How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)"

Transcription

1 How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very) NIU should require all students to pass a comprehensive exam in order to graduate because such exams have been shown to be effective for improving achievement and marketability. For instance, a five-year study by the National Scholarship Achievement Board found that the grade point average of undergraduates at universities adopting a comprehensive graduation exam increased by 31% while schools without comprehensive exams showed no improvement during the same period. The study also found that graduating seniors from schools with a comprehensive exam received 20% higher salaries and were 35% more likely to get a job upon graduation than seniors who came from colleges without comprehensive exams. Therefore, NIU should institute a comprehensive exam policy.

2 Ignoring counter-claims makes arguments less persuasive Many students reading this argument might not feel this argument to be very persuasive because they can think of objections to a comprehensive exam policy that are not addressed by the author. List some objections to comprehensive exams

3 Ignoring counter-claims makes arguments less persuasive Many students reading this argument might not feel this argument to be very persuasive because they can think of objections to a comprehensive exam policy that are not addressed by the author. List some objections to comprehensive exams Comprehensive exams can be stressful for some students an unnecessary burden might lower graduation rates making the school less attractive to new applicants

4 Ignoring counter-claims makes arguments less persuasive It is natural to think of opposing information when you disagree with an author s claim. When you try to persuade people without taking into account their possible objections, you will generally not be as effective as when you do address the objections. Therefore it is best not to ignore counter information but to instead: * raise them AND * try to weaken them. Which counter-claims you address depends on your expected audience (e.g., state legislature, other students).

5 Audience can affect what is required in an argument A minimal argument is a claim supported by at least one reason. This may be adequate when you expect your audience to be favorable toward your position. Most of the time, however, arguments are written for a mixed audience, including some that may be openly hostile to your claim. Intelligent people frequently disagree over positions that may seem self-evident or unassailable. It is important to understand the views of a prospective audience and carefully consider exactly what the points of contention are and then rebut expected objections with reasons that would be acceptable to your audience.

6 Audience can affect what is required in an argument Studies have shown that people find arguments that acknowledge but rebut the other side to be more persuasive than either one-sided arguments or arguments that mention the other side without rebutting it. Therefore, a quality argument has a claim, multiple reasons, at least one counter-claim, and a rebuttal. Argument = main claim + pro-reasons + counter-claim + rebuttal

7 Example of a more complete argument Incomplete Argument = main claim + pro-reasons The comprehensive exam example only has two components: main claim: NIU should require all students to pass a comprehensive exam in order to graduate pro-reasons: they have been shown to be effective in improving achievement they have been shown to be effective in improving marketability. Good only if preaching to the converted!

8 Example of a more complete argument More complete Argument = main claim + pro-reasons + counter-claim + rebuttal If the argument is intended for a mixed or hostile audience (such as current students at NIU), a more complete argument would also include: counter: Although, many students might find such exams stressful rebuttal: the benefits of an easier job search, especially one resulting in a better paying job, will reduce more future stress.

9 Professor expectations Our research has found that most college students don t include counters because they think it weakens their argument. Professors, however, assume that students know that effective arguments contain all 4 components. Although they usually do not directly instruct students to include a counterclaim and rebuttal, they will judge the argument as ineffective and incomplete. So assume: Argument = main claim + pro-reasons + counter-claim + rebuttal

10 Impression management In addition to increasing the persuasiveness of your argument, presenting counter-information creates a better impression of you, the author. By acknowledging opponents arguments, you present yourself as: Credible Fair, open-minded, and unthreatened by others positions. Many people consider a one-sided argument to be fallacious. This fallacy is called stacking the deck when you present evidence that supports only your side of the issue. Objective and reasonable in presenting an informed perspective Knowledgeable of a wide range of facts, beliefs and evidence

11 Begin with planning To write a convincing argument, one has to begin with a little planning. Lack of planning is the biggest reason for ineffective arguments. When planning, try to do the following: 1. Identify target audiences. 2. Select strongest pro-reasons for audiences. 3. List potential counter-arguments. 4. Select counter-argument(s) to include. 5. Respond to counter-argument(s). All of this may take only a few minutes but it will make your argument much stronger.

12 Identify target audiences You want to consider who you are attempting to persuade or at least who you will be addressing. What objections might they have to your position? 1. First, try to be as concrete as possible in visualizing these audiences. * Who is a prototypical member? * Brainstorm through different characteristics, such as their vocation, age, gender, culture, leisure activities, religious beliefs, educational background, income level. * Each different group you can identify can be viewed as an audience that you will be trying to persuade.

13 Identify target audiences 2. Second, consider your target audiences beliefs. Think about their opinions, attitudes and perspectives to try to figure out what their objections might be. 3. Finally, consider your target audiences knowledge. How much do you have to tell them and how can you connect.

14 Consider target audiences knowledge Most audiences are likely to have a range of knowledge about any given topic (e.g., very little more than you). As a writer, your task is to both inform and persuade, so you will need to provide an appropriate amount of information as background for your argument and to explain your reasons. Gauging the appropriate level can be difficult. You don t want to bore knowledgeable members and you don t want to completely lose the unknowledgeable ones.

15 For a class paper: Consider target audiences knowledge you can generally assume that your audience is intelligent but somewhat uninformed. part of your job is to show that you can explain and elaborate on information you have learned in the class. students often incorrectly assume an intelligent AND informed audience. For a general audience: you want to direct your presentation to a moderately informed member. Provide information in a manner that reminds them of pertinent facts but does not lecture them.

16 Consider target audiences beliefs It is critical to determine the general disposition of your audience to your claim. If this is unknown, you should consider your audience a mixture of people who are friendly, hostile, and ambivalent toward your claim. Friendly Members Hostile or unfriendly Members Ambivalent Members Uninformed/Undecided Members

17 Consider target audiences beliefs Friendly Members have already thought about the issue and agree with your position. generally, no need to persuade, just shore up belief. for them, it is sufficient to present familiar pro-reasons but select those that won t alienate other members

18 Consider target audiences beliefs Hostile or unfriendly Members have thought about the issue and disagree, perhaps strongly, with your position maybe best you can hope for is to get them to appreciate your side you need to address their objections and provide rebuttals show you understand their perspective and beliefs show you are knowledgeable and fair

19 Consider target audiences beliefs Ambivalent Members have thought about the issue, may have a pro or con leaning, but can see both sides and are not strongly committed to a particular position great to target because they are more persuadable than the first two groups you want them to see you dealing with opposition objections but pitch your rebuttal arguments to them and use reasons that would be acceptable to them.

20 Consider target audiences beliefs Uninformed/Undecided Members may or may not have thought about or care about the issue if they make up a sizeable portion of your audience, you want to both inform and interest them in the issue you have an opportunity to create their first impression of your side make it a positive, memorable one

21 PRACTICE: Claim: NIU should institute a comprehensive exam policy. Say: Friendly, hostile, ambivalent, undecided/unknowledgable audience And Why? 1. Current and prospective students. 2. People who have not attended college. 3. Employers who want well-educated workers. 4. Honors students who want to be highly competitive in the job market. 5. Professors who to help motivate students to learn.

22 1. Current and prospective students. Hostile: Students probably won t want to take the exam. 2. People who have not attended college. Undecided: People unfamiliar with college likely won t have a firm opinion. 3. Employers who want well-educated workers. Friendly: Employers might believe the exam will improve the quality of prospective workers. 4. Honors students who want to be highly competitive in the job market. Ambivalent: On the one hand, honors students probably believe they can do well on the exam and that it may increase the value of their degree. On the other hand, they probably don t want the added external pressure. 5. Professors who to help motivate students to learn. Friendly: Professors may think an exam will help motive students to take school more seriously and study harder to retain what they have taught.

23 Select strongest pro-reasons for target audience Strong reasons for audience. Reasons are not absolutely strong or weak. The strength of a reason depends on who you are trying to convince. What are your strongest reasons or evidence to persuade each audience? They may not necessarily be all the ones you, personally, think are best. Try to think from your audience s perspective and select those that will be most persuasive to your audience.

24 Select strongest pro-reasons for target audience Eliminate weak reasons for audience. Leave out reasons or evidence that may be viewed as irrelevant, untrue, or unimportant to this audience. Also, try to select reasons that will not alienate other members of the audience. This is challenging when the audience is mixed.

25 Select strongest pro-reasons for target audience Engaging introduction. Try to find any common ground or points that you and the audience agree upon. Often it is best to start with this to engage your audience and break through any resistant attitudes they may have adopted before even reading your argument.

26 List potential counter-arguments for target audience Begin by thinking about each of these audiences and try to list as many reasons why each group may disagree with you as you can think of in a few minutes. Try to identify any strong opinions or beliefs they have about your claim or topic. Brainstorm only at this point! Don t begin evaluating until you have listed all the reasons you can. If you have trouble thinking, try to write down your own assumptions. Are any of your assumptions questionable to this audience? These will be potential counter-arguments that you should address.

27 Select counter for target audience You obviously can t address every objection. The main thing is to identify the one or two most important counterarguments and address them.

28 Select counter for target audience Select counter-arguments based on: 1. Necessity. If there is a counter-argument that very readily comes to your mind, then it will also come to the minds of your audience members. If you address it, your audience will likely be more receptive of the rest of your message. 2. Prospects for success. Other things being equal, select counter-arguments for which you have the best rebuttal arguments. If you can, avoid presenting weak arguments or ones whose reason wouldn t be acceptable to your audience. Such arguments work against you by making you look unreasonable and inconsiderate of your audience

29 Response to counter-arguments Approach to counter-arguments. There are many ways to deal with a counter-argument. You have to decide whether you want to concede, dismiss or rebut the counter-claim or qualify one of your own claims or reasons in response to it. 1. Concessions A concession is where you accept a counterargument. 2. Dismiss A dismissal is where you assert that counterargument is simply false or irrelevant. 3. Rebuttal A rebuttal is an argument against a counter-claim. 4. Add a qualifier In the face of a strong counter-argument, one might avoid an outright concession by qualifying one s own claim. This means limiting the scope or degree of certainty that you have asserted.

30 Response: Concession Concession is where you recognize or accept part of the opposing view but contest another part. You essentially say that some fact or belief is true. For example, It is true that many students might find it stressful to take a comprehensive exam. Notice that in a concession you acknowledge that there is some merit to the audiences worries or beliefs. Often people also make it clear that the concession doesn t weaken their main claim by stating that it is not as important as something else. For example, Although many students might find it stressful to take a comprehensive exam, that doesn t mean that it would not be worthwhile. Conceding a point can be an effective part of your presentation if the claim you accept is not central to your own position and your own rebuttal reason would be weak. So concede things that you actually think is true or that has strong support for. Do not concede things that are not so important that it will weaken your argument.

31 Special audience considerations: Response: Concession Conceding things you agree on makes you appear fair and creates common ground, especially to ambivalent and uninformed audiences. Care must be taken to not give the impression that your position has been compromised, especially to an uninformed audience who may not be able to properly assess the effect of the concession on your overall position. So it may be wise to briefly mention or explain how the point you concede it is not critical. For example, Although many students might find it stressful to take a comprehensive exam, stress is not always a bad thing. A moderate amount of stress may motivate them to learn the material at a level that they would otherwise not have reached. In fact, this actually bolsters the argument that comprehensive exams may produce better learning results.

32 Response: Dismiss Dismiss this is where you say the counter is not true or totally irrelevant. For example, Some say such exams are invalid measures of what people learn, but that is not true. Dismiss things that you think are wrong or not important to the argument. Do not dismiss things that you think your audience hold dear. Those will require a rebuttal. Special audience considerations: Dismissals should be done sparingly because they can offend audiences, especially hostile audiences, and make you appear unfair or inconsiderate. Unless you believe that an ambivalent or uninformed audience would see your assertion as self-evident, you should provide a backing argument for the dismissal thus making it a rebuttal and not simply a dismissal.

33 Response: Rebut Rebuttal this is where you argue against the opposing view by presenting reasons or evidence to show that it is weak, illogical, irrelevant, or factually wrong. For example, Some argue that comprehensive exams do more harm than good. However, several studies have shown that universities and colleges that use starting giving such exams got a reversal in the decline scores on standardized achievement test. Do this when you are mentioning a counter that, if conceded, would really weaken your argument. Do select rebuttals that you think will be acceptable to your audience. Just like reasons, rebuttals are not universally strong. Their power depends on the audience s beliefs and knowledge. Special audience considerations: The rebut, if done well, can reinforce a friendly audience s belief in the claim you are arguing for. A strong rebuttal can undercut other side arguments especially for ambivalent, uninformed and undecided members.

34 Response: Qualify or limit statements Sometimes the best thing to do is to not mention a counter but to actually limit your statement so the objection is no longer relevant. If you notice that one could easily object to your claims or assertion, you may come to clarify your own position better. If so, just add a qualifier to make your statements more true. For example, if you want to say: Students will undoubtedly learn more in college if they have to take a comprehensive exam. Someone may counter that by saying: Honors students already learn the most they can learn. Many students could not study any more given all their other responsibilities. By noticing this counter you may decide to change your statement slightly: Many students will learn more in college if they have to take a comprehensive exam.

35 Response: Qualify or limit statements Do qualify your claim appropriately so you can head off simple counterarguments. Special audience considerations: Appropriate qualification may create a positive impression on some audience members, but care must be taken to avoid giving the impression of a major concession. Some people interpret any qualifiers as indicating that the writer is unknowledgeable or uncertain. Others recognize them as necessary restrictions and may look suspiciously on certain kinds of statements that lack them. You must decide how your audience perceives qualifiers before using this response.

36 Writing to a hostile audience Potential problems. Finally, we should make a couple points about to think about when you are writing to a hostile or non-friendly audience. These suggestions we have come up with based on typical problems students have when dealing with hostile audiences. 1. Common ground. Students often focus on the differences in views. It is helpful to show that you understand others perspective and point out the things that you actually agree with. 2. Tone. One of the biggest problems students have in dealing with people they disagree with is the tone of the message. You don t want to talk down, insult, appear angry, attack or be sarcastic. It is important to treat your audience like they are intelligent and with respect. Attacking the person or treating their opinions as ignorant will make your audience more entrenched in their position. One tricky part of tone is to be careful to not use asides to get little digs in to attack or insult your audience. 3. Poor arguments. Often when students have not really worked to understand the audience s perspective, they try to just put in a weak counter to seem like they are trying to be fair or consider the audience. Also do not select a ridiculous or straw man version of their position. Doing so will make you appear unfair and rebutting it will not help persuade the audience. In fact, talk radio uses these poor versions of other counters to make their believers more convinced, not to actually address opposing audiences.

37 Global organization of the argument 1. Try to begin your argument by build a connection with audience and getting them to see the importance of the topic. This is where common ground comes in. 2. Make sure to provide enough information or background context so your audience will understand your position. This is where you need to consider your audiences knowledge or beliefs. But you definitely don t want to include background or details that are unnecessary. It is insulting and boring. 3. State your position clearly and present strong reasons that will be acceptable to your target audience. 4. Acknowledge the most obvious objection and rebut it if possible. Neutralizing objection will help the reader put that out of their mind for a while so they can attend to the rest of your argument. 5. Where you put your counter depends on your counter and your audience. If you have a mostly hostile audience, you could start with a thoughtful presentation of the opposition s perspective and slowly, over the course of the argument, show how your position is more appropriate given the evidence. This is called a Rogerian argument. If your audience is more mixed, you may want to put the counter and rebuttal where ever it would naturally come to the reader s mind. 6. End strong.

38 Exercise for identifying audience? 1. What kind of audience is the author addressing? 2. How did the author construct the text to work for that audience? i.e. Did he/she play to the prejudices of the audience? Did he/she sound antagonistic anywhere? Did he/she seek common ground? 3. Does any of the evidence seem slanted or biased? 4. Given an audience, which reasons would be persuasive? which may be an obvious objection?

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job Argument Writing Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job promotion as well as political and personal decision-making

More information

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Overview: Application: What to Avoid: UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,

More information

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence. Body Paragraphs Notes W1: Argumentative Writing a. Claim Statement Introduce precise claim Paragraph Structure organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons,

More information

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis

More information

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques

More information

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation VI. RULES OF PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE A. General 1. Public Forum Debate is a form of two-on-two debate which ask debaters to discuss a current events issue. 2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development

More information

Argumentative Writing

Argumentative Writing Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that

More information

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery; IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary

More information

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates All debaters must be financial members of the NZYF Club for which they are debating at the time of each debate. 1. Each team shall consist of three speakers. 2. Responsibilities

More information

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always

More information

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Like this study set? Create a free account to save it. Create a free account Accident Adapting Ad hominem attack (Attack on the person) Advantage Affirmative

More information

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE A. General 1. All debates must be based on the current National High School Debate resolution chosen under the auspices of the National Topic Selection Committee of the

More information

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2 AICE Thinking kills Review How to Master Paper 2 Important Things to Remember You are given 1 hour and 45 minutes for Paper 2 You should spend approximately 30 minutes on each question Write neatly! Read

More information

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams The Judge's Weighing Mechanism Very simply put, a framework in academic debate is the set of standards the judge will use to evaluate

More information

Modern Approaches to Argument

Modern Approaches to Argument Chapter 2 Modern Approaches to Argument In Chapter 1, you examined ancient rhetorical tools and applied them to a modern text. In this chapter, you will encounter a variety of modern approaches to argument.

More information

Well-Being, Disability, and the Mere-Difference Thesis. Jennifer Hawkins Duke University

Well-Being, Disability, and the Mere-Difference Thesis. Jennifer Hawkins Duke University This paper is in the very early stages of development. Large chunks are still simply detailed outlines. I can, of course, fill these in verbally during the session, but I apologize in advance for its current

More information

The Art of Debate. What is Debate? Debate is a discussion involving opposing viewpoints Formal debate

The Art of Debate. What is Debate? Debate is a discussion involving opposing viewpoints Formal debate The Art of Debate Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi Department of Electrical Engineering University of Washington http://smartenergylab.com What is Debate? Debate is a discussion involving opposing viewpoints Formal

More information

I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS a I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS In persuasive or argumentative writing, we try to convince others to agree with our facts, share our values, accept our argument and conclusions, and adopt our

More information

Cross X Debate. Strategy

Cross X Debate. Strategy Cross X Debate Strategy Cross Examination Strategy Judges are normally able to tell only four things about a debate: they can tell who was the most at ease; they can tell who had the most concrete information;

More information

Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost?

Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost? CHY4U Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost? ISSUE SUMMARY YES: Peter Kroptkin (1842-1921), a Russian prince, revolutionary, and anarchist, argues that the French Revolution eradicated both serfdom

More information

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim

More information

The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it!

The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it! MPS Chap. 16 The Strategy of Persuasion The focus of persuasion is not on the source, the message, or the receiver, but on all of them equally. They all cooperate to make a persuasive process. The idea

More information

BCC Papers 5/2, May

BCC Papers 5/2, May BCC Papers 5/2, May 2010 http://bycommonconsent.com/2010/05/25/bcc-papers-5-2-smithsuspensive-historiography/ Is Suspensive Historiography the Only Legitimate Kind? Christopher C. Smith I am a PhD student

More information

What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays?

What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays? What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays? Defining Persuasive Writing Persuasive Writing: Writing that has as its purpose convincing others to accept the writer s position

More information

Debate and Debate Adjudication

Debate and Debate Adjudication Debate and Debate Adjudication Rachmat Nurcahyo,M.A. Yogyakarta State University National Polythecnic English Debate Competition 2012, Tual Maluku Tenggara Overview What is Competitive Debate Understanding

More information

The Toulmin Model in Brief

The Toulmin Model in Brief The Toulmin Model in Brief A popular form of argument is the Toulmin model (other forms include classical and Rogerian). This model is named after Stephen Toulmin, who in The Uses of Argument proposed

More information

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because. Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

More information

Your Church Participation

Your Church Participation Your Church Participation * 1. How long have you been a member of Windham Presbyterian Church? (how long you have attended, as a member or friend, is next) Not a member 2-4 years 10-19 years One year or

More information

Drafting an Argument. Main Page. Rogerian Method. Page 1 of 11

Drafting an Argument. Main Page. Rogerian Method.   Page 1 of 11 Writing@CSU Writing Guide Drafting an Argument This Writing Guide was downloaded from the Writing@CSU Web Site at Colorado State University on October 13, 2018 at 3:08 AM. You can view the guide at https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=56.

More information

INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY

INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE WRITING ADAPTED PARTIALLY FROM DR. TAMARA FUDGE, KAPLAN UNIVERSITY HOW DO I TELL IF AN AUTHOR IS ARGUING DEDUCTIVELY OR INDUCTIVELY? In both case, a question or problem must be

More information

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

More information

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING SEVENTH EDITION JOHN D. RAMAGE, JOHN C. BEAN, AND JUNE JOHNSON PART 2: WRITING PROJECTS CHAPTER 13 WRITING A CLASSICAL ARGUMENT Chapter 13 Learning Objectives In this

More information

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES AN ORAL DEPOSITION IS SWORN TESTIMONY TAKEN AND RECORDED BEFORE TRIAL. The purpose is to discover facts, obtain leads to other evidence, preserve testimony of an witness who

More information

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion

More information

Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View

Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical

More information

E X A M I N A T I O N S C O U N C I L REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2004 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

E X A M I N A T I O N S C O U N C I L REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2004 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION C A R I B B E A N E X A M I N A T I O N S C O U N C I L REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2004 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Copyright 2004 Caribbean Examinations

More information

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others Argument or quarrel? Many people would ask, What s the difference? To them, the two terms convey the same meaning, both calling to mind two angry people, shouting,

More information

Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim)

Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim) Writing a Strong Thesis Statement (Claim) Marcinkus - AP Language and Composition Whenever you are asked to make an argument, you must begin with your thesis, or the claim that you are going to try to

More information

Humanizing the Future

Humanizing the Future Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Student Publications 2014 Humanizing the Future Jessica Evanoff Cedarville University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/student_publications

More information

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating

More information

Final Paper. May 13, 2015

Final Paper. May 13, 2015 24.221 Final Paper May 13, 2015 Determinism states the following: given the state of the universe at time t 0, denoted S 0, and the conjunction of the laws of nature, L, the state of the universe S at

More information

The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984)

The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984) The Non-Identity Problem from Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit (1984) Each of us might never have existed. What would have made this true? The answer produces a problem that most of us overlook. One

More information

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS The Extended Investigation Critical Thinking Test assesses the ability of students to produce arguments, and to analyse and assess

More information

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims. Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem

More information

CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM

CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM There are a variety of competitive speech and debate programs in which young people may participate. While the programs may have some similarities,

More information

PRESENTS. 5/30/2013 Bates Staff Retreat 1

PRESENTS. 5/30/2013 Bates Staff Retreat 1 PRESENTS 1 Bates Leadership Team ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES Presented by Lisa Lee Williams, MaOM, Mdiv. Why Are We Here? To Celebrate Success To Consider Opportunities To Creatively Move Forward! 4 5 6 8 9 Your

More information

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? . What is the purpose of argumentation? Argumentation 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? According to Toulmin (964), the checking list can be outlined as follows: () The Claim

More information

DO YOU WANT TO WRITE:

DO YOU WANT TO WRITE: DO YOU WANT TO WRITE: -CONFIDENTLY? -CLEARLY? -FLUENTLY? -LOGICALLY? -RELEVANTLY? -DISTINCTIVELY? --PERSUASIVELY? YES? EXCELLENT. LET S GET STARTED! HOW TO WRITE PERSUASIVELY Dear Students, Practice makes

More information

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws. Fallacies 1. Hasty generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or too small). Stereotypes about

More information

Refutation Paragraphs

Refutation Paragraphs Refutation Paragraphs The refutation paragraph is normally found ONLY in argument essays and argument research papers; it is also known as the concession paragraph. When students are writing an argumentative

More information

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean?? Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda So many terms...what do they all mean?? Learning Targets Argumentative Reading Unit LT 1: I can cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports what the text

More information

HOLINESS. (Background and Summary) (Given by a Layperson)

HOLINESS. (Background and Summary) (Given by a Layperson) HOLINESS (Background and Summary) (Given by a Layperson) Background: The heart of the CEW is an exposition of what it is to be a Christian. The weekend stresses the three necessary elements of the Christian

More information

Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor

Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor The Persuasive Essay Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor What to expect You have finished your first complete essay! Now that you understand the basic essay structure, you re going to try writing a couple

More information

A FORMAL MODEL OF LEGAL PROOF STANDARDS AND BURDENS

A FORMAL MODEL OF LEGAL PROOF STANDARDS AND BURDENS 1 A FORMAL MODEL OF LEGAL PROOF STANDARDS AND BURDENS Thomas F. Gordon, Fraunhofer Fokus Douglas Walton, University of Windsor This paper presents a formal model that enables us to define five distinct

More information

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS Page1 Lesson 4-2 FACTORS THAT REDUCE INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS Page2 Ask Yourself: FACTORS THAT REDUCE INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS * What is it that gets in the way of me getting what I want and need?

More information

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

More information

This document consists of 10 printed pages.

This document consists of 10 printed pages. Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level THINKING SKILLS 9694/43 Paper 4 Applied Reasoning MARK SCHEME imum Mark: 50 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid

More information

Rubric for DBQ Essay. A. Thesis

Rubric for DBQ Essay. A. Thesis Rubric for DBQ Essay A. Thesis 2 Points B. Document Analysis 2 points Targeted Skill: Argumentation Presents a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and responds to all parts of the question.

More information

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance).

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance). Brainstorm for Persuasive Essay with counterargument TOPIC OR PROBLEM: What do you want the reader to believe? Start here: COUNTERARGUMENT: Why might someone disagree with you? SOLUTION OR COMPROMISE:

More information

10. Evaluation Evaluating individual reasons and objections

10. Evaluation Evaluating individual reasons and objections 10. Evaluation The ability to evaluate arguments is probably the most important part of critical thinking. We have already looked at various aspects of the evaluation of arguments. But it will be useful

More information

Understanding Thesis and Support

Understanding Thesis and Support Invention 43 During test Found test hard Saw Jeff cheating After test Got angry Wanted to tell Dismissed idea In college Understand implications of cheating Understand goals of education Exercise 7 Continue

More information

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument

More information

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106 Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models English 106 The Toulmin Model Developed by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in the 1950 s Emphasizes that logic often based on probability

More information

4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS

4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS Argumentative Performance Task Focus Standards Grade 8: W.8.5; L.8.1; L.8.2 4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS ORGANIZATION

More information

Church Member Survey number Total Respondents

Church Member Survey number Total Respondents Church Member Survey number Total Respondents TASKS OF THE CHURCH The survey listed a number of tasks that a local church is likely to perform. Congregational members were asked to evaluate these tasks

More information

The Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay The Argumentative Essay but what is the difference between an argument and a quarrel? Academic argumentation is based on logical, structured evidence that attempts the reader to accept an opinion, take

More information

Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and

Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and 1 Internalism and externalism about justification Theories of epistemic justification can be divided into two groups: internalist and externalist. Internalist theories of justification say that whatever

More information

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each. Logical Fallacies An argument is a chain of reasons that a person uses to support a claim or a conclusion. To use argument well, you need to know 1) how to draw logical conclusions from sound evidence

More information

GCE Religious Studies Unit A (RSS01) Religion and Ethics 1 June 2009 Examination Candidate Exemplar Work: Candidate B

GCE Religious Studies Unit A (RSS01) Religion and Ethics 1 June 2009 Examination Candidate Exemplar Work: Candidate B hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Unit A (RSS01) Religion and Ethics 1 June 2009 Examination Candidate Exemplar Work: Candidate B Copyright 2009 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved.

More information

JUDGING Policy Debate

JUDGING Policy Debate JUDGING Policy Debate Table of Contents Overview... 2 Round Structure... 3 Parts of an Argument... 4 How to Determine the Winner... 5 What to Do After the Round... 6 Sample Ballot... 7 Sample Flow Sheet...

More information

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005)

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) General There are two alternative strategies which can be employed when answering questions in a multiple-choice test. Some

More information

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker. Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.

More information

Counterarguments. This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument.

Counterarguments. This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument. Counterarguments This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument. 3. Give examples of counterarguments 4. We will complete the activities in class to practice

More information

Teaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018

Teaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018 Teaching Argument Blanqui Valledor SURN April 20, 2018 Introducing Argument Amy s Murder Discussion Who Dunnit? Persuasion versus Argument Subtle, but Significant differences between.. The Goals: Persuasive

More information

DEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false.

DEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false. DEBATING - First Speaker Guide Topic Position Team-line Affirmative/Negative Greeting and Introduction Good chairperson, opposition and audience. The topic for today's debate is that We, the team, believe

More information

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS 1 PATTERNS FOR SAYING WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING Part I: Ways to introduce standard views These offer a way to bring up a topic about a view so widely accepted that is it basically

More information

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand), Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise

More information

I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook.

I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook. Hello once again! Essay Assignment 1 I would like to give you some suggestions now that should help you as you are working on Essay Assignment 1. This presentation is somewhat long, but the information

More information

IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY. Jennifer Saul

IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY. Jennifer Saul IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY Jennifer Saul Implicit Biases: those that we will be concerned with here are unconscious biases that affect the way we perceive, evaluate, or interact

More information

Step 1 Pick an unwanted emotion. Step 2 Identify the thoughts behind your unwanted emotion

Step 1 Pick an unwanted emotion. Step 2 Identify the thoughts behind your unwanted emotion Step 1 Pick an unwanted emotion Pick an emotion you don t want to have anymore. You should pick an emotion that is specific to a certain time, situation, or circumstance. You may want to lose your anger

More information

Survey of Pastors. Source of Data in This Report

Survey of Pastors. Source of Data in This Report Survey of Pastors Mega Study 1 North American Division of the Seventh day Adventist Church Source of Data in This Report A random sample of 500 local churches in the North American Division of the Seventh

More information

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does

More information

Council on American-Islamic Relations RESEARCH CENTER AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS

Council on American-Islamic Relations RESEARCH CENTER AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS CAIR Council on American-Islamic Relations RESEARCH CENTER AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS 2006 453 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003-2604 Tel: 202-488-8787 Fax: 202-488-0833 Web:

More information

Best Practices For Motions Brief Writing: Part 2

Best Practices For Motions Brief Writing: Part 2 Best Practices For Motions Brief Writing: Part 2 Law360, New York (March 7, 2016, 3:08 PM ET) Scott M. Himes This two part series is a primer for effective brief writing when making a motion. It suggests

More information

Interpersonal Communication and Conflict Management

Interpersonal Communication and Conflict Management Interpersonal Communication and Conflict Management ML502 LESSON 24 of 24 Kenneth O. Gangel, Ph.D. Experience: Former Professor of Christian Education at Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas, TX. This

More information

The Jesuit Character of Seattle University: Some Suggestions as a Contribution to Strategic Planning

The Jesuit Character of Seattle University: Some Suggestions as a Contribution to Strategic Planning The Jesuit Character of Seattle University: Some Suggestions as a Contribution to Strategic Planning Stephen V. Sundborg. S. J. November 15, 2018 As we enter into strategic planning as a university, I

More information

Psyc 402 Online Survey Question Key 11/11/2018 Page 1

Psyc 402 Online Survey Question Key 11/11/2018 Page 1 Psyc 402 Online Survey Question Key 11/11/2018 Page 1 Question # Q211 Author: 100140704 I have offered my seat on a bus or train to a stranger who was standing. 1 never 2 once 3 more than once 4 often

More information

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only

More information

Basic Debating Skills

Basic Debating Skills Basic Debating Skills A Debate A debate is, basically, an argument. That is not to say that it is an undisciplined shouting match between parties that passionately believe in a particular point of view.

More information

Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1

Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1 Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1 Critique of Walter Lippmann s Indispensable Opposition Melia Young October 31, 2013 Heidi Barker CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE

More information

Solving the Puzzle of Affirmative Action Jene Mappelerien

Solving the Puzzle of Affirmative Action Jene Mappelerien Solving the Puzzle of Affirmative Action Jene Mappelerien Imagine that you are working on a puzzle, and another person is working on their own duplicate puzzle. Whoever finishes first stands to gain a

More information

Class Meeting 3 Chapter 3 Learning the Role of the Musician

Class Meeting 3 Chapter 3 Learning the Role of the Musician Conversational Evangelism - 1 - Chapter 3 Learning the Role of the Musician Redefining What We Mean by Evangelism (Expanded Definition of Evangelism) Every day and in every way helping our pre-believing

More information

Basic Church Profile Inventory Sample

Basic Church Profile Inventory Sample Introduction Basic Church Profile Inventory Sample This is a sample of all the questions contained in Hartford Institute's Church Profile Inventory Survey that can be completed online. A church that chooses

More information

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) 1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

More information

Argumentation Paper Honors/AP Language and Composition English 11

Argumentation Paper Honors/AP Language and Composition English 11 Argumentation Paper Honors/AP Language and Composition English 11 What does an argument essay look like? Read and answer the questions in The Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, chapter for Argument.

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 th May 2016 / 1 st September 2016 On 06 th October 2016.

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 th May 2016 / 1 st September 2016 On 06 th October 2016. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 th May 2016 / 1 st September 2016 On 06 th October 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Testing Fairmindedness

Testing Fairmindedness INFORMAL LOGIC XIII. 1, Winter 1991 Testing Fairmindedness ALEC FISHER University of East Anglia 1. Introduction Richard Paul is well-known for his advocacy of "strong" critical thinking, that complex

More information

Effective Academic Writing: The Argument

Effective Academic Writing: The Argument THE WRITING CENTER Academic Services Phone: 962-7710 www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/ Effective Academic Writing: The Argument What this handout is about... This handout will define what an argument is and why

More information

Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments

Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments Objectives By the end of today s lesson you will be able to: Make a counter-argument to a view that has been expressed, addressing weaknesses in the argument

More information

Student Engagement and Controversial Issues in Schools

Student Engagement and Controversial Issues in Schools 76 Dianne Gereluk University of Calgary Schools are not immune to being drawn into politically and morally contested debates in society. Indeed, one could say that schools are common sites of some of the

More information