Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being
|
|
- Neal Wilson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Notes Introduction: Categories and the Question of Being 1. Ernst Cassirer, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation, Kant-Studien, 36 (1931), 17 (translation by the present writer). 2. Marjorie Grene, Martin Heidegger (London: Bowes & Bowes, 1957), Karl Löwith, Heidegger: Denker in dürftiger Zeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1960), 78n (translation by the present writer). 4. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 3; [Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Ingtraud Görland, Vol. 25 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977), 4 5]. Hereafter, references to the original text are given in parentheses after the page number of the translation. 5. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Raymund Schmidt (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1976), A 314/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 2 3 (3 4). 7. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. Richard Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), 141; [Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, 4th edition (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1973), 195]. 8. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (196). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 10. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 (4). 11. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 143 (198). 12. Thomas Langan, Foreword, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, by Martin Heidegger, trans. J.S. Churchill (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962), xii. 13. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1971), Heidegger at times makes this principle quite explicit. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 64 (93). 15. Claude Piché, La Schématisme de la Raison Pure: Contribution au dossier Heidegger-Kant, Études Philosophiques, 1986, 83 (translation by the present writer). 16. Charles Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time, For a similar view, see William J. Richardson, Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967), Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 178
2 Notes Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 35 (40). 19. Ernst Cassirer, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics: Bemerkungen zu Martin Heideggers Kant-Interpretation, Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiii). 21. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning), trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1999) 176, 217, 317; [Beiträge zur Philosophie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 65 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1989), 250, 308, 451]. 22. Martin Heidegger, Contributions to Philosophy, 246 (351). 23. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), 8; [Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1979), 9]. See also Martin Heidegger s History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, trans. Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985), 3; [Prologomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs, Vol. 20 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1979), 3 4]. 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 25. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 4 (6). 26. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 28 (32). 27. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10). See also History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, 2 (2 3). 28. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Michael Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), 56; [Metaphysische- Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz, ed. Klaus Held, Vol. 26 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 70]. 29. Martin Heidegger, Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 30. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 19, cf. 20 (21; cf. 22). 31. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 8 9 (10). 32. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, (12 13). 33. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 144 (154). 34. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. Albert Hofstadter (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), 222; [Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Vol. 24 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1975), 317]; cf. also Being and Time, 9 (10 11). 35. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 42 (44 45); cf. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (296) and Martin Heidegger, What is a Thing? trans. W.B. Barton, Jr and Vera Deutsch (South Bend: Regnery/Gateway, 1967), 63; [Die Frage nach dem Ding (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1975), 48]. 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A , B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 147/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (82 3). 40. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 16 (18). 41. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 23 (26).
3 180 Notes 42. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 20 (23). 43. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvii (xiv). If this passage is intended to date the discovery of the importance of the schematism, Heidegger was surely forgetful when he wrote this fourth preface (1973), since he had already lectured in the winter semester of on the crucial importance of the schematism. 44. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 21 (24). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (167). 46. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 3 4 (5). 47. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 46 (62). 48. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, (160). 49. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 113 (155). 50. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 60 (84 5). 51. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (195). 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxvi. 54. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xxix. This and subsequent translations from Kant are by the present writer except where noted. All emphases within quotations throughout this work are from the original source. 55. See Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 117 (162). 56. This is to ignore entirely Kant s conception of the free play of the faculties, which he developed in the Critique of Judgement. Heidegger pays little attention to this work, although it might be argued that here Kant provides his own account of the role of freedom in transcendence. 57. Martin Heidegger, The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, (210). 58. Martin Heidegger, On the Essence of Ground, trans. William McNeill, in Pathmarks, ed. William McNeill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 126; [ Vom Wesen des Grundes, in Wegmarken (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1978), 162]. 59. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 118 (162); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (279). 60. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, (150 5). 61. Henri Declève, Heidegger et Kant (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), 35 (translation by the present writer). 62. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xvi xvii (xiii xiv). Heidegger had already made this change of mind public in 1950 in the foreword to the second edition: Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, xx (xvii). 1. Laying the Foundations of Metaphysics in Ontology 1. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 7 9 (8 12); and What is Metaphysics? in Pathmarks. 2. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 9 (10 11); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (16 17); Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (66).
4 Notes Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5 (8); see also Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 57 (70). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 9 11 (12 14); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 4 6 (8 9). 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (15 16). 7. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 18 (26). (The original is previously concealed is here made grammatically consistent as was previously concealed.) 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (26). 9. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xiii; cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 22 (31). 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (23). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 17 (23). 13. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 7 (11). 14. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (27). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 19 (27). 16. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (28). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (28). 18. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 332 (363). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 20 (29). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 24 (34). 22. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 24 (35). 23. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenology and Theology, trans. James G. Hart and John C. Maraldo, in Pathmarks, 53 4; [ Phänomenologie und Theologie, in Wegmarken, 67]; see discussion in Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, ed. Walter Biemel, Vol. 21 of Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1976), Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 26 (38). 25. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 8 9 (10). 26. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36). 27. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 (36).
5 182 Notes 28. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 25 6 (36 7). 29. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 26 (37); cf. Being and Time, 42 (45). 30. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (82). 32. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57 (83); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 15 (21). 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 57, 65 (83, 94). 34. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 60 (87); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 19 (25). 36. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 27 9 (40 2). 38. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 35 (51). 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 33 5 (48 51). 40. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xvi. 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 38 (55). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 38 (56); cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (12). 43. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (57 9); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 11 (16); Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 128 (180 1). 44. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 845/B 873; see also Immanuel Kant über die von der König. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin für das Jahr 1791 ausgesetzte Preisfrage: Welches sind die wirklichen Fortschritte, die die Metaphysik seit Leibnitzens und Wolffs Zeiten in Deutschland gemacht hat?, ed. Gerhard Lehmann, in Vol. 20 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 247/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 141 (196). 48. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 64 (92). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 62 (90). 50. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 63 (91 2); Heidegger quotes from Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 835/B Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 201 (218 19). 53. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 63 (88 9). Ronald P. Morrison has correctly noted the importance of Heidegger s attacks on representationalism in his interpretation of Kant ( Kant, Husserl, and
6 Notes 183 Heidegger on Time and the Unity of Consciousness, Philosophical and Phenomenological Research, 39, No. 2 (1978), 182). 54. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (21). 55. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 16 (22). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 30 1 (44). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (19). 58. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 14 (20). 59. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 64 5, 330 (68 9, 360 1). 60. Friedrich H. Jacobi, Vol. 2 of Werke, ed. R.F. Köpen (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968), G.W.F. Hegel, Logik, Vol. 4 of Sämtliche Werke, ed. H. Glockner (Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1965), Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Will und Vorstellung, Vols 2 and 3 of Sämtliche Werke, ed. A. Hübscher (Wiesbaden: F.U. Brockhaus, 1972), Vol. 2: 494 8, Vol. 3: Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 67 8 (98); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 22 3 (30 1), Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164 (209), and On the Essence of Ground, in Pathmarks, 116 (146). 64. Ronald P. Morrison, Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger on Time and the Unity of Consciousness, Robert W. Burch, Heidegger and the Bounds of Sense, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 6, No. 1 (1975), Grace A. de Laguna, On Existence and the Human World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), Sandra B. Rosenthal and Patrick L. Bourgeois, Lewis, Heidegger and Ontological Presence, Philosophy Today, 27, No. 4/4 (1983), Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 24, 63 (27, 67 8). 69. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 22 (30). 70. Jules Vuillemin, L héritage Kantien et la révolution Copernicienne (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1954), Mikel Dufrenne, Heidegger et Kant, Revue de la métaphysique et de morale, 54 (1949), 5; La Notion d a priori (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959), Henri Declève, Heidegger et Kant, William F. Vallicella, Kant, Heidegger and the Problem of the Thing in Itself, International Philosophical Quarterly, 23 (1983), Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 68 (99); cf. Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, 164 (209 10). 75. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 541/B 569, A 558/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 252, B William Vallicella points out that Heidegger s rejection of the concept of the thing in itself gives the appearance an independence that is incompatible with its status as a representation. This is correct in so far as the concept
7 184 Notes of the appearance needs the purely negative concept of the thing in itself as a corrective. However, Vallicella goes too far when he claims that Heidegger thus transforms appearances into things in themselves. (William F. Vallicella, Kant, Heidegger and the Problem of the Thing in Itself, ) 2. The Transcendental Aesthetic and the Unity of the Faculties 1. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 40 (59). 2. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 58 (84). 3. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 70 1 (102). 4. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 79 (84 5); see also 80 1, 103 (86, 111). 5. Cf. Chapter 1 of the present work. 6. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 20/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 23/B 38, A 30/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 71 (103). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 72 (104). 10. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 51/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 85 (123). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 85 (123). 13. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 266/B 322; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 86 (124). 14. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 97 (125 7). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 (127 8); see also Heidegger s Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 9 (128). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 88 (127). 18. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 25/B 39 40, A 32/B 47 8; cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 80 (117). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 89 (129); see also Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92, 76 (131, 110). 21. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 34/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 100 (145).
8 Notes Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 102 (148 9); Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 104 (151); cf. also 183 (269). 25. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 104 (152); see also Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92 3 (133 4). 31. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (134). 32. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). By the time he came to write Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Heidegger had dropped his objection to the term synopsis, so that in this work it serves for what is called syndosis in the lectures. (Cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 100 (137).) Furthermore, it should be noted that although Heidegger does not repeat this discussion of syndosis in the note to 26 for Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, he clearly had not abandoned its application to this section. (Cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 102n (140 1n).) 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 93 (135). 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 94 5 (136 7). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 92 (134). 38. Paul Natorp, Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften (Berlin and Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1910), 276; cf. reference in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 91 (132). 39. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B This is not intended to deny that space and time as forms of intuition are unities in some sense before the understanding acts upon them. However, they are unities through being singular, not through being a combination. The consciousness of space and time as unified manifolds, that is, space and time as intuited, must always be according to the categories. 47. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B
9 186 Notes 48. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 78 (113 14). 49. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 24/B 38 9 A 31/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 25/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 31 2/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 19/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 320/B Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery According to which Any New Critique of Pure Reason Has Been Made Superfluous by an Earlier One. In The Kant- Eberhard Controversy, ed. and trans. Henry E. Allison (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973), 136; [Über eine Entdeckung, nach der alle neue Kritik der reinen Vernunft durch eine ältere entbehrlich gemacht werden soll, in Vol. 8 of Akademie-Ausgabe (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1923), 222]. 57. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 140/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 197/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery, 135 (221 2). 65. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, On a Discovery, 136 (222 3). 67. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 154, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 142/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 95 (138). 3. Transcendental Logic and the Problem of Judgement 1. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 (166). 2. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 86/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 114 (166). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (167); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 48 (65). 6. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 115 (168). 7. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 68/B 93; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (170 1).
10 Notes Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 69/B 93 4; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (170 1). 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 118 (172). 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 118 (173). 13. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (174 5); cf. also Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 55 6/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 54 5/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 122 (179). 16. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 123 (180 1). 17. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (182 4). 18. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 127 (186). 19. Cf. Chapter 1 of the present volume. 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 129 (189). 21. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 58/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (189 90). 23. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (21). 24. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 15 (20). 25. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 14 (20). 26. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, (157 8). 27. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 148 (158 9). 28. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 149 (159). 29. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 206 (293 4). 30. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, (294). 31. See a parallel discussion in Being and Time, (224 5). 32. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 201 (218 19). 33. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, (226). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 129 (189 90). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 131 (193). 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 138 (203). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 133 (195). 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 845 6/B
11 188 Notes 39. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 136 ( ). 40. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 140 (205). 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (206). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 150 (220). 43. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 3), in Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe (Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter, 1923), Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 1), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 91. ( Verschiedenen here could mean many objects rather than many representations, but this does not make any significant change to the meaning of the passage.) 45. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 2), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, 91. Heidegger discusses this in his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (225 7). 46. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 6), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Cf. Heidegger s discussion in his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (228 36). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 153 (236); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 37 (49). 50. Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 5), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 3), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 56/B 80, A 86 7/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 164 (241). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 162 (238 9). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (239). 58. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 142 3, 150 (209, 220). 59. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 163 (240); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 (51). 60. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 168 (247). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (248). 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (250); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 (51). 64. Immanuel Kant, Reflexionen Kants zur kritischen Philosophie, ed. Benno Erdmann (Leipzig: Fues s Verlag, 1882), Book 2, (Reflection No. 544); cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (249) and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 38 9 (51 2).
12 Notes Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 170 (249 50). 66. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 320/B Immanuel Kant, Logik ( 4), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 171 (251). 69. For the use of the term Metaphysical Deduction in reference to deducing the categories from the table of judgements, see Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 128; cf. also A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (252); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 46 (62). 72. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 172 (253). 73. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (312). 74. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 69/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 178 (262). 76. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 178 (261 2). 77. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 176 7; cf. also B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 245; cf. also A 247/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 254/B The Relation of the Categories to Ontological Synthesis 1. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 76 80/B For the application of the phrase Metaphysical Deduction to this section, see B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 181 (265); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 3 (57). 3. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27). 4. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27). The quotation from Kant is from the Logik ( 17), Vol. 9 of Akademie-Ausgabe, See the discussion of reflection in Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 36 7 (49); and Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 156 (229). 6. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (28). 7. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, 28 9 (32 3). 8. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (28). 9. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 (57). 10. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 42 (57). 11. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 43 (57). 12. Heidegger does not indeed make it perfectly obvious that there is both an empirical and a pure veritative synthesis. This has led Henri Declève to claim mistakenly that veritative refers solely to the a priori synthesis (Heidegger et Kant, 122). However it is clear that Heidegger s earlier reference
13 190 Notes to veritative synthesis (Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 20 (27)) is to an empirical synthesis, for in this veritative synthesis a being is made manifest. 13. In his Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (311), Heidegger also equates the pure predicative synthesis with the veritative synthesis. However, since these lectures contain no sure reference to the set of the veritative, apophantic and predicative syntheses, we can put this inconsistency down to Heidegger not having stabilized his terminology in this respect. 14. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 183 (269). 16. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 77/B Heidegger does leave open the possibility of this synthesis being a more broadly conceived kind of syndosis, but he discounts the possibility of this synthesis being mere syndosis as had been discussed in his treatment of the Transcendental Aesthetic. Cf. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 185, (272, 276). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 185 (272 3); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 44 (59). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 187 (275); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 44 5 (60). 22. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B By the time he came to revise the Critique of Pure Reason for its second edition, Kant had decided that the function of the mere understanding was also a synthesis, but a purely intellectual, non-imaginative synthesis. See Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 94; cf. also A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 119; but see A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 15/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 189 (278); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 96 (132). 29. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 147 (216); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, (155). 30. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 130, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 103; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 191 (281). 32. Immanuel Kant, Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht ( 28), Vol. 7 of Akademie Ausgabe, 167. This definition is also given in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, at B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 189 (278); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 91 (123 4). 34. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 140/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B 104.
14 Notes Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (282 3). 39. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (283). 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 193 (284). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 192 (284). 43. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78 9/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 194 (286). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 196 (288). 46. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 79/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 196 (289). (The translation breaks the second sentence of the original German into two.) 48. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (289). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 197 (289). There is an error in the translation here, which I have emended: Emad and Maly translate vermittelst as by no means. In their translation of the passage by Kant, they properly translate vermittelst as by means of, and this is the term that Heidegger is pointing out, rather than the ganz und gar nicht of his own text a few lines earlier, which they translate as by no means. 50. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 197 (290). 51. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (290). 52. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 79/B See Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (290 3). 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (291 2). 57. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 198 (291). 58. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 81/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (295). 60. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 201 (295 6). 61. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (296). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 203 (299).
15 192 Notes 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 205 (301). 64. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 205 (302). 5. The Problem of the Transcendental Deduction 1. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 76 80/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 85/B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 84 5/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 209 (309). 5. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 208 (307). 6. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A xii. 7. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 209 (307 8). 8. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (312 13). 9. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (313). 10. Martin Heidegger, Basic Problems of Phenomenology, 206 (294). 11. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 213 (314). Emad and Maly use the hypenated ob-ject to stand for Objekt rather than Gegenstand. 12. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 212 (313); cf. Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B xvi, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 210 (310); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 61 (83). 15. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 211 (311 12). 16. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 89/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 224 (330); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 61 (83 4). 18. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (315). 19. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 224 (330). 20. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (318). 21. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 216 (318). 22. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 92/B 124 5; (reading, with Erdmann, Vorstellungen for Vorstellung in the first sentence). 23. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 92/B 125; discussed in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (319 20); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 50 1 (68).
16 Notes Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (321); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 51 (69). 25. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 93/B 125 6; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (321). 26. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (321 2). 27. Martin Heidegger, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 51 (69). Taft s term taking in stride translates hinnehmende, which I read as receptive. I have also added the missing t in nicht. 28. Charles Sherover has rightly noted that Heidegger emphasizes that the doctrine of the transcendental object is about the ontological structures that are involved in the appearing of an object as an object (Heidegger, Kant and Time, 91). 29. Mikel Dufrenne, La Notion d a priori (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959), Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 218 (322). 31. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 128; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (322 3). 32. This conception of a real definition differs from the real definition that Kant said was not possible for the categories. Real definition in this latter context is the definite relation of a concept to a specific object, such as the relation of the concept of a triangle to the presentation of that triangle in intuition (Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 241 2). 33. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323). 34. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 49 (66). 35. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 219 (323). I have corrected the translation here: Emad and Maly s text reads sometimes only notions and something categories. 36. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (324). 37. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 220 (324); cf. also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 49 (66 7). 38. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 227 (335). 40. This threefold synthesis as such is entirely lacking in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. 41. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 230 (339). 42. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 230 (339 40); see also Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (336).
17 194 Notes 44. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 228 (337). 45. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338). 46. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 231 (340 1); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, (171 2). 49. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, (173). 50. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 245, B Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (341 2); citing Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 78/B Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 232 (342 3). 54. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 232 (343). 55. For a discussion of Heidegger s attempted proof of syndosis with the context of the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, see Chapter 2 of the present work. 56. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 231 (341). 57. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 99; discussed in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (343 5) and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, (173 4). 59. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 234 (346). 60. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A ; Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 235 (347). 61. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 235 (347). 62. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (347 8); cf. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 126 (174). 63. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 236 (348). 64. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 229 (338). 65. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 58 (84). 67. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, B 160n. 68. It seems silly to say that space and time cannot be understood without being understood, but this is an exact statement of the problem. The radical incomprehensibility of time and space in themselves would seem to be the reason why in the second edition Kant emphasized (especially in
18 Notes 195 the section headings) that he was dealing with the concepts of space and time (note the changes at Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 20, B 34). 69. This concerns the actual consistency of images, not the consciousness of their sameness, which belongs to the synthesis of recognition. 70. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (352); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 127 (176). 73. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353). 74. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353). 75. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 239 (353); see also Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 128 (177). 76. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 102; cited in Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (354). 78. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354); Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 128 (177). 79. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354). 80. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (354). 81. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A This assertion that apperception is the basis of the purest objective unity might be taken as an argument against Heidegger s claim that time has its own unity that is not dependent upon understanding. However, Heidegger could argue that it is only the concepts of space and time that are at issue here, not their unities as intuitions. 87. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A 111; (reading, with Erdmann, oben for the first eben in the second sentence). 89. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, A Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 240 (355). 91. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 258 (381). 92. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, (355). 93. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 241 (355). 94. Martin Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant s Critique of Pure Reason, 241 (356 7).
The Boundaries of Hegel s Criticism of Kant s Concept of the Noumenal
Arthur Kok, Tilburg The Boundaries of Hegel s Criticism of Kant s Concept of the Noumenal Kant conceives of experience as the synthesis of understanding and intuition. Hegel argues that because Kant is
More information1 Therapy for metaphysics
1 Therapy for metaphysics As its name suggests, this book proposes a novel strategy by which to avoid metaphysics. There is nothing new about trying to avoid metaphysics, of course in the memorable words
More informationHeidegger s Interpretation of Kant
Heidegger s Interpretation of Kant Renewing Philosophy General Editor: Gary Banham Titles include: Kyriaki Goudeli CHALLENGES TO GERMAN IDEALISM Schelling, Fichte and Kant Keekok Lee PHILOSOPHY AND REVOLUTIONS
More informationFilippo Casati Naoya Fujikawa BETTER THAN ZILCH?
Logic and Logical Philosophy Volume 24 (2015), 255 264 DOI: 10.12775/LLP.2015.004 Filippo Casati Naoya Fujikawa BETTER THAN ZILCH? Abstract. In their paper Zilch, Oliver and Smiley claim that the word
More informationThis is a preprint copy of a paper that was published in Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2010):
This is a preprint copy of a paper that was published in Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2010): 150-169. The Phenomenological Kant: Heidegger s Interest in Transcendental Philosophy
More informationToward a Metaphysical Freedom: Heidegger s Project of a Metaphysics of Dasein i François Jaran
Toward a Metaphysical Freedom: Heidegger s Project of a Metaphysics of Dasein i François Jaran International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 18(2), 205 227 [Pre-print] Abstract The Metaphysics of
More informationThe Simultaneity of the Three Principles in the Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre Michael Kolkman University of Warwick
The Simultaneity of the Three Principles in the Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre Michael Kolkman University of Warwick 1. Introduction The Tathandlung with which the Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre
More informationPRACTICE ANO REALIZATION
PRACTICE ANO REALIZATION PRACTICE AND REALIZATION STUDIES IN KANT'S MORAL PHILOSOPHY by NATHAN ROTENSTREICH 1979 MARTINUS NIJHOFF THE HAGUE / BOSTON / LONDON Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication
More informationCOURSE SYLLABUS PHL 550: BEING AND TIME I
1 COURSE SYLLABUS PHL 550: BEING AND TIME I Course/Section: PHL 550/101 Course Title: Being and Time I Time/Place: Tuesdays 1:00-4:10, Clifton 140 Instructor: Will McNeill Office: 2352 N. Clifton, Suite
More informationJames Hebbeler. Curriculum Vitae
Department of Philosophy telephone: 610-660-1548 Saint Joseph s University fax: 610-660-1087 5600 City Avenue email: jhebbele@sju.edu Philadelphia, PA 19131 Employment Education Associate Professor, Saint
More informationCOURSE SYLLABUS PHL 551: BEING AND TIME II
1 Course/Section: PHL 551/201 Course Title: Being and Time II Time/Place: Tuesdays 1:00-4:00, Clifton 155 Instructor: Will McNeill Office: 2352 N. Clifton, Suite 150.3 Office Hours: Fridays, by appointment
More informationFrom Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
More informationHEIDEGGER S AFFINITY for Aristotle s and Kant s works is
HEIDEGGER S KANTIAN READING OF ARISTOTLE S THEOLOGIKE EPISTEME FRANÇOIS JARAN Aristotle s Metaphysics is probably further than we ourselves are today in philosophy. Martin Heidegger, Einleitung in die
More informationAnother Scandal of Philosophy *
Another Scandal of Philosophy * Introduction Kant in a footnote in the Critique of Pure Reason famously called it a scandal to philosophy that philosophy remained at a loss to refute the epistemic sceptic
More informationCONTENTS III SYNTHETIC A PRIORI JUDGEMENTS. PREFACE CHAPTER INTRODUCTldN
PREFACE I INTRODUCTldN CONTENTS IS I. Kant and his critics 37 z. The patchwork theory 38 3. Extreme and moderate views 40 4. Consequences of the patchwork theory 4Z S. Kant's own view of the Kritik 43
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationStrawson and Kant on Being I
Papers Strawson and Kant on Being I Jan Kuneš Abstract: Strawson developed his descriptive metaphysics in close relation to Kant s metaphysics of experience which can be understood as a particular version
More information[This is the submitted manuscript of Jussi Backman, The Absent. Foundation: Heidegger on the Rationality of Being, Philosophy Today 49
[This is the submitted manuscript of Jussi Backman, The Absent Foundation: Heidegger on the Rationality of Being, Philosophy Today 49 (5): 175 84, available in published form at http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200549supplement22.]
More informationIn Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of
Glasgow s Conception of Kantian Humanity Richard Dean ABSTRACT: In Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of the humanity formulation of the Categorical Imperative.
More informationFIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS
FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS Autumn 2012, University of Oslo Thursdays, 14 16, Georg Morgenstiernes hus 219, Blindern Toni Kannisto t.t.kannisto@ifikk.uio.no SHORT PLAN 1 23/8:
More informationSpinoza and German Idealism
Spinoza and German Idealism There can be little doubt that without Spinoza, German Idealism would have been just as impossible as it would have been without Kant. Yet the precise nature of Spinoza s influence
More informationThe Hermeneutics of Finitude
Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Humanities DOCTORAL THESES Zsuzsanna Mariann Lengyel The Hermeneutics of Finitude The Time as a Philosophical Problem in Martin Heidegger s Path of Thinking Philosophy
More informationCOURSE GOALS: PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # Offices Hours:
PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # 337-7076 Offices Hours: 1) Mon. 11:30-1:30. 2) Tues. 11:30-12:30. 3) By Appointment. COURSE GOALS: As
More informationthat calls not only the Christian community but also all humanity to do justice in faith/trust.
A HERMENEUTICS OF DISCLOSURE AND JUSTICE: A READING OF HERMAN WAETJEN S THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS: SALVATION AS JUSTICE AND THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE LAW Douglas R. McGaughey Willamette University Salem,
More informationKant s insight and kant s concept of a
kant s insight and kant s Artigos I / Articles I Kant s insight and kant s concept of a transcendental logic Pedro M. S. Alves * Universidade de Lisboa Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa Der
More informationKant and the Problem of Metaphysics 1. By Tom Cumming
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics 1 By Tom Cumming Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics represents Martin Heidegger's first attempt at an interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781). This
More informationIntroduction. Karl Ameriks and Otfried Höffe
Introduction Karl Ameriks and Otfried Höffe I. Background The widespread influence of Immanuel Kant s moral and legal philosophy is a striking exception to the division that can often be found between
More informationDenis Seron. Review of: K. Mulligan, Wittgenstein et la philosophie austro-allemande (Paris: Vrin, 2012). Dialectica
1 Denis Seron. Review of: K. Mulligan, Wittgenstein et la philosophie austro-allemande (Paris: Vrin, 2012). Dialectica, Volume 70, Issue 1 (March 2016): 125 128. Wittgenstein is usually regarded at once
More informationThursday, November 30, 17. Hegel s Idealism
Hegel s Idealism G. W. F. Hegel Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was perhaps the last great philosophical system builder. His distinctively dynamic form of idealism set the stage for other
More informationKANT S DOCTRINE OF TRANSCENDENTAL ILLUSION
KANT S DOCTRINE OF TRANSCENDENTAL ILLUSION This major study of Kant provides a detailed examination of the development and function of the doctrine of transcendental illusion in his theoretical philosophy.
More informationMAIMON'S CRITICISM OF REINHOLD'S "SATZ DES BEWUSSTSEINS"
Rolf Peter Horstmann MAIMON'S CRITICISM OF REINHOLD'S "SATZ DES BEWUSSTSEINS" In a letter of January 1795 Schelling wrote Hegel: "Philosophy is not at an end yet. Kant has given the results, the premises
More informationEdmund Husserl s Transcendental Phenomenology by Wendell Allan A. Marinay
Edmund Husserl s Transcendental Phenomenology by Wendell Allan A. Marinay We remember Edmund Husserl as a philosopher who had a great influence on known phenomenologists like Max Scheler, Edith Stein,
More informationTHE 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF. ISSEI International Society for the Study of European Ideas in cooperation with the University of Cyprus
THE 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ISSEI International Society for the Study of European Ideas in cooperation with the University of Cyprus Filon Ktenides Doctoral student in the Department of Philosophy
More informationThe Copernican Shift and Theory of Knowledge in Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl.
The Copernican Shift and Theory of Knowledge in Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl. Matthew O Neill. BA in Politics & International Studies and Philosophy, Murdoch University, 2012. This thesis is presented
More informationIntroduction 1. THE EMERGENCE OF THE CRITIQUE
PAUL GUYER Introduction 1. THE EMERGENCE OF THE CRITIQUE The Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant (1724 1804)iswithout question one of the landmarks of the entire history of Western philosophy, comparable
More informationTuesday, November 11, Hegel s Idealism
Hegel s Idealism G. W. F. Hegel Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) was perhaps the last great philosophical system builder. His distinctively dynamic form of idealism set the stage for other
More informationThe Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism
The Greatest Mistake: A Case for the Failure of Hegel s Idealism What is a great mistake? Nietzsche once said that a great error is worth more than a multitude of trivial truths. A truly great mistake
More information1 Little Newnham Corpus Christi College. United Kingdom
THOMAS C. LAND 1 Little Newnham Corpus Christi College Malting Lane Cambridge, CB2 1RH Cambridge, CB3 9HF United Kingdom United Kingdom ++44 1223 767002 ++44 1223 767002 tcl37@cam.ac.uk ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT
More informationFreedom on This and the Other Side of Kant is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Freedom on This and the Other Side of Kant is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Freedom on This and the Other Side of Kant Charles Taylor
More informationKant s Criticism of Rational Psychology and the Existential Aspect of His Ego Theory
Bulletin of Aichi Univ. of Education, 63(Humanities and Social Sciences), pp. 135-143, March, 2014 Kant s Criticism of Rational Psychology and the Existential Aspect of His Ego Theory Professor Emeritus
More informationHeidegger's Reflection on Aletheia: Merely a Terminological Shift?
Heidegger's Reflection on Aletheia: Merely a Terminological Shift? GARY STEINER Yale University In "The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking," Heidegger discusses the need to move beyond prior philosophical
More information1/12. The A Paralogisms
1/12 The A Paralogisms The character of the Paralogisms is described early in the chapter. Kant describes them as being syllogisms which contain no empirical premises and states that in them we conclude
More informationXI SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS, NEGATION, AND DISAGREEMENT
Meeting of the Aristotelian Society held at Senate House, University of London, on 24 April 2017 at 5:30 p.m. XI SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS, NEGATION, AND DISAGREEMENT SEBASTIAN RÖDL It seems obvious that judgement
More informationHegel on Fichte s Conception of Practical Self-Consciousness 1 A Fundamental Criticism of the Sittenlehre in the Differenz-Schrift (1801) 2
The 3rd BESETO Conference of Philosophy Session 15 Hegel on Fichte s Conception of Practical Self-Consciousness 1 A Fundamental Criticism of the Sittenlehre in the Differenz-Schrift (1801) 2 LIU Zhe Peking
More informationThe Construction of Juridical Space: Kant's Analogy of Relation in The. Metaphysics of Morals
The Construction of Juridical Space: Kant's Analogy of Relation in The Metaphysics of Morals Douglas Moggach Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol.7, Modern Philosophy, ed. Mark
More informationInternational Phenomenological Society
International Phenomenological Society Things in Themselves Author(s): Robert Merrihew Adams Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 801-825 Published by: International
More informationKant and the Problem of Personal Identity Jacqueline Mariña
Jacqueline Mariña 1 Kant and the Problem of Personal Identity Jacqueline Mariña How do I know that I am the same I today as the person who first conceived of this specific project over two years ago? The
More informationHuman Dignity 1. Universität Zürich Institut für Sozialethik Prof. Dr. Johannes Fischer November in Zürich.
Human Dignity 1 Roberto Andorno invited me to present at the beginning of this conference some considerations about a fundamental question the concept of human dignity is connected with. I gladly accept
More informationThe Groundwork, the Second Critique, Pure Practical Reason and Motivation
金沢星稜大学論集第 48 巻第 1 号平成 26 年 8 月 35 The Groundwork, the Second Critique, Pure Practical Reason and Motivation Shohei Edamura Introduction In this paper, I will critically examine Christine Korsgaard s claim
More informationCritique in German Philosophy
Critique in German Philosophy From Kant to Schopenhauer J. Colin McQuillan, St. Mary s University In the Preface to the first (A) edition of the Critique of Pure Reason (1781), Kant calls his age the genuine
More informationReal predicates and existential judgements
Real predicates and existential judgements Ralf M. Bader Merton College, University of Oxford 1 Real predicates One of the central commitments of Kant s (pre-critical as well as Critical) modal theory
More informationPleasure and motivation in Kant s
Pleasure and motivation in Kant s practical philosophy Maria Borges 1 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Pesquisadora do CNPq. 1. Can we act without any sensible incentive? In the article Kant and
More informationFor example brain science can tell what is happening in one s brain when one is falling in love
Summary Husserl always characterized his phenomenology as the only method for the strict grounding of science. Therefore phenomenology has often been criticized as an obsession with the system of absolutely
More informationWhitehead s Unique Approach. to the Topic of Consciousness
Whitehead s Unique Approach 137 4 Whitehead s Unique Approach to the Topic of Consciousness Anderson Weekes Granting the reader a foretaste of his cosmological scheme, Whitehead announces at the end of
More informationDasein's Fulfillment: The Intentionality of Authenticity
Dasein's Fulfillment: The Intentionality of Authenticity Leslie MacAvoy McGill University The reader who attempts a hermeneutic understanding of Heidegger's Being and Time (SZ) has traditionally faced
More informationIMAGINATION AND REFLECTION: INTERSUBJECTIVITY FICHTE'S: GRUNDLAGE OF 1794
IMAGINATION AND REFLECTION: INTERSUBJECTIVITY FICHTE'S: GRUNDLAGE OF 1794 MARTINUS NIJHOFF PHILOSOPHY LIBRARY VOLUMES Other volumes in the series: 1. D. Lamb, Hegel- From Foundation to system. 1980. ISBN
More informationKant s Critical Thoughts on Freedom from a Contemporary Perspective -
Kant s Critical Thoughts on Freedom from a Contemporary Perspective - To what extent are these thoughts of practical philosophical significance for us? Gerhard Bos Student Number: 0354422 Master s Thesis
More informationPhilosopher, Translator, Teacher
130 Philosopher, Translator, Teacher Steven M. Fowler, M.H. Karl-Franzens University, Graz Abstract.-This paper offers two examples of the difficulties of translation, one from Wittgenstein and the other
More information1/9. The First Analogy
1/9 The First Analogy So far we have looked at the mathematical principles but now we are going to turn to the dynamical principles, of which there are two sorts, the Analogies of Experience and the Postulates
More informationHEIDEGGER. 2nd Edition. the cambridge companion to
the cambridge companion to HEIDEGGER 2nd Edition Martin Heidegger is now widely recognized alongside Wittgenstein as one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century. He transformed mainstream
More informationOn Hegel s Concept of the Absolute. Hegel in Mutlak Kavramı Üzerine
2010/15 11 Enver ORMAN On Hegel s Concept of the Absolute Abstract The concept of absolute is one of the key concepts in order to understand Hegel s philosophical system. In the context of Hegelian dialectics
More informationTHE EVENT OF DEATH: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL ENQUIRY
MARTINUS NIJHOFF PHILOSOPHY LIBRARY VOLUME 23 For a complete list of volumes in this series see final page of the volume. The Event of Death: A Phenomenological Enquiry by Ingrid Leman-Stefanovic 1987
More informationTHE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY
THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY Subhankari Pati Research Scholar Pondicherry University, Pondicherry The present aim of this paper is to highlights the shortcomings in Kant
More informationDr. Eric Schumacher 1
International Journal of Philosophy and Theology June 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 78-84 ISSN: 2333-5750 (Print), 2333-5769 (Online) Copyright The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research
More informationWhat is Formal in Husserl s Logical Investigations?
What is Formal in Husserl s Logical Investigations? Gianfranco Soldati 1. Language and Ontology Not so long ago it was common to claim that ontological questions ought to be solved by an analysis of language.
More informationHeidegger s Anxiety: On the Role of Mood in Phenomenological Method
Bulletin d analyse phénoménologique XII 1, 2016 ISSN 1782-2041 http://popups.ulg.ac.be/1782-2041/ Heidegger s Anxiety: On the Role of Mood in Phenomenological Method By R. MATTHEW SHOCKEY Indiana University
More informationLecture 18: Rationalism
Lecture 18: Rationalism I. INTRODUCTION A. Introduction Descartes notion of innate ideas is consistent with rationalism Rationalism is a view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.
More informationNOTES. CPR CPrR G MM 8. G G G 389.
NOTES CJ CPR CPrR G MM ABBREVIA TIONS Critique of Judgment (1790) Critique oj Pllre Reason (1781) Critique of Practical Reason (1788) Groundwork of the Metaphysic oj Morals (178S) The Metaphysic oj Morals
More informationPHIL History of Modern Philosophy Spring 2016
PHIL 004-001 History of Modern Philosophy Spring 2016 Course Description This course is an introduction to a few central themes in philosophy in the 17th and 18th centuries, and to some of the crucial
More informationREVIEW ARTICLE Jeff Malpas, Heidegger s Topology MIT Press, 2006
PARRHESIA NUMBER 5 2008 73-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Jeff Malpas, Heidegger s Topology MIT Press, 2006 Miguel de Beistegui This is a book about place, and about the place we ought to attribute to place. It is also,
More informationTHE FICHTEAN IDEA OF THE SCIENCE OF KNOWLEDGE. by Jean Hyppolite*
75 76 THE FICHTEAN IDEA OF THE SCIENCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE HUSSERLIAN PROJECT by Jean Hyppolite* Translated from the French by Tom Nemeth Introduction to Hyppolite. The following article by Hyppolite
More informationCharles Hartshorne argues that Kant s criticisms of Anselm s ontological
Aporia vol. 18 no. 2 2008 The Ontological Parody: A Reply to Joshua Ernst s Charles Hartshorne and the Ontological Argument Charles Hartshorne argues that Kant s criticisms of Anselm s ontological argument
More informationKant and his Successors
Kant and his Successors G. J. Mattey Winter, 2011 / Philosophy 151 The Sorry State of Metaphysics Kant s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) was an attempt to put metaphysics on a scientific basis. Metaphysics
More informationChapter 24. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Concepts of Being, Non-being and Becoming
Chapter 24 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Concepts of Being, Non-being and Becoming Key Words: Romanticism, Geist, Spirit, absolute, immediacy, teleological causality, noumena, dialectical method,
More informationThursday, March 07, Draft. Martin Heidegger s Encounter Methodology: Kant By Daniel Fidel Ferrer.
Thursday, March 07, 2002. Draft. Martin Heidegger s Encounter Methodology: Kant By Daniel Fidel Ferrer. Discovering 'Kant in himself' is to be left to Kant philology. Martin Heidegger Abstract Martin Heidegger
More informationJitendra Nath Mohanty
Jitendra Nath Mohanty Professor of Philosophy (emeritus, 2009) Department of Philosophy Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA Phone: 215-654-1263 Email: mohanty@bc.edu Education Ph.D., University
More informationThis paper serves as an enquiry into whether or not a theory of metaphysics can grow
Mark B. Rasmuson For Harrison Kleiner s Kant and His Successors and Utah State s Fourth Annual Languages, Philosophy, and Speech Communication Student Research Symposium Spring 2008 This paper serves as
More informationHeidegger's What is Metaphysics?
Heidegger's What is Metaphysics? Heidegger's 1929 inaugural address at Freiburg University begins by posing the question 'what is metaphysics?' only to then immediately declare that it will 'forgo' a discussion
More informationPUTTING ART TO WORK: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
Sergiu SAVA Al.I. Cuza University of Iasi PUTTING ART TO WORK: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE Abstract The question of my study concerns the viability of Nietzsche s theory of art as it is configured in his last
More informationWas Heidegger a Relativist?
Was Heidegger a Relativist? Sacha Golob (King s College London) for The Emergence of Modern Relativism: The German Debates from the 1770s to the 1930s Edited by Katherina Kinzel, Martin Kusch, Johannes
More informationIt doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition:
The Preface(s) to the Critique of Pure Reason It doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition: Human reason
More informationUnderstanding How we Come to Experience Purposive. Behavior. Jacob Roundtree. Colby College Mayflower Hill, Waterville, ME USA
Understanding How we Come to Experience Purposive Behavior Jacob Roundtree Colby College 6984 Mayflower Hill, Waterville, ME 04901 USA 1-347-241-4272 Ludwig von Mises, one of the Great 20 th Century economists,
More informationUniversity of North Carolina Department of Philosophy Voice: E Caldwell Hall, CB 3125 Fax:
MARKUS KOHL University of North Carolina Department of Philosophy Voice: +1 919 962 7291 207E Caldwell Hall, CB 3125 Fax: +1 919 843 3929 Chapel Hill, NC 27599 E-Mail: mkohl17@email.unc.edu RESEARCH INTERESTS
More informationHEIDEGGER S RECOVERY OF THE BEING-QUESTION IN LIGHT OF HIS INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION OF HUSSERL S TRANSCENDENTAL REDUCTION
HEIDEGGER S RECOVERY OF THE BEING-QUESTION IN LIGHT OF HIS INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION OF HUSSERL S TRANSCENDENTAL REDUCTION CYRIL MCDONNELL, DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Martin Heidegger is generally regarded
More informationThe Non-spatiality of Things in Themselves for Kant*
The Non-spatiality of Things in Themselves for Kant* HENRY E. ALLISON I. IN THE Transcendental Aesthetic Kant argued from the a priori nature of our representation of space (and time) to its empirical
More informationModern Philosophy II
Modern Philosophy II 2016-17 Michaelmas: Kant Reading List and Essay Titles Lectures & tutorials: Dr. Andrew Cooper Module aims To introduce students to Kant s Critique of Pure Reason and to the philosophies
More informationRemarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays
Bernays Project: Text No. 26 Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays (Bemerkungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik) Translation by: Dirk Schlimm Comments: With corrections by Charles
More informationPART ONE: HANS-GEORG GADAMER AND THE DECLINE OF TRADITION
PART ONE: HANS-GEORG GADAMER AND THE DECLINE OF TRADITION 5 6 INTRODUCTION TO PART ONE In his Wahrheit und Methode, Hans-Georg Gadamer traces the development of two concepts or expressions of a spirit
More informationTwo Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, davidhakim266@gmail.com
More informationTranscendental Reinterpretation of Heidegger s Argument on Living Things
The 3rd BESETO Conference of Philosophy Session 2 Transcendental Reinterpretation of Heidegger s Argument on Living Things KUSHITA Jun-ichi The University of Tokyo Abstract Heidegger s lecture course The
More informationIn Search of Lost Time: Kant and Heidegger
1 In Search of Lost Time: Kant and Heidegger Where should a history of the phenomenology of temporality begin? Strictly speaking, phenomenology in the distinctive sense that it has today starts with Edmund
More informationA Reply to Serena Feloj on The Powers of Pure Reason
A Reply to Serena Feloj on The Powers of Pure Reason Alfredo Ferrarin 1 University of Pisa I wish to thank Serena Feloj for her generous discussion of my book. I will try to answer her questions by beginning
More informationPH 329: Seminar in Kant Fall 2010 L.M. Jorgensen
PH 329: Seminar in Kant Fall 2010 L.M. Jorgensen Immanuel Kant (1724 1804) was one of the most influential philosophers of the modern period. This seminar will begin with a close study Kant s Critique
More informationAccessing the Moral Law through Feeling
Kantian Review, 20, 2,301 311 KantianReview, 2015 doi:10.1017/s1369415415000060 Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling owen ware Simon Fraser University Email: owenjware@gmail.com Abstract In this article
More information2006 by Marcus Willaschek
Kant on the Necessity of Metaphysics 1 Marcus Willaschek, Frankfurt / M. (To appear in: Proceedings of the 10. International Kant-Congress, Berlin: de Gruyter 2006) Human reason has this peculiar fate
More informationHeidegger and Nietzsche
Heidegger and Nietzsche Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy Series Editor: James Fieser, University of Tennessee at Martin, USA Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy is a major monograph
More information1/10. The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
More informationHeidegger, Translation, and the Task of Thinking
Heidegger, Translation, and the Task of Thinking CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHENOMENOLOGY IN COOPERATION WITH THE CENTER FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY Volume 65 Series Editors: Nicolas de Warren, Wellesley
More informationLeibniz on Justice as a Common Concept: A Rejoinder to Patrick Riley. Andreas Blank, Tel Aviv University. 1. Introduction
Leibniz on Justice as a Common Concept: A Rejoinder to Patrick Riley Andreas Blank, Tel Aviv University 1. Introduction I n his tercentenary article on the Méditation sur la notion commune de la justice,
More informationAn Introduction to Husserl's Marginal Remarks in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics
An Introduction to Husserl's Marginal Remarks in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics by Richard E. Palmer 1 Husserl's marginal remarks in Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik clearly do not reflect the
More information