# In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES Instructions: Determine whether the following are propositions. If some are not propositions, see if they can be rewritten as propositions. (1) I have a very refined sense of smell. (2) Not here, Bob! (3) I think I m going to sell little Joey into slavery. Instructions: Identify the premises and conclusions in the following arguments, and identify any premise and conclusion indicators. (4) English is the best language since it s the only one that I speak. (5) Bob likes to argue all the time, and for that reason he would make a good lawyer. (6) In view of the fact that Joe cheated on his taxes, we consequently cannot appoint him to the ethics committee. Instructions: Diagram the following arguments. First number each statement, then use plus signs and arrows to designate the argument structure as either a joint inference or an independent inference. (7) Joe has no friends since the only people he knows are on Facebook, and those aren t real friends. (8) Bob was voted most popular student in class, and Bob is always seen with lots of people around him. Thus, Bob has many friends. (9) Joe and Bob aren t friends because each says that he can t stand the other, and each angrily insults the other when they pass in the hall. Premise Indicators Since For Because Given that For the reason that In view of the fact that Conclusion Indicators Therefore Thus Hence So Accordingly For this reason Consequently It follows that Argument Diagrams Joint inference: Independent inference: 1 3 and 2 3

3 Instructions: In each of the following identify the logical connective being used and translate the proposition into standard form. (15) Father Joe s marriage to Beth implies that he first leaves the priesthood. (16) I was accepted at Yale University, but I d much rather attend Thrift Community College. (17) Bob s name does not appear on Santa s nice list. Instructions: Determine which of the following are well-formed nested propositions. (18) if P then (Q or R) (19) (P and Q) not (20) not (P or Q) (21) P and (if Q then R) Conditional: if P then Q Negation: not P Conjunction Clue Words ( And ) P, but Q P, although Q P; Q P, besides Q P, however Q P, whereas Q Conditional Clue Words ( If- Then ) If P, it follows that Q P implies Q P entails Q Whenever P, Q P, therefore Q Q follows from P Q, since P Logical Connectives Conjunction: P and Q Disjunction: P or Q

4 Instructions: Translate the following premises and conclusions into standard form and decide which valid argument form or fallacious argument form is being used. (22) If the band Satan s Pitchfork performs in town, they will play Hell, Sweet Hell. If they perform Hell, Sweet Hell then dudes will stage dive. Therefore, if they perform, dudes will stage dive. (23) Either Bob will go bankrupt, or I will. Bob will go bankrupt. Therefore, I will not. (24) If Joe flunks out of college, then his brother Bob will inherit the family business. Joe will not flunk out of college. Therefore, Bob will not inherit the family business. Instructions: Make up a valid argument that leads to the conclusion given. Use the rule indicated in parentheses. You will need to invent some simple proposition to make your premises complete. (25) Polly wants a cracker. (disjunctive syllogism) (26) If you insult Beth s mother, you will go to the hospital. (hypothetical syllogism) (27) Joe will fail his exam. (modus ponens) (28) Thrift Community College is a good school. (modus tollens) Modus Ponens premise (2) P concl. (3) Therefore, Q Modus Tollens premise (2) Not Q concl. (3) Therefore, not P Disjunctive Syllogism (two versions) premise (1) P or Q premise (2) not P concl. (3) therefore, Q Hypothetical Syllogism premise (1) if P then Q premise (2) if Q then R concl. (3) Therefore, if P then R

5 Instructions: Are the following arguments valid, invalid, sound, or unsound? (29) If Fido is a Dalmatian, then Fido would have lots of spots It is not the case that Fido is a Dalmatian Therefore, it is not the case that Fido has lots of spots (30) If Joseph Stalin had U.S. citizenship, then he would have been born in the U.S. It is not the case that Joseph Stalin was born in the U.S. Therefore, it is not the case that Joseph Stalin had U.S. citizenship. Instructions: The following test your understanding of soundness. (31) Can a valid argument have a false conclusion? (32) Can a sound argument have a false conclusion? Modus Ponens premise (2) P concl. (3) Therefore, Q Modus Tollens premise (2) Not Q concl. (3) Therefore, not P Disjunctive Syllogism (two versions) premise (1) P or Q premise (2) not P concl. (3) therefore, Q Hypothetical Syllogism premise (1) if P then Q premise (2) if Q then R concl. (3) Therefore, if P then R

6 Instructions: What is the inductive strength of each of the following (that is, very strong, strong, weak, very weak)? (33) Some notable guitarist have died in their 20s. Joe is a notable guitarist. Therefore, Joe will probably die in his 20s. (34) College dropouts make \$1 million less during their careers than college graduates. Joe is a college dropout. Therefore, Joe will probably make around \$1 million less during his career than an average college graduate. (35) College students with seven or more body piercings have a significantly higher rate of deviant behavior than students with no piercings. Joe has only one body piercing. Therefore Joe has only a slightly higher rate of deviant behavior than students with no piercings. Inductive Probability Inductively very strong: probability is close to certain. Inductively strong: probability is high. Inductively weak: probability is low. Inductively very weak: probability is close to non-existent.

7 Instructions: For each of the following, indicate the inductive argument form that is followed, and whether it commits any inductive fallacy. (36) Joe and Bob live in the same town, listen to the same music, and like the same sports teams. Joe is Presbyterian. Therefore, Bob is probably also Presbyterian. (37) 60% of college students in the U.S. are women. Preppy State University is a U.S. College. Therefore, there is a very high probability that the next student who walks out of Preppy State s student center will be a woman. (38) 100% of 20 randomly surveyed adults in the small town of Hornbeak, Tennessee shop at Walmart. Therefore, 100% of Americans shop at Walmart. Statistical syllogism: drawing a conclusion about an individual based on the population as a whole. premise (1) n percentage of a population has attribute A. premise (2) x is a member of that population. concl. (3) Therefore, there is an n percent probability that x has A. Fallacy of small proportion: a conclusion is too strong to be supported by the small population proportion with the attribute. Statistical induction: drawing a conclusion about a population based on a sample. premise (1) n percent of a sample has attribute A. concl. (2) Therefore, n percent of a population probably has attribute A. Fallacy of small sample: a conclusion is too strong to be supported by a small sample number. Fallacy of biased sample: a conclusion is too strong to be supported by a nonrandom sampling technique. Argument from Analogy: drawing a conclusion about one individual based on its similarities with another individual. premise (1) Objects x and y each have attributes A, B and C. premise (2) Object x has an additional attribute D. concl. (3) Therefore, object y probably also has attribute D. Fallacy of false analogy: comparing two items that have trivial points in common, but differ from each other in more significant ways.

### PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Introduction PHI 244 Welcome to PHI 244, About Stephen Texts Course Requirements Syllabus Points of Interest Website http://seschmid.org, http://seschmid.org/teaching Email Policy 1 2 Argument Worksheet

What is an argument? PHIL 110 Lecture on Chapter 3 of How to think about weird things An argument is a collection of two or more claims, one of which is the conclusion and the rest of which are the premises.

### ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

ARGUMENTS Arguments arguments 1 Argument Worksheet 1. An argument is a collection of propositions with one proposition, the conclusion, following from the other propositions, the premises. Inference is

### Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 1 - Course Introduction: 1. What is Philosophy? 2. What is Ethics? 3. Logic a. Truth b. Arguments c. Validity d. Soundness What is Philosophy? The Three Fundamental Questions

### Revisiting the Socrates Example

Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Building Arguments for Quantified

### There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds

### Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does

### Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Why Study Philosophy? Defining Philosophy Studying philosophy in a serious and reflective way will change you as a person Philosophy Is

### 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

I. LOGIC AND ARGUMENTATION 1 A. LOGIC 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. 3. It doesn t attempt to determine how people in fact reason. 4.

### Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase

### PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Session 3 September 9 th, 2015 All About Arguments (Part II) 1 A common theme linking many fallacies is that they make unwarranted assumptions. An assumption is a claim

### HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

### A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around

### PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ Critical Thinking: Quiz 4 Chapter Three: Argument Evaluation Section I. Indicate whether the following claims (1-10) are either true (A) or false (B). 1. If an arguer precedes

### CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument General Overview: As our students often attest, we all live in a complex world filled with demanding issues and bewildering challenges. In order to determine those

### PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1 W# Section (10 or 11) 1. True or False (5 points) Directions: Circle the letter next to the best answer. 1. T F All true statements are valid. 2. T

### Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Spring 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premisses. 2. A conclusion is a statement of support. 3. An easy way to determine

### Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Study Guides Chapter 1 - Basic Training Argument: A group of propositions is an argument when one or more of the propositions in the group is/are used to give evidence (or if you like, reasons, or grounds)

### Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 6, September 26, 2017 Entailment 1/55 Learning goals Semantic entailment Define semantic entailment. Explain subtleties of semantic entailment.

### Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems Prof. Deepak Khemani Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module 02 Lecture - 03 So in the last

### Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Fall 2015 True or False True = A, False = B 1. The inclusive "or" means "A or B or both A and B." 2. The conclusion contains both the major term and the middle term. 3. "If, then" statements

### HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

1 HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Argument Recognition 2 II. Argument Analysis 3 1. Identify Important Ideas 3 2. Identify Argumentative Role of These Ideas 4 3. Identify Inferences 5 4. Reconstruct the

### Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,

### Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University 2012 CONTENTS Part I Critical Thinking Chapter 1 Basic Training 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Logic, Propositions and Arguments 1.3 Deduction and Induction

### Criticizing Arguments

Kareem Khalifa Criticizing Arguments 1 Criticizing Arguments Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Written August, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Step 1: Initial Evaluation

### Logical (formal) fallacies

Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy

### Philosophical Arguments

Philosophical Arguments An introduction to logic and philosophical reasoning. Nathan D. Smith, PhD. Houston Community College Nathan D. Smith. Some rights reserved You are free to copy this book, to distribute

### Those who doubt the writing is from the autistic children themselves, lack compassion, and should stay the hell out of our lives!

Those who doubt the writing is from the autistic children themselves, lack compassion, and should stay the hell out of our lives! Ad misericordiam (appeal to pity) So many people have communicated with

### Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111) Neils Bohr (1885 1962) to Einstein: You are not thinking. You are merely being logical. Reason is one of the four ways of knowing: Perception Language Emotion

### 14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Demonstrate the importance of ethics as part of the persuasion process. 2. Identify and provide examples of eight common

### The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

BASIC ARGUMENTATION Alfred Snider, University of Vermont World Schools Debate Academy, Slovenia, 2015 Induction, deduction, causation, fallacies INDUCTION Definition: studying a sufficient number of analogous

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Developed by Jamie A. Hughes, South Campus Learning Center, Communications Lab 04-25-05 Permission to copy and use is granted to all FCCJ staff provided this

### The Philosopher s World Cup

The Philosopher s World Cup Monty Python & the Flying Circus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vv3qgagck&feature=related What is an argument? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqfkti6gn9y What is an argument?

### CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

CRITICAL THINKING FAULTY REASONING (VAUGHN CH. 5) LECTURE PROFESSOR JULIE YOO Formal v Informal Fallacies Irrelevant Premises Genetic Fallacy Composition Division Appeal to the Person (ad hominem/tu quoque)

### Galen A. Foresman, Peter S. Fosl, and Jamie Carlin Watson CRITICAL THINKING

The Galen A. Foresman, Peter S. Fosl, and Jamie Carlin Watson CRITICAL THINKING THE CRITICAL THINKING TOOLKIT GALEN A. FORESMAN, PETER S. FOSL, AND JAMIE C. WATSON THE CRITICAL THINKING TOOLKIT This

### Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous

### Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Logic Book Part 1 by Skylar Ruloff Contents Introduction 3 I Validity and Soundness 4 II Argument Forms 10 III Counterexamples and Categorical Statements 15 IV Strength and Cogency 21 2 Introduction This

### Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments Logic teaches us to develop a system of methods and principles to use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others to guide us in constructing arguments

### PHIL 115: Philosophical Anthropology. I. Propositional Forms (in Stoic Logic) Lecture #4: Stoic Logic

HIL 115: hilosophical Anthropology Lecture #4: Stoic Logic Arguments from the Euthyphro: Meletus Argument (according to Socrates) [3a-b] Argument: Socrates is a maker of gods; so, Socrates corrupts the

### Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I

Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON COLLEGE, PUNE (AUTONOMOUS) SYLLABUS UNDER AUTONOMY FIRST YEAR B.A. LOGIC SEMESTER I Academic Year 2016-2017 Department: PHILOSOPHY Deccan Education Society s FERGUSSON

### MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC FOR PRIVATE REGISTRATION TO BA PHILOSOPHY PROGRAMME 1. Logic is the science of-----------. A) Thought B) Beauty C) Mind D) Goodness 2. Aesthetics is the science of ------------.

### LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

LOGIC Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations

### PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES

PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES LECTURE CONTENTS LECTURE 1: CLAIMS, EXPLAINATIONS AND ARGUMENTS LECTURE 2: CONDITIONS AND DEDUCTION LECTURE 3: MORE DEDUCTION LECTURE 4: MEANING

### Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident

### Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1)

UGRC 150 CRITICAL THINKING & PRACTICAL REASONING Session 10 INDUCTIVE REASONONING IN THE SCIENCES & EVERYDAY LIFE( PART 1) Lecturer: Dr. Mohammed Majeed, Dept. of Philosophy & Classics, UG Contact Information:

### Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument

### T. Parent. I shall explain these steps in turn. Let s consider the following passage to illustrate the process:

Reconstructing Arguments Argument reconstruction is where we take a written argument, and re-write it to make the logic of the argument as obvious as possible. I have broken down this task into six steps:

### 2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition Argumentative Fallacies The Logic of Writing and Debate from http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html

### Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics It is useful to think of an argument as a list of sentences.[1] The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises. Thus: (1) No professors

### Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

Logic, reasoning and fallacies and some puzzling Before we start Introductory Examples Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 16.3, 2016/11/21 12:58:26) Wednesday, November

### Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall Stetson University Chapter 8 - Sentential ruth ables and Argument orms 8.1 Introduction he truth-value of a given truth-functional compound proposition depends

### The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Critical Thinking Lecture Four October 5, 2012 Chapter 3 Deductive Argument Patterns Diagramming Arguments Deductive Argument Patterns - There are some common patterns shared by many deductive arguments

### The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.

### National Quali cations

H SPECIMEN S85/76/ National Qualications ONLY Philosophy Paper Date Not applicable Duration hour 5 minutes Total marks 50 SECTION ARGUMENTS IN ACTION 30 marks Attempt ALL questions. SECTION KNOWLEDGE AND

### Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning................... 3 1.1.1 Strong Syllogism......................... 3 1.1.2 Weak Syllogism.......................... 4 1.1.3 Transitivity

### Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?

Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction? We argue that, if deduction is taken to at least include classical logic (CL, henceforth), justifying CL - and thus deduction

### Philosophy of Love, Sex, and Friendship WESTON. Arguments General Points. Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion.

WESTON 1 Arguments General Points Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to support one's view, to seek the meaning or justification for a position or belief,

### Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

A03.1 Introduction Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: With valid arguments, it is impossible to have a false conclusion if the premises are all true. Obviously valid arguments play a very important

### b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

Explanation for Question 1 in Quiz 8 by Norva Lo - Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 9:39 AM The following is the solution for Question 1 in Quiz 8: (a) Which term in the argument is being equivocated. (b) What

### Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic Standardizing and Diagramming In Reason and the Balance we have taken the approach of using a simple outline to standardize short arguments,

### Lecture 4: Deductive Validity

Lecture 4: Deductive Validity Right, I m told we can start. Hello everyone, and hello everyone on the podcast. This week we re going to do deductive validity. Last week we looked at all these things: have

### MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your

### Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).

Critical Thinking Exam 2: Chapter 3 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B). 1. Valid arguments never have

### Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments What You Will Learn Symbolic arguments Standard forms of arguments 3.5-2 Symbolic Arguments A symbolic argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. It is called

### Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms Consider Argument 1 and Argument 2, and select the option that correctly identifies the valid argument(s), if any. Argument 1 All bears are omnivores. All omnivores

### Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Fallacies in logic Hasty Generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). Stereotypes

### stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge What logic puts in order is the way we reason out. Logic makes explicit the rules of reasoning. Logical Inference Determining if an argument is valid or not is important, but

### The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination,

### Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i

Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle Identifying Arguments Dallas Baptist University Introduction Identifying Arguments i Any kid who has played with tinker toys and Lincoln logs knows that

### I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem

### Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise

### Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,

### Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness 1 Goals Today Introduce one of our central topics: validity and soundness, and its connection to one of our primary course goals, namely: learning how to evaluate arguments

### Full file at

Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Summary Chapter 1 introduces students to main issues and branches of philosophy. The chapter begins with a basic definition of philosophy. Philosophy is an activity, and addresses

Reading and Evaluating Arguments Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments To recognize errors in logical reasoning An argument

### Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments INB able of Contents Date opic Page # July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Examples 84 July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Notes 85 July 28, 2014 Section 3.6 Examples 86 July 28, 2014 Section

### PRIMER CHART 1_LOGICAL FALLACIES

1 Some Important Rules to Remember 1 THE FOUR PRIMARY LAWS/PRINCIPLES OF LOGIC a. THE LAW OF (NON-) CONTRADICTION: is the first of the primary principles of logic. It states A is not non-a, in other words,

### Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language

### accent, fallacy of accident, fallacy of accuracy act-deontology affirming the antecedent affirming the consequent ambiguous, ambiguity ampersand (&)

GLOSSARY accent, fallacy of Accent is one of several informal fallacies. In one form, it consists of placing an unusual stress on a word and drawing a conclusion on the basis of that stress. Example: Thou

### Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing

Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing Zendo The Master will present two Koans - one that follows the rule and one that does not. Teams will take turns presenting their own koans to the master to see if they

### Our Guide to Better Grades

Paper Feedback Presents: Our Guide to Better Grades Your entire university experience is centred on developing critical thinking skills. It s about utilising logical arguments in defence of a position

### HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by

### Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic)

Chapter 3: More Deductive Reasoning (Symbolic Logic) There's no easy way to say this, the material you're about to learn in this chapter can be pretty hard for some students. Other students, on the other

### I. What is an Argument?

I. What is an Argument? In philosophy, an argument is not a dispute or debate, but rather a structured defense of a claim (statement, assertion) about some topic. When making an argument, one does not

### Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider

### Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz Please take out a few pieces of paper and a pen or pencil. Write your name, the date, your class period, and a title at the top of the

### The Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay but what is the difference between an argument and a quarrel? Academic argumentation is based on logical, structured evidence that attempts the reader to accept an opinion, take

### Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

CRITICAL THINKING Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan LECTURE 4! Nondeductive Success: Statistical Syllogism, Inductive Generalization, Analogical Argument Summary In this week

### Reductionism in Fallacy Theory

Reductionism in Fallacy Theory Christoph Lumer (Appeared in: Argumentation 14 (2000). Pp. 405-423.) ABSTRACT: (1) The aim of the paper is to develop a reduction of fallacy theory, i.e. to "deduce" fallacy

### Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Fallacies 1. Hasty generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or too small). Stereotypes about

### Logic & Fallacies. An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition".

Introduction Logic & Fallacies There's a lot of debate on the net. Unfortunately, much of it is of very low quality. The aim of this document is to explain the basics of logical reasoning, and hopefully

### Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

by SALVATORE - 5 September 2009, 10:44 PM I`m having difficulty understanding what steps to take in applying valid argument forms to do a proof. What determines which given premises one should select to

### I. Subject-verb agreement (393-4), parallelism (402), and mixed construction (418-19).

English 1100 Fall 2013 Thesis to Argument I. Subject-verb agreement (393-4), parallelism (402), and mixed construction (418-19). You have come to a conclusion/thesis through narrowing the topic down, forming

### Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments 1 Agenda 1. What is an Argument? 2. Evaluating Arguments 3. Validity 4. Soundness 5. Persuasive Arguments 6.

### GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

PRACTICAL LOGIC Bryan Rennie GENERAL NOTES ON THE CLASS EXPLANATION OF GRADES AND POINTS, ETC. SAMPLE QUIZZES SCHEDULE OF CLASSES THE SIX RULES OF SYLLOGISMS (and corresponding fallacies) SYMBOLS USED

### 3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA Ms. Hargen PROPAGANDA Persuasion that deliberately discourages people from thinking for themselves. It relies on one-sided or distorted arguments. HASTY GENERALIZATION

### 24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation

24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation An argument in logic is not a quarrel or dispute; instead, it is a list of sentences. 1 The last sentence is the conclusion, and the other sentences are the premises.

### HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

What does it mean to provide an argument for a statement? To provide an argument for a statement is an activity we carry out both in our everyday lives and within the sciences. We provide arguments for