PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION"

Transcription

1 PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMISSION REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had before the Village of Northfield Plan and Zoning Commission taken at the Northfield Village Hall, Board Room, Northfield, Illinois on the nd day of October, 0, at the hour of :0 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: BILL VASELOPULOS, Chairman THOMAS BOLLING DAN deloys TRACEY MENDREK TODD BERLINGHOF KATHY ESTABROOKE E. LEONARD RUBIN CONNIE BERMAN MEMBERS ABSENT: STEVEN HIRSCH ALSO PRESENT: STEVE GUTIERREZ, Community Development Director PATRICK GLENN, Village Engineer

2 0 0 CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Good evening, everyone. I'd like to call to order the Plan & Zoning Commission. My name is Bill Vaselopulos, I'm Chairman of the Commission. At this time, I'd like the Commissioners to introduce themselves, starting with Connie. MS. BERMAN: Connie Berman. MR. RUBIN: Leonard Rubin. MS. ESTABROOKE: Kathy Estabrooke. MR. BERLINGHOF: Todd Berlinghof. MS. MENDREK: Tracey Mendrek. MR. DELOYS: Dan deloys. MR. BOLLING: Tom Bolling. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Thank you very much. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to conduct a public hearing and to consider and discuss these requests for approval of special permits located at: 00 Happ Road, Petitioner is Alan Denenberg and Todd Denenberg; and what's called the Willow Road PUD located at 0, 0,,, 0, 0 and Willow Road, the Petitioner's name is R Northfield, LLC. The public hearing format will provide an overview of these proposals and a forum for public comment and input. This Commission is a recommending

3 0 0 body only, and we will forward our recommendations to the Village President and the Board of Trustees for final determination on whether or not to grant these items before us today. The Board will then consider these items that are being discussed today at the next Board meeting which is Tuesday, October th, 0 at :00 p.m. right here in this board room. Commission meetings require that all persons wishing to be heard and to enter testimony must be sworn in. This includes all petitioners and individuals with the petitioners and any interested parties or other property owners. Following the petitioner's presentation and after the Commission has had an opportunity to ask questions and discuss amongst ourselves, then all other interested parties will be given an opportunity to speak. Prior to speaking, we request that all parties step forward to the microphone, be sworn in, and provide their name, address, and interest in this matter for the record. These proceedings are being recorded, and that is why we request you speak only at the podium where the microphone is located. The first order of business is to pass

4 0 0 the minutes from our last meeting from -- I'm looking for the date, I apologize. September th, 0. Is there a motion? MR. BERLINGHOF: Motion to approve. MR. BOLLING: Second. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: All those in favor? (Chorus of ayes.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: All opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Motion carries, thank you very much. Our first petition before us will be 00 Happ Road. Petitioner's name is Alan Denenberg and Todd Denenberg. But before they step to the microphone, Steve, do you have any introductory comments? MR. GUTIERREZ: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Petitioners are seeking a special use in order to operate a pizza restaurant at 00 Happ Road as you indicated. This particular tenant space used to be occupied by another pizzeria which has subsequently closed. The property is zoned Village Center VC, and restaurants are a special use in the Village Center, thus requiring them to be here tonight. The restaurant as proposed would be open

5 0 0 seven days a week. The Petitioner intends to have up to four full-time employees and part-time employees, with five employees working in the restaurant at the same period of time, up to five working in the restaurant at the same period of time, and up to five delivering pizzas. Again, this is on their busiest nights that they would anticipate. They will have counter service, takeout, and delivery. They will have some tables and chairs in the restaurant as well as have some in the patio of the restaurant front, at the front of the front doors. They will not be making any changes to the building facade or any exterior improvements such as landscaping or lighting or anything like that. They will be reconfiguring the layout slightly to install a handicap accessible restroom towards the front of the facility or the tenant space and convert a restroom they have in the back into an office. The Petitioner requires a variation to the off-street parking requirement for this center. The center has parking spaces which are commonly used by all of the tenants. There are none that are reserved for certain tenants. The code requires parking

6 0 0 spaces for this current tenant mix. Now, Staff would suggest that this type of use is a known commodity in the center. We have not experienced, we did not experience parking issues with the previous pizzeria. Again, that use is less or more intense than the proposed use. So, Staff is comfortable in that the parking lot should accommodate the proposed use. That said, we would still suggest, if this is approved, that the Petitioner be required to have their employees park in the remote areas of the center's parking lot. The very north portion of the parking lot is the least used as is the south portion after the workout facility has closed. So, basically, in evenings, that south portion of the lot is not used very much. So, other than that, that is what we have for you for this petition. The Petitioners are here. They're prepared to make a short presentation if you'd like, or to simply answer your questions. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay, thank you, Steve. Would the Petitioners like to step forward to the microphone? State your name and be sworn in please.

7 0 0 MR. ALAN DENENBERG: My name is Alan Denenberg. This is my son Todd Denenberg. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Steve is going to swear both of you at the same time. MR. GUTIERREZ: Please raise your right hand. (Witnesses sworn.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Do you have a few prepared remarks? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Alan Denenberg, this is my son Todd Denenberg. We are here in order to request a special use to operate a pizzeria in the formerly established pizzeria restaurant. Most of the items that I was going to speak of to present to you, Mr. Gutierrez has just told you about it. So, I don't want to repeat everything he said. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Stole your thunder, huh? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes. MR. GUTIERREZ: Sorry. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: So, he took all my thunder away. My son and I have been in the business for almost 0 years, in the pizza business. We own a

8 0 0 couple of other pizza businesses. I think we would be an asset to the community, and in the community that we're in. We do a lot of community work and a lot of charitable work. We would continue on that same way in this establishment. Do you have anything to say? MR. TODD DENENBERG: No, I don't think I do. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: I would like to answer any questions that there might be. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: What other establishments do you currently have? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: We have two establishments in Glen View called Viccino's Restaurant, a pizzeria. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay, I didn't know that. MR. GUTIERREZ: Didn't either. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Well, this space was occupied by Viccino's at one point. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes, but we were not involved in that restaurant. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: You're using a different name now? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes, we are. It's called

9 0 0 Northshore Pizza. MR. RUBIN: The burning question I have is are you serving deep dish or thin crust. MR. TODD DENENBERG: Of course, of course. Both. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: What is your favorite? MR. TODD DENENBERG: Both? MR. RUBIN: Both, absolutely. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes. The answer is yes. MR. RUBIN: Good, thank you. MR. BERLINGHOF: I'll make a motion. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Does anyone else have, one second. Does anyone else have any other questions or comments? Does anyone from the audience have any other questions or comments? MR. MILLER: I do. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: If you would please step to the microphone? MR. MILLER: Certainly. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: For Petitioners, you can just step to the side. You can stay up there, you may have to answer a question here. No, you're fine. You're fine right there. If you would state your name

10 0 0 0 and please be sworn in? MR. MILLER: My name is Ira Miller. I live at 0 Happ. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Great, thank you. (Witness sworn.) MR. MILLER: I sort of hate to throw cold water on what is a kumbaya moment obviously. However, I live immediately adjacent to the location of these premises. I watched the delivery people park all over the place. They park in the handicap zone where they pick up, the handicap bus picks up a person who lives in our building who is handicapped, they observed nothing in the way of decorum with regard to the way they park. For that reason and if no other, you have two other entities in that building that are also given special use because there isn't adequate parking. If the Village thought that the off-street parking limits were appropriate, they would have not, or inappropriate, they would have given you the ability to use special use on everything. But instead, every time somebody comes to rent the premises there, they appear before this Board to get special use. Either we've got a zoning ordinance or we

11 0 0 don't. Because of the way that prior pizza establishments have operated with their delivery people, I respectfully request that you take a real good hard look at this and perhaps deny the facility. I'll answer any questions anybody has. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: One of the things I think in our motion is that delivery people shall not park in the parking lot in front of the restaurant. Now, we can make it part of this motion, that's up to the Village obviously or the tenants that are next to it to make sure that happens. The only thing we can do other than, this is a new operator, the old operator obviously is gone, the old operator had some issues, this is a new operator. That's been in use, it's been there for a long time. So, I do think that it's important that we make sure those problems were fixed. But it's going to be also up to the Village, because these issues do happen, that you tell the Village so they can police that issue, especially when -- MR. MILLER: It's just, it's the nature of the delivery people. They're always in a hurry. They park wherever, they park without any decorum at all. In

12 0 0 addition, when they're hanging out in the back of the place, they throw garbage on our lawns. The delivery people like this are a real problem. But that's not -- MR. BERLINGHOF: Well, it's the owner and the manager that you should be talking to. MR. MILLER: Well, but the real problem is the parking because they do in fact occupy and block the handicap parking. This is to the south end where they park. I don't know if you're familiar with this lot as you sit here. But the south end is where they all park and their cars are askew all the time. Their parking is a nightmare and I've observed it for years when Viccino's was there. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Yes, so the delivery is supposed to be done in the back of the store, not in the front of the store, and they're parking in the southern part of the parking lot around the corner near the handicap spots there. MR. MILLER: And that's where their problem is. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Those are the ones you're concerned about, right? MR. MILLER: Yes.

13 0 0 CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: If the Petitioner would like to step forward and maybe address this? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes, I'd like to. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: And what you plan to do about this? MR. ALAN DENENBERG: I can't speak as to what happened before. I can only say if any of these problems do arise, I would give him my name and my personal number, he can call me and I will address those and take care of the problem if it did arise. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Would you notify all of your delivery people? Some of them would maybe be new and different. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: No question about it, yes. We want to be a good -- CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Even those are not new and different, they may be violating the location that they can park. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Yes, we would like to be a good neighbor, because that's good for our business if we're a good neighbor. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay, thank you. MR. MILLER: I've done this little walk before

14 0 0 with the prior management. They all said we'll address that. For a day or two, it was addressed, and then the delivery people, by their nature, because of the speediness of which they are expected to deliver and do things, it just doesn't work. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: If the Petitioner is, they've reached out to you and they are willing to work with you. If they are not meeting, you know, the needs as you see it, this is a condition of their special use, that the delivery has to be in proper parking spaces in or around the back, then you can bring it to the Village and the Village can enforce the provision in the special use. So, if for some reason they are not being cooperative, which I'm not saying they won't because they will be very cooperative, but you can always come to the Village if you feel that they are not addressing your concerns. MR. MILLER: Will the Police Department enforce that? CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: I can't speak for the Police Department, but that's something that you can bring up with the Village Community Development Department or Steve. He then can forward that to the

15 0 0 appropriate authorities. MR. MILLER: Thank you for listening. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Thank you. Does anyone else in the audience have any questions or comments? Any other questions or comments from the Commission? Would someone like to make a motion? MR. BERLINGHOF: I do. I would make a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval of a Special Use and off-street parking variation in order to operate a restaurant at 00 Happ Road in accordance with the Petitioner's applications and supportive materials dated stamped August th, 0 subject to conditions one through. MR. RUBIN: Second. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: All those in favor? (Chorus of ayes.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: All opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Motion carries. Thank you very much to both of you. MR. TODD DENENBERG: Thank you. MR. ALAN DENENBERG: Thank you, gentlemen. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: The next item before

16 0 0 us is the Willow Road PUD. The address is, I'll read them off again, on Willow Road are 0, 0,,, 0, 0 and. Petitioner's name is R Northfield, LLC. Before I throw it over to Steve to introduce this item and give us more details, I want to announce that Connie Berman, one of our Commissioners, the business that she works at has a relationship with this Petitioner. So, she is recusing herself due to that conflict of interest. So, she will not participate in any deliberations, nor will she be able to vote. She just will abstain from voting. Steve, do you have any introductory comments? MR. GUTIERREZ: I have to apologize. The Petitioner provided us the PowerPoint at the last second. We did not have a chance to bring this up previously. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay. MR. GUTIERREZ: So, if you don't mind maybe taking a five-minute break? I'd like to get this PowerPoint running for them. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay, we'll recess for

17 0 0 five minutes and we'll adjourn at :. We will adjourn and resume at :, I apologize. Thank you for the correction. (Off the record.) CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay, everyone, we're going to resume our meeting. If you could have a seat please? I've already announced the next item before us. I mentioned that Connie asked to recuse herself. Before the Petitioners step up, Steve is going to give some introductory comments and recap where we're at with this. This is a petition that's been before us before. Then after the Petitioner is done with their presentation, I'm going to ask Steve to recap some of the items that the Commissioners need to focus on as we consider this. This is a multi, there are many issues within this petition and we want to make sure we're looking at everything in the right way. So, Steve? MR. GUTIERREZ: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just to recap real quickly, on July th, the Plan and Zoning Commission held their first hearing on this project which is a proposed planned unit development and a proposed preliminary plat of subdivision. The

18 0 0 Petitioner, since that initial hearing, has revised, has submitted a set of revised plans which increases the land area dedicated to the stormwater facilities, it reduces the number of homes from to, and it widens the proposed roadway from feet to feet. It adds a three-foot carriage walk on the east side of the street which reduces the front yard setbacks as a result from, the closest front yard was at feet, and now it's proposed I believe at although I think on one of the plans it shows feet inches. I believe the Petitioner indicates that they're actually proposing -foot front yard setback. Again, this is the home that would be the closest to the street. They have also eliminated the walking paths that had the underground detention facilities in the first plan, as well as the look-out deck that they had proposed at the edge of one of the detention basins. The primary submittal that they've provided maintains the two restricted access entrances. So, there are two entrances, both with right-in and right-out where you can only pull up the roadway, the little road to pull into, and make a right turn into the development. Turning out of the development, you can

19 0 0 only make a right turn onto Willow Road. The Petitioner has also submitted an alternate site plan that provides full access at the entrance, the southernmost entrance onto Willow Road. I'm going to refer to the first with the two restricted access entrances as Plan A, and the alternate with the one full access entrance as Plan B going forward here. In this alternate plan they have, it involves the removal of a planted portion of the Willow Road right of way. There is a raised median that extends from Chapel Hill down to Wagner, and a good half of that raised median is planted with landscaping, a couple of trees, some bushes, and ground cover and grasses. In this proposed alternate Plan B, it would actually eliminate all that landscaping in order to accommodate the leftturn lane that they're proposing. The plan also, this alternate Plan B, also involves the use of a small piece of Village property that they would need to, in order to align this full access entrance with Chapel Hill where there is currently a break in the median, in order to do that, they would need to bend their roadway through this small piece of Village property at the southern tip of the

20 0 0 0 site. Now, I just want to clarify, and I'm sure they'll give you all the details on the site plan. I just want to clarify that that triangle that they would use for this alternate access entrance, this full access entrance, is not within that 00-foot right of way of the old, what we call the Old Willow Road right of way. It's just adjacent to it but it's not part of that 00- foot right of way. The Plan B, the alternate access Plan B would also reposition some of the homes to accommodate the roadway bending down and through this triangular piece of property. Again, the developer will I have not doubt outline exactly which homes would be moved. It also reconfigures the stormwater facility basins. You can see that on the site plan. At this point, the developer has not provided the engineering or the technical stormwater management plan for this alternate site with the reconfigured basins. That will come back, that will be important as we move along in my presentation and ultimately how the Plan and Zoning Commission can act on that alternate Plan B. With all other respects, the alternate Plan B with the full access entryway is essentially the

21 0 0 same as the Plan A. homes, same width of sidewalk, the three-foot carriage walk, the walking paths have been eliminated in both plans. Now, both plans still require variations, a number of variations to the zoning code and to the subdivision code. I'm going to walk through those really quickly. You have those in the chart that we provided in your memo, but for the benefit of the audience, I want to just run through those really quickly. For the zoning code, they are seeking a variation to the minimum lot size requirement. They are proposing,000, what calculates out to, square feet per home. Again, this would require a variation, a zoning code variation. Also, they're proposing a minimum front yard requirement of feet while the zoning code requires 0 feet. They are proposing a minimum rear yard of feet, that actually hasn't changed in this revised plan but still does require a variation. They are proposing a minimum side yard of five feet where the code requires feet. Again, this has not changed from the original application but does involve a variation. Now, under the subdivision code, again

22 0 0 the subdivision code is a separate code from the zoning code, but it outlines requirements for subdivisions in terms of the design standards. So, the subdivision code requires sidewalks to be five feet wide and to be set back at a minimum of six feet from the roadway. They are proposing with their revised plan a three-foot carriage walk which essentially is a sidewalk just behind the curb, meaning adjacent to the street. Again, that requires a variation still. The original application had no sidewalks; they're actually adding the carriage walk. The subdivision code also requires street lights in every intersection. The original application had not provided any. They are now suggesting that, they are now indicating that they'll provide street lights throughout the roadway. I believe those are indicated in the landscape plan in their submittal, it's not indicated in the engineering plan. But again, they indicated that they will be providing those, that will have to be fleshed out a little further on the engineering plan. Mid-block pedestrian way, the code provides that you have a block that's 00 feet or longer

23 0 0 that there is a pedestrian way approximately in the center of that block. A pedestrian way basically is, you know, a break between the homes that would lead you back to, whether it's an open area or adjacent street or what have you. There is no pedestrian way being provided in the revised application. The subdivision code also requires minimum lot width of feet. The original application had lot width ranging from feet to. The revised application, again both plans indicate lot width ranging from feet to feet, but still requiring a variation. Then finally, the minimum lot depth, the subdivision code requires 0 feet. They are proposing lot depth ranging from to feet. Those are the variations that are being proposed in the new revised plan. Again, those apply on both the Plan A and Plan B, the revised Plan A and revised Plan B. Stormwater, again as indicated, they are proposing standard stormwater facilities. In the original application, the Village engineers did not feel that the original stormwater plan was adequate in that

24 0 0 it relied on a pump storage system. I won't go into the details of why that was inadequate, but they did not feel that that was a sound plan. The revised plans, again with the expanded facilities, eliminate the need for the pump storage system. Our engineers now indicate that this new plan A conforms to the Village code. Again, we don't have the technical calculations or the technical report for revised Plan B, so we can't comment or they can't comment on that point at this point in time. Pat Glenn with Gewalt Hamilton Associates is here. He's here to answer any questions you might have on that. If you'd like to ask that now, later, he's here to answer any questions you might have on our perspective on it. The Petitioner I'm sure will present their revised engineering approach. Roadway width, again they widened the roadway width. It now meets the subdivision code requirement which is feet, so at feet they're meeting that requirement. However, the Fire Chief remains concerned that if there's cars allowed to park on the roadway, this will still not allow them the clear access that they need in order to get through the

25 0 0 roadway in a hurry. Staff has recommended that if this application is approved at some point, that a condition be placed on any approval that would prohibit parking on the roadway, and that guest parking, some type of guest parking facility be provided that would accommodate landscape vehicles. Also, we would recommend that a guest parking facility be required that would accommodate landscape vehicles, landscape trucks with their trailers, which really are the most frequent type of vehicles you see parked on any given side street. With regard to sidewalks, the proposed three-foot carriage walk adjacent to the roadway, it still does not meet the code requirements outlined earlier. More importantly, the Village Engineer and the Police Chief and the Fire Chief are concerned that the three feet, this three-foot sidewalk or carriage walk immediately adjacent to the street is still not going to be adequately safe. As I have outlined I think in my original memo, in order to vary from the sidewalk requirements of the subdivision code, the Village Engineer, Police Chief and Fire Chief need to actually certify or find that the proposed sidewalk is adequate.

26 0 0 They're not willing to do that at this point in time. Density, again they reduced the number of homes. However, the revised, even at the homes, this density is still approximately four times, just shy of four times the density that's allowed under the existing R- zoning code standards. In addition, the homes haven't been pulled apart any more than they were in the original plan. They're still very close to each other. The elimination of the two homes, that area that was gained by that, the land really was taken up by the expansion of the detention facilities, so it didn't benefit the kind of close knit proximity of the homes to each other or did not affect that. Finally, with regard to density, the Village zoning code outlines under a PUD that the density can be varied or relief can be provided to the density requirements. However, it does come with a couple of criteria that need to be met in order to allow for that, one of which is that the proposed plan be no less beneficial to the homeowners in and around the proposed site than what would be allowed under the R- standard, the one acre requirement. The second criteria for allowing this density, this variation in density is

27 0 0 the provision of all the R- setbacks along the boundaries of the site. So, this would essentially be the rear yards that are required by R-. Again, what's being proposed as opposed to the 0 feet that's required is rear yards down to feet on the south edge of the property within the rear yards of feet along Bracken Lane and Willow Road. So, it does not appear that this criteria has been met. With regard to traffic, we talked about the new entrance, I'm sorry, the proposed alternate plan, this plan again as it involves the use of Village property, there's a couple of different things that need to occur in addition to the zoning consideration. One is the use of Village property which is actually a separate process, it certainly would be related but it's a separate process in which the developer would come directly to the Village Board to seek the use of the property and the mode of the use, whether it's going to be acquisition, easement or what have you. That all is something the Village Board will deal with directly. The IDOT, the Illinois Department of Transportation, as Willow Road is their jurisdiction, also would need to permit the design of the proposed

28 0 0 full access plan. That is, my understanding is that it's in the works and the developer can give you more insight in terms of the timing of that, but that again is something that ultimately will be required regardless of the zoning discussion and zoning approvals or zoning votes, or any vote on the zoning or PUD piece of this. All that said, the Village Board would likely find it helpful to understand and get feedback from the Plan and Zoning Commission with regard to this alternate access plan. Again, in terms of the planning issues or concerns, if you get to the point where you want to discuss that as an option, then they would again prefer that you give them the feedback on that which they can then take into account and discuss this separate issue of using the Village property. The developer, it's my understanding, is seeking input on that, general feedback on the use of that Village property, excuse me, on that alternate full access plan. Now, I'll get into the, a little bit later after the developer has made a presentation, about how you deal with both plans, Plan A and Plan B, if they are different and how you're able to vote on those two. But we'll deal with that after a little bit.

29 0 0 That's what I have up to this point. Obviously, the developer is here to make their presentation. If you have any questions before that, I'll be happy to answer them. MR. BERLINGHOF: Steve, just a quick question. What is the Village's long-term intent for that property as well as the, what do you call it, West Willow, the right of way that runs down behind this, behind Bracken -- MR. GUTIERREZ: Actually, Pat probably can answer that in a little bit more detail. Generally, and again if you want we can give you more detail, generally there is a proposed plan, and I'm not sure where we're at with regard to consideration of that plan. MR. GLENN: It will come to the Board at the actual meeting. MR. GUTIERREZ: I'm going to let Pat give you a short overview of what's going on with that. I will say that this triangle is not a piece of what he's about to talk about. MR. BERLINGHOF: Right, I understand. MR. GLENN: Right. So, we have come up with what we're calling the West Bosworth drainage

30 0 0 0 improvements conceptually, and that involves storm sewer, large storm sewers from the Bosworth neighborhood, south of this neighborhood, as well as future detention, stormwater detention in that unimproved right of way. So, the answer to what's the Village's long-term use of that unimproved West Willow right of way is we would use for stormwater management purposes. We have confirmed, like Steve said, that this proposed use would not preclude the project proceeding in the unimproved right of way. MR. BERLINGHOF: Is it aboveground or an underground detention facility? MR. GLENN: This will all be open. MR. BERLINGHOF: This will all be open. Has anyone talked about putting the two together in some way, shape or form and utilizing both properties for this? I mean they obviously have created a detention area between the two sections of the homes, and you're talking about creating another brand new detention area in the 00-foot right of way which of course is going to cause, you've got some issues, right, how deep you can go and what your slopes are going to be and the whole bit unless you're going to make it wet. So, has there

31 0 0 ever been any discussion as to whether or not that detention area can be added to the other detention area if things are moved a little bit in order to make it even bigger and better? MR. GLENN: We're at the very conceptual stage with West Bosworth drainage. As I mentioned, we'll bring a proposal to bring more detail to that to the Board at the October meeting. I think there is a possibility, there's kind of two separate watersheds here. There's a whole book this fat explaining that. The watershed, the area that flows through, the Walden Lane side actually is largely separate from the Bosworth area. But nonetheless, we would definitely look to see if there is a way, perhaps with some piping that we could, you know, make both systems work together if things develop further. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Any other questions on this? MS. MENDREK: I want to just clarify, Steve, one thing you said about the sidewalks when you said that the Village, I think that Police and Fire weren't going to certify those sidewalks? Would you just revisit what you said there?

32 0 0 MR. GUTIERREZ: So, the subdivision code says that if the subdivision doesn't provide the required standard sidewalk of five feet to six feet gap from the curb, that in order to approve that, the Village Board ultimately would need a report from the Village Engineer, the Fire Chief, and the Police Chief indicating that they are satisfied with what's being proposed. And they're not satisfied with what's being proposed, so they're not able to provide that report. MR. BOLLING: That's not just with the sidewalk, that's with the sidewalk and the density? MR. GUTIERREZ: Density isn't an issue for them. MR. BOLLING: Okay, it's strictly with the sidewalk and the width of the lane? MR. GUTIERREZ: The width of the roadway meets the subdivision standard, okay. In addition to that standard, the Fire Chief is concerned that if parking is allowed, so this is, they met the technical requirement for the roadway width, and the Fire Chief is a little concerned that if parking is allowed or happens on that street, that that would impede their ability to get through with their trucks.

33 0 0 MR. BOLLING: Yes, so as proposed, they feel that the sidewalk is not safe and the width of the roadway, though it meets the standard, would not -- MR. GUTIERREZ: Be adequate. MR. BOLLING: Be adequate for if cars were allowed to park on one of the sides. MR. GUTIERREZ: Correct. MR. BERLINGHOF: So, is it smaller than a standard road in our Village? MR. GUTIERREZ: No. MR. BERLINGHOF: So, why would Ingram and Bosworth and all the other ones that are out there -- MR. GUTIERREZ: If they were being approved today, we would apply the same comment. MR. BERLINGHOF: Okay, so is it a new standard? It's the first new road -- MR. GUTIERREZ: I don't know when those were built so I can't tell you if the standard existed at that time. MR. BERLINGHOF: Just for curiosity, if they eliminated the sidewalk all together, they'd ask for a variance of no sidewalk, right? MR. GUTIERREZ: Correct.

34 0 0 MR. BERLINGHOF: Then the Fire Chief would have nothing to say about it, right, because there's no sidewalk. Does that mean -- MR. GUTIERREZ: No, Staff would be concerned that that would force people to walk down the roadway. MR. BERLINGHOF: Yes, no, I'm not suggesting that we do it. I'm just curious how the ordinance works. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: The original proposal did not have any sidewalk. MR. BERLINGHOF: Right. MR. GUTIERREZ: Right, right, and we were concerned. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: It was suggested to them to put sidewalks in. MR. GUTIERREZ: Yes, yes. Sorry, I didn't repeat that earlier. MR. BERLINGHOF: Right, because most of the R- doesn't have sidewalks, right? MR. GUTIERREZ: That's correct. MR. BERLINGHOF: So, it's a matter of what we think is, given the opportunity with a new subdivision, what we think would be advisable?

35 0 0 MR. GUTIERREZ: Sure. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Okay. Yes? MS. MENDREK: I know we were going to talk about this afterwards, but I wonder if we all understand what our options are here tonight. MR. BOLLING: Yes, what are we -- MS. MENDREK: Before we get into the discussion of those. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Yes. Steve was going to let the Petitioners make their presentation and immediately review that. Would you rather he do that now? That's what you're suggesting I assume? MS. MENDREK: Kind of. MR. GUTIERREZ: Absolutely, absolutely. MS. ESTABROOKE: Well, I kind of have to agree with that because then you can be thinking about -- MR. GUTIERREZ: Sure, okay, absolutely. So, essentially for Plan A with the two restricted access entrances, they have provided all of the application requirements for that, the engineering, the landscape plan, everything that the code requires for applications that you have so you can review and use in deliberation. That's all been provided with Plan A.

36 0 0 So, a couple of things. Actually I should have prefaced all of this with there is a provision in our zoning code, actually our subdivision code as well as in the Plat Act that requires that the Plan and Zoning Commission vote up or down on a subdivision, a proposed subdivision, up or down within 0 days of its submittal. That would be this week essentially, so you would need to vote on that tonight, on the plans that you have. Again, there is a, technically they are asking for a PUD as well, and there is a document referred to as a preliminary plat of subdivision that also has to be voted on separately, so there's two things. So, again, so there is that 0-day requirement. So, you actually need to vote on the primary plan, Plan A tonight unless the developer indicates he would be willing to, they would be willing to waive that 0-day requirement. Now, as far as the alternate plan, again we don't have all of the required documentation on that plan. So, you really are not in a position, you really aren't able to vote on that plan tonight. So, if after you, and I would suggest that you may want to, as I

37 0 0 indicated in my memo, you may want to look at the commonalities of both plans. Both plans have the homes, the -foot street, the three-foot carriage walk, et cetera. You may want to discuss that and decide if you're amenable to the common pieces of it. Then if you are, then just talk about which of the entrance options you like. Then if you were to prefer the alternate entrance, again you're not going to be in a position to vote on that, unless the developer was willing to come back at a subsequent meeting with a revised, with all of the rest of it, the revised engineering, everything else that's required. If they were willing to do that, they would also need to, here at this meeting, waive the 0- day requirement and then you can vote on that in a subsequent meeting. But tonight you're not going to be able to vote on this alternate plan. MR. BERLINGHOF: So, fundamentally though, A and B are different even though they're only different by a small amount. MR. GUTIERREZ: The biggest difference, well, the difference is -- MR. BERLINGHOF: You've got the entrance and

38 0 0 you've got a couple of homes that have moved. The question is, fundamentally, we could vote on A, let's say for purposes of this discussion we voted A down, they could still come back with B which fundamentally has the same things as A except for a few changes, and we could still vote positively for B. MR. GUTIERREZ: You're really not able to vote on B because you don't have the -- MR. BERLINGHOF: No, that's my point. We vote on A, they come back with B -- MR. GUTIERREZ: Oh, a subsequent meeting, sure. But they would have to waive that 0-day requirement. MR. BERLINGHOF: So, B is not, because most of B is part of A. MR. GUTIERREZ: Yes. MR. DELOYS: If we vote down A, it would be a new application, they have to go through the process. MR. BERLINGHOF: Oh, yes, okay, I understand. MR. DELOYS: If it's voted down, they're voted down. MR. BERLINGHOF: No, I see, I didn't know they were two separate things.

39 0 0 MR. DELOYS: Yes. MR. BERLINGHOF: Yes, you may need to decide beforehand. If you wanted B, you might just say are you willing to postpone the vote, et cetera. MR. BERLINGHOF: Right. MR. BOLLING: So, now I'm confused. We need to vote tonight? MR. GUTIERREZ: Short of the developer saying, yes, we do, yes, period. Short of the developer indicating that they're willing to come back with all of the application requirements including the engineering on B, short of them saying that and indicating they're willing to waive the 0 days, okay, if that doesn't happen, then yes, you need to vote on A. MS. MENDREK: Okay. MR. RUBIN: Or if we don't vote, it expires? MR. BERLINGHOF: No, we have to vote on it. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Yes, we have to vote. Unless they want to waive the 0-day provision. MR. RUBIN: Right. MR. BERLINGHOF: All right, okay. Let's go ahead. MS. MENDREK: All right, I think I got it.

40 0 0 0 CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Petitioners, step forward, state your name and be sworn in. Anyone who may have any comments regarding this petition, all please stand up. MR. GUTIERREZ: Can we do the audience as well please? CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Yes, why don't we do that? Anyone, later on the audience is going to have an opportunity, so if you think you may have a comment or question, stand up, be sworn in now, and you will state your name when you step to the microphone. MR. GUTIERREZ: If you change your mind later, that's fine. Just let us know as you come up that you need to be worn. Otherwise we'll assume that you were sworn. (Witnesses sworn.) MR. GARRISON: All right. Just quickly before I get into the presentation, I wanted to just comment on the exchange that we just had there. CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Hang on one second. Your name please? MR. GARRISON: Sorry. My name is Matt Garrison with R Companies.

41 0 0 CHAIRMAN VASELOPULOS: Thank you. MR. GARRISON: On the exchange that we just had there, I understand kind of what you were saying, we can vote down A and we'll come back with B. The problem that we have is we've been at this for two years, and significant time and significant expense. But that's not even really the issue. We may be willing to spend more time and more expense. We have purchased five of these homes, we own them. The last two are owned by another individual, and he's been patient with us for the last two years as we've worked through this process. But we're running out of time with him and we're running out of his patience. If we don't go to a vote tonight and go to the Trustees in a couple of weeks, the lack of a decision will be a decision unfortunately. Likely the assemblage will break apart and we won't be able to have this conversation any further. So, I understand the logistics. But you know, fortunately or unfortunately, we need to bring this to some kind of a vote and get it to an up or down vote. I can tell you as the developer and the owner of five of these homes, this is a site that's choked off

42 0 0 from access that a lot of people in Northfield enjoy. I mean Bracken Lane has a nice left/right-turn lane. A median just went up for these seven houses here and they're just kind of, it's impacted the value. You can only turn out one way, it's dangerous. I'm going to show you some of that in my presentation. So, as a developer, we have every incentive to come back to you and add that left/rightturn lane later. We're willing to do that and we'll make some kind of commitment to do it. I don't know if you can vote it with it subject to us doing that. But if there is an inclination that, oh, we'll just wait and, you know, they'll come back in 0 or 0 days, unfortunately we don't have the luxury of doing that. So, I just wanted to let you guys know that in the context of the conversation we just had. So, again I'm Matt Garrison, I'm the CEO of R Companies. Happy to be here tonight. My architects and consultants and team are going to come up in a little bit with a detailed presentation on where we're at with the project. But before we do that, I just wanted to give a little bit of context to where we're at in this process and speak about why we think

43 0 0 this is a pretty special opportunity for Northfield and why we're here. Thanks to the Committee for being here and volunteering your time. Thanks to Steve and the Staff for working with us for the past two years in what's been a lengthy process. The neighbors, a lot of the familiar faces we've seen throughout this process, many of whom oppose us, and the opposition tends to be vocal and be the people who show up. But I wanted to let them know, as I said at the last meeting, that we respect their opinions and have tried to listen to them. The highest form of respect I think that we can pay is to listen to them and try and incorporate the feedback that we can into our project, and we've done that. We think the process has worked in terms of making a compromise in trying to create a win-win situation. But it can't be perfect. We can push and we can push to the limits of feasibility, but we can't push forever from a time standpoint or from an expenditure standpoint. We spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the last two years in architecture and in engineering in an effort to put this assemblage together and make it happen, and we think it's been an effective

44 process. 0 0 So, like I said a moment ago, I think it's time to make a decision if we can find the mechanism within the code to do that. The decision is do we want to improve this seven-acre site in the middle of Northfield that's got some structural issues that I'm going to get into tonight, access, water, light, traffic? These are things we can fix. Are we going to walk away from the opportunity and maybe in 0 or 0 more years someone puts it together again? That's the decision we have. So, I hope it's former and we can come to some kind of solution that allows us to make an investment in this site. Quickly, I just wanted to talk about R Companies. We probably don't look like the normal home builder that comes in here. But there's a reason that we're here. Reason number one is a lot of live in the area and drive up and down Willow all the time and are really familiar with this site and with Northfield. But reason number two and the primary reason is we want to find projects where we can create value by solving problems. That's why we're involved in this site, we want to solve problems at this site.

45 0 0 We've all driven by this site frequently. I've driven by it for years or however long I've been driving. But a lot of us probably haven't walked around the site, or been there right after a flood, or tried to pull our car out of one of the driveways and seen some of the structural issues with the site. Our opinion is that the site is not viable economically in its current form, and that it will continue to languish in its current form. So, we're here tonight to hopefully do something about that. We got involved in the project when I went to dinner at a friend's house four years ago who lives on the site. It's Pete, he's right over there and I think you'll hear from him later. That's him in the picture standing by the front door. Some of you guys who can't see the screen, we've handed out packets to you. But this is Pete's house and I went over there for dinner, and I'd never heard of the area. It was in this interesting little packet of Northfield where you think you know what it is and you try to go there and you drive right by the entrance because you can't even see the entrance, and then you do a U-turn

46 0 0 and turn around which you're not supposed to do. You know, that's what happens a lot there. I walked around the site with Pete, and Pete had purchased the house in a bank sale and a foreclosure. It was a distressed situation, he intended to fix it up. We're both real estate guys and we talked about what was going on with the site and ways we could fix it. It was interesting. If you look at the site map that I have up here, the neighborhood, Ingram in the R-, streets to the south have a nice urban, kind of suburban grid, and it just dead ends right into this site. In some cases there's cul-de-sacs, in some cases streets, literally just dead ends into the site. If you look on the second picture here, you can see the little white fence and stuff, that's just the street dead ending right into Pete's backyard. But this is a map of the site. You'll notice I have red font on the addresses on there, on three of the addresses. Those three addresses had been foreclosures within the last five years. So, three of the seven houses or 0 percent of the houses have been in financial distress and foreclosure in the last five years. The reason for that is there's a lot of problems

47 with the site. 0 0 It's become a little bit of a no man's land. It's cut off from the surrounding neighborhoods, and it's been further damaged and isolated by the Willow Road expansion. The median was just put in and there are six driveways that go to this site, and all six of those driveways were cut off from left/right access on Willow Road. There was always a dangerous situation that I'll talk about in a little bit. There's obviously flooding with the site. You can see the photos up there with the flooding. There is a significant watershed as the engineers have spoken about. It flows from Sunset Ridge down to this site, and this site takes on a lot of water. It flows to the site in a haphazard way and it's not necessarily engineered to handle it. A number of the houses flood and a large portion of the site floods as well. This further isolates the site. It makes it less likely that someone is going to invest in this site. By invest, I mean you can come in and fix the house up or buy a house, I don't know if someone will do it, let alone the type of investment that we're proposing tonight. It's old housing stock, you can see

48 0 0 the siding coming off the back of that house. There's a lot of kind of blight on the infrastructure. It's old housing stock, it's decaying and something needs to be done with. But the zoning map doesn't necessarily work to do something with the site, with the R- zoning. No one is going to probably come in and build a 0,000 square-foot, you know, $. million house on this site. That's not going to happen. It's too close to Willow Road, there's too many problems going on here in general with access to the site. So, the predictable result is that the site is blighted, and it's going to continue to get more blighted. We've had three foreclosures in the last five years of the seven houses. So, that's what we want to fix. The question is how do you fix it? I went home from Pete's house that night not thinking that I'd be able to fix it because it's very difficult to assemble seven properties like this so you can do something about it. Not only does it take someone like us who has the capital and the will to go through this for better or for worse, that's what we've done, but it takes seven willing homeowners that are

PLAN AND ZONING REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION

PLAN AND ZONING REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION PLAN AND ZONING REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMISSION REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had before the Village of Northfield Plan and Zoning

More information

PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION

PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMISSION REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had before the Village of Northfield Plan and Zoning Commission

More information

JANICE MENKING - Chair CHARLIE KIEHNE CHRIS KAISER STEVE THOMAS RON WOELLHOF JASON HELFRICH MATT LINES BJORN KIRCHDORFER

JANICE MENKING - Chair CHARLIE KIEHNE CHRIS KAISER STEVE THOMAS RON WOELLHOF JASON HELFRICH MATT LINES BJORN KIRCHDORFER STATE OF TEXAS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION COUNTY OF GILLESPIE December 7, 2011 CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG 5:30 P.M. On this the 7 th day of December, 2011, the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION convened in

More information

Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006

Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006 Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006 Transcription services generously donated by Willoughby Parks, Woolen Mills resident CPC Members:

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: AUGUST 19,

More information

1 PLANNING BOARD COUNTY OF ALBANY 3 *****************************************************

1 PLANNING BOARD COUNTY OF ALBANY 3 ***************************************************** 1 1 PLANNING BOARD COUNTY OF ALBANY 2 TOWN OF COLONIE 3 ***************************************************** 4 MABEY'S SELF STORAGE SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5 910 LOUDON ROAD SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW AND APPLICATION

More information

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 A regular meeting of the of the Borough of Madison was held on the 1st day of December 2015 at 7:30 P.M., in the Court

More information

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of March 25, :30 p.m.

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of March 25, :30 p.m. CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Present - Board of Appeals Members: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé Administration: Assistant

More information

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. October 15, 2012

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. October 15, 2012 CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Paul Sellman Dave Mail Diane Werner Elizabeth Howard Steve Balazs Arrived at 7:09 p.m. Heather Phile,

More information

MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Date: Time: 5:30 PM Place: Hoover Municipal Center Present: Mr. Mike Wood, Chairman Mr. Ron Harris Ms. Mari Morrison Mr. Kelly Bakane Mr. Allen

More information

CITY OF BOISE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING

CITY OF BOISE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT Rich Demarest, Chair Milt Gillespie, Vice-Chair Stephen Bradbury Douglas Gibson Jennifer Stevens Tamara Ansotegui Garrett Richardson (Student) III. REGULAR AGENDA CPA15-00008

More information

OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014

OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014 OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JUNE 12, 2014 Agenda MOPHIE, LLC -REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 37,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING

More information

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1 Page 1 CVA14-00030 / SCOTT STEWART Location: 1493 W. Saint Patrick Street VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE STREET-SIDE SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 2 FEET AND REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO APPROXIMATELY

More information

Cheryl Hannan: Is the applicant here? Could you please come up to the microphone and give your name and address for the record.

Cheryl Hannan: Is the applicant here? Could you please come up to the microphone and give your name and address for the record. The North Royalton Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on January 29, 2014, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 13834 Ridge Road, North Royalton, Ohio. Chairperson Cheryl Hannan called the meeting

More information

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION. Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION. Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway CALL TO ORDER MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX PLAN COMMISSION Held in the New Lenox Village Hall, 1 Veterans Parkway Tuesday, June 16, 2015 7:00 p.m. #15 6 B A regular meeting

More information

WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009

WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009 WHITE OAK BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES HELD JULY 2, 2009 Planning Commission Members Present: Al Lebedda Helen Stratigos Paul McCarthy Tony Villinger Glenn Beech Planning Commission Members

More information

SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8:00 P.M., JANUARY 2, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD

SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8:00 P.M., JANUARY 2, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS :00 P.M., JANUARY, PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD - - - - - Held at Suffield Township Fire Department Community Room Waterloo Road, Mogadore,

More information

Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie

Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting March 21, 2011 DRAFT Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie Tom Burgie Jack Centner Ken Hanvey, Chairman Brian Malotte Sandra Hulbert Mitch Makowski Joe Polimeni Scott

More information

PB 3/12/13 - Page 2 There is still 30, 33 parking spaces in that region over the -- spread out over the property that will be more than enough to -- t

PB 3/12/13 - Page 2 There is still 30, 33 parking spaces in that region over the -- spread out over the property that will be more than enough to -- t PB 3/12/13 - Page 1 CHILI PLANNING BOARD March 12, 2013 A meeting of the Chili Planning Board was held on March 12, 2013 at the Chili Town Hall, 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, New York 14624 at 7:00 p.m.

More information

MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval:

MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval: MUNSTER PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING Meeting Date: June 13, 2017 Date of Approval: Call to Order: A regular business meeting of the Munster Plan Commission was held in the Munster

More information

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. November 14,2011 MINUTES

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. November 14,2011 MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 14,2011 MINUTES The Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Philipstown held a work session on Monday, November 14, 2011, at the Philipstown Town Hall, 238 Main Street,

More information

Chairman, John Spooner opened the meeting at 6:03 PM and introduced the (3) members of the Zoning Board of Appeals which constitutes a quorum.

Chairman, John Spooner opened the meeting at 6:03 PM and introduced the (3) members of the Zoning Board of Appeals which constitutes a quorum. At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York, held at the Village Hall, East Aurora, New York on the 21 st day of May, 2015 PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman Michael

More information

Allie Brooks Dwight Johnson Linda Borgman Doris Lockhart Karon Epps Jeffrey Tanner Ted Greene. Mark Fountain

Allie Brooks Dwight Johnson Linda Borgman Doris Lockhart Karon Epps Jeffrey Tanner Ted Greene. Mark Fountain Minutes Regular Meeting of the Florence County Planning Commission Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. County Complex, Room 803 180 N. Irby St., Florence, South Carolina 29501 The Florence County Planning

More information

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018 DATE: October 17, 2018 APPROVED: November 14, 2018 TIME: 7:00 P.M. PLACE: Northville Township Hall 44405 Six Mile Road CALL TO ORDER:

More information

BRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2) BOORADY, ENGINEER AND ALEXANDER (FILLING IN FOR LORBER)

BRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2) BOORADY, ENGINEER AND ALEXANDER (FILLING IN FOR LORBER) MINUTES OF REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2015 Vice Chairman Zapf called to order the regular meeting of the Board and announced the meeting was duly advertised

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals Sheffield Lake, Ohio September 15, 2016

Zoning Board of Appeals Sheffield Lake, Ohio September 15, 2016 Zoning Board of Appeals Sheffield Lake, Ohio September 15, 2016 The meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held Thursday, September 15, 2016. Chairperson Diana Jancura called the meeting to order at

More information

William Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Wendy Potter-Behling, Secretary

William Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Wendy Potter-Behling, Secretary PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman John Pagliaccio Mary (Molly) Flynn Bruce Mitchell Michael (Mike) Croft At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York, held at the Village

More information

FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 13, 2013

FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 13, 2013 FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 13, 2013 Vice Chairman Decker called the Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting of to order at 7:30 p.m. He read the notice of the Open Public Meetings

More information

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. January 4, 2001

PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION. January 4, 2001 PLAINFIELD PLAN COMMISSION January 4, 2001 The Plainfield Plan Commission met on Thursday, January 4, 2001 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Brandgard, Mr. Thibo, Mr. Matrana, Mr. McPhail, Mr. Cavanaugh,

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES SEPTEMBER 3, :00 p.m.

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES SEPTEMBER 3, :00 p.m. 0 0 0 0 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES SEPTEMBER, 0 :00 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: John Villescas, Chairman Robert

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: APRIL 21, 2010 CASE NO.: 4/21/2010-4 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 APPLICANT: LOCATION: 5 M S REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC 33 NASHUA ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 33

More information

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m.

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m. PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, 2013 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Duffer: Good evening, I will now call to order the Plainfield Board of Zoning Appeals for February 21, 2013. ROLL CALL/DETERMINE

More information

Present: Bob Bacon Guests: Kevin & Michelle Webb

Present: Bob Bacon Guests: Kevin & Michelle Webb Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting June 24, 2015 APPROVED Present: Bob Bacon Guests: Kevin & Michelle Webb John Holtz Phil Sommer-Code Tom Burgie, Chairman Enforcement Officer Bert Crofton Jon Gage Absent:

More information

HOBOKEN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF HOBOKEN

HOBOKEN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF HOBOKEN HOBOKEN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF HOBOKEN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RE: REGULAR MEETING OF THE : Tuesday HOBOKEN ZONING BOARD OF : ADJUSTMENT : September, - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, 170 N. Main Kamas, UT 84036

MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, 170 N. Main Kamas, UT 84036 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MINUTES KAMAS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY, 01 :00 p.m. Kamas City Hall, N. Main Kamas, UT Mayor Marchant opened the meeting welcoming those in attendance: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

More information

City of Cape May Planning Board Meeting Minutes Tuesday December 10, 2013

City of Cape May Planning Board Meeting Minutes Tuesday December 10, 2013 City of Cape May Planning Board Meeting Minutes Tuesday December 10, 2013 Opening: The meeting of the City of Cape May Planning Board was called to order by Chairman William Bezaire, at 7:00 PM. In compliance

More information

1 P age T own of Wappinger ZBA Minute

1 P age T own of Wappinger ZBA Minute 1 P age T own of Wappinger ZBA Minute 9-8 - 15 MINUTES Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals September 8, 2015 Time: 7:00PM Town Hall 20 Middlebush Road Wappinger Falls, NY Summarized Minutes Members:

More information

2 OFFICE OF THE OTTAWA COUNTY WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER. 8 Proceedings commenced at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday,

2 OFFICE OF THE OTTAWA COUNTY WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER. 8 Proceedings commenced at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 1 1 STATE OF MICHIGAN 2 OFFICE OF THE OTTAWA COUNTY WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER 3 4 IN THE MATTER OF: 5 GREEN ACRES DRAIN 6 / 7 8 Proceedings commenced at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 9 June 8, 2016, at the

More information

Meridian City Council March 29, 2016

Meridian City Council March 29, 2016 A meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday,, by Mayor Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Mayor Tammy de Weerd, Keith Bird, Joe Borton, Ty Palmer, Anne Little Roberts

More information

ZBA 1/22/19 - Page 1

ZBA 1/22/19 - Page 1 ZBA 1/22/19 - Page 1 CHILI ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS January 22, 2019 A meeting of the Chili Zoning Board was held on January 22, 2019 at the Chili Town Hall, 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, New York 14624

More information

TOWN OF MANLIUS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 16, 2016

TOWN OF MANLIUS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 16, 2016 Zoning Board of Appeals June 16, 2016 TOWN OF MANLIUS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 16, 2016 The Town of Manlius Zoning Board of Appeals met in the Manlius Town Hall, 301 Brooklea Dr. Ftteville NY at 7:00

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH P.O. BOX 898 WINDHAM, NH 03087

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH P.O. BOX 898 WINDHAM, NH 03087 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: MAY 20,

More information

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of November 20, :30 p.m.

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of November 20, :30 p.m. CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Board of Appeals Members Present: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé, Tom Smeader Administration:

More information

Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016

Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016 Francis City Planning Commission Meeting Thursday August 18, 2016 7:00 PM 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT 84036 Present: Chair Kevin Cannon, Commissioner Trent Handsaker, Commissioner Shauna

More information

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three Creating Solutions for Our Future HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

More information

Minutes of the Salem City Council Meeting held on March 19, 2008 in the Salem City Council Chambers.

Minutes of the Salem City Council Meeting held on March 19, 2008 in the Salem City Council Chambers. Minutes of the Salem City Council Meeting held on March 19, 2008 in the Salem City Council Chambers. Work Session: Nancy Hardman, from CUWCD, came and discussed water conservation to the council. Miss

More information

OCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 24, 2012

OCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 24, 2012 OCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 24, 2012 Chairman Widdis called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. and announced that the meeting had been advertised in accordance with the Open Public Meetings

More information

TREMONTON CITY CORPORATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 3, 2009 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

TREMONTON CITY CORPORATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 3, 2009 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Members Present: David Deakin Roger Fridal Lyle Holmgren Jeff Reese Byron Wood Max Weese, Mayor Shawn Warnke, City Manager Darlene Hess, Recorder TREMONTON CITY CORPORATION CITY COUNCIL MEETING September

More information

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 19, 2009 The Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) of the City of Titusville, Florida met for a regular session in the Council Chamber of City Hall,

More information

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING April 18, Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING April 18, Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Elizabeth Howard Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton Bridget Susel, Community Development

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY 1, :00 p.m.

REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY 1, :00 p.m. 0 0 0 0 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY, 0 :00 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: John Villescas, Chairman Robert Hearn,

More information

MINUTES PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION

MINUTES PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION December 11, 2001 A regular meeting of the Pittsburg Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Holmes at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday,

More information

SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 18, 2015

SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 18, 2015 SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 18, 2015 Call to Order: Chairperson Wendt called the March 18, 2015 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to order at 7:30pm at the Springfield Township Civic

More information

GEORGIA PLANNING COMMISSION May 1, :00 pm

GEORGIA PLANNING COMMISSION May 1, :00 pm GEORGIA PLANNING COMMISSION May 1, 2018 7:00 pm Board Members Present: Peter Pembroke, Suzanna Brown, Tony Heinlein, Maurice Fitzgerald, and Lary Martell. Absent: George Bilodeau Staff Present: Ryan Bell,

More information

Village of Crete Zoning Board of Appeals/ Plan Commission Meeting Minutes. June 11, 2015

Village of Crete Zoning Board of Appeals/ Plan Commission Meeting Minutes. June 11, 2015 Village of Crete Zoning Board of Appeals/ Plan Commission Meeting Minutes June 11, 2015 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Tellef called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Tellef, Madsen,

More information

Tooele City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes

Tooele City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes Tooele City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Tooele City Hall, Large Conference Room 90 North Main St., Tooele, Utah City Council Members Present:

More information

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING 2 APPEALS OF HENRICO COUNTY, HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 3 BUILDING IN THE GOVERNMENT CENTER AT PARHAM AND HUNGARY 4 SPRING ROADS, ON THURSDAY

More information

CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. May 9, 2013

CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE. May 9, 2013 CITY OF NORWALK PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE PRESENT: Jill Jacobson, Chair; Adam Blank; Harry Rilling; Joseph Santo; Michael O Reilly STAFF: OTHERS: Mike Wrinn; Dori Wilson; Frank Strauch Atty. Liz Suchy; Kate

More information

Historic District Commission January 22, 2015 City of Hagerstown, Maryland

Historic District Commission January 22, 2015 City of Hagerstown, Maryland Michael Gehr, chair, called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 22, 2015, in the Conference Room, Fourth Floor, City Hall. A roster of the members of the commission and the technical

More information

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. June 27, 2016

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. June 27, 2016 URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES The Urbandale Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on Monday,, at the Urbandale City Hall, 3600 86 th Street. Chairperson Wayne Van Heuvelen

More information

GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL. October 17, :35 p.m. MINUTES

GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL. October 17, :35 p.m. MINUTES GREENWOOD CITY COUNCIL October 17, 2005-5:35 p.m. MINUTES PRESENT Council Members: Mayor Nicholson, Niki Hutto, Linda Edwards, Betty Boles, Herbert Vaughn, Johnny Williams, and Barbara Turnburke; City

More information

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING November 21, Benjamin Tipton Paul Sellman Elizabeth Howard

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING November 21, Benjamin Tipton Paul Sellman Elizabeth Howard CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBER ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Dave Mail Benjamin Tipton Paul Sellman Elizabeth Howard Jona Burton Heather Phile,

More information

Michael Bullen. 5:31pm. Okay. So thanks Paul. Look I'm not going to go through the spiel I went through at the public enquiry meeting.

Michael Bullen. 5:31pm. Okay. So thanks Paul. Look I'm not going to go through the spiel I went through at the public enquiry meeting. Council: Delegate: Michael Bullen. Venue: Date: February 16 Time: 5:31pm 5 Okay. So thanks Paul. Look I'm not going to go through the spiel I went through at the public enquiry meeting. No, I'm sure you've

More information

OMEGA REAL ESTATE, LLC, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A DISTANCE OF LESS THAN 200 FEET OF THE NEAREST PORTION OF A DWELLING

OMEGA REAL ESTATE, LLC, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A DISTANCE OF LESS THAN 200 FEET OF THE NEAREST PORTION OF A DWELLING 1 STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF TRUMBULL LORDSTOWN VILLAGE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, MAY 13, 2013, AT 5:30 P.M. IN RE: CASE NO. 13 02 OMEGA REAL ESTATE, LLC, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO

More information

MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Meeting of July 21, 2008

MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Meeting of July 21, 2008 Page 1 of 5 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Meeting of The of the, Texas met on MONDAY, July 21, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. in the Turk Cannady/Cedar Hill Room, 285 Uptown Blvd. Building 100, Cedar Hill,

More information

ELK RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 4, 2007

ELK RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 4, 2007 ELK RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 4, 2007 TIME AND PLACE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROLL CALL OPENING REMARKS & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA A regular meeting of the Elk Ridge

More information

BRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, FOREMAN, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2)

BRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, FOREMAN, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2) MINUTES OF REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 Vice Chairman Zapf called to order the regular meeting of the Board and announced the meeting was duly advertised in

More information

KIRTLAND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. October 16, 2017

KIRTLAND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES. October 16, 2017 KIRTLAND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 16, 2017 The meeting of Kirtland City Council was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Council President Pro Tempore Robert Skrbis. Mr. Schulz led the prayer which followed

More information

BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, :00 P.M.

BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, :00 P.M. BOONE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BOONE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOONE COUNTY FISCAL COURTROOM BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 9, 2016 6:00 P.M. Mr. Whitton called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JUNE 3, 2002

REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JUNE 3, 2002 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS JUNE 3, 2002 MEMBERS PRESENT: The Board of Directors of the City of Texarkana, Arkansas, convened in regular session at 7:00

More information

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS. August 8, :30 p.m.

CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS. August 8, :30 p.m. CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS 7:30 p.m. Present: Board of Appeals Members: Glen Goist, Ken Evans, Bill Harr, Rich Baldin, Celia McGrath. Administration: Assistant

More information

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1602, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. 0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at 0, February.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties present before the recess are again present. Defense Counsel, you may call

More information

TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL:

TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL: APPROVED 10/15/08 TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL: PRESENT: Chair Marilyn VanMillon Member George Wittman

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH LOUIS DE LA FLOR 116-B ROCKINGHAM ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH LOUIS DE LA FLOR 116-B ROCKINGHAM ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: JULY

More information

CITY OF NORTHFIELD WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 27, 2018

CITY OF NORTHFIELD WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 27, 2018 At 6:02pm this meeting was called to order by Municipal Clerk Mary Canesi. This meeting was properly advertised in the Press of Atlantic City on January 13, 2018, in accordance with Public Law 75, Chapter

More information

Chairman Sandora: Please stand for the Opening Ceremony, the Pledge of Allegiance.

Chairman Sandora: Please stand for the Opening Ceremony, the Pledge of Allegiance. The North Royalton Planning Commission met in the North Royalton Council Chambers, 13834 Ridge Road, on Wednesday, April 6, 2011, to hold a Public Hearing. Chairman Tony Sandora called the meeting to order

More information

City of Clermont MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 3, Page 1

City of Clermont MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 3, Page 1 Page 1 The meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. by Chairwoman Cuqui Whitehead. Other members present were William Henning, Jr., Bernadette Dubuss, Raymond

More information

MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH

MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH The Garden City Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on Thursday, August 27, 2009 at the Garden City Lakeview Center located

More information

PB 8/12/14 - Page 2 really clear access to the ATM in there. We could move that entrance a little bit more to the north. You know, we don't really nee

PB 8/12/14 - Page 2 really clear access to the ATM in there. We could move that entrance a little bit more to the north. You know, we don't really nee PB 8/12/14 - Page 1 CHILI PLANNING BOARD August 12, 2014 A meeting of the Chili Planning Board was held on August 12, 2014 at the Chili Town Hall, 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, New York 14624 at 7:00 p.m.

More information

3. Discussion and/or action to add one member (citizen) to the Public Works Committee.

3. Discussion and/or action to add one member (citizen) to the Public Works Committee. Public Works Committee meeting October 6, 2010 4pm Present: Richard G. Harris Mayor Annette Spendlove City Recorder/ HR Director Dave Hulme Planning Commissioner Jim Harris Project Manager Mel Blanchard

More information

CITY OF COUNTRYSIDE East Avenue Countryside, IL Meeting Minutes

CITY OF COUNTRYSIDE East Avenue Countryside, IL Meeting Minutes CITY OF COUNTRYSIDE 5550 East Avenue Countryside, IL 60525 www.countryside-il.org Meeting Minutes Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission Zoning Board of Appeals Tuesday, April 5, 2016 7:15 PM City Hall

More information

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T August 27, 2014 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DETAILS: ZA14-023 Preliminary Plat for Silver Ridge Addition Phase III The applicant

More information

Francis City Council Meeting Thursday, July 13, :00 p.m. Francis City Community Center 2319 So. Spring Hollow Rd. Francis, Utah 84036

Francis City Council Meeting Thursday, July 13, :00 p.m. Francis City Community Center 2319 So. Spring Hollow Rd. Francis, Utah 84036 Francis City Council Meeting Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:00 p.m. Francis City Community Center 2319 So. Spring Hollow Rd. Francis, Utah 84036 Attending: Mayor R. Lee Snelgrove, Councilmembers Byron Ames,

More information

COUNCIL MEETING CONT. APRIL 19, 2012 PAGE 136

COUNCIL MEETING CONT. APRIL 19, 2012 PAGE 136 COUNCIL MEETING CONT. APRIL 19, 2012 PAGE 136 MINUTES OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 19, 2012 AT THE CIVIC CENTER, 83 WEST MAIN, HYRUM, UTAH. CONVENED: 6:34 p.m. CONDUCTING: Mayor W. Dean

More information

BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES

BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES BANNER ELK PLANNING BOARD AND LAND USE UPDATE COMMITTEE JOINT MEETING, 04 JANUARY 2010 MINUTES Members Present: Buster Burleson, John Collier, Dan Hemp, Paul Lehmann, Dawn Sellars, Ann Swinkola, Penny

More information

St. Vincent Martyr Church, Madison, NJ

St. Vincent Martyr Church, Madison, NJ Design Vision for St. Vincent Martyr Church, Madison, NJ JAMES HUNDT LITURGICAL DESIGN CONSULTANT 426 State Street, 3 rd Floor Schenectady, New York (518) 372-3655 THE EXISTING SPACE The current worship

More information

FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400

FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400 0001 1 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400 EAST LOCUST STREET 6 UNION, MISSOURI 63084 7 8 9 TRANSCRIPT

More information

Mr. Oatney called the meeting to order and explained the procedures of the meeting.

Mr. Oatney called the meeting to order and explained the procedures of the meeting. The Zoning Board of Appeals met on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:00 pm in the Lancaster City Schools Education Service Center, 111 S Broad Street, Lancaster, Ohio. Members present were Tim Oatney, Preston

More information

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. March 15, 2004

TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. March 15, 2004 TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS March 15, 2004 The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Monday, March 15, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Monnett, Mr. Blevins, Mr. Shrum, Mr. Haase and Mr.

More information

MEETING OF THE HIGHWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

MEETING OF THE HIGHWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEETING OF THE HIGHWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:30 p.m. Meeting Meeting will be held at Highwood City Hall 17 Highwood Avenue - Highwood, Illinois I. CALL TO ORDER

More information

Commissioner Fadness - Is there a calendar date time limit on the CUP to ensure that the parking lot does not stay a parking lot.

Commissioner Fadness - Is there a calendar date time limit on the CUP to ensure that the parking lot does not stay a parking lot. CUP08-00027 & CVA08-00008 / YMCA-TREASURE VALLEY / DAVID DURO Location: 1102 w. Hays Street REQUEST APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR A TEMPORARY OFF- SITE PARKING LOT LOCATED IN AN R-3D/CD AND R-3HD/CD

More information

Page 1 of 6 Champlin City Council

Page 1 of 6 Champlin City Council Minutes of the Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Champlin in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota Pursuant to Due Call and Notice Thereof Regular Session August 11, 2014 Municipal

More information

Meeting of the Planning Commission July 11, 2017 Custer County Courthouse Westcliffe, Colorado

Meeting of the Planning Commission July 11, 2017 Custer County Courthouse Westcliffe, Colorado Meeting of the Planning Commission July 11, 2017 Custer County Courthouse Westcliffe, Colorado Present: Planning Commission: Vic Barnes, Patrick Lynch, Keith Hood, Pat Bailey, Bill Donley and Dale Mullen

More information

OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, :00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL

OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, :00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL OAK RIDGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 7:00 P.M. OAK RIDGE TOWN HALL MINUTES Members Present Ron Simpson, Chair Bobbi Baker, Vice Chair Nancy Stoudemire Steve Wilson Larry Stafford

More information

TOWN OF BEDFORD May 15, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES

TOWN OF BEDFORD May 15, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES TOWN OF BEDFORD May 15, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES A regular meeting of the Bedford Zoning Board of Adjustment was held on Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 7:00 PM in the Bedford Meeting Room, 10

More information

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page Page 1 Transcription Hyderabad Discussion of Motions Friday, 04 November 2016 at 13:45 IST Note: Although the transcription is largely accurate, in some cases it is incomplete or inaccurate due to inaudible

More information

FRANCIS CITY Planning Commission Meeting. Wednesday April 24, Recreational Building 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT

FRANCIS CITY Planning Commission Meeting. Wednesday April 24, Recreational Building 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT FRANCIS CITY Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday April 24, 2013 Recreational Building 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT The Francis City Planning Commission convened in regular session Wednesday,

More information

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING FEBRUARY 18, :00 P.M.

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING FEBRUARY 18, :00 P.M. FEBRUARY 18, 2014 7:00 P.M. I CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. II ROLL CALL Members Present: Carolyn Ghantous, Joe Ramirez, Lawrence Hawkins III, Dave Nienaber, Ed Knox,

More information

MINUTES OF TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF THE TOWN OF STALLINGS, NORTH CAROLINA

MINUTES OF TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF THE TOWN OF STALLINGS, NORTH CAROLINA MINUTES OF TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF THE TOWN OF STALLINGS, NORTH CAROLINA The Town Council of the Town of Stallings met for its regular meeting on November 28, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. at the Stallings Town Hall,

More information

Planning Board Meeting Monday, August 10, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall at 7:00 PM. MINUTES Approved 8/24/2015

Planning Board Meeting Monday, August 10, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall at 7:00 PM. MINUTES Approved 8/24/2015 Planning Board Meeting Monday, August 10, 2015 Council Chambers, City Hall at 7:00 PM MINUTES Approved 8/24/2015 I. Roll Call Present: David Putnam, James Short, Victor Bergeron, Bruce Kolenda, Neil Ward,

More information