Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job"

Transcription

1 Argument Writing Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job promotion as well as political and personal decision-making * High-school students, however, are not proficient argument processors, evaluators, or producers. * Only 13% of 12 th graders were judged skillful or excellent in a persuasive writing assessment * Only 12% of 12 th graders were at or above the proficient level in producing written arguments Argument Writing in College * Writing clear arguments is a skill that all college students have to develop both for continued success in the academic world as well as for future success in the career world. * Three skills that you should focus on developing: * Presenting a precise claim * Providing elaborated and supportive reasons * Presenting and dismissing common counterarguments Some Problems * Personalizers (two types) personal pronouns on claims and reasons, personal descriptions as evidence * Non-committers claim asserts and reasons support two sides * Listers Unelaborated reasons * Unwarranted reasons reason doesn t support the claim * Alternative claims providing an alternative solution as a reason * Circular reasoning reason is reworded claim * Journalers explore topic without a clear claim and reasons Common problems * Lack of claim precision Only 50% made clear claim on the controversy; many argued for a sub-claim leaving claim for reader to infer * Lack of backing Less than 1 elaboration per reason * My-side bias Only 48% of Unrestricted essays mentioned other side

2 The Elements of an Argument Cell phone use while driving should be permitted. Although this act may be considered dangerous, it actually can potentially save lives because people can immediately report crimes or accidents. Claim Cell phone use while driving should be permitted Reason Cell phones saves lives Backing People can immediately report crimes or accidents. Counter (other side) It is dangerous Warrant: The underlying assumption that connects your data to Backing: Additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to your claim. support the warrant. Presenting a precise claim * A claim is a disputable statement that an author is trying to persuade the reader to accept. The claim is extremely important because it sets the tone and legitimacy of your argument where your readers will make their initial judgments about your particular issue. * If it is faulty in some way, you ve already lost them and your opportunity to change their minds. Precision is more important in arguments than any other form of writing. When you write your main claim, use clear and exact terms to convey to your reader what topic you ll be exploring as well as the stance you will take. In arguing with friends, we often do not concern ourselves with precision, but when writing arguments it critically important. Each of the following claims are on the same theme (speeding) but have very different stances (is harmful, is immoral, should be illegal, should not be done). * A. Speeding is harmful. (come up with reasons to prove) * B. Speeding is immoral. * C. Speeding should be illegal. * D. Speeding should not be done. Type of claims * There are several types of claims you can make. If you want to get people to agree to change their behavior directly, then you may want to use a policy claim predicate (i.e., verb) such as these two claims: Speeding laws should be strictly enforced. Speeding should be prohibited. * If you want to get people to agree to change their beliefs only, then you may want to use a value claim such as these three claims: Speeding is harmful. Speeding is immoral. * One special type of belief that you can argue is a causal or factual claim is true such as these two claims:

3 Speeding affects our fuel economy. Speeding is driving faster than 55 mph on our local highways. * When writing the main claim of your argument, be very careful in selecting the predicate ("should be enforced", "is harmful", "affects"). It should state what you really want to convince the reader to believe or do. A simple and direct claim is best if you want to be clearly understood. Claim predicate determines reasons * When writing your argument, the type of predicate you select for your claim will affect what evidence can support it. If the claim is that "Speeding laws should be strictly enforced", then you could present evidence that speeding is not currently being enforced or that speeding is so harmful that we need to catch more speeders. * If you are claiming that "Speeding is harmful", then you could present evidence that people have been injured or killed from speeding. * If your claim predicate asserts a causal relationship such as "Speeding affects our fuel economy", then you could present evidence that when a driver drives faster, they get poorer gas mileage. * When writing your claim, pick your words carefully and make sure not to switch what you are arguing throughout your essay. It is easy to drift to a new claim predicate when writing arguments. Policy claims * These types of claims have two parts. These type of arguments must establish that a problem exists and propose a policy that solves the problem. * When reading arguments, first, does the author you are reading convincingly establish that a problem exists? What evidence does he/she provide to support that? Make sure you completely understand this part before offering a solution. If no problem exists, then there is no reason to present a solution. * Second, once you have shown there is or is not a problem, next consider whether the proposed solution is a good one. A good solution should be fair, effective, not overly restrictive, and something that can be regulated by the government. For example, the government cannot regulate the number of pennies that each customer should carry at a given time, or can they? Claim checklist Take a stance on the controversy explicitly Does your claim take a side on this controversy? Don t leave it up to your reader to guess your position from another related claim like cell phones are dangerous because it is possible to argue that cell phones are dangerous but still not conclude that we should or should not ban them. If your main claim is not either there should or should not be a ban on using cell phones while driving, then you should change it.

4 Claim location Because your entire argument is organized around the claim, many author s begin their argument with an presentation of their claim early in the essay. To make sure the reader really got the message and remember it, author s also often end their essay with a restatement of the claim. Although there are other ways to organize an argument, this is a simple and common way to write an argument. Do NOT mark the claim personally When you write an argument, it is obvious that it is your opinion or belief. It weakens your claim when you include phrases like "I believe," or I think," or "Personally." Use the correct form Claims should not be commands (e.g. "Ban cell phones") or questions (e.g. "Should there be a ban on using cell phones while driving?"). Providing Elaborated and Supportive Reasons * An argument is an attempt to persuade readers to change their attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors by providing one or more reasons to support the claim. * One of the most common mistakes is to merely list reasons; however, when writing a strong argument, select the most important 3 or 4 reasons and focus on these. Write at least a single paragraph for each reason and in that paragraph explain, elaborate, give examples, and provide evidence, if possible, that supports the stance of the claim that you ve made. * If your reader doesn t really understand your reason and the implications of that reason, then they will not be convinced by it. Finally, make sure that the reasons you are providing support the exact claim that you have made, and that you haven t accidentally switched claims simply because you ve thought of a good reason. * Each reason must provide strong support for why someone should agree with your claim. If your claim is that we should ban cell phones, then each reason should indicate why this claim is true. Presenting Reasons 1. Present strong, convincing reasons 2. Avoid non-reasons 3. Elaborate on each reason

5 Present strong, convincing reasons * Focus on strong reasons When considering your reasons, you want to select the most important 3 or 4 reasons and focus on these. If these reasons are strong, 3 or 4 will generally be enough to create a serious argument. * Avoid support based on testimonials or personal experience Students arguments often rely too heavily on using their own experience to support their claims. However, using personal experiences as support is weak because they are based on only one person s experience or a small handful of people. Base your reasons on more general principles, such as Schools that use comprehensive exams may be pressured to lowering their standard to pass enough students. Generalizable statements are stronger than personal anecdotes. * Order reasons for impact How should you order your reasons? Research has found that people often recall first and last items the best, so it is good to present your strongest reasons first and last with your weaker reasons in the middle. Avoid non-reasons When thinking of your reasons, make sure they each make the claim more believable. Here are 3 types of "non-reasons" to avoid. Unwarranted reasons An unwarranted reason is one that is not relevant to the specific claim predicate. For example, "NIU should not have comprehensive exams because the exam would be boring". Being boring doesn t make something harmful. It is not a good reason for the university to decide not to do something. To check if a reason is warranted you have to pay special attention to the type of claim you are making "is harmful", "is immoral", "should be prohibited". Alternative claims Providing alternative solutions is not a good reason because they do not make the claim more believable. Consider this argument: "NIU should not have comprehensive exams because students who pass all their classes should be given a diploma. If you do provide an alternative, it is a new claim that needs to be supported by new reasons. Rewording the claim Simply restating the claim does not present a reason because it does not provide support for the claim. For example, "NIU should not have comprehensive exams because exit exams should not be a requirement for getting a diploma". This reason may feel like there is support, but the reason is just another way to say the claim.

6 Elaborate each reason * Write at least a single paragraph for each reason. Each reason must provide strong support for why someone should agree with your claim * In that paragraph explain, elaborate, give examples, and provide evidence, if possible, that supports the reason. If your reader doesn t really understand your reason and its implications, then they will not be convinced by it. * Make sure that the reasons you are providing support the exact claim that you have made, and that you haven t accidentally switched claims simply because you ve thought of a good reason. Presenting and Rebutting Common Counter Arguments * Readers usually think of at least one objection to your main claim, and, often, their objection will preoccupy them to the extent that they won t be able to focus on the argument you are presenting no matter how brilliant. * Address this by posing the potential objections and arguing against them so that the readers can dismiss them and be convinced by the rest of your argument. * Research has found that people are more persuaded by arguments that mention a common counter-argument and then rebut it. Further, your reader will be more convinced of your authority if you can dismiss something that the other side will say because it shows that you ve given the matter critical thought. Response to counter-arguments (We got to this slide)!! There are three main ways to deal with a counter-arguments that, if done well, will strengthen not weaken your argument. 1. Dismiss A dismissal is where you assert that counter-argument is simply false or irrelevant. Avoid or use sparingly! Some say such exams are invalid measures of what people learn, but that is not true. 2. Concessions A concession is where you accept a counter- argument. It is true that many students might find it stressful to take a comprehensive exam. 3. Rebuttal A rebuttal is an argument against a counter-claim. Strongest approach! Some argue that comprehensive exams do more harm than good. However, several studies have shown that universities and colleges that starting giving such exams got a reversal in the decline scores on standardized achievement test.

7 Response: Dismiss * Avoid or use dismissals sparingly. It reminds one of our childhood is not is so exchanges. * An argument is about providing evidence or reasons so rebuttals are more persuasive and better formed than dismissals. * Special audience considerations: * Dismissals can offend audiences, especially hostile audiences, and make you appear unfair or inconsiderate. In general dismissals are bad form and not effective. Dismissing counter-claims can make you appear unknowledgeable or unskilled in argumentation. Response: Concession * In concession, you are acknowledging that there is some merit to the audiences worries or beliefs. There are times where something is not really controversial so you have to concede it. For example, Testing students can be an effective motivator for learning. * Do not concede points that are so important that agreeing to the truth of it will weaken your argument. Conceding a point can be an effective part of your presentation if the claim you accept is not central to your own position and your own rebuttal reason would be weak. Special audience considerations: * Conceding points on which you agree with the audience makes you appear fair and creates common ground, especially to ambivalent and uninformed audiences. Response: Rebut * Rebuttal is when you argue against the opposing view by presenting reasons or evidence to show that it is weak, illogical, irrelevant, or factually wrong. * Select rebuttals that you think will be acceptable to your audience. Just like reasons, rebuttals are not universally strong. Their power depends on the audience s beliefs and knowledge. Special audience considerations: * The rebuttal, if done well, can reinforce a friendly or ambivalent audience s belief in the claim you are arguing for. * A strong rebuttal can undercut other side arguments especially for ambivalent, uninformed and undecided members.

8 Global organization 1. Try to begin your argument by building a connection with audience and getting them to see the importance of the topic. Often it is best to start with this to engage your audience and break through any resistant attitudes they may have adopted before even reading your argument. 2. Make sure to provide enough information or context so your audience will understand your position. This is where you need to consider your audiences knowledge or beliefs. But you definitely don t want to include background or details that are unnecessary. It is insulting and boring. 3. State your claim clearly and present strong reasons that will be acceptable to your target audience. 4. Acknowledge the most obvious objection and rebut it if possible. Be respectful to those you disagree with. 5. Put your counter where it will be most effective for your audience. If you have a hostile audience it may be best to start from their perspective and work them around to your perspective. For other audiences, mention it when it would naturally be thought about. 6. End strong.

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very) How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very) NIU should require all students to pass a comprehensive exam in order to graduate because such exams have been shown to be effective for improving

More information

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing

Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Persuasive/ Argumentative writing Learning targets I can write arguments to support claims using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. I can introduce precise claims, distinguish the claim

More information

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always

More information

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence. Body Paragraphs Notes W1: Argumentative Writing a. Claim Statement Introduce precise claim Paragraph Structure organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons,

More information

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Overview: Application: What to Avoid: UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,

More information

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS The Extended Investigation Critical Thinking Test assesses the ability of students to produce arguments, and to analyse and assess

More information

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING SEVENTH EDITION JOHN D. RAMAGE, JOHN C. BEAN, AND JUNE JOHNSON PART 2: WRITING PROJECTS CHAPTER 13 WRITING A CLASSICAL ARGUMENT Chapter 13 Learning Objectives In this

More information

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008) Module by: The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication. E-mail the author Summary: This module presents techniques

More information

Writing the Persuasive Essay

Writing the Persuasive Essay Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasive/argument essay? In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to convince the reader to believe or do something Persuasive

More information

Claim-trigger module

Claim-trigger module Claim-trigger module Believability of Statements Imagine reading a novel. The truth of the statements presented in the novel usually doesn t matter. We are often willing to suspend our disbelief while

More information

Persuasive Essay. Writing Workshop. writer s road map

Persuasive Essay. Writing Workshop. writer s road map Writing Workshop We must clean up toxic waste now! Vote for me! My client is innocent! When an issue affects you deeply, you want to convince others to agree with you. Expressing your thoughts on a topic

More information

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone

More information

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because. Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches

More information

Counterarguments. This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument.

Counterarguments. This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument. Counterarguments This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument. 3. Give examples of counterarguments 4. We will complete the activities in class to practice

More information

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis

More information

Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments

Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments Objectives By the end of today s lesson you will be able to: Make a counter-argument to a view that has been expressed, addressing weaknesses in the argument

More information

There are a number of writing problems that occur frequently enough to deserve special mention here:

There are a number of writing problems that occur frequently enough to deserve special mention here: 1. Overview: A. What is an essay? The primary focus of an essay is to explain and clarify your understanding of and opinion about a particular topic, much like an editorial or essay article in a newspaper

More information

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument

More information

Critical Thinking. Separating Fact From Fiction

Critical Thinking. Separating Fact From Fiction Critical Thinking Separating Fact From Fiction What will be covered today? Part 1: What is critical thinking and why do we need to do it? Part 2: How to assess an argument. Part 3: How to write a critical

More information

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106 Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models English 106 The Toulmin Model Developed by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin in the 1950 s Emphasizes that logic often based on probability

More information

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to

More information

The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it!

The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it! MPS Chap. 16 The Strategy of Persuasion The focus of persuasion is not on the source, the message, or the receiver, but on all of them equally. They all cooperate to make a persuasive process. The idea

More information

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay Prep Writing Persuasive Essay Purpose: The writer will learn how to effectively plan, draft, and compose a persuasive essay using the writing process. Objectives: The learner will: Demonstrate an understanding

More information

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

More information

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance).

Write three supporting reasons that would convince the reader to agree with your position (in order of importance). Brainstorm for Persuasive Essay with counterargument TOPIC OR PROBLEM: What do you want the reader to believe? Start here: COUNTERARGUMENT: Why might someone disagree with you? SOLUTION OR COMPROMISE:

More information

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue If it is well known, you may simply mention the topic If it is less familiar, you may need to explain it and define key terms Asserting a clear, unequivocal

More information

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT 30-minute Argument Essay SKILLS TESTED Your ability to articulate complex ideas clearly and effectively Your ability to examine claims and accompanying evidence Your

More information

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Argumentative Writing 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4 Unit Objectives IWBAT - Write an argumentative essay that supports claims in an analysis of a topic and uses valid reasoning,

More information

The Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing

The Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing The Writing Centre s Guide to Persuasive Writing This PowerPoint is the property of Humber College s Writing Centre and cannot be reproduced without the consent of the Writing Centre - 2016 WRITING TUTORS

More information

Drafting an Argument. Main Page. Rogerian Method. Page 1 of 11

Drafting an Argument. Main Page. Rogerian Method.   Page 1 of 11 Writing@CSU Writing Guide Drafting an Argument This Writing Guide was downloaded from the Writing@CSU Web Site at Colorado State University on October 13, 2018 at 3:08 AM. You can view the guide at https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=56.

More information

INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY

INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY INTRODUCTION Hook Thesis/ Claim Hooks can include: Relate a dramatic anecdote. Expose a commonly held belief. Present surprising facts and statistics. Use a fitting quotation.

More information

What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays?

What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays? What is the difference between Expository Essays and Persuasive Essays? Defining Persuasive Writing Persuasive Writing: Writing that has as its purpose convincing others to accept the writer s position

More information

Intro: The Toulmin Model for Arguments

Intro: The Toulmin Model for Arguments Intro: The Toulmin Model for Arguments The Toulmin Argument The twentieth-century British philosopher Stephen Toulmin noticed that good, realistic arguments typically will consist of six parts: Claim:

More information

Five Paragraph Essay. Structure, Elements, Advice

Five Paragraph Essay. Structure, Elements, Advice Five Paragraph Essay Structure, Elements, Advice Structure - 5 paragraphs 1) Introductory Paragraph (Intro) a) Hook, Connection, Thesis 2) Body Paragraph One a) 1st subtopic - follow format 3) Body Paragraph

More information

EBSCO Publishing. Student Success Tools

EBSCO Publishing. Student Success Tools EBSCO Publishing A Student Guide to s and Debates Care in the choice of one s words is the respect that the mind pays to the instrument of its own being. Ashley Montague The purpose of this guide is to

More information

Everything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument

Everything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument Everything s An Argument Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument Arguments to Inform Convince Explore Make Decisions Meditate/Pray Arguments to INFORM Presenting specific information to inform readers Example:

More information

CCR Standards Conference Handouts, Part II Mary Ann Corley Devens, Massachusetts November 19-20, 2015

CCR Standards Conference Handouts, Part II Mary Ann Corley Devens, Massachusetts November 19-20, 2015 Connecting the Dots: Aligning Standards and Instructional Activities: Part II. Writing the Constructed Response CCR Standards Conference, Devens, MA November 2015 PPT #2. Objectives Mary Ann Corley, Ph.D.

More information

PERSUASIVE PAPER NAME:

PERSUASIVE PAPER NAME: NAME: PERSUASIVE PAPER In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to convince the reader to believe or do something. Persuasive writing is often used in advertisements

More information

THE ESSAY. Some tips for writing good introductions Strategies for writing good introductions

THE ESSAY. Some tips for writing good introductions Strategies for writing good introductions THE ESSAY Thesis statements Introductions The body Conclusions Some tips for writing good introductions Strategies for writing good introductions 1. The funnel method 2. Defining a word or phrase 3. Asking

More information

Writing the Argumentative Essay

Writing the Argumentative Essay Writing the Argumentative Essay CHOOSING A TOPIC To begin an argumentative essay, you must first have an opinion you want others to share. Possible Topic Ideas Should boxing be banned? Should the driving

More information

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005)

Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) General There are two alternative strategies which can be employed when answering questions in a multiple-choice test. Some

More information

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

PHI 1700: Global Ethics PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 3 February 11th, 2016 Harman, Ethics and Observation 1 (finishing up our All About Arguments discussion) A common theme linking many of the fallacies we covered is that

More information

DO YOU WANT TO WRITE:

DO YOU WANT TO WRITE: DO YOU WANT TO WRITE: -CONFIDENTLY? -CLEARLY? -FLUENTLY? -LOGICALLY? -RELEVANTLY? -DISTINCTIVELY? --PERSUASIVELY? YES? EXCELLENT. LET S GET STARTED! HOW TO WRITE PERSUASIVELY Dear Students, Practice makes

More information

Argumentative Writing

Argumentative Writing Argumentative Writing Anca T-Hummel NBCT-AYA/ELA taus-hummel@phoenixunion.org Joanna Nichols I.L. English jnichols@phoenixunion.org ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that

More information

Refutation Paragraphs

Refutation Paragraphs Refutation Paragraphs The refutation paragraph is normally found ONLY in argument essays and argument research papers; it is also known as the concession paragraph. When students are writing an argumentative

More information

Writing the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay

Writing the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay Writing the Argumentative/Persuasive Essay To begin an argumentative/persuasive essay, you must first have an opinion you want others to share. RESEARCH To be valid, an opinion or point of view must be

More information

I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook.

I would like to summarize and expand upon some of the important material presented on those web pages and in the textbook. Hello once again! Essay Assignment 1 I would like to give you some suggestions now that should help you as you are working on Essay Assignment 1. This presentation is somewhat long, but the information

More information

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). TOPIC: You need to be able to: Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims). Organize arguments that we read into a proper argument

More information

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It

More information

The Toulmin Model in Brief

The Toulmin Model in Brief The Toulmin Model in Brief A popular form of argument is the Toulmin model (other forms include classical and Rogerian). This model is named after Stephen Toulmin, who in The Uses of Argument proposed

More information

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates All debaters must be financial members of the NZYF Club for which they are debating at the time of each debate. 1. Each team shall consist of three speakers. 2. Responsibilities

More information

I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS a I TAKE ISSUE WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS In persuasive or argumentative writing, we try to convince others to agree with our facts, share our values, accept our argument and conclusions, and adopt our

More information

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Expert Witness Packet Responsibilities: You will review the activity and the perspectives we learned and discussed when we asked whether we trusted people to decide whether a

More information

Convincing People You re Right, With Style. actuality it is not. Writing in this form is simply making use of both critical thought, and

Convincing People You re Right, With Style. actuality it is not. Writing in this form is simply making use of both critical thought, and Everett Butler Hanson Advanced Comp. January, 4, 2018 Convincing People You re Right, With Style Abstract The idea of philosophical writing may seem high minded and intimidating at first, but in actuality

More information

Controlling Idea: Claims

Controlling Idea: Claims Controlling Idea: Claims The controlling idea (thesis) of an essay is the one main idea which the writer wishes the reader to remember. A controlling idea may be expository (informative, explanatory, or

More information

This document consists of 10 printed pages.

This document consists of 10 printed pages. Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level THINKING SKILLS 9694/43 Paper 4 Applied Reasoning MARK SCHEME imum Mark: 50 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid

More information

Skill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging

Skill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging Joshua Foster - 21834444-05018100 Page 1 Exam 050181 - Persuasive Writing Traits of Good Writing Review pages 164-169 in your study guide for a complete explanation of the rating you earned for each trait

More information

Old Redford Academy Preparatory High School

Old Redford Academy Preparatory High School Old Redford Academy Preparatory High School Summer Reading & Assignment For students entering 9 th Grade in Fall Assignment: Argumentative Essay Graphic Organizer Reading Options (Choose One) Metamorphoses

More information

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean?? Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda So many terms...what do they all mean?? Learning Targets Argumentative Reading Unit LT 1: I can cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports what the text

More information

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery; IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary

More information

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous

More information

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25 Like this study set? Create a free account to save it. Create a free account Accident Adapting Ad hominem attack (Attack on the person) Advantage Affirmative

More information

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013 A Correlation of Prentice Hall U.S. History 2013 A Correlation of, 2013 Table of Contents Grades 9-10 Reading Standards for... 3 Writing Standards for... 9 Grades 11-12 Reading Standards for... 15 Writing

More information

Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?

Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested? Writing a Thesis Statement 7 th Grade English Argument Essay Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?

More information

To what extent should we embrace the ideological perspective(s) reflected in the source?

To what extent should we embrace the ideological perspective(s) reflected in the source? Social Studies -1 Major Writing Assignment The purpose of the major writing assignment in Social Studies is to assess student ability and skill of interpretation and argumentation when presented with a

More information

The Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay The Argumentative Essay but what is the difference between an argument and a quarrel? Academic argumentation is based on logical, structured evidence that attempts the reader to accept an opinion, take

More information

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Introduction Symbolic Logic An Introduction to Symbolic Logic Copyright 2006 by Terence Parsons all rights reserved CONTENTS Chapter One Sentential Logic with 'if' and 'not' 1 SYMBOLIC NOTATION 2 MEANINGS OF THE SYMBOLIC NOTATION

More information

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8 correlated to the Indiana Academic English/Language Arts Grade 8 READING READING: Fiction RL.1 8.RL.1 LEARNING OUTCOME FOR READING LITERATURE Read and

More information

Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor

Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor The Persuasive Essay Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor What to expect You have finished your first complete essay! Now that you understand the basic essay structure, you re going to try writing a couple

More information

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

More information

Annotated Works Consulted

Annotated Works Consulted Annotated Works Consulted Step One Find the sources Tip: Find more than 12 sources, because some may not be as informative or ontopic as they first appear. Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder

More information

What the author is SAYING The Gettysburg Address What the author is DOING

What the author is SAYING The Gettysburg Address What the author is DOING Directions: 1. Dissect the SAT prompt and write the CLAIM on the top of this page. 2. Closely read and analyze the text. On the left, write notes on what the author is saying, that is the main ideas. On

More information

IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE

IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE By RICHARD FELDMAN Closure principles for epistemic justification hold that one is justified in believing the logical consequences, perhaps of a specified sort,

More information

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013 A Correlation of Prentice Hall Survey Edition 2013 Table of Contents Grades 9-10 Reading Standards... 3 Writing Standards... 10 Grades 11-12 Reading Standards... 18 Writing Standards... 25 2 Reading Standards

More information

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Defense Attorney Packet

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Defense Attorney Packet Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Defense Attorney Packet Responsibilities: Your job is to prove George Milton s innocence or argue that he should not be punished for his killing of Lennie Small. Your team needs

More information

Reading Critically LEARNING SKILLS

Reading Critically LEARNING SKILLS Reading Critically LEARNING SKILLS Discussion IS THIS A STRONG ARGUMENT? Women are much better at handling stress than men. For example, my mother can think more clearly in a stressful situation than my

More information

Comments on Lasersohn

Comments on Lasersohn Comments on Lasersohn John MacFarlane September 29, 2006 I ll begin by saying a bit about Lasersohn s framework for relativist semantics and how it compares to the one I ve been recommending. I ll focus

More information

How to Write a Philosophy Paper

How to Write a Philosophy Paper How to Write a Philosophy Paper The goal of a philosophy paper is simple: make a compelling argument. This guide aims to teach you how to write philosophy papers, starting from the ground up. To do that,

More information

Checking Your Arguments

Checking Your Arguments Checking Your Arguments There are two ways of checking the significance and logical validity of your arguments. One is a "positive" check, making sure your essay includes certain specific features, and

More information

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation VI. RULES OF PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE A. General 1. Public Forum Debate is a form of two-on-two debate which ask debaters to discuss a current events issue. 2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development

More information

POINTERS ON WRITING AN ESSAY FOR XAT 5 TIPS ON WRITING A GOOD ESSAY

POINTERS ON WRITING AN ESSAY FOR XAT 5 TIPS ON WRITING A GOOD ESSAY POINTERS ON WRITING AN ESSAY FOR XAT 5 TIPS ON WRITING A GOOD ESSAY Be Original: Even seemingly boring essay topics can sound interesting if creatively approached. If writing about a gymnastics competition

More information

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating

More information

4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS

4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS Argumentative Performance Task Focus Standards Grade 8: W.8.5; L.8.1; L.8.2 4-Point Argumentative Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 6 11) SCORE 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT NS ORGANIZATION

More information

Thesis Statement. What is a Thesis Statement? What is a Thesis Statement Not?

Thesis Statement. What is a Thesis Statement? What is a Thesis Statement Not? Thesis Statement What is a Thesis Statement? A thesis statement is an argument that clearly states the point of view of the author, and outlines how the author intends to support his or her argument. The

More information

CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985)

CRITICAL THINKING. Critical thinking is reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do. (Ennis (1985) CRITICAL THINKING Critical thinking is "reasonably and reflectively deciding what to believe or do." (Ennis (1985) Critical thinking is "the art of thinking about your thinking while you are thinking in

More information

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE A. General 1. All debates must be based on the current National High School Debate resolution chosen under the auspices of the National Topic Selection Committee of the

More information

The Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay The Argumentative Essay Features of an argument Organized around convincing someone else that the claim is true Using evidence (grounds), warrants (reasons), and backing to support your claim We argue

More information

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? . What is the purpose of argumentation? Argumentation 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument? According to Toulmin (964), the checking list can be outlined as follows: () The Claim

More information

Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point

Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point Claim - Expresses your position or stand on the issue (YOUR OPINION ON A TOPIC) - States precisely what you believe (and perhaps WHY you believe it) - This is the viewpoint you want readers to accept or

More information

Retrospectives I. Structure

Retrospectives I. Structure 21W.730 May 16, 2001 Retrospectives I. Structure I selected three autobiographical pieces and one analytical for the portfolio. The order is: Multi-Threaded Thing, an autobiographical paper which took

More information

IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY. Jennifer Saul

IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY. Jennifer Saul IMPLICIT BIAS, STEREOTYPE THREAT, AND TEACHING PHILOSOPHY Jennifer Saul Implicit Biases: those that we will be concerned with here are unconscious biases that affect the way we perceive, evaluate, or interact

More information

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand), Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise

More information

ARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING

ARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING ARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING THESIS STATEMENTS A thesis statement manages to encapsulate an essay s main argument in a one-sentence succinct statement. Writers often find it useful to create a road map thesis,

More information

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade by Dr. John R. Edlund, Cal Poly Pomona Over 2,000 years ago the Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that there were three basic ways to persuade an audience

More information

REVIEW: Marc Lange, Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature.

REVIEW: Marc Lange, Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature. REVIEW: Marc Lange, Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature. Author(s): Christopher Belanger Source: Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science,

More information

ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT

ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT Adapted from Reading Rhetorically (A Reader for Writers), 2nd edition by Virginia A. Chappell and Alice M. Gillam and Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings,

More information

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1

Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1 Tools Andrew Black CS 305 1 Critical Thinking Everyone thinks, all the time Why Critical Thinking? Much of our thinking is biased, distorted, partial, uninformed, or down-right prejudiced. This costs us

More information

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim

More information

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science 1. Social Science Essays Social sciences encompass a range of disciplines; each discipline uses a range of techniques, styles, and structures of writing.

More information

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT 30- minute Argument Essay SKILLS TESTED Your ability to articulate complex ideas clearly and effectively Your ability to examine claims and accompanying evidence Your

More information