ARTICLE 9: WHAT IS IT, WHERE DOES IT COME FROM, AND DO WE NEED IT (ANYMORE)?
|
|
- Darleen Hart
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 ARTICLE 9: WHAT IS IT, WHERE DOES IT COME FROM, AND DO WE NEED IT (ANYMORE)? WHAT IS ARTICLE 9? 1. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the fifty eight Member States of the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, defines freedom of religion and belief as follows: "Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance." (Article 18). 2. Article 9 (1) ECHR reflects this provision and provides: Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance. (emphasis added) 3. It is important to note its nature as a qualified right, that is to say one where action interfering with the exercise of the right is authorised but only where it can be justified. Accordingly, Article 9(2) provides that the freedom to manifest one s religion or beliefs can be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. 4. It will at once be noticed that what is protected here is not the private realm alone. It is not simply the freedom to believe what you like that is protected, but rather the freedom to manifest that belief that is, for practical purposes, at the centre of right. Why that should be so on matters which are essentially matters of conscience, is a subject to which I return at the conclusion of the talk. 5. Second, it is not only religion proper, but any number of beliefs which potentially fall within what is evidently broader than even the broadest church. INTRODUCTION AND OUTLINE 6. I hope that this talk represents a provocative look at some of the cases and broader issues on this topic. My purpose is not to state a particular position, but to sketch in some of the more unusual aspects of this article and to stimulate debate about how easily or otherwise it fits in with what may be expected of human rights law in our increasingly secular country (see Appendix I). I do so from a sceptic s point of view in order to illuminate these
2 2 features of the law which currently appears to want simultaneously to take Article 9 seriously and also to ignore it whenever convenient. 7. In July 2005, Lord Justice Mummery, with some acuity, observed in his judgment in Copsey (Stephen) v WWB Devon Clays Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 932 at [3] Until recently there has been considerably less activity in the English courts and tribunals about Article 9 than about the Convention Articles relating to the right to life, to a fair trial, to private life and to freedom of expression. It is probably only a matter of time, however, before the fundamental and pervasive character of Article 9 will be more fully revealed. If the Article means what it says, it has the potential to be far reaching in its legal, social, economic and political effects. 8. Since then there has been a considerable number of cases in the higher courts involving Article 9. At a time when human rights litigation is under some scrutiny for having introduced a culture of complaint over matters not of central importance to the maintenance of human dignity, some might think much of the litigation under Article 9 has a particularly absurd ring to it. a. On issues which potentially affect millions of individuals, such as the lawfulness of being dismissed for refusing to work on your faith s holy day, the courts have reached a rather speedy conclusion that there is no interference with Article 9 rights. b. On the other hand, the legality of a decision of the Welsh authorities that a bullock who had tested positive for the infectious disease bovine tuberculosis should be slaughtered went to the Court of Appeal. c. Cases involving medical treatment of children against the religious views of their parents (most dramatically cases involving blood transfusions and Jehovah s Witnesses) are largely resolved by judges describing the importance of religious belief to the family concerned in grave terms and reciting the protection afforded to it in Article 9 in even more earnest tones and then proceeding to explain why after all the transfusion should take place. 9. There are, I suggest, two overall and contrasting themes which emerge form the case law. First, things which are genuinely disruptive of life in our predominantly secular society, such as work and the distribution of opportunities and resources (particularly public resources), are too important to be resolved by paying attention to religious belief however deeply held. Secondly, peripheral disputes, which make no particularly heavy demands on anyone but which can be presented as articles of faith for adherents have
3 3 enjoyed much more success and have frequently required the full majesty of the higher courts for resolution. On this basis I suggest that it is no accident that the area of individual clothing and the wearing of symbols, falling as it does into the latter category, has become quite such a fertile area of late. 10. This is not to say that the cases referred to above do not arrive at common sense answers (at least to the minds of many). The real question however is why they must do so by resorting to a sort of judicial lip service being paid to Article 9 (at best) or forensic sleight of hand (at worst). The answer lies in the elevation of the protection for the manifestation of religious belief to the pantheon of those civil and political rights protected by law which brings about these problems because of the inevitably wide application of such a provision. The fact that few in the judiciary seem prepared to apply the protection too extensively is perhaps a sign that there is something fundamentally at odds in its inclusion among a generally uncontroversial list of entitlements. We can see traces of this theme in the jurisprudence under Article It does not take any great feat of imagination to see that protection for the manifestation of religious beliefs on the basis that such things are fundamentally worthy of protection for their own sake (as belief systems) rapidly brings the potential for conflict with the obligation to secure the protection of other convention rights (e.g. freedom of speech, antidiscrimination etc.). WHERE DID ARTICLE 9 COME FROM? 12. By this I mean asking the question why was it included in the Convention at all? Here we are back to the fact the Convention was, in part, an instrument for the prevention in Europe of the genocide that had characterised Hitler s Germany and which had religious discrimination and hatred on a grand state sponsored scale at the heart of the political project. It is not hard to see why those framing the convention sought to include the practice of religious belief as a protected activity. Equally however, and given the problems which I will be suggesting it presents, could it not be said that there is no comparable and specific social imperative today for the constitutional protection of religion? HOW WELL DOES ARTICLE 9 PROTECT RELIGIOUS AND OTHER BELIEFS? 13. The absolute freedom privately to hold particular religious or philosophical views gives rise to few practical difficulties. Litigation chiefly concerns the legality of alleged limitations on manifestations of religious belief. In such litigation, there are four stages, which are essentially control mechanisms, for disposing of cases which are not worthy of the protection of Article 9:
4 4 a. Beliefs Do the beliefs of the Claimant come within article 9? b. Manifestation Is the activity that is the subject of the limitation properly understood to be a manifestation of such beliefs? c. Interference If the article 9 right to manifest one s religion or beliefs is not interfered with, then there is nothing to justify. d. Justification For interference to be justified under article 9(2), that interference must be prescribed by law, have one of the legitimate aims set out in the article, and be proportionate to that legitimate aim. I. Religion or belief 14. There are inherent difficulties with protecting people s beliefs. That is because some people will believe anything. The law therefore has to develop specific tools to weed out those beliefs that in contrast to some religious beliefs which are regarded as rational, are not seen as worthy of protection at all. 15. The House of Lords has recently stressed the importance of giving the benefit of the doubt to the Claimant in this area to avoid the problem of subjective interpretation. In R (Williamson) v SS Education and Employment [2005] 2 AC 246, Christian parents who accepted certain biblical prescriptions concerning corporal punishment of children challenging legislation banning the administration of corporal punishment in independent schools, as a violation of art 9 rights. Lord Nicholls at [23] and [24] set out the requirements for a belief to come within article 9: a. The belief must not be trivial. b. The belief must be consistent with basic standards of human dignity or integrity. c. The belief must also be coherent in the sense of being intelligible and capable of being understood. But, again, too much should not be demanded in this regard. Typically, religion involves belief in the supernatural. It is not always susceptible to lucid exposition or, still less, rational justification. The language used is often the language of allegory, symbol and metaphor. Depending on the subject matter, individuals cannot always be expected to express themselves with cogency or precision. This position is a clear reference to, and relaxation of, the Strasbourg view of what amounted to beliefs in Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom 4 EHRR 293 at [36], namely beliefs that attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance.
5 5 d. The belief does not have to be religious. The atheist, the agnostic, and the sceptic are as much entitled to freedom to hold and manifest their beliefs as the theist. But for its manifestation to be protected by article 9 a non-religious belief must relate to an aspect of human life or behaviour of comparable importance to that normally found with religious beliefs. It is mot immediately obvious what might be included in this category at all. 16. Beliefs for the purposes of article 9 have been held to include: a. Pacifism, as in Arrowsmith v UK 19 DR 5 (1980); b. A belief that the appropriate framework for sexual relations is within marriage" P (R on the application of) v Governors Millais School [2007] EWHC 1698 (Admin); c. A belief that as part of their proper upbringing, when necessary children should be subject to corporal punishment at home and at school, Williamson per Lord Nicholls at [35]. It might legitimately be asked in relation to this point what this adds to the moral quality of the act in question (corporal punishment). Does the fact that it is administered as part of a belief system present us with an extra reason for allowing it? 17. One of the few examples of an asserted belief being deemed outside article 9 was Countryside Alliance and Anor (R on the application of) v Her Majesty's Attorney General & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 817, where CA rejected a challenge to the ban on hunting inter alia on the ground that it was an unjustified interference with the manifestation of the hunters beliefs. II. Manifestation [Counsel] say submitted that hunting is at the very core of mankind's psyche and those who exercise their conscience to follow a way of life embracing that psyche subscribe to a belief that is at least of comparable importance to that of a religious belief: to many it is of greater importance. We do not consider that this ingenious argument would find favour with the court at Strasbourg, which has referred to the main purpose of hunting in the present day as providing pleasure and relaxation for those who take part in it while respecting its traditions... [at 177] 18. In Williamson at [35] Lord Nicholls held that when parents administer corporal punishment to their children in accordance with these beliefs they are manifesting these belief (a conclusion which gets no less startling the more times you read it). His reasoning on what amounted to a manifestation was as follows.
6 6 a. Not all acts motivated by a religion or belief are manifestations of that belief. As a pacifist Miss Arrowsmith distributed leaflets to soldiers, urging them to decline service in Northern Ireland. But the contents of the leaflets did not express pacifist views, nor did the act of distributing the leaflets do so. She was not thereby manifesting her pacifism: Arrowsmith v United Kingdom 3 EHRR 218. Now, it is possible to discern the reason why it was not thought desirable to extend the protection of the ECHR to the claimant in Arrowsmith, but again, the means of doing so, is at first sight odd; we are being told that urging others not to fight as part of an army is not a manifestation of pacifism. It is clear I suggest that this is a useful judicial tool for limiting the scope of Article 9 but its basis in logic, when judged by reference to its results, is more difficult to discern. b. To be a manifestation, the act must be intimately connected to the belief. Again, the House of Lords emphasised the subjectivity of this question: consideration must be given to what the claimant believes he or she is obliged to do as a consequence of their belief. 1 If the belief takes the form of a perceived obligation to act in a specific way, then, in principle, doing that act pursuant to that belief is itself a manifestation of that belief in practice. c. Somewhat reassuringly, only manifestations consistent with basic standards of human dignity or integrity are to be protected under Article 9; therefore a manifestation of a belief which involved torture to others would not qualify for protection. The fact that this caveat has to be introduced at all may be said to be a clue that there is something different about Article Examples of where an activity has not been found to be a manifestation of a belief include: a. P (R on the application of) v Governors Millais School [2007] EWHC 1698 (Admin) it was held that a schoolgirl was under no obligation, by reason of her belief in no sex before marriage, to wear a Silver Ring Thing purity ring to school, as she herself conceded. In contrast, two Sikh girls were allowed to wear a Kara bangle by the school where it was considered by them to be a requirement of their faith. Hereabouts in the law we are here dancing on the head of a pin. b. X and Church of Scientology v Sweden (1979) 16 DR 68, an advertisement by the Church of Scientology for the E-meter, which 1 For example, there are many different views on whether it is necessary for religious adherents to wear particular head coverings.
7 7 was claimed to measure the electrical characteristics of the static field surrounding the body. III. Interference 20. The approach of the courts has been much stricter in respect of what constitutes interference with the manifestation of a right. This approach largely derives from Strasbourg authorities on employment and other professional situations. In judging what is a material interference, the ECt HR has had regard to limitations which the complainant has voluntarily accepted. Thus in Stedman v. United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHHR CD168 the applicant was dismissed for her refusal to work for her private sector employer on Sunday. It was held that there was no interference with her ability to manifest her religious beliefs, because she had voluntarily accepted the job. Similarly, in Copsey (Stephen) v WWB Devon Clays Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 932, the Claimant contested his dismissal by Devon Clays when he refused to accept their requirement that he should agree to work on Sundays if needed. Mummery LJ noted in the absence of the Commission rulings, I would have regarded this as a case of material interference with Mr Copsey's Article 9 rights, but followed Strasbourg in deciding it was not. What the Court of Appeal has highlighted is that in this respect Article 9 does not appear to have enough teeth to ensure a culture of compliance with religious obligations in very important areas of life and where the plea for the freedom to observe religious ritual is genuine. 21. The courts have extended this reasoning more contentiously into the highly politicised area of religious dress in schools. In R (Begum) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, a majority of the House of Lords found that there was no interference with Art 9 in a situation where a person voluntarily accepted a place at a school with knowledge of their uniform policy that did not permit the wearing of a jilbab, where could have chosen to attend another school where the jilbab was permitted. Only Baroness Hale dissented, finding that it was an interference, not least because in reality parents imposed a choice of school on their children. 22. In short, the current approach [as recently applied in R (on the application of X) v Y School [2007] EWHC 298 (Admin), concerning a school s prohibition against wearing the niqab veil] is: a. Article 9 does not require that one should be allowed to manifest one's religion at any time and place of one's own choosing;
8 8 b. there is no interference with an article 9 right where there is an alternative place at which the services in question can be provided without the objectionable rule in question. IV. Justification 23. Such is the height of the hurdle of interference (and, to a lesser extent, manifestation), that relatively few cases on Article 9 are actually decided on the point of justification. It is some indication of the somewhat incongruous state of the case law on Article 9 that one such case is Surayananda (R on the Application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2007] EWCA Civ 893. This case concerned Shambo, a bullock owned by the Community of the Many Names of God. Preservation of life is a fundamental tenet of the Community's beliefs, and the Court of Appeal noted his slaughter would be comparable, in the Community's view, to the killing of a human being. Unfortunately, Shambo tested positive for bovine tuberculosis [34], one of the most difficult animal health problems that the farming industry faces in GB today, and the Welsh authorities ordered that he be slaughtered. It is perhaps not surprising (especially in the light of recent calamities to British livestock) that the Court of Appeal concluded that having regard to the very considerable problems presented by bovine TB, the decision to eliminate the risk presented by the bullock by slaughter, and not to permit an exemption, was justified. 2 [Further example: In Connolly v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 237 (Admin), a Catholic woman challenged her prosecution for sending photographs of aborted foetuses under the Malicious Communications Act 1988, as being material of a grossly offensive nature, on article 9 and 10 grounds. No violation of article 9 was held, her conviction being necessary in a democratic society, her right to express her views about abortion not justifying the distress and anxiety that she intended to cause those who received the photographs.] V. An ambivalent approach? 24. In terms of the control mechanisms then, the courts take a rather ambivalent approach. On the one hand that there is an increasingly generous approach to whether beliefs, and the manifestation thereof, come within article 9, but on 2 What is surprising was that the applicants had been successful in gaining a quashing order at first instance on the basis that the Welsh authorities had not engaged in a balancing exercise between the public health justification and article 9 rights. The Court of Appeal overturned this, following Begum that Article 9 complaints are about substance not procedure: any lack of consideration of article 9 rights in a decision-making process does not per se render a decision in breach of article 9.
9 9 the other hand this is offset by the maintenance of a quite restrictive approach to the question of interference, such that only rarely do decisions come down to the issue of justification. The courts therefore choose to achieve the same results (i.e. no breach of Article 9) by the use only of the last control mechanism. The result is therefore an inclusive approach to what counts as belief thereby reducing the scope for rulings which may offend those holding certain beliefs of an unusual nature coupled with a robustly pragmatic refusal to let any of it make any difference. 25. However, if we are to take Article 9 at its word, then this surely is the wrong way around. There must be a value judgment as to what is worthy of protection. If something is a belief for the purposes of Article 9 then it ought to be protected in the same way as any other. To do so is to give Article 9 the scope and force of other comparable Convention rights. That this is legally the right answer seems to me to be clear. It is far less clear whether this sort of approach would be politically and socially acceptable (and indeed many reasons to suppose that it would not). LEGAL PROTECTION FOR RELIGION AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF OUTSIDE ARTICLE The case law cited above shows that the law has in general sought to steer a careful path in delimiting the degree of protection which human rights law provides for religion and belief. It has done so through applying restrictive meanings to many of the core concepts contained in Article 9. However, the legal protection of religion has not stood still and outside the context of Article 9 there has been a willingness to extend statutory protection to religious communities which some may find surprising. In these respects the jurisprudence under Article 9 has not kept pace with the degree of willingness to extend the legal protection of religion. 27. I take two examples of statutory intervention in this area. 28. The first example is the Religious and Racial Hatred Act 2006 (amending the Public Order Act 1986)(Appendix II). This piece of legislation was introduced (after two previous failed attempts) to place a specific offence on the statute book such that A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred is guilty of an offence. The offence may be committed in a public or a private place. As a result of a great deal of pressure at the time the scope of the offence was amended (to insert a requirement of intention as an ingredient of the offence) and there is also a wide ranging exemption clause which provides:
10 10 Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system. (section 29J) 29. The second is the Equality Act 2006 which Jeremy Hyam will be dealing with in his talk. The broad point is however that the Government (and Parliament) has embraced the idea that there should be an express exemption from the UK s law against religious discrimination on grounds of religious belief for faith schools. Why the education of the young in separate religious schools should be thought to present such a compelling a case for an exemption from the principle of equality of access to educational opportunities is a deeply controversial issue but one which brings into sharp focus debates about the conflict between equality and protection for religion. 30. But there are other shifts in favour of protection of religion or at least religious sensibility, which occur at a level below legislation, in the cut and thrust of public debate generally and in the political process of passing legislation through Parliament. I give two examples. 31. First, the position of the Catholic Church in running adoption agencies. Here pleas were made at the highest level for Catholic adoption agencies to be able to continue to discriminate against gay people in the placing of children for adoption on the basis that to require them not to discriminate was an affront to religious freedom 3. The government was initially sympathetic 4 but later insisted that the law it had passed giving gay people the right to receive services without discrimination should be applied to Catholics too. 32. The only question here is why this was ever an issue in the first place. If you are a government that believes (as this one says it is) that discrimination is a social evil which denies people their fair share of resources, opportunities and entitlements and that the practice of discrimination offends the principle that people must be treated equally then it is at first sight difficult to see why the imposition of discriminatory practices and disadvantages is made more palatable by being founded on hundreds of years of religious doctrine or conscience. 3 The Archbishops of Canterbury and York joined a call made by Cardinal Murphy-O Connor to the effect that rights of conscience cannot be made subject to legislation, however well-meaning. 4 At least, the Communities Secretary Ruth Kelly was known to be in favour of an exemption.
11 The second example takes a now, apparently, historical example of the UK government s attitude to the conflict between freedom of speech and religion. Until very recently, the received wisdom in this country, and certainly among the liberal political class, was that freedom of speech and perhaps particularly freedom of political speech is at the heart of what it means to live in a democracy. This means that giving offence and heaping opprobrium of all kinds upon those with whom you have fundamental disagreement is simply par for the course. It does not require any, let alone some special, justification. You can by this means bring almost any institution into question, even religion. The quality of the debate does not have to be high, it does not have be couched in the language of the broadsheets or the university seminar room, it is enough that you are espousing your views. You do not have to stick to poking fun ; you can be viciously satirical. 34. This position was tested during the Salman Rushdie affair. In the eighties, the Booker prize winning British author provoked a world-wide outcry with the publication of The Satanic Verses. The novel was said to have been gravely offensive to Muslims. This led to scenes of his book (and worse his effigy) being burned in the streets and then to a formal fatwa being issued by the then theocratic leader of Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini. The issue became a cause celebre for the liberal establishment here and abroad. The book burning was condemned while the book itself became an international best seller. The affair was notable for a number of reasons, not least the fact that very few (one is tempted to say almost none) of the demonstrators had read the book and had thus been in a position to be personally offended by its contents. But the reaction from the British government and from the liberal establishment was one of outrage against the application of an intolerant set of religious beliefs to the work of a novelist whose freedom to rock the boat was seen as central to the lifeblood of democratic culture. 35. Contrast this position with that which followed the publication in Denmark, in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, of several cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed. This affair again provoked an international outcry. This time it occurred several months after the publication and largely, it seems, was stoked up by a number of radical clerics in whose interests it was to stir up antiwestern feeling in the middle east. People died and many were injured in the ensuing unrest. It is difficult to know how many of these people had seen the actual cartoons themselves and, if they did, whether they were genuinely offended by them but their number may not have been that much greater than the readership of the Satanic Verses. There were protests in this country, including those outside the BBC where small number of radical muslims held placards proclaiming death as the appropriate sanction for those responsible for showing the pictures on the TV.
12 This time the response of the then Home Secretary and former radical student politician, Jack Straw was that publication of provocative cartoons was something to be deprecated as being needlessly insensitive to the feelings of a religious minority and to be condemned on those grounds 5. This was coupled with a public statement commending those newspaper and TV editors who had adopted a practice of self censorship in not showing the images. For those who were looking for it, this was a disappointing defence of the long tradition of mocking political cartoons which has characterised many of our newspapers throughout the 20 th century and before. More importantly it was a sign of the increased weight to be accorded to religious views and sensibilities in public debate at the highest levels of our public life. 37. It will be interesting to see if this increased tolerance of religious difference, even where it apparently transgresses other deeply held principles, will find its way even more emphatically into legislation beyond the human rights sphere, such as employment and education. 38. But there must in my view be a very real question of whether there is a need for this sort of legal protection at all. It is difficult to see a clear case for protecting the manifestation of religious belief beyond the private sphere and in the public sphere beyond anti-discrimination law (i.e. do not discriminate against people on religious grounds when it comes to the provision of opportunities for employment and the provisions of goods and services) and the already existing prohibitions of the criminal law. 39. Such a state of affairs would send a signal that in most circumstances political society was not interested in regulating the freedom of individuals to carry on their private religious or other beliefs but that neither was it inclined to bestow special public protection on them. It is far from clear that such a state of affairs would present any real obstacles to the maintenance (and indeed flourishing) of strong faith communities and commitments generally and would maintain a comparable level of personal freedom to follow one s chosen path of belief in religion to that which is presently the case. 5 It is interesting to note that the publication of such cartoons would not, it appears, have raised any problems under Article 9. See Green (R on the application of) v City Of Westminster Magistrates Court [2007] EWHC 2785 (Admin). This cases concerned the desire of the Applicant to bring a private prosecution for the ancient offence of blasphemous libel against BBC for broadcasting 'Jerry Springer: the Opera'. The claim was not raised on human rights grounds and rightly so, in view of Lord Justice Hughes (obiter) Whilst the law of blasphemy may well be 'consonant' with the right to freedom of thought and to manifest one's religion enshrined in Article 9 see Wingrove v UK (1996) 24 EHRR 1 at para 48, it does not seem to us that insulting a man's religious beliefs, deeply held though they are likely to be, will normally amount to an infringement of his Article 9 rights since his right to hold to and to practise his religion is generally unaffected by such insults. The conduct complained of therefore was not even unlawful, at least on human rights grounds.
13 13 CONCLUSION 40. In conclusion, the recent case law on Article 9 reflects the rather contradictory impulses of being open-minded in regards to what constitutes a belief (and to a lesser extent its manifestation), and following Strasbourg in keeping the Pandora s box of article 9 essentially closed in areas such as employment and education which represent the most direct interaction between a person s faith and their daily life. Indeed, it could be said that it is precisely the potential breadth of article 9 that would seem to lead to the at times rather specious arguments as to why claims under it are rejected. 41. A final example of the refusal of courts to acknowledge the radical potential of Article 9 in matters relating to millions is Boughton & Ors (R on the application of) v HM Treasury [2006] EWCA Civ 504. Here, tax-paying pacifists objected to the fact that their tax was paid into a single fund that was used partly for military purposes. In rejecting the claim on the basis that the payment of tax into a separate fund would not be a manifestation of belief, Mummery LJ implicitly criticised the Strasbourg jurisprudence, before proceeding to follow it: They have taken what may be thought to be a rather strict or narrow line on the manifestation of religious and philosophical belief in a number of areas central to the daily life of the individual citizen in the modern state, such as employment, education and fiscal responsibilities. In some respects the reasoning may be legally and logically unsound. The same criticisms could be said to apply equally well to the current jurisprudence of the English courts. Owain Thomas* *I am indebted to Matthew Donmall, our newest tenant, for the background research for this paper. The debating points raised (provocative or otherwise) are mine and should not be held against him. Appendix I Some interesting statistics on declared religious belief: 2001 UK Census Those of no religion are the 2nd largest belief group, about 3 times as many as all the other (non-christian) religions altogether. 7,274,290 people said they had no religion - though only 10,357 specified that they were atheists.
14 14 Jedi Knights had 390,127 followers, and formed a larger group than several of the major religions : Jews (259, 927); Sikhs (329, 358); Buddhists (144,453); or minor religions such as Jainism (15,132), Zoroastrianism (3,738) or the Baha i faith (4,645). Office of National Statistics, British Social Attitudes, 2000 A survey of 3000 people in England, Scotland and Wales in 2000 found the proportion of people who say they belong to no religion has grown from 31% to 44%. ( British Social Attitudes Survey, National Centre for Social Research, Nov 2000) Appendix II The Racial and Religious Hatred Act A Meaning of religious hatred In this Part religious hatred means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief. Acts intended to stir up religious hatred 29B Use of words or behaviour or display of written material (1) A person who uses threatening words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred.
15 15 (2) An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the written material is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and are not heard or seen except by other persons in that or another dwelling. (3) A constable may arrest without warrant anyone he reasonably suspects is committing an offence under this section. (4) In proceedings for an offence under this section it is a defence for the accused to prove that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the written material displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling. (5) This section does not apply to words or behaviour used, or written material displayed, solely for the purpose of being included in a programme service. 29C Publishing or distributing written material (1) A person who publishes or distributes written material which is threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (2) References in this Part to the publication or distribution of written material are to its publication or distribution to the public or a section of the public. 29D Public performance of play (1) If a public performance of a play is given which involves the use of threatening words or behaviour, any person who presents or directs the performance is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (2) This section does not apply to a performance given solely or primarily for one or more of the following purposes (a) rehearsal, (b) making a recording of the performance, or (c) enabling the performance to be included in a programme service; but if it is proved that the performance was attended by persons other than those directly connected with the giving of the performance or the doing in relation to it of the things mentioned in paragraph (b) or (c), the performance shall, unless the contrary is shown, be taken not to have been given solely or primarily for the purpose mentioned above. (3) For the purposes of this section (a) a person shall not be treated as presenting a performance of a play by reason only of his taking part in it as a performer, (b) a person taking part as a performer in a performance directed by another shall be treated as a person who directed the performance if without reasonable excuse he performs otherwise than in accordance with that person s direction, and (c) a person shall be taken to have directed a performance of a play given under his direction notwithstanding that he was not present during the performance; and a person shall not be treated as aiding or abetting the commission of an offence under this section by reason only of his taking part in a performance as a performer.
16 16 (4) In this section play and public performance have the same meaning as in the Theatres Act (5) The following provisions of the Theatres Act 1968 apply in relation to an offence under this section as they apply to an offence under section 2 of that Act section 9 (script as evidence of what was performed), section 10 (power to make copies of script), section 15 (powers of entry and inspection). 29E Distributing, showing or playing a recording (1) A person who distributes, or shows or plays, a recording of visual images or sounds which are threatening is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (2) In this Part recording means any record from which visual images or sounds may, by any means, be reproduced; and references to the distribution, showing or playing of a recording are to its distribution, showing or playing to the public or a section of the public. (3) This section does not apply to the showing or playing of a recording solely for the purpose of enabling the recording to be included in a programme service. 29F Broadcasting or including programme in programme service (1) If a programme involving threatening visual images or sounds is included in a programme service, each of the persons mentioned in subsection (2) is guilty of an offence if he intends thereby to stir up religious hatred. (2) The persons are (a) the person providing the programme service, (b) any person by whom the programme is produced or directed, and (c) any person by whom offending words or behaviour are used. Inflammatory material 29G Possession of inflammatory material (1) A person who has in his possession written material which is threatening, or a recording of visual images or sounds which are threatening, with a view to (a) in the case of written material, its being displayed, published, distributed, or included in a programme service whether by himself or another, or (b) in the case of a recording, its being distributed, shown, played, or included in a programme service, whether by himself or another, is guilty of an offence if he intends religious hatred to be stirred up thereby.
17 17 (2) For this purpose regard shall be had to such display, publication, distribution, showing, playing, or inclusion in a programme service as he has, or it may reasonably be inferred that he has, in view. 29H Powers of entry and search (1) If in England and Wales a justice of the peace is satisfied by information on oath laid by a constable that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person has possession of written material or a recording in contravention of section 29G, the justice may issue a warrant under his hand authorising any constable to enter and search the premises where it is suspected the material or recording is situated. (2) If in Scotland a sheriff or justice of the peace is satisfied by evidence on oath that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person has possession of written material or a recording in contravention of section 29G, the sheriff or justice may issue a warrant authorising any constable to enter and search the premises where it is suspected the material or recording is situated. (3) A constable entering or searching premises in pursuance of a warrant issued under this section may use reasonable force if necessary. (4) In this section premises means any place and, in particular, includes (a) any vehicle, vessel, aircraft or hovercraft, (b) any offshore installation as defined in section 12 of the Mineral Workings (Offshore Installations) Act 1971, and (c) any tent or movable structure. 29J Protection of freedom of expression Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents, or proselytising or urging adherents of a different religion or belief system to cease practising their religion or belief system.
JUSTICE Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion
JUSTICE Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion Jodie Blackstock Senior Legal Officer, JUSTICE Article 9 ECHR 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes
More informationRELIGION OR BELIEF. Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team
RELIGION OR BELIEF Submission by the British Humanist Association to the Discrimination Law Review Team January 2006 The British Humanist Association (BHA) 1. The BHA is the principal organisation representing
More information1 The following is a submission to a consultation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (September
Submission to the Consultation on Legal Intervention on Religion or Belief Rights 1 Dr Russell Sandberg, Lecturer in Law, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University In relation to religious rights,
More informationSubmission from Atheist Ireland On the proposed amendment to Section 37 of the Employment Equality Act
Submission from Atheist Ireland On the proposed amendment to Section 37 of the Employment Equality Act 1998-2011 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Selective Nature of the Exemptions 3. Limited Opportunities
More informationWe have freedom in the UK to share the gospel with others.
Freedom of Speech Second edition, revised 2018 Key Facts We have freedom in the UK to share the gospel with others. It is lawful to preach the gospel and hand out Christian literature on the streets to
More informationIn defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech
In defence of the four freedoms : freedom of religion, conscience, association and speech Understanding religious freedom Religious freedom is a fundamental human right the expression of which is bound
More informationArticle 31 under Part 3 on Fundamental Rights and Duties of current draft Constitution provides for Right to Religious freedom:
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND www.ohchr.org TEL: +41 22 917 9359 / +41 22 917 9407 FAX: +41 22
More informationThis document consists of 10 printed pages.
Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level THINKING SKILLS 9694/43 Paper 4 Applied Reasoning MARK SCHEME imum Mark: 50 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid
More informationDeclaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief Proclaimed by General Assembly of the United Nations on 25 November 1981 (resolution 36/55)
More informationRELIGION AND BELIEF EQUALITY POLICY
Document No: PP120 Issue No. 02 Issue Date: 2017-02-01 Renewal Date: 2020-02--1 Originator: Head of Learner Engagement, Equalities, Diversity and Inclusion Responsibility: Deputy Principal, Finance and
More informationMulti-faith Statement - University of Salford
Multi-faith Statement - University of Salford (adapted in parts from Building Good Relations with People of Different Faiths and Beliefs, Inter Faith Network for the UK 1993, 2000) 1. Faith provision in
More informationThe British Humanist Association's Submission to the Joint Committee of both Houses on the reform of the House of Lords
The British Humanist Association's Submission to the Joint Committee of both Houses on the reform of the House of Lords The case against ex-officio representation of the Church of England and representation
More informationReligious Freedom in the UK Neil Addison Talk 24 Sep 2010
Religious Freedom in the UK Neil Addison Talk 24 Sep 2010 Neil Addison, Barrister and National Director of the Thomas More Legal Centre was one of the speakers at a conference in Dublin organised by The
More informationL A W ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND LEGAL POSITION OF CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Article 1
Pursuant to Article IV, Item 4a) and in conjuncture with Article II, Items 3g) and 5a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, at the 28 th
More informationFreedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University
University of Newcastle - Australia From the SelectedWorks of Neil J Foster January 23, 2013 Freedom of Religion and Law Schools: Trinity Western University Neil J Foster Available at: https://works.bepress.com/neil_foster/66/
More informationCompendium of key international human rights agreements concerning Freedom of Religion or Belief
Compendium of key international human rights agreements concerning Freedom of Religion or Belief Contents Introduction... 2 United Nations agreements/documents... 2 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
More informationPROF KOBUS VAN ROOYEN SC (CHAIRPERSON) MS G HARPER MS N MAKAULA-NTSEBEZA MR A MELVILLE DR L VENTER
CASE NUMBER: 04/2014 DATE OF HEARING: 13 MARCH 2014 JUDGMENT RELEASE DATE: 11 APRIL 2014 VAN DER MERWE COMPLAINANT vs RADIO ROSESTAD RESPONDENT TRIBUNAL: PROF KOBUS VAN ROOYEN SC (CHAIRPERSON) MS G HARPER
More informationDoes the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution?
Does the offence of blasphemy have a future under the South African constitution? Kobus van Rooyen University of Pretoria Abstract This article reflects upon the question of whether the offence of blasphemy
More information90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:
90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903-1639 Telephone: 719.475.2440 Fax: 719.635.4576 www.shermanhoward.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Ministry and Church Organization Clients
More informationDRAFT PAPER DO NOT QUOTE
DRAFT PAPER DO NOT QUOTE Religious Norms in Public Sphere UC, Berkeley, May 2011 Catholic Rituals and Symbols in Government Institutions: Juridical Arrangements, Political Debates and Secular Issues in
More informationUNITED KINGDOM CASE LAW DATABASE
UNITED KINGDOM CASE LAW DATABASE Religion and Diversity Project University of Ottawa By: Marianne Abou-Hamad Last updated: August 17, 2012 1 Table of Contents 2001----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
More informationApostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha
Apostasy and Conversion Kishan Manocha In the context of a conference which tries to identify how the international community can strengthen its ability to protect religious freedom and, in particular,
More informationWHAT FREEDOM OF RELIGION INVOLVES AND WHEN IT CAN BE LIMITED
WHAT FREEDOM OF RELIGION INVOLVES AND WHEN IT CAN BE LIMITED A QUICK GUIDE TO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM Further information Further information about the state of religious freedom internationally together with
More informationA NATIONAL AGENDA FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
A NATIONAL AGENDA FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY People of faith have numerous concerns about threats to religious freedom in Australia, both at state and federal levels, deriving from an attitude
More informationGUIDANCE TO EDUCATION AUTHORITIES AND SCHOOLS ON THE EQUALITY ACT 2006
abcdefghijklm = påüççäë=aáêéåíçê~íé = pìééçêí=ñçê=ié~êåáåö=aáîáëáçå= Directors of Education, Managers of grant aided schools and Proprietors of independent schools sáåíçêá~=nì~ó= bçáåäìêöü=bes=snn= = qéäééüçåéw=mnpnjoqq=mvmv=
More informationRELIGIOUS FREEDOMS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
ALBANA METAJ-STOJANOVA RELIGIOUS FREEDOMS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA DOI: 10.1515/seeur-2015-0019 ABSTRACT With the independence of Republic of Macedonia and the adoption of the Constitution of Macedonia,
More informationBowring, B. Review: Malcolm D. Evans Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas."
Birkbeck eprints: an open access repository of the research output of Birkbeck College http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk Review: Malcolm D. Evans Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas." Security
More informationMill and Bentham both endorse the harm principle. Utilitarians, they both rest
Free Exercise of Religion 1. What distinguishes Mill s argument from Bentham s? Mill and Bentham both endorse the harm principle. Utilitarians, they both rest their moral liberalism on an appeal to consequences.
More informationThe Freedom of Religion - Religious Harmony Premise in Society
The Freedom of Religion - Religious Harmony Premise in Society PhD Candidate Oljana Hoxhaj University of "Isamil Qemali" Vlora, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Law oljana.hoxhaj@gmail.com Doi:10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n6p193
More informationReligion at the Workplace
Applying EU Anti-Discrimination Law Trier, 18-19 September 2017 Religion at the Workplace Professor Gwyneth Pitt Freedom of religion Freedom of thought, conscience and belief a recognised human right UDHR
More informationIf Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman
27 If Everyone Does It, Then You Can Too Charlie Melman Abstract: I argue that the But Everyone Does That (BEDT) defense can have significant exculpatory force in a legal sense, but not a moral sense.
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations
More informationSubmission to the Religious Freedom Review February Independent Schools and Religious Freedom
Submission to the Religious Freedom Review February 2018 Independent Schools and Religious Freedom The Independent Schools Victoria Vision: A strong Independent education sector demonstrating best practice,
More informationCobaw Community Health Services Limited v Christian Youth Camps Limited & Anor (Anti-Discrimination) [2010] VCAT 1613 (8 October 2010)
Cobaw Community Health Services Limited v Christian Youth Camps Limited & Anor (Anti-Discrimination) [2010] VCAT 1613 (8 October 2010) http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/vcat/2010/1613.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=cobaw
More informationReview of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT)
Review of the Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT) June 2014 Introduction Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission into the ACT Law Reform Advisory Council ( LRAC ) review of the Discrimination Act
More informationDISSENT AND COMPLAINT AGAINST A DECISION OF THE PRESBYTERY OF ABERDEEN
ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS 37 DISSENT AND COMPLAINT AGAINST A DECISION OF THE PRESBYTERY OF ABERDEEN We, Ian Aitken, Peter Dickson, Scott Guy, Louis Kinsey, Hugh Wallace, Nigel Parker, Dominic Smart, Thomas
More informationRecent Developments and Overall Trends in the Relationship between Religion, Law and State in Europe Ronan McCrea 23 January 2014
Introduction Recent Developments and Overall Trends in the Relationship between Religion, Law and State in Europe Ronan McCrea 23 January 2014 There are two main issues where European law affects religion:
More informationAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING THE CRIMINAL TRIAL OF ABDUL RAHMAN FOR CONVERTING FROM ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY
Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D. Chief Counsel AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW REGARDING THE CRIMINAL TRIAL OF ABDUL RAHMAN FOR CONVERTING FROM ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY March 24, 2006
More informationResolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/456/Add.2 (Part II))]
United Nations A/RES/65/211 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2011 Sixty-fifth session Agenda item 68 (b) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/456/Add.2
More informationFREEDOMS AND PROHIBITIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF LAÏCITÉ (CONSTITUTIONAL SECULARISM)
FREEDOMS AND PROHIBITIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF LAÏCITÉ (CONSTITUTIONAL SECULARISM) The last decades have seen the emergence, in a fragile social context, of new phenomena, such as the rise in communitarian
More informationRe: The Education Bill 2011 and schools/academies with a religious character ADVICE TO THE EHRC
Re: The Education Bill 2011 and schools/academies with a religious character Introduction ADVICE TO THE EHRC 1. You want my opinion on the issues raised in correspondence from the National Secular Society
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF KOSTESKI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF KOSTESKI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA (Application no. 55170/00)
More informationEquality Policy: Equality and Diversity for Pupils
Equality Policy: Equality and Diversity for Pupils This Policy was adopted by the Governing Body in May 2015 This policy will be reviewed in 2018 or as legislation changes 1 Our Mission Statement At Grays
More informationUNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW JOINT SUBMISSION 2018
NGOS IN PARTNERSHIP: ETHICS & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION (ERLC) & THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE (RFI) UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW JOINT SUBMISSION 2018 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN MALAYSIA The Ethics & Religious
More informationWHEN AND HOW MUST AN EMPLOYEE S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BE ACCOMMODATED? HEALTH DIRECTORS LEGAL CONFERENCE JUNE 8, 2017
WHEN AND HOW MUST AN EMPLOYEE S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BE ACCOMMODATED? HEALTH DIRECTORS LEGAL CONFERENCE JUNE 8, 2017 Diane M. Juffras School of Government THE LAW Federal First Amendment to U.S. Constitution
More informationPhil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority
Phil 114, April 24, 2007 until the end of semester Mill: Individual Liberty Against the Tyranny of the Majority The aims of On Liberty The subject of the work is the nature and limits of the power which
More informationGrievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations
Grievance and Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Congregations 1.0 Introduction The Congregation is committed to providing a safe environment where the dignity of every individual is respected and therefore
More informationUK Law Student Review April 2012 Volume 1, Issue 1
UK Law Student Review April 2012 Volume 1, Issue 1 LIMITATIONS ON THE WEARING OF RELIGIOUS DRESS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Keith Golder, University of Birmingham
More informationUnited Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review. Ireland. Submission of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Ireland Submission of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty 21 March 2011 3000 K St. NW Suite 220 Washington, D.C. 20007 T: +1 (202) 955 0095
More informationShirley Chaplin. Gary McFarlane. -v- United Kingdom
Shirley Chaplin Gary McFarlane -v- United Kingdom --------------------------------------------- Oral Submission -------------------------------------------- The cases of Shirley Chaplin and Gary McFarlane
More informationGood morning, and welcome to America s Fabric, a radio program to. encourage love of America. I m your host for America s Fabric, John McElroy.
1 [America s Fabric #11 Bill of Rights/Religious Freedom March 23, 2008] Good morning, and welcome to America s Fabric, a radio program to encourage love of America. I m your host for America s Fabric,
More informationThe Changing Position of Religious Minorities in English Law: The Legacy of Begum
1 The Changing Position of Religious Minorities in English Law: The Legacy of Begum Russell Sandberg * Cardiff University The school is often seen as a microcosm of wider society. It is therefore fitting
More informationSANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE
SANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE Hugh Baxter For Boston University School of Law s Conference on Michael Sandel s Justice October 14, 2010 In the final chapter of Justice, Sandel calls for a new
More informationR (on the application of X (by her father and litiagtion friend)) - and - The Headteachers of Y School. The Governors of Y School
Neutral Citation Number: [2006] EWHC 298 (Admin) Case No: CO/10461/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 21/02/2007 B e f o r e : MR
More informationInstitute on Religion and Public Policy. Report on Religious Freedom in Egypt
Institute on Religion and Public Policy Report on Religious Freedom in Egypt Executive Summary (1) The Egyptian government maintains a firm grasp on all religious institutions and groups within the country.
More informationLaw of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic on Freedom of Worship (25/10/1990)
Law of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic on Freedom of Worship (25/10/1990) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. The Purpose of This Law The purpose of the Law of the RSFSR on Freedom of Worship
More informationPolicy on Religious Education
Atheism Challenging religious faith Policy on Religious Education The sole object of Atheism is the advancement of atheism. In a world in which such object has been fully achieved, there would be no religion
More informationHOUSE OF LORDS EXTRACTS FROM OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE
HOUSE OF LORDS ANNEX EXTRACTS FROM OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE Regina v. Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others (Respondents) ex parte Williamson (Appellant)
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN
Strasbourg, 16 October 2012 Opinion 681/2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ON THE DRAFT JOINT OPINION
More informationTHE PROBLEM OF BLASPHEMY AND DEFAMATION OF RELIGION LAWS
THE PROBLEM OF BLASPHEMY AND DEFAMATION OF RELIGION LAWS Paul Sturges Loughborough University, UK Introduction Precisely on the day the first words of this Spotlight were written, a newspaper story reported
More informationRELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN PLURALIST SOCIETY: HOW DOES ARTICLE 9 FIT IN?
RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN PLURALIST SOCIETY: HOW DOES ARTICLE 9 FIT IN? Introduction 1. In this talk I will be considering the impact of Article 9 in the sphere of education and addressing two key questions:
More informationACT ON CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", no. 36/06)
ACT ON CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia", no. 36/06) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Freedom of religion Article 1 Everyone is guaranteed, in accordance with the Constitution,
More informationRESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. [on the report of the Third Committee (A/49/610/Add.2)]
UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/RES/49/188 6 March 1995 Forty-ninth session Agenda item 100 (b) RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY [on the report of the Third Committee (A/49/610/Add.2)]
More informationCase Notes. Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School
Case Notes Religious Schools and Equal Opportunity: Lessons from Goldberg v Korsunski Carmel School Kate Offer, Law School, University of Western Australia The decision of the Equal Opportunity Tribunal
More informationEnsuring equality of religion and belief in Northern Ireland: new challenges
Ensuring equality of religion and belief in Northern Ireland: new challenges Professor John D Brewer, MRIA, AcSS, FRSA Department of Sociology University of Aberdeen Public lecture to the ESRC/Northern
More informationDiscrimination based on religion Case study on the exclusion based on religion
Discrimination based on religion Case study on the exclusion based on religion Conference: Fight against discrimination: The race and framework employment directives European Law Academy ERA, TRIER Germany
More informationMarcus & Auerbach LLC Attorneys at Law 1121 N. Bethlehem Pike, Suite Spring House, PA 19477
Marcus & Auerbach LLC Attorneys at Law 1121 N. Bethlehem Pike, Suite 60-242 Spring House, PA 19477 Jerome M. Marcus Telephone: 215.885.2250 Facsimile: 888.875.0469 jmarcus@marcusauerbach.com VIA EMAIL
More informationDurham Research Online
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 20 June 2012 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Leigh, I. (2012) 'Religious
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before : Mr Richard Chalkley (Chairman) Mr A F Sherward. And SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
KH Heard at Field House AS (Christian Apostates - Evidence) Iran [2003] UKIAT 00182 On 16 July 2003 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Date Determination notified: 19.9.2003 Between Before : Mr Richard Chalkley
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at: Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On: 2 November 2017 On: 24 November Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration And Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/00455/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On: 2 November 2017 On: 24 November 2017 Before
More informationFact vs. Fiction. Setting the Record Straight on the BSA Adult Leadership Standards
Fact vs. Fiction Setting the Record Straight on the BSA Adult Leadership Standards Overview: Recently, several questions have been raised about the BSA s new leadership standards and the effect the standards
More informationCENSORSHIP & EXPRESSION Philosophy and Ethics: Issues of Human Rights
CENSORSHIP & EXPRESSION Philosophy and Ethics: Issues of Human Rights Miss J Carr Censorship Suppressing or limiting access to materials considered obscene, offensive or a threat to security. Article 19
More informationRULING OF LAW NORTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL CONFERENCE
RULING OF LAW NORTHEASTERN JURISDICTIONAL CONFERENCE Mark J. Webb, Bishop August 4, 2016 STATEMENT OF FACTS On Thursday, July 14, 2016, in regular session of the 2016 Northeastern Jurisdictional Conference,
More informationInstitute on Religion and Public Policy Report: Religious Freedom in Uzbekistan
Executive Summary Institute on Religion and Public Policy Report: Religious Freedom in Uzbekistan (1). The Republic of Uzbekistan pays homage to the concept of religious freedom in name only. The Law of
More informationthe Middle East (18 December 2013, no ).
Letter of 24 February 2014 from the Minister of Security and Justice, Ivo Opstelten, to the House of Representatives of the States General on the policy implications of the 35th edition of the Terrorist
More informationJoshua Rozenberg s interview with Lord Bingham on the rule of law
s interview with on the rule of law (VOICEOVER) is widely regarded as the greatest lawyer of his generation. Master of the Rolls, Lord Chief Justice, and then Senior Law Lord, he was the first judge to
More informationCare home suffers under equality laws. How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly care home a 13,000 grant
Care home suffers under equality laws How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly care home a 13,000 grant Care home suffers under equality laws How traditional Christian beliefs cost an elderly
More informationState for Education and Employment and others (Respondents) ex parte Williamson (Appellant) and others
TLANDJudgments - Regina v. Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others (Respondents) ex parte Williamson (Appellant) and others HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2004-05 [2005] UKHL 15 on appeal from:
More informationFace-to-face and Side-by-Side A framework for inter faith dialogue and social action. A response from the Methodist Church
Face-to-face and Side-by-Side A framework for inter faith dialogue and social action The Methodist Church has about 295,000 members and 800,000 people are connected with the Church. It has not been possible
More informationFreedom of religion at the workplace in Europe
Freedom of religion at the workplace in Europe Prof. Lucy Vickers Oxford Brookes University lrvickers@brookes.ac.uk This training session is commissioned under the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme
More informationThe Wearing of Christian Baptismal Crosses
The Wearing of Christian Baptismal Crosses Hegumen Philip Ryabykh is the representative of Russian Orthodox Church in Strasbourg, Igor Ponkin is director of the Institute for State-Confessional Relations
More informationUnited Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review France
United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review France Submission of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty 8 February 2008 1350 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 605 Washington, D.C. 20036 T: +1
More informationPaper 1: Justice Must Be Seen To Be Done : Organisational Justice And Islamic Headscarf And Burqa Laws In France. Nicky Jones INTRODUCTION
Paper 1: Justice Must Be Seen To Be Done : Organisational Justice And Islamic Headscarf And Burqa Laws In France Nicky Jones INTRODUCTION 6 In late 1989, the first events of the affair of the headscarf
More informationPanel: Mr. Peter Leaver QC (United Kingdom), President; Mr. Hans Nater (Switzerland); Mr. Olli Rauste (Finland)
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS ad hoc Division (O.G. Salt Lake City) 02/007, Korean Olympic Committee (KOC) / International Skating Union (ISU), Panel: Mr. Peter
More informationDiscrimination on grounds of religion or belief latest case law of the European Courts
Discrimination on grounds of religion or belief latest case law of the European Courts Prof. Lucy Vickers Oxford Brookes University lrvickers@brookes.ac.uk EU Equality law and ECtHR EU Directive 2000/78
More informationGood Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application. on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have
Wednesday, 4 April 2018 (10.00 am) Good Morning. Now, this morning is a Hearing of an application on behalf of 5 individuals on whom orders to provide written statements have been served and the application
More informationCommunication from Moshé Machover to the legal queries unit
Email: mmachover@gmail.com Communication from Moshé Machover to the legal queries unit 16 October 2017 I refer to your letters of 3 and 6 October 2017, excluding me from the Labour Party on allegations
More informationThe protection of the rights of parents and children belonging to religious minorities
7 December 2016 The protection of the rights of parents and children belonging to religious minorities Revised report 1 Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination Rapporteur: Mr Valeriu Ghiletchi, Republic
More informationWhat is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age
Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 31 Issue 1 Volume 31, Summer 2018, Issue 1 Article 5 June 2018 What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious
More informationTolerance in French Political Life
Tolerance in French Political Life Angéline Escafré-Dublet & Riva Kastoryano In France, it is difficult for groups to articulate ethnic and religious demands. This is usually regarded as opposing the civic
More informationTestimony on ENDA and the Religious Exemption. Rabbi David Saperstein. Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism
Testimony on ENDA and the Religious Exemption Rabbi David Saperstein Director, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism House Committee on Education and Labor September 23, 2009 Thank you for inviting
More informationDorata RABCZEWSKA. Third-party intervention submissions by ARTICLE 19
In the European Court of Human Rights App. No. 8257/13 Between Dorata RABCZEWSKA Applicant v. Poland Respondent Government Third-party intervention submissions by ARTICLE 19 Introduction 1. This third-party
More informationRemarks by Bani Dugal
The Civil Society and the Education on Human Rights as a Tool for Promoting Religious Tolerance UNGA Ministerial Segment Side Event, 27 September 2012 Crisis areas, current and future challenges to the
More informationSPIRITUAL DECEPTION MATTERS LIBRARY LEGAL GUIDELINES. Protecting the Jewish Community from Hebrew-Christians*
SPIRITUAL DECEPTION MATTERS LIBRARY LEGAL GUIDELINES Protecting the Jewish Community from Hebrew-Christians* Introduction Spiritual Deception Matters (SDM) staff has received calls over the years regarding
More informationGenesis and Analysis of "Integrated Auxiliary" Regulation
The Catholic Lawyer Volume 22, Summer 1976, Number 3 Article 9 Genesis and Analysis of "Integrated Auxiliary" Regulation George E. Reed Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl
More informationSelect Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief The Guide Executive Summary
Select Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief The Guide Executive Summary 1 Select Committee on Human Sexuality in the Context of Christian Belief Executive Summary 2 Select Committee
More informationJohn Locke. compelling governmental interest approach to regulate. religious conduct, and I will discuss the law further below.
compelling governmental interest approach to regulate religious conduct, and I will discuss the law further below. One should note, though, that although many criticized the Court s opinion in the Smith
More informationOur Challenging Way: Faithfulness, Sex, Ordination, and Marriage Barry Ensign-George and Charles Wiley, Office of Theology and Worship
Our Challenging Way: Faithfulness, Sex, Ordination, and Marriage Barry Ensign-George and Charles Wiley, Office of Theology and Worship The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), in recent decisions on ordination
More informationTHE QUEEN. on the application of:
Ref:- DRO/AJG/BRI-20409-001 On behalf of the Claimant Witness Statement of David Voas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL
More informationReligious Life in England and Wales
Religious Life in England and Wales Executive Report 1 study commissioned by the Compass Project Compass is sponsored by a group of Roman Catholic Religious Orders and Congregations. Introduction In recent
More information