The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market: Online Appendices
|
|
- Ashlie Fletcher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market: Online Appendices Online Appendix OA. Political Identity of Viewers Several times in the paper we treat as the left- most leaning TV station. Posner (2005) explains the process in which became liberally - biased: The current tendency to political polarization in news reporting is thus a consequence of changes not in underlying political opinions but in costs, specifically in the falling costs of new entrants. The rise of conservative Fox News Channel caused to shift to the left. was going to lose many of its conservative viewers to Fox anyway, so it made sense to increase its appeal to its remaining viewers by catering more assiduously to their political preferences. The data from the Pew s biennial media consumption surveys from shows a process very similar to the one described by Posner, at least in terms of the mean selfidentified liberal-conservative position 1 of and Fox viewers. As shown in figure OA.1, as late as 1998 the mean position of viewers was close to the mean position of Fox viewers and the mean position of National Broadcast news viewers. At later years, as Fox news attracted more conservative viewers, s audience became more liberal. 1 The liberal-conservative scale in the Pew data takes the following values: 1= Extremely liberal, 2=Liberal, 3=Moderate, 4=Conservative, 5=Extremely conservative 1
2 Unweighted Mean Lib/Con National Survey year Weighted Mean Lib/Con National Survey Year Figure OA.1: Mean self-identified liberal-conservative position of viewers of different TV news sources (on a 5 point scale) in different survey years. 2
3 Online Appendix OB. KN and Pew Survey Methodology We use two main sources of data in this work: surveys conducted by Knowledge Networks, and as corroborating data we use the Pew biennial media consumption survey. We use this appendix to discuss the relevant survey methodological issues of both surveys, and explain the different methods of correcting for different sampling problems. 1. Knowledge Networks Public Affairs Profiles The main data source we use is a collection of public affairs surveys collected by Knowledge Networks (KN), a survey research company that uses its nationally representative online KnowledgePanel SM of United States residents. The national sample for recruiting KnowledgePanel SM is constructed using random-digit dial (RDD) methodology. The RDD sample frame is updated quarterly to be most inclusive of all residential landline telephone numbers. All telephone numbers have a known probability of selection. For purposes of refreshing KnowledgePanel SM, on-going sampling (without replacement) and on-going recruitment is conducted. The members of Knowledge Networks panel are required to fill out one survey a week. The surveys are filled online; respondents who own a computer get their internet connection paid by Knowledge Networks, and respondents who do not have a personal computer at home receive a Microsoft Web-TV, set- top appliance who enables them to fill out surveys online and to have an account. The company provides survey services for both commercial and academic purposes, and administers clients surveys to sub-samples of their panel, when each sub sample is constructed to be nationally representative. When there are not enough clients surveys to administer to all panel 3
4 members, they are asked to fill surveys that were constructed internally (by Knowledge Network), in order to keep panel members active and engaged (respondents do not know whether the survey they fill is an internal one or a client s survey). The public affairs survey used in our research was conducted as such an internal filler survey, part of Knowledge Networks efforts to maintain panel members engagement. This sampling scheme, which for lack of a better name we call left over sampling, makes it so that populations that are under (over) represented in Knowledge Networks panel will be even more under (over) represented in the left over population. This under (over) representation is corrected by using post- sampling weights. Weighting: To correct for sample composition, Knowledge Networks uses rim weighting to match Census distributions of age, gender, ethnicity, income and education. Response Rates: The surveys were conducted over a period of 7 years, using an on- going rotating panel, which makes it difficult to categorize the types of non- response in the traditional way (currently, there is no standard to compute response rates for online or on- going panels, nor has AAPOR issued a document to do so). The main issue is categorizing those who have declined to join the panel, or have dropped from the panel; for any specific survey, we may want to categorize them as non- contacts instead of nonresponse. Scholars using online panels typically report cumulative response rate (Couper, 2007; Huggins & Eyerman, 2001; Schlengen et al., 2002; Schonlau, Van Soest, Kapteyn, & Couper, 2006; Tourangeau, 2003), which is a product of recruitment rate (RR), profile rate (PR) and completion rate (CR). These rates pertain to three stages that take place from recruitment of online panel members to survey completion. RR, which signifies the 4
5 people who indicate that they are willing to participate in the panel when they are first contacted by RRD, was 38% for the KN panel. PR, which indicates people who respond to the initial socio-demographic survey out of all who agreed to become panel members in the initial phone interview, was 61%. Those who complete the survey become active panel members, and they start getting invitations to complete various surveys. Survey CR is the percentage of those who completed a particular survey out of all people invited to do so. CR for the public affairs profiles we use was between 70% and 75% over the 7 year period in which they were conducted, yielding cumulative response rates of 16% - 17%. 2. Pew Biennial Media Consumption Surveys Detailed information about the sampling scheme, response rates, and the questionnaires themselves can all be found on the Pew Research Center s webpage at We report here the bare essentials, for an easy comparison to the Knowledge Networks data. The Pew survey was conducted over the phone. The sample was drawn using standard list-assisted random digit dialing (RDD) methodology. As many as 10 attempts were made to contact every sampled telephone number. Calls were staggered over times of day and days of the week to maximize the chance of making contact with potential respondents. See Table A.1 for a comparison of the demographics of the sample population in the two data sets we use, and the comparable statistics from the Census Bureau s 2005 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC). Weighting: Pew weights are calculated to balance the interviewed sample of all adults by form to match national parameters for sex, age, education, race, Hispanic 5
6 origin, region (U.S. Census definitions), and population density. The White, non- Hispanic subgroup was also balanced on age, education and region. These parameters came from a special analysis of the Census Bureau s 2005 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) that included all households in the continental United States that had a telephone. Weighting was accomplished using Sample Balancing, a special iterative sample weighting program that simultaneously balances the distributions of all variables using a statistical technique called the Deming Algorithm. Response Rates: the Contact Rate (proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made) was 80%-81% (based on the 2004 and 2006 surveys, respectively). The Cooperation Rate (proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at least initially obtained, versus those refused) was 45% - 39%. The Completion Rate (proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were completed) was 94% - 92%. Overall, the cumulative response rates for the 2004 survey was 34%, and for the 2006 survey 29%. 3. Comparing Sample Compositions, Correcting for Sample Selection Table OB.1 compares the population reference parameters (taken from the Census Bureau s 2005 ASEC) to weighted and unweighted sample means of both the Knowledge Networks data and the Pew data (using the 2006 survey population). As is apparent from the table, both sample populations (KN and Pew) are older, more educated and not as ethnically diverse (with smaller representation for minorities) as the Census Bureau s ASEC. One way to correct for sample selection is to use post- sampling weights, and as Table OB.1 shows, using the weight gets the calculated means closer to the reference 6
7 population values. These sampling weights are the ones used in the body of the text, when we calculate weighted means of the different dependent variables. - Table OB.1 about here - An alternative way to correct for the sample selection problem is to run OLS regressions of the dependent variables, using the different demographic variables as regressors. The relationships uncovered in these regressions (the coefficients on the variables of interest) are then unbiased, as long as the selection into the sample is made on the independent variables (the various demographic controls we use), and not on the dependent variable (political views, strength of party id, or the level of interest in issues not covered by mainstream media). The interpretation of the coefficients then is slightly different then weighted population means; the coefficients in the OLS regressions are then the mean difference between two hypothetical respondents who are similar in their demographics, (or the residual difference between them, taking into account all the differences that can be attributed to observable demographic differences). 7
8 Table OB.1. Comparison of Sample Populations Demographics to The Census Bureau s 2005 ASEC sample Census KN Pew Reference Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted Gender Male 48.1% 45.0% 48.2% 43.9% 47.9% Female 51.9% 55.0% 51.8% 56.1% 52.1% Age % 3.4% 5.2% 8.3% 12.5% % 15.9% 20.0% 12.6% 16.6% % 22.7% 19.0% 18.0% 19.3% % 25.4% 21.7% 20.6% 19.3% % 18.5% 17.2% 17.2% 13.7% % 13.9% 16.9% 20.8% 16.3% Education Less than HS Graduate 15.0% 6.1% 12.9% 7.5% 12.0% HS Graduate 36.1% 21.5% 31.7% 32.6% 35.8% Some College 23.1% 38.4% 27.3% 25.2% 24.2% College Graduate 25.8% 34.0% 28.0% 33.7% 27.3% Race/Ethnicity White/not Hispanic 71.2% 78.9% 73.6% 77.5% 72.5% Black/not Hispanic 10.9% 8.5% 9.5% 10.4% 10.8% Hispanic 12.1% 4.8% 6.6% 5.5% 9.4% Other/not Hispanic 5.8% 7.8% 10.3% 5.2% 5.9% 8
9 Online Appendix OC. Full OLS Regression Results Table OC.1. - OC.3 in this appendix include the full results of the OLS regressions that were shown in the body of the text, in Appendix A. Table OC.1. includes the full OLS regressions using the Knowledge Networks data, which correspond to lines 1 and 2 of the third column in tables A1 and A2 in the body of the text. Table OC.2. includes the full OLS regression using the Pew data, which corresponds to line 3 of the third column in tables A1 and A2 in the body of the text. Table OC.3 presents the results for hypothesis H1, which corresponds to the results in Table A3. In interpreting the results, recall that the hypotheses tested in the paper are all about correlations; we used regression to potentially control for selection into the sample (particularly in the Knowledge Networks data) that might affect the results. Table OC.1. The Ideological/Partisan Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Using Knowledge Networks Data Among Fox News Viewers Among News Viewers Party ID Lib-Con Position Party ID Lib-Con Position Internet 0.60*** 0.76*** -0.42*** -0.72*** Std. Err Female -0.22*** -0.26*** -0.24*** -0.21*** Std. Err Married 0.20*** 0.29*** 0.12*** 0.19*** Std. Err White 0.45*** 0.39*** 0.25*** 0.22*** Std. Err Black -0.99*** -0.25*** -0.79*** Std. Err Hispanic ** -0.18** Std. Err Religious 0.38*** 0.55*** 0.26*** 0.45*** Std. Err Age -0.02*** *** 0.01 Std. Err
10 Age Squared *** Std. Err Highest Degree Earned: High School 0.18*** 0.19*** Std. Err College 0.25*** 0.23*** Std. Err Advanced Degree *** -0.35*** Std. Err Household Income: $5,000 to $7, *** ** Std. Err $7,500 to $9, ** Std. Err $10,000 to $12, *** ** Std. Err $12,500 to $14, Std. Err $15,000 to $19, Std. Err $20,000 to $24, Std. Err $25,000 to $29, Std. Err $30,000 to $34, ** Std. Err $35,000 to $39, Std. Err $40,000 to $49, Std. Err $50,000 to $59, Std. Err $60,000 to $74, Std. Err $75,000 to $84, ** Std. Err $85,000 to $99, *
11 Std. Err $100,000 to $124, *** 0.18** Std. Err $125,000 to $149, ** Std. Err $150,000 to $174, *** 0.22** Std. Err $175,000 or more -0.42*** 0.20** Std. Err Year * Std. Err Year ** Std. Err Year ** Std. Err Year * -0.23*** 0.20** 0.13 Std. Err Year * Std. Err Year ** Std. Err Constant 3.09*** 3.54*** 3.18*** 3.35*** Std. Err R N 17, , (*) - significant at 10% level. (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. 11
12 Table OC.2. The Ideological Difference between Internet News Users and Non- Internet News Users Using Pew Data Among Fox News Viewers Among News Viewers Lib-Con Position Lib-Con Position Internet Std. Err Female -0.15* Std. Err Married 0.49*** 0.39*** Std. Err White Std. Err Black Std. Err Asian Std. Err Hispanic -0.44** Std. Err Religious 0.40*** 0.48*** Std. Err Age Std. Err Age Squared Std. Err Highest Degree Earned: Grades Std. Err High School Std. Err Vocational Std. Err Some College Std. Err College Graduate Std. Err Advanced Degree Std. Err
13 Household Income: $10,000 to $20, Std. Err $20,000 to $30, Std. Err $30,000 to $40, Std. Err $40,000 to $50, Std. Err $50,000 to $75, Std. Err $75,000 to $100, Std. Err $100,000 or more Std. Err Year ** Std. Err Year * Std. Err Constant 1.92*** 1.98*** Std. Err R N (*) - significant at 10% level. (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. 13
14 Table OC.3. The Likelihood of choosing Other Issue as the most important Issue for Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Using Knowledge Networks Data Likelihood of Choosing Other Issue Internet 0.014*** Std. Err Female -0.02*** Std. Err Married ** Std. Err White -0.02** Std. Err Black -0.03*** Std. Err Hispanic Std. Err Religious -0.02*** Std. Err Age Std. Err Age Squared Std. Err Highest Degree Earned: High School 0.13** Std. Err College 0.02*** Std. Err Advanced Degree 0.03*** Std. Err Household Income: $5,000 to $7, Std. Err $7,500 to $9, Std. Err $10,000 to $12, Std. Err $12,500 to $14,
15 Std. Err $15,000 to $19, Std. Err $20,000 to $24, Std. Err $25,000 to $29, Std. Err $30,000 to $34,999 Std. Err * 0.01 $35,000 to $39,999 Std. Err $40,000 to $49,999 Std. Err $50,000 to $59,999 Std. Err * 0.01 $60,000 to $74,999 Std. Err. 0.02** 0.01 $75,000 to $84,999 Std. Err ** 0.01 $85,000 to $99,999 Std. Err * 0.01 $100,000 to $124,999 Std. Err ** 0.01 $125,000 to $149,999 Std. Err $150,000 to $174,999 Std. Err $175,000 or more Std. Err Year 2005 Std. Err *** 15
16 0.003 Constant Std. Err. 0.09*** 0.02 R 2 N ,477 (*) - significant at 10% level. (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. 16
17 Online Appendix OD. Testing the Hypotheses using Subgroups for Comparison follows: Our hypotheses about the ideological position of Internet news users are given as H1: Of those who watch the News Channel, those who also get news from the Internet will be more conservative than all other News viewers. H2: Of those who watch news, those who also get news from the Internet will be more liberal than all other news viewers. In the body of the paper we test these hypotheses by comparing those who use the Internet and the extreme television new source to all others who are using the same extreme television news source. In other words, our comparison group in the tests, the non-internet news users, included those who are just using the extreme television news source, those who are using the extreme television news source and watching national network news broadcasts, and those who are using both extreme television news sources. A stronger version of these hypotheses is that the Internet news users should be more extreme when looking at each of these three sub-groups separately. The results of performing the analysis for each of the three different sub-groups separately are presented in Tables D.1 and D.2. The estimated difference is always in the predicted direction. Further, the results using the Knowledge Networks data are almost always statistically significant at conventional levels and the results based on using the Pew data often are despite the very small sample size being used in the tests. These findings provide further support to the claim that those using the Internet to supplement their news consumption from or by searching for news on the Internet are more ideological extreme and identify more strongly with the their respective party than their counterparts who do not. 17
18 Table D.1. The Ideological/Partisan Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Among News Viewers: Divided by Subgroups DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National + +National + Difference 0.39*** 0.94*** 1.00*** 0.29*** 0.90*** 1.00*** 0.14*** 0.63*** 0.64*** Std. Error N DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National + +National + Difference 0.42*** 0.87*** 1.21*** 0.31*** 0.91*** 1.14*** 0.18*** 0.73*** 0.75*** Std. Error N DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Pew data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National + +National + Difference 0.31** * 0.25** 0.26** 0.38** ** Std. Error N (*) - significant at 10% level. (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. See Appendix B for exact definitions of each of the variables and their coding schemes. Control variables included in the OLS regression include dummies for marital status, race / ethnic groups, levels of education, levels of religious participation, Income levels and survey years. 18
19 Table D.2. The Ideological/Partisan Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Among News Viewers: Divided by Subgroups DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National + +National + Difference -0.24* *** -0.28** -0.16* -0.65*** -0.24** -0.26*** -0.77*** Std. Error N DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National +FO X +National + Difference -0.75*** -0.63*** -0.74*** -0.74*** -0.68*** -1.06*** -0.56*** -0.57*** -1.10*** Std. Error N DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Pew data) Comparison Subgroup: +National + +National +FO X +National + Difference 0.31** * * -0.48*** Std. Error N (*) - significant at 10% level. (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. See Appendix B for exact definitions of each of the variables and their coding schemes. Control variables included in the OLS regression include dummies for marital status, race / ethnic groups, levels of education, levels of religious participation, Income levels and survey year. 19
20 Online Appendix OE. Testing the Hypotheses when the sample is broken down by level of Political Interest We also checked to see whether the results varied by the respondent s level of political interest. Our expectation is that since the politically interested are more likely to be using Internet to look at political content, the magnitude of the estimated effects to be larger among the more politically interested. For the estimation we divided the sample into those with low and high levels of political interest. We reran the three main analyses, broken down by the level of the respondent s political interest and present these results in tables E1-E3. In all cases, the magnitude of the effect is larger among the respondents with high levels of political interest. For the less politically interested, the results are less strong than originally estimated and often insignificant, although always in the right direction. 20
21 Table E.1. The Ideological/Partisan Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Among News Viewers: Divided by Political Interest (A) Respondents with High Levels of Political Interest DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Difference 0.972** 0.927** 0.647** Std. Error (0.047) (0.030) (0.029) N 14,047 14,047 14,047 DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Difference 0.994** 1.007** 0.828** Std. Error (0.052) (0.032) (0.031) N 13,812 13,812 13,812 (B) Respondents with Low Levels of Political Interest DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Difference 0.386** 0.297** Std. Error (0.105) (0.079) N 3,420 3,420 3,420 DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Difference * Std. Error (0.090) N 3,328 3,328 3,328 (*) significant at 10% level (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. The sample is limited to Fox News viewers; the point estimates indicate the difference between the weighted means of Internet and non-internet news users in terms of their party identification and liberal-conservative position. See Appendix B for the exact definitions of each of the variables and their coding schemes. 21
22 Table E.2. The Ideological/Partisan Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users Among News Viewers: Divided by Political Interest (A) Respondents with High Levels of Political Interest DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Difference * ** ** Std. Error (0.129) (0.083) (0.082) N 6,463 6,463 6,463 DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Difference ** -0.82** ** Std. Error (0.150) (0.102) (0.102) N 6,073 6,073 6,073 (B) Respondents with Low Levels of Political Interest DV = Party Identification (Knowledge Networks data) Difference Std. Error N 1,233 1,233 1,233 DV = Liberal-Conservative Position (Knowledge Networks data) Difference Std. Error N 1,125 1,125 1,125 (*) significant at 10% level (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. The sample is limited to news viewers; the point estimates indicate the difference between the weighted means of Internet news and non-internet news users in terms of their party identification and their liberal-conservative position. See Appendix B for the exact definitions of each of the variables and their coding schemes. 22
23 Table E.3. Difference between Internet News Users and Non-Internet News Users in Terms of the Diversity of Issues Considered Important: Divided by Political Interest (A) Respondents with High Levels of Political Interest DV = Likelihood of Identifying Other as Most Important Issue (Knowledge Networks data) Difference 0.017** 0.017** 0.012** Std. Error (0.003) (0.003) (0.003) N 25,974 25,974 25,974 DV = Likelihood of Identifying Less Salient Issue as Most Important Issue (Knowledge Networks data) Difference 0.031** 0.031** 0.015** Std. Error (0.004) (0.004) (0.005) N 25,974 25,974 25,974 (B) Respondents with Low Levels of Political Interest DV = Likelihood of Identifying Other as Most Important Issue (Knowledge Networks data) Difference Std. Error N 8,415 8,415 8,415 DV = Likelihood of Identifying Less Salient Issue as Most Important Issue (Knowledge Networks data) Difference Std. Error N 8,415 8,415 8,415 (*) significant at 10% level (**) significant at 5% level (***) significant at 1% level. The point estimates indicate the difference between the weighted means of Internet and non- Internet news users for the given dependent variables. See Appendix B for the exact definitions of each of the variables and their coding schemes. 23
RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, How Americans Feel About Religious Groups
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE JULY 16, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Greg Smith, Associate Director, Research Besheer
More informationEvangelicals, the Gospel, and Jewish People
Evangelicals, the Gospel, and Jewish People Representative Survey of 2,002 Americans With Evangelical Beliefs Sponsored by Chosen People Ministries and Author, Joel C Rosenberg 2 Methodology LifeWay Research
More informationDATA TABLES Global Warming, God, and the End Times by Demographic and Social Group
DATA TABLES Global Warming, God, and the End Times by Demographic and Social Group God controls the climate, therefore humans can t be causing global warming Proportion of total sample who say "Yes, definitely"
More informationChurchgoers Views Sabbath Rest. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views Sabbath Rest Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled
More informationChurchgoers Views - Prosperity. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views - Prosperity Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled
More informationChurchgoers Views - Billy Graham. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views - Billy Graham Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled
More informationChurchgoers Views Strength of Ties to Church. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views Strength of Ties to Church Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the
More informationAmerican Views on Sin. Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans
American Views on Sin Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study Sept. 27 Oct. 1, 2016. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel, a
More informationAmerican Views on Honor and Shame. Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans
American Views on Honor and Shame Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study Sept. 27 Oct. 1, 2016. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel,
More informationAmerican Views on Assisted Suicide. Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans
American Views on Assisted Suicide Representative Survey of 1,000 Americans 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study Sept. 27 Oct. 1, 2016. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel,
More informationAmerican Views on Christmas. Representative Survey of American
American Views on Christmas Representative Survey of American 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study September 21-23, 2018. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel, a
More informationU.S. Catholics Express Favorable View of Pope Francis
0 April 3, 2013 First Reactions More Positive than for Pope Benedict U.S. Catholics Express Favorable View of Pope Francis FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Cooperman Associate Director, Pew Research
More informationChurchgoers Views Alcohol. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views Alcohol Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel,
More informationPOLITICS AND MEDIA SHAPE VIEWS OF WAR ON CHRISTMAS
For immediate release, Monday, December 23, 2013 Contact: Dan Cassino 973.896.7072 (cell) dcassino@fdu.edu 7 pp. @dancassino POLITICS AND MEDIA SHAPE VIEWS OF WAR ON CHRISTMAS Over the past few years,
More informationChurchgoers Views - Tithing. Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers
Churchgoers Views - Tithing Representative Survey of 1,010 American Churchgoers 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted the study August 22 30, 2017. The survey was conducted using the web-enabled KnowledgePanel,
More informationNUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 30, 2013
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 30, 2013 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Cary Funk, Senior Researcher Erin O Connell,
More informationThis report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next
2 This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next section describes data collection and fielding. The final two sections address weighting procedures
More informationChurchgoer Views on Ethnic Diversity of Church. Survey of 994 American Christian church attendees
Churchgoer Views on Ethnic Diversity of Church Survey of 994 American Christian church attendees 2 Methodology The phone survey of 2,000 Americans was conducted September 19 - October 5, 2014 The calling
More informationCONSPIRACY THEORIES PROSPER: 25% OF AMERICANS ARE TRUTHERS
For immediate release Thursday, January 17, 2013 9 pp. Contact: Dan Cassino 973-896-7072 dcassino@fdu.edu @dancassino Krista Jenkins 908.328.8967 kjenkins@fdu.edu CONSPIRACY THEORIES PROSPER: 25% OF AMERICANS
More informationU.S. Catholics Happy with Selection of Pope Francis
0 March 18, 2013 Most Say Addressing Sex Abuse Scandal Should Be a Top Priority for the New Pope U.S. Catholics Happy with Selection of Pope Francis FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Cooperman Associate
More informationEvangelical Attitudes Toward Israel
Evangelical Attitudes Toward Israel Representative Survey of 2,002 Americans With Evangelical Beliefs Sponsored by Chosen People Ministries and Author, Joel C Rosenberg 2 Methodology LifeWay Research conducted
More informationU.S. Catholics See Sex Abuse as the Church s Most Important Problem, Charity as Its Most Important Contribution
0 March 6, 2013 Views of the Catholic Church Today U.S. Catholics See Sex Abuse as the Church s Most Important Problem, Charity as Its Most Important Contribution FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan
More informationEvangelical Attitudes Toward Israel Research Study
Evangelical Attitudes Toward Israel Research Study Evangelical Attitudes Towards Israel and the Peace Process Sponsored By Chosen People Ministries and Author Joel C. Rosenberg Table of Contents Page Executive
More informationState of the First Amendment 2009 Commissioned by the First Amendment Center
State of the First Amendment 2009 Commissioned by the First Amendment Center The First Amendment Center has commissioned this annual national survey of American attitudes about the First Amendment since
More informationMISCONCEPTIONS FUEL DEEP UNPOPULARITY OF COMMON CORE
For immediate release Thursday, February 19, 2015 Contact: Dan Cassino 973.896.7072 dcassino@fdu.edu @dancassino 13 pages MISCONCEPTIONS FUEL DEEP UNPOPULARITY OF COMMON CORE As millions of students across
More informationThe 2010 Jewish Population Study of Metropolitan Chicago METHODOLOGY REPORT
n Job #I1188 The 2010 Jewish Population Study of Metropolitan Chicago METHODOLOGY REPORT On behalf of the Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Ukeles Associates (UAI) contracted
More informationViews on Ethnicity and the Church. From Surveys of Protestant Pastors and Adult Americans
Views on Ethnicity and the Church From Surveys of Protestant Pastors and Adult Americans Protestant Pastors Views on Ethnicity and the Church Survey of 1,007 Protestant Pastors 3 Methodology The telephone
More informationNATIONAL: U.S. CATHOLICS LOOK FORWARD TO POPE S VISIT
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll CONTACTS: For commentary on poll results and the pope
More informationMore See Too Much Religious Talk by Politicians
March 21, 2012 Santorum Voters Disagree More See Too Much Religious Talk by Politicians FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut President, Pew Research Center Carroll Doherty, Michael Dimock Associate
More informationJEWISH EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: TRENDS AND VARIATIONS AMONG TODAY S JEWISH ADULTS
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: TRENDS AND VARIATIONS AMONG TODAY S JEWISH ADULTS Steven M. Cohen The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Senior Research Consultant, UJC United Jewish Communities Report Series
More informationAmerican Views on Religious Freedom. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans
American Views on Religious Freedom Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans 2 Methodology The phone survey of Americans was conducted September 19-28, 2014 The calling utilized Random Digit Dialing. 60% of completes
More informationNEWS AND RECORD / HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/29/2018
NEWS AND RECORD / HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/29/2018 ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/31/2015
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/31/2015 ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationThe Reform and Conservative Movements in Israel: A Profile and Attitudes
Tamar Hermann Chanan Cohen The Reform and Conservative Movements in Israel: A Profile and Attitudes What percentages of Jews in Israel define themselves as Reform or Conservative? What is their ethnic
More informationJanuary Parish Life Survey. Saint Paul Parish Macomb, Illinois
January 2018 Parish Life Survey Saint Paul Parish Macomb, Illinois Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Washington, DC Parish Life Survey Saint Paul Parish Macomb, Illinois
More informationThe Changing Population Profile of American Jews : New Findings
The Fifteenth World Congress of Jewish Studies Jerusalem, Israel August, 2009 The Changing Population Profile of American Jews 1990-2008: New Findings Barry A. Kosmin Research Professor, Public Policy
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 4/7/2017 (UPDATE)
ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 4/7/2017 (UPDATE) DETAILS Adults in North Carolina.
More informationAppendix B: Survey methodology
1 Appendix B: Survey methodology Muslim Americans constitute a population that is rare, dispersed and diverse. It includes many recent immigrants from multiple countries with different native languages
More informationBrandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies
Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Millennial Children of Intermarriage: Touchpoints and Trajectories of Jewish Engagement Technical Appendices Theodore Sasson
More informationFOR RELEASE APRIL 25, 2018
FOR RELEASE APRIL 25, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Gregory A. Smith, Associate Director of Research Jessica Pumphrey, Communications Associate 202.419.4372 RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center,
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/10/2017 (UPDATE)
ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/10/2017 (UPDATE) DETAILS Adults in North Carolina
More informationJury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial?
Jury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial? Prepared for: The American Bar Association July 2004 Table of Contents Page Background and Methodology 3 Executive Summary 4 Detailed Findings 7 Respondent
More informationWhat America Is Thinking Natural Gas Exports May 2014
What America Is Thinking Natural Gas Exports May 2014 Created for: American Petroleum Institute Presented by: Nielsen Interviewing: May 15 19, 2014 Respondents: 1,000 Registered Voters Method: Telephone
More informationOpinions about the Latin Mass have shifted over time A Majority of adult Catholics express no opinion on return of older liturgy
The Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate News release Contact: Mark Gray August 24, 2009 202-687-0885 mmg34@georgetown.edu Opinions about the Latin Mass have shifted over time A Majority of adult
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 11/29/2017 (UPDATE)
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 11/29/2017 (UPDATE) ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) Start and end dates of data collection
More informationAmerican Values Atlas 2016 January 6, 2016 January 10, 2017 N = 101,438
American Values Atlas 2016 January 6, 2016 January 10, 2017 N = 101,438 RELIG What is your present religion, if any? Are you Protestant, Roman Catholic, Mormon, Orthodox such as Greek or Russian Orthodox,
More informationReligious affiliation, religious milieu, and contraceptive use in Nigeria (extended abstract)
Victor Agadjanian Scott Yabiku Arizona State University Religious affiliation, religious milieu, and contraceptive use in Nigeria (extended abstract) Introduction Religion has played an increasing role
More informationResults of SurveyUSA News Poll # Page 1
Even in Solid-Blue California, With More Democrats Watching, Romney Is Clear Winner of 1st Presidential Debate: Immediately following tonight's presidential debate between Republican Mitt Romney and Democrat
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, Dec. 15, 2014, Most Say Religious Holiday Displays on Public Property Are OK
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DEC. 15, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Alan Cooperman, Director, Religion Research Greg Smith, Associate Director, Research Jessica
More informationAMERICAN SECULARISM CULTUR AL CONTOURS OF NONRELIGIOUS BELIEF SYSTEMS. Joseph O. Baker & Buster G. Smith
AMERICAN SECULARISM CULTUR AL CONTOURS OF NONRELIGIOUS BELIEF SYSTEMS Joseph O. Baker & Buster G. Smith American Secularism: Cultural Contours of Nonreligious Belief Systems Joseph O. Baker and Buster
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, Aug. 8, 2016, Many Americans Hear Politics From the Pulpit
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUG. 8, FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Gregory A. Smith, Associate Director of Research Jessica Hamar
More informationReligion Poll. 03/11/2014 Prepared on behalf of The Huffington Post
03/11/2014 Prepared on behalf of The Huffington Post Religion Poll Methodology Fieldwork Dates 31 st Oct 1st September 2014 Data Collection Method The survey was conducted via online panel. Invitations
More informationAmerican Views on Islam. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans
American Views on Islam Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans 2 Methodology The phone survey of Americans was conducted September 14-28, 2015 The calling utilized Random Digit Dialing. 50% of completes were
More informationNote: Results are reported by total population sampled; and sub-samples. See final page for details.
The 11th Biannual Youth Survey on Politics and Public Service Field Dates: October 4 October 16, 2006 Master Questionnaire; N=2,546 18-24 Year Olds Margin of Error: ± 1.9% Note: Results are reported by
More informationThe American Religious Landscape and the 2004 Presidential Vote: Increased Polarization
The American Religious Landscape and the 2004 Presidential Vote: Increased Polarization John C. Green, Corwin E. Smidt, James L. Guth, and Lyman A. Kellstedt The American religious landscape was strongly
More informationFACTS About Non-Seminary-Trained Pastors Marjorie H. Royle, Ph.D. Clay Pots Research April, 2011
FACTS About Non-Seminary-Trained Pastors Marjorie H. Royle, Ph.D. Clay Pots Research April, 2011 This report is one of a series summarizing the findings of two major interdenominational and interfaith
More informationCatholic attitudes toward birth control in five countries: United States, Ireland, Colombia, Kenya, and the Philippines
Opinion Research Strategic Communication Catholic attitudes toward birth control in five countries: United States, Ireland, Colombia, Kenya, and the Philippines Conducted for Catholics for Choice June
More informationYouGov June 13-14, US Adults
1. Heard about Tweets In the months since the 2016 election, how much have you heard about on Twitter? Heard a lot 63% 68% 58% 57% 50% 65% 81% 65% 64% 54% 57% Heard a little 29% 26% 32% 35% 34% 29% 17%
More informationPastor Views on Tithing. Survey of Protestant Pastors
Pastor Views on Tithing Survey of Protestant Pastors 2 Methodology The phone survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors was conducted August 30 September 18, 2017 The calling list was a stratified random sample,
More informationSurvey Report New Hope Church: Attitudes and Opinions of the People in the Pews
Survey Report New Hope Church: Attitudes and Opinions of the People in the Pews By Monte Sahlin May 2007 Introduction A survey of attenders at New Hope Church was conducted early in 2007 at the request
More informationApril Parish Life Survey. Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish Las Vegas, Nevada
April 2017 Parish Life Survey Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish Las Vegas, Nevada Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Washington, DC Parish Life Survey Saint Elizabeth Ann
More informationIs Religion A Force For Good In The World? Combined Population of 23 Major Nations Evenly Divided in Advance of Blair, Hitchens Debate.
Is Religion A Force For Good In The World? Combined Population of 23 Major Nations Evenly Divided in Advance of Blair, Hitchens Debate. 48% Believe Religion Provides Common Values, Ethical Foundations
More informationHIGHLIGHTS. Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students 2014
HIGHLIGHTS Demographic Survey of American Jewish College Students 2014 Ariela Keysar and Barry A. Kosmin Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut The national online Demographic Survey of American College
More informationU.S. Catholics Divided On Church s Direction Under New Pope
0 February 21, 2013 Reactions to the Papal Resignation U.S. Catholics Divided On Church s Direction Under New Pope FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Cooperman Associate Director, Pew Research Center
More informationAugust Parish Life Survey. Saint Benedict Parish Johnstown, Pennsylvania
August 2018 Parish Life Survey Saint Benedict Parish Johnstown, Pennsylvania Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Washington, DC Parish Life Survey Saint Benedict Parish
More informationUnion for Reform Judaism. URJ Youth Alumni Study: Final Report
Union for Reform Judaism URJ Youth Alumni Study: Final Report February 2018 Background and Research Questions For more than half a century, two frameworks have served the Union for Reform Judaism as incubators
More informationFactors related to students spiritual orientations
The Christian Life Survey 2014-2015 Administration at 22 Christian Colleges tucse.taylor.edu Factors related to students spiritual orientations Introduction The Christian Life Survey (CLS) uses a set of
More informationIn Our Own Words 2000 Research Study
The Death Penalty and Selected Factors from the In Our Own Words 2000 Research Study Prepared on July 25 th, 2001 DEATH PENALTY AND SELECTED FACTORS 2 WHAT BRINGS US TOGETHER: A PRESENTATION OF THE IOOW
More informationNEWS AND RECORD / HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/1/2017
ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection NEWS AND RECORD / HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 3/1/2017 Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) DETAILS Adults in North
More informationthe polling company, inc./womantrend Kellyanne Conway, President & CEO August 2015
the polling company, inc./womantrend Kellyanne Conway, President & CEO August 2015 2 Analysis of Findings: Nationwide Dual-Frame Survey of 1,000 Catholic Adults Nationwide dual-frame telephone survey (70%
More informationThe numbers of single adults practising Christian worship
The numbers of single adults practising Christian worship The results of a YouGov Survey of GB adults All figures are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 7,212 GB 16+ adults. Fieldwork was undertaken
More informationPastor Views on Technology. Survey of Protestant Pastors
Pastor Views on Technology Survey of Protestant Pastors 2 Methodology The phone survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors was conducted August 30 September 18, 2017 The calling list was a stratified random sample,
More informationThe Zeal of the Convert: Religious Characteristics of Americans who Switch Religions
The Zeal of the Convert: Religious Characteristics of Americans who Switch Religions By Allison Pond, Gregory Smith, Neha Sahgal and Scott F. Clement Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life Abstract: Religion
More informationProtestant pastor views of Islam
Protestant pastor views of Islam 2 Methodology LifeWay Research commissioned Zogby International to conduct a telephone survey of Protestant pastors. It was conducted March1-9, 2010. The calling list was
More informationMay Parish Life Survey. St. Mary of the Knobs Floyds Knobs, Indiana
May 2013 Parish Life Survey St. Mary of the Knobs Floyds Knobs, Indiana Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Washington, DC Parish Life Survey St. Mary of the Knobs Floyds
More informationThe 2007 Jewish Community Study of the Lehigh Valley. Main Report Volume I: Chapters 1-7
The 2007 Jewish Community Study of the Lehigh Valley Main Report Volume I: Chapters 1-7 Ira M. Sheskin, Ph.D. Director of the Jewish Demography Project of the Sue and Leonard Miller Center for Contemporary
More informationMiracles, Divine Healings, and Angels: Beliefs Among U.S. Adults 45+
Miracles, Divine Healings, and Angels: Beliefs Among U.S. Adults 45+ with Hispanic Oversample Report written by G. Oscar Anderson, Research Analyst Member Value Research Knowledge Management Survey conducted
More informationCongregational Survey Results 2016
Congregational Survey Results 2016 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Making Steady Progress Toward Our Mission Over the past four years, UUCA has undergone a significant period of transition with three different Senior
More informationChristian Media in Australia: Who Tunes In and Who Tunes It Out. Arnie Cole, Ed.D. & Pamela Caudill Ovwigho, Ph.D.
Christian Media in Australia: Who Tunes In and Who Tunes It Out Arnie Cole, Ed.D. & Pamela Caudill Ovwigho, Ph.D. April 2012 Page 1 of 17 Christian Media in Australia: Who Tunes In and Who Tunes It Out
More information1. With regard to school, are you currently enrolled at any of the following? Please select all that apply: Total: 4-Year College
Survey of Young Americans Attitudes toward Politics and Public Service 18 th Edition: September 24 October 4, 2010 N=2,004 18-29 Year Olds in English and Spanish (with Knowledge Networks) Margin of Error
More informationUsage of Islamic Banking and Financial Services by United States Muslims
The Third Annual Conference of Islamic Economics & Islamic Finance Venue: Chestnut Conference Center, Toronto University, Canada Usage of Islamic Banking and Financial Services by United States Muslims
More informationPastor Views on Sermons and the IRS
Pastor Views on Sermons and the IRS Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors Sponsored by Alliance Defending Freedom 2 Methodology The phone survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors was conducted August 30 September
More informationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE (UPDATE) 3/2/2016
ELEMENTS Population represented Sample size Mode of data collection Type of sample (probability/nonprobability) HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE (UPDATE) 3/2/2016 DETAILS Adults in North Carolina.
More informationuntil October 8, 2008 at 11:30 AM EDT CONTACT: Katie Paris or Kristin Williams, Faith in Public Life at
EMBARGOED until October 8, 2008 at 11:30 AM EDT CONTACT: Katie Paris or Kristin Williams, Faith in Public Life at 202.435. 0262 OCTOBER 8, 2008 Faith in Public Life: The Young and the Faithful Executive
More informationMuhlenberg College/Morning Call 2016 Pennsylvania Election Survey November Version
Muhlenberg College/Morning Call 2016 Pennsylvania Election Survey November Version Key Findings: 1. With Election Day only days away Hillary Clinton holds a 6-point lead in a head-to-head matchup with
More informationPastors Views on the Economy s Impact Survey of Protestant Pastors
Pastors Views on the Economy s Impact 2018 Survey of Protestant Pastors 2 Methodology The phone survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors was conducted August 29 September 11, 2018 The calling list was a stratified
More informationFactors related to students focus on God
The Christian Life Survey 2014-2015 Administration at 22 Christian Colleges tucse.taylor.edu Factors related to students focus on God Introduction Every year tens of thousands of students arrive at Christian
More informationAppendix 1. Towers Watson Report. UMC Call to Action Vital Congregations Research Project Findings Report for Steering Team
Appendix 1 1 Towers Watson Report UMC Call to Action Vital Congregations Research Project Findings Report for Steering Team CALL TO ACTION, page 45 of 248 UMC Call to Action: Vital Congregations Research
More informationNo Religion. Writing from the vantage. A profile of America s unchurched. By Ariela Keysar, Egon Mayer and Barry A. Kosmin
By Ariela Keysar, Egon Mayer and Barry A. Kosmin No Religion A profile of America s unchurched Writing from the vantage point of an anthropologist of religion, Diana Eck has observed that We the people
More informationESTIMATING THE JEWISH POPULATION OF
ESTIMATING THE JEWISH POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES: 2000-2010 OCTOBER 2011 STUDY AUTHORS ELIZABETH TIGHE, LEONARD SAXE & CHARLES KADUSHIN W/ ASSISTANCE FROM RAQUEL MAGIDIN DE KRAMER, BEGLI NURSAHEDOV,
More informationThe 2018 Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit Population Study: A Portrait of the Detroit Community
1 The 2018 Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit Population Study: A Portrait of the Detroit Community Jewish Education Congregational Schools Ira M. Sheskin, Ph.D. Director of the Jewish Demography
More informationSurvey of Church Members. Minnesota Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church 2006 Center for Creative Ministry
Survey of Church Members Minnesota Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church 2006 Center for Creative Ministry Source of Data o A random sample of 34 local churches was selected and telephone interviews
More informationUniversity System of Georgia Survey on Student Speech and Discussion
University System of Georgia Survey on Student Speech and Discussion May 2008 Conducted for the Board of Regents University System of Georgia by By James J. Bason, Ph.D. Director and Associate Research
More informationCatholics Divided Over Global Warming
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING YOUR WORLD ABOUT FOLLOW US Search Religion & Public Life MENU RESEARCH AREAS JUNE 16, 2015 Catholics Divided Over Global Warming Partisan Differences Mirror Those Among
More informationRECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, U.S. Catholics View Pope Francis as a Change for the Better
NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MARCH 6, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Greg Smith, Director of U.S. Religion Surveys
More informationCouncil on American-Islamic Relations RESEARCH CENTER AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS
CAIR Council on American-Islamic Relations RESEARCH CENTER AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION ABOUT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS 2006 453 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003-2604 Tel: 202-488-8787 Fax: 202-488-0833 Web:
More informationMen practising Christian worship
Men practising Christian worship The results of a YouGov Survey of GB adults All figures are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 7,212 GB 16+ adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 23rd - 26th September
More informationHuffPost: Seasons greetings December 4-6, US Adults
1. Celebrate Christmas Do you celebrate Christmas? Yes 85% 84% 87% 80% 82% 87% 91% 88% 84% 88% 63% No 9% 11% 8% 9% 8% 12% 8% 9% 11% 2% 21% Not sure 5% 5% 5% 11% 10% 0% 1% 3% 5% 10% 16% Totals 99% 100%
More informationPastor Plans for Super Bowl Sunday Activities. Survey of Protestant Pastors in Churches Typically Conducting Sunday Night Activities
Pastor Plans for Super Bowl Sunday Activities Survey of Protestant Pastors in Churches Typically Conducting Sunday Night Activities 2 Methodology The phone survey of Protestant pastors was conducted August
More informationUnchurched Report. Survey of 2,000 Unchurched Americans. For the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism, Wheaton College
Unchurched Report Survey of 2,000 Unchurched Americans For the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism, Wheaton College 2 Methodology A demographically balanced online panel was used for interviewing American
More information