Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1
|
|
- Dylan Howard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1 Critique of Walter Lippmann s Indispensable Opposition Melia Young October 31, 2013 Heidi Barker
2 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 2 Critique of Walter Lippmann s Indispensable Opposition Summary In his article, The Indispensable Opposition, Walter Lippmann (2012), a Pulitzer Prizewinning journalist, explores the need for opposition to produce complete freedom of truth. This includes the need to accept and internalize others opinions. In many instances, people have difficulty accepting any opinion except their own; when they listen, it is with an air of forbearance rather than contemplation. This is a mistake that is not conducive to finding the truth, because in order to achieve truth it is important to discuss, even to argue. Opposition is necessary if progression is desired, for without opposition discussion does not happen and any hope of moving forward is vanquished. Discussion does not always produce the complete truth or even any truth at all, but it is the only way by which any truth can be arrived at. Finding truth is at the heart of freedom. Therefore, in order to embrace liberty discussion and finding truth must be accepted and understood. A government or dictatorship that surrounds itself with uniform thinkers gradually turns away from a desire for truth. Sometimes finding the truth requires change, and in order for change to happen opinions must be voiced to an audience. If no one hears an opinion, discussion cannot take place. Discussion is a large part of political liberty, and liberty is the key to unlocking truth. The preservation of that liberty is dependent on the individual. Lippmann concludes by once again advocating the need for opposition. It is indispensable (p. 5). Ambiguity In his essay, The Indispensable Opposition, Lippmann uses very little ambiguity as he informs the reader exactly what his opinion is, and why it is so. He is careful to include definitions or at least clarifications on words or ideas that may need expansion. He does use
3 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 3 a slight ambiguity when he talks about freedom. This is an intentional ambiguity however, as he explains that people see freedom in many different ways. In Browne and Keeleys (2012) Asking the Right Questions, they expound on intentional ambiguity: Ambiguity is not always an accident. Those trying to persuade you are quite often aware that words have multiple meanings (p. 48). Intentional ambiguity usually carries a negative connotation, but Lippmann only uses it for a moment. The confusion that the reader may have lasts less than a paragraph, as Lippmann gives several examples of what people may view freedom as. In short, the amount of ambiguity used is very low. Lippmann is careful to always say exactly what he means. He writes logically and clearly, providing examples and definitions when needed. In a persuasive article like Lippmann s, it is very easy and possibly tempting to use ambiguity. When trying to convince a reader of something, many writers prefer to use loaded and ambiguous language. It is the mark of a trustworthy author when as little ambiguity as possible is used. Lippmann shows his honesty in his article, relying merely on the merit of his argument to persuade readers to his point of view. His lack of ambiguity makes his point of view clear and strong. He leaves the readers in to doubt as to what his opinions on political freedom are. Assumptions One of the biggest assumptions that Lippmann makes is that the reader is an advocate of freedom. But as most people reading his article will likely be those who love and cherish freedom, this is an acceptable assumption. There are other, smaller assumptions, such as the reader will understand what true political freedom is, or what Lippmann defines it as. Or that the reader is someone who is capable of discussion. Some people may not be able to convey their meaning in an assertive way. Asking the Right Questions emphasizes the impact assumptions
4 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 4 can have on both the reader and the article: Hidden or unstated beliefs may be at least as significant in understanding the argument (Browne & Keeley, 2012, p. 55). Lippmann is extremely careful to keep any hidden meanings out of his article. For instance, he could have assumed that his readers would be political gurus who understand a particular jargon, or that everyone will be in favor of opposition, or discussion. Lippmann writes for the layman in such a way that most everyone who reads his article will be able to understand it and come away with their own opinion, whether they agree with him or not. Assumptions can reduce understanding and even recognition of important points in an article. In escaping the common mistake of making assumptions, Lippmann creates an article that is principled and worthwhile. One can read it with a confidence that he is honest in his opinion and trusts the reader to form their own. It is no small feat to write an article that can be comprehended by nearly all who read it. Lippmann s lack of assumptions is an impressive testament to his writing abilities. Fallacies Lippmann is quite scrupulous when dealing with fallacies. In the second paragraph, Lippmann (2012) appears to commit a small either-or fallacy. He states that if one man disagrees enough with what another man is saying, he will try to suppress that man (p.1). He assumes that there are only two possible outcomes; either the men will agree, or they will disagree and one will try to overcome the other. In reality, there are several different situations that might arise from such a dilemma. However, Lippmann is generalizing merely for the sake of rhetoric, and it does not affect his argument. Browne and Keeley (2012) define an either-or fallacy as assuming only two alternatives when there are more than two (p. 82). They attempt to educate their reader as they expound on the several and varying types of fallacies a writer can
5 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 5 commit. In order to be able to determine what those fallacies are and where they occur, one must develop the skill of critical reading. the objective of critical reading and listening is to judge the acceptability or worth of conclusions (p. 73). It is essential to be able to identify fallacies wherever they may occur. Lippmann could have committed several fallacies in his article, which he fastidiously avoids. He could have attacked political individuals who may not seem to revere political freedom; he could have appealed to popularity by using over-the-top examples with prominent public issues to convince readers to agree with him. Lippmann avoids all such fallacies and merely states his beliefs and the reasons and logic behind them. By so doing, he constructs an article that is credible and frank. Evidence The evidence that Lippmann uses is mainly opinion-based. He is not writing to impart factual information, but rather to expound his personal views regarding the subject of political freedom. As a result of this, his article is mainly an emotional one, though the use of emotion is appropriate because of his topic. With any topic that does not have one definitive answer that is irrefutable, emotion and opinion must be involved as a large part of the discussion. Even though Lippmann s article doesn t include several researched resources, his logic is such that the reader needn t harbor doubts pertaining to his credibility. His evidence takes the form of examples and scenarios that are relatable to a general audience so that the reader can easily see the point he is trying to make. While he doesn t necessarily quote different authors and scholars, Lippmann steers away from personal experience as a form of evidence. Browne and Keeley (2012) advise readers to be wary of personal experience. They state that a single personal experience, or even an
6 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 6 accumulation of personal experiences, is not enough to give you a representative sample of experiences, personal experiences often lead us to commit the hasty generalization fallacy (p. 97). Offering personal experience as a form of evidence is not generally acceptable as concrete fact. Lippmann recognizes this and offers logic in place of personal experience. His argument stands on its own, without adding the ideas and thoughts of well-known scholars. He relies solely on his own thoughts and feelings, giving his article a personal feel. The reader is given a glimpse into Lippmann s personal and occasionally quite forceful views. Conclusion Lippmann does a remarkable job in abstaining from making those mistakes that many authors struggle with. Because of this, he can write with the confidence of persuading or at least informing his readers about what he feels to be true political freedom: the freedom of discussion. He writes with clarity that lends credibility and strength to his argument. He offers his opinion and invites the readers to make up their minds about whether or not they agree. In that way, he captures the very essence of his topic: progress occurs when discussion takes place and personal opinions can be formed without any bias. (1,469)
7 CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 7 References Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (10th ed.). Boston, United States: Pearson. Lippmann, W. (2012). The indispensable opposition. In R. Seamons (Ed.), The way of wisdom (2nd ed., pp ). Rexburg, ID: BYU-I. (Original work published 1939)
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing
Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim
More informationAsking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley A Decision Making and Support Systems Perspective by Richard Day M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley look to change
More informationHumanizing the Future
Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Student Publications 2014 Humanizing the Future Jessica Evanoff Cedarville University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/student_publications
More informationFROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS
FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR READERS INFLUENCES HOW YOU SEE A PARTICULAR SITUATION DEFINE AN ISSUE EXPLAIN THE ONGOING
More informationThe Relationship between Rhetoric and Truth. Plato tells us that oratory is the art of enchanting the soul (Phaedrus).
Samantha Weiss 21W.747 Rhetoric Aden Evens A1D The Relationship between Rhetoric and Truth Plato tells us that oratory is the art of enchanting the soul (Phaedrus). In his piece, Phaedrus, the character
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More information2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1
Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It
More informationWriting Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)
Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques
More informationThe Critique (analyzing an essay s argument)
The Critique (analyzing an essay s argument) The Assignment: Write a critique of the essay that you summarized. Unless you come up with a different structure (please see me if you have a specific plan),
More informationI. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.
Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem
More informationHANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13
1 HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Argument Recognition 2 II. Argument Analysis 3 1. Identify Important Ideas 3 2. Identify Argumentative Role of These Ideas 4 3. Identify Inferences 5 4. Reconstruct the
More informationI would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook.
Hello once again! Essay Assignment 1 I would like to give you some suggestions now that should help you as you are working on Essay Assignment 1. This presentation is somewhat long, but the information
More informationWhat an argument is not
Expectations: As you go through this information on argumentation, you need to take notes in some fashion. You may simply print this document and bring it with you to class. You may also take notes like
More informationCHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.
Logos Ethos Pathos Chapter 13 CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior. Persuasive speaking: process of doing so in
More informationWriting a Persuasive Essay
Writing a Persuasive Essay First Steps Develop essential questions surrounding your topic! Research! Articles from credible Internet sources, books, journals, magazines, etc. Evidence Evidence should support
More informationLetter from Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis. Luis Audelio Unzueta. The University of Texas at El Paso
Running head: LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM ANALYSIS 1 Letter from Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis Luis Audelio Unzueta The University of Texas at El Paso LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM ANALYSIS 2 During the civil
More informationArgumentative Writing
Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that
More informationStory Versus Essay: The Particular Feud of Universal Virtue. As Plato once cogitated, If particulars are to have meaning, there must be universals.
Eric Corona Miss Larsen TA Inklings Online, Section I Term Paper IV Final Draft May 19, 2009 Word count: 1,763 Story Versus Essay: The Particular Feud of Universal Virtue As Plato once cogitated, If particulars
More informationExplanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point
Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or
More informationAdapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument
Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis
More informationConclusions are only Partial Truths. Plato tells us that oratory is the art of enchanting the soul (Phaedrus). In his piece,
Samantha Weiss 21W.747 Rhetoric Aden Evens A1R Conclusions are only Partial Truths Plato tells us that oratory is the art of enchanting the soul (Phaedrus). In his piece, Phaedrus, the character Socrates
More informationCommon Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies Effective arguments rely on logic and facts for support, yet speakers and authors, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can mislead an audience with a flaw in reasoning. Readers
More informationArgumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4
Argumentative Writing 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Unit Objectives IWBAT - Write an argumentative essay that supports claims in an analysis of a topic and uses valid reasoning,
More informationArgument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job
Argument Writing Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job promotion as well as political and personal decision-making
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationWorld-Wide Ethics. Chapter One. Individual Subjectivism
World-Wide Ethics Chapter One Individual Subjectivism To some people it seems very enlightened to think that in areas like morality, and in values generally, everyone must find their own truths. Most of
More informationby Joshua E. Hummer, Esq. and Dr. Jill A. Hummer, Ph.D. Workbook
by Joshua E. Hummer, Esq. and Dr. Jill A. Hummer, Ph.D. Workbook 2 Persuasive Writing and Classical Rhetoric Table of Contents Lesson 1: Persuasive Writing and Classical Rhetoric... 4 Lesson 2: The Habits
More informationChecking Your Arguments
Checking Your Arguments There are two ways of checking the significance and logical validity of your arguments. One is a "positive" check, making sure your essay includes certain specific features, and
More informationAnnotated Works Consulted
Annotated Works Consulted Step One Find the sources Tip: Find more than 12 sources, because some may not be as informative or ontopic as they first appear. Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder
More informationThe Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing
The Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing This PowerPoint is the property of Humber College s Writing Centre and cannot be reproduced without the consent of the Writing Centre - 2016 WRITING TUTORS
More informationHow persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)
How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very) NIU should require all students to pass a comprehensive exam in order to graduate because such exams have been shown to be effective for improving
More informationOverview: Application: What to Avoid:
UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,
More informationFigures removed due to copyright restrictions.
Lincoln/Douglas Debate Figures removed due to copyright restrictions. Debating is like Fencing Thrust Making assertions backed by evidence Parry R f Refuting opponents assertions Burden of Proof In a formal
More informationEverything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument
Everything s An Argument Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument Arguments to Inform Convince Explore Make Decisions Meditate/Pray Arguments to INFORM Presenting specific information to inform readers Example:
More information14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S
14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common
More informationRhetorical Appeals: The Available Means of Persuasion
Rhetorical Appeals: The Available Means of Persuasion Aristotle defined Rhetoric as the available means of persuasion. But what are these available means? Think about it this way: what are the various
More informationCritical Thinking Questions
Critical Thinking Questions (partially adapted from the questions listed in The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking by Richard Paul and Linda Elder) The following questions can be used in two ways: to
More informationThis handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your philosophy papers.
The Writing Center Philosophy Like 2 people like this. What this handout is about This handout discusses common types of philosophy assignments and strategies and resources that will help you write your
More informationHANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
More informationAP SEMINAR: End- of- Course Exam SAMPLE RESPONSES SECTION I: PART A. The Uncertainty of Science, by Richard Feynman
SECTION I: PART A The Uncertainty of Science, by Richard Feynman Question 1 (3 pts): Identify the author s argument, main idea, or thesis. The author s argument is that we should not fear doubt; we should
More informationEffective Academic Writing: The Argument
THE WRITING CENTER Academic Services Phone: 962-7710 www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/ Effective Academic Writing: The Argument What this handout is about... This handout will define what an argument is and why
More informationThe SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy
The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always
More informationInstructor s Manual 1
Instructor s Manual 1 PREFACE This instructor s manual will help instructors prepare to teach logic using the 14th edition of Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, and Kenneth McMahon s Introduction to Logic. The
More informationGrab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC
Grab an Everything s an Argument book off the shelf by the flags. INTRO TO RHETORIC Everything is an Argument You are bombarded with them all the time! The average American sees over 3000 advertisements
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
More informationViolent Media Is Good For Gerard Jones. career in writing comic books and action movies (200). His claims about the effects violent
Day 1 Lacey Day Instructor Roddy English 102 29 January 2016 Violent Media Is Good For Gerard Jones Gerard Jones is a man who has lived a life closely tied to violent media, with a successful career in
More informationKant On The A Priority of Space: A Critique Arjun Sawhney - The University of Toronto pp. 4-7
Issue 1 Spring 2016 Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy Kant On The A Priority of Space: A Critique Arjun Sawhney - The University of Toronto pp. 4-7 For details of submission dates and guidelines please
More informationAICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2
AICE Thinking kills Review How to Master Paper 2 Important Things to Remember You are given 1 hour and 45 minutes for Paper 2 You should spend approximately 30 minutes on each question Write neatly! Read
More informationChapter 2. Moral Reasoning. Chapter Overview. Learning Objectives. Teaching Suggestions
Chapter 2 Moral Reasoning Chapter Overview This chapter provides students with the tools necessary for analyzing and constructing moral arguments. It also builds on Chapter 1 by encouraging students to
More informationCritical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
More informationTeaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018
Teaching Argument Blanqui Valledor SURN April 20, 2018 Introducing Argument Amy s Murder Discussion Who Dunnit? Persuasion versus Argument Subtle, but Significant differences between.. The Goals: Persuasive
More informationTHE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING
THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING SEVENTH EDITION JOHN D. RAMAGE, JOHN C. BEAN, AND JUNE JOHNSON PART 2: WRITING PROJECTS CHAPTER 13 WRITING A CLASSICAL ARGUMENT Chapter 13 Learning Objectives In this
More informationSome Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.
Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches
More informationThe Art of Speaking. Methods of Persuasion and Rhetorical Devices
The Art of Speaking Methods of Persuasion and Rhetorical Devices Objective Having listened to a lecture on persuasive rhetoric, students will demonstrate an understanding of its elements as shown by the
More informationAquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language
Aquinas Cosmological argument in everyday language P1. If there is no first cause, there cannot be any effects. P2. But we have observed that there are effects, like observing change in the world. C: So
More informationPearson myworld Geography Western Hemisphere 2011
A Correlation of Pearson Western Hemisphere 2011 Table of Contents Reading Standards for... 3 Writing Standards for... 9 A Correlation of, Reading Standards for Key Ideas and Details RH.6-8.1. Cite specific
More informationpart one MACROSTRUCTURE Cambridge University Press X - A Theory of Argument Mark Vorobej Excerpt More information
part one MACROSTRUCTURE 1 Arguments 1.1 Authors and Audiences An argument is a social activity, the goal of which is interpersonal rational persuasion. More precisely, we ll say that an argument occurs
More informationEPL: Is that even English?
EPL: Is that even English? A: NOPE! It s Greek. Ethos, pathos, and logos are Greek words that essentially mean the following: Ethos = (ethics) character/credibility Pathos = emotion Logos = logic/reason
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,
More informationLogical Appeal (Logos)
Logical Appeal (Logos) Relies on sound reasoning, facts, statistics Uses evidence well Analyzes cause-effect relationships Uses patterns of inductive and deductive reasoning Pitfall: failure to clearly
More informationIn general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this:
#6 Model Argument Maps 1 Argument Mapping 6: Model Argument Maps Most of the following discussion provides model or prototype argument maps that can be applied to any argument that takes a similar form.
More informationb. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;
IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary
More informationThe Toulmin Model in Brief
The Toulmin Model in Brief A popular form of argument is the Toulmin model (other forms include classical and Rogerian). This model is named after Stephen Toulmin, who in The Uses of Argument proposed
More informationI'd Like to Have an Argument, Please.
I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please. A solid argument can be built just like a solid house: walls first, then the roof. Here s a building plan, plus three ways arguments collapse. July/August 2002 I want
More informationPlato- Sophist Reflections
Plato- Sophist Reflections In the Collected Dialogues of Plato: Gorgias, Plato hides behind the mask of his teacher, Socrates, and dismantles Gorgias by means of precisely that which he so adamantly argues
More informationPersuasive Language introduction to ethos, pathos & logos
Persuasive Language introduction to ethos, pathos & logos ARISTOTLE was a Greek philosopher who lived in the th century BCE. He was an influential thinker and wrote on many subjects from logic and ethics,
More informationCriticizing Definitions. Philosophy and Logic Unit 3, Section 3.4
Criticizing Definitions Philosophy and Logic Unit 3, Section 3.4 he fundamental requirement In any adequate definition, the definiens and the definiendum must have exactly the same extension. he term defined
More informationWriting a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim)
Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim) Marcinkus - AP Language and Composition Whenever you are asked to make an argument, you must begin with your thesis, or the claim that you are going to try to
More informationLIVING ON PURPOSE Week 4: Discovering Your Gifts 1. LEADER PREPARATION
LIVING ON PURPOSE Week 4: Discovering Your Gifts This includes: 1. Leader Preparation 2. Lesson Guide 1. LEADER PREPARATION LESSON OVERVIEW The lesson focuses on being a servant. Two disciples with their
More informationRhetorical Analysis Free Response Deconstruction Lesson
NATIONAL MATH + SCIENCE INITIATIVE English NMSI ENGLISH AP Language and Composition Rhetorical Analysis Free Response - 2015 Deconstruction Lesson Copyright 2016 National Math + Science Initiative, Dallas,
More informationPHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy
Dr. Tanya Rodriguez Assistant Professor of Philosophy Office: FFA- 114 Office Hours: MW 1:30-2:30 and TTH 10:30-11:30 Phone: (916) 558-2109 E- mail: RodrigT@scc.losrios.edu PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy
More informationPrentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013
A Correlation of Prentice Hall U.S. History 2013 A Correlation of, 2013 Table of Contents Grades 9-10 Reading Standards for... 3 Writing Standards for... 9 Grades 11-12 Reading Standards for... 15 Writing
More informationIntroduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2
Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2 Since its inception in the 1970s, stem cell research has been a complicated and controversial
More informationLIVING ON PURPOSE Week 4: Discovering Your Gifts 1. LEADER PREPARATION
LIVING ON PURPOSE Week 4: Discovering Your Gifts This includes: 1. Leader Preparation 2. Lesson Guide 1. LEADER PREPARATION LESSON OVERVIEW The lesson focuses on being a servant. Two disciples with their
More informationControlling Idea: Claims
Controlling Idea: Claims The controlling idea (thesis) of an essay is the one main idea which the writer wishes the reader to remember. A controlling idea may be expository (informative, explanatory, or
More informationContents. Acknowledgments... ix. Foreword...xix. Introduction...xxi
Contents Acknowledgments... ix Foreword...xix Introduction...xxi General Principles of Argumentation... 1 1. Be sure that the tribunal has jurisdiction.... 3 2. Know your audience.... 5 3. Know your case....
More informationArgument. What is it? How do I make a good one?
Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument
More informationArgumentation Techniques
Grab the handout from the outbox. Read both argumentative pieces regarding Miley Cyrus. Mark the components listed on the scavenger hunt on the back side. (claim, evidence, explanation, counter-claim,
More informationPrentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013
A Correlation of Prentice Hall Survey Edition 2013 Table of Contents Grades 9-10 Reading Standards... 3 Writing Standards... 10 Grades 11-12 Reading Standards... 18 Writing Standards... 25 2 Reading Standards
More information! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay
Prep Writing Persuasive Essay Purpose: The writer will learn how to effectively plan, draft, and compose a persuasive essay using the writing process. Objectives: The learner will: Demonstrate an understanding
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationRECOVERING ARGUMENT: A GUIDE TO CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING. Richard E. Mezo
RECOVERING ARGUMENT: A GUIDE TO CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING Richard E. Mezo Universal Publishers Parkland, Florida 1999 Mezo, Richard E. Recovering Argument: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Writing
More informationPHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim
More informationPERSUASIVE TERMS and WRITING. Notes PowerPoint
PERSUASIVE TERMS and WRITING Notes PowerPoint! TERMS TO KNOW:! Argument-! A mode of writing intended to win the reader s agreement.! This is similar to persuasion, but it has a difference of explaining
More informationFull file at
Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Summary Chapter 1 introduces students to main issues and branches of philosophy. The chapter begins with a basic definition of philosophy. Philosophy is an activity, and addresses
More informationPastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011
Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church http://www.fbcweb.org/doctrines.html September 8, 2011 Building Mental Muscle & Growing the Mind through Logic Exercises: Lesson 4a The Three Acts of the
More informationThe Ontological Argument
Running Head: THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 The Ontological Argument By Andy Caldwell Salt Lake Community College Philosophy of Religion 2350 THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 2 Abstract This paper will reproduce,
More informationWhy Physical Universe?
Why Physical Universe? The essence and juxtaposition of physical and spiritual. Physical choice VS Spiritual choice. Dilemma of a spiritual being. Uniqueness of a human being. The essence and the mechanism
More information2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation
VI. RULES OF PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE A. General 1. Public Forum Debate is a form of two-on-two debate which ask debaters to discuss a current events issue. 2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development
More informationHoughton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8 correlated to the Indiana Academic English/Language Arts Grade 8 READING READING: Fiction RL.1 8.RL.1 LEARNING OUTCOME FOR READING LITERATURE Read and
More informationOTTAWA ONLINE PHL Basic Issues in Philosophy
OTTAWA ONLINE PHL-11023 Basic Issues in Philosophy Course Description Introduces nature and purpose of philosophical reflection. Emphasis on questions concerning metaphysics, epistemology, religion, ethics,
More informationLet s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)
Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO (aka Dihydrogen monoxide) DHMO.org Dihydrogen-monoxide (Transtronics site) Coalition to Ban DHMO Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide! DHMO Chemical Danger Alert - The Horror
More informationChapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 1 Introduction Contents Introduction 5 1.1 How to study jurisprudence 6 1.2 Reading 7 1.3 Preparing for an examination in jurisprudence 9 Introduction This subject guide has been written to show
More informationLecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).
TOPIC: You need to be able to: Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). Organize arguments that we read into a proper argument
More informationEnglish II Pre-AP 1 st Quarter Extra Credit
English II Pre-AP 1 st Quarter Extra Credit We have spent the majority of the 1 st quarter studying rhetorical analysis. For your extra credit you should complete the following: Select a song with a political
More informationPROOF PROOF PROOF WHICH GOD SHOULD I CHOOSE? By Ben Kniskern
WHICH GOD SHOULD I CHOOSE? < By Ben Kniskern Copyright 2013 by Ben Kniskern Which God Should I Choose? by Ben Kniskern Printed in the United States of America ISBN 9781625095886 All rights reserved solely
More informationWorld-Wide Ethics. Chapter Two. Cultural Relativism
World-Wide Ethics Chapter Two Cultural Relativism The explanation of correct moral principles that the theory individual subjectivism provides seems unsatisfactory for several reasons. One of these is
More informationSkill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging
Joshua Foster - 21834444-05018100 Page 1 Exam 050181 - Persuasive Writing Traits of Good Writing Review pages 164-169 in your study guide for a complete explanation of the rating you earned for each trait
More informationBASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS
BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS 1 PATTERNS FOR SAYING WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING Part I: Ways to introduce standard views These offer a way to bring up a topic about a view so widely accepted that is it basically
More informationCritical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics
Critical Thinking The Very Basics (at least as I see them) Dona Warren Department of Philosophy The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point What You ll Learn Here I. How to recognize arguments II. How to
More information