Mr Adrian Barr Smith
|
|
- Lester Copeland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GENERAL PHARMACEUTICAL COUNCIL FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE PRINCIPAL HEARING 25 Canada Square, London E14 5LQ Thursday 17 November 2015 Chairman: Mr Michael Caplan QC Committee Members: Committee Secretary: Dr Frances Akor Mr Adrian Barr Smith Mr Mark Mallinson CASE OF: BROWN, Robin GPhC Registration No MR KABIR SIDDIQUI, Case Presenter, appeared on behalf of the General Pharmaceutical Council Mr Brown was present but not represented Transcript of the Shorthand Notes of T. A. Reed & Co Ltd Tel No:
2 I N D E X Page DETERMINATION IMPAIRMENT 1 DETERMINATION SANCTION DETERMINATION INTERIM MEASURES PLEASE NOTE: Copies printed from may differ in formatting and/or page numbering from hard copies
3 (The Committee went in camera at am and returned into open session at am) DETERMINATION IMPAIRMENT THE CHAIRMAN: This is principal hearing regarding Mr Robin Brown, a pharmacist first registered with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain on 9 September 1968 and subsequently with the General Pharmaceutical Council under number The Council is represented today by Mr Kabir Siddiqui. Mr Robin Brown also attends, and we are very grateful to him for doing so. The allegations have been put to Mr Brown. They have all been admitted by him and we have found them proved. We have now moved to the stage where we have to give a determination as to whether Mr Brown s fitness to practise is currently impaired. We have considered the submissions made by both Mr Siddiqui and Mr Brown. We have considered all the documentation that has been placed before us by both the Council and the registrant. The particulars of allegation in this case, which have been admitted by the registrant, are as follows: On 19 March 2015, whilst employed as a Locum Pharmacist at Asda Pharmacy Llandudno; 1. You made an error when checking a prescription for 50mg of Sildenafil which resulted in 50mg of Sertraline being dispensed to a patient; 2. Once the incorrectly dispensed item of 50 mg of Sertraline was returned by the patient, you removed the label from the dispensed item in order to conceal the dispensing error; 3. You returned the dispensed item of 50mg of Sertraline back into pharmacy stock, so that it was available to be re-dispensed; 4. You removed the prescription for 50mg of Sildenafil from the Pharmacy without authorisation; 5. You failed to report the dispensing error referred to in particular 1 above 6. Between 21 March 2015 to 23 April 2015, when questioned by pharmacy staff in relation to the missing prescription you denied any knowledge of the location of the missing prescription; 7. On 23 April 2015, when interviewed about the error you stated that the prescription for 50mg Sildenafil was in a folder within the pharmacy when you knew that you had removed the prescription from the pharmacy;
4 8. Your actions at 2, 3, 4 and 7 above were dishonest in that your actions sought to conceal that a dispensing error had occurred. By reason of the matters above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of your a) Misconduct. Dealing briefly with the factual background to the case, the registrant was employed as a locum pharmacist at Asda pharmacy in Llandudno. He worked on 19 March 2015, when the incident originally occurred, and he subsequently worked there on 3 April and 23 April We have considered evidence, which has been placed before us and which is accepted by the registrant, from Patient A and from three members of the pharmacy staff at Asda Pharmacy in Llandudno. They are: Tracey Welsh, the Accuracy Training Technician; John Evans, the superintendent pharmacist; and Tobia Nwimueyi, the Pharmacy Manager. Allegation 1 concerns that on 19 March 2015 the registrant made a dispensing error when checking a prescription of 50 mg of sildenafil, a medicine for erectile dysfunction, which resulted in 50 mg of sertraline, an antidepressant, being dispensed to Patient A. Patient A returned home after collecting his repeat prescription. He opened the bag that contained the medicine and realised that it was not the medication he normally received. The dispensing error came to light when Patient A returned to the pharmacy shortly after and spoke to Ms Welsh, to report that he thought he had been given the wrong medication. The sertraline was taken from Patient A by Ms Welsh and the patient was provided with the correct medication. That correct medication was labelled and signed by Ms Welsh, and checked and bagged by the registrant. In relation to allegations 2 to 6 the factual background is as follows. Ms Welsh informed the registrant that the label from the incorrectly dispensed box of medication had to be retained in order to allow an investigation into the error to be conducted. Ms Welsh placed the incorrectly dispensed medication, the prescription, a note detailing the dispensing error and her telephone number in a basket, which she left on a bench in the dispensary for the matter to be investigated by the pharmacy manager, Mr Nwimueyi, the following day. Before leaving the pharmacy, Ms Welsh informed the registrant that the error would be logged on to the pharmacy system and investigated. Later that evening she sent a text message to Mr Nwimueyi to inform him that she had left the dispensing error in the pharmacy. On 20 March 2015 Ms Welsh received a text message from Mr Nwimueyi to ask where the basket was. Ms Welsh called him to explain where she had left it and he advised that he was unable to find it. The next day, 21 March, Mr Nwimueyi states that a member of the pharmacy staff, Mr Dickinson, had contacted the registrant to ask about the whereabouts of the prescription and the registrant said that he did not know. Mr Nwimueyi then reviewed the pharmacy CCTV footage of the date of the registrant s
5 shift, that is 19 March. On watching this footage, he saw the registrant had taken the prescription from the basket, put the prescription in his pocket and removed the label that was on the box of sertraline and put the box back into the pharmacy stock. The Council s case was that this suggested that the registrant had misled Mr Dickinson when claiming that he was unaware of the whereabouts of the prescription. The registrant s actions were also in contravention of the pharmacy Standard Operating Procedures on how to manage dispensing errors. On Sunday 22 March 2015 Ms Welsh returned to work at the pharmacy and was informed of what was revealed by the review of the CCTV footage. During this shift she checked the drawer where the sertraline was usually stored and noticed that one of the boxes had been indented with her signature and the signature of the registrant. This was considered to be the incorrectly dispensed box of sertraline, which had been placed back in the pharmacy stock by the registrant. Ms Welsh contacted the registrant later on the same day. The registrant said that he had not touched the basket and that it should have been where Ms Welsh had left it on 19 March. Allegation 7 is in relation to dishonest responses during questioning at a disciplinary meeting. On 23 March 2015 Mr Nwimueyi completed an incident report and reported the incident, that is the dispensing errors, the missing basket and contents, and the review of the CCTV footage, to a pharmacy compliance team. Mr John Evans, the superintendent pharmacist, requested the pharmacy store management to conduct a disciplinary meeting with the registrant. That took place on 23 April At that meeting, when initially questioned about the location of the prescription, the registrant stated that it was in a folder within the pharmacy. When subsequently asked whether he had taken the prescription away with him on 19 March 2015 he admitted to having done so and to placing the incorrectly dispensed box of sertraline back on the shelf. He expressed his regret at acting unprofessionally, although maintained that this was the first time that he had acted like this. He apologised for the incident, explained that up until this incident he had considered himself to be a better than average pharmacist and an ethical one. The registrant was employed subsequent to 19 March for two other days: 3 April and 23 April. Following the investigation, the superintendent pharmacist ed the registrant on 8 May. He advised that the dispensing error was not his biggest concern; however, the registrant s subsequent action, namely his actions taken to cover up the error, were of concern. In the same the superintendent also asked the registrant to self-refer to the Council. Following that, the registrant did self-refer to the Council. He did so in a letter that was received by the Council on 22 May He admitted in that letter removing the label from the box of sertraline, placing the box back into the pharmacy stock and putting the prescription and Ms Welsh s note into his pocket. He also said that in his next shift at the pharmacy he would return the prescription and notes to the pharmacy box file that was kept for these purposes. The question of dishonesty, which arises in this case, has been recently considered in the case of Kirschner v General Dental Council. Mostyn J said that as things stand the test
6 is: The tribunal should first determine whether on the balance of probabilities, a defendant acted dishonestly by the standards of ordinary and honest members of that profession; and, if it finds that he or she did so, must go on to determine whether it is more likely than not that the defendant realised that what he or she was doing was by those standards, dishonest. Clearly the registrant has admitted the allegations of dishonesty and accepts that by his actions he was taking steps to cover up a dispensing error more likely than not dishonest by the standards of ordinary and honest members of the pharmacy profession, and that it was more likely than not that the registrant knew that what he was doing was by those standards dishonest. As I have said, the registrant has admitted all the particulars of allegation against him. We have to consider at the next stage whether his fitness to practise is currently impaired. The Council has submitted to us that there is evidence here on which we can make that finding. The registrant says that, although, in his words, it is a weak thing to say, he does not believe his fitness to practise is currently impaired. We have had regard to the submissions made to us by the Council and by the registrant on this issue and considered all the documentation that has been placed before us. There is considerable legal authority on what a panel has to consider when it comes to determine whether a registrant s fitness to practise is currently impaired. In the case of Cheatle v General Medical Council, Cranston J said: a panel must engage in a two-step process. First, it must decide whether there has been misconduct, deficient professional performance or whether the other circumstances set out in the section are present. Then it must go on to determine whether, as a result, fitness to practise is impaired. Thus it may be that despite a doctor having been guilty of misconduct, for example, a Fitness to Practise Panel may decide that his or her fitness to practise is not impaired. The Council invites the Committee to find impairment in accordance with Article 51A of the Pharmacy Order, which provides: A person s fitness to practise is to be regarded as impaired for the purposes of this Order only by reason of (a) misconduct. There is no strict definition of misconduct. In the case of Roylance v General Medical Council the judge said: Misconduct is a word of general effect, involving some act or omission which falls short of what would be proper in the circumstances. The standard of propriety may often be found by reference to the rules and standards ordinarily required to be followed by a medical practitioner in the particular circumstances and that such falling short must be serious.
7 In The Queen (on the application of Remedy UK) v General Medical Council, Elias LJ said: First, it may involve sufficiently serious misconduct in the exercise of professional practice such that it can properly be described as misconduct going to fitness to practise. Second, it can involve conduct of a morally culpable or otherwise disgraceful kind which may, and often will, occur outwith the course of professional practice itself, but which brings disgrace upon the doctor and thereby prejudices the reputation of the profession. The submissions here are that the registrant s actions fall well below the standards expected of a registered practitioner. We have been referred to the Council s Standards of conduct, ethics and performance, and it has been said and these have been accepted by the registrant that these have been breached. Under 6: Be honest and trustworthy, the Standards of conduct, ethics and performance say at 6.1: at 6.5: and at 6.8: Act with honesty and integrity to maintain public trust and confidence in your profession Meet acceptable standards of personal and professional conduct. Respond honestly, openly and politely to complaints and criticism. When considering current impairment Silber J set out in the case of Cohen: It must be highly relevant in determining if a doctor s fitness to practise is impaired that first his or her conduct which led to the charge is easily remediable, second that it has been remedied and third that it is highly unlikely to be repeated. The Council s view, placed before us, is that the dishonesty may demonstrate an attitudinal shortcoming that is arguably difficult to remedy. We have considered the statements made by Cranston J in the case of Cheatle v General Medical Council, in which he says: 21. There is clear authority that in determining impairment of fitness to practise at the time of the hearing regard must be had to the way the person has acted or failed to act in the past. 22. In my judgment this means that the context of the doctor s behaviour must be
8 examined. In circumstances where there is misconduct at a particular time, the issue becomes whether that misconduct, in the context of the doctor s behaviour both before the misconduct and to the present time, is such as to mean that his or her fitness to practise is impaired. The doctor s misconduct at a particular time may be so egregious that, looking forward, a panel is persuaded that the doctor is simply not fit to practise medicine without restrictions, or maybe at all. We have also been referred to what Mitting J said in the case of Zygmunt v General Medical Council, in which he gave examples of reasons for unfitness, including that, as he put it, the doctor had brought the profession into disrepute and the doctor had breached one of the fundamental tenets of the profession. Those are clearly matters that we need to consider. In the case of Grant v CHRE the judge said: In determining whether a practitioner s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct, the relevant panel should generally consider not only whether the practitioner continues to present a risk to members of the public in his or her current role, but also whether the need to uphold proper professional standards and public confidence in the profession would be undermined if a finding of impairment were not made in the particular circumstances. We have also been referred to the recommendations made by Dame Janet Smith in the Shipman Inquiry report, in which, amongst others, she said that when considering the question of the registrant s fitness to practise being impaired a number of the matters that need to be considered are as follows: whether in the past the registrant has brought or is liable in the future to bring the pharmacy profession into disrepute; has in the past breached or is liable in the future to breach one of the fundamental tenets of the pharmacy profession; has acted in the past dishonestly and is likely to act dishonestly in the future. All those are factors that we need to consider in our consideration of whether the registrant s fitness to practise is currently impaired. We also need to and have considered the question of the registrant s insight into what occurred. He has given evidence before us and we have taken note of all that he has said. We have also considered the statement that he made and also documents that have been placed before us at this stage. He has shown some insight but we cannot overlook the fact that there was a period of time that elapsed between what occurred, that is the covering up, and when he admitted the incident. It could be said that there was a pattern of dishonesty here. He only made the self-referral when in fact it was made clear to him that there was evidence and indeed when the employers of Asda suggested that that should take place. We refer particularly to paragraph 9 of the statement of John Evans that we have received. Mr Evans said that: When questioned as to why the error had not been reported as per pharmacy SOPs, Robin Brown said that he had been in then pharmacy on his own and so did not think to report it. He was then asked about the location of the original
9 prescription, Robin Brown initially insisted during the interview that it was contained within a folder in the pharmacy. Leyan Dyson then challenged this during the interview and explained that CCTV footage shows Robin Brown taking the prescription away from the pharmacy premises. Robin Brown then admitted that he had taken the prescription away from the pharmacy premises when he should not have. In other words, it was only after the interview and it was made clear to him that there was the existence of CCTV footage that he eventually admitted what had occurred in the pharmacy. He was also asked by the panel why he did not admit what had occurred earlier. He said he took the wrong path and he could give no plausible explanation. Whilst he is remorseful, and we accept that and we accept that he has from the very commencement of these proceedings admitted the allegations against him, we find it strange that he refers to what occurred as crass. Having said all of that, we do accept that he has shown remorse and we do accept that he has admitted the allegations against him and we do accept that he does have an unblemished career. We have also had regard to the fact that the allegation here is one of dishonesty and that there are breaches of the most fundamental tenets of the profession. Having considered all the matters placed before us and the submissions, we have come to the conclusion that a finding of impairment is necessary in the circumstances of this case to maintain public confidence in the profession. We therefore find that the registrant s fitness to practise is currently impaired (The Committee went in camera at am and returned into open session at pm) DETERMINATION - SANCTION THE CHAIRMAN: The registrant has admitted the allegations and we have said that we find the facts of the case proved. We have also made a finding that his fitness to practise is currently impaired and we have set out the reasons why we consider that to be the position. We will now give our decision on the question of sanction. The Committee has to decide what if any sanction should be imposed in this case. The Committee s powers upon a finding of impairment of fitness to practise are set out in Article 54(2) of the Order. They are a warning; the registrant s removal from the register; a direction for suspension for a period not exceeding 12 months; or a direction for conditions to be imposed upon the registrant s registration for a period not exceeding
10 three years. The Committee is aware that the purpose of any sanction is not to punish, although any sanction may be punitive in its effects. Any sanction must be just, proportionate and appropriate. The Indicative Sanctions Guidance states that the purpose of sanction is threefold, namely the protection of the public, the maintenance of public confidence in the profession and the maintenance of proper standards. The Indicative Sanctions Guidance sets out as the key factors to consider in deciding the most appropriate sanctions to impose: the extent to which the registrant has breached the standards of conduct, ethics and performance published by the GPhC the interests of the registrant, weighed against the public interest the personal circumstances of the registrant and any mitigation the registrant has offered any testimonials and character references given in support of the registrant any relevant factors that may aggravate the registrant s conduct in the case any submissions made to the committee by the GPhC s representative, the registrant or their representative the contents of this guidance. To make sure that the sanction is proportionate the Committee should consider each available sanction, starting with the lowest and deciding if it is appropriate to the case. If it is not, the Committee shall consider the next sanction until it decides whether a particular sanction is appropriate. The Committee should also consider the sanction immediately above and say why it has decided the more serious sanction is not appropriate and proportionate. We have to give weight to the public interest and the need for public confidence in the profession and the maintenance of proper standards, as well as to consider the position of the registrant. The registrant accepts that he was dishonest. The guidance says that there are many acts which, whilst not presenting a risk to the public, are so serious that they undermine confidence in the profession as a whole. Cases involving dishonesty can be complicated and the guidance says that the Committee should carefully consider the context and the circumstances in which the dishonesty took place. Therefore, though serious, there is not an assumption of removal in all cases involving dishonesty. The guidance also says at paragraph 6.10: When deciding on the appropriate sanction in a case involving dishonesty, the committee should balance all the relevant issues, including any aggravating and mitigating factors. It is important to understand the context in which the dishonest
11 act took place and make a decision considering the key factors. The committee should then put proper emphasis on the effect a finding of dishonesty has on public confidence in the profession. We have been referred to authority in relation to this issue. The case of Bolton v the Law Society has been brought to our attention, where Sir Thomas Bingham said: Any solicitor who is shown to have discharged his professional duties with anything less than complete integrity, probity and trustworthiness must expect severe sanctions to be imposed In the case of Siddiqui v General Medical Council, the judge emphasised the importance of public confidence in professionals. In the case of The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care v Nursing and Midwifery Council and Wilson, Laing J emphasised that: the over-riding factor in the case was the public interest in maintaining the reputation of the profession. The NMC and the public are entitled to the highest standards of honesty and integrity from the registrants In the recent case of The Professional Standards Authority v Health and Care Professions Council and Ajeneye, the judge said: Deliberate dishonesty must come high on the scale of misconduct. That is particularly so when a direct consequence of that misconduct is physical harm to a patient. The lack of financial motive or personal gain means that a further aggravating feature is not present. It does not mitigate the risk of harm to patients created by the breach of professional standards. Equally, the number of instances of dishonesty is important, once might be described as an aberration but more than once, even if only twice, may demonstrate a tendency to act dishonestly. A failure immediately or speedily to acknowledge and admit such conduct is material. The aggravating features in this particular case are that the incident took place within the pharmacy where the pharmacist, that is the registrant, was at that time employed. Furthermore, the registrant at that time sought to cover up his error and in so doing acted dishonestly. As we have already referred to, there was in our view a pattern of dishonesty. He only self-referred the matter when it was suggested to him that he should do so by the company, following the fact that there was clear evidence that he had acted in the way in which he sought to say he had not acted. We do, however, accept that there was no harm to patients and there was no financial motive. Nevertheless, this was an act of dishonesty, and that has to be regarded very seriously. In mitigation, we have accepted the registrant s position. We have taken note of the fact that he has been a registered pharmacist since He has an unblemished record.
12 He has placed before us a reference from Mr Suketu Patel, who is an independent owning and managing two pharmacies in Cheshire. The registrant has worked for him as a regular locum. He has clearly acted in the best interests of that company and there is no suggestion that he has acted in any way other than properly at all times whilst employed. We have also taken note of the fact that he has held with distinction a number of positions and he has given service both to the profession and to the public. It is also right to record that he has attended and given evidence before us today. We have considered carefully all that he has said. We have considered all the documentation that has been placed before us. The Committee has come to the conclusion that it does not consider a warning would be appropriate. The matter is far too serious in the Committee s view for a warning. The Committee does not consider that there are any conditions that could be imposed that would address the public interest. The Committee has considered carefully whether a period of suspension would be fair and proportionate to highlight to the profession and the public that the conduct of the registrant was unacceptable and unbefitting of a member of the pharmacy profession. Public confidence in the profession demands no lesser action. The Committee does consider that a period of suspension would be fair and proportionate. The Committee has considered the question of removal of the registrant from the register and does not believe that the registrant s behaviour, given the particular facts and the context of this case and particularly the mitigation placed before it, requires his name to be removed. Therefore, the Committee has come to the conclusion that the appropriate sanction in this case is one of suspension. We accordingly direct that the registrant be suspended from the practice for a period of three months, which we consider to be the appropriate length in the case. We do not consider that there is a need for a review before the expiry of the period of suspension. That period of suspension will commence after 28 days, the period in which the registrant can, if he wishes to, and he is able to consider whether he wishes to, lodge an appeal
13 A (The Committee went in camera at pm and returned into open session at pm) DETERMINATION INTERIM MEASURES B C D E F G THE CHAIRMAN: We have considered whether we should impose interim measures in this case under Article 60. Quite rightly, the Council brings to our attention that it is open to us to do so and it is right that we consider whether it is appropriate to impose interim measures. They can be imposed where it is necessary for the protection of members of the public or otherwise in the public interest. The Council brings the powers to our attention but does not make a formal submission that there should be interim measures in this case. Mr Brown says to us by way of his submissions that they should not be imposed. He says that he has not reneged on any appointments and it would be fair and reasonable to allow him the 28-day period in order to fulfil his commitments and to cancel any appointments that there are. We have considered our powers and considered the submissions made to us. We have had particular regard to the fact that there has not been an interim order in this case and that Mr Brown has acted as a pharmacist since the incident happened in March We have particularly had regard to the testimonial placed before us from Mr Patel, who runs two pharmacies in Widnes, Cheshire, where Mr Brown is a regular locum. We have had regard particularly to what Mr Patel has said about the conduct of Mr Brown and the way he has acted. We do not consider that there is any necessity for the protection of members of the public or otherwise in the public interest for us to impose interim measures in this case and therefore we do not do so. As I said, Mr Brown, and as I am sure you appreciate, the period of suspension will therefore start after the 28-day period, but you do have the right within that 28-day period to appeal, should you so wish. We would like to thank you, Mr Siddiqui, for your assistance on behalf of the Council. Mr Brown, we would like to thank you for coming along today and we have taken account of what you have said. We would like to thank our Secretary and everyone else involved in the proceedings. That concludes the hearing H T. A. REED & CO LTD
Miss Elaine Donnelly
GENERAL PHARMACEUTICAL COUNCIL FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE 129 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7BT Wednesday 22 May 2013 Chairman: Mr Christopher Gibson QC Committee Members: Clinical Adviser: Committee Secretary:
More informationProfessor Jim Smith. MISS NIMI BRUCE, counsel, of Capsticks, solicitors, appeared on behalf of the General Pharmaceutical Council.
GENERAL PHARMACEUTICAL COUNCIL FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE 129 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7BT Tuesday 9 September 2014 Chairman: Mr Michael Simon Committee Members: Committee Secretary: Mrs Jillian Alderwick
More informationDAY Mrs Lisa Davis appeared on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.
T ROYAL PARMAUTIAL SOITY O RAT RITAIN ISIPLINARY OMMITT Tuesday 9 March 2010 hairman is onour John Samuels Q Panel Members: Mr Peter Jones (Professional) Mrs Joy Tweed (Lay) ase of Mr Subhashchandra Kantilal
More informationRECTIFICATION. Summary 2
Contents Summary 2 Pro Life All Party Parliamentary Group: Resolution letter 3 Letter from the Commissioner to Dr Nicolette Priaulx, 24 October 16 3 Written Evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner
More informationIN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four
IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four IN THE MATTER OF Alan Hogan, a member of the Certified General Accountants of Ontario BETWEEN:
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT
Not reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT Case no: C 241/16 In the matter between: CITY OF CAPE TOWN Applicant and IMATU OBO D BRONKHORST SALGBC A
More informationIN THE MATTER OF DAVID ALEXANDER FARBROTHER, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974
No. 9429-2006 IN THE MATTER OF DAVID ALEXANDER FARBROTHER, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr A H B Holmes (in the chair) Mr P Kempster Mr G Fisher Date of Hearing: 26th October
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations
More informationTHE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO.
Indexed as: Frith (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing directed by the Complaints Committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons
More informationThe Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report
The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, and in the matter of a hearing regarding the conduct of Mary Jo Rothecker, a member of the Law Society of
More informationGeneral Pharmaceutical Council Consultation on religion, personal values and beliefs in pharmacy practice
General Pharmaceutical Council Consultation on religion, personal values and beliefs in pharmacy practice What is the problem? Religious opinion is becoming more marginalised in the public sphere and there
More informationBefore: MR JUSTICE FOSKETT Between : (A PROTECTED PARTY BY HER MOTHER & LITIGATION FRIEND, SHELLEY DUFFY)
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 867 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Case No: HQ13X05526 TLQ/14/0710 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/03/2015 Before:
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2011
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2010-473 JULY TERM, 2011 In re Grievance of Lawrence Rosenberger
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT NELSON CRI [2016] NZDC MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Prosecutor. WARREN MCNABB Defendant
EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT NELSON CRI-2016-086-000112 [2016] NZDC 24925 MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Prosecutor v WARREN MCNABB Defendant Hearing: 7 December 2016
More informationCOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County
More informationUNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016
Case No.: 892 UNIVERSITY TRIBUNAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN THE MATTER OF charges of academic dishonesty filed October 12, 2016 AND IN THE MATTER OF the University of Toronto Code of Behaviour on Academic
More informationMaking a Formal Complaint Advice for Congregations & the Wider Community
Making a Formal Complaint Advice for Congregations & the Wider Community Introduction Clergy in the Diocese of Liverpool are expected to maintain high standards of conduct and behaviour. From time to time
More informationDecision. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics. Stephen B. Sacharow appeared on behalf of respondent.
S~Jp_I~E~ME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 02-432 IN THE MATTER OF RAYMOND T. LEBON AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: Decided: February 6, 2003 May 2, 2003 Lee A. Gronikowski
More informationWARSAW CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
WARSAW CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TEACHER APPLICATION PACKET TEACHER APPLICATION FORM 909 South Buffalo Street, Warsaw, Indiana 46580 www.warsawchristian.org Ph. 574. 267.5788 574. 267.1486 Fax wcs@warsawchristian.org
More information15.2 SAFE MINISTRY WITH PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEXUAL OFFENCE OR ARE THE SUBJECT OF A NEGATIVE FINDING
Section 15 Safe Ministry Practice 15.2 SAFE MINISTRY WITH PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A SEXUAL OFFENCE OR ARE THE SUBJECT OF A NEGATIVE FINDING The Anglican Diocese of Newcastle sees as a central
More informationLAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and
File No. HE20070047 LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing regarding the conduct of Calum J. Bruce, a Member
More informationHELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO. P123/98
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO. P123/98 In the matter between : SUPERSTAR HERBS Applicant and DIRECTOR, CCMA & OTHERS Respondent JUDGEMENT MLAMBO J : [1] There are two
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY. and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between MILWAUKEE COUNTY and MILWAUKEE DEPUTY SHERIFF S ASSOCIATION Case 625 No. 67051 (Michalski Grievance) Appearances: Timothy R.
More informationINTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE
INTRODUCTION TO GUIDELINES FOR CHURCH DISCIPLINE We believe that loving church discipline is one of the greatest blessings and privileges of belonging to a Christian church. The following Guidelines were
More informationSUBSTITUTE APPLICATION
Foundation Preparatory Academy PO Box 488 Lake Jackson, TX 77566 www.foundationprep.com SUBSTITUTE APPLICATION Thank you for your interest in a substitute teaching position at Foundation Preparatory Academy.
More informationGood Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application. on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have
Wednesday, 4 April 2018 (10.00 am) Good Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have been served and the application
More informationWEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE
WEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE Statement of Wolverine Pride I am entrusted with the responsibility of upholding and contributing to an atmosphere of mutual respect, honesty, and fairness. My personal
More informationERICA DUGGAN HM CORONER FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GREATER LONDON
Claim No: CO/2682/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 20 May 2010 BEFORE: LORD JUSTICE ELIAS MR JUSTICE
More informationBefore: MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF Between: LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL
Neutral Citation Number: [2010] EWHC 2211 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/3123/2010 Sitting at: Leeds Combined Court 1 Oxford Row Leeds West
More informationSUNSHINE BIBLE ACADEMY
SUNSHINE BIBLE ACADEMY 400 Sunshine Drive Miller, SD 57362 605.853.3071 ph 605.853.3072 fax www.sunshinebible.org Employment Application - Staff PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Date of Application: I. PERSONAL Name
More informationReport of the Board of Trustees. In the Matter of Professor Fei Wang
Report of the Board of Trustees In the Matter of Professor Fei Wang December 14, 2018 Introduction This matter is before the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (the Board ) pursuant to Article
More informationIN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS JOSEPH MAZZARELLA : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 0405-276 At its meeting of June 9, 2005, the State
More informationStudent Honor Code Introduction
1 Student Honor Code Introduction This Student Honor Code is intended to furnish as much information as possible concerning the College and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) policies
More informationPROGRESS HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: HYPONATRAEMIA RELATED DEATHS HELD AT THE HILTON HOTEL, BELFAST
PROGRESS HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: HYPONATRAEMIA RELATED DEATHS HELD AT THE HILTON HOTEL, BELFAST ON FRIDAY, 30 TH MAY 2008 1 [COMMENCED] 11.10 MR J O'HARA: Good morning everybody. Thank you for coming.
More informationOn the alleged perversity of the evidential view of testimony
700 arnon keren On the alleged perversity of the evidential view of testimony ARNON KEREN 1. My wife tells me that it s raining, and as a result, I now have a reason to believe that it s raining. But what
More informationACCREDITATION POLICY
1. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS Baptist Churches of South Australia Inc ACCREDITATION POLICY This Accreditation Policy has been prepared by the Accreditation and Ordination Committee in accordance with Clause
More informationHutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Application Submission Instructions Friday, March 29, 2019 Mail Complete Application Packet to: Preferred -
Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church Pastor Search Announcement & Qualifications The Hutchinson Missionary Baptist Church has been in existence and serving the community for 119 years and was a pivotal
More informationWEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE
WEST POTOMAC HIGH SCHOOL HONOR CODE Statement of Wolverine Pride I am entrusted with the responsibility of upholding and contributing to an atmosphere of mutual respect, honesty, and fairness. My personal
More informationApplication Form for Ecclesiastical Endorsement for Professional Organizations
Ministerial Excellence, Support and Authorization / Local Church Ministries United Church of Christ, 700 Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1100 Application Form for Ecclesiastical Endorsement for
More informationSUBSTITUTE TEACHER APPLICATION
SUBSTITUTE TEACHER APPLICATION Your interest in Mount Calvary Christian School is appreciated. We realize that the key to a successful Christian School is its staff. We are seeking applicants who are professionally
More informationApplication for Member in Discernment
Application for Member in Discernment Covenant of Discernment and Formation Committee on Ministry Fox Valley Association Illinois Conference U.C.C. 1 The Call to Authorized Ministry One of the distinguishing
More informationArticle 31 under Part 3 on Fundamental Rights and Duties of current draft Constitution provides for Right to Religious freedom:
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND www.ohchr.org TEL: +41 22 917 9359 / +41 22 917 9407 FAX: +41 22
More informationVeritas Classical Christian Academy Faculty Application
PERSONAL INFORMATION Name Last First MI Address Street City State Zip Cell Ph Home Ph Work Ph Email Social Security # - - Are you 18 years or Older? Yes No List any and all other names by which you have
More informationFull Name: Present Address: Phone: Days ( ) Evenings ( ) Cell ( ) Address:
Thank you for your interest in employment with Whitefield Academy. We realize that the key to a successful Christian School is its staff. We are seeking applicants who are professionally qualified, has
More informationAnthony Mangan an Order to Show Cause. The Order was predicated on charges of
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS ANTHONY MANGAN : ORDER OF SUSPENSION : DOCKET NO: 0506-142 At its meeting of April 11, 2002, the State
More informationUNIVERSAL CHURCH OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD IN SOUTH AFRICA ( THE CHURCH )
1 CASE NUMBER: 31/2013 DATE OF HEARING: 30 JULY 2013 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2013 UNIVERSAL CHURCH OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD IN SOUTH AFRICA ( THE CHURCH ) COMPLAINANT vs SABC3 RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL:
More informationOpening Date: November 1, 2014 Closing Date: January 31, 2015
Vacancy Announcement Full-Time Pastor First Union Missionary Baptist Church 1001 Webster Street - San Francisco California 94115 Phone: 415/563-3532 - FAX 415/563-5241 or email: FUBCSF70@yahoo.com Opening
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST
ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST JUDICIAL PROCEDURE Printed: February 2006 JUDICIAL PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION The purpose of
More informationTarget 1. Ensure proper focus of your investigations
Target 1. Ensure proper focus of your investigations Follow directions given by the Intake Committee and your supervisors. Address issues within the scope of the case. This topic is entirely subjective.
More information-and- WAYNE HENNESSEY DECISION OF THE REGULATORY COMMISSION. Hennessey, a first team goalkeeper and Welsh International who plays for Crystal
IN THE MATTER OF THE REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION Before: William Norris QC Francis Duku Alan Hardy B E T W E E N:- THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION -and- WAYNE HENNESSEY DECISION OF THE REGULATORY
More informationStuart Gold appeared on behalf of the District VC Ethics Committee. To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the
SUPREME COURT OF NEWJERSEY Disciplinary Review Board Docket No. DRB 96-299 IN THE MATTER OF DONALD J. RINALDI AN ATTORNEY AT LAW Decision Argued: October 17, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996 Stuart Gold
More informationHouse&of&Bishops &Declaration&on&the&Ministry&of&Bishops&and&Priests& All&Saints,&Cheltenham:&Report&of&the&Independent&Reviewer&
House&of&Bishops &Declaration&on&the&Ministry&of&Bishops&and&Priests& Introduction All&Saints,&Cheltenham:&Report&of&the&Independent&Reviewer& 1.! On 10 April 2015 the Director of Forward in Faith, Dr
More informationExceptional Education Distinctively Christian
Exceptional Education Distinctively Christian 36-38 Sacandaga Road Scotia, NY 12302 518-370-4272 fax 518-370-4778 www.mekeel.org Dear Applicant: Your interest in Mekeel Christian Academy is appreciated.
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR. In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE. and COUNCIL #10
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE and COUNCIL #10 Case 46 No. 59774 (Grievance Regarding One-day Suspension of R_ C_) Appearances:
More informationFor those seeking to transfer ordination credentials to the EPC, see the information on before filling out this form.
Date: The EPC Ministerial Vocation Committee and Office of the Stated Clerk provide resources and advice to both pastors and congregational search committees. To that end, we ask congregations and ministers
More informationSection 8 - The Clergy Discipline Measure
The Diocese of Exeter Bishop s Guidelines for the Ordained Ministry Section 8 - The Clergy Discipline Measure The Clergy Discipline Measure came fully into force on 1 st January 2006. It provides a new
More informationHONOR CODE. We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage.
HONOR CODE We will strive to build a community based on respect, honesty, and courage. Table of Contents Mission... 1 Honor Code... 2 Honor System... 3 Values Education... 9 Mission The mission of The
More informationAPPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT POSITION: CLASSROOM TEACHER
65 Stuart Street P. O. Box 282 Goodna 4300 Goodna 4300 Phone: 3437 9000 Fax: 3437 9010 e-mail: admin@wcc.qld.edu.au www.wcc.qld.edu.au APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT POSITION: CLASSROOM TEACHER Please read
More informationSan Joaquin Valley Christian School Association Stone Ridge Christian Certified Staff Application
San Joaquin Valley Christian School Association Stone Ridge Christian Certified Staff Application Your interest in Stone Ridge Christian is appreciated. We invite you to fill out this initial application
More informationR V HANNAH BONSER 11 JULY 2012 SHEFFIELD CROWN COURT SENTENCING REMARKS OF MR JUSTICE CRANSTON
R V HANNAH BONSER 11 JULY 2012 SHEFFIELD CROWN COURT SENTENCING REMARKS OF MR JUSTICE CRANSTON 1. On 14 February this year Casey Kearney was murdered while going on a sleepover with a friend in Doncaster.
More informationWestern Cape Division of the High Court (Deputy Judge President)
Judicial Service Commission Interviews 8 April 2016, Morning session Western Cape Division of the High Court (Deputy Judge President) Interview of Mr L G Nuku DISCLAMER: These detailed unofficial transcripts
More informationGuideline Leaflet PC10: Hiring of Church Premises
Guideline Leaflet PC10: Hiring of Church Premises Most churches hire out their premises to outside groups. These may be one off arrangements or a regular booking. These notes will help churches make appropriate
More informationCase Name: R. v. Koumoudouros. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros. [2005] O.J. No Certificate No.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Koumoudouros Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros [2005] O.J. No. 5055 Certificate No. 68643727 Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton, Ontario B. Zabel J. Heard:
More informationREGISTRATION AND OPT OUT NOTICE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES. DICK SMITH REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS (NOS. 2017/ and 2018/52431)
REGISTRATION AND OPT OUT NOTICE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES DICK SMITH REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS (NOS. 2017/294069 and 2018/52431) IMPORTANT: This Notice contains information about your legal rights.
More informationChristian Fellowship of Love Baptist Church Detroit, Michigan PASTOR JOB DESCRIPTION
Holding fast the faithful word as he has been taught, that he may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort and convict those who contradict. Titus: 1-9 (NKJV). Christian Fellowship of Love Baptist Church
More informationTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 979 Mary Dunn Road Barnstable, MA Phone: (508) Fax: (508)
TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 979 Mary Dunn Road Barnstable, MA 02630 Phone: (508) 790-0114 Fax: (508) 790-1293 T E A C H E R A P P L I C A T I O N Your interest in Trinity Christian Academy is appreciated.
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT Date of award: 31 January In the arbitration between: and
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: Gail McEwan Case Reference No.: WECT10067-14 Date of award: 31 January 2015 In the arbitration between: DAKALO MATEMBEIE Union/Employee party and TOTAL SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED
More informationPromoting. a safer church Safeguarding policy statement for children, young people and adults
Promoting a safer church Safeguarding policy statement for children, young people and adults The Archbishops Council 2017 Published in 2017 for the House of Bishops of the General Synod of the Church of
More informationDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL Table of Contents I. Preamble 2 II. Responsibility 3 III. Pastoral Standards 3 1. Conduct for Pastoral Counselors and Spiritual Directors
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL DECISION
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL In the Matter of: ) ) THOMAS KAWIKA LEE ) OAH No. 16-0555-POC ) APSC No. 2015-13 I. Introduction
More informationFreedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University
University of Newcastle - Australia From the SelectedWorks of Neil J Foster January 23, 2013 Freedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University Neil J Foster Available at: https://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/66/
More informationCODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL
CODE OF PASTORAL CONDUCT FOR CHURCH PERSONNEL June 2016 Table of Contents I. Preamble 2 II. Responsibility 3 III. Pastoral Standards 3 1. Conduct for Pastoral Counselors and Spiritual Directors 3 2. Confidentiality
More informationAN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of the AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES OF NEBRASKA PREAMBLE:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AN ECCLESIASTICAL POLICY AND A PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF MINISTERIAL STANDING of
More informationFull Gospel Assemblies 3018 E. Lincoln Hwy. P. O Box 337 Parkesburg, PA 19365
Full Gospel Assemblies 3018 E. Lincoln Hwy. P. O Box 337 Parkesburg, PA 19365 Full Gospel Assemblies Inquiry Dear Minister of God, Greetings to you in the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. We
More informationComplaint against Brian Harris acting as Independent Examiner of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Complaint against Brian Harris acting as Independent Examiner of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. 1. My name is Graham Senior Milne, of Norham, Northumberland. I was born in 1955 and
More informationNON-TEACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION. Position Desired: Schedule Desired: Full-Time Part-Time Substitute Secondary Position Desired:
NON-TEACHING EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION We consider applicants for all positions without regard to race, color, creed, gender, national origin, age, disability, marital or veteran status, or any other legally
More informationApplication Form Non Teaching Position
Application Form Non Teaching Position Freshwater Christian College s policy is to employ staff who are suitably qualified for the position they are applying for, and who can support the mission of the
More informationRELIGION OR BELIEF. Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team
RELIGION OR BELIEF Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team January 2006 The British Humanist Association (BHA) 1. The BHA is the principal organisation representing
More informationMOUNT CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH ENGLEWOOD, NJ
PASTORAL VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT MOUNT CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH ENGLEWOOD, NJ Senior Pastor Application Name of Applicant Instructions: Please fill out the attached application in complete detail. If there
More informationPITTSBURGH. Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014
Issued: March 1993 Revised: October 2002 Updated: August 2003 Updated: August 2006 Updated: March 2008 Updated: April 2014 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH Clergy Sexual Misconduct The teaching of the Church,
More informationlicense to practice pharmacy. This matter was heard on January 19,2011 by the Board located at
n The Matter Of: BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLNA BOARD OF PHARMACY Reciprocity Application of rving Louis Trust ORDER DENYNG RECPROCTY THS MATTER came before the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy ("Board" concerning
More informationHIGH POINT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 307 North Rotary Drive High Point, North Carolina (336) FAX (336)
HIGH POINT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 307 North Rotary Drive High Point, North Carolina 27262 (336) 841-8702 FAX (336) 841-8701 INITIAL TEACHER APPLICATION Your interest in High Point Christian Academy is appreciated.
More informationDecember 12, Re: Adrian Peterson Appeal
Jeffery L. Kessler Winston & Strawn, LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Akin Gump 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 200036-1564 Re: Adrian Peterson Appeal Gentlemen: Adrian Peterson, a
More informationTHE QUEEN S BENCH Winnipeg Centre. - and - THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG. APPLICATION UNDER: Court of Queen s Bench Rule 14 AFFIDAVIT OF MARTIN GREEN
QB File No. 13-01-81654 THE QUEEN S BENCH Winnipeg Centre BETWEEN: MARTIN GREEN, applicant, - and - THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG respondents. APPLICATION UNDER: Court of Queen s Bench Rule 14 AFFIDAVIT OF
More informationName: First Middle Last. Other names used (alias, maiden, nickname): Current Address: Street/P.O. Box City State Zip Code
Grace Evangelical Presbyterian Church Children s Ministry Application Please answer each question. The information on this application will not be disclosed to unauthorized persons. Name: First Middle
More informationNew Hope Baptist Church Profile
New Hope Baptist Church Profile Page 1 of 9 Mission Statement To bring people to Jesus and membership in His family. Develop them to Christ-like maturity, and equip them for their ministry in the Church
More informationHeritage Christian Academy
Heritage Christian Academy Raising the bar in Christian Education 12006 Shadow Creek Pkwy Pearland, Texas 77584 Phone: 713.436.8422 www.hcapatriots.com info@hcapatriots Support Staff Application Our school
More informationthe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations
IN THE MATTER OF a complaint pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations AND IN THE MATTER OF a Public Complaint Adjudication pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION Petitioner - against - ANGEL AQUINO Respondent
Dep t of Correction v. Aquino OATH Index No. 1425/14 (Apr. 25, 2014), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Mar. 8, 2016), appended, aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Case No. 2016-0253 (Aug. 4, 2016), appended
More informationCalvary Baptist Church 1502 Twentieth Street Santa Monica, CA 90404
Calvary Baptist Church 1502 Twentieth Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 Closing Date: August 19, 2018 The Calvary Baptist Church of Santa Monica, CA, is prayerfully seeking a pastor for its congregation. We
More informationTHE UNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY S NOTE ON THE STANDARD OF PROOF
THE UNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY S NOTE ON THE STANDARD OF PROOF Introduction 1. This note examines and seeks to explain the legal context in which a decision falls to made by the
More informationIn defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech
In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech Understanding religious freedom Religious freedom is a fundamental human right the expression of which is bound
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: PA/13137/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationPastoral Vacancy Announcement
Pastoral Vacancy Announcement Fellowship Bible Baptist Church, organized in 1980, is located in Warner Robins, Georgia. We are seeking a full-time Senior Pastor called by God to serve as the spiritual
More informationBAPTIST UNION OF TASMANIA
PASTORS MANUAL BAPTIST UNION OF TASMANIA 19 January 2012 This page has been left blank intentionally Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Categories of Pastoral Leaders... 3 3. Accredited Pastoral Leaders
More informationv Pierre Lewis, Isaac Boateng, Jemmikai Orlebar Forbes & Rachel Kenehan the Crown Court Winchester March 2014 Sentencing remarks Justice Keith
R v Pierre Lewis, Isaac Boateng, Jemmikai Orlebar Forbes & Rachel Kenehan In the Crown Court at Winchester 3 March 2014 Sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Keith Lewis, Boateng and Forbes, will you stand
More informationPositivism A Model Of For System Of Rules
Positivism A Model Of For System Of Rules Positivism is a model of and for a system of rules, and its central notion of a single fundamental test for law forces us to miss the important standards that
More informationSOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 7400 Eldridge Rd Houston, Texas 77083-3442 (281) 561-7400 APPLICATION Your interest in Southwest Christian Academy is appreciated. We invite you to fill out this application
More informationChristian Fellowship of Love Baptist Church Detroit, Michigan PASTOR JOB DESCRIPTION
But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry. 2 Timothy 4:5 Christian Fellowship of Love Baptist Church Detroit, Michigan PASTOR JOB DESCRIPTION
More information