Outline. The argument from so many arguments. Framework. Royall s case. Ted Poston
|
|
- Clement Parsons
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Outline The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston University of South Alabama Plantinga Workshop Baylor University Nov 6-8, Measuring confirmation Framework Log likelihood measure 2 The cumulative e ect of the arguments Weak independent evidence Mixed independent evidence 3 Independence Independence 4 Conclusions Conclusions Framework We can make probabilistic comparisons which respect to evidence and hypotheses.(keynes; 1921) The notion of probability is inductive probability. (Maher; 2006, 2010) The only hypotheses that concern us are theism (T) and naturalism ( T) Odds form of Bayes s Theorem: Pr(T e i ) Pr( T e i ) = Pr(e i T ) Pr(e i T ) Pr(T ) Pr( T ) Urn 1 (all white balls) and Urn 2 (equal proportion of white and black balls). An urn is selected at the flip of a fair coin, then a ball is selected at random, its color is recorded and it is placed back in the urn, and the contents are thoroughly mixed.(royall; 1997) Pr(white i Urn1) = 1 Pr(white i Urn2) = 0.5 Pr(Urn1) = Pr(Urn2) = 0.5
2 Pr(white 1 )= 3 4 [Pr(white 1 Urn1) Pr(Urn1)] + [Pr(white 1 Urn2) Pr(Urn2)] Pr(Urn1 White 1)= Pr(White 1 Urn1) Pr(Urn1) (Pr(White 1 Urn1) Pr(Urn1))+Pr(White 1 Urn2) Pr(Urn2)) = 1.5 (1.5)+(.5.5) = 2 3 Pr(Urn2 White 1)= 1 3 White 1 confirms that Urn 1 was selected. Suppose all you learn is that white i and white j. Pr(white i urn1) Pr(white i urn2) =2& Pr(white j urn1) Pr(white j urn2) =2 White i &White j independently confirm that Urn 1 was selected. Pr(White (1,2,...,n) Urn1) Pr(White (1,2,...,n) Urn2) = 1.5 =2 n n LR: Pr(E H) Pr(E H) = n Table: Number of successive white balls (b) corresponding to values of a likelihood ratio (LR) LR b Each draw of white is confirmationally independent regarding an urn hypothesis, but the draws are not unconditionally independent. E.g., Pr(white 2 white 1 ) = Pr(white 2 ). What probabilistic feature of is responsible for the intuitive judgement that w 1 and w 2 are confirmationally independent regarding the hypothesis that Urn 1 was selected? The selection of an urn screens o white on 1 from white on 2. 1 Pr(w 2 Urn1&w 1 )=Pr(w 2 Urn1) 2 Pr(w 2 Urn2&w 1 )=Pr(w 2 Urn2)
3 Log likelihood measure Key features 1 Given a likelihood ratio we can find a corresponding number of white balls. 2 The individual selections are not unconditionally probabilistically independent. 3 The individual selections are probabilistically independent regarding H (and H). 4 A clear case of the evidential value of evidential diversity. For reasons I won t discuss this uniquely picks up the log likelihood measure of confirmation. See (Fitelson; 2001) c(h, e) =log[ Pr(e h) Pr(e h) ] The log-likelihood measure is also additive. Two arguments which are entirely independent, neither weakening nor strengthening the other, ought, when they concur, to produce a[n intensity of] belief equal to the sum of the intensities of belief which either would produce separately. (Peirce; 1878) Likelihood ratios compared to log likelihood ratio 1 # of successive white balls.5 Likelihood ratio (LR) log likelihood ratio (LLR) Positive evidence for theism is an order of magnitude greater on theism than naturalism. For each e i, log[ Pr(e i T ) Pr(e i T ) ]=1 Is each item of evidence for theism individually this strong? A LLR=1 is equivalent to the selection of 3.3 white balls in a row. It s not unreasonable that some items of evidence e.g., fine-tuning, the existence of rational creatures, etc individually has a LLR of 1.(Swinburne; 2004, ) The useful feature of a LLR of 1 is that it s easy to add the cumulative e ect of multiple items of evidence.
4 Successive white balls related to LLRs # of successive white balls log likelihood ratio Table: Comparison of # of independent arguments for theism with # of successive white balls # of independent arguments for theism # of successive white balls Weak independent evidence How powerful is the evidence against theism? Does it take away all the white balls or just some? How much of a di erence is there between the priors? Is the surprise factor that theism is true like the selection 16.6 white balls from Urn 2? (e.g., LLR of 5) Nonetheless, we can say that if a LLR of 1 is correct and there are multiple arguments for theism then the evidential case for theism is strong. Suppose the evidence for theism is independent regarding T but it is only slightly more likely given T than T. Let the likelihood ratio is this: Pr(e i T ) Pr(e i T ) = a = a 9 A LR of 10 9 is very weak evidence. In this case the LLR would be It would take approximately 22 independent items of evidence to equal the confirmatory power of 1 white ball.
5 Other Models Independence This approach to thinking about confirmation makes it easy to sum the strength of independent evidence. Is the individual evidence for theism like the selection of 1 ball, 2 balls, 3 balls, etc. Then just find the corresponding LLR and add to find the cumulative e ect. If there are di erent LLR values for di erent lines of evidence then we can still just add to get a cumulative value and then find the equivalent number of white balls. Finally, we can add in the evidence against theism to get a measure of overall evidential strength. Are the arguments / evidences conditionally independent regarding theism? Definition e 1 and e 2 are (mutually) confirmationally independent regarding H according to c if and only if both c(h, e 1 e 2 )=c(h, e 1 )and c(h, e 2 e 1 )=c(h, e 2 ) (Fitelson; 2001) For each e i, e j does this condition hold? (S) Pr(e i T ) Pr(e i T ) = Pr(e i T &e j ) Pr(e i T &e j ) Independence Conclusions (S) Pr(e i T ) Pr(e i T ) = Pr(e i T &e j ) Pr(e i T &e j ) Are there families of theistic arguments / evidences that meet this condition? The ontological, cosmological, teleological, and moral arguments plausibly meet (S). Multiple design arguments do not meet condition (S) (Dougherty and Poston; 2008) Several of the two dozen or so arguments presuppose intentionality; they won t met condition (S). 1 On relatively weak assumptions theism has an evidential case as strong as the selection of 16 white balls in a row (a LLR of 5). 2 If Plantinga s two dozen arguments are probabilistically independent regarding theism then the evidential case for theism is like the selection of over 80 white balls in a row. 3 The evidential case against theism is easily taken account to yield a final verdict.
6 References Dougherty, T. and Poston, T. (2008). A user s guide to teleological arguments, Religious Studies 44: Fitelson, B. (2001). A bayesian account of independent evidence with applications, Philosophy of Science 68(3): Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding, Journal of Philosophy 71(1): Keynes, J. M. (1921). ATreatiseonProbability,Macmillan. Maher, P. (2006). The concept of inductive probability, Erkenntnis 65: Maher, P. (2010). Bayesian probability, Synthese 172: Peirce, C. S. (1878). The probability of induction, Popular Science Monthly 12: Plantinga, A. (2007). Two dozen (or so) theistic arguments, in B. Deane-Peter (ed.), Alvin Plantinga, CambridgeUniversityPress,pp Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A likelihood paradigm, Chapman and Hall. Swinburne, R. (2004). The Existence of God, 2ndedn,OxfordUniversityPress.
The argument from so many arguments
The argument from so many arguments Ted Poston May 6, 2015 There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn t. John Von Neumann My goal in this paper is to offer
More informationCourse Webpage:
PHL/REL 351, Philosophy of Religion Dr. Poston T,R 2 to 3:15 (HUMB 136) Office: HUMB 124 Office Hours: 3:15 to 4:15 & by appt Phone: 460-6248 Email: poston@southalabama.edu Spring 2018 Update: Wednesday,
More informationThe end of the world & living in a computer simulation
The end of the world & living in a computer simulation In the reading for today, Leslie introduces a familiar sort of reasoning: The basic idea here is one which we employ all the time in our ordinary
More information2014 THE BIBLIOGRAPHIA ISSN: Online First: 21 October 2014
PROBABILITY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION. Edited by Jake Chandler & Victoria S. Harrison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. 272. Hard Cover 42, ISBN: 978-0-19-960476-0. IN ADDITION TO AN INTRODUCTORY
More informationLearning not to be Naïve: A comment on the exchange between Perrine/Wykstra and Draper 1 Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley
1 Learning not to be Naïve: A comment on the exchange between Perrine/Wykstra and Draper 1 Lara Buchak, UC Berkeley ABSTRACT: Does postulating skeptical theism undermine the claim that evil strongly confirms
More information2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa Japan, November 2015
2nd International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA 2015), Kanagawa Japan, November 2015 On the Interpretation Of Assurance Case Arguments John Rushby Computer Science Laboratory SRI
More informationTHE ROLE OF COHERENCE OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON- DYNAMIC MODEL OF CONFIRMATION TOMOJI SHOGENJI
Page 1 To appear in Erkenntnis THE ROLE OF COHERENCE OF EVIDENCE IN THE NON- DYNAMIC MODEL OF CONFIRMATION TOMOJI SHOGENJI ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of coherence of evidence in what I call
More informationEvidential arguments from evil
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48: 1 10, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Evidential arguments from evil RICHARD OTTE University of California at Santa
More informationJeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN
Jeffrey, Richard, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 140 pp, $21.99 (pbk), ISBN 0521536685. Reviewed by: Branden Fitelson University of California Berkeley Richard
More informationDiscussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning
Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning Ivan Phillips - http://www.meetup.com/the-chicago-philosophy-meetup/events/163873962/ Bayes Theorem tells us how we ought to update our beliefs in a set of predefined
More informationCS485/685 Lecture 5: Jan 19, 2016
CS485/685 Lecture 5: Jan 19, 2016 Statistical Learning [RN]: Sec 20.1, 20.2, [M]: Sec. 2.2, 3.2 CS485/685 (c) 2016 P. Poupart 1 Statistical Learning View: we have uncertain knowledge of the world Idea:
More informationHIGH CONFIRMATION AND INDUCTIVE VALIDITY
STUDIES IN LOGIC, GRAMMAR AND RHETORIC 46(59) 2016 DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2016-0036 Universidade Nova de Lisboa HIGH CONFIRMATION AND INDUCTIVE VALIDITY Abstract. Does a high degree of confirmation make an
More informationCopan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292
Copan, P. and P. Moser, eds., The Rationality of Theism, London: Routledge, 2003, pp.xi+292 The essays in this book are organised into three groups: Part I: Foundational Considerations Part II: Arguments
More informationBeyond the Doomsday Argument: Reply to Sowers and Further Remarks
Beyond the Doomsday Argument: Reply to Sowers and Further Remarks NICK BOSTROM George Sowers tries to refute the Doomsday argument on grounds that true random sampling requires all possible samples to
More informationDispelling the Disjunction Objection to Explanatory Inference Kevin McCain and Ted Poston
Dispelling the Disjunction Objection to Explanatory Inference Kevin McCain and Ted Poston Abstract: Although inference to the best explanation (IBE) is ubiquitous in science and our everyday lives, there
More informationLecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability
Lecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 John Maynard Keynes 1883: Born in Cambridge, England 1904: B.A. Cambridge University 1914 18: World War I 1919:
More informationThe Evidential Argument from Evil
DANIEL HOWARD-SNYDER INTRODUCTION: The Evidential Argument from Evil 1. The "Problem of Evil Evil, it is often said, poses a problem for theism, the view that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly
More informationA New Bayesian Solution to the Paradox of the Ravens 1
Forthcoming in Philosophy of Science. Penultimate version. A New Bayesian Solution to the Paradox of the Ravens 1 Susanna Rinard Abstract The canonical Bayesian solution to the ravens paradox faces a problem:
More informationAgainst Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Pp. xiii, 232.
Against Coherence: Page 1 To appear in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. Erik J. Olsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. xiii,
More informationDetachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood
Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood GILBERT HARMAN PRINCETON UNIVERSITY When can we detach probability qualifications from our inductive conclusions? The following rule may seem plausible:
More information6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3
6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
More informationReligious Studies / Volume 44 / Issue 01 / March 2008, pp DOI: /S X, Published online: 11 January 2008
Religious Studies http://journals.cambridge.org/res Additional services for Religious Studies: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here
More informationKelly James Clark and Raymond VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief, Oxford UP, 2011, 240pp., $65.00 (hbk), ISBN
Kelly James Clark and Raymond VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief, Oxford UP, 2011, 240pp., $65.00 (hbk), ISBN 0199603715. Evidence and Religious Belief is a collection of essays organized
More informationPlantinga, Van Till, and McMullin. 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? ( )
Plantinga, Van Till, and McMullin I. Plantinga s When Faith and Reason Clash (IDC, ch. 6) A. A Variety of Responses (133-118) 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? (113-114)
More informationExplanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic
Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic A central problem facing a probabilistic approach to the problem of induction is the difficulty of sufficiently constraining prior probabilities so
More informationPhilosophy 148 Announcements & Such. Inverse Probability and Bayes s Theorem II. Inverse Probability and Bayes s Theorem III
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 148 Lecture 1 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 148 Lecture 2 Philosophy 148 Announcements & Such Administrative Stuff I ll be using a straight grading scale for this course. Here
More informationLogic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of
Logic: Inductive Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. The quality of an argument depends on at least two factors: the truth of the
More informationLogic: inductive. Draft: April 29, Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises P1,
Logic: inductive Penultimate version: please cite the entry to appear in: J. Lachs & R. Talisse (eds.), Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. New York: Routledge. Draft: April 29, 2006 Logic is the study
More informationTable of x III. Modern Modal Ontological Arguments Norman Malcolm s argument Charles Hartshorne s argument A fly in the ointment? 86
Table of Preface page xvii divinity I. God, god, and God 3 1. Existence and essence questions 3 2. Names in questions of existence and belief 4 3. Etymology and semantics 6 4. The core attitudinal conception
More informationOxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 7 (2016): 1 31 (please cite published version) Evil and Evidence
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 7 (2016): 1 31 (please cite published version) Evil and Evidence Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne, and Yoaav Isaacs 1 Introduction The problem of evil presents
More informationAnd if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. 1 Corinthians 15:17
IV. Did Jesus Really Rise From the Dead? Video: Did Jesus Rise From the Dead (William Lane Craig at Yale University, 2014) Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_naoc6ctw1s And if Christ has not been
More informationObjective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober
Objective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober Michael Strevens November 2008 Abstract Elliott Sober argues that the statistical slogan Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence cannot be taken
More informationVindicating a Bayesian Approach to Con firming Miracles
PHILOSOPHIA CHRISTI VOL. 10, NO. 1 2008 Vindicating a Bayesian Approach to Con firming Miracles A Response to Jordan Howard Sobel s Reading of Hume JOHN DEPOE Department of Philosophy University of Iowa
More informationMixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9:
Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 01.23.13 Francis Schaeffer I do not believe there is any one apologetic which meets the needs of all people. And,
More informationIs God Good By Definition?
1 Is God Good By Definition? by Graham Oppy As a matter of historical fact, most philosophers and theologians who have defended traditional theistic views have been moral realists. Some divine command
More informationBradley on Chance, Admissibility & the Mind of God
Bradley on Chance, Admissibility & the Mind of God Alastair Wilson University of Birmingham & Monash University a.j.wilson@bham.ac.uk 15 th October 2013 Abstract: Darren Bradley s recent reply (Bradley
More informationSimplicity and Why the Universe Exists
Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists QUENTIN SMITH I If big bang cosmology is true, then the universe began to exist about 15 billion years ago with a 'big bang', an explosion of matter, energy and space
More informationA Refutation of Skeptical Theism. David Kyle Johnson
A Refutation of Skeptical Theism David Kyle Johnson The evidential problem of evil suggests that our awareness of the existence of seemingly unjustified evils reduces the epistemic probability of God s
More informationAN EVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENT AGAINST NATURALISM? Timothy O'Connor Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1994),
1 AN EVOLUTIONARY ARGUMENT AGAINST NATURALISM? Timothy O'Connor Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1994), 527-540 I Introduction In his recently published two-volume work in epistemology, 1 Alvin Plantinga
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction
Philosophy 5340 - Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction In the section entitled Sceptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding
More informationThe St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox
The St. Petersburg paradox & the two envelope paradox Consider the following bet: The St. Petersburg I am going to flip a fair coin until it comes up heads. If the first time it comes up heads is on the
More informationDegrees of Belief II
Degrees of Belief II HT2017 / Dr Teruji Thomas Website: users.ox.ac.uk/ mert2060/2017/degrees-of-belief 1 Conditionalisation Where we have got to: One reason to focus on credences instead of beliefs: response
More informationRALPH WEDGWOOD. Pascal Engel and I are in agreement about a number of crucial points:
DOXASTIC CORRECTNESS RALPH WEDGWOOD If beliefs are subject to a basic norm of correctness roughly, to the principle that a belief is correct only if the proposition believed is true how can this norm guide
More informationIs atheism reasonable? Ted Poston University of South Alabama. Word Count: 4804
Is atheism reasonable? Ted Poston University of South Alabama Word Count: 4804 Abstract: Can a competent atheist that takes considerations of evil to be decisive against theism and that has deeply reflected
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationChance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason
Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Baylor University October 8, 2015 Contents The Principle of Sufficient Reason Against the PSR Chance Fundamental
More informationThe intrinsic probability of theism
Received: 22 March 2018 Revised: 15 May 2018 Accepted: 17 May 2018 DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12523 ARTICLE The intrinsic probability of theism Calum Miller Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford,
More informationLecture 8 Keynes s Response to the Contradictions
Lecture 8 Keynes s Response to the Contradictions Patrick Maher Scientific Thought II Spring 2010 Introduction The Principle of Indifference is usually understood as saying: If there is no known reason
More informationFiring Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument Jonathan Weisberg
Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 56 (2005), 809 821 Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument Jonathan Weisberg ABSTRACT Elliott Sober has recently argued that the cosmological design argument is
More informationKey definitions Action Ad hominem argument Analytic A priori Axiom Bayes s theorem
Key definitions Action Relates to the doings of purposive agents. A key preoccupation of philosophy of social science is the explanation of human action either through antecedent causes or reasons. Accounts
More informationPhil 611: Problem set #1. Please turn in by 22 September Required problems
Phil 611: Problem set #1 Please turn in by September 009. Required problems 1. Can your credence in a proposition that is compatible with your new information decrease when you update by conditionalization?
More informationRATIONALITY AND SELF-CONFIDENCE Frank Arntzenius, Rutgers University
RATIONALITY AND SELF-CONFIDENCE Frank Arntzenius, Rutgers University 1. Why be self-confident? Hair-Brane theory is the latest craze in elementary particle physics. I think it unlikely that Hair- Brane
More informationA Rejection of Skeptical Theism
Conspectus Borealis Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 8 2016 A Rejection of Skeptical Theism Mike Thousand Northern Michigan University, mthousan@nmu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.nmu.edu/conspectus_borealis
More informationSCIENCE CAN A SCIENTIST BELIEVE IN GOD? Peter M. Budd Professor of Polymer Chemistry University of Manchester
CAN A SCIENTIST BELIEVE IN? CiS Manchester: The Manchester Science and Philosophy Group 2 nd March 2011 Café Muse, Manchester Museum This is not a verbatim account, but notes made after the event. Peter
More informationrichard swinburne Oriel College, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 4EW
Religious Studies 37, 203 214 Printed in the United Kingdom 2001 Cambridge University Press Plantinga on warrant richard swinburne Oriel College, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 4EW Alvin Plantinga Warranted
More informationNICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1
DOUBTS ABOUT UNCERTAINTY WITHOUT ALL THE DOUBT NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH Norby s paper is divided into three main sections in which he introduces the storage hypothesis, gives reasons for rejecting it and then
More information11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce
isaac levi 11 Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce 1. probable deduction Peirce wrote extensively on deduction, induction, and hypothesis beginning with the Harvard
More informationContemporary Philosophy of Religion
Running Head 1 http//www.humanities-ebooks.co.uk Philosophy Insights General Editor: Mark Addis Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Steven Duncan If God is omniscient, He cannot plead ignorance Publication
More informationIs Epistemic Probability Pascalian?
Is Epistemic Probability Pascalian? James B. Freeman Hunter College of The City University of New York ABSTRACT: What does it mean to say that if the premises of an argument are true, the conclusion is
More informationToday s Lecture. Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie
Today s Lecture Preliminary comments on the Problem of Evil J.L Mackie Preliminary comments: A problem with evil The Problem of Evil traditionally understood must presume some or all of the following:
More informationReasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty
Synthese (2007) 156:427 439 DOI 10.1007/s11229-006-9132-y ORIGINAL PAPER Reasoning about the future: Doom and Beauty Dennis Dieks Published online: 12 April 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
More informationWHAT LOTTERY PROBLEM FOR RELIABILISM?
1..20 WHAT LOTTERY PROBLEM FOR RELIABILISM? by JUAN COMESAÑA Abstract: It can often be heard in the hallways, and occasionally read in print, that reliabilism runs into special trouble regarding lottery
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationWhat Lottery Problem for Reliabilism?
What Lottery Problem for Reliabilism? Juan Comesaña Abstract It can often be heard in the hallways, and occasionally read in print, that reliabilism runs into special trouble regarding lottery cases. My
More informationImprecise Bayesianism and Global Belief Inertia
Imprecise Bayesianism and Global Belief Inertia Aron Vallinder Forthcoming in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Penultimate draft Abstract Traditional Bayesianism requires that an agent
More informationLecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability
Lecture 1 The Concept of Inductive Probability Patrick Maher Philosophy 517 Spring 2007 Two concepts of probability Example 1 You know that a coin is either two-headed or two-tailed but you have no information
More informationDefusing the Common Sense Problem of Evil
Defusing the Common Sense Problem of Evil Chris Tweedt Faith and Philosophy (2015) Abstract The inductive argument from evil contains the premise that, probably, there is gratuitous evil. According to
More informationCLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH I. Challenges to Confirmation A. The Inductivist Turkey B. Discovery vs. Justification 1. Discovery 2. Justification C. Hume's Problem 1. Inductive
More informationGandalf s Solution to the Newcomb Problem. Ralph Wedgwood
Gandalf s Solution to the Newcomb Problem Ralph Wedgwood I wish it need not have happened in my time, said Frodo. So do I, said Gandalf, and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them
More informationAlvin Plantinga An Evaluation of Reformed Epistemology. Jessica Wagner Patrick Henry College
1 Alvin Plantinga An Evaluation of Reformed Epistemology Jessica Wagner Patrick Henry College Is there a God? How does one know God exists? What is the relationship between faith and reason? These are
More informationOutline. The Resurrection Considered. Edwin Chong. Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate
The Resurrection Considered Edwin Chong July 22, 2007 Life@Faith 7-22-07 Outline Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate Life@Faith 7-22-07 2 1 Broader
More informationWhat is a counterexample?
Lorentz Center 4 March 2013 What is a counterexample? Jan-Willem Romeijn, University of Groningen Joint work with Eric Pacuit, University of Maryland Paul Pedersen, Max Plank Institute Berlin Co-authors
More informationGrade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons
Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons I. Introduction: (1 day) Look at p. 1 in the textbook with your child and learn how to use the math book effectively. DO:
More informationSidgwick on Practical Reason
Sidgwick on Practical Reason ONORA O NEILL 1. How many methods? IN THE METHODS OF ETHICS Henry Sidgwick distinguishes three methods of ethics but (he claims) only two conceptions of practical reason. This
More informationUltimate Naturalistic Causal Explanations
Ultimate Naturalistic Causal Explanations There are various kinds of questions that might be asked by those in search of ultimate explanations. Why is there anything at all? Why is there something rather
More informationHempel s Paradox, Law-likeness and Causal Relations
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01373.x Philosophical Investigations 32:3 July 2009 ISSN 0190-0536 Hempel s Paradox, Law-likeness and Causal Relations Severin Schroeder, University of Reading It is natural
More informationThe Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics. Peter van Inwagen. = WestviewPress. A Division of HarperCollinsPublishers
The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics Peter van Inwagen = WestviewPress A Division of HarperCollinsPublishers L To my stepchildren Noel, Eamon, and Claire Lawless All
More informationMark Schroeder. Slaves of the Passions. Melissa Barry Hume Studies Volume 36, Number 2 (2010), 225-228. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms and Conditions
More informationThe Problem of Induction. Knowledge beyond experience?
The Problem of Induction Knowledge beyond experience? Huygens method One finds in this subject a kind of demonstration which does not carry with it so high a degree of certainty as that employed in geometry;
More informationCamino Santa Maria, St. Mary s University, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA;
religions Article God, Evil, and Infinite Value Marshall Naylor Camino Santa Maria, St. Mary s University, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA; marshall.scott.naylor@gmail.com Received: 1 December 2017; Accepted:
More informationHow Not to Detect Design Critical Notice: William A. Dembski, The Design Inference*
W.A. DEMBSKI, THE DESIGN INFERENCE 473 How Not to Detect Design Critical Notice: William A. Dembski, The Design Inference* Branden Fitelson, Christopher Stephens, Elliott Sobertl Department of Philosophy,
More informationHow Not to Detect Design*
How Not to Detect Design* A review of William A. Dembski s The Design Inference -- Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998. xvii + 243 pg. ISBN 0-521-62387-1.
More informationHPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics)
HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics) General Questions What is the distinction between a descriptive and a normative project in the philosophy of science? What are the virtues of this or that
More informationA Bayesian formulation of the kalam cosmological argument
Religious Studies (2014) 50, 521 534 Cambridge University Press 2014 doi:10.1017/s0034412514000171 A Bayesian formulation of the kalam cosmological argument CALUM MILLER St Hugh s College, University of
More informationWhy Good Science Is Not Value-Free
Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free Karim Bschir, Dep. of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich FPF 2017 Workshop, Zurich Scientific Challenges in the Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials
More informationSWINBURNE ON THE SIMPLICITY OF THEISM
SWINBURNE ON THE SIMPLICITY OF THEISM University of Melbourne Abstract. This paper argues that (1) Richard Swinburne s general account of the simplicity of empirical hypotheses fails because it involves
More informationTorah Code Cluster Probabilities
Torah Code Cluster Probabilities Robert M. Haralick Computer Science Graduate Center City University of New York 365 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 006 haralick@netscape.net Introduction In this note we analyze
More informationEvidentialism and Conservatism in Bayesian Epistemology*
compiled on 5 January 2018 at 10:42 Evidentialism and Conservatism in Bayesian Epistemology* Wolfgang Schwarz Draft, 5 January 2018 What is the connection between evidential support and rational degree
More informationLogic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God, by John Howard Sobel.
1 Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God, by John Howard Sobel. Cambridge University Press, 2003. 672 pages. $95. ROBERT C. KOONS, University of Texas This is a terrific book. I'm often
More informationEpistemic Value and the Jamesian Goals Sophie Horowitz
Epistemic Value and the Jamesian Goals Sophie Horowitz William James famously argued that rational belief aims at two goals: believing truth and avoiding error. 1 What it takes to achieve one goal is different
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Evidence Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons
Penn State Law elibrary Journal Articles Faculty Works 1991 Credal Probability David H. Kaye Penn State Law Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works Part of the Evidence
More informationBy J. Alexander Rutherford. Part one sets the roles, relationships, and begins the discussion with a consideration
An Outline of David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion An outline of David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion By J. Alexander Rutherford I. Introduction Part one sets the roles, relationships,
More informationCSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I. Introduction to Probability
CSSS/SOC/STAT 321 Case-Based Statistics I Introduction to Probability Christopher Adolph Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences University of Washington, Seattle
More informationAct individuation and basic acts
Act individuation and basic acts August 27, 2004 1 Arguments for a coarse-grained criterion of act-individuation........ 2 1.1 Argument from parsimony........................ 2 1.2 The problem of the relationship
More informationScientific Progress, Verisimilitude, and Evidence
L&PS Logic and Philosophy of Science Vol. IX, No. 1, 2011, pp. 561-567 Scientific Progress, Verisimilitude, and Evidence Luca Tambolo Department of Philosophy, University of Trieste e-mail: l_tambolo@hotmail.com
More informationNOTES ON WILLIAMSON: CHAPTER 11 ASSERTION Constitutive Rules
NOTES ON WILLIAMSON: CHAPTER 11 ASSERTION 11.1 Constitutive Rules Chapter 11 is not a general scrutiny of all of the norms governing assertion. Assertions may be subject to many different norms. Some norms
More informationGrade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home
Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home I. Introduction: (1 day) Look at p. 1 in the textbook with your child and learn how to use the math book effectively. DO: Scavenger
More informationReligious Epistemology
Religious Epistemology Trent Dougherty & Chris Tweedt Forthcoming in Philosophy Compass Religious epistemology is the study of how subjects religious beliefs might have, or fail to have, some form of positive
More informationWhat should I believe? Only what I have evidence for.
What should I believe? Only what I have evidence for. We closed last time by considering an objection to Moore s proof of an external world. The objection was that Moore does not know the premises of his
More information1 FAITH AND REASON / HY3004
1 FAITH AND REASON / HY3004 FAITH AND REASON / HY3004 SEMESTER 2 / 2016 NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY PHILOSOPHY GROUP Meeting Times / Venue Thursdays 9:30AM 12:30PM / HSS Seminar Room 8 Instructor
More information