Quine on Holism and Underdetermination
|
|
- Alvin Stewart
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quine on Holism and Underdetermination Introduction Quine s paper is called Two Dogmas of Empiricism. (1) What is empiricism? (2) Why care that it has dogmas? Ad (1). See your glossary! Also, what is the contrasting view? It is rationalism, which is not in the glossary. (An overstated or over-drawn difference?) What made empiricism seem desirable? The rise of postulational science in the 19 th century (kinetic theory of matter, Maxwell s electromagnetic fields). The toughest empiricists wanted to eliminate theoretical terms (like the behaviorists in psychology) by defining them in terms of or reducing them to observable terms. Frege s new logic was employed (by the logical empiricists in the first part of the 20 th century) to turn these slogans into precise accounts, but they have not succeeded yet. Popper tried to distinguish real from pseudo-science by the criterion of falsification. The logical empiricists differed from him in two ways. First, they typically thought one could confirm, as well as infirm, a theory. And, second, they tried to demarcate sense from non-sense. A concept or assertion that could not be tied to observation was dismissed as nonsensical or at best (shudder) metaphysical. _ This latter enterprise led to the verification[ist] theory of meaning. Failure of this program is marked in section 5 of Two Dogmas, where Quine calls it reductionism. One popular way to distinguish empiricists from rationalists is their divergent view on the possibility of synthetic a priori knowledge. Here Euclidean geometry was the main prop of rationalists.
2 The general theory of relativity showed that Euclidean geometry (despite Poincaré) was not the geometry of the universe and so not known to be so a priori. (Reichenbach) Pure v. applied geometry. Finally: Einstein s critique of simultaneity seemed to show that real scientific advance could be gotten from thoroughgoing empiricist criticism of metaphysical elements lingering in physical theories. Note: years ago, one might have thought that the sentence: If event e is simultaneous with event f and event f is simultaneous with even g, then even e is simultaneous with event g was analytic. Now, we think it s not well-formed. This is an example (as Duhem foresaw) of a principle that was (nearly) definitional being abandoned for empirical reasons. This leads to wondering whether, even if one could distinguish a class of analytic sentences, the analytic sentences play a distinctive (e.g., a permanent) role in our knowledge. _ This reflection leads to the web of belief view in section 6 of Two Dogmas. Now we re ready for the paper. Section 1. Background for Analyticity Kant s distinction (The predicate is conceptually contained in the subject) is limited to sentences in simple subject-predicate form. That s too limited. A better characterization analytic is true in virtue of meanings and independently of fact. (281) Meaning bifurcates, however. Singular terms have both reference and sense, what they name and what they mean. Else The morning star is the evening star would be as trivial as The morning star is the morning star. General terms, in parallel, have extension and intension. 2
3 But we will not be naïve and think that senses and intensions are things, like references and extensions. We will be sophisticated and ask: when do two distinct terms or sentences have the same meaning (without thinking that there exist things that are meanings for them to have ). So the analytic sentences are, prima facie, those that are truths of logic and those that derive from truths of logic by substituting synonyms for synonyms. An example of the first is: No unmarried man is married. An example of the second is supposed to be: No bachelor is unmarried. Section 2. Definition There are three sorts of definition. 1. Lexicographic relies on pre-existent synonymies, and so can t explain synonymy. 2. Explication Same problem as for lexicographic but in the favored contexts. [Isn t co-extension in these contexts sufficient?] 3. Explicit or Conventional has application limited to formal languages. [Also, for completeness one might mention ostensive and implicit definition, but they do not seem important for the matters at hand.] Section 3. Interchangeability. 1. Interchangeability salva veritate in extensional languages is not sufficient for analyticity. 2. Interchangeability salva veritate in intensional languages containing a necessity operator is sufficient, but necessity presupposes analyticity, according to Quine. 3
4 Section 5. The Verification Theory and Reductionism The verification theory of meaning asserts that "the meaning of a statement is the method of empirically confirming or infirming [disconfirming] it" (292) That is, "statements are synonymous if and only if they are alike in point of method of empirical confirmation or infirmation." (292) This notion of synonymy could be used to define analyticity. But, Quine asks, just "what...is the nature of the relation between a statement and the experiences which contribute to or detract from its confirmation?" (293) He suggests two possibilities. Radical Reductionism: "Every meaningful statement is held to be translatable into a statement (true or false) about immediate experience." (293) Note: it is no longer demanded that there be a term-by-term translation into experiential or "sense-datum" language but rather that sentences as units be so translatable. Carnap, in his Aufbau, tried to turn this slogan into a genuine construction, but failed. He did not even provide a translation for: "Quality Q is at spacetime point (x,y,z,t)". [Counterfactual conditionals seem also to be needed for an adequate translation, but an adequate understanding of (or semantics for) counterfactual conditionals seems to go beyond the resources of a language concerned only with immediate experience. (Nelson Goodman.)] Attenuated Reductionism: "To each [synthetic] statement there is associated a unique range of possible sensory events such that the occurrence of any of them would add to the likelihood of truth of the statement, and there is associated also another unique range of possible sensory events whose occurrence would detract from that likelihood." (295) The root idea here is, according to Q., is "the supposition that each statement, taken in isolation from its fellows, can admit of confirmation or infirmation at all." (295) 4
5 To this "dogma" Quine opposed a generalization of (what we may call) the D- thesis: "[O]ur statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience not individually but only as a corporate body." (295) "The unit of empirical significance is the whole of science." (296) The second dogma (reductionism), acc. to Quine, "clearly supports" the first. "[A]s long as it is taken to be significant in general to speak of the confirmation and infirmation of a statement, it seems significant to speak also of a limiting kind of statement, which is vacuously confirmed, ipso facto, come what may; and such a statement is analytic." (295) Section 6. Empiricism without the Dogmas. Opening paragraph states "web of belief" alternative to foundationalism. Note first use of "underdetermination" (in what seems to be a Duhemian vein). Quine throws down the gauntlet. "Any statement can be held true come what may... Conversely...no statement is immune to revision." (297) Quine seems to be asserting that the above courses of action need not lead to inconsistency. (Laudan will think these very weak claims.) Quine would defend these views by citing a generalized version of the D-thesis (what Curd and Cover call "Quine's global version of holism" in fn. 17 on p. 404). One could define two versions of Global Holism: (1) Quinean Global Holism: Each sentence S "meets experience" only together with a set of sentences which is the whole of science. I.e. There is a set of sentences W (the whole of science) such that for every sentence S there is some experientially determinable statement O such that, if (S & W), then O; but it is not the case that if (S & W'), then O, where W' is any proper subset of W. (2) Moderate Global Holism: Each sentence S "meets experience" only together with some set of sentences G, where G in general 5
6 depends on S. I.e., For every sentence S there is some set of sentences G (but which set G depends on the choice of S) and an experientially determinable statement O such that: if S & G, then O, but it is not the case that if S & G', then O, where G' is any proper subset of G. ** (1) and (2) illustrate the importance of quantifier order. Compare: As either You can fool some of the people all of the time There are some people whom you can fool all the time, or At any time whatsoever, there are some people whom you can fool. That is: (Ex)(t)((Tt & Px) Fxt) vs (t)( Ex)((Tt & Px) Fxt) It may be that the appearance of a crisp distinction between (1) and (2) is deceptive. Suppose Q believed merely that there was no principled way to draw an outer bound excluding some sentences from revision when some hypothesis H was to be tested. Later Quine. In a paper published in 1975 ("On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World" in Erkenntnis 9) Quine wrote: "Science is neither discontinuous nor monolithic. It is variously jointed, and loose in the joints in varying degrees. In the face of a recalcitrant observation we are free to choose what statements to revise and what one to hold fast, and these alternative will disrupt various stretches of scientific theory in various ways, varying in severity. Little is gained by saying that the unit is in principle the whole of science, however defensible that claim may be in a legalistic way." (314-5) Problem: Can simple or direct observation statements really be held true come what may? Quine invokes hallucinations and changing the laws of 6
7 logic. Seems desperate. But suppose that Quine, the incipient naturalist, sees our sensory systems as complex measuring instruments (which have to calibrated, working properly, and in the proper environment). Then Duhem's argument that all experimental (observational) results are "theory-laden" or in need of interpretation can be applied to our sensory systems too. This move is not so desperate. Later Quine. In a paper published in 1975 ("On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World" in Erkenntnis 9) Quine makes the following confusing set of remarks concerning observation statements: "These statements are indeed separately susceptible to tests of observation; and at the same time they do not stand free of theory, for they share much of the vocabulary of the more remotely theoretical statements. They are what link theory to observation, affording theory its empirical content. Now the Duhem thesis still holds, in a somewhat literalistic way, even for these observation statements." (314) Question: Are there really no statements that can't be revised? Putnam s example: Not all statements are true and false. Does this represent a deep insight or the limits of our imaginations? Would it suffice if Quine showed that the class of unrevisable statements is much smaller than hitherto supposed? On p. 298 Quine does subscribe to a version of a "levels' picture of laws that is usually associated with foundationalism. We "posit" objects to induce "a manageable structure into the flux of experience." In turn, the (descriptive or phenomenological) laws ordering the behavior of objects are themselves ordered (or explained) by positing micro-objects (and their attendant laws). Underdetermination: "Total science, mathematical and natural and human, is similarly but more extremely underdetermined by experience. The edge of the system must be kept squared with experience; the rest, with all its elaborate myths or fictions [the various "posits"], has as its objective the simplicity of laws." (298) 7
8 May there not then be equivalent (equally simple, equally well-squared with experience at the edge) yet distinct total systems of science? Quine answers this question affirmatively. Later Quine again: "This holism thesis lends credence to the under-determination theses. If in the face of adverse observations we are free always to choose among various possible adequate modifications of our theory, then presumably all possible observations are insufficient to determine theory uniquely." ("On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World" in Erkenntnis 9, p. 313) What does 'adequate' mean? What justifies its use in this argument? 8
Phil/Ling 375: Meaning and Mind [Handout #10]
Phil/Ling 375: Meaning and Mind [Handout #10] W. V. Quine: Two Dogmas of Empiricism Professor JeeLoo Liu Main Theses 1. Anti-analytic/synthetic divide: The belief in the divide between analytic and synthetic
More informationAnalyticity, Reductionism, and Semantic Holism. The verification theory is an empirical theory of meaning which asserts that the meaning of a
24.251: Philosophy of Language Paper 1: W.V.O. Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism 14 October 2011 Analyticity, Reductionism, and Semantic Holism The verification theory is an empirical theory of meaning which
More informationQuine on the analytic/synthetic distinction
Quine on the analytic/synthetic distinction Jeff Speaks March 14, 2005 1 Analyticity and synonymy.............................. 1 2 Synonymy and definition ( 2)............................ 2 3 Synonymy
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE QUNE S TWO DOGMAS OF EMPIRICISM LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Why We Want an A/S Distinction The Two Projects of the Two Dogmas The Significance of Quine s Two Dogmas Negative Project:
More informationOverview. Is there a priori knowledge? No: Mill, Quine. Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? Yes: faculty of a priori intuition (Rationalism, Kant)
Overview Is there a priori knowledge? Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? No: Mill, Quine Yes: faculty of a priori intuition (Rationalism, Kant) No: all a priori knowledge analytic (Ayer) No A Priori
More informationON QUINE, ANALYTICITY, AND MEANING Wylie Breckenridge
ON QUINE, ANALYTICITY, AND MEANING Wylie Breckenridge In sections 5 and 6 of "Two Dogmas" Quine uses holism to argue against there being an analytic-synthetic distinction (ASD). McDermott (2000) claims
More informationWILLARD VAN ORMAN QUINE
WILLARD VAN ORMAN QUINE The philosopher s task differs from the others in detail, but in no such drastic way as those suppose who imagine for the philosopher a vantage point outside the conceptual scheme
More informationIn Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Book Reviews 1 In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xiv + 232. H/b 37.50, $54.95, P/b 13.95,
More informationConstructing the World, Lecture 4 Revisability and Conceptual Change: Carnap vs. Quine David Chalmers
Constructing the World, Lecture 4 Revisability and Conceptual Change: Carnap vs. Quine David Chalmers Text: http://consc.net/oxford/. E-mail: chalmers@anu.edu.au. Discussion meeting: Thursdays 10:45-12:45,
More informationA Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic?
A Priori Knowledge: Analytic? Synthetic A Priori (again) Is All A Priori Knowledge Analytic? Recap A Priori Knowledge Knowledge independent of experience Kant: necessary and universal A Posteriori Knowledge
More informationClass #19: November 1 Two Dogmas of Empiricism
Philosophy 405: Knowledge, Truth and Mathematics Fall 2010 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #19: November 1 Two Dogmas of Empiricism I. Two Dogmas, Mathematics, and Indispensability Our interest in
More informationThe Philosophy of Language. Quine versus Meaning
The Philosophy of Language Lecture Six Quine versus Meaning Rob Trueman rob.trueman@york.ac.uk University of York 1 / 71 Introduction Quine versus Meaning Introduction Verificationism The Self-Undermining
More informationDefending A Dogma: Between Grice, Strawson and Quine
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 35-44 ISSN: 2333-5750 (Print), 2333-5769 (Online) Copyright The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. American Research Institute
More informationAyer and Quine on the a priori
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
More informationConceptual Analysis meets Two Dogmas of Empiricism David Chalmers (RSSS, ANU) Handout for Australasian Association of Philosophy, July 4, 2006
Conceptual Analysis meets Two Dogmas of Empiricism David Chalmers (RSSS, ANU) Handout for Australasian Association of Philosophy, July 4, 2006 1. Two Dogmas of Empiricism The two dogmas are (i) belief
More informationCHAPTER IV NON-EMPIRICAL CRITIQUE OF A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI
CHAPTER IV NON-EMPIRICAL CRITIQUE OF A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI Introduction Empiricism, both in its classical and modern forms, gives importance to sense- experience. What is not obtained by senseexperience
More informationPreserving Normativity in Epistemology: Quine s Thesis Revisited
Master of Arts Research Essay 2011 Preserving Normativity in Epistemology: Quine s Thesis Revisited Dioné Harley Supervisor: Prof Mark Leon The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation
More informationOn Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. by Christian Green
On Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction by Christian Green Evidently such a position of extreme skepticism about a distinction is not in general justified merely by criticisms,
More informationNaturalized Epistemology. 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? Quine PY4613
Naturalized Epistemology Quine PY4613 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? a. How is it motivated? b. What are its doctrines? c. Naturalized Epistemology in the context of Quine s philosophy 2. Naturalized
More informationDumitrescu Bogdan Andrei - The incompatibility of analytic statements with Quine s universal revisability
Dumitrescu Bogdan Andrei - The incompatibility of analytic statements with Quine s universal revisability Abstract: This very brief essay is concerned with Grice and Strawson s article In Defense of a
More information145 Philosophy of Science
Logical empiricism Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 145 Philosophy of Science Vienna Circle (Ernst Mach Society) Hans Hahn, Otto Neurath, and Philipp Frank regularly meet
More informationJeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University,
The Negative Role of Empirical Stimulus in Theory Change: W. V. Quine and P. Feyerabend Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University, 1 To all Participants
More informationthe aim is to specify the structure of the world in the form of certain basic truths from which all truths can be derived. (xviii)
PHIL 5983: Naturalness and Fundamentality Seminar Prof. Funkhouser Spring 2017 Week 8: Chalmers, Constructing the World Notes (Introduction, Chapters 1-2) Introduction * We are introduced to the ideas
More information- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is
BonJour I PHIL410 BonJour s Moderate Rationalism - BonJour develops and defends a moderate form of Rationalism. - Rationalism, generally (as used here), is the view according to which the primary tool
More informationConventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth
1 Conventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth 1.1 Introduction Quine s work on analyticity, translation, and reference has sweeping philosophical implications. In his first important philosophical
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE Now, it is a defect of [natural] languages that expressions are possible within them, which, in their grammatical form, seemingly determined to designate
More informationCory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010).
Cory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010). Reviewed by Viorel Ţuţui 1 Since it was introduced by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, the analytic synthetic distinction had
More informationVerificationism. PHIL September 27, 2011
Verificationism PHIL 83104 September 27, 2011 1. The critique of metaphysics... 1 2. Observation statements... 2 3. In principle verifiability... 3 4. Strong verifiability... 3 4.1. Conclusive verifiability
More informationUNITY OF KNOWLEDGE (IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY) Vol. I - Philosophical Holism M.Esfeld
PHILOSOPHICAL HOLISM M. Esfeld Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, Germany Keywords: atomism, confirmation, holism, inferential role semantics, meaning, monism, ontological dependence, rule-following,
More informationMY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A
I Holistic Pragmatism and the Philosophy of Culture MY PURPOSE IN THIS BOOK IS TO PRESENT A philosophical discussion of the main elements of civilization or culture such as science, law, religion, politics,
More informationDAVIDSON AND CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES PAUL BROADBENT. A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY
DAVIDSON AND CONCEPTUAL SCHEMES by PAUL BROADBENT A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Law The University
More informationPhilosophy 308 The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2014
Philosophy 308 The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2014 Class #14 The Picture Theory of Language and the Verification Theory of Meaning Wittgenstein, Ayer, and Hempel Marcus,
More informationClass 4 - The Myth of the Given
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 4 - The Myth of the Given I. Atomism and Analysis In our last class, on logical empiricism, we saw that Wittgenstein
More informationLANGUAGE, TRUTH, AND LOGIC A.J. AYER
LANGUAGE, TRUTH, AND LOGIC A.J. AYER Where do Ayer and Russell agree? All ordinary things can be reduced to (constructed out of) sense data. This is accomplished by translating empirical statements into
More informationPrimitive Concepts. David J. Chalmers
Primitive Concepts David J. Chalmers Conceptual Analysis: A Traditional View A traditional view: Most ordinary concepts (or expressions) can be defined in terms of other more basic concepts (or expressions)
More informationCarnap s notion of analyticity and the two wings of analytic philosophy. Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle
Carnap s notion of analyticity and the two wings of analytic philosophy Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle christian.damboeck@univie.ac.at From Kant to Quine 12/11/2015 Christian Damböck - Helsinki
More informationAyer on the criterion of verifiability
Ayer on the criterion of verifiability November 19, 2004 1 The critique of metaphysics............................. 1 2 Observation statements............................... 2 3 In principle verifiability...............................
More informationAyer s linguistic theory of the a priori
Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori phil 43904 Jeff Speaks December 4, 2007 1 The problem of a priori knowledge....................... 1 2 Necessity and the a priori............................ 2
More informationPhilosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011
Philosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011 Class 4 The Myth of the Given Marcus, Intuitions and Philosophy, Fall 2011, Slide 1 Atomism and Analysis P Wittgenstein
More informationEver since W. V. O. Quine wrote his famous Two Dogmas of
Aporia vol. 22 no. 1 2012 Redeeming Analyticity Shae McPhee Ever since W. V. O. Quine wrote his famous Two Dogmas of Empiricism, it seems that philosophers have shied away from the notion of analyticity.
More informationLogical Content and Empirical Significance
Logical Content and Empirical Significance From The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy, ed. by Paul Weingartner, G. Schurz and G. Dorn, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien Ken Gemes Department of Philosophy
More informationThe Coherence of Kant s Synthetic A Priori
The Coherence of Kant s Synthetic A Priori Simon Marcus October 2009 Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? The question can be rephrased as Sellars puts it: Are there any universal propositions which,
More informationOverview. The Varieties of Conventionalism
1 Overview The Varieties of Conventionalism This book recounts the hitherto untold story of conventionalism. The profound impact conventionalism has had on seminal developments in both the science and
More informationPhilosophy of Mathematics Kant
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
More informationLENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN
LENT 2018 THEORY OF MEANING DR MAARTEN STEENHAGEN HTTP://MSTEENHAGEN.GITHUB.IO/TEACHING/2018TOM THE EINSTEIN-BERGSON DEBATE SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein met on the 6th of
More informationConstructing the World
Constructing the World Lecture 1: A Scrutable World David Chalmers Plan *1. Laplace s demon 2. Primitive concepts and the Aufbau 3. Problems for the Aufbau 4. The scrutability base 5. Applications Laplace
More informationWHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.
WHAT IS HUME S FORK? www.prshockley.org Certainty does not exist in science. I. Introduction: A. Hume divides all objects of human reason into two different kinds: Relation of Ideas & Matters of Fact.
More informationAlan W. Richardson s Carnap s Construction of the World
Alan W. Richardson s Carnap s Construction of the World Gabriella Crocco To cite this version: Gabriella Crocco. Alan W. Richardson s Carnap s Construction of the World. Erkenntnis, Springer Verlag, 2000,
More informationLOGIC AND ANALYTICITY. Tyler BURGE University of California at Los Angeles
Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (2003), 199 249. LOGIC AND ANALYTICITY Tyler BURGE University of California at Los Angeles Summary The view that logic is true independently of a subject matter is criticized
More information1 What is conceptual analysis and what is the problem?
1 What is conceptual analysis and what is the problem? 1.1 What is conceptual analysis? In this book, I am going to defend the viability of conceptual analysis as a philosophical method. It therefore seems
More informationLecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability
Lecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Two concepts of probability Example 1 You know that a coin is either two-headed or two-tailed but you have no information
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationRemarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays
Bernays Project: Text No. 26 Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays (Bemerkungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik) Translation by: Dirk Schlimm Comments: With corrections by Charles
More informationEpistemology Naturalized
Epistemology Naturalized Christian Wüthrich http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/wuthrich/ 15 Introduction to Philosophy: Theory of Knowledge Spring 2010 The Big Picture Thesis (Naturalism) Naturalism maintains
More informationBoghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori
Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori PHIL 83104 November 2, 2011 Both Boghossian and Harman address themselves to the question of whether our a priori knowledge can be explained in
More informationQUINE AND DAVIDSON ON OBSERVATION SENTENCES
QUINE AND DAVIDSON ON OBSERVATION SENTENCES MIKHAIL MASOKIN B.A., Rostov-on-Don State University, 1990 Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the
More informationWorld without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.
Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and
More informationRevelation, Humility, and the Structure of the World. David J. Chalmers
Revelation, Humility, and the Structure of the World David J. Chalmers Revelation and Humility Revelation holds for a property P iff Possessing the concept of P enables us to know what property P is Humility
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationPutnam on Methods of Inquiry
Putnam on Methods of Inquiry Indiana University, Bloomington Abstract Hilary Putnam s paradigm-changing clarifications of our methods of inquiry in science and everyday life are central to his philosophy.
More informationTHE IDEA OF A PRIORI REVISITED* SANJIT CHAKRABORTY
THE IDEA OF A PRIORI REVISITED* SANJIT CHAKRABORTY ABSTRACT: In this article I would like to discuss the concept of a priori mainly focusing on Kant s Copernican revolution. How is metaphysics at all possible
More informationReply to Robert Koons
632 Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Volume 35, Number 4, Fall 1994 Reply to Robert Koons ANIL GUPTA and NUEL BELNAP We are grateful to Professor Robert Koons for his excellent, and generous, review
More informationIndeterminacy, A Priority, and Analyticity in the Quinean Critique
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00340.x Indeterminacy, A Priority, and Analyticity in the Quinean Critique Gurpreet Rattan Abstract: Significant issues remain for understanding and evaluating the Quinean
More informationPHILOSOPHY EPISTEMOLOGY ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS
PHILOSOPHY 5340 - EPISTEMOLOGY ESSAY TOPICS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS 1. As is indicated in the syllabus, the required work for the course can take the form either of two shorter essay-writing exercises,
More informationETHOS: Felsefe ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar // Sayı: 4 (1) Ocak 2011
HOLISM AND THE ANALYTIC-SYNTHETIC DISTINCTION [Bütüncülük ve Analitik-Sentetik Ayrımı] Pakize Arıkan Sandıkçıoğlu * ABSTRACT In his famous work Two Dogmas of Empiricism Quine offers a strong and influential
More informationPH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning
DEREE COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR: PH 3118 THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE (previously PH 2118) (Updated SPRING 2016) PREREQUISITES: CATALOG DESCRIPTION: RATIONALE: LEARNING OUTCOMES: METHOD OF TEACHING AND LEARNING: UK
More informationIN his renowned article, On the Very Idea of a Conceptual
Aporia Vol. 15 number 1 2005 Hacking Davidson TIMOTHY OTCHY IN his renowned article, On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme, Donald Davidson argues against the logical possibility of conceptual schemes.
More informationOn Quine s Ontology: quantification, extensionality and naturalism (from commitment to indifference)
On Quine s Ontology: quantification, extensionality and naturalism (from commitment to indifference) Daniel Durante Pereira Alves durante@ufrnet.br January 2015 Abstract Much of the ontology made in the
More informationVarieties of Apriority
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
More informationTwo Dogmas of Analytical Philosophy
Macalester Journal of Philosophy Volume 16 Spring 2007 Issue 1 Spring 2007 Article 5 5-1-2007 Two Dogmas of Analytical Philosophy Greg Taylor Macalester College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo
More informationPhilosophical Review.
Philosophical Review In Defense of a Dogma Author(s): H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson Source: The Philosophical Review, Vol. 65, No. 2 (Apr., 1956), pp. 141-158 Published by: Duke University Press on behalf
More informationAlthough Quine is widely known as an influential critic of logical positivism, there is now a
IS QUINE A VERIFICATIONIST? Panu Raatikainen I Although Quine is widely known as an influential critic of logical positivism, there is now a growing tendency to emphasize the similarities between him and
More informationAn A Posteriori Conception of Analyticity? Grazer Philosophische Studien 66, 2003, pp
An A Posteriori Conception of Analyticity? Grazer Philosophische Studien 66, 2003, pp. 119-139 Åsa Maria Wikforss Stockholm University asa.wikforss@philosophy.su.se 1 An A Posteriori Conception of Analyticity?
More informationOn Naturalism in Mathematics
On Naturalism in Mathematics Alfred Lundberg Bachelor s Thesis, Spring 2007 Supervison: Christian Bennet Department of Philosophy Göteborg University 1 Contents Contents...2 Introduction... 3 Naïve Questions...
More informationAnalyticity and Holism in Quine's Thought Peter Hylton
Analyticity and Holism in Quine's Thought Peter Hylton This essay is based on a talk that Ifirstgave at a conference in honour of the memory of my teacher, the late Burton Dreben, who taught at Harvard
More information37. The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction
37. The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction There s a danger in not saying anything conclusive about these matters. Your hero, despite all his talk about having the courage to question presuppositions, doesn
More informationCLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
More informationTwentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy by Avrum Stroll
Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy by Avrum Stroll Columbia University Press: New York, 2000. 302pp, Hardcover, $32.50. Brad Majors University of Kansas The history of analytic philosophy is a troubled
More informationMEANING WITHOUT ANALYTICITY H.G. CALLAWAY
MEANING WITHOUT ANALYTICITY H.G. CALLAWAY In a series of interesting and influential papers on semantics, Hilary Putnam has developed what he calls a "post-verificationist meaning.( Putnam defends a limited
More informationQuine and the a priori
To be published in A Companion to W.V.O. Quine, edited by Gilbert Harman and Ernie Lepore (John Wiley & Sons.) Lars Bergström Quine and the a priori Roughly speaking, a priori knowledge is knowledge that
More informationJunior Research Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy Worcester College, University of Oxford Walton Street Oxford OX1 2HB Great Britain
Essay Title: Author: Meaning (verification theory) Markus Schrenk Junior Research Fellow and Lecturer in Philosophy Worcester College, University of Oxford Walton Street Oxford OX1 2HB Great Britain ESSAY
More informationIssue 4, Special Conference Proceedings Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society
Issue 4, Special Conference Proceedings 2017 Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society An Alternative Approach to Mathematical Ontology Amber Donovan (Durham University) Introduction
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH
PHILOSOPHICAL RAMIFICATIONS: THEORY, EXPERIMENT, & EMPIRICAL TRUTH PCES 3.42 Even before Newton published his revolutionary work, philosophers had already been trying to come to grips with the questions
More informationTHE REFUTATION OF PHENOMENALISM
The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library THE REFUTATION OF PHENOMENALISM A draft of section I of Empirical Propositions and Hypothetical Statements 1 The rights and wrongs of phenomenalism are perhaps more frequently
More informationCRITIQUE OF THE ANALYTIC/SYNTHETIC DISTINCTION. by Marty Fields
IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 2, Number 36, September 4 to September 10, 2000 Introduction CRITIQUE OF THE ANALYTIC/SYNTHETIC DISTINCTION by Marty Fields To any student of the history of philosophy it becomes
More informationAn Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Bruce Aune
An Empiricist Theory of Knowledge Bruce Aune Copyright 2008 Bruce Aune To Anne ii CONTENTS PREFACE iv Chapter One: WHAT IS KNOWLEDGE? Conceptions of Knowing 1 Epistemic Contextualism 4 Lewis s Contextualism
More informationTuomas E. Tahko (University of Helsinki)
Meta-metaphysics Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, forthcoming in October 2018 Tuomas E. Tahko (University of Helsinki) tuomas.tahko@helsinki.fi www.ttahko.net Article Summary Meta-metaphysics concerns
More informationRelativism and Indeterminacy of Meaning (Quine) Indeterminacy of Translation
Relativism and Indeterminacy of Meaning (Quine) Indeterminacy of Translation Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk Churchill and Newnham, Cambridge 9/10/18 Talk outline Quine Radical Translation Indeterminacy
More informationQuine and the Vienna Circle
DELFIM SANTOS STUDIES ANO 1, NÚM. 1 2013 Quine and the Vienna Circle Rui Silva Carnap was my greatest teacher ( ). I was very much his disciple for six years. In later years his views went on evolving
More informationNaturalism: Friends and Foes. These days, it seems there are at least as many strains of
Naturalism: Friends and Foes These days, it seems there are at least as many strains of naturalism as there are self-professed naturalistic philosophers. My personal favorite has its primary roots in Quine,
More informationCh V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?]
Part II: Schools in Contemporary Philosophy Ch V: The Vienna Circle (Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, and Otto Neurath)[title crossed out?] 1. The positivists of the nineteenth century, men like Mach and
More informationQuine and Epistemology 1
Final version will appear in Gilbert Harman and Ernest Lepore (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Quine. Quine and Epistemology 1 Thomas Kelly Princeton University For Quine, as for many canonical philosophers
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationQUINE vs. QUINE: Abstract Knowledge and Ontology
QUINE vs. QUINE: Abstract Knowledge and Ontology Gila Sher How does Quine, one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century, fare in the first decades of the twenty-first century? It appears
More informationPhilosophy of Mathematics Nominalism
Philosophy of Mathematics Nominalism Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk Churchill and Newnham, Cambridge 8/11/18 Last week Ante rem structuralism accepts mathematical structures as Platonic universals. We
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationApriority in Naturalized Epistemology: Investigation into a Modern Defense
Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 11-28-2007 Apriority in Naturalized Epistemology: Investigation into a Modern Defense Jesse Giles
More informationBertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1
Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide
More informationIntro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary
Critical Realism & Philosophy Webinar Ruth Groff August 5, 2015 Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary You don t have to become a philosopher, but just as philosophers should know their way around
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
More information