Paradox of Composite Objects
|
|
- Randall Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Paradox of Composite Objects
2 Composition The Special Composition Question Given some x s, what must be the case for them to compose a y? We all believe in things that are made up of smaller things, like a chair that has legs, a seat, and a back as parts. This naturally raises the question, when should we think that some things are parts of a bigger thing, and when should we think they are just separate objects? The x s just refers to any things, be they people, trees, legos, cells, leptons, etc. y is whatever we want it to be, such as an army, a forest, an x-wing, an organism, a molecule, etc. The SCQ thus helps to precisely ask, when (or in what circumstances) does composition occur?
3 Examples of Composition Questions If the French Foreign Legion pushes some sand to make bunkers, have they made something, or merely rearranged the things that were already there? For that matter, is there even a French Foreign Legion? If someone builds something out of legos, when have they actually made something? When the first two pieces are connected? When it looks like the final product? When they are done building? Is a hunk of stone an object, or is it merely some particles that happen to be attached? In either case, when has a sculptor made something with that hunk of stone? When do trees make up a forests? Can a forest be split into two forests?
4 Composition The Special Composition Question Given some x s, what must be the case for them to compose a y? There are three important answers to this question which can be used as reference points: Nihilism There is only one x. Contact The x s are in contact. Universalism Nothing Nihilism says there are no composite objects. Only simple, small, sub-atomic particles exist. Universalism, says that for any objects whatsoever there is a composite object. Thus, there are forests, trout-turkeys, and combinations of my left pinkie and the Eiffel tower.
5 The Special Composition Question Given some x s, what must be the case for them to compose a y? Contact says that objects compose something if and only if they are in contact. This has some highly implausible results, which we should discuss, but it is meant only as an example of how we could give a middle answer in between the two extremes of Nihilism and Universalism. The nice thing about Contact is that it affirms the existence of people while denying the existence of trout-turkeys and other weird things One can however object that it excludes things it should include like schools, armies, forests, clubs, and other separated things. One can also object that it includes things it shouldn t like the combination of you and the chair, the combination of two people when they shake hands, etc. One of the main challenges of the SCQ is finding an answer that seems to get these inuitive cases mostly right.
6 Other Answers Lots of people have attempted to specify when objects compose things. Some suggestion include: The x s are connected and are disposed to stay connected. When the activity of the x s constitutes a life. When the x s have causal powers that are not the sum of the causal powers of the individual x s When there is a collective term for the x s And many more...
7 The Problem for Medium Answers Most people think that the answer to the Special Composition Question has to be somewhere between Nihilism and Universalism. However, any medium answer seems to face a sorites paradox For instance, if spatial proximity is important for composition, we can imagine you, and a scenario in which every quark, lepton, and other particle composing you is spread to the farthest reaches of the universe. Those two scenarios are connected by a very long series of circumstances in which the only difference between two circumstances in that series is that one particle is moved on nanometer.
8 The Problem for Medium Answers As we have seen, there are lots of Sorites paradoxes out there. What is unique about this one, is that it seems to be able to be stated without any vague language whatsoever Suppose for the sake of simplicity that there is a composite object composed of two things and that it is the only thing in the universe. Then either of the following two statements is sufficient to define when composition occurs: (1) There are exactly 3 things. (2) There is an it x an it y and an it z such that it x is not identical to it y, it y is not identical to it z, and it x is not identical to it z ( x,y,z x y, y z, x z). If (1) or (2) goes from false to true, then composition has occurred, but neither one has any vague terms, so stating whether or not composition occurs is not vague.
9 The Problem for Medium Answers We can summarize this problem in the following argument: 1. If composition sometimes but not always occurs, then there is a continuous series of situations connecting situations in which composition occurs to situations in which composition does not occur. 2. If X occurs at one point in a continuous series and not at another, then either there are two arbitrarily similar situations which are such that X occurs at one and not at the other, or there are situations at which it is vague whether or not X is occurs. 3. There are no arbitrarily similar situations which are such that composition occurs at one and not at the other. 4. Therefore, if composition sometimes but not always occurs, there are situations at which it is vague whether or not composition has occurred. (1, 2, 3) 5. It is never vague whether or not composition has occurred. C. Therefore, composition either always occurs or never occurs. (4, 5)
10 Option 1: Accept Nihilism One option is always just to accept the conclusion by denying composite objects there are only fundamental particles arranged in various ways For a lot of seemingly composite things we want to talk about, it makes sense to view the language of the composite as just a shorthand way of expressing something about the various parts. For instance, when we say the marching band formed an aircraft carrier, it kinda seems like we are saying that one band member was a spot 1, one was at spot 2, etc. such that together their positioning represented the shape of an aircraft carrier The point is, the actions of a band seem to be nothing more than the actions of the various members of the band While some people will already be dissatisfied with this analysis, the biggest problem for the analysis is that it does not seem like we can say a similar thing for you and I talking about the things I do is not a veiled way of talking about the things my various cells do.
11 Option 2: Accept Universalism A different way to accept the conclusion is to accept that any combination of things is a composite object including trout-turkeys, pinky-eiffel Towers, and the rest While this is incredibly un-intuitive in general, it also has trouble making sense of the existence of composite human persons Consider the problem of whether or not there is a cloud in the sky: Think of a cloud just one cloud, and around it a clear blue sky. Seen from the ground, the cloud may seem to have a sharp boundary. Not so. The cloud is a swarm of water droplets. At the outskirts of the cloud, the density of the droplets falls off. Eventually they are so few and far between that we may hesitate to say that the outlying droplets are still part of the cloud at all; perhaps we might better say only that they are near the cloud. But the transition is gradual. Many surfaces are equally good candidates to be the boundary of the cloud. Therefore many aggregates of droplets, some more inclusive and some less inclusive (and some inclusive in different ways than others), are equally good candidates to be the cloud. Since they have equal claim, how can we say that the cloud is one of these aggregates rather than another? But if all of them count as clouds, then we have many clouds rather than one. And if none of them count, each one being ruled out because of the competition from the others, then we have no cloud. How is it, then, that we have just one cloud? And yet we do. (Lewis 1993: 164)
12 Option 2: Accept Universalism The problem of the borders of the cloud is known as the Problem of the Many Importantly, it primarily seems to arise if we accept Universalism Also importantly, it seems to apply to humans Consider one dead skin cell on you which is sort of attached to the rest. Given universalism, there is one composite object that includes that dead skin cell, and one that does not. Which one is you? Ramping up, it seems like if we accept Universalism we have to accept that there are in fact millions of humans in the general vicinity of you, but this is absurd. It can t be the case that millions of people think, I want a cup of coffee ; then those same millions all simultaneously stand up and walk over to the coffee pot.
13 We can thus expand the paradox: 1. If composition sometimes but not always occurs, then there is a continuous series of situations connecting situations in which composition occurs to situations in which composition does not occur. 2. If X occurs at one point in a continuous series and not at another, then either there are two arbitrarily similar situations which are such that X occurs at one and not at the other, or there are situations at which it is vague whether or not X is occurs. 3. There are no arbitrarily similar situations which are such that composition occurs at one and not at the other. 4. Therefore, if composition sometimes but not always occurs, there are situations at which it is vague whether or not composition has occurred. (1, 2, 3) 5. It is never vague whether or not composition has occurred. 6. Therefore, composition either always occurs or never occurs. (4, 5) 7. I am a unique, composite object. 8. If I am a unique composite object, then composition occurs sometimes but not always. 9. Composition occurs sometimes but not always (7, 8)
14 Option 3: Accept Vague Existence (or Vague Identity) There are two different ways of stating when composition occurs, and the only thing they have in common is that they talk about existence. If the problem is linguistic vagueness, one could try to say that the word exists or the words there is or there are are vague. However, these words seem to just be the broadest generic category there can be. If something can be referred to, or if there are more than 0 of that thing, or if it could be what is meant by a pronoun, we just say there is that thing, so how could that be vague either it is there to be referred to, or it isn t The only other way to say that it is linguistic vagueness is to say that both identity and numbers are vague, which is difficult
15 Option 4: Make Sense of a Sharp Cutoff The remaining option is to give a theory of composition which makes composition non-problematic. One way to do this is to say that the difference between composition and non-composition is based on something that cannot be put into a Sorites paradox It is, however, hard to find any physical facts about the world which cannot be put into a Sorites The other way to do this is to say that two arbitrarily similar situations are such that one contains a composite object and the other does not. However, it strongly seems like there needs to be a reason for thinking of two situations differently.
Composition. Question: Did you say that there were some bigger triangles COMPOSED of littler ones?
Composition 1. Composition: Brain Teaser: How many squares do you see in the picture on the left? How many triangles in the picture on the right? (Answers are on the last page) Question: Did you say that
More informationThe Problem of Identity and Mereological Nihilism. the removal of an assumption of unrestricted mereological composition, and from there a
1 Bradley Mattix 24.221 5/13/15 The Problem of Identity and Mereological Nihilism Peter Unger s problem of the many discussed in The Problem of the Many and Derek Parfit s fission puzzle put forth in Reasons
More informationWhat is real? Heaps, bald things, and tall things
What is real? Heaps, bald things, and tall things Our topic today is another paradox which has been known since ancient times: the paradox of the heap, also called the sorites paradox ( sorites is Greek
More informationAgainst the Vagueness Argument TUOMAS E. TAHKO ABSTRACT
Against the Vagueness Argument TUOMAS E. TAHKO ABSTRACT In this paper I offer a counterexample to the so called vagueness argument against restricted composition. This will be done in the lines of a recent
More informationResponses to the sorites paradox
Responses to the sorites paradox phil 20229 Jeff Speaks April 21, 2008 1 Rejecting the initial premise: nihilism....................... 1 2 Rejecting one or more of the other premises....................
More informationThe paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!
The Sorites Paradox The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:! Height Sorites 1) Someone who is 7 feet in height
More informationThe paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument:
The sorites paradox The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument: 1. Someone who is 7 feet in height is tall.
More informationVague objects with sharp boundaries
Vague objects with sharp boundaries JIRI BENOVSKY 1. In this article I shall consider two seemingly contradictory claims: first, the claim that everybody who thinks that there are ordinary objects has
More informationDO WE NEED A THEORY OF METAPHYSICAL COMPOSITION?
1 DO WE NEED A THEORY OF METAPHYSICAL COMPOSITION? ROBERT C. OSBORNE DRAFT (02/27/13) PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION I. Introduction Much of the recent work in contemporary metaphysics has been
More informationCAN LIFE BE A CRITERION OF PERSISTENCE THROUGH TIME? A DISCUSSION OF SOME ONTOLOGICAL THESIS BY PETER VAN INWAGEN
CAN LIFE BE A CRITERION OF PERSISTENCE THROUGH TIME? A DISCUSSION OF SOME ONTOLOGICAL THESIS BY PETER VAN INWAGEN Carlo Conni Saint Raphael University of Milan, Italy This work is centered upon some of
More informationThe Paradoxes of Material Constitution
The Paradoxes of Material Constitution A huge portion of things we say will involve talking about medium-sized material objects stuff like table, chairs, buildings, trees, footballs, guitars, squirrels,
More informationUniversals. If no: Then it seems that they could not really be similar. If yes: Then properties like redness are THINGS.
Universals 1. Introduction: Things cannot be in two places at once. If my cat, Precious, is in my living room, she can t at exactly the same time also be in YOUR living room! But, properties aren t like
More informationRestricted Composition
A version of this paper appears in John Hawthorne, Theodore Sider, and Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics (Basil Blackwell, 2008), pp. 341-363. Restricted Composition Ned Markosian
More informationPhilip Goff The Phenomenal Bonding Solution to the Combination Problem
Philip Goff The Phenomenal Bonding Solution to the Combination Problem I The high probability of panpsychism Panpsychism, the view that fundamental physical entities are conscious, is a highly probable
More informationThe Supersubstantivalist Response to the Argument from Vagueness
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2013 The Supersubstantivalist Response to the Argument from Vagueness Mark Puestohl University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
More informationConstitution 1 Theodore Sider
Constitution 1 Theodore Sider The antinomy of constitution It is impossible to hold just one material object an ice cube, or a soda can, or a clay statue in one s hand. Wherever there appears to be only
More informationDestruction, Alteration, Simples, and World-Stuff
Destruction, Alteration, Simples, and World-Stuff Suppose that a tree is chopped down and run through a wood chipper, or that a sweater is unraveled. The matter of the tree still exists, as does the matter
More informationVAGUENESS. Francis Jeffry Pelletier and István Berkeley Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
VAGUENESS Francis Jeffry Pelletier and István Berkeley Department of Philosophy University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Vagueness: an expression is vague if and only if it is possible that it give
More informationA version of this paper appears in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2015), pp THE RIGHT STUFF. Ned Markosian
A version of this paper appears in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2015), pp. 665-687. THE RIGHT STUFF Ned Markosian This paper argues for including stuff in one s ontology. The distinction between
More informationProperties. If no: Then it seems that they could not really be similar. If yes: Then properties like redness are THINGS.
Properties Things cannot be in two places at once. If my cat, Precious, is in my living room, she can t at exactly the same time also be in YOUR living room! But, properties aren t like that. If I have
More informationWhat am I? An immaterial thing: the case for dualism
What am I? An immaterial thing: the case for dualism Today we turn to our third big question: What are you? We can focus this question a little bit by introducing the idea of a physical or material thing.
More informationPersonal Identity Through Time
Personal Identity Through Time Personal Identity Given a person A at one time and a person B at a different time, what must be the case for A and B to be the same person? We connect a lot of things to
More informationThe Argument from Vagueness for Modal Parts
The Argument from Vagueness for Modal Parts Abstract. It has been argued by some that the Argument from Vagueness is one of the strongest arguments in favor of the theory of temporal parts. I will neither
More informationMetaphysical Language, Ordinary Language and Peter van Inwagen s Material Beings *
Commentary Metaphysical Language, Ordinary Language and Peter van Inwagen s Material Beings * Peter van Inwagen Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1990 Daniel Nolan** daniel.nolan@nottingham.ac.uk Material
More information(Some More) Vagueness
(Some More) Vagueness Otávio Bueno Department of Philosophy University of Miami Coral Gables, FL 33124 E-mail: otaviobueno@mac.com Three features of vague predicates: (a) borderline cases It is common
More informationIn Defense of Existence Monism
Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Spring 5-1-2011 In Defense of Existence Monism Peter Finocchiaro Follow
More informationFinding God through Unexpected Conversations. John 4: 1-30; 39-42
Finding God through Unexpected Conversations John 4: 1-30; 39-42 Have you ever had a conversation that changed your life? Ask anyone this question and I am sure that we would get a variety of answers,
More informationContents. Acknowledgments
Comp. by: Jaganathan Stage : Proof ChapterID: 0002568929 Date:25/7/15 Time:17:38:52 Filepath:d:/womat-filecopy/0002568929.3D Dictionary : OUP_UKdictionary 7 OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF FIRST PROOF, 25/7/2015,
More information8. The Mental Problems of the Many
8. The Mental Problems of the Many Peter Unger Many years ago, I blush to recall, I published some arguments against the existence of all sorts of commonly supposed entities against rocks and desks, plants
More informationTruthmakers for Negative Existentials
Truthmakers for Negative Existentials 1. Introduction: We have already seen that absences and nothings cause problems for philosophers. Well, they re an especially huge problem for truthmaker theorists.
More informationThe Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion
24.251: Philosophy of Language Paper 2: S.A. Kripke, On Rules and Private Language 21 December 2011 The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages,
More informationNow consider a verb - like is pretty. Does this also stand for something?
Kripkenstein The rule-following paradox is a paradox about how it is possible for us to mean anything by the words of our language. More precisely, it is an argument which seems to show that it is impossible
More informationA note on Bishop s analysis of the causal argument for physicalism.
1. Ontological physicalism is a monist view, according to which mental properties identify with physical properties or physically realized higher properties. One of the main arguments for this view is
More informationSider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument
This is a draft. The final version will appear in Philosophical Studies. Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument ABSTRACT: The Vagueness Argument for universalism only works if you think there
More informationMereological Nihilism and the Special Arrangement Question
Mereological Nihilism and the Special Arrangement Question Andrew Brenner Penultimate version of paper. Final version of paper published in Synthese, May 2015, Volume 192, Issue 5, pp 1295-1314 Contents
More informationVagueness and supervaluations
Vagueness and supervaluations UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane 1 Supervaluations We saw two problems with the three-valued approach: 1. sharp boundaries 2. counterintuitive consequences
More informationEliminativism and gunk
Eliminativism and gunk JIRI BENOVSKY Abstract: Eliminativism about macroscopic material objects claims that we do not need to include tables in our ontology, and that any job practical or theoretical they
More informationIn defence of an argument for Evans s principle: a rejoinder to Vahid
In defence of an argument for Evans s principle: a rejoinder to Vahid JOHN N. WILLIAMS In (2004) I gave an argument for Evans s principle: namely: Whatever justifies me in believing that p also justifies
More informationBeyond Symbolic Logic
Beyond Symbolic Logic 1. The Problem of Incompleteness: Many believe that mathematics can explain *everything*. Gottlob Frege proposed that ALL truths can be captured in terms of mathematical entities;
More informationBenjamin Morison, On Location: Aristotle s Concept of Place, Oxford University Press, 2002, 202pp, $45.00, ISBN
Benjamin Morison, On Location: Aristotle s Concept of Place, Oxford University Press, 2002, 202pp, $45.00, ISBN 0199247919. Aristotle s account of place is one of the most puzzling chapters in Aristotle
More informationVagueness in sparseness: a study in property ontology
vagueness in sparseness 315 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Oxford, UK and Malden, USAANALAnalysis0003-26382005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.October 200565431521ArticlesElizabeth Barnes Vagueness in sparseness Vagueness
More informationMerricks on the existence of human organisms
Merricks on the existence of human organisms Cian Dorr August 24, 2002 Merricks s Overdetermination Argument against the existence of baseballs depends essentially on the following premise: BB Whenever
More informationDo Ordinary Objects Exist? No. * Trenton Merricks. Current Controversies in Metaphysics edited by Elizabeth Barnes. Routledge Press. Forthcoming.
Do Ordinary Objects Exist? No. * Trenton Merricks Current Controversies in Metaphysics edited by Elizabeth Barnes. Routledge Press. Forthcoming. I. Three Bad Arguments Consider a pair of gloves. Name the
More informationMovie Unit: Creation and God s Goodness
July 2-3 2016 Movie Unit: Creation and God s Goodness Genesis 1; Romans 8:28 God created everything good. Connect Time (15 minutes): Five minutes after the service begins, split kids into groups and begin
More informationThis is important as many of them may have had things spoken over them by friends or family, and this sessions starts to
CHOSEN AIM In this session, we are aiming to study the following: Where we find our identity in today s culture That our identity can be found in God That God has made each person unique and considers
More informationDo Ordinary Objects Exist? No. * Trenton Merricks. Current Controversies in Metaphysics edited by Elizabeth Barnes. Routledge Press. Forthcoming.
Do Ordinary Objects Exist? No. * Trenton Merricks Current Controversies in Metaphysics edited by Elizabeth Barnes. Routledge Press. Forthcoming. I. Three Bad Arguments Consider a pair of gloves. Name the
More informationCh01. Knowledge. What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5
Ch01 Knowledge What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5 Nick DeMello, PhD. 2007-2016 Ch01 Knowledge Knowledge Imagination Truth & Belief Justification Science
More informationMaximality and Microphysical Supervenience
Maximality and Microphysical Supervenience Theodore Sider Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2003): 139 149 Abstract A property, F, is maximal iff, roughly, large parts of an F are not themselves
More informationAre the Questions of Metaphysics More Fundamental Than Those of Science? Alyssa Ney. Draft of November 1, 2017
Are the Questions of Metaphysics More Fundamental Than Those of Science? Alyssa Ney Draft of November 1, 2017 The project of naturalistic metaphysics appears straightforward. Start with one s best scientific
More informationStatues, Lumps, and Identity
University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Philosophy Graduate Theses & Dissertations Philosophy Spring 1-1-2012 Statues, Lumps, and Identity Jason Lee Hanschmann University of Colorado at Boulder, hanschma@colorado.edu
More informationGiving Testimony and Witness
Giving Testimony and Witness Exploration: Discovery About this Setting Most people go to church to experience God, but our encounters with the Holy are in the very fabric of our lives. We live as individuals
More informationThe Argument from Vagueness for Modal Parts
The Argument from Vagueness for Modal Parts Abstract. It has been argued by some that the Argument from Vagueness is one of the strongest arguments in favor of the theory of temporal parts. I will neither
More informationIMAGES OF GOD VOL. 17, NO JULY 30, Scripture: Psalm 105:1-8
VOL. 17, NO. 31 - JULY 30, 2017 IMAGES OF GOD Scripture: Psalm 105:1-8 1 O give thanks to the LORD, call on his name, make known his deeds among the peoples. 2 Sing to him, sing praises to him; tell of
More informationAs always, it is very important to cultivate the right and proper motivation on the side of the teacher and the listener.
HEART SUTRA 2 Commentary by HE Dagri Rinpoche There are many different practices of the Bodhisattva one of the main practices is cultivating the wisdom that realises reality and the reason why this text
More informationComposition and Vagueness
Composition and Vagueness TRENTON MERRICKS Mind 114 (2005): 615-637. Restricted composition says that there are some composite objects. And it says that some objects jointly compose nothing at all. The
More informationEmpty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic
Empty Names and Two-Valued Positive Free Logic 1 Introduction Zahra Ahmadianhosseini In order to tackle the problem of handling empty names in logic, Andrew Bacon (2013) takes on an approach based on positive
More informationCounterparts and Compositional Nihilism: A Reply to A. J. Cotnoir
Thought ISSN 2161-2234 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Counterparts and Compositional Nihilism: University of Kentucky DOI:10.1002/tht3.92 1 A brief summary of Cotnoir s view One of the primary burdens of the mereological
More informationin defence of an argument for evans s principle 167
in defence of an argument for evans s principle 167 conditions the non-branching psychological continuity theorist should revert to (5), which has not been shown to be circular. 5 I conclude that if the
More informationOn Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. by Christian Green
On Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction by Christian Green Evidently such a position of extreme skepticism about a distinction is not in general justified merely by criticisms,
More informationFinal Paper. May 13, 2015
24.221 Final Paper May 13, 2015 Determinism states the following: given the state of the universe at time t 0, denoted S 0, and the conjunction of the laws of nature, L, the state of the universe S at
More informationHello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of
PHI 110 Lecture 4 1 Hello. Welcome to what will be one of two lectures on John Locke s theories of personhood and personal identity. The title I have for this lecture is Consciousness, Persons and Responsibility.
More informationOn the Coherence of Strict Finitism
On the Coherence of Strict Finitism Auke Alesander Montesano Montessori Abstract Strict finitism is the position that only those natural numbers exist that we can represent in practice. Michael Dummett,
More informationThe Marks of a True Christian. Romans: 12: 1-21
The Marks of a True Christian Romans: 12: 1-21 Today, we have a familiar text from the Book of Romans and just by simply hearing and reading these very words from Paul, we know that this text has something
More informationonly from photographs. Even the very content of our thought requires an external factor. Clarissa s thought will not be about the Eiffel Tower just in
Review of John McDowell s Mind, Value, and Reality, pp. ix + 400 (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1998), 24. 95, and Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp. ix + 462 (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University
More informationIf you enjoy this preview chapter you can buy the full version on Amazon:
If you enjoy this preview chapter you can buy the full version on Amazon: http://bit.ly/exoticmundane The Exotic and the Mundane by Joyce Dickens Published by UPTRN PO Box 401 Laporte, CO 80535 www.uptrn.com
More informationPhilosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics. Lecture 3 Survival of Death?
Question 1 Philosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics Lecture 3 Survival of Death? How important is it to you whether humans survive death? Do you agree or disagree with the following view? Given a choice
More informationThink by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 7b The World
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
More informationAquinas, The Divine Nature
Aquinas, The Divine Nature So far we have shown THAT God exists, but we don t yet know WHAT God is like. Here, Aquinas demonstrates attributes of God, who is: (1) Simple (i.e., God has no parts) (2) Perfect
More informationA Spatial Approach to Mereology
A version of this paper appears in Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.), Mereology and Location (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 69-90. A Spatial Approach to Mereology Ned Markosian 1 Introduction Recent discussions
More informationWHEN ARE OBJECTS PARTS?
Philosophical Perspectives, 1, Metaphysics, 1987 WHEN ARE OBJECTS PARTS? Peter van lnwagen Syracuse University That there are deep and intractable metaphysical problems about material objects is evident
More informationFraming the Debate over Persistence
RYAN J. WASSERMAN Framing the Debate over Persistence 1 Introduction E ndurantism is often said to be the thesis that persisting objects are, in some sense, wholly present throughout their careers. David
More informationThe Language Revolution Russell Marcus Fall 2014
The Language Revolution Russell Marcus Fall 2014 Class #3 Meinong and Mill The Last of the Pre-Revolutionaries Marcus, The Language Revolution, Fall 2014, Slide 1 Truth, Language, and Ideas The Moderns
More informationGod After Darwin. 3. Evolution and The Great Hierarchy of Being. August 6, to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome!
God After Darwin 3. Evolution and The Great Hierarchy of Being August 6, 2006 9 to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome! God Our Father, open our eyes to see your hand at work in the splendor of creation,
More informationKindergarten-2nd. Genesis 2; Philippians 4:6. We need God s Rescue.
Kindergarten-2nd June 20-21, 2015 Genesis 2; Philippians 4:6 Connect Time (15 minutes): Five minutes after the service begins, split kids into groups and begin their activity. Large Group (30 minutes):
More informationDescartes on the separateness of mind and body
Descartes on the separateness of mind and body Jeff Speaks August 23, 2018 1 The method of doubt............................... 1 2 What cannot be doubted............................. 2 3 Why the mind
More informationNames Introduced with the Help of Unsatisfied Sortal Predicates: Reply to Aranyosi
Names Introduced with the Help of Unsatisfied Sortal Predicates: Reply to Aranyosi Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias Published in: Axiomathes DOI: 10.1007/s10516-009-9072-5 Published: 2010-01-01 Link to publication
More informationFirst Truths. G. W. Leibniz
Copyright Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small dots enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text.
More informationShrinking Difference Response to Replies. Lynne Rudder Baker University of Massachusetts Amherst
Shrinking Difference Response to Replies Lynne Rudder Baker University of Massachusetts Amherst First, I d like to express my appreciation to Amie L. Thomasson, Beth Preston, Peter Kroes and Pieter E.
More informationFACT: CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE INFINITE ITSELF
4 FACT: CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE INFINITE ITSELF WHAT DOES THE WORD infi nite really mean? Is Consciousness, or what some call the Self, the Divine, or God, really the Infinite does an Infinite really exist?
More informationLOWE S DEFENCE OF CONSTITUTION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF WEAK EXTENSIONALITY David B. Hershenov
LOWE S DEFENCE OF CONSTITUTION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF WEAK EXTENSIONALITY David B. Hershenov Abstract E.J. Lowe is one of the few philosophers who defend both the existence of spatially coincident entities
More informationTuning-in to the Breath
1 Tuning-in to the Breath Thanissaro Bhikkhu December, 2002 When I first went to stay with Ajaan Fuang, one of the questions I asked him was, What do you need to believe in order to meditate? He answered
More informationL E S S O N S A M P L E
LESSON SAMPLE FAMILY CIRCLE TIME / OLD TESTAMENT / LESSON 5 No Greater Name PREPARE / START THE ADVENTURE AT HOME Read Genesis 11:1-9. This week The GREAT LIFE will consider how people have been trying
More informationDoes Personhood Begin at Conception?
Does Personhood Begin at Conception? Ed Morris Denver Seminary: PR 652 April 18, 2012 Preliminary Metaphysical Concepts What is it that enables an entity to persist, or maintain numerical identity, through
More informationIs the World an Illusion? by Thomas Razzeto infinitelymystical.com
Is the World an Illusion? by Thomas Razzeto infinitelymystical.com Many of us have heard people say The world is an illusion. But why would anyone say that? (Imagine the sound of bare knuckles knocking
More informationLESSON OVERVIEW/SCHEDULE
TEACHER BIBLE STUDY God rescued His people from the Egyptians! He then led them into the desert toward Mount Sinai. The Israelites camped at the base of the mountain while Moses went up the mountain to
More informationSkepticism and Internalism
Skepticism and Internalism John Greco Abstract: This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical
More informationAgainst Lewis: branching or divergence?
485 Against Lewis: branching or divergence? Tomasz Placek Abstract: I address some interpretational issues of the theory of branching space-times and defend it against David Lewis objections. 1. Introduction
More informationLogic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic
Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 Propositions A proposition is a statement that can be true or false. Propositions are sometimes called
More informationCrawford L. Elder, Familiar Objects and Their Shadows, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 222pp., $85.00 (hardback), ISBN
Crawford L. Elder, Familiar Objects and Their Shadows, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 222pp., $85.00 (hardback), ISBN 1107003237. Reviewed by Daniel Z. Korman, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
More informationPersonal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection
Personal Identity and the Jehovah' s Witness View of the Resurrection Steven B. Cowan Abstract: It is commonly known that the Watchtower Society (Jehovah's Witnesses) espouses a materialist view of human
More informationHumean Supervenience: Lewis (1986, Introduction) 7 October 2010: J. Butterfield
Humean Supervenience: Lewis (1986, Introduction) 7 October 2010: J. Butterfield 1: Humean supervenience and the plan of battle: Three key ideas of Lewis mature metaphysical system are his notions of possible
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES Philosophical Perspectives, 25, Metaphysics, 2011 ESSENCE, PLENITUDE, AND PARADOX Sarah-Jane Leslie Princeton University Essentialism in philosophy is the view that there are
More informationLogic -type questions
Logic -type questions [For use in the Philosophy Test and the Philosophy section of the MLAT] One of the questions on a test may take the form of a logic exercise, starting with the definition of a key
More informationKindergarten-2nd. August 8-9, Joshua and Jericho. Numbers 22; Proverbs 3:5-6. God is in control.
Kindergarten-2nd August 8-9, 2015 Joshua and Jericho Numbers 22; Proverbs 3:5-6 God is in control. Connect Time (15 minutes): Five minutes after the service begins, split kids into groups and begin their
More informationMaterial objects: composition & constitution
Material objects: composition & constitution Today we ll be turning from the paradoxes of space and time to series of metaphysical paradoxes. Metaphysics is a part of philosophy, though it is not easy
More informationCartesian Dualism. I am not my body
Cartesian Dualism I am not my body Dualism = two-ism Concerning human beings, a (substance) dualist says that the mind and body are two different substances (things). The brain is made of matter, and part
More informationPhysicalism and Conceptual Analysis * Esa Díaz-León.
Physicalism and Conceptual Analysis * Esa Díaz-León pip01ed@sheffield.ac.uk Physicalism is a widely held claim about the nature of the world. But, as it happens, it also has its detractors. The first step
More information8 Connected: my life in the church LifeWay
8 Connected: my life in the church I am a Christian. Therefore, I am connected. Let s make a quick list of pressing issues we face on a regular basis: Making wise career choices. Raising a family. Keeping
More informationThe Paradox of Increase
The Paradox of Increase Eric T. Olson Copyright 2007, THE MONIST: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry. Peru, Illinois, USA 61354. Reprinted in D. Zimmerman and P. van Inwagen,
More informationJefferson Unitarian Church Evergreen Campus March 16, 2014 Dana Lightsey. Cherish Your Doubts
Jefferson Unitarian Church Evergreen Campus March 16, 2014 Dana Lightsey 1 Cherish Your Doubts Plato said, The truth is in the paradox. If you are not seeing the paradox, you are not seeing the whole truth.
More information