Today s Lecture. René Descartes W.K. Clifford Preliminary comments on Locke
|
|
- Andrew Rose
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Today s Lecture René Descartes W.K. Clifford Preliminary comments on Locke
2 René Descartes: The First There are two motivations for his method of doubt that Descartes mentions in the first paragraph of this (FP, p.147). (1) He had believed many falsehoods in his childhood, and this raised legitimate doubts about the truth of the beliefs he now held (as they were acquired cumulatively and taken to be true in part because of their relation to his earlier beliefs), and (2) a stable and lasting science requires foundations that are free of reasonable doubt.
3 René Descartes: The First Descartes method of doubt is designed to demolish his beliefs about himself and the world and leave no belief, judgment or principle that can be reasonably doubted. It accomplishes this by a series of reflections that successively undercut possible resistance to doubt.
4 René Descartes: The First First stage of doubt (see FP, p.148): (1) I will regard as false any belief for which I can generate any doubt. (2) In the past I have regarded beliefs based on or through the use of the senses as most true. (3) I have, however, been deceived by my senses. (4) It is best to hold at least some mistrust of that which, or those who, have deceived us even once. (5) Given (1) through (4), I will regard beliefs based on or acquired through the use of the senses as false.
5 René Descartes: The First He concedes that we will find the scope of this argument too broad to be plausible. Descartes supposes that we will want to distinguish empirical claims based on evidence acquired by our senses at the very limits of their capacities from empirical claims that are made well within the accepted parameters of our faculties reliability (see second full paragraph on page 148 of your FP).
6 René Descartes: The First Second stage of doubt (see FP, p.148): (1) I will regard as false any belief for which I can generate any doubt. (2) I believe that I am xing, where xing is a common action undertaken in my daily affairs and the evidence for my xing is not derived from the use of my senses at the limits of their capacities.
7 René Descartes: The First (3) I have been asleep and dreamt much the same thing as I am now perceiving. (4) I cannot be certain that at this moment I am not dreaming. (5) If I am dreaming at this moment, then my present perceptions are false. (6) Given (1) through (5), I will regard such beliefs as this false.
8 René Descartes: The First This, according to Descartes, is still not enough to demolish all our beliefs. After all, though we may doubt the veracity of experience, there are certain general properties of objects that we cannot merely think or imagine into existence. They, at least, must have their origins elsewhere than our imaginations. Also, there are putative truths (e.g. in the mathematical sciences) that are themselves held to be true a priori (FP, p.148).
9 René Descartes: The First Third stage of doubt (see FP, p.149): (1) I will regard as false any belief for which I can generate any doubt. (2) I have a belief in an omnipotent divine Creator who is capable of manipulating my experience such that I perceive that which does not exist. (3) This omnipotent divine Creator is also capable of interfering with my reasoning faculties in such a way that I never discover a priori truths.
10 René Descartes: The First (4) I cannot rule out the possibility that such an omnipotent divine Creator has not so manipulated my experience or interfered with my reasoning faculties. (5) Given (1) through (4), I will regard my perceptions or what seems true by the light of my reason as false.
11 René Descartes: The First Descartes amends this scenario so that it includes a reference to an omnipotent malicious demon rather than God. This, contends Descartes, is in deference to the view that God is incapable of deception or malice (FP, p.149). Note another indication that Descartes is not a skeptic about our knowledge of the world. The method of doubt is now ready to be applied.
12 René Descartes: The Second The Second begins with Descartes now applying his method of doubt in the hopes of finding some certain truth. Note that if this truth is to be found it must be a priori in nature. Why?
13 René Descartes: The Second The third stage of doubt demolishes all beliefs except the belief that I exist. On the one hand, even if I convince myself that nothing exists or my a priori reflections are false, I must exist to be so convinced. On the other hand, even if my very idea that I have so convinced myself is an effect of the omnipotent and malicious demon doing his dastardly best, I must still exist to be so deceived (FP, p.150).
14 René Descartes: The Second So after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind (FP, p.150). Is Descartes right here?
15 René Descartes: The Second Descartes warns against moving too fast here. Even if the proposition I am, I exist is necessarily true when it is conceived in my mind, I know nothing yet about who or what this I is. Descartes suggests that in order to know anything about this I a priori, and at this stage that is all that is open to us, we should apply the method of doubt to our common conception of ourselves and look for any truth that survives the process.
16 René Descartes: The Second He suggests that his pre-reflective view of himself was of an individual made up of a body and a soul. He admits that his view of the nature of his soul was vague, but not his view of his body (FP, pp ).
17 René Descartes: The Second Applying the method of doubt Descartes contends that a belief that he has a body (and all that that entails) must be regarded as false since it is something that can be doubted to exist under the scenario where he is being deceived by an omnipotent malicious demon. Applying the method of doubt to his belief about a soul he contends that all that cannot be doubted is that there are thoughts (after all the doubts considered as thoughts must exist) (FP, p.151).
18 René Descartes: The Second All that I can know a priori and with certainty about my soul is that when I think there are thoughts and a thinker. Thus when I think, I must exist. When I exist, I do so as a thinking thing (FP, p.151). Is he right? At the bottom of page 151 and top of page 152 in your FP Descartes seems to claim that the view that the thoughts that must be admitted to exist even at this stage of doubt are unified in an I or thinker (i.e. thinking thing) is self-evident. Is he right?
19 René Descartes: The Second Note he does not deny that he may be more than this. He does not deny that he may be embodied. He just can t claim it as known at the present stage of doubt.
20 René Descartes: The Second This I is Descartes first example of a clear and distinct idea. His second suggested clear and distinct idea falls out of analyzing a piece of bees wax (FP, p.152). This analysis does triple duty here. (i) He is trying to highlight the faculty by which he, and we, can know the I which must exist, when there is thought. (ii) He is showing how we can generate clear and distinct ideas of things other than our soul. (iii) He is showing that our knowledge of other bodies is less certain than our knowledge that we exist.
21 René Descartes: The Second He asks you to imagine the wax as he describes it fresh from the honeycomb. Then he asks you to imagine it after it melts when placed close to a nearby fire. We are, in this scenario, still inclined to talk of the melted wax as the same thing that had wholly other sensible qualities before it was placed near the fire.
22 René Descartes: The Second Descartes suggests that this tells us that the wax as a body, and the referent for our term, is not to be identified with the sensible qualities before or after it was melted by the nearby fire. (Nor is it to be identified with both sets of qualities.) What s more, as the wax as a body does not consist of any sensible qualities, our belief that it is a body does not arise from our senses. What can we know of this body from this experiment? That it is extended (has shape), is flexible and that it can change (FP, p.152).
23 René Descartes: The Second Our belief about these properties cannot, Descartes argues, be the product of our imagination. We cannot, after all, imagine all the changes this body is capable of, though we can intellectually grasp its potential to so change. This points to the mind or reason as the origin of the perception of wax as a body, extended, flexible and capable of change. It is the result of purely mental scrutiny (FP, p.153).
24 René Descartes: The Second He concludes this by pointing out that knowledge of the wax as a body must still be predicated on my perception of it. Even if my perception of it as a body, as clear as it now is, turns out to be false (because I do not perceive anything at all), I cannot doubt that I seem to be perceiving it. From this I cannot, at that moment, doubt
25 René Descartes: The Second Even if my perception of it is veridical, the same is still true. A veridical perception of another body also testifies to my own existence as a thinking, or perceiving thing. Once again, my existence as a thinking thing enjoys more certainty (FP, p.153).
26 Some preliminary remarks about W.K. Clifford He was born in 1845 and died in Clifford was an English mathematician. Your reading represents his attempt to defend the claim that we all have a duty of belief, namely that we should not believe on the basis of insufficient evidence. This is a version of evidentialism, the view that our beliefs are justified if and only if they are supported by evidence in our possession. The notion of justification for Clifford carries moral import. (Not all evidentialists would agree.)
27 Clifford: The stories of the irresponsible ship owner and the slandering agitators Purpose of these stories: To elicit your judgment that we have a duty not to believe on insufficient evidence, or by unreliable means. They involve, according to Clifford, immoral believing on the part of the relevant actors in the stories. Clifford thinks that (1) we will agree that the individuals concerned believed wrongly, and that (2) this implies a duty of belief.
28 Clifford: The stories of the irresponsible ship owner and the slandering agitators Do note that Clifford is not trying to get you to commit to a particular moral theory of right or wrong, though he will introduce consequential considerations for why belief on insufficient evidence is wrong.
29 Clifford: The story of the irresponsible ship owner Some elements of the story of the irresponsible ship owner to note: (1) He has evidence that undermines the reasonableness of a belief that the ship is safe or sea worthy. (2) This evidence generates doubts about the safety or sea worthiness of the ship. (3) He overcomes his doubts through an appeal to various reasons. (4) The ship, not surprisingly, sinks.
30 Clifford: The story of the irresponsible ship owner Clifford thinks that the ship owner goes wrong by stiffling his doubts using reasons that are insufficient to justify the belief that the ship is safe or sea worthy. The ship owner has no right to believe on such evidence as was before him (CP, 2). Do note that Clifford thinks that this judgment about the ship owner s ill gained belief would not change even if it were the case that the ship, in this and subsequent trips, didn t sink (see CP, p.2). Is he right?
31 Clifford: The story of the slandering agitators Some of the elements of the story of the slandering agitators to note: (1) There were widespread rumors regarding the immoral actions of teachers and members of a local heretical religious movement. (2) These rumors are believed by outside members of the community. (3) A society is formed to agitate the government into action against this religious movement.
32 Clifford: The story of the slandering agitators (4) They publicly make grave accusations against respected members of this movement. (5) A Government Commission is struck to investigate the accusations. (6) The accusations are false. (7) The truth about the religious movement could have been easily discovered by those in society of agitators. (8) Consequently, these agitators lose their respectability in the community.
33 Clifford: The story of the slandering agitators Clifford thinks that where the slandering agitators go wrong is in being epistemically lazy. Their sincerity of belief was ill-gained. Sincerity alone, then, is not good enough in matters of belief. Clifford thinks that if the story is changed, so that the agitators were accidentally right, we would still judge them wrong to believe on the grounds before them (see CP, p.2).
34 Clifford on why it is not merely the action which is to be blamed Clifford considers the possibility that it is the actions which we are judging negatively rather than the beliefs. It may be thought that regardless of your beliefs (and your lack of control over [some of] them) you have a duty to ensure you are right about x, before acting on the basis of one or more of your beliefs about x.
35 Clifford on why it is not merely the action which is to be blamed Clifford responds in two ways: (1) You cannot sufficiently separate any given belief S may hold from her accompanying actions. The reprehensibility, or praise, of S s actions also attach to the beliefs that give rise to the actions. (2) This will be an insufficient analysis of our duty because we cannot fairly or openly evaluate, or remain open to the evaluations of, beliefs we have already adopted (CP, pp.2-3).
36 Clifford on reasons for why we have a duty of belief Clifford provides the following reasons for why we have duties of belief. (1) Beliefs formed on insufficient grounds will have their toll on your subsequent choices and actions. This is because beliefs have what we might christen behavioral import. Ill gained beliefs will give rise to, or contribute to, poor choices in action (CP, p.3).
37 Clifford on reasons for why we have a duty of belief (2) By not properly investigating our beliefs we risk not only acting immorally in the future, but we make it easier for ourselves to form bad intellectual habits (CP, p.3-4). (3) Your judgments are not merely a private matter. Those beliefs you form are eventually manifested in the public sphere, either in speech or action/inaction. Subsequently, you have some (perhaps a great deal) of influence on the beliefs that others form, and their subsequent actions (CP, p.3).
38 Clifford on reasons for why we have a duty of belief (4) In the light of (2) and (3), we run the risk of our own self-created credulity spreading to the greater human community (CP, p.4). (5) This lack of care in believing, when it becomes public, may also backfire against our long-term intellectual and physical welfare (or that of our progeny). In encouraging those around us to have as little care as ourselves in their believing we risk creating a society of liars or exaggerators. Alternatively, by placing ill gained beliefs in the public arena we may mislead others to their own detriment (or the detriment of their and our progeny) (CP, p.4).
Epistemology. Theory of Knowledge
Epistemology Theory of Knowledge Epistemological Questions What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know x? What
More informationFrom Descartes to Locke. Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality
From Descartes to Locke Consciousness Knowledge Science Reality Brains in Vats What is the point? The point of the brain in a vat story is not to convince us that we might actually be brains in vats, But
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationCartesian Rationalism
Cartesian Rationalism René Descartes 1596-1650 Reason tells me to trust my senses Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong! From 1604-1612 he
More informationClass #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The Story of the Sun
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes, The Story of the Wax Descartes, The
More informationthat the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However,
1 Should there exist a criteria for formulating and justifying a belief? W.K. Clifford believes that the only way a belief can be justified is if it is based on sufficient evidence. However, William James
More informationCARTESIANISM, NEO-REIDIANISM, AND THE A PRIORI: REPLY TO PUST
CARTESIANISM, NEO-REIDIANISM, AND THE A PRIORI: REPLY TO PUST Gregory STOUTENBURG ABSTRACT: Joel Pust has recently challenged the Thomas Reid-inspired argument against the reliability of the a priori defended
More information! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.
! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! What is the relation between that knowledge and that given in the sciences?! Key figure: René
More informationMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY. Rene Descartes. in which are demonstrated the existence of God and the distinction between
MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes in which are demonstrated the existence of God and the distinction between the human soul and the body FIRST MEDITATION What can be called into doubt [1]
More informationDefinitions of Gods of Descartes and Locke
Assignment of Introduction to Philosophy Definitions of Gods of Descartes and Locke June 7, 2015 Kenzo Fujisue 1. Introduction Through lectures of Introduction to Philosophy, I studied that Christianity
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationPlantinga, Pluralism and Justified Religious Belief
Plantinga, Pluralism and Justified Religious Belief David Basinger (5850 total words in this text) (705 reads) According to Alvin Plantinga, it has been widely held since the Enlightenment that if theistic
More informationMeditation 1: On what can be doubted
Meditation 1: On what can be doubted Descartes begins the First Meditation by noting that there are many things he once believed to be true that he has later learned were not. This leads him to worry which
More informationFrom Brains in Vats.
From Brains in Vats. To God; And even to Myself, To a Malicious Demon; But, with I am, I exist (or Cogito ergo sum, i.e., I think therefore I am ), we have found the ultimate foundation. The place where
More informationFrom Brains in Vats.
From Brains in Vats. To God; To a Evil Genius; And even to Myself; What can know? What can we doubt? The search for certainty René Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy In which are demonstrated the
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Introduction to Philosophy Instructor: Jason Sheley Quiz True or False? 1. Descartes believes that the possibility of veridical dreams undermines our faith in our senses. 2. Descartes believes that the
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes 2: The Cogito Jeremy Dunham Descartes Meditations A Recap of Meditation 1 First Person Narrative From Empiricism to Rationalism The Withholding Principle Local Doubt
More informationKANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.
KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON The law is reason unaffected by desire. Aristotle, Politics Book III (1287a32) THE BIG IDEAS TO MASTER Kantian formalism Kantian constructivism
More informationEpistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?
Epistemology a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge (Dictionary.com v 1.1). Epistemology attempts to answer the question how do we know what
More informationWittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence. Abstract
Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence Edoardo Zamuner Abstract This paper is concerned with the answer Wittgenstein gives to a specific version of the sceptical problem of other minds.
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 12: 2-15 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (full.pdf) 2. Next week a. Locke, An Essay
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2010 Class 3 - Meditations Two and Three too much material, but we ll do what we can Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
More informationWhat is knowledge? How do good beliefs get made?
What is knowledge? How do good beliefs get made? We are users of our cognitive systems Our cognitive (belief-producing) systems (e.g. perception, memory and inference) largely run automatically. We find
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2013 Russell Marcus Class #4 - Sense Experience Descartes and Locke Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Slide 1 Business P Writing Center P Presentation
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 11: 2-13 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy (full.pdf) 2. Next time a. Descartes, Meditations
More information- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is
BonJour I PHIL410 BonJour s Moderate Rationalism - BonJour develops and defends a moderate form of Rationalism. - Rationalism, generally (as used here), is the view according to which the primary tool
More informationFourth Meditation: Truth and falsity
Fourth Meditation: Truth and falsity In these past few days I have become used to keeping my mind away from the senses; and I have become strongly aware that very little is truly known about bodies, whereas
More informationIntro to Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Intro to Philosophy Instructor: Jason Sheley Quiz: True or False? 1) According to Glaucon, if given the Ring, the unjust and just person will behave the same way. 2) Socrates assumes that a person in the
More informationThe Problem Of Enthusiasm 1 by: John Locke ( )
The Problem Of Enthusiasm 1 by: John Locke (1632-1704) Translation, format corrections, additions and footnotes by Barry F. Vaughan 1. The love of truth is necessary. Anyone who would seriously go searching
More informationHOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES. Gabriela Gorescu. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of
HOBBES S DECEIVING GOD: THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THOMAS HOBBES AND RENE DESCARTES Gabriela Gorescu Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2015 APPROVED: Richard
More informationThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the problem of skepticism as the
Hinge Conditions: An Argument Against Skepticism by Blake Barbour I. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to introduce the problem of skepticism as the Transmissibility Argument represents it and
More informationSo how does Descartes doubt everything?
Descartes and the First Two Meditations 9/15 I. Descartes Motivations - Descartes begins the meditations by mentioning that he was taught and accepted many falsehoods in his youth, and that his beliefs
More informationA Priori Bootstrapping
A Priori Bootstrapping Ralph Wedgwood In this essay, I shall explore the problems that are raised by a certain traditional sceptical paradox. My conclusion, at the end of this essay, will be that the most
More informationEpistemological Foundations for Koons Cosmological Argument?
Epistemological Foundations for Koons Cosmological Argument? Koons (2008) argues for the very surprising conclusion that any exception to the principle of general causation [i.e., the principle that everything
More informationMeditations on First Philosophy in which are demonstrated the existence of God and the distinction between the human soul and body
Meditations on First Philosophy in which are demonstrated the existence of God and the distinction between the human soul and body René Descartes Copyright Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets]
More informationReason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,
Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 208. Price 60.) In this interesting book, Ted Poston delivers an original and
More informationVarieties of Apriority
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
More informationReligious Experience. Well, it feels real
Religious Experience Well, it feels real St. Teresa of Avila/Jesus 1515-1582 Non-visual experience I was at prayer on a festival of the glorious Saint Peter when I saw Christ at my side or, to put it better,
More informationTestimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction
24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy. Spring 2017
Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2017 Elements of The Matrix The Matrix obviously has a lot of interesting parallels, themes, philosophical points, etc. For this class, the most interesting are the religious
More informationComments on Carl Ginet s
3 Comments on Carl Ginet s Self-Evidence Juan Comesaña* There is much in Ginet s paper to admire. In particular, it is the clearest exposition that I know of a view of the a priori based on the idea that
More informationWHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI?
Diametros nr 28 (czerwiec 2011): 1-7 WHAT DOES KRIPKE MEAN BY A PRIORI? Pierre Baumann In Naming and Necessity (1980), Kripke stressed the importance of distinguishing three different pairs of notions:
More informationW. K. CLIFFORD AND WILLIAM JAMES ON DOXASTIC NORMS
W. K. CLIFFORD AND WILLIAM JAMES ON DOXASTIC NORMS Alberto OYA Abstract The main aim of this paper is to explain and analyze the debate between W. K. Clifford ( The Ethics of Belief, 1877) and William
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy
Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2014 Russell Marcus Class #3 - Illusion Descartes, from Meditations on First Philosophy Marcus, Introduction to Philosophy, Fall 2014 Slide 1 Business P
More informationPROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER
PROSPECTS FOR A JAMESIAN EXPRESSIVISM 1 JEFF KASSER In order to take advantage of Michael Slater s presence as commentator, I want to display, as efficiently as I am able, some major similarities and differences
More informationTheories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and
1 Internalism and externalism about justification Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and externalist. Internalist theories of justification say that whatever
More informationGREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18
GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid (1710-1796) Peter West 25/09/18 Some context Aristotle (384-322 BCE) Lucretius (c. 99-55 BCE) Thomas Reid (1710-1796 AD) 400 BCE 0 Much of (Western) scholastic philosophy
More informationTHE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009
Lying & Deception Definitions and Discussion Three constructions Do not lie has the special status of a moral law, which means that it is always wrong to lie, no matter what the circumstances. In Kant
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationIn Defense of Radical Empiricism. Joseph Benjamin Riegel. Chapel Hill 2006
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationIntroduction to Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Introduction to Philosophy Instructor: Jason Sheley Consider: Does it matter whether Descartes is able to give an answer to the problem of Global Skepticism? Opening puzzle: The Experience Machine Would
More informationWHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.
WHAT IS HUME S FORK? www.prshockley.org Certainty does not exist in science. I. Introduction: A. Hume divides all objects of human reason into two different kinds: Relation of Ideas & Matters of Fact.
More informationLogic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Logic, Truth & Epistemology Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationKlein on the Unity of Cartesian and Contemporary Skepticism
Klein on the Unity of Cartesian and Contemporary Skepticism Olsson, Erik J Published in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00155.x 2008 Link to publication Citation
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More informationA Priori Skepticism and the KK Thesis
A Priori Skepticism and the KK Thesis James R. Beebe (University at Buffalo) International Journal for the Study of Skepticism (forthcoming) In Beebe (2011), I argued against the widespread reluctance
More informationA Rejection of Skeptical Theism
Conspectus Borealis Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 8 2016 A Rejection of Skeptical Theism Mike Thousand Northern Michigan University, mthousan@nmu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.nmu.edu/conspectus_borealis
More informationIntroductory Kant Seminar Lecture
Introductory Kant Seminar Lecture Intentionality It is not unusual to begin a discussion of Kant with a brief review of some history of philosophy. What is perhaps less usual is to start with a review
More informationThe Skeptic and the Dogmatist
NOÛS 34:4 ~2000! 517 549 The Skeptic and the Dogmatist James Pryor Harvard University I Consider the skeptic about the external world. Let s straightaway concede to such a skeptic that perception gives
More informationRené Descartes ( )
René Descartes (1596-1650) René Descartes René Descartes Method of doubt René Descartes Method of doubt Things you believed that you now know to be false? René Descartes Method of doubt Skeptical arguments
More informationPhilosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
More informationWho Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs?
Who Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs? Issue: Who has the burden of proof the Christian believer or the atheist? Whose position requires supporting
More informationSCHAFFER S DEMON NATHAN BALLANTYNE AND IAN EVANS
SCHAFFER S DEMON by NATHAN BALLANTYNE AND IAN EVANS Abstract: Jonathan Schaffer (2010) has summoned a new sort of demon which he calls the debasing demon that apparently threatens all of our purported
More informationMind and Body. Is mental really material?"
Mind and Body Is mental really material?" René Descartes (1596 1650) v 17th c. French philosopher and mathematician v Creator of the Cartesian co-ordinate system, and coinventor of algebra v Wrote Meditations
More informationSUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION
SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION Stewart COHEN ABSTRACT: James Van Cleve raises some objections to my attempt to solve the bootstrapping problem for what I call basic justification
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
More informationRoots of Psychology Aristotle and Descartes
Roots of Psychology Aristotle and Descartes Aristotle s Hylomorphism Dualism of matter and form A commitment shared with Plato that entities are identified by their form But, unlike Plato, did not accept
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 20 Lecture - 20 Critical Philosophy: Kant s objectives
More informationIN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE
IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE By RICHARD FELDMAN Closure principles for epistemic justification hold that one is justified in believing the logical consequences, perhaps of a specified sort,
More informationNotes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, )
Notes on Bertrand Russell s The Problems of Philosophy (Hackett 1990 reprint of the 1912 Oxford edition, Chapters XII, XIII, XIV, 119-152) Chapter XII Truth and Falsehood [pp. 119-130] Russell begins here
More informationIn essence, Swinburne's argument is as follows:
9 [nt J Phil Re115:49-56 (1984). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague. Printed in the Netherlands. NATURAL EVIL AND THE FREE WILL DEFENSE PAUL K. MOSER Loyola University of Chicago Recently Richard Swinburne
More informationout in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives an argument specifically
That Thing-I-Know-Not-What by [Perm #7903685] The philosopher George Berkeley, in part of his general thesis against materialism as laid out in his Three Dialogues and Principles of Human Knowledge, gives
More informationPHIL220 - Knowledge, Explanation and Understanding. Lachlan Hines June 21, 2014
PHIL220 - Knowledge, Explanation and Understanding Lachlan Hines June 21, 2014 1 Contents I Knowledge 4 1 Overview 5 1.1 Intro.................................. 5 1.1.1 Knowledge..........................
More informationThe Problem of the External World
The Problem of the External World External World Skepticism Consider this painting by Rene Magritte: Is there a tree outside? External World Skepticism Many people have thought that humans are like this
More informationPHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY
PHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception Chapter V. A Version of Foundationalism 1. A Principle of Foundational Justification 1. Mike's view is that there is a
More information1/8. Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God
1/8 Descartes 3: Proofs of the Existence of God Descartes opens the Third Meditation by reminding himself that nothing that is purely sensory is reliable. The one thing that is certain is the cogito. He
More informationHere's a rough guide to topics that we discussed in class and that may come up in the exam.
Contemporary Civilization ~ Fall 2004 STUDY GUIDE FOR FINAL EXAM Here's a rough guide to topics that we discussed in class and that may come up in the exam. Mediaeval Philosophy General problem common
More informationFoundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology
1. Introduction Ryan C. Smith Philosophy 125W- Final Paper April 24, 2010 Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology Throughout this paper, the goal will be to accomplish three
More informationNew Chapter: Epistemology: The Theory and Nature of Knowledge
Intro to Philosophy Phil 110 Lecture 14: 2-22 Daniel Kelly I. Mechanics A. Upcoming Readings 1. Today we ll discuss a. Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding b. Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between
More informationMeditations 1 & 2 by René Descartes (1641) translated by John Cottingham (1984)
Meditations 1 & 2 by René Descartes (1641) translated by John Cottingham (1984) FIRST MEDITATION What can be called into doubt Some years ago I was struck by the large number of falsehoods that I had accepted
More informationDescartes on the separateness of mind and body
Descartes on the separateness of mind and body Jeff Speaks August 23, 2018 1 The method of doubt............................... 1 2 What cannot be doubted............................. 2 3 Why the mind
More informationHigher-Order Epistemic Attitudes and Intellectual Humility. Allan Hazlett. Forthcoming in Episteme
Higher-Order Epistemic Attitudes and Intellectual Humility Allan Hazlett Forthcoming in Episteme Recent discussions of the epistemology of disagreement (Kelly 2005, Feldman 2006, Elga 2007, Christensen
More informationAspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 22 Lecture - 22 Kant The idea of Reason Soul, God
More informationRussell s Problems of Philosophy
Russell s Problems of Philosophy UNIVERSALS & OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THEM F e b r u a r y 2 Today : 1. Review A Priori Knowledge 2. The Case for Universals 3. Universals to the Rescue! 4. On Philosophy Essays
More informationNested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011
Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011 In her book Learning from Words (2008), Jennifer Lackey argues for a dualist view of testimonial
More informationFrom the fact that I cannot think of God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from God, and hence that he really exists.
FIFTH MEDITATION The essence of material things, and the existence of God considered a second time We have seen that Descartes carefully distinguishes questions about a thing s existence from questions
More informationIntroduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
More informationA Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo
A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo "Education is nothing more nor less than learning to think." Peter Facione In this article I review the historical evolution of principles and
More informationThe Reasons of Trust
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published in The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86, no. 2 (June 2008): 213 36, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00048400801886496. The
More informationMeditations on First Philosophy René Descartes
Meditations on First Philosophy René Descartes FIRST MEDITATION On What Can Be Called Into Doubt Some years ago I was struck by how many false things I had believed, and by how doubtful was the structure
More informationa0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University
a0rxh/ On Van Inwagen s Argument Against the Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts WESLEY H. BRONSON Princeton University Imagine you are looking at a pen. It has a blue ink cartridge inside, along with
More informationBerkeley, Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous focus on p. 86 (chapter 9) to the end (p. 93).
TOPIC: Lecture 7.2 Berkeley Lecture Berkeley will discuss why we only have access to our sense-data, rather than the real world. He will then explain why we can trust our senses. He gives an argument for
More informationThe Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works
Page 1 of 60 The Power of Critical Thinking Chapter Objectives Understand the definition of critical thinking and the importance of the definition terms systematic, evaluation, formulation, and rational
More informationThe Solution to Skepticism by René Descartes (1641) from Meditations translated by John Cottingham (1984)
The Solution to Skepticism by René Descartes (1641) from Meditations translated by John Cottingham (1984) MEDITATION THREE: Concerning God, That He Exists I will now shut my eyes, stop up my ears, and
More informationSQUARING THE CARTESIAN CIRCLE
SQUARING THE CARTESIAN CIRCLE Charles Hucnemann University of Illinois at Chicago The lasting objection against Descartes's Meditations seems to be that his reasoning is circular. On the one hand, he uses
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationWelcome back. We are starting a new topic today, a new part of the course.
PHI 110 Lecture 10 1 Welcome back. We are starting a new topic today, a new part of the course. This part of the course we will address the subject of knowledge and specifically what in philosophy is called
More information