Phil-004 (Galindo): Spring 14 - Quiz #4
|
|
- Oliver Gaines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ch 8: Choose the best categorical claim translation of the claims below. (1pt each) 1. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Every baseball player is an athlete. a. All baseball players are athletes. b. All athletes are baseball players. c. Some baseball players are athletes. 2. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Not every musician can read music. a. All people who can read music are musicians. b. Some musicians are not people who can read music. c. No musicians are people who can read music. 3. Which is the best translation for this claim: "There are no hard questions on this quiz. a. All questions on this quiz are hard questions. b. Some questions on this quiz are not hard questions. c. No hard questions are questions on this quiz. 4. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Only cable modems are fast enough for online gaming." a. All modems fast enough for online gaming are cable modems. b. All cable modems are fast enough for online gaming. c. Some cable modems are not modems fast enough for online gaming. 5. Which is the best translation for this claim: "Motivated students are the only students who should take online classes." a. All students who should take online classes are motivated students. b. Some motivated students are students who should take online classes. c. All motivated students are students who should take online classes. Read the following passages and select the BEST answer available. (1pt each) Passage #1: (P1) No X are Y. (P2) Some Y are not Z.(C) So, some X are not Z 6. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 7. Which diagram from group #2 represents both? 8. What is the middle term? a. X c. Z b. Y d. No middle term 9. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? b. #2 distribution of middle term in d. No rules are broken. So this is a valid
2 Passage #2: (P1) All X are Y. (P2) No Y are Z. (C) So, no X are Z 10. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 11. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 12. What is the middle term? a. X c. Z b. Y d. No middle term 13. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? b. #2 distribution of middle term in d. No rules are broken. So this is a valid Passage #3: (P1) No coinsurance policies are policies that cover the full value of the property. (P2) Some policies that cover the full value of the property are discounted policies. (C) So, some discounted policies are not coinsurance policies. 14. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 15. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 16. What is the middle term? a. Coinsurance policies c. Discounted policies b. Policies that cover the full value of the d. No middle term property 17. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Passage #4: (P1) The Johnson s new lawn furniture is made out of plastic. (P2) Plastic furniture is always cheap. (C) So all of their lawn furniture must be cheap. 18. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 19. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 20. What is the middle term? a. The Johnson s new lawn furniture. c. Cheap furniture. b. Plastic furniture. d. No middle term 21. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Passage #5: Every college professor dresses well, and nobody who dresses well is ugly. Therefore, no college professor is ugly. 22. Which diagram from group #1 could be used to represent the conclusion? 23. Which diagram from group #2 could be used to represent both? 24. What is the quality of this deductive argument? a. Valid b. Invalid b. Strong d. Weak Passage #6: Only people who hold stock in the company may vote, so Mr. Hansen must not hold any stock in the company, because I know he was not allowed to vote. 25. What is the middle term? a. People who hold stock in the company c. People who are allowed to vote b. All people identical to Mr. Hansen d. No middle term
3 26. Which rule is broken in this deductive argument? Use any method you choose to determine if the argument below is valid or invalid. (3pts that s why you have to provide the answer three times.) Passage #1: None of the southern provinces of Spain were outside the control of the Moors before the end of the fifteenth century. So all the provinces of Andalucia must have been within Moorish control, because all of them are southern provinces. 27. a. Valid b. Invalid 28. a. Valid b. Invalid 29. a. Valid b. Invalid Ch 10: Choose the BEST answer to the questions below. (1pt each) 30. Which of the following syllogisms is stronger? a. Copper conducts electricity. This fork is made entirely of copper. So, this fork will conduct electricity. b. Sixteen out of twenty people in this room are first-borns. Shelly is in the room. Shelly is a first-born. 31. Which type of inductive argument moves from something we know about the population to a claim about an individual member of the population? 32. Which type of inductive arguments moves from something we know about a sample of a population to a claim about the entire population? 33. Which type of inductive argument is based upon comparing the similarity between terms? 34. When analyzing an inductive generalization, which of the following could make the argument stronger? a. Larger sample size c. More similarities between the terms of the analogy. b. Smaller sample size d. Vague features 35. When analyzing an inductive argument from analogy, which of the following could make the argument stronger? a. Larger sample size c. More similarities between the terms of the analogy. b. Smaller sample size d. Vague features Read the following passages and select the best answer available. (1pt each) Passage #1: They say Japanese carmakers put out the best cars in the world, all things considered. But that can t be right the Toyota I bought last year had to be returned to the shop five times! 36. What is the sample? 37. What is the target population?
4 38. What is the feature of this inductive argument? Passage #2: Marcia owns a small fruit stand. She has placed seven orders with wholesale fruit supplier Sweet & Juicy Farms and all of them have been filled with fresh looking fruit. Lately, however, some wholesale competitors have been trying to get her to order from them. But, when it s time to make the next order, she decides she s better off with Sweet & Juicy because she s pretty sure she ll get fresh looking fruit. (Do not assume that you know anything about the fruit business.) 39. If Marcia had placed four orders with Sweet & Juicy Farms with the same result, her argument would be a. Stronger c. No change b. Weaker d. Weaker and stronger at the same time 40. If all the preceding orders had been for apples, then her argument would be stronger if the new order was for a. both apples and oranges. c. just oranges. b. just apples. d. fruit seeds. 41. If we don t know what kind of fruit she s about to order, we have the strongest argument if the previous orders were a. both apples and oranges. c. just oranges. b. just apples. d. fruit seeds. 42. The original passage is an (a) a. Inductive generalization c. Inductive syllogism. b. Argument from analogy d. No argument is presented. 43. The feature here is a. Sweet & Juicy Farms. c. Good looking fruit. b. Marcia s fruit stand. d. Wholesale competitors. Passage #3: Julia is good at bowling. I bet she d be great at poker, they are both games that require skill. 44. Which of the following is a term (analogue) of the analogy? 45. Which of the following is a similarity between the terms of the analogy? 46. Which of the following is the feature (attribute of interest) of the analogy? 47. Which of the following is the conclusion of the argument? a. Julia is good at bowling. c. Bowling and poker are both games that require skill. b. Julia would be great a poker. d. There is no conclusion because it is an anlogy. Passage #4: Most of the time I drive to class there s crazy traffic on the freeway. We ve had around sixteen class meetings already, and I ve been late twelve times!! I m almost certain that out of the next eight class meeting I ll be late about six times! 48. What is the sample size? a. 6 c. 12 b. 8 d. 16
5 49. What is the confidence level indicator of the conclusion of the argument? a. Most c. Almost certain b. Around d. About 50. Which of the following is the margin of error indicator in the conclusion of the argument? a. Most c. Almost certain b. Around d. About
Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon
Review Deductive Logic Wk2 Day 2 Checking Validity of Deductive Argument Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism Identify premises and conclusion. Look out for unstated premises. Place them in order P(1), P(2),
More informationAnnouncements. Quiz #4. Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? High Score? BUT, everyone will get +1pt!
Announcements Quiz #4 Review, see me before the Final Exam for help. Average? 37/50, 74% High Score? 45 BUT, everyone will get +1pt! #47 was graded incorrectly. Answer should be C. Critical Thinking Ninjas!
More informationINDUCTION. All inductive reasoning is based on an assumption called the UNIFORMITY OF NATURE.
INDUCTION John Stuart Mill wrote the first comprehensive study of inductive logic. Deduction had been studied extensively since ancient times, but induction had to wait until the 19 th century! The cartoon
More informationReading and Evaluating Arguments
Reading and Evaluating Arguments Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments To recognize errors in logical reasoning An argument
More informationTable of Contents. What This Book Teaches... iii Four Myths About Critical Thinking... iv Pretest...v
Table of Contents Table of Contents What This Book Teaches... iii Four Myths About Critical Thinking... iv Pretest...v 1. What Is Critical Thinking?...1 2. Decisions and Conclusions...4 3. Beliefs and
More informationIntroduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Introduction to Logic Instructor: Jason Sheley In this section we will learn: What is the difference between Deduction and Induction? Why use different types of logic? What is a valid argument? Invalid?
More informationExample Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning First Steps to Analyzing an Argument In the following slides, some simple arguments will be given. The steps to begin analyzing each argument
More informationCritical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley
Critical Thinking - Wk 3 Instructor: Jason Sheley Quick Quiz Give an example of a statement. Give an example of sentence that is not a statement. Give an example of an argument Validity, Truth, Soundness,
More informationChapter 4: More Inductive Reasoning
Chapter 4: More Inductive Reasoning Let s review. You ve learned about the structure of arguments (premises and a conclusion), how to recognize arguments, and about deductive and inductive arguments. Now,
More informationWhat could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM
2 4 Deductive Reasoning Learning Targets: I understand deductive reasoning I can use the Law of Detachment I can use a Venn diagram to draw conclusions I can use the Law of Syllogism What other evidence
More informationGeometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic Name Period Date Symbolic notation: 1. Define the following symbols. a b ~ c d e g a b c d a b c d 2. Consider the following legend: Let p = You love bananas. Let
More informationAs noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in
As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in that if the premises of the argument are true, then
More informationTest Item File. Full file at
Test Item File 107 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1: Basic Logical Concepts Multiple Choice 1. In which of the following subjects is reasoning outside the concern of logicians? A) science and medicine B) ethics C)
More informationThere are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.
INTRODUCTION TO LOGICAL THINKING Lecture 6: Two types of argument and their role in science: Deduction and induction 1. Deductive arguments Arguments that claim to provide logically conclusive grounds
More informationIn view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES
IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES Instructions: Determine whether the following are propositions. If some are not propositions, see if they can be rewritten as propositions. (1) I have a very refined sense of smell.
More information2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.
More informationPhilosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI
Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase
More informationC. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 March 19 & 24, 2015 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Roll B. Schedule C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know D. Discussion
More information1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
I. LOGIC AND ARGUMENTATION 1 A. LOGIC 1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. 3. It doesn t attempt to determine how people in fact reason. 4.
More informationNorva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan
CRITICAL THINKING Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan LECTURE 4! Nondeductive Success: Statistical Syllogism, Inductive Generalization, Analogical Argument Summary In this week
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More informationPhilosophy 1100: Ethics
Philosophy 1100: Ethics Topic 1 - Course Introduction: 1. What is Philosophy? 2. What is Ethics? 3. Logic a. Truth b. Arguments c. Validity d. Soundness What is Philosophy? The Three Fundamental Questions
More informationUnit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14
Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing I. Reasoning At its core, reasoning is using what is known as building blocks to create new knowledge I use the words logic and reasoning interchangeably. Technically,
More informationPRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.
PRACTICE EXAM 1 I. Decide which of the following are arguments. For those that are, identify the premises and conclusions in them by CIRCLING them and labeling them with a P for the premises or a C for
More informationGENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS
PRACTICAL LOGIC Bryan Rennie GENERAL NOTES ON THE CLASS EXPLANATION OF GRADES AND POINTS, ETC. SAMPLE QUIZZES SCHEDULE OF CLASSES THE SIX RULES OF SYLLOGISMS (and corresponding fallacies) SYMBOLS USED
More informationLogic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments
Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments Logic teaches us to develop a system of methods and principles to use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others to guide us in constructing arguments
More informationChapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life
Chapter 1 What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life Why Study Philosophy? Defining Philosophy Studying philosophy in a serious and reflective way will change you as a person Philosophy Is
More informationPLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ Critical Thinking: Quiz 4 Chapter Three: Argument Evaluation Section I. Indicate whether the following claims (1-10) are either true (A) or false (B). 1. If an arguer precedes
More informationThree Kinds of Arguments
Chapter 27 Three Kinds of Arguments Arguments in general We ve been focusing on Moleculan-analyzable arguments for several chapters, but now we want to take a step back and look at the big picture, at
More informationHuffPost: NFL September 25-26, US Adults
1. Most heard news Which have you heard MOST about in the past few days? NFL players kneeling in protest during the national anthem 61% 61% 61% 55% 59% 65% 63% 64% 57% 58% 44% Puerto Rico dealing with
More informationYouGov June 13-14, US Adults
1. Heard about Tweets In the months since the 2016 election, how much have you heard about on Twitter? Heard a lot 63% 68% 58% 57% 50% 65% 81% 65% 64% 54% 57% Heard a little 29% 26% 32% 35% 34% 29% 17%
More information13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments
EulerDiagrams.nb 1 13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic rguments In the preceding section, we showed how to determine the validity of symbolic arguments using truth tables and comparing the arguments to
More informationYouGov January 31 - February 1, 2017
1. Immigration Ban Immigration Action Approval President Trump recently signed an executive order banning travel for people from seven Muslim-majority countries Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and
More informationGeometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015
Do Now Write the converse of each true statement. If true, combine the statements to write a true biconditional. If the converse is false, give a counterexample. a) If an angle measures 30 o, then it is
More informationHuffPost: Seasons greetings December 4-6, US Adults
1. Celebrate Christmas Do you celebrate Christmas? Yes 85% 84% 87% 80% 82% 87% 91% 88% 84% 88% 63% No 9% 11% 8% 9% 8% 12% 8% 9% 11% 2% 21% Not sure 5% 5% 5% 11% 10% 0% 1% 3% 5% 10% 16% Totals 99% 100%
More informationBasic Concepts and Skills!
Basic Concepts and Skills! Critical Thinking tests rationales,! i.e., reasons connected to conclusions by justifying or explaining principles! Why do CT?! Answer: Opinions without logical or evidential
More information1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.
Logic Chapter 1 Practice Test: True / False: Mark each of the following statements as True or False. 1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments
More informationDirections: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B).
Critical Thinking Exam 2: Chapter 3 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS EXAM. Directions: For Problems 1-10, determine whether the given statement is either True (A) or False (B). 1. Valid arguments never have
More informationPart 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms
Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms Consider Argument 1 and Argument 2, and select the option that correctly identifies the valid argument(s), if any. Argument 1 All bears are omnivores. All omnivores
More informationPortfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7
Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments
More informationCategorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring Sound: Any valid argument with true premises.
Categorical Logic Handout Logic: Spring 2017 Deductive argument: An argument whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion. Validity: A characteristic of any
More informationDeduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises
Deduction Deductive arguments, deduction, deductive logic all means the same thing. They are different ways of referring to the same style of reasoning Deduction is just one mode of reasoning, but it is
More informationNotes on types of Arguments (for Philosophy of Science) by Justin C. Fisher
1. Arguments Notes on types of Arguments (for Philosophy of Science) by Justin C. Fisher An argument is a set of statements (called premises ) offered in support of a conclusion. Philosophers typically
More informationControlled Experiments
1 2 Next Controlled Experiments A controlled experiment is a method of testing a prediction or hypothesis in which a relationship between different variables is identified. In a controlled experiment,
More informationSHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
Exam Name SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Draw a Venn diagram for the given sets. In words, explain why you drew one set as a subset of
More informationFaith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.
19 Chapter 3 19 CHAPTER 3: Logic Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them. The last proceeding of reason is to recognize
More informationLogic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University
Logic: A Brief Introduction Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University 2012 CONTENTS Part I Critical Thinking Chapter 1 Basic Training 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Logic, Propositions and Arguments 1.3 Deduction and Induction
More informationFollow Will of the People. Your leftist h. b. ave often d1sgusted b h
Philosophy 101 (3/24/11) I ve posted solutions to HW #3 (study these!) HW #4 is due today Quiz #4 is next Thursday This will be re-do of the last quiz (on chs. 3&4) I ll give you the higher of your two
More informationPHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT 1. ARGUMENTS PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1.1 DEDUCTIVE VS INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
PHILOSOPHER S TOOL KIT PROFESSOR JULIE YOO 1. Arguments 1.1 Deductive vs Induction Arguments 1.2 Common Deductive Argument Forms 1.3 Common Inductive Argument Forms 1.4 Deduction: Validity and Soundness
More informationBaronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide
Chapter 6: Categorical Syllogisms Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide A. Standard-form Categorical Syllogisms A categorical syllogism is an argument containing three categorical propositions: two premises
More informationPhil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle. Identifying Arguments i
Phil 3304 Introduction to Logic Dr. David Naugle Identifying Arguments Dallas Baptist University Introduction Identifying Arguments i Any kid who has played with tinker toys and Lincoln logs knows that
More informationLogic Practice Test 1
Logic Practice Test 1 Name True or False 1. Implying is said to be analogous to hearing. 2. Opinions can be mistaken, but knowledge cannot. 3. According to the book, whatever a person thinks is true is
More information1.2. What is said: propositions
1.2. What is said: propositions 1.2.0. Overview In 1.1.5, we saw the close relation between two properties of a deductive inference: (i) it is a transition from premises to conclusion that is free of any
More informationIn a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the
The Flow of Argument Lecture 9 In a previous lecture, we used Aristotle s syllogisms to emphasize the central concept of validity. Visualizing syllogisms in terms of three-circle Venn diagrams gave us
More informationHuffPost: Sexual harassment November 16-17, US Adults
1. Serious problem How serious of a problem do you think sexual harassment is in the United States? Very serious 49% 39% 58% 51% 45% 52% 47% 44% 70% 54% 47% Somewhat serious 29% 33% 25% 20% 31% 29% 36%
More informationThe Shirt: Current Amount Sold: 2
The Shirt: http://teespring.com/jesus-calm Current Amount Sold: 2 The Niche: Here we are back at the Christian niche, this is the 2 nd or 3 rd time this niche has been featured in The Shack. Great, passionate
More informationHow To Buy Material Handling Supplies Online?
How To Buy Material Handling Supplies Online? Most of the companies with production lines have now realized the importance of material handling. It is no longer norm for people to be pushing heavy boxes
More informationReasoning SYLLOGISM. follows.
Reasoning SYLLOGISM RULES FOR DERIVING CONCLUSIONS 1. The Conclusion does not contain the Middle Term (M). Premises : All spoons are plates. Some spoons are cups. Invalid Conclusion : All spoons are cups.
More informationPHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic
PHI 103 - Introduction Lecture 4 An Overview of the wo Branches of Logic he wo Branches of Logic Argument - at least two statements where one provides logical support for the other. I. Deduction - a conclusion
More informationArgumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy
Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy By Timo Schmitz, Philosopher As argumentative analogy or simply analogism (ἀναλογισµός), one calls the comparison through inductive reasoning of at least
More information1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments
M01_COPI1396_13_SE_C01.QXD 10/10/07 9:48 PM Page 26 26 CHAPTER 1 Basic Logical Concepts 19. All ethnic movements are two-edged swords. Beginning benignly, and sometimes necessary to repair injured collective
More informationBuy A Wedding party Dress
Buy A Wedding party Dress Every year, we have to attend many parties. Wedding party, birthday party, anniversary party... Friends and relatives go together to celebrate for one thing. I like party very
More information1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity
18. If inflation heats up, then interest rates will rise. If interest rates rise, then bond prices will decline. Therefore, if inflation heats up, then bond prices will decline. 19. Statistics reveal that
More informationRelevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant when they do not 1 Non Sequitur Latin for it does
More informationUnit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism
Unit 8 Categorical yllogism What is a syllogism? Inference or reasoning is the process of passing from one or more propositions to another with some justification. This inference when expressed in language
More informationLogic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the needs of the one (Spock and Captain Kirk).
Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the needs of the one (Spock and Captain Kirk). Discuss Logic cannot show that the needs of the many outweigh the needs
More informationChapter Notes (Final Exam) On April, 26, 2012
Chapter Notes (Final Exam) On April, 26, 2012 Part 3: Arguments Chapter 8: Inductive Reasoning (270-324) -Deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion; such
More informationLOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)
LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012) Deductive Vs. Inductive If the conclusion is claimed to follow with strict certainty
More informationSection 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.
Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments What You Will Learn Symbolic arguments Standard forms of arguments 3.5-2 Symbolic Arguments A symbolic argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. It is called
More informationREADTHEORY TEACHING STUDENTS TO READ AND THINK CRITICALLY
READTHEORY TEACHING STUDENTS TO READ AND THINK CRITICALLY Level 4 Samples 3 Reading Comprehension Assessments ReadTheory.org For exciting updates, offers, and other helpful information, follow us on Facebook
More informationCritical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments
5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments REMEMBER as explained in an earlier section formal language is used for expressing relations in abstract form, based on clear and unambiguous
More informationPastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011
Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church http://www.fbcweb.org/doctrines.html September 8, 2011 Building Mental Muscle & Growing the Mind through Logic Exercises: Lesson 4a The Three Acts of the
More informationPHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1
Y e P a g e 1 Exercise 1 Pg. 17 1. When is an idea or statement valid? (trick question) A statement or an idea cannot be valid; they can only be true or false. Being valid or invalid are properties of
More informationWhat is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing
What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing Logical relations Deductive logic Claims to provide conclusive support for the truth of a conclusion Inductive
More informationPHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES
PHIL2642 CRITICAL THINKING USYD NOTES PART 1: LECTURE NOTES LECTURE CONTENTS LECTURE 1: CLAIMS, EXPLAINATIONS AND ARGUMENTS LECTURE 2: CONDITIONS AND DEDUCTION LECTURE 3: MORE DEDUCTION LECTURE 4: MEANING
More informationMEGHAN PERCIVAL. Adviser, McLean High School Yearbook McLean, VA
MEGHAN PERCIVAL Adviser, McLean High School Yearbook McLean, VA Yearbook NV 2014 name that BRAND! SORRY trick question The is the Nike LOGO, not their brand. The is NOT the reason people spend $100 on
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationQuestions for Critically Reading an Argument
ARGUMENT Questions for Critically Reading an Argument What claims does the writer make? What kinds and quality of evidence does the writer provide to support the claim? What assumptions underlie the argument,
More information"I Am the Vine" May 2018
"I Am the Vine" May 2018 Branching out God designed humanity to be connected and nurtured by Him. The bible verse is about a vine, and usually people talk about grape vines, but why not a tomato or pumpkin
More informationUnit 4. Reason as a way of knowing
Unit 4 Reason as a way of knowing Zendo The Master will present two Koans - one that follows the rule and one that does not. Teams will take turns presenting their own koans to the master to see if they
More informationPhilosophical Arguments
Philosophical Arguments An introduction to logic and philosophical reasoning. Nathan D. Smith, PhD. Houston Community College Nathan D. Smith. Some rights reserved You are free to copy this book, to distribute
More informationThe antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent
Critical Thinking Lecture Four October 5, 2012 Chapter 3 Deductive Argument Patterns Diagramming Arguments Deductive Argument Patterns - There are some common patterns shared by many deductive arguments
More informationSection 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.
Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments INB able of Contents Date opic Page # July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Examples 84 July 28, 2014 Section 3.5 Notes 85 July 28, 2014 Section 3.6 Examples 86 July 28, 2014 Section
More informationThe Heart of Worship, Pt. Four 1 (Hebrews 12:28-29)
1 2/26/17 West Valley Church Michael O Neill The Heart of Worship, Pt. Four 1 (Hebrews 12:28-29) I started out my career in ministry back in 1984, right out of college as a full-time youth pastor at a
More informationWhat we want students to do with what they ve learned: To identify what it means to pursue righteousness in their day- to- day lives.
Lesson 3: Righteous Reliance What we want students to learn: That as Christ- followers, we re called to live lives of righteousness. What we want students to do with what they ve learned: To identify what
More informationWhat is reason? The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic
WoK 3 Reason What is reason? Webster s Dictionary defines reason as: The power of the mind to think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic and logic as: reasoning conducted or assessed according
More informationChapter Five. Persuasive Writing
Chapter Five Persuasive Writing When I'm getting ready to reason with a man, I spend one-third of my time thinking about myself and what I am going to say and two-thirds thinking about him and what he
More informationPHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning
PHIL / PSYC 351 Thinking and Reasoning The Instructors My name is Jonathan Livengood. I am an assistant professor of philosophy. My primary area of specialization is philosophy of science. Jonathan Livengood
More informationPaul Teaches About Spiritual Gifts
Session 8 Paul Teaches About Spiritual Gifts 1 Corinthians 12:4-27 Worship Theme: God gives us spiritual gifts. Weaving Faith Into Life: Children will praise God for giving them different gifts to use
More informationGod Gives Manna. References Exodus 16:1-5, 14-26; Patriarchs and Prophets, pp
LESSON God Gives Manna Year B 3rd Quarter Lesson 12 WORSHIP We thank God for being with us. References Exodus 16:1-5, 14-26; Patriarchs and Prophets, pp. 294-297. Memory Verse You will have plenty to eat...
More informationHuffPost: Hillary Clinton September 13-14, US Adults
1. Clinton favorability Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton? Very favorable 16% 18% 15% 19% 15% 18% 11% 12% 34% 19% 15% Somewhat favorable 20% 19% 22% 19% 22% 17% 24% 18%
More informationPhilosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity
Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics Critical Thinking Lecture 1 Background Material for the Exercise on Validity Reasons, Arguments, and the Concept of Validity 1. The Concept of Validity Consider
More informationHOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT
What does it mean to provide an argument for a statement? To provide an argument for a statement is an activity we carry out both in our everyday lives and within the sciences. We provide arguments for
More informationLogic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic
Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 Propositions A proposition is a statement that can be true or false. Propositions are sometimes called
More information5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions
M05_COI1396_13_E_C05.QXD 11/13/07 8:39 AM age 182 182 CHATER 5 Categorical ropositions Categorical propositions are the fundamental elements, the building blocks of argument, in the classical account of
More informationVenn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms Unit 5 John Venn 1834 1923 English logician and philosopher noted for introducing the Venn diagram Used in set theory, probability, logic, statistics, and computer
More informationHW3- Sets & Arguments (solutions) Due: Tuesday April 5, 2011
HW #3-SOLUTIONS Topics: Sets, categorical propositions, Venn diagrams, analyzing arguments, and critical thinking Please show your work and clearly indicate your answer. Although you are welcome to compare
More informationJESUS, NAME ABOVE ALL NAMES: I JESUS, OUR STRENGTH Karen F. Bunnell Elkton United Methodist Church March 10, Psalm 91:1-2, Luke 4:1-13
JESUS, NAME ABOVE ALL NAMES: I JESUS, OUR STRENGTH Karen F. Bunnell Elkton United Methodist Church March 10, 2019 1 st Sunday of Lent Psalm 91:1-2, 11-16 Luke 4:1-13 Back in the late 1960 s, our family
More informationCritical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009
Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009 Last week we learned how to analyse arguments and set them out logic-book
More informationAlso, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:
by SALVATORE - 5 September 2009, 10:44 PM I`m having difficulty understanding what steps to take in applying valid argument forms to do a proof. What determines which given premises one should select to
More information