DETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little
|
|
- Claud Carson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DETERMINISM is the view that all events without exception are effects or, a little more carefully, that every event is fully caused by its antecedent conditions or causal circumstances. The conditions or circumstances too are effects of prior sufficient causes, and so on. There are two sets of questions attending determinism. The first has to do with the proper characterization of determinism, and whether or not the thesis is true. The second concerns the implications of determinism for morality, religion, punishment, psychology and other such things which seem to depend on or presuppose the possibility of free choice or action. We will consider both sets of questions together; they are not easy to keep separate. Getting the thesis of determinism into clear view, putting flesh on the bare definition above, is not easy either. Determinism is sometimes explained by pointing to predictability. La Place, for example, maintains that if a powerful enough intellect knew all the facts about the location and motion of every particle in the universe, and knew too the laws of nature and a little mathematics, then it could in principle predict the location and motion of every particle in the universe at any time in the future. It is a compelling thought but not much help in clarifying the thesis of determinism talk of predictability seems to depend on or presuppose the thesis, rather than explain it. Some try to cash the thesis out in terms of current scientific theory, and certainly Newton s achievements led many to determinism. The clockwork picture of the universe, with all matter in motion in space obeying a set of causal laws, leads easily to the view that every event stands in a nomothetic relation to certain others preceding it in the chain. Recently, interpretations of Quantum Theory and the uncertainty principle have persuaded some that determinism must be false. However,
2 it is not obvious that micro-level events, about which Quantum Theory has something to say, have effects on macro-level events, about which the theory is largely silent and where determinism seems to matter. The things at the level of everyday observation seem bound up by causal laws, whether or not this is so for the particles of which they are composed. It is also true that freedom is not the same thing as indeterminism, uncertainty or chance. Philosophers, anyway, tend to take the long view, noting that scientific theories come and go. Tying the truth or an understanding of determinism to our current scientific conception of the universe, some might unkindly say our best guess, seems to many a little short-sighted. Philosophical views of determinism. What matters to us are not particles and quanta, but beliefs, desires, hopes and choices and this point can be made without begging any questions concerning the metaphysics of things like beliefs and desires. Even if one is unwilling to embrace a thoroughgoing materialism about the mind, it is at least a going proposition that mental events, whatever they are, stand in apparently causal relations to states of the brain. Brain states, it almost goes without saying, are as physical as anything. Even a dualist can be troubled by determinism. On most readings of the truth of determinism, the upshot is that human freedom is at best problematic. If every event is an effect of prior causes and, say, your choosing to look up determinism in this book is an event, then your choosing appears as causal as anything which might happen on a billiard table. It might have felt, on the inside, that you looked the term up on a whim or even for a good reason, but rewind the universe as far back into the past as you like and run it all forwards again, and causal forces will conspire to plant that whim or reason even the feeling
3 of freedom in your head and move your hand towards the bookshelf as certainly as a billiard ball follows a precise trajectory when struck at a certain angle. The point can be pressed further by thinking not of looking up a definition, but of acts we condemn as morally wrong or acts we praise as heroic. Is there room at all for free will in, as James puts it, the iron block universe? Philosophers have settled into two camps in response to this question. Incompatiblists maintain that if determinism is true, there can be no freedom. Some, notably Descartes, go on to deny the thesis of determinism outright, arguing instead for some doctrine of origination, an uncaused or self-caused act of will underlying free choice. Whether origination comes to much is uncertain. To wrench the will from the causal web entirely might result in freedom, but what help is an uncaused or random will? There might be other, empirical worries rooted in the study of human behaviour for thinking that Descartes has to be wrong in characterising the will as utterly undetermined. Other incompatibilists, so-called hard determinists, accept determinism and deny the existence of human freedom outright. Compatibilists, such as Hobbes and Mill, take it that freedom and determinism are compatible, arguing for a view of freedom understood in terms of voluntary or uncompelled action. A person in prison or forced into a course of action at gunpoint is not free, but individuals not so compelled might be. Freedom, on this view, is not a matter of uncaused or undetermined action, but voluntary action. The causal antecedents of free human actions are, as some put it, internal to the agent, consisting in his or her hopes, desires and general character, as opposed to causal factors outside the agent, such as handcuffs, hypnotists or prison walls. It is easy to feel a little short-
4 changed by compatibilism, as causal antecedents internal to an agent are still causal antecedents. The action, although voluntary, is still determined. Recently, Honderich has argued that compatibilism and incompatibilism are false, as they both suppose that we have just one conception of freedom, when in fact we have two. One conception involves origination and voluntary action, and the other involves just voluntary action. The upshot, for Honderich, has to do with attitudes, the response we give to the truth of determinism. On his view some positive or sustaining attitudes towards our life-hopes, moral responsibilities, and so on really are possible, once the two conceptions of freedom are recognized and thought through. Most arguments for versions of determinism depend on the claim that the thesis of determinism is just part of the warp and weft of human thinking. It is only on the assumption that every event has a cause that we can come to an understanding of the physical universe. While Hume argued that causal necessity is not, strictly speaking, in the world, seeing events as caused is part of the human factory specification. For Hume, thinking causally is not just the only way to understand the empirical world, it is something we cannot help, a natural custom or habit of mind. Kant took the so-called principle of universal causation as a fundamental category of the understanding, a part of the condition of the experience of an empirical world of objects. Without thinking causally, he argues, we could not have the experience we actually have. Seeing the world in terms of cause and effect is the only way to understand any object of knowledge. Determinism is not something we could give up; the question of determinism is not an open one.
5 No less forceful intuitions accompany the thinking in favour of freedom. The world we experience includes ourselves, and from the inside we do have the experience of freedom. It seems to us that there are moments of choice, instances in which it is up to us to take some action as opposed to another. Determinism might not be something we can give up with respect to an understanding of objects, but it is something we can scarcely take seriously with respect to an understanding of ourselves. We have just as much difficulty trying to understand an uncaused car accident as we have in genuinely accepting that our inner experience of freedom is an illusion. Even the hardest of hard determinists does not simply wait to see what he chooses for dinner. Although Kant argues that determinism is a precondition of understanding the empirical world, he maintains that freedom is no less a precondition of practical action. There is a distinction for Kant between thinking about objects and thinking about action, theoretical as against practical reasoning. We have no choice but to think deterministically if we want to know something about the world, and when we want to act, we cannot help but think of ourselves as free. Kant s line, it seems to many, underlines rather than resolves the difficulty. Religious controversies. Philosophical controversies concerning determinism are matched by those in theology, though the emphasis is clearly different. In Christian and other theologies, god is characterized as all-knowing, allpowerful, and all-good. Determinism can seem to follow quickly from these attributes. Reflection on the problem of evil and divine punishment and reward can tug in the opposite direction.
6 If god knows everything, this must include future facts, and the choices one has yet to make are among those facts. Presumably, god knows the choices we will make before we make them, and this suggests that our choices are not really choices at all. Either human beings are not free and god knows what we will do before we do it, or humans have a measure of freedom, compromising god s knowledge. If god s all-embracing knowledge is something the theist is not willing to dispense with, then human freedom has to give. There are obvious questions concerning the coherence of divine reward and punishment, heaven and hell, if it turns out that no one really chooses to seek or avoid salvation or sin. St. Augustine, and later Aquinas, argues that there is a distinction between knowing what will happen and causing what will happen. God knows what we are going to do because we are going to do it: our doing it is not caused by his knowing. Both thinkers maintain that worries about determinism and god s knowledge depend on temporal categories which do not actually apply to god. God s eternity, a kind of existence outside of time, makes it possible for him to observe all events at once or, better, independently of time. There is no real sense in which god knows about our choices before we choose them, as the very notion of before is not truly applicable to god s knowledge. Similar motivations for determinism arise in connection with the consideration of god s omnipotence. If human beings really are free, then there is a clear sense in which humans might confound god s plans, might do something god did not intend. Worse, for Luther and Calvin, the thought that freely chosen human action could, in a
7 sense, nudge a person towards salvation seemed to restrict god s power intolerably. By acting in a certain way, it would seem, a person could force god s hand, make god react appropriately by opening wide the pearly gates. For some thinkers one could be saved from sin not by human choice, but only by being chosen by god. Again, if human freedom is limited in this way, no sense can be made of divine reward and punishment. God s goodness, too, suggests a kind of determinism. The notion that a good creator could create only a good world, fixed on a settled path, was first scouted by the Ancient Greeks. The Stoics contended that nature was both divine and cyclical, consisting in eternally repeating cycles of life and cataclysmic conflagration. The Stoic s famous steadfast indifference to the vagaries of life is partially explained by their view that whatever happens, happens for the best, for the good aims of the universe itself. The view has echoes in Leibniz, who argues that the goodness of god implies that this world is the only world that god could have created, the best of all possible worlds. The question of human freedom also arises in controversies concerning the problem of evil, which might pull the theist away from determinism. The problem of evil, roughly, is the claim that the following four propositions are incompatible, that is to say that they cannot all be true together: god is omniscient, god is omnipotent, god is omnibenevolent, and evil exists. As the last is undeniable, one of the other three must be false, which amounts to the claim that god as traditionally conceived does not exist.
8 In response, some theists distinguish between natural evil and human or moral evil. The former are so-called acts of god, natural disasters like earthquakes and hurricanes. The latter is the evil that men do: war, murder, theft and so on. Natural evil is then explained away with talk of soul-building. The idea being that virtue requires a struggle against hardship, and natural evil is a kind of necessary test or midwife of the virtues. In any case, God is not responsible for human evil, it is argued, as this is the result of freely chosen human action. The gift of free will is itself good, it is claimed, and if we squander it on evil actions, the fault is our own. The free will defence, as it is called, is found wanting by some thinkers, particularly following reflection on god s attributes. If god is all-knowing, it is argued, he would have known beforehand the disastrous consequences of creating human beings with the capacity to choose evil. Knowing this, and equipping us with free will anyway, god seems ultimately responsible for the evil we choose. If god is all-powerful, why did he not design us so as to freely choose the good? There are replies to these questions, and replies to those replies. Nearby conceptions and the depth of the problem. The general thesis of determinism pursued here is not the only conception in the neighbourhood. Logical determinism, first noticed by the Ancient Greeks but still under consideration today, begins with the innocent claim that every statement is either true or false. Propositions about future human decisions or courses of action are statements, and they too must be either true or false. Logical determinism settles the future as clearly as other determinisms do but without talk of causation.
9 Doctrines of fatalism and predestination can also be distinguished from the general thesis of determinism. Fatalism is the view that no matter what one does, one s future or fate is settled. This implies that there is no point in planning, deliberating or preparing for the future. The idle argument, again first formulated by the Greeks, has it that if one is ill, there is no point in calling a doctor. If one is going to recover (or not), one will recover (or not) regardless of what the doctor or anyone else does. A determinist is committed to the view that all events are effects, not that some events are fated to happen regardless of the preceding causal path. Talk of predestination or destiny implies a supernatural cause in the chain, either setting the lot in motion for a general aim or fixing one s future for some particular end. Determinism as understood in most contemporary thinking has it that all causes are natural, not supernatural, and carries with it no commitment to the view that the causal sequence has some general aim or end. Reflection on the long pedigree of determinism and nearby conceptions can lead one to the view that the question of human freedom is an unusually deep one. Before even philosophy got underway, humans had suspicions deterministic in flavour, and those suspicions have proved remarkably resilient. Perhaps the earliest suspicions resulted from the difficulties attending a difficult life, the experience of trying and failing regardless. Some contemporary considerations of determinism retain something of this defeatism, a worry that what we do can make no difference, that the most human of concerns are based on an illusion, that our thoughts are not really our own. The ancient worries are still with us, because what is at issue is what matters most.
10 Controversies, both philosophical and religious, exhibit a pattern that is suggestive of the depth of the problem too. Both philosophers and theologians have bumped into a set of conflicting intuitions. Both are drawn towards determinism in an effort to understand what each take to be the fundamental nature of reality, as considered apart from human concerns. For the philosopher, this is a world of objects in causal relations, and for the theist, this is a creator or a created order. Both, too, are dragged away from determinism when the focus narrows to human interests. For the philosopher, there is the experience of freedom, and for the theist, there are the choices underpinning salvation and sin. The conflicting intuitions cannot both be right, but it is not clear that either set can be rejected. Bibliography Aquinas, T. Summa Theologica, Part I. ed T. Gilby, 60 vols, London, Ekstrom, L. W. Free Will: A Philosophical Study. Boulder: Westview, Hobbes, T. Of Liberty and Necessity in W. Molesworth (ed.) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 5, London: Scientia Aalen, Honderich, T. A Theory of Determinism: The Mind, Neuroscience and Life-Hopes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Hume, D. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Kane, R. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, McFee, G. Free Will. Teddington: Acumen, Mill, J. S. A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Row, Weatherford, R, The Implications of Determinism. London: Routledge, 1991.
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5)
SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5) Introduction We often say things like 'I couldn't resist buying those trainers'. In saying this, we presumably mean that the desire to
More informationFree Will and Determinism
Free Will and Determinism Learning objectives: To understand: - The link between free will and moral responsibility The ethical theories of hard determinism, libertarianism and soft determinism or compatilbilism
More informationComprehensive. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
360 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Comprehensive Compatibilism
More informationMETAPHYSICS. The Problem of Free Will
METAPHYSICS The Problem of Free Will WHAT IS FREEDOM? surface freedom Being able to do what you want Being free to act, and choose, as you will BUT: what if what you will is not under your control? free
More informationPOWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM
POWERS, NECESSITY, AND DETERMINISM Thought 3:3 (2014): 225-229 ~Penultimate Draft~ The final publication is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tht3.139/abstract Abstract: Stephen Mumford
More informationAm I free? Free will vs. determinism
Am I free? Free will vs. determinism Our topic today is, for the second day in a row, freedom of the will. More precisely, our topic is the relationship between freedom of the will and determinism, and
More informationThe Mystery of Free Will
The Mystery of Free Will What s the mystery exactly? We all think that we have this power called free will... that we have the ability to make our own choices and create our own destiny We think that we
More informationA New Argument Against Compatibilism
Norwegian University of Life Sciences School of Economics and Business A New Argument Against Compatibilism Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum Working Papers No. 2/ 2014 ISSN: 2464-1561 A New Argument
More informationCausation and Free Will
Causation and Free Will T L Hurst Revised: 17th August 2011 Abstract This paper looks at the main philosophic positions on free will. It suggests that the arguments for causal determinism being compatible
More informationFree Will [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
8/18/09 9:53 PM The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Free Will Most of us are certain that we have free will, though what exactly this amounts to
More informationDavid Hume, Liberty and Necessity. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII
+ David Hume, Liberty and Necessity An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Section VIII + Liberty and Necessity intractable dispute: Do we have free will ( liberty ), or are choices causally determined
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism At each time t the world is perfectly determinate in all detail. - Let us grant this for the sake of argument. We might want to re-visit this perfectly reasonable assumption
More informationFinal Paper. May 13, 2015
24.221 Final Paper May 13, 2015 Determinism states the following: given the state of the universe at time t 0, denoted S 0, and the conjunction of the laws of nature, L, the state of the universe S at
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationEnding The Scandal. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism.
366 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3b Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3b Free Will Review of definitions Incompatibilists believe that that free will and determinism are not compatible. This means that you can not be both free and determined
More informationFree Will and Determinism
Free Will and Determinism Soft determinism you are free to a certain extent, therefore you are still responsible for your choices. Hard determinism humans are controlled by external forces and have no
More informationHence, you and your choices are a product of God's creation Psychological State. Stephen E. Schmid
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationPhilosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #23 Hume on the Self and Free Will Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Mindreading Video Marcus, Modern
More informationA Taxonomy of Free Will Positions
58 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism A Taxonomy of Free Will
More informationmoral absolutism agents moral responsibility
Moral luck Last time we discussed the question of whether there could be such a thing as objectively right actions -- actions which are right, independently of relativization to the standards of any particular
More informationThe Problem of Freewill. Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty
The Problem of Freewill Blatchford, Robert, Not Guilty Two Common Sense Beliefs Freewill Thesis: some (though not all) of our actions are performed freely we examines and deliberate about our options we
More informationKane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention
Kane is Not Able: A Reply to Vicens Self-Forming Actions and Conflicts of Intention Gregg D Caruso SUNY Corning Robert Kane s event-causal libertarianism proposes a naturalized account of libertarian free
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationChapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
More informationChance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University October 8, 2015 Contents The Principle of Sufficient Reason Against the PSR Chance Fundamental
More informationTHE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
More informationFREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY. James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities
FREE WILL AND DETERMINISM: AN ADOPTION STUDY James J. Lee, Matt McGue University of Minnesota Twin Cities UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA RESEARCH TEAM James J. Lee, Department of Psychology Matt McGue, Department
More informationWhat is the problem?
Unit 3 Freedom What is the problem? Science tells us the universe operates according to consistent and unchanging rules Religion tells us that the universe is subject to the rule of God In either case,
More informationWalter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism
Walter Terence Stace Soft Determinism 1 Compatibilism and soft determinism Stace is not perhaps as convinced as d Holbach that determinism is true. (But that s not what makes him a compatibilist.) The
More informationDoes Theism Imply Determinism? Questions about Hard Determinism. Objections to Hard Determinism, I. Objections to Hard Determinism, II
Questions about Hard Determinism Does Theism Imply Determinism? Assume there is a God and when God created the world God knew all the choices you (and others) were going to make. Hard determinism denies
More informationThe Incoherence of Compatibilism Zahoor H. Baber *
* Abstract The perennial philosophical problem of freedom and determinism seems to have a solution through the widely known philosophical doctrine called Compatibilism. The Compatibilist philosophers contend
More informationUnit 3. Free Will and Determinism. Monday, November 21, 11
Unit 3 Free Will and Determinism I. Introduction A. What is the problem? Science! Why? 1. The universe is governed by physical laws 2. People are part of the universe Therefore: People are governed by
More informationChapter 5: Freedom and Determinism
Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism Let me state at the outset a basic point that will reappear again below with its justification. The title of this chapter (and many other discussions too) make it appear
More informationWhat is the problem?
Unit 3 Freedom What is the problem? Science tells us the universe operates according to consistent and unchanging rules Religion tells us that the universe is subject to the rule of God In either case,
More informationPreface. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism. Illusionism. Impossibilism.
xvi Illusionism Impossibilism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Valerian Model Semicompatibilism Narrow Incompatibilism Soft Incompatibilism Source Incompatibilism
More information16 Free Will Requires Determinism
16 Free Will Requires Determinism John Baer The will is infinite, and the execution confined... the desire is boundless, and the act a slave to limit. William Shakespeare, Troilus and Cressida, III. ii.75
More informationTed Honderich s Semicompatibilism. Determinism
278 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Ted Honderich s Determinism
More informationCompatibilism and the Basic Argument
ESJP #12 2017 Compatibilism and the Basic Argument Lennart Ackermans 1 Introduction In his book Freedom Evolves (2003) and article (Taylor & Dennett, 2001), Dennett constructs a compatibilist theory of
More informationThis handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Compatibilism This handout follows the handout on Determinism. You should read that handout first. COMPATIBILISM I: VOLUNTARY ACTION AS DEFINED IN TERMS OF THE TYPE OF CAUSE FROM WHICH
More informationA Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism
A Coherent and Comprehensible Interpretation of Saul Smilansky s Dualism Abstract Saul Smilansky s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is
More informationPHILOSOPHY A.S. UNIT 2 PAPER, JANUARY 2009 SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO SELECTED QUESTIONS
PHILOSOPHY A.S. UNIT 2 PAPER, JANUARY 2009 SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO SELECTED QUESTIONS In writing the answers to past exam questions, I have referred to AQA s mark schemes (available on their website) as far
More informationToday s Lecture. Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie
Today s Lecture Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie Preliminary comments: A problem with evil The Problem of Evil traditionally understood must presume some or all of the following:
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationFree Will as an Open Scientific Problem
Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem Mark Balaguer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this
More informationDENNETT ON THE BASIC ARGUMENT JOHN MARTIN FISCHER
. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK, and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA METAPHILOSOPHY Vol. 36, No. 4, July 2005 0026-1068 DENNETT ON THE BASIC ARGUMENT
More informationThe Zygote Argument remixed
Analysis Advance Access published January 27, 2011 The Zygote Argument remixed JOHN MARTIN FISCHER John and Mary have fully consensual sex, but they do not want to have a child, so they use contraception
More informationR. G. Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford p : the term cause has at least three different senses:
R. G. Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998. p. 285-6: the term cause has at least three different senses: Sense I. Here that which is caused is the free and deliberate act
More informationA Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility
A Compatibilist Account of Free Will and Moral Responsibility If Frankfurt is right, he has shown that moral responsibility is compatible with the denial of PAP, but he hasn t yet given us a detailed account
More informationBOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid s Theory of Action
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 2005 BOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity:
More informationCompatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued
Compatibilism vs. incompatibilism, continued Jeff Speaks March 24, 2009 1 Arguments for compatibilism............................ 1 1.1 Arguments from the analysis of free will.................. 1 1.2
More informationAlfred Mele s Modest. Hard Determinism Compatibilism. Libertarianism. Soft Determinism. Hard Incompatibilism. Semicompatibilism.
336 Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy Illusionism Determinism Hard Determinism Compatibilism Soft Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Impossibilism Valerian Model Soft Compatibilism Alfred Mele s Modest
More informationPrevious Final Examinations Philosophy 1
Previous Final Examinations Philosophy 1 For each question, please write a short answer of about one paragraph in length. The answer should be written out in full sentences, not simple phrases. No books,
More informationFischer-Style Compatibilism
Fischer-Style Compatibilism John Martin Fischer s new collection of essays, Deep Control: Essays on freewill and value (Oxford University Press, 2012), constitutes a trenchant defence of his well-known
More informationThe Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument
The Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument Richard Johns Department of Philosophy University of British Columbia August 2006 Revised March 2009 The Luck Argument seems to show
More informationBad Luck Once Again. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXVII No. 3, November 2008 Ó 2008 International Phenomenological Society Bad Luck Once Again neil levy Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University
More informationHume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding G. J. Mattey Spring, 2017 / Philosophy 1 After Descartes The greatest success of the philosophy of Descartes was that it helped pave the way for the mathematical
More informationCreighton University, Oct. 13, 2016 Midwest Area Workshop on Metaphysics, Oct. 14, 2016
Social Ontology and Capital: or, The Fetishism of Commodities and the (Metaphysical) Secret Thereof Ruth Groff Creighton University, Oct. 13, 2016 Midwest Area Workshop on Metaphysics, Oct. 14, 2016 1.
More informationCreation & necessity
Creation & necessity Today we turn to one of the central claims made about God in the Nicene Creed: that God created all things visible and invisible. In the Catechism, creation is described like this:
More informationThis handout follows the handout on Hume on causation. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Hume on free will This handout follows the handout on Hume on causation. You should read that handout first. HUMAN ACTION AND CAUSAL NECESSITY In Enquiry VIII, Hume claims that the history
More informationOxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords
Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords ISBN 9780198802693 Title The Value of Rationality Author(s) Ralph Wedgwood Book abstract Book keywords Rationality is a central concept for epistemology,
More informationFree Acts and Chance: Why the Rollback Argument Fails Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley
1 Free Acts and Chance: Why the Rollback Argument Fails Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley ABSTRACT: The rollback argument, pioneered by Peter van Inwagen, purports to show that indeterminism in any form is incompatible
More informationFree Will. Course packet
Free Will PHGA 7457 Course packet Instructor: John Davenport Spring 2008 Fridays 2-4 PM Readings on Eres: 1. John Davenport, "Review of Fischer and Ravizza, Responsibility and Control," Faith and Philosophy,
More informationInconsistency within a Reconciling Project Antony Flew Hume Studies Volume IV, Number 1 (April, 1978), 1-6.
Inconsistency within a Reconciling Project Antony Flew Hume Studies Volume IV, Number 1 (April, 1978), 1-6. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms and Conditions
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationTHE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE
Diametros nr 29 (wrzesień 2011): 80-92 THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE Karol Polcyn 1. PRELIMINARIES Chalmers articulates his argument in terms of two-dimensional
More informationFree Agents as Cause
Free Agents as Cause Daniel von Wachter January 28, 2009 This is a preprint version of: Wachter, Daniel von, 2003, Free Agents as Cause, On Human Persons, ed. K. Petrus. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 183-194.
More informationFr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
More informationThe Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011
The Ontological Argument for the existence of God Pedro M. Guimarães Ferreira S.J. PUC-Rio Boston College, July 13th. 2011 The ontological argument (henceforth, O.A.) for the existence of God has a long
More informationFree Will or Determinism - A Conundrum Mark Dubin February 14, 1994
Free Will or Determinism - A Conundrum Mark Dubin February 14, 1994 Free Will - In a situation with more than one realistically possible choice of about equal likelihood, for example: about face, via turning
More informationDaniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause
Daniel von Wachter Free Agents as Cause The dilemma of free will is that if actions are caused deterministically, then they are not free, and if they are not caused deterministically then they are not
More informationElements of Mind (EM) has two themes, one major and one minor. The major theme is
Summary of Elements of Mind Tim Crane Elements of Mind (EM) has two themes, one major and one minor. The major theme is intentionality, the mind s direction upon its objects; the other is the mind-body
More informationDivine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise
Religious Studies 42, 123 139 f 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/s0034412506008250 Printed in the United Kingdom Divine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise HUGH RICE Christ
More informationCompatibilist Objections to Prepunishment
Florida Philosophical Review Volume X, Issue 1, Summer 2010 7 Compatibilist Objections to Prepunishment Winner of the Outstanding Graduate Paper Award at the 55 th Annual Meeting of the Florida Philosophical
More informationI will briefly summarize each of the 11 chapters and then offer a few critical comments.
Hugh J. McCann (ed.), Free Will and Classical Theism: The Significance of Freedom in Perfect Being Theology, Oxford University Press, 2017, 230pp., $74.00, ISBN 9780190611200. Reviewed by Garrett Pendergraft,
More informationIn this paper I will critically discuss a theory known as conventionalism
Aporia vol. 22 no. 2 2012 Combating Metric Conventionalism Matthew Macdonald In this paper I will critically discuss a theory known as conventionalism about the metric of time. Simply put, conventionalists
More informationChance, Possibility, and Explanation Nina Emery
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Advance Access published October 25, 2013 Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 0 (2013), 1 26 Chance, Possibility, and Explanation ABSTRACT I argue against the common and
More informationCRITICAL STUDY FISCHER ON MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 188 July 1997 ISSN 0031 8094 CRITICAL STUDY FISCHER ON MORAL RESPONSIBILITY BY PETER VAN INWAGEN The Metaphysics of Free Will: an Essay on Control. BY JOHN MARTIN
More informationALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND THE FREE WILL DEFENCE
Rel. Stud. 33, pp. 267 286. Printed in the United Kingdom 1997 Cambridge University Press ANDREW ESHLEMAN ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND THE FREE WILL DEFENCE I The free will defence attempts to show that
More informationFREE ACTS AND CHANCE: WHY THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT FAILS
The Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 63, No. 250 January 2013 ISSN 0031-8094 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00094.x FREE ACTS AND CHANCE: WHY THE ROLLBACK ARGUMENT FAILS BY LARA BUCHAK The rollback argument,
More informationPredictability, Causation, and Free Will
Predictability, Causation, and Free Will Luke Misenheimer (University of California Berkeley) August 18, 2008 The philosophical debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists about free will and determinism
More informationFree Will: Do We Have It?
Free Will: Do We Have It? This book explains the problem of free will and contains a brief summary of the essential arguments in Ayer's "Freedom and Necessity" and Chisholm's "Human Freedom and the Self".
More informationLecture 25 Hume on Causation
Lecture 25 Hume on Causation Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 Ideas and impressions Hume s terminology Ideas: Concepts. Impressions: Perceptions; they are of two kinds. Sensations: Perceptions
More informationPhilosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY. Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University
Philosophical Perspectives, 14, Action and Freedom, 2000 TRANSFER PRINCIPLES AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Eleonore Stump Saint Louis University John Martin Fischer University of California, Riverside It is
More informationWhat does it mean if we assume the world is in principle intelligible?
REASONS AND CAUSES The issue The classic distinction, or at least the one we are familiar with from empiricism is that causes are in the world and reasons are some sort of mental or conceptual thing. I
More informationHABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2007 HABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems Michael Quante In a first step, I disentangle the issues of scientism and of compatiblism
More informationThe Attributes of God
The Attributes of God The nature of God what God is like. Omnipotence People wonder whether the concept of God s omnipotence is compatible with his other attributes omniscience and omnibenevolence: Illogical
More informationMetaphysics and God. Edited by Kevin Timpe. Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. T&F Proofs: Not For Distribution. New York London
Metaphysics and God Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump Edited by Kevin Timpe New York London First published 2009 by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Simultaneously published in the UK by Routledge
More informationFree Will: A Comparative Study. A Senior Honors Thesis
Free Will: A Comparative Study A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in Philosophy in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio
More informationAccording to Russell, do we know the self by acquaintance? (hint: the answer is not yes )
Russell KNOWLEDGE BY ACQUAINTANCE AND KNOWLEDGE BY DESCRIPTION Russell asserts that there are three types of things that we know by acquaintance. The first is sense-data. Another is universals. What are
More informationTHE POSSIBILITY OF AN ALL-KNOWING GOD
THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ALL-KNOWING GOD The Possibility of an All-Knowing God Jonathan L. Kvanvig Assistant Professor of Philosophy Texas A & M University Palgrave Macmillan Jonathan L. Kvanvig, 1986 Softcover
More informationDavid Hume. Walter Terence Stace. Soft Determinism. Dan Dennett
David Hume Walter Terence Stace Soft Determinism Dan Dennett 1 Soft determinism Soft determinism combines two claims: i. Causal determinism is true ii. Humans have free will N.B. Soft determinists are
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3e Free Will
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 3e Free Will The video Free Will and Neurology attempts to provide scientific evidence that A. our free will is the result of a single free will neuron. B. our sense that
More informationproper construal of Davidson s principle of rationality will show the objection to be misguided. Andrew Wong Washington University, St.
Do e s An o m a l o u s Mo n i s m Hav e Explanatory Force? Andrew Wong Washington University, St. Louis The aim of this paper is to support Donald Davidson s Anomalous Monism 1 as an account of law-governed
More informationIncompatibilism (1) Anti Free Will Arguments
Determinism and Free Will (4) Incompatibilism (1) Anti Free Will Arguments Incompatibilism is the view that a deterministic universe is completely at odds with the notion that persons have a free will.
More informationSimplicity and Why the Universe Exists
Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists QUENTIN SMITH I If big bang cosmology is true, then the universe began to exist about 15 billion years ago with a 'big bang', an explosion of matter, energy and space
More informationThe cosmological argument (continued)
The cosmological argument (continued) Remember that last time we arrived at the following interpretation of Aquinas second way: Aquinas 2nd way 1. At least one thing has been caused to come into existence.
More informationPhilosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas
Philosophy of Religion 21:161-169 (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas A defense of middle knowledge RICHARD OTTE Cowell College, University of Calfiornia, Santa Cruz,
More information1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought
1/7 The Postulates of Empirical Thought This week we are focusing on the final section of the Analytic of Principles in which Kant schematizes the last set of categories. This set of categories are what
More informationIf God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang?
If God brought about the Big Bang, did he do that before the Big Bang? Daniel von Wachter Email: daniel@abc.de replace abc by von-wachter http://von-wachter.de International Academy of Philosophy, Santiago
More information