Reviewed by Joseph Williams, University of Chicago
Reviews The Art of Reasoning, David Kelley (New York: Norton, 1988,412 pages). Reviewed by Joseph Williams, University of Chicago Nothing is more useful than a well-written textbook that seems to layout
ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments
ARGUMENTS Arguments arguments 1 Argument Worksheet 1. An argument is a collection of propositions with one proposition, the conclusion, following from the other propositions, the premises. Inference is
6AANA016 Indian Philosophy: The Orthodox Schools Syllabus Academic year 2012/3
School of Arts & Humanities Department of Philosophy 6AANA016 Indian Philosophy: The Orthodox Schools Syllabus Academic year 2012/3 Basic information Credits: 15 Module Tutor: Dr Will Rasmussen Office:
FALLACIES IN GENERAL IRRELEVANCE AMBIGUITY UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS. Informal Fallacies. PHIL UA-70: Logic. February 17 19, 2015
Informal Fallacies PHIL UA-70: Logic February 17 19, 2015 OUTLINE FALLACIES IN GENERAL FALLACIES OF IRRELEVANCE FALLACIES INVOLVING AMBIGUITY FALLACIES INVOLVING UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS OUTLINE FALLACIES
Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning First Steps to Analyzing an Argument In the following slides, some simple arguments will be given. The steps to begin analyzing each argument
Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5
Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations
What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM
2 4 Deductive Reasoning Learning Targets: I understand deductive reasoning I can use the Law of Detachment I can use a Venn diagram to draw conclusions I can use the Law of Syllogism What other evidence
Logic: A Brief Introduction
Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University PART III - Symbolic Logic Chapter 7 - Sentential Propositions 7.1 Introduction What has been made abundantly clear in the previous discussion
Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!
Logic Book Part 1 by Skylar Ruloff Contents Introduction 3 I Validity and Soundness 4 II Argument Forms 10 III Counterexamples and Categorical Statements 15 IV Strength and Cogency 21 2 Introduction This
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory Christoph Lumer (Appeared in: Argumentation 14 (2000). Pp. 405-423.) ABSTRACT: (1) The aim of the paper is to develop a reduction of fallacy theory, i.e. to "deduce" fallacy
Inductive Reasoning. Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples.
Inductive Reasoning Definition. Basing a conclusion on specific examples. Examples: All crows are black. The sun will rise tomorrow. All Islamic people are terrorists. Gravity: Things fall down. Scientific
CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC
EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION NOTE ON THE TEXT. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY XV xlix I /' ~, r ' o>
Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic
Announcements CS243: Discrete Structures First Order Logic, Rules of Inference Işıl Dillig Homework 1 is due now Homework 2 is handed out today Homework 2 is due next Tuesday Işıl Dillig, CS243: Discrete
Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises
Deduction Deductive arguments, deduction, deductive logic all means the same thing. They are different ways of referring to the same style of reasoning Deduction is just one mode of reasoning, but it is
REASONING SYLLOGISM. Subject Predicate Distributed Not Distributed Distributed Distributed
REASONING SYLLOGISM DISTRIBUTION OF THE TERMS The word "Distrlbution" is meant to characterise the ways in which terrns can occur in Categorical Propositions. A Proposition distributes a terrn if it refers
Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion
398 Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Volume 38, Number 3, Summer 1997 Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion S. V. BHAVE Abstract Disjunctive Syllogism,
Revisiting the Socrates Example
Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Building Arguments for Quantified
GOUR MOHAN SACHIN MANDAL MAHAVIDYALAYA DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Academic Plan. Year: 1st Year (Hons) Session:
GOUR MOHAN SACHIN MANDAL MAHAIDYALAYA DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Academic Plan Year: 1st Year (Hons) Session: 2015-2016 Teacher Name: Dr. A. J. Hasan (Principal) Paper Unit Name Sub Unit Name Month NO of
PAPER-I (INDIAN PHILOSOPHY)
Department of Philosophy Vidyanagar College Charashyamdas South 4 Parganas Unit Syllabus for Three-Year B.A. (Honours) Course in Philosophy A Brief Sketch of the Modularized New Syllabi (++) System(009
Questions for Critically Reading an Argument
ARGUMENT Questions for Critically Reading an Argument What claims does the writer make? What kinds and quality of evidence does the writer provide to support the claim? What assumptions underlie the argument,
LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16
LOGIC Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations
The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1
The Appeal to Reason Introductory Logic pt. 1 Argument vs. Argumentation The difference is important as demonstrated by these famous philosophers. The Origins of Logic: (highlights) Aristotle (385-322
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...
The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive
5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions
M05_COI1396_13_E_C05.QXD 11/13/07 8:39 AM age 182 182 CHATER 5 Categorical ropositions Categorical propositions are the fundamental elements, the building blocks of argument, in the classical account of
Syllabus: BA (5 th Sem.)
COURSE TITLE: LOGIC COURSE CODE: PYB 551 UNIT - I 1. Deduction and Induction; Premises and Conclusions 2. Basic Function of Language; Discourse serving multiple functions; types of definition 3. Fallacies
Natural Law Controversy: Three Basic Logical Issues, The;Note
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Natural Law Forum 1-1-1960 Natural Law Controversy: Three Basic Logical Issues, The;Note Roger T. Simonds Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum
The Philosopher s World Cup
The Philosopher s World Cup Monty Python & the Flying Circus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vv3qgagck&feature=related What is an argument? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqfkti6gn9y What is an argument?