SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 Exam Name SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of the other, disjoint sets, or overlapping sets. 1) athletes and high school students 1) Describe how the sentence is ambiguous. 2) There was a 15% decrease in donations to the homeless shelter between 1996 and 2000, a year in which \$50,000 was collected. 2) Decide whether the statement makes sense. Explain your reasoning. 3) I did not convince my friend that I was right, so I must not have argued logically. 3) Create a simple three-line argument for the given form. Choose your example so that it illustrates clearly whether or not the argument is valid. 4) Denying the conclusion 4) The statement connects two individual propositions with the word and. State whether the entire statement is true or false, and explain why. 5) The sun is bigger than the moon and the sun rotates around the earth. 5) 1

2 Decide whether the statement makes sense. Explain your reasoning. 6) The argument is weak, so its conclusion must be false. 6) Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of the other, disjoint sets, or overlapping sets. 7) beverages and soft drinks 7) Draw a Venn diagram to determine whether the argument is valid. 8) Premise: All clowns wear makeup. Premise: Bozo is a clown. Conclusion: Bozo wears makeup. 8) Analyze the situation and explain how you would make a decision. 9) The costs per day of driving to work are \$5 for gas, \$10 for parking, and \$1 for wear-and-tear on the car. Taking the train to work costs \$6.50 each way, plus \$1.50 per day to park at the train station. Should you drive or take the train?" 9) Identify the type of argument and determine its validity with a Venn diagram. 10) Premise: If you try hard, then you will succeed. Premise: You did not try hard. Conclusion: You will not succeed. 10) Decide whether the statement makes sense. Explain your reasoning. 11) Insurance policy A costs \$250 and has no deductible. Insurance policy B costs \$275 and has a \$500 yearly deductible. Candace thinks the extra \$25 per month is worth it to get the \$500 deductible, so she buys policy B. 11) 2

3 Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of the other, disjoint sets, or overlapping sets. 12) motor vehicles and cars 12) A categorical proposition is given. If it is not already in standard form, rephrase it. State the subject and predicate sets, and draw a Venn diagram for the proposition. Label all regions of the diagram clearly. 13) All horses are animals. 13) Decide whether the statement makes sense. Explain your reasoning. 14) If "unconscious" means "not located in the United States," then Florida is not unconscious. 14) MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Use braces to write the members of the set, or state that the set has no members. 15) The whole numbers greater than 3 and less than 7 15) A) {3, 4, 5, 6, 7} B) {4, 5, 6} C) {3, 4, 5, 6} D) {4, 5, 6, 7} Choose the first set in the list natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, and real numbers that describes the following number. 16) ) A) Rational numbers B) Natural numbers C) Integers D) Real numbers Rephrase the statement as a conditional proposition with the form "if p, then q." 17) Being in California is sufficient for being in Los Angeles. 17) A) If you are in Los Angeles, then you are in California. B) If you are in California, then you are in Los Angeles. C) If you are in California, then you are not in Los Angeles. D) If you are in Los Angeles, then you might be in California. Evaluate the validity of the chain of conditionals. 18) Premise: If I pay my bills on time, then my credit will be good. Premise: If my credit is good, then I will become a movie star. Conclusion: If I pay my bills on time, then I will become a movie star. A) Valid B) Invalid 18) 3

4 The argument given or described involves some kind of fallacy. Identify the fallacy. 19) A television commercial shows two people who fall in love while wearing a certain brand of blue jeans. A) Appeal to ignorance B) Limited choice C) Appeal to emotion D) Hasty generalization 19) Determine whether the statement is true or false. 20) If Florida is in the United States, then all squares are rectangles. 20) A) True B) False The argument given or described involves some kind of fallacy. Identify the fallacy. 21) You should brush your teeth every day because brushing your teeth is very important. 21) A) False cause B) Hasty generalization C) Diversion (red herring) D) Circular reasoning 22) One candidate favors eliminating affirmative action programs. The other candidate states: My opponent doesn't think there's anything wrong with discrimination." A) Limited choice B) Personal attack (ad hominem) C) Hasty generalization D) Straw man 22) Determine whether the statement is true or false. 23) If a triangle is a parallelogram, then all rectangles are squares. 23) A) True B) False State whether or is being used in the exclusive or inclusive sense in the given statement. 24) The insurance policy will not cover misuse or acts of God. 24) A) Inclusive B) Exclusive Make a truth table for the given statement. The letters p, q, r, s represent propositions. 25) if q, then not r 25) A) B) q r if q, then not r q r if q, then not r T T F T F T F T F F T F C) D) q r if q, then not r T T F T F T F T T F F T q r if q, then not r F T T F F T Determine whether the statement is true or false. 26) If Florida is in the United States, then all rectangles are squares. 26) A) True B) False Use braces to write the members of the set, or state that the set has no members. 27) The integers from 4 to 8 (inclusive) 27) A) {5, 6, 7} B) {4, 5, 6, 7, 8} C) {5, 6, 7, 8} D) {4, 5, 6, 7} 4

5 Solve the problem. 28) The following Venn diagram describes the cars on a used car lot. Use it to determine how many Fords are on the lot. 28) A) 17 B) 20 C) 23 D) 30 Make a truth table for the given statement. The letters p, q, r, s represent propositions. 29) p or q 29) A) B) C) D) p q p or q F T F p q p or q T T F F T F F F T p q p or q T F T F T T p q p or q F T T 5

6 Answer Key Testname: PRACTICE EXAM #1 1) The sets are overlapping. It is possible for a person to be both an athlete and a high school students, but not all athletes are high school students and not all high school students are athletes. 2) It is unclear whether the year in which \$50,000 was collected was 1996 or ) Does not make sense. Arguing logically may not change the other person's position, but it can help the other person understand you, and vice versa. (Explanations will vary.) 4) Answers will vary. The structure of the argument should be as follows: Premise: If p, then q. Premise: q is not true. Conclusion: p is not true. The argument is valid. 5) False. Is is true that the sun is bigger than the moon, but it is not true that the sun rotates around the earth. (The earth rotates around the sun.) Since one of the individual propositions if false, the conjunction is false. 6) Does not make sense. The strength of an inductive argument is not necessarily related to the truth of its conclusion. The argument "The earth rotates around the sun because I said so" is extremely weak, but its conclusion happens to be true. For a long time people found the argument "The sun rotates around the earth" to be quite compelling, but its conclusion turned out to be false. (Explanations will vary.) 7) The set "soft drinks" is a subset of the set "beverages." All soft drinks are beverages, but some beverages (e.g., water) are not soft drinks. 6

7 Answer Key Testname: PRACTICE EXAM #1 8) The X represents Bozo. The conclusion follows necessarily from the premises, and the argument is valid. 9) Answers may vary. One possibility: Since driving costs \$16 (\$5 + \$10 + \$1 = \$16) per day and taking the train costs \$14.50 (\$ \$1.50 = \$14.50) per day, it appears that taking the train is a better option. However, you should also consider other factors. If you have a spouse who might need the car during the day, then that's another reason to take the train (that would also save you the \$1.50 parking fee). If you take the train, you might be able to read the newspaper or do work on the way to work. However, if the train tends to be crowded and you prefer being alone, then it might be worth the extra \$1.50 per day to drive. 10) The type of argument is called Denying the Hypothesis. We have p = you try hard and q = you will succeed. The second premise asserts that p is false for you, which we show by putting an X outside the p circle. However, we do not know whether the X should also be outside the q circle, because the premise says nothing about whether you succeeded. Thus, we put the X on the border of the q circle. The Venn diagram shows that the premises do not lead necessarily to the conclusion, so the argument is invalid. It is possible that, despite your not trying hard, you might still succeed. 11) Does not make sense. Candace is paying an additional \$25 per month (\$300 per year) to get a \$500 deductible. However the deductible (what you pay out of pocket before the insurance kicks in) is a cost, not a benefit! All other things being equal, policy A is clearly the better deal. (Explanations will vary.) 7

8 Answer Key Testname: PRACTICE EXAM #1 12) The set "cars" is a subset of the set "motor vehicles." Every car is a motor vehicle, but there are some motor vehicles, such as trucks, that are not cars. 13) The subject set is "horses" and the predicate set is "animals." 14) Makes sense. You might think the statement does not make sense since the definition of "unconscious" is not actually "not located in the United States"and the assertion about Florida does not, on its own, make sense. However, the only question is whether if the definition were correct, the assertion about Florida would be correct. If "unconscious" means "not located in the United States," then "Florida is not unconscious" could be rephrased as "Florida is not not located in the United States" and then, replacing the double negation, "Florida is located in the United States." That assertion is clearly true. (Explanations will vary.) 15) B 16) A 17) B 18) A 19) C 20) A 21) D 22) D 23) A 24) A 25) C 26) B 27) B 28) C 29) C 8

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4 Summary Notes These are summary notes so that you can really listen in class and not spend the entire time copying notes. These notes will not substitute for reading the

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Study Guides Chapter 1 - Basic Training Argument: A group of propositions is an argument when one or more of the propositions in the group is/are used to give evidence (or if you like, reasons, or grounds)

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church http://www.fbcweb.org/doctrines.html September 8, 2011 Building Mental Muscle & Growing the Mind through Logic Exercises: Lesson 4a The Three Acts of the

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Chapter 6: Categorical Syllogisms Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide A. Standard-form Categorical Syllogisms A categorical syllogism is an argument containing three categorical propositions: two premises

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms Consider Argument 1 and Argument 2, and select the option that correctly identifies the valid argument(s), if any. Argument 1 All bears are omnivores. All omnivores

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University Overall Plan First, I will present some problematic propositions and

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

2 4 Deductive Reasoning Learning Targets: I understand deductive reasoning I can use the Law of Detachment I can use a Venn diagram to draw conclusions I can use the Law of Syllogism What other evidence

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010 LIBERALLY EDUCATED PEOPLE......RESPECT RIGOR NOT SO MUCH FOR ITS OWN SAKE BUT AS A WAY OF SEEKING TRUTH. LOGIC PUZZLE COOPER IS MURDERED. 3 SUSPECTS: SMITH, JONES,

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Deduction Deductive arguments, deduction, deductive logic all means the same thing. They are different ways of referring to the same style of reasoning Deduction is just one mode of reasoning, but it is

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University 2012 CONTENTS Part I Critical Thinking Chapter 1 Basic Training 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Logic, Propositions and Arguments 1.3 Deduction and Induction

Reading and Evaluating Arguments Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments To recognize errors in logical reasoning An argument

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Deductive arguments are commonly used in various kinds of academic writing. In order to be able to perform a critique of deductive arguments, we will need to understand their basic structure. As will be

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1 W# Section (10 or 11) 1. True or False (5 points) Directions: Circle the letter next to the best answer. 1. T F All true statements are valid. 2. T

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

M05_COI1396_13_E_C05.QXD 11/13/07 8:39 AM age 182 182 CHATER 5 Categorical ropositions Categorical propositions are the fundamental elements, the building blocks of argument, in the classical account of

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process

Instructor s Manual 1

Instructor s Manual 1 PREFACE This instructor s manual will help instructors prepare to teach logic using the 14th edition of Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, and Kenneth McMahon s Introduction to Logic. The

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

1 HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Argument Recognition 2 II. Argument Analysis 3 1. Identify Important Ideas 3 2. Identify Argumentative Role of These Ideas 4 3. Identify Inferences 5 4. Reconstruct the

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Critical Thinking The Very Basics (at least as I see them) Dona Warren Department of Philosophy The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point What You ll Learn Here I. How to recognize arguments II. How to

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Prof. C. Byrne Dept. of Philosophy SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC Syllogistic logic is the original form in which formal logic was developed; hence it is sometimes also referred to as Aristotelian logic after Aristotle,

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning First Steps to Analyzing an Argument In the following slides, some simple arguments will be given. The steps to begin analyzing each argument

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

Lecture 9: Propositional Logic I Philosophy 130 1 & 3 November 2016 O Rourke & Gibson I. Administrative A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November B. I am working on the group

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 Propositions A proposition is a statement that can be true or false. Propositions are sometimes called

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information

National Quali cations

H SPECIMEN S85/76/ National Qualications ONLY Philosophy Paper Date Not applicable Duration hour 5 minutes Total marks 50 SECTION ARGUMENTS IN ACTION 30 marks Attempt ALL questions. SECTION KNOWLEDGE AND

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments 1 Agenda 1. What is an Argument? 2. Evaluating Arguments 3. Validity 4. Soundness 5. Persuasive Arguments 6.

Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting.

Improving Students' "Dialectic Tracking" Skills (Diagramming Complex Arguments) Cathal Woods for 2010 AAPT Meeting. My e-mail: cathalwoods at gmail dot com. Contact for a copy of my logic book, or go to

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments Week 4: Propositional Logic and Truth Tables Lecture 4.1: Introduction to deductive logic Deductive arguments = presented as being valid, and successful only

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Logic Book Part 1 by Skylar Ruloff Contents Introduction 3 I Validity and Soundness 4 II Argument Forms 10 III Counterexamples and Categorical Statements 15 IV Strength and Cogency 21 2 Introduction This

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

Analysis Breaking down an idea, concept, theory, etc. into its most basic parts in order to get a better understanding of its structure. This is necessary to evaluate the merits of the claim properly (is

HW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011

HW #3-SOLUTIONS Topics: Sets, categorical propositions, Venn diagrams, analyzing arguments, and critical thinking Please show your work and clearly indicate your answer. Although you are welcome to compare

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Spring 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premisses. 2. A conclusion is a statement of support. 3. An easy way to determine

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

PHI 103 - Introduction Lecture 4 An Overview of the wo Branches of Logic he wo Branches of Logic Argument - at least two statements where one provides logical support for the other. I. Deduction - a conclusion

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms Unit 5 John Venn 1834 1923 English logician and philosopher noted for introducing the Venn diagram Used in set theory, probability, logic, statistics, and computer

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

A Short Course in Logic Example 3 I) Recognizing Arguments III) Evaluating Arguments II) Analyzing Arguments Bad Argument: Bad Inference Identifying the Parts of the Argument Premises Inferences Diagramming

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES LECTURE CONTENTS LECTURE 1: CLAIMS, EXPLAINATIONS AND ARGUMENTS LECTURE 2: CONDITIONS AND DEDUCTION LECTURE 3: MORE DEDUCTION LECTURE 4: MEANING

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic Name Period Date Symbolic notation: 1. Define the following symbols. a b ~ c d e g a b c d a b c d 2. Consider the following legend: Let p = You love bananas. Let

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims In the previous tutorial we saw that the standard of acceptability of a statement (or premise) depends on the context. In certain contexts we may only require

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Review Deductive Logic Wk2 Day 2 Checking Validity of Deductive Argument Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism Identify premises and conclusion. Look out for unstated premises. Place them in order P(1), P(2),

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples Section 1.1 Propositional Logic Page references correspond to locations of Extra Examples icons in the textbook. p.2, icon at

1.2. What is said: propositions

1.2. What is said: propositions 1.2.0. Overview In 1.1.5, we saw the close relation between two properties of a deductive inference: (i) it is a transition from premises to conclusion that is free of any

Recall. Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true. Soundness. Valid; and. Premises are true

Recall Validity: If the premises are true the conclusion must be true Soundness Valid; and Premises are true Validity In order to determine if an argument is valid, we must evaluate all of the sets of

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 1 of 8 What does logic tell us about conditional statements? When I surveyed the class a couple of days ago, many

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments What You Will Learn Symbolic arguments Standard forms of arguments 3.5-2 Symbolic Arguments A symbolic argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. It is called

L4: Reasoning. Dani Navarro

L4: Reasoning Dani Navarro Deductive reasoning Inductive reasoning Informal reasoning WE talk of man* being the rational animal; and the traditional intellectualist philosophy has always made a great point

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons I. Introduction: (1 day) Look at p. 1 in the textbook with your child and learn how to use the math book effectively. DO:

b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

Explanation for Question 1 in Quiz 8 by Norva Lo - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 9:39 AM The following is the solution for Question 1 in Quiz 8: (a) Which term in the argument is being equivocated. (b) What

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions Date Study questions. These questions do not have easy answers. (But that doesn't mean that they have no answers.) Just think about these issues. There is no particular

Syllogism. Exam Importance Exam Importance. CAT Very Important IBPS/Bank PO Very Important. XAT Very Important BANK Clerk Very Important

1 About Disha publication One of the leading publishers in India, Disha Publication provides books and study materials for schools and various competitive exams being continuously held across the country.

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT Deduction Fallacies Term Definition Example(s) 1 Equivocation Ambiguity 2 types: The word or phrase may be ambiguous, in which case it has more than one distinct meaning

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

TOPIC: You need to be able to: Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). Organize arguments that we read into a proper argument

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Logic Aristotle is the first philosopher to study systematically what we call logic Specifically, Aristotle investigated what we now

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Defining induction... 2 3.0 Induction versus deduction... 2 4.0 Hume's descriptive

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Fall 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. The inclusive "or" means "A or B or both A and B." 2. The conclusion contains both the major term and the middle term. 3. "If, then" statements

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

1 A Brief Introduction to Key Terms 5 A Brief Introduction to Key Terms 1.1 Arguments Arguments crop up in conversations, political debates, lectures, editorials, comic strips, novels, television programs,

In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the

The Flow of Argument Lecture 9 In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the central concept of validity. Visualizing syllogisms in terms of three-circle Venn diagrams gave us

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Russell Marcus Hamilton College, Fall 2013 Class 1 - Introduction to Introduction to Philosophy My name is Russell. My office is 202 College Hill Road, Room 210.

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning................... 3 1.1.1 Strong Syllogism......................... 3 1.1.2 Weak Syllogism.......................... 4 1.1.3 Transitivity

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

19 Chapter 3 19 CHAPTER 3: Logic Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them. The last proceeding of reason is to recognize

National Quali cations SPECIMEN ONLY. Date of birth Scottish candidate number

N5FOR OFFICIAL USE S854/75/01 National Quali cations SPECIMEN ONLY Mark Philosophy Date Not applicable Duration 2 hours 20 minutes *S8547501* Fill in these boxes and read what is printed below. Full name

Identify the subject and predicate terms in, and name the form of, each of the following propositions.

M05_COPI1396_13_SE_C05.QXD 10/12/07 9:00 PM Page 187 5.4 Quality, Quantity, and Distribution 187 EXERCISES Identify the subject and predicate terms in, and name the form of, each of the following propositions.

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Overview Philosophy & logic 1.2 What is philosophy? 1.3 nature of philosophy Why philosophy Rules of engagement Punctuality and regularity is of the essence You should be active in class It is good to

Test Item File. Full file at

Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Neils Bohr (1885 1962) to Einstein: You are not thinking. You are merely being logical. Reason is one of the four ways of knowing: Perception Language Emotion

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

Handout 1 ELEMENTS OF LOGIC 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions In our day to day lives, we find ourselves arguing with other people. Sometimes we want someone to do or accept something as true

MITOCW Lec 2 MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010

MITOCW Lec 2 MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

An Introduction to Formal Logic Second edition Peter Smith February 27, 2019 Peter Smith 2018. Not for re-posting or re-circulation. Comments and corrections please to ps218 at cam dot ac dot uk 1 What

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 2017/18 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument General Overview: As our students often attest, we all live in a complex world filled with demanding issues and bewildering challenges. In order to determine those

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination,

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

PRACTICAL LOGIC Bryan Rennie GENERAL NOTES ON THE CLASS EXPLANATION OF GRADES AND POINTS, ETC. SAMPLE QUIZZES SCHEDULE OF CLASSES THE SIX RULES OF SYLLOGISMS (and corresponding fallacies) SYMBOLS USED

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall Stetson University Chapter 8 - Sentential ruth ables and Argument orms 8.1 Introduction he truth-value of a given truth-functional compound proposition depends

Logic Practice Test 1

Logic Practice Test 1 Name True or False 1. Implying is said to be analogous to hearing. 2. Opinions can be mistaken, but knowledge cannot. 3. According to the book, whatever a person thinks is true is

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations

6. Truth and Possible Worlds

6. Truth and Possible Worlds We have defined logical entailment, consistency, and the connectives,,, all in terms of belief. In view of the close connection between belief and truth, described in the first

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics It is useful to think of an argument as a list of sentences.[1] The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises. Thus: (1) No professors

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing Logical relations Deductive logic Claims to provide conclusive support for the truth of a conclusion Inductive

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

BASIC ARGUMENTATION Alfred Snider, University of Vermont World Schools Debate Academy, Slovenia, 2015 Induction, deduction, causation, fallacies INDUCTION Definition: studying a sufficient number of analogous

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

1 2 3 4 5 6 Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference of opinion. Often heated. A statement of

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise