The Conflict Paradox Bernie Mayer
|
|
- Chloe Gaines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Conflict Paradox Bernie Mayer Aled Davies: Hi, everyone. My name is Aled Davies, founder of MediatorAcademy.com, home of the passionate mediator or the passionate conflict specialist. This is where we interview the very best thought leaders, practitioners from around the world. We learn about new opportunities in our field, as well as how to develop our thinking, develop ourselves, sharpen our skills, so that we can be more effective at what we do, helping others in conflict. In this interview, I want to learn about the dilemmas we face as conflict specialists and how to navigate these paradoxes to help us improve our effectiveness. My guest today is an icon in the world of conflict resolution with over a quarter-century of experience in the field. He was a founding partner at CDR Associates, the internationally-recognised mediation and conflict resolution organisation, and originally trained as a psychotherapist. He's worked across the globe as a mediator, facilitator, teacher, trainer, dispute systems designer, programme administrator. He's a true scholar, as well as a leading practitioner in the field. Earning his PhD in social work with an emphasis on conflict resolution, he's now Professor of Dispute Resolution at Werner Institute, Creighton University. He's the author of many works, including 'Beyond Neutrality' and 'Staying with Conflict', both published by Jossey-Bass, and his most recent work, which will be the focus of this interview, 'The Conflict Paradox: Seven Dilemmas at the Core of Disputes'. It's a real pleasure to once again welcome Dr. Bernie Mayer onto Mediator Academy. Bernie, welcome. Bernie Mayer: Thank you. It's very good to be back. Lovely to have you back. Really appreciate it. Your last interview was a real success, provoked a lot of discussion and debate, and I'm sure this one will as well.
2 What I like about the way you write, particularly in 'The Conflict Paradox' is the stories that you tell. I love stories. I think we all are engaged by stories, particularly when they are stories that the author tells about his or her own experiences, where they've either failed miserably or have cocked-up in some way, but have learned from it. Right? I think it normalises - you think, "Oh. Thank God. I'm not just the only one. Bernie is fallible as well." Bernie: We all are, and somebody who only tells you success stories is probably not entirely credible Absolutely. Yeah. Well, I read something about people who describe themselves as "serial entrepreneurs" are more like serial killers. Bernie: That's pretty dire. Yeah. Bernie: I definitely think that it's important to learn from your successes, but it's also really important to learn from where you are not so successful. One of the things I've learned over time is I can't always really tell what's been successful and what hasn't been. You think that things have come out very neatly, only to find out a while later it didn't hold, and some of the experiences I've had where I thought I was a real failure, I found out that that intervention actually made a long-term, very positive impact. So it's not always obvious. Yeah, I know it is. I was just thinking about this interview, as well. Normally I kind of have at least a sort of organised, very loosely, when I say "organised," but I tend to sort of linearly go through things. I thought we would just parachute into a story to kind of get us into the idea of the kind of tensions between these dilemmas and these paradoxes. Bernie: Sort of like the Queen did at the opening ceremonies of the Olympics?
3 Exactly like that. Just like that. The story I want you to tell and the dilemmas that that presented you is a story about your, I was going to say "your illegal poker racket," but it wasn't. It was a poker game. It was a poker evening that you and some of your colleagues had way back when, and a character called Bob or... Bernie: John.... John. Tell us a little bit about that story and how it relates to the book and the paradoxes and why we need to understand this stuff. Bernie: Well, because it's a story in which I completely wimped out. John and I worked together at a drop-in centre for youth in New York City. I think we worked together from 1969 to 1972, or something on that order, on the west side of Manhattan. I was a social worker. I'd finished my graduate training at that point, and most of the other people who worked there were trained similarly. John was what we called in those days, I guess people might still call it that way, but somewhat diminutively, a "paraprofessional." He came from the community. He was a very nice guy, but he wasn't professionally trained, and he was paid less. We all had a male, I might say "only," poker. No it wasn't. I take that back. It was a coeducational poker game, and we played together, I don't know, maybe once a month or something like that, mostly in my apartment in New York City, and John came. High rollers? Bernie: Yeah, really high rollers. I was stuck at making $9,000 a year at the time. As I say, we were paid more than others. He had a family. The rest of us were mostly single. And he was a terrible poker player. What can I say? He was one of these people who could not dare to fold, thought that being bluffed out was a sign of weakness and couldn't really read the math on the table. We would often try to point out and say, "You can't possibly win. Why are you betting? Just look at what's on the table." and it wouldn't work. The game became a matter of taking away
4 money from him and feeling bad about it, and sometimes I think people went down simply to avoid it, and it was really ruining the game. We didn't know what to do, so couple of times we just didn't invite him. I was still working with him at this time. And he said, "When are we going to have our next game?" which was very uncomfortable, and we finally stopped playing. We never said, "John, it doesn't work. Come and watch, but don't play. It's no fun. It's screwing it up." We didn't do it for a lot of reasons, but mostly we didn't do it because we were trying to avoid the issue. The thing that was interesting about it was why. What would have been so hard about doing that? In that, also, it actually even, by ending the game, our relationship with him was never quite the same. It felt like we had done something not quite right, a little bit manipulative. We couldn't quite be straight with him. On the other hand, we felt he was really being obtuse by not really seeing what was going on. Never talked about that. You know what? Seven months afterwards, he took another job, and he left, and I may have seen him once or twice afterwards, but I don't know what happened to him. It was an example to me of what was, on some level, a really silly little issue, was in fact, it had a profound impact on a relationship that was not my closest friend in the world, but it wasn't unimportant to me. Yeah, and of course, the unintended consequences of avoiding it, since we're talking about avoidance, is that you also stopped a fun activity between a set of friends. Bernie: Exactly. Exactly. So what was the alternative?
5 Bernie: What you going to do? The alternative was to say... I played poker many other times in my life. I considered a form of continuing professional education in negotiation, and I've had to do this at other times, not quite as dramatically as that, but would have been to say, "John, for better or worse, you just don't get it, about poker. This isn't your thing, and because it isn't your thing, you're losing a lot of money, and I'm not feeling okay about it. We're not feeling okay about it. Come and hang out with us and watch, and maybe you get a little better sense of it." He might've been upset, he might've been angry, he might've told us to screw off, but it would've been honest, and it would've been treating him like an equal. It would have been respectful of him instead of being patronising. Now we felt like he couldn't handle it, rather than giving him the chance to handle it. Do you think it was a case of you thought he couldn't handle it, or was it a case of you lot couldn't handle giving him the feedback? Bernie: Oh. Absolutely the latter was what it was, and what were we really afraid of? I think when we think of the many different times we don't want to say something to someone... I do an exercise in classes I teach based on a real-life incident, with a colleague of mine, some colleagues of mine, where a bunch of people have to tell somebody else they don't want to drive with them. They're not a safe driver. It's amazing how people will avoid just saying it, or if they say it, how they say it by saying, "Your driving sucks. I'm never going to drive with you again." That's a form of avoidance too, I think, rather than just being straight about saying things. Again, that, similar to the poker incident, is not the biggest deal in the world. You don't want to be driving with somebody you're unsafe with, but telling them that is not like telling them they're a liar or a cheater, incompetent, sexist, racist, and those are important things to be able to say too, find a way to say it too. So what are we afraid of? The interesting thing is, it is a form of avoidance that points also out to how we're engaging in other ways. Every time we decide to avoid something, in a sense we're setting up another conflict. In order to successfully engage in a conflict, we have to choose what elements of it to avoid. This is one of the chapters in the book, the "Avoidance and Engagement" chapter. I often
6 feel like, as somebody who's either coaching somebody in conflict or mediating, or as somebody in conflict myself, it's a continuous process of saying, "What do I engage in? What do I avoid? What do I take on? What element do I not?" I think we're sometimes misled by some of our conflict styles tools where people are either engagers or avoiders, and I just think that is very simplistic. I think we all engage in conflict, and we all avoid conflict. In fact, we all do it, all the time and at once. I want to put the paradox into context then. As a conflict specialist working with other people's conflict, do I need to help parties decide what to avoid, what to engage in? Do I need to think about my own preferences, what I'm comfortable about? Bernie: Yeah, and the way I would say it... I agree. Yes. The answer is "Yes." simply. However, I would say it as, we need to help them think it through, and we need to think it through for ourselves. But it is how do we walk the path of engaging with avoidance? You can think about every turn as a turn towards engagement in one way and avoidance in another. How do we walk that path? Anybody who comes to us has to some extent decided to engage in something, but they've also come to us partly because they're avoiding some of the consequences of doing it without help, which is a wise thing. So those are engagement-avoidance decisions. So when we reach those junctions on that path, how do we decide to turn right or left or go straight on? Well, yeah. Bernie: Right, left, straight on? Anybody walks a lot of paths in the wilderness knows that they tend not to be straight on very much, unless it's across a desert or something. Well, I think it gets down to what are we really trying to do? What's our purpose here, and what are we afraid of? Sometimes there are things we should be afraid of.
7 Everybody who's dealt with somebody that has to deal with domestic violence or sexual harassment or predation knows that you can't engage everything. Sometimes avoidance is your only way of surviving. But what are you trying to accomplish, what are you afraid of, and what's at the heart of what's important? So if I am negotiating a divorce, and I am very concerned about my ex's use of substances and how that will impact our children. If I'm going to really focus on that, I'm going to have to find of bringing that up in a powerful way but one that really focuses on the real issue, which means there's going to be a lot of stuff I need to avoid. What often happens for people is they avoid, they avoid, they avoid, and when they finally take on an issue like that, everything comes out, and you lose the essence of what's important. So I think it's continually a matter of what's important, what do we need to deal with, what's the message we want to get through, what are the consequences, one way or another. Based on that, what's the right way of integrating what we avoid and what we engage? Yeah. I guess also, at some stage, there are some... I mean, you talk in that chapter about, I think it's in that chapter, about some ethical sort of boundaries or moral... Bernie: Dilemma.... dilemmas. Yeah. Bernie: [inaudible 00:16:07] talk about chapters, but that one, for example, if somebody comes to us, and it depends what our role is, but let's say we are... Just say we're "an advisor," saying that there is a professor who's seriously sexually harassing them and others, but we absolutely want to keep that quiet. Now, this is a moral quandary here.
8 We have an obligation to the person who's talked to us, but there's a larger danger out there. We've dealt with that as a profession with child abuse, with domestic violence, with threats to commit harm to others. What to avoid, what to engage and when it's all right to support avoidance, when we have to help people really get over their avoidant tendencies. Knowing that if I, as an individual, do report somebody for harassing me in a dangerous way, I could suffer serious consequences. The statistics on what happens to people who report that are not good. So that raises a lot of ethical challenges. Yeah. Okay. Tell us about some of the other paradoxes in the book. Bernie: All right. I want to talk about this, this month's issue of Scientific American, and the lead story is called "How We Conquered the Planet. Our species wielded the ultimate weapon, cooperation." One of the chapters is on competition and cooperation, and we actually know, as a field, more about this, and we're more conscious of this one, than a lot of the other paradoxes. It's amazing to me how central that is to all evolution and to all human development, as well as to our work in conflict. So if I may read just a short quote from it, the author quotes a study by Sam Bowles, who's an economist at the Santa Fe Institute who said... [inaudible 00:18:34] quote, "An optimal condition under which genetically-encoded, hyper-pro-sociality" in other words, extreme cooperation, "can propagate is, paradoxically, when groups are in conflict. Groups that have higher numbers of pro-social people who work together more effectively and thus out-compete others and pass their genes through this behaviour to the next generation." So if I can translate that, I hope it's clear, if I can translate that, he's saying, fundamental reason that we have come to dominate the planet is we're better at cooperating with people who are not related to us. And why is it important? Because it helps us to compete. And how did this develop?
9 When resources became more limited due to a climate shift many, many years ago, like thousands of years ago, like 14,000 years ago or something like that. We had to be able to protect resources to compete with those who wanted to get it, and those who had developed this genetic capacity to cooperate more effectively, were better at competing. That ultimately led us to dominate the planet, to wipe out our competitive humanoid species, etc. To me, that little scientific sense, and there's a lot of other stuff that's been written about this too, that scientific element of it is at the heart of everything we do in conflict. I think we often think that our job is to help people cooperate more effectively, and it's not. Our job is to help people cooperate compete more effectively. It is to help people integrate that. If we are out there as the people who are advocates of cooperation, as opposed to the advocates of helping people be more effective in conflict, we're going to be isolated and be used much less than then we could be used, and paradoxically therefore, we won't be able to help conflict move forward in a more constructive way. I'm trying to get my head around that. So if we see our roles as helping people cooperate, rather than helping people compete... I don't think that's what you said, is it? Bernie: No. That's what we think, though. We so often put out there, "Nonetheless, we'll help you cooperate." but that's not the way the world works. In any serious negotiation, there is an element to use negotiation [inaudible 00:21:16] that is integrated, that is looking to enlarge the pie. But there is a distributed element, as well, which is to divide that pie up, and they are not disconnected from each other. We can nicely talk about the way of working on mutual interests and joint gains, and we should, but we have to also be aware of the part of it that is all right [sounds like 00:21:43], but there's also ways in which we want something for ourselves. In order to get something for ourselves, and for you to get something for yourself, yes, we need to, at some point, enlarge the pie. But at some point, and there's a technical word for that,
10 we call it "pareto optimality," that that pie isn't going to get any larger. In fact, if we can't help people do both elements of it, we will be used much less often. So why do so many people want to value [sounds like 00:22:15] of mediators? Because they think all the facilitative, transformative, cooperative-type mediators are naïve, that it's really a hard-nosed world about competitiveness. Well, of course, that's naïve too. It is about both. The genius of what we have to offer, whatever our role is, is that we can help people do both, and in the process, we can be more constructive in how we engage in that process. I get it. I guess that links, segues nicely, into the neutrality advocacy paradox. Tell us about that one. Bernie: This is one that's particularly about conflict intervention. It can apply to all of us in conflict whether were intervenors or not, but that's particularly an important one for intervenors. Whereas most of the other paradoxes apply to all of us in conflict, as well as intervenors. That gets back to our last interview a little bit, about neutrality too. I think that we think that a critical defining factor of who we are, as third parties, is our neutrality. Yet, in no sense, except aspirational, are we really neutral, and that term itself is very confusing to people. What people want from us when we intervene in conflict is they want to be helped. And they want to know that we care about them, and they want to know that we care about them achieving their goals, their legitimate goals, you could say, I suppose, but their goals. And they want us to have some objectivity, some perspective, some dispassion. That's true whether we are advocates or mediators, whether we are in a third-party role or in a ally role. In fact, unless we are able to convey both elements, that we are able to take a dispassionate view, to not get completely bought into the conflict, to look at the broader picture, to understand and help people understand not only where they're coming from but enough of where, what they see as adversaries, are coming from, so that they can craft a more effective approach.
11 At the same time, that we genuinely care about their circumstance, not just in some abstract, objective way, but on an emotional level as well. Then we're not going to be completely accepted into their lives if we can't do that, and we won't be very effective. There are particular aspects to this as to what our particular role is, whether we're third parties or advocates, for example, but it's true for all conflict negotiators [sounds like 00:25:21]. I'm beginning to think that these paradoxes, it's as if they're things that we must value, components of... These are not options for us. These are components of a system that we need to really understand how they integrate with each other and how to bring them together in the work that we do. Bernie: Yeah. I think that's right. Our values and beliefs and purpose is extremely important. I think we sometimes mistake commitment to our fundamental values and beliefs with a commitment to specific approaches. So why is it that I value being impartial or neutral? Well, that isn't really my value. My value is to be honest, to be authentic, to be transparent as possible. As I've often said, all of our ethical guidelines, as professionals, come down to saying, "We are who we say we are. We will do what we say we will do." It's to be straight with people. But it's not like what's particularly important to me is that I'm neutral, because I don't even know what that means [inaudible 00:27:01]. Does that mean I have no beliefs? Does it mean I don't like one side more than the other? Does it mean I don't do something that might advantage one side more than the other? Does it mean that I have no structural relationship, means I would benefit with one side more than the other? I think if that's the case, we fail. As I say, the only meaning that really makes sense to me is what I would call "aspirational." If it means that I don't intend to advantage one side at the expense of the other, if I'm in a neutral role, whatever that means, again, then that makes sense. But otherwise... you know, I sometimes do things that help one party. I sometimes do things that help another. If I try
12 so hard to be neutral, that I'm not going to help one side or another, that too helps one side versus another. Usually, it helps the most powerful side. So how do we integrate these two... I was just thinking about neutrality and advocacy within the role of a conflict specialist. How do we integrate those two sides? Do we integrate them? Bernie: Well, let me speak from the point of view of a mediator. So if I'm a mediator and you and somebody else are clients, and I say to you, "Okay. I'm here to help you have the conversation you need to have, for each of you to say what you need to say, to get into the discussion you need to get into, to see what issues you want to tackle, and to approach what agreements make sense to you, if possible. "I will listen to both of you. I will do my very best to make sure you each have a chance to be heard and to hear each other. I'll do my very best to do that, and we'll go forward." Now, that sounds like a completely neutral statement, but there's nothing in there about neutrality other than that I say, "It applies to both of you." It says that I'm going to help you be an advocate, and if you are shutting up somebody else by interrupting them all the time, I'm going to be their advocate. I'm going to say, "Hang on Aled. You need to let them speak." "But what they're saying is a lie." "Well, maybe so, and you still need to let them speak." You know, I'm being an advocate in a sense. I haven't said, "I'm going to be a neutral. I'm going to be an advocate." I haven't said, "I'm going to be multi-partial." I haven't said, "I'm going to be all of your advocates." I've tried to take an integrative approach.
13 When any particular intervention happens, I tried to take an integrative approach to that too, because I don't say, "Aled would you shut up and quit being such an asshole"? Although, I've been tempted to say that to people at times. I say instead, "You may not like it, but you need to hear what they have to say, and then they need to hear what you have to say too." It sounds like, then, somebody needs to redraft the mediator code of ethics. Bernie: That's right. I think it needs to say that we are there to help. Let me ask you. What's your fundamental purpose when you walk in the room as a mediator? My fundamental purpose is to help the parties have productive conversation. Bernie: Bingo. It's mine too. That's almost exactly what I would say. So in order to have a productive conversation, you have to do more than just be neutral. You have to be engaged. You have to be an active participant. That's [inaudible 00:30:48] of having productive conversations. It's interesting, so I'm integrating now, I'm thinking about the avoidance and the engagement, but also neutrality and advocacy. So you could say that being neutral, in one sense, is actually avoiding taking up your role to facilitate a productive conversation. Bernie: I think that's the way it appears to a lot of people, and in a lot of linguistic traditions, the concept of neutrality sort of translates to "do nothing". Like being in neutral in a car. It is absolutely, for a lot of people, it feels like avoidance, and for a lot of us, it is. If I don't want to get involved in a political debate, for example, who should be the leader of the Labour Party right now, which I know is going on there, I can say, "Well, I'm neutral." What does it mean? That translates to a lot of people, "I don't care", and it's why people are sometimes suspicious of us. Yeah.
14 Bernie: And should be, by the way, sometimes. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. Emotions and logic, I'm trying to understand... Bernie: I'm trying... Go on. Bernie: I'm trying to go through some of these... Sure. You know, that's been an area where there's been an awful lot of interesting neurological research, one of which says... you know, we often think they are two different processes, that they even reside in two different parts of the brain, but in fact, emotions aren't located in one part of the brain. They kind of work throughout the brain. Logic doesn't work without emotions. The work of Antonio Damasio, who's a neuroscientist, he's written a lot of books, but one of which is called "Descartes' Error", has done these studies with people where the part of their brain that processed emotions was damaged, and found that people could still be totally rational... For example, I [inaudible 00:33:09] say, "Do you want to go out to an Italian restaurant or an Indian restaurant tonight?" You could do the pros and cons of each, but you couldn't make a decision. You need access to your emotions to apply your logic to the real world, and emotions need access to logic in order to also be able to help guide us through the world. And emotions are a guide. Logic is a guide. They're an integrated guide. So when somebody says to you, "All right. Let's keep the emotions down here." or "Let's just be rational," they're basically saying, "I want the rationality that I attach my emotions to, to
15 prevail." In fact, what we're trying to do is bring emotions and rationality together on the table in a productive way. So what is the real problem with somebody being emotional? Is it that they use it as a... No. Let me take that back. Is if it is used in a way that shuts down conversation. It shuts down interaction. You want emotions to come onto the table, to be used effectively. Sometimes it might have an immediate conversation-stopping effect. But for the long-term effect of it to be to help people engage with what's really going on, both for themselves and for others. A lot of times, I think, what mediators think is that first you deal with the emotions, and then you can be rational. Sometimes I think you first deal with the high-level of emotional energy, so then you can integrate it more. But you're always trying to help people do both. So watch somebody trying to make a decision as to whether to accept an offer, whether you're a negotiator or a mediator or whatever. It is not a simple, rational process, even if they think it is. Their emotions are very much at work. So just thinking about, in that scenario, someone struggling to make a decision, you say, "Hold on a second. Let me just get a bit of flip-chart paper out and whip together a decision tree for you. That should help." Bernie: Well, and it might. But it might also be important to say, "Well, let me do this," lay it out, and then say, "So how do you feel when you're looking at that?" which is a very different question, of course, than, "What do you think?" I think one of the best tools we can use is to use feeling words about what we think our rational processes and rational words around what we think are feeling processes.
16 So for example, when you get really upset about something, and I say to you, "Okay. Why don't you explain to me what's going on that's upset you so much." That is a very rational question about a very emotional process. When someone makes an offer, I think it's often very helpful to say, "I want you to think about that, and after you've thought about it for a while, tell me what you feel about it [inaudible 00:36:17]." What have we done? We've asked people to integrate [inaudible 00:36:21], and that's very valuable. There's lots of evidence, neurologically, that it is. But we have to overcome people's thinking that one's emotional and the other's rational. Yeah. Bernie, why write this book? Bernie: Oh. I want to give you an emotional answer to that. Because I felt I had to. I've had an experience after almost every book I've written, saying, "All right. Now I've said what I had to say. I'm done." and something starts happening, and I start thinking about something. I start thinking about it for a while, and then I feel like it's important to say. So anybody who, and it comes out of research and reading, my experiences and some tests I've done integrating my practice with teaching my practice, and all sorts of other things. But in a way, anytime you write something like this, it's a supreme act of arrogance, because you think you have something to say that that other people should want to hear, but that's what I thought. What really came to me, which I really struggled with, which was underneath this book, and I struggled with it in different ways over the years and I've tried to address in different ways, is what do we do that makes a difference? What really makes a difference for people? What do conflict intervenors do that makes a difference? Clearly there's a lot of things we can say we do tactically. We separate positions from interests. We explore the motivational basis of what people are doing. We hear people. We're empathic. We do all sorts of stuff. But in the end, I think what makes a difference is that people
17 understand themselves in conflict differently, and as a result, they can understand others differently. It's like the old saw, "Take a look at yourself so you can look at others differently." So the more I thought about that, the more I realised, all right, I think when I've really made a difference, even a little difference, people started thinking about things just a little differently. So what is it? The more I thought, and the more I read about it, the more looked more basically into human development, into evolution and some of the brain-side stuff we've talked about. What we know about economics, the more I realised that the unifying themes seem to be that we create these bifurcations that are really not bifurcations, but are paradoxes. In the sense that A is true and not A is true, and that both those things are true. And that when people can begin to understand, even if they don't use that terminology, and they seldom do, they begin to think of things differently. For example, when people begin to have the capacity to use their emotions in a more productive way, all sorts of things begin to change. And to accept other people's emotions in a more productive way, all sorts of things begin to change. Yeah. Where do you think were going to be challenged more? Around which of these paradoxes are we going to be challenged most? Bernie: Ironically, we haven't talked about that. I mean, all of them are challenging, and we'll always deal with this competition and cooperation, for example, but I think it's about community and autonomy. We are, perhaps, hardwired, although that's a funny concept. It may be a bad concept. We're certainly programmed, in many ways, to think of community in terms of the size of clans, of tribes, of smaller communities. As a result, we're not able to make decisions that need to be made if we're going to survive as a species, if you're going to avoid calamity in the future.
18 We have to be able to think of our community in a lot broader ways than we now do, because the decisions we have to make, about climate, for example, about how do we work together with people who are from what we experienced to be profoundly different tribes, will have an awful lot to do with how we prosper on this planet, or whether we even do. And I don't know what the end result of it is, but that is about the sense of being able to see our autonomy, within the ever increasingly powerful communities. And our autonomy as individuals, our autonomy as families, our autonomy as clans, we have to be able to see it in terms of how we prosper as a species, how we prosper as a world, how we prosper across multiple generations. We seem to be able to make decisions based on the next generation, perhaps, but we don't do very well beyond that, and whether we can expand that capacity is extremely important. Yeah. This isn't a book just for conflict specialists. This is a book for anyone on the planet interested in developing their thinking in this space. Bernie: I think so. I think that was true of "Staying with Conflict" too, which was about how we deal with long-term conflict. So yes. I use the tools and sometimes align with the conflict specialist, but I think it's totally accessible. Yeah. So what's your hope? Someone putting the book down, what would your hope be that they would be thinking, doing? Bernie: Besides telling all their friends to buy the book? Yeah. Bernie: I would hope that they are made to think a little harder about some of these things, that's all. Their thinking will take them wherever it will take them. I hope it will take them to a more
19 complex way of thinking, because I think the more complex our thinking becomes, the more poignant [sounds like 00:43:10] our interactions in conflict become. It's interesting, Bernie, the more interviews that I do, the more I realise how little I know, but also, the more I realise how broad the field is. I think when I got into mediation, it's a bit like investing in a toolkit. There's a box with... you open it up, and there's some tools in it. I'm seeing mediation more through that sort of lens now and recognising that there is a much broader, not just tools but manuals, how to use the tools in the right way. Bernie: So, Aled, let me ask you something. When you did your introduction, you described yourself, this place, and I loved it, as "the home of the passionate mediator." Yeah. Bernie: Tell me about that, because to me, the passion is the key to it. The passionate mediator. I think tables are turning, right? Bernie: Turn it back whenever you want. You're good, you are. You're good. I'm going to flip it around, because in one of your chapters, you talk about being a conflict avoider, being, on the one hand, a conflict avoider and on the other hand an activist, or something like that. I can relate to having similar sort of a sense of part of me being a conflict avoider, not enjoying conflict, particularly the real sort of violent manifestations of it, not just physically. Just aggression and people using power to get what they want and just feeling uncomfortable about that. Also, another part of me having the courage to kind of speak up when I think it's important.
20 I do remember, when I did this mediation training in South Africa, and I don't know whether it was the training, it was the context, South Africa, the whole Truth and Reconciliation Commission was going on at the time, where my brain was in its development. The stars that were in the sky that night, I don't know what it was, but something in me thought, "Oh. Really? You can have a productive conversation without it ending in fisticuffs?" I mean, where I grew up, if you had a conflict with someone, there were a couple of ways of sorting it out, and it didn't involve talking. So the idea that you could have a productive conversation, even when you felt so strongly that you were right or the other person was wrong, it was just a rev-,... That experience has kind of journey forward over the last 10, 15 years, pursuing what I'm pursuing, and I do, I have a belief... I genuinely think sitting people down, well, not necessarily sitting them down, but just being able to talk things through. I think we have the capacity as an advanced group of beings to be able to talk about things... I'm thinking about your paradox between community and autonomy. I agree. I think it's going to be fundamental. Sometimes I think, well, what legacy am I leaving? Every time I don't recycle an item that is potentially recyclable, I have a whole guilt com-, you know, internal conversation going on, "Oh my goodness. My grandchildren are going to go, 'So Granddad, you threw this in the bin knowing that in 100 years time there were going to be oceans of plastic."... I have those thoughts every time, which is why I'm a... You know. I don't know I'm heading now at the moment. But in terms of being the passionate sort of mediator, I think galvanising people, to help people to talk about things in a productive way and the useful way where people can understand where others are coming from. I think part of the drive of Mediator Academy is to kind of bring these resources to a place where people can have a menu of resources. It's a buffet. It's a small gasp [sounds like 00:48:18], or whatever, and they can learn, develop their thinking, because all the mediators I meet, people interested in this kind of field, are interested in learning. Bernie: So I just invite you to listen to what you just said, because it was a brilliant integration of logic and emotion. It was great. You're saying the passion is critical. It's passionate because of our values. You care so much about it, and therefore, you have to help people who come together to be able to think about this stuff in a different way.
21 I mean, it's natural. If you really listen to us when we are at our most passionate, but also when we're our most, in some ways, logical, and when we bring to the fore what is most essential to us. That was great. For me, I'm passionate about helping people in conflict. Why? Because I think that's where the world needs me to help people. All of us do. I really love mediating, and I believe it is an incredibly important tool, but it is a tool for helping people deal with conflict better. The more I've kind of said for many years now that I view myself as a conflict specialist, and I approach it a number of ways. The more I kind of looked at that and what that really means and what that implies. I realised it takes us into the fundamental questions and challenges of the human experience, and not just the human experience, but certainly the human experience. That's exciting to me. The more we can connect what we do on an everyday level to its roots, evolution, in developmental psychology, in brain science, in human interactional processes, the better we are able to do what we do in everyday life. So much of what we do is about tools, and that's fine, but if those tools are disconnected from what the root of the passion is and what the root of the experience is, then those tools won't be as effective. So I cannot use a screwdriver or wrench as well as my next-door neighbour who loves doing that sort of stuff, because it's bred into who he is. Maybe that's a silly analogy, but you understand what I mean. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. I think when you listen to some of the great orators, some of the great speeches, they seem to fuse together these concepts, these ideas. I must've listened to Martin Luther King's talk I don't know how many times, but his use of metaphor, he had the ability to integrate some of these concepts into the jangling discords of... I can't remember what, but just in that...
22 Bernie: Well, dissonance is part of the planet. Yeah. Yeah. Bernie: Yes. So great speakers do pull together these things. Two of them we haven't mentioned yet our optimism and realism, that they pull that together. Just listen to a talk by, I'm not going to get the quote exactly right, but Winston Churchill at a critical point in World War II, I think the battle of El Alamein, said something like, "Now, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end, but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." What a beautiful way of putting together optimism and realism. If you're just optimistic in the face of stuff, you're not believed, you're not credible, the optimism doesn't work. Realism without optimism is kind of empty, and somebody who says, "I'm being the hard-nosed realist here." means, "I'm optimistic about getting what I want." So great speakers combine those things. They combine principle and compromise too, Martin Luther King, Abraham Lincoln. If you just listen to the rhetoric of Obama now about the Iran deal and others, at their best, they're integrating this stuff. When he talks about race, at his best, he's being harshly realistic about the problem and offering a sense of optimism that we can make things better, and those are critical to leadership. They're critical to fiction, to poetry. They're critical to great speaking. They're critical to good drama. Yeah. Absolutely. Bernie, this has been inspiring, as always. Bernie: It's been, as always, really fun for me to talk.
23 I know people watching this will be digesting every word and reflecting on their own practice and their own goals and dreams and aspirations and their current realities and how to navigate that path between where they are now and where they want to be, and do they avoid, do they engage, do they go straight on through the desert? Who knows? Bernie: Actually, probably most paths in deserts are twisted too. [inaudible 00:54:07] true. Bernie, thank you so much for agreeing to do this again. If you haven't watched Bernie's first interview, highly recommend it. There'll be a link underneath this interview directly to it. And Bernie, just for those that haven't seen that yet, that want to get in touch with you and reach out, I know quite a few people did after the last interview, what's the best way of haranguing, harassing you? Bernie: Well, Bernie Mayer, B-E-R-N-I-E Creighton is spelled C-R-E-I- G-H-T-O-N.edu. Okay. Bernie: Or you can Google me, and something will come up. Please, just drop Bernie a line. Say "Thank you." Order a signed copy of his book. That'll increase the value by at least a few bucks. Bernie: Honestly, when people ask me to sign a copy, I'll charge less for the book. Bernie, I'm going to be the first one again to say "Thank you." Thank you so much for your time, your insight, your wisdom, and I really look forward to the next book.
24 Bernie: Thank you. Thank you, Bernie.
Neutrality and Narrative Mediation. Sara Cobb
Neutrality and Narrative Mediation Sara Cobb You're probably aware by now that I've got a bit of thing about neutrality and impartiality. Well, if you want to find out what a narrative mediator thinks
More informationThe Second European Mediation Congress Mediator Audit. Karl Mackie, Chief Executive, CEDR:
Karl Mackie, Chief Executive, CEDR: When you re thinking about the next leap forward sometimes that s a great occasion to actually take a couple of steps back and look at the assumptions you bring to the
More informationPastor's Notes. Hello
Pastor's Notes Hello We're looking at the ways you need to see God's mercy in your life. There are three emotions; shame, anger, and fear. God does not want you living your life filled with shame from
More informationMITOCW MIT24_908S17_Creole_Chapter_06_Authenticity_300k
MITOCW MIT24_908S17_Creole_Chapter_06_Authenticity_300k AUDIENCE: I wanted to give an answer to 2. MICHEL DEGRAFF: OK, yeah. AUDIENCE: So to both parts-- like, one of the parts was, like, how do the discourse
More informationDr. Henry Cloud, , #C9803 Leadership Community Dealing with Difficult People Dr. Henry Cloud and John Ortberg
Dr. Henry Cloud, 1-21-98, #C9803 Leadership Community Dealing with Difficult People Dr. Henry Cloud and John Ortberg N. Weber JOHN ORTBERG: A lot of you will know Henry from his ministry to us as a church,
More informationHOWARD: And do you remember what your father had to say about Bob Menzies, what sort of man he was?
DOUG ANTHONY ANTHONY: It goes back in 1937, really. That's when I first went to Canberra with my parents who - father who got elected and we lived at the Kurrajong Hotel and my main playground was the
More informationDeanne: Have you come across other similar writing or do you believe yours is unique in some way?
Interview about Talk That Sings Interview by Deanne with Johnella Bird re Talk that Sings September, 2005 Download Free PDF Deanne: What are the hopes and intentions you hold for readers of this book?
More informationEp #130: Lessons from Jack Canfield. Full Episode Transcript. With Your Host. Brooke Castillo. The Life Coach School Podcast with Brooke Castillo
Ep #130: Lessons from Jack Canfield Full Episode Transcript With Your Host Brooke Castillo Welcome to the Life Coach School Podcast, where it's all about real clients, real problems, and real coaching.
More informationBRIAN: No. I'm not, at all. I'm just a skinny man trapped in a fat man's body trying to follow Jesus. If I'm going to be honest.
Hello, Sid Roth here. Welcome to my world, where it's naturally supernatural. My guest prayed for a woman with no left kidney and the right one working only 2%. Doctor's verified she now has brand new
More informationFear, Emotions & False Beliefs
The Human Soul Fear, Emotions & False Beliefs Single Session Part 2 Delivered By Jesus This document is a transcript of a seminar on the subject of, how false beliefs are created within the human soul
More informationRelationship with God Faith and Prayer
Relationship with God Faith and Prayer Session 2 This document is a transcript of a seminar delivered by AJ Miller & Mary Luck (who claim to be Jesus & Mary Magdalene) as part of the Relationship with
More informationWise, Foolish, Evil Person John Ortberg & Dr. Henry Cloud
Menlo Church 950 Santa Cruz Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-323-8600 Series: This Is Us May 7, 2017 Wise, Foolish, Evil Person John Ortberg & Dr. Henry Cloud John Ortberg: I want to say hi to everybody
More informationTwice Around Podcast Episode #2 Is the American Dream Dead? Transcript
Twice Around Podcast Episode #2 Is the American Dream Dead? Transcript Female: [00:00:30] Female: I'd say definitely freedom. To me, that's the American Dream. I don't know. I mean, I never really wanted
More informationQ049 - Suzanne Stabile Page 1 of 13
Queerology Podcast Episode 49 Suzanne Stabile Air Date: 5/15/18 If you enjoy listening to Queerology, then I need your help. Here's why. I create Queerology by myself on a shoestring budget recording and
More informationSenator Fielding on ABC TV "Is Global Warming a Myth?"
Senator Fielding on ABC TV "Is Global Warming a Myth?" Australian Broadcasting Corporation Broadcast: 14/06/2009 Reporter: Barrie Cassidy Family First Senator, Stephen Fielding, joins Insiders to discuss
More informationUK Moral Distress Education Project Tilda Shalof, RN, BScN, CNCC Interviewed March 2013
UK Moral Distress Education Project Tilda Shalof, RN, BScN, CNCC Interviewed March 2013 My name is Tilda Shalof, and I'm a staff nurse at Toronto General Hospital in the medical surgical ICU. I've been
More informationLife as a Woman in the Context of Islam
Part 2 of 2: How to Build Relationships with Muslims with Darrell L. Bock and Miriam Release Date: June 2013 There's another dimension of what you raised and I want to come back to in a second as well
More informationPodcast 06: Joe Gauld: Unique Potential, Destiny, and Parents
Podcast 06: Unique Potential, Destiny, and Parents Hello, today's interview is with Joe Gauld, founder of the Hyde School. I've known Joe for 29 years and I'm very excited to be talking with him today.
More informationStudent: In my opinion, I don't think the Haitian revolution was successful.
Facilitating a Socratic Seminar Video Transcript In my opinion, I don't think the Haitian revolution was successful. Even though they gained their independence, they still had to pay back the $150 million
More informationTRANSCRIPT. Contact Repository Implementation Working Group Meeting Durban 14 July 2013
TRANSCRIPT Contact Repository Implementation Working Group Meeting Durban 14 July 2013 Attendees: Cristian Hesselman,.nl Luis Diego Esponiza, expert (Chair) Antonette Johnson,.vi (phone) Hitoshi Saito,.jp
More informationMichael Bullen. 5:31pm. Okay. So thanks Paul. Look I'm not going to go through the spiel I went through at the public enquiry meeting.
Council: Delegate: Michael Bullen. Venue: Date: February 16 Time: 5:31pm 5 Okay. So thanks Paul. Look I'm not going to go through the spiel I went through at the public enquiry meeting. No, I'm sure you've
More informationI'm just curious, even before you got that diagnosis, had you heard of this disability? Was it on your radar or what did you think was going on?
Hi Laura, welcome to the podcast. Glad to be here. Well I'm happy to bring you on. I feel like it's a long overdue conversation to talk about nonverbal learning disorder and just kind of hear your story
More informationR: euhm... I would say if someone is girly in their personality, I would say that they make themselves very vulnerable.
My personal story United Kingdom 19 Female Primary Topic: IDENTITY Topics: CHILDHOOD / FAMILY LIFE / RELATIONSHIPS SOCIETAL CONTEXT Year: 20002010 love relationship single/couple (in-) dependence (un-)
More informationMITOCW watch?v=ppqrukmvnas
MITOCW watch?v=ppqrukmvnas The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To
More informationThe Human Soul Ethics and Morality
The Human Soul Ethics and Morality This document is a transcript of a seminar delivered by AJ Miller (who claims to be Jesus) from The Human Soul series on how to live our lives in an ethical and moral
More informationEpisode 109: I m Attracted to the Same Sex, What Do I Do? (with Sam Allberry) February 12, 2018
Episode 109: I m Attracted to the Same Sex, What Do I Do? (with Sam Allberry) February 12, 2018 With me today is Sam Allberry. Sam is an editor for The Gospel Coalition, a global speaker for Ravi Zacharias
More informationChampions for Social Good Podcast
Champions for Social Good Podcast Accelerating Performance for Social Good with Root Cause Founder Andrew Wolk Jamie Serino: Hello, and welcome to the Champions for Social Good Podcast, the podcast for
More informationEthan: There's a couple of other instances like the huge raft for logs going down river...
Analyzing Complex Text Video Transcript The river doesn't only, like, symbolize, like, freedom for Huck, but it also symbolizes freedom for Jim as well. So and he's also trying to help Jim, as you can
More informationA Mind Under Government Wayne Matthews Nov. 11, 2017
A Mind Under Government Wayne Matthews Nov. 11, 2017 We can see that the Thunders are picking up around the world, and it's coming to the conclusion that the world is not ready for what is coming, really,
More informationIf the Law of Love is right, then it applies clear across the board no matter what age it is. --Maria. August 15, 1992
The Maria Monologues - 5 If the Law of Love is right, then it applies clear across the board no matter what age it is. --Maria. August 15, 1992 Introduction Maria (aka Karen Zerby, Mama, Katherine R. Smith
More informationCINDY: It was pretty bad. We grew up, it was seven children, single-parent home. My father left my mother when I was two years old, with seven kids.
1 SID: My guest can supernaturally see the potential of people. She even knows their future. She now has revelation on how you can reverse your wrong directions so you can fulfill your destiny. Is there
More informationSANDRA: I'm not special at all. What I do, anyone can do. Anyone can do.
1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural?
More informationMay 18/19, 2013 Is God Really in Control? Daniel 6 Pastor Dan Moeller
May 18/19, 2013 Is God Really in Control? Daniel 6 Pastor Dan Moeller I do appreciate this opportunity to share this morning. Lincoln Berean has had a significant impact on my life and so I've had for
More informationPastor's Notes. Hello
Pastor's Notes Hello We're going to look at an aspect of mercy that promises to bring freedom to every corner of your life. It's the truth that mercy forgives. God's mercy brings forgiveness into your
More informationWITH CYNTHIA PASQUELLA TRANSCRIPT BO EASON CONNECTION: HOW YOUR STORY OF STRUGGLE CAN SET YOU FREE
TRANSCRIPT BO EASON CONNECTION: HOW YOUR STORY OF STRUGGLE CAN SET YOU FREE INTRODUCTION Each one of us has a personal story of overcoming struggle. Each one of us has been to hell and back in our own
More informationBrexit Brits Abroad Podcast Episode 20: WHAT DOES THE DRAFT WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT MEAN FOR UK CITIZENS LIVING IN THE EU27?
Brexit Brits Abroad Podcast Episode 20: WHAT DOES THE DRAFT WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT MEAN FOR UK CITIZENS LIVING IN THE EU27? First broadcast 23 rd March 2018 About the episode Wondering what the draft withdrawal
More informationWhy Development Matters. Page 2 of 24
Welcome to our develop.me webinar called why development matters. I'm here with Jerry Hurley and Terri Taylor, the special guests of today. Thank you guys for joining us. Thanks for having us. We're about
More informationEpisode 220 Dr. Clyde Angel, John Sullivan, and Dr. Vincent Starnino: At My Core, I m Not the Same: Spiritual Injury and Military Trauma (part 1 of 2)
Episode 220 Dr. Clyde Angel, John Sullivan, and Dr. Vincent Starnino: At My Core, I m Not the Same: Spiritual Injury and Military Trauma (part 1 of 2) [00:00:08] Welcome to insocialwork. The podcast series
More informationOne Couple s Healing Story
Tim Tedder, LMHC, NCC Recorded April 10, 2016 AffairHealing.com/podcast A year and a half ago, Tim found out that his wife, Lori, was involved in an affair. That started their journey toward recovery,
More informationActuaries Institute Podcast Transcript Ethics Beyond Human Behaviour
Date: 17 August 2018 Interviewer: Anthony Tockar Guest: Tiberio Caetano Duration: 23:00min Anthony: Hello and welcome to your Actuaries Institute podcast. I'm Anthony Tockar, Director at Verge Labs and
More informationPastor's Notes. Hello
Pastor's Notes Hello We're going to talk a little bit about an application of God's love this week. Since I have been pastor here people have come to me and said, "We don't want to be a mega church we
More informationSarah, when you first suggested Anne as a guest, my heart sank.
WellnessCast Conversation with Anne Brafford, JD, MAPP, Author of Positive Professionals: Creating High-Performing, Positive Firms Through the Science of Engagement Musical Opening: So ring the bells that
More informationTranscript of Remarks by U.S. Ambassador-At-Large for War Crimes Issues, Pierre Prosper, March 28, 2002
Pierre Prosper U.S. Ambassador-At-Large for War Crimes Issues Transcript of Remarks at UN Headquarters March 28, 2002 USUN PRESS RELEASE # 46B (02) March 28, 2002 Transcript of Remarks by U.S. Ambassador-At-Large
More informationTwiceAround Podcast Episode 7: What Are Our Biases Costing Us? Transcript
TwiceAround Podcast Episode 7: What Are Our Biases Costing Us? Transcript Speaker 1: Speaker 2: Speaker 3: Speaker 4: [00:00:30] Speaker 5: Speaker 6: Speaker 7: Speaker 8: When I hear the word "bias,"
More informationSID: Now, at that time, were you spirit filled? Did you pray in tongues?
Hello, Sid Roth, here. Welcome to my world, where's it naturally supernatural. My guest is a prophetic voice to the nations, but she's also one that hears God's voice for individuals. She says God is always
More informationSID: Kevin, you have told me many times that there is an angel that comes with you to accomplish what you speak. Is that angel here now?
Hello, Sid Roth here. Welcome to my world where it's naturally supernatural. My guest died, went to heaven, but was sent back for many reasons. One of the major reasons was to reveal the secrets of angels.
More informationWhy We Shouldn't Worry. Romans 8:28. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill
Why We Shouldn't Worry Romans 8:28 Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill Probably anybody could give the introduction to this sermon. We're talking about what Jesus' death achieved for us in this present
More informationA Mind Unraveled, a Memoir by Kurt Eichenwald Page 1 of 7
Kelly Cervantes: 00:00 I'm Kelly Cervantes and this is Seizing Life. Kelly Cervantes: 00:02 (Music Playing) Kelly Cervantes: 00:13 I'm very exciting to welcome my special guest for today's episode, Kurt
More informationAl-Arabiya Television Interview With Hisham Melhem. delivered 26 January 2009
Barack Obama Al-Arabiya Television Interview With Hisham Melhem delivered 26 January 2009 AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio Mr. Melhem: Mr. President, thank you
More informationPHIL-176: DEATH. Lecture 15 - The Nature of Death (cont.); Believing You Will Die [March 6, 2007]
PRINT PHIL-176: DEATH Lecture 15 - The Nature of Death (cont.); Believing You Will Die [March 6, 2007] Chapter 1. Introduction Accommodating Sleep in the Definition of Death [00:00:00] Professor Shelly
More informationBRETT: Yes. HOWARD: And women often felt excluded and of course at that time there were a much smaller number of women in the paid work force.
JUDITH BRETT HOWARD: Bob Menzies' most famous speech, I guess, is not a speech, it's the Forgotten People broadcasts. To what extent was the Forgotten People broadcast as much a plea by him not to be forgotten
More informationGrace and peace to you from God our Father and from our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, Amen.
God s Love Leads Us to Love One Another Sermon Series: Focus: See Clearly Why We re Here Korey Van Kampen Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church (WELS) Flagstaff, AZ September 23, 2018 Grace and peace to you from
More informationSid: But you think that's something. Tell me about the person that had a transplanted eye.
1 Sid: When my next guest prays people get healed. But this is literally, I mean off the charts outrageous. When a Bible was placed on an X-ray revealing Crohn's disease, the X-ray itself supernaturally
More informationJesus Hacked: Storytelling Faith a weekly podcast from the Episcopal Diocese of Missouri
Jesus Hacked: Storytelling Faith a weekly podcast from the Episcopal Diocese of Missouri https://www.diocesemo.org/podcast Episode 030: Journey: one church's conversation about full LGBT inclusion This
More informationI QUIT; WEEK 3 Craig Groeschel
I QUIT; WEEK 3 Craig Groeschel If you are like most people chances are pretty good that you've battled one or many different fears throughout your life. So many of us, we are living in fear. What's interesting,
More informationMITOCW ocw f99-lec19_300k
MITOCW ocw-18.06-f99-lec19_300k OK, this is the second lecture on determinants. There are only three. With determinants it's a fascinating, small topic inside linear algebra. Used to be determinants were
More informationPastor's Notes. Hello
Pastor's Notes Hello We're focusing on how we fail in life and the importance of God's mercy in the light of our failures. So we need to understand that all human beings have failures. We like to think,
More information>> Marian Small: I was talking to a grade one teacher yesterday, and she was telling me
Marian Small transcripts Leadership Matters >> Marian Small: I've been asked by lots of leaders of boards, I've asked by teachers, you know, "What's the most effective thing to help us? Is it -- you know,
More informationProject ZION Podcast: Extra Shot Episode 24 Tom Morain
Project ZION Podcast: Extra Shot Episode 24 Tom Morain Hello, my name is Tom Morain, and for the purposes of this little recording, I think I would like to describe myself as a recovering seeker. I was
More informationMITOCW L21
MITOCW 7.014-2005-L21 So, we have another kind of very interesting piece of the course right now. We're going to continue to talk about genetics, except now we're going to talk about the genetics of diploid
More informationWorking with Core Beliefs of Never Good Enough
Working with Core Beliefs of Never Good Enough Laurel Parnell, PhD - Transcript - pg. 1 Working with Core Beliefs of Never Good Enough How EMDR Can Reprocess the Felt Sense of Never Good Enough with Ruth
More informationG--\5g. INTERVIEWEE: Cynthia R. Crossen MONO (X) STEREO NO. OF SIDES: 2 NO. OF TAPES: 1 of 1 INTERVIEW DATE: 3/15/95
INTERVIEWER: Kelly M. Pattison G--\5g TAPE NO.: 3.15.95 -CC INTERVIEWEE: Cynthia R. Crossen MONO (X) STEREO NO. OF SIDES: 2 NO. OF TAPES: 1 of 1 INTERVIEW DATE: 3/15/95 LOCATION: The deck of Cynthia Crossen's
More informationCASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue
More information[music] SID: Well that begs the question, does God want all of us rich?
1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural?
More informationFive Weeks to Live Do Something Great With Your Life
Five Weeks to Live Do Something Great With Your Life Unedited Transcript Patrick Morley Good morning men. Please turn in your bible's to John, chapter eight, verse 31. As we get started let's do a shout
More informationChampions for Social Good Podcast
Champions for Social Good Podcast Empowering Women & Girls with Storytelling: A Conversation with Sharon D Agostino, Founder of Say It Forward Jamie: Hello, and welcome to the Champions for Social Good
More informationLISA: Okay. So I'm half Sicilian, Apache Indian, French and English. My grandmother had been married four times. JOHN: And I'm fortunate to be alive.
1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural?
More informationA Tale of Two Kingdoms
August 10, 2014 Colossians 1:13-14 Pastor Matt Pierce A Tale of Two Kingdoms Hello, my name is Larry Adams, and I want to take a moment to personally thank you for tuning into this week's podcast where
More informationPiety. A Sermon by Rev. Grant R. Schnarr
Piety A Sermon by Rev. Grant R. Schnarr It seems dangerous to do a sermon on piety, such a bad connotation to it. It's interesting that in the book The New Jerusalem and Its Heavenly Doctrine, after laying
More informationMessianism and Messianic Jews
Part 1 of 2: What Christians Should Know About Messianic Judaism with Release Date: December 2015 Welcome to the table where we discuss issues of God and culture. I'm Executive Director for Cultural Engagement
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0"
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/2015 10:09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0" TRANSCRIPT OF TAPE OF MIKE MARSTON NEW CALL @September 2007 Grady Floyd:
More informationSID: Do you think it could be serious for a believer that the repercussion, in fact, you call something the demonic trio.
1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural?
More informationHomily by Father Danny Grover, January 13th, Baptism of the Lord
Homily by Father Danny Grover, January 13th, Baptism of the Lord In the Gospel, we have the first unveiling, really, of the Trinity. For the first time in any story in scripture the Father, the Son, and
More informationVideo 1: Worldviews: Introduction. [Keith]
Video 1: Worldviews: Introduction Hi, I'm Keith Shull, the executive director of the Arizona Christian Worldview Institute in Phoenix Arizona. You may be wondering Why do I even need to bother with all
More informationRelationship With God The World s Definition Of God
Relationship With God The World s Definition Of God This document is a transcript of a seminar delivered by AJ Miller (who claims to be Jesus) as part of The Relationship With God series of talks, describing
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE INTERVIEW WITH STAN
INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERVIEW WITH STAN LEVEL 2 Stan is a forty-three-year-old, mid-level vice president at a company we will call Textile Products, Inc. TPI is the largest manufacturer in its industry,
More informationThe Journey to Biblical Manhood Challenge 4: Fathering Session 2: How Your Child Decides How Much You Care
The Journey to Biblical Manhood Challenge 4: Fathering Session 2: How Your Child Decides How Much You Care Unedited Transcript Pat Morley Good morning, men. Today we say goodbye to a member of our Bible
More informationSo welcome Dr. Rafal. 00:36 Dr. Rafal. It's a pleasure to meet you and be part of this interview.
0 00 Cam Hi, this is Hand in Hand Show where caregivers and survivors have honest discussions about stroke. We are part of Strokefocus. Today, we're going to interview Dr. Keith who is an assistant clinical
More informationFrom Chapter Ten, Charisma (pp ) Selections from The Long Haul An Autobiography. By Myles Horton with Judith Kohl & Herbert Kohl
Selections from The Long Haul An Autobiography From Chapter Ten, Charisma (pp. 120-125) While some of the goals of the civil rights movement were not realized, many were. But the civil rights movement
More informationThe Three Critical Elements of Effective Disciplemaking
The Three Critical Elements of Effective Disciplemaking Jo Saxton MyVerge Membership >1 I do not write these things to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have
More information6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3
6.041SC Probabilistic Systems Analysis and Applied Probability, Fall 2013 Transcript Lecture 3 The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
More informationAssociation Chat: Transcript for September 21, 2018 Episode ASAE, Ethics, IP, and Speakers
Association Chat: Transcript for September 21, 2018 Episode ASAE, Ethics, IP, and Speakers KiKi L'Italien: [00:00:03] Welcome to Association Chat. KiKi L'Italien: [00:00:04] [This is] your weekly online
More informationVicki Zito Mother of Trafficking Victim
Vicki Zito Mother of Trafficking Victim Alright, just to get a quick check on a pulse of the room, how many of you are here because you have to be? Honesty is absolutely expected. Okay, that's cool. How
More informationA New Year's Resolution? Romans 7:15. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill
A New Year's Resolution? Romans 7:15 Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill One of the rituals that we went through in Ireland at the opening of a new year was the question that was always put by our
More informationMY HEART CAN T EVEN BELIEVE IT A STO RY O F SCIENCE, LO VE A ND DO W N SYNDRO M E. BY A M Y SILVERM A N
MY HEART CAN T EVEN BELIEVE IT A STO RY O F SCIENCE, LO VE A ND DO W N SYNDRO M E. BY A M Y SILVERM A N READER S GUIDE QUESTIONS AND SUBJECTS FOR DISCUSSION AFTER READING MY HEART CAN T EVEN BELIEVE IT
More informationD. Blair, The Crosshairs Trader: Hello. Thank you for your time and consideration today.
Page 1 of 14 D. Blair, The Crosshairs Trader: Hello. Thank you for your time and consideration today. C. Nenner, President of Charles Nenner Research: Yes. Hello. Good. D. Blair: In a recent interview
More informationHALLELUJAH. Words and Music by Bob Stanhope
HALLELUJAH First it wasn't and then it was. And the reason was just because. He spoke the word it all came to be Our response to what we see (should be) Hallelu, Hallelujah The way the world hangs in space
More information[music] BILL: That's true. SID: And we go back into automatic pilot.
1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural?
More informationHow Skeptics and Believers Can Connect
How Skeptics and Believers Can Connect A Dialogue Sermon between Dean Scotty McLennan and Professor Tanya Luhrmann University Public Worship Stanford Memorial Church April 28, 2013 Dean Scotty McLennan:
More informationI got a right! By Tim Sprod
I got a right! By Tim Sprod I got a right! Sam and Pete stopped. The voice from over the fence bellowed so loudly that they just stood there and looked at each other, intrigued. What's that all about?
More information21-Day Stress, Anxiety & Overwhelm Healing Intensive Day 16 Transcript
21-Day Stress, Anxiety & Overwhelm Healing Intensive Day 16 Transcript Jen: Good morning everyone and welcome to day 16. We made it, 16, woo hoo! Wow, you know, as I think back over our time together I
More informationCome_To_Worship_Week_4 Page 2 of 10
Craig: Come, let us sing for joy to the Lord. Let us shout aloud to the rock of our salvation, for the Lord is the great God, the Great King above all gods. Come, let us bow down in worship, let us kneel
More informationMITOCW watch?v=z6n7j7dlmls
MITOCW watch?v=z6n7j7dlmls The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To
More informationGrit 'n' Grace: Good Girls Breaking Bad Rules Episode #01: The Secret to Disappointment-Proofing Your Marriage
Grit 'n' Grace: Good Girls Breaking Bad Rules Episode #01: The Secret to Disappointment-Proofing Your Marriage I feel like every time I let go of expectations they find a back door, they put on a disguise
More informationTask #5 - Getting Your Story Straight The 12 Tasks of an Effective Father
Task #5 - Getting Your Story Straight The 12 Tasks of an Effective Father One day I was riding around in my automobile, and I noticed that there was a slight odor. I took note of that, and a couple of
More informationFile No WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW FIREFIGHTER THOMAS ORLANDO Interview Date: January 18, 2002 Transcribed by Laurie A.
File No. 9110473 WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW FIREFIGHTER THOMAS ORLANDO Interview Date: January 18, 2002 Transcribed by Laurie A. Collins T. ORLANDO 2 CHIEF CONGIUSTA: Today is January 18th,
More informationBBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute English Why did Singapore ban gum?
BBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute English Why did Singapore ban gum? NB: This is not a word-for-word transcript Hello and welcome to 6 Minute English. I'm and I'm. Hello. Hello,! Are you chewing gum over there?
More informationGOD INTENDED MARRIAGE
GOD INTENDED MARRIAGE Bertie Brits January 18, 2015 PRAYER Father, I want to thank You that we can pray together and I thank You, Lord, that the message that I bring today will help people to understand
More informationInterview with DAISY BATES. September 7, 1990
A-3+1 Interview number A-0349 in the Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) at The Southern Historical Collection, The Louis Round Wilson Special Collections Library, UNC-Chapel Hill. Interview
More informationHOW TO GET A WORD FROM GOD ABOUT YOU PROBLEM
HOW TO GET A WORD FROM GOD ABOUT YOU PROBLEM We're in a series called "Try Prayer". The last two weeks we talked about the reasons for prayer or the four purposes of prayer. Last week we talked about the
More information