Minutes of the Minnesott Beach Board of Adjustment September 14,2010
|
|
- Brice Cook
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Minutes of the Minnesott Beach Board of Adjustment A meeting of the Board of Adjustment, Town of Minnesott Beach, was held on Tuesday, September 14, 2010, at the Minnesott Beach Town Hall. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Josh Potter, Mr. Dave Stewart, Mr. Eber Warren and Mr. Larry Whorton. MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Tim Fowler OTHERS PRESENT: Richard Skreba, Addie Durham, Joe and Dale Clark, Janice Mills, Bruce Goodman, Jack Bobel, Mike Calderaro, Charlene Lamb - Town Clerk and Catherine Hurm - Town Manager. Chairman Potter called the Board of Adjustment to order. A quorum was confirmed. of Adjustment. Chairman Potter advised it takes four (4) votes to do business by the Board Chairman Potter then proceeded to offer clarifying statements for a quasi-judicial hearings noting that the rules have changed a little bit but quasi-judicial hearings, sometimes called evidentiary hearings, are more formal than legislative hearings. Legislative hearings are for dealing with the town ordinance and that sort of thing. This is more of a court/semi-court type situation. These hearings are more demanding on those who participate in them. Chairman Potter then read the following: The purpose of this hearing is to hear the Application for a Variance by Robert W. Carr, Jr. and Marjorie B. Carr from the decision of the Zoning Administrator concerning Article VIII, Section 8.2, (3b), of the Town of Minnesott Beach's Unified Development Ordinance as it applies to Section 2, Lot 1 Indian Bluffs, recorded in Map-book 10, page 43, otherwise known as 108 Indian Bluff Drive, Minnesott Beach, Parnlico County, N.C. Article VIII, Section 8.2 (3b) reads as follows: No accessory building shall be started until the principal use building is 80 percent completed. Exception: Concrete footings and slabs of accessory buildings may be poured simultaneously with the footing of principal building. That is the ordinance. Chairman Potter noted that the Carrs were not present but the Board had their application for a variance which Chairman Potter then read as follows: This is the Town of Minnesott Beach, State of North Carolina, Application for a variance, August 11,2010. To the Town of Minnesott Beach Board of Appeals/Board of Adjustment: We, Robert W. Carr, Jr. and Marjorie B. Carr, hereby petition the Board of Appeals for a variance from the literal provision of the Town of Minnesott Beach Zoning Ordinance because, under the interpretation given to me by the Zoning Administrator, I am prohibited from using the parcel of land described below to build a tool shed in a manner shown by the attached plot plan. Chairman Potter noted that there was an attached diagram of the lot and what they want to build. Chairman Potter continued to read: I request a variance from the following provisions of the ordinance, variance from UDO Article VIII, Section 82, 3b which states that no accessory building shall be started until the principal use building is 80 percent complete. So that the above mentioned property can be used in a manner indicated by the attached plot plan, or as more fully described herein: to build a tool shed to service a vegetable garden for the life of Robert W. Carr Jr. and Marjorie B. Carr. lof8
2 Facts relevant to the issuance of a variance: the Board of Appeals/Board of Adjustment does not have unlimited discretion in deciding whether to grant a variance. Under the state enabling act, the Board is required to reach three conclusions as a prerequisite to the issuance of a variance: first - that there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the ordinance, two - that the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit, and thirdly - that in granting ofthe variance the public safety and welfare have been assured and substantial justice has been done. In the spaces provided below, indicate the facts that you intend to show and the arguments that you intend to make to convince the Board that it can properly reach these three required conclusions. In a) first conclusion: There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the ordinance. Now the courts have developed three rules to determine whether in a particular situation "practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships" exist. State facts and arguments in support of each of the following: First rule is - If he, the owner, complies with the provisions of the ordinance, the property owner can secure no reasonable return from or make no reasonable us of, his property. (It is not sufficient that failure to grant the variance simply makes the property less valuable). Mr. Carr has written here: As a matter of practicality to support, this is the hardship, as a matter of practicality a grower or gardener rather, would prefer to have his tools, his garden tools and materials "on site" rather than down the road. That's to support conclusion one. To support conclusion two which reads: The hardship, this is the second rule, the hardship of which the applicant complains results from unique circumstances related to the applicant's land (hardships suffered by the applicant in common with his neighbors do not justify a variance. Also, unique personal or family hardships are irrelevant since a variance, if granted, runs with the land.) In support of that rule he has written: The workshop, can't hardly read his writing, the hardship is "the convenience" the tool shed would be for us if it were allowed to be built. Rule three in support of the hardship: The hardship is not the result of the applicant's own actions. In support of that he has written - We are not going to build a house on this property in order to meet the present requirements to build a tool shed. So those are the three rules and that's the first conclusion about hardships and difficulties. The second conclusion the board must meet, must affirm is: The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. (State facts and arguments to show that the variance requested represents the least possible deviation from the letter of the ordinance that will allow a reasonable use of the land and that the use of the property, if the variance is granted, will not substantially detract from the character of the neighborhood.) In support of that conclusion is written: We have no desire or plans to build a house on this site. We do not feel a small tool shed will detract from the land. See attached letter and he has written a cover letter here, I'll read that: Preamble to the request for a variance. To whom it may concern - My wife, Muff, and I are not strangers to Pamlico County or Minnesott Beach. Indeed we have been visiting this area continually since 1958, first as campers at Camp Sea Gull and Camp Seafarer and then later as counselors, and now Muff continues to volunteer for the Camp as a Camp Doctor for a couple of weeks each summer at Camp Seafarer. During our many summers at Camp we fell in love with the Neuse River and particularly Minnesott Beach. We knew at some point we wanted to have a home at Minnesott on the River. 20f8
3 September 14, 2010 About fifteen years ago we were fortunate to find THE PLACE of our dreams - 47 Indian Bluff Drive! It is not considered a vacation home by us, but more as a "second home". We travel from Raleigh to visit every weekend 52 weeks every year! As we grow toward retirement we hope to be able to spend even more time at our second home. For years we attempted to have a vegetable garden at 47 Indian Bluff Drive, but the shade in the front yard, and the wind and lack of space in the back yard prevented any success in this endeavor. Recently we purchased the lot at 108 Indian Bluff Dive specifically to make another attempt at a vegetable garden. This past spring and summer we had our first garden on this lot and we learned a lot! (You can't manage a vegetable garden from Raleigh, by attending to it only on weekendsl) The attached request is for a variance to have a small tool shed built in the back corner of our lot to house our tools and materials for convenience to service our garden. The tool shed (sketches attached) was designed by my father, Robert W. Carr, who is a registered architect in North Carolina. In other words the tool shed that we are proposing is not a store bought structure. We want the tool shed to enhance the property - not detract from it. With modesty aside I believe most will agree that what Muff and I have done to the property at 108 Indian Bluff Drive has made it even more attractive and we will continue to add plants and trees as we can afford. Again this tool shed that we are requesting permission to build will help us with this project. Thank you for your kind consideration of our request. With best personal regards. Robert W. "Judge" Carr, Jr. - Marjorie B. "Muff' Carr, MD Okay, so that's the interlude in there, see the attached letter, We do not plan to store boats on this property. This is all under the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. The third conclusion is: The granting of the variance secures the public safety and welfare and does substantial justice. State facts and arguments to show that, on balance if the variance is denied, the benefit to the public will be substantially outweighed by the harm suffered by the applicant. There is no comment to support that conclusion. I certify that all of the information presented by me in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. Robert W. Carr, Jr. 8/11/2010. That is the application for variance. Now the process for this hearing will be as follows: All persons wishing to address this Board on the matter before it must be sworn in by the Chairman or appointed member prior to any testimony being given. This include town officials and the applicant. No testimony or comments will be accepted from any individual who has not been sworn in and all such comments will be ruled out of order and stricken from the record. No one will be allowed to be sworn in after testimony begins. The Board will hear the statements of the Zoning Administrator or designee on this application. Following that, the Board will hear the statements of the applicant. No interruptions from the audience will be permitted during the taking of testimony. After both the Zoning Administrator or designee, and the applicant have presented their information, the Board will receive testimony from others. Each testifier must have been previously sworn in and will state their name for the record. We request that testimony be kept brief and limited to the issue before us. 30f8
4 After hearing all parties, the Board of Adjustment will render its opinion. In order for a variance to be granted, at least 4/5's, 4 out of 5 of the voting members must agree that the applicant has satisfied each of the conclusions necessary to grant a variance. If the applicant fails to satisfactory prove any of the necessary conclusions by a 4/5's vote, then the variance cannot be granted. So, I will now at this time ask those persons that have signed up here and anybody else who wishes to speak during this hearing to line up here at the table and we will swear you in to hear your testimony. If you will, place your left hand on the Bible. Raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you shall give to the Board of Adjustment in this hearing shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. Unanimous response of I do's. Okay, if you'll just, I think everybody signed, if anybody hadn't signed will you just sign there. Thank you very much. As it's been said already, the Board of Adjustment, we do not have unlimited discretion in deciding whether to grant a variance. Under the enabling act, the Board is required to reach these three conclusions again, (a) that there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the ordinance. Those rules the Board read, (1) ifhe complies with the provisions of the ordinance, the property owner can secure no reasonable return from, or make no reasonable use of his property. (2) The hardship results from the application of the ordinance. (3) The hardship is suffered by the applicant's property. (4) The hardship is not the result ofthe applicant's own actions. (5) The hardship results from unique circumstances related to the applicant's land. The second conclusion - that the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. And thirdly, that in granting of the variance the public safety and welfare have been assured and substantial justice has been done. So first of all we will hear from the Zoning Administrator's designee, our Town Manager, Cathy Hurm. She will present Jeff Bland's side. I have here Mr. Carr's application for a zoning permit, application number , in which he requested a storage shed for gardening tools, equipment and supplies. On 5/5/1 0, Jeff Bland denied the permit noting Article VIII, Section 8.2, 3b, which states that no accessory building shall be started until the principal use building is 80 percent complete. So it was denied on that point and Mr. Carr was so advised. Chairman Potter - Any questions of Ms. Hurm concerning the Zoning Administrator's findings. Now we will hear from the applicant. Is Mr. Carr in the office? Mrs. Carr? They are not in the office, so now we will hear from those - we will take the testimony he's got on his application. That's all we've got. Now we will hear from the roll - testimony of sworn witnesses. First of all we have Ms. Addie Durham. I am Addie Durham, I have very little to say other than the fact that I am completely against it and I think Joe Clark - I agree with what he has and I agree with every word of it. Chairman Potter - Okay, Thank you very much, Ms. Addie. Second signed here is Joe Clark. Joe Clark - Members of the Board of Adjustments, residential continuity in our town and community has been maintained for many years by the basic laws and compliance by our citizens and property owners. The quiet residential nature and quality of life has not been interfered with by none permitted uses of property which would be detrimental to the overall primary purpose of the neighborhoods. After driving through every street in Minnesott today that was 40f8
5 Board of Adjustment initially zoned single family residential, all vacant lots are mostly wooded and natural with no distractions such as accessory buildings, garages, green houses, play houses, storage buildings, workshops, miscellaneous material or equipment stored in the open. A primary reason such distractions which contribute to neighborhood degradation hasn't occurred in our community, is the Section 8-2 that all of you have had and heard read in front of you. That is the Unified Development Ordinance, even though that has a date within a year or two, it is a combination of the laws of the Town of Minnesott, back basically to its founding. In Section 8-2 of that ordinance, says no accessory building shall be started until the principal use building is 80 percent complete, the section you have heard already. For years this has insured the residential continuity by permitting, not permitting vacant lots to be used for utility type purposes. The lot owners justification on the application for variance you have heard categorically read by the senior member of the Board of Adjustments. Basically it says they want to build a tool shed for a vegetable garden for the owners life duration. The shed itself is one issue, the vegetable garden issue is another one that should eventually, after the results of the Board are known, be looked at to see if it's in compliance. They practically think that having materials on site is better than having them down the road and they want it for convenience - no other justification. Additionally, the primary reason, a primary reason that we have maintained continuity is that a principal building had to be built on a vacant lot before you could go to the accessory building or use that lot. Here is another key point. This is not just about Indian Bluff Drive. If the variance were granted it would set for the first time within Minnesott a legal precedence of allowing accessory buildings for uses before the structure is 80 percent complete. The result of this would mean that it directly compromises the primary residential zoning, to residential and accessory joint uses. All our districts would be compromised, potentially eliminating primary residential. Soon you will vote on the merits of the appeal. The State law and Minnesott law are specific as to what justification must exist before a variance can be granted. How our neighborhood, doesn't need a mixture of single residency and utility/hobby type lots. This would destroy the residential continuity which is vital to our street and town. No one questions the background of Mr. and Mrs. Carr, they have high credibility. We simply ask that you support the laws and keep our community on track for the best of all of our citizens and the property owners in Minnesott. Additionally, we request that you require the property in question to be in full compliance as are the owners of the entire street. Thank you. Chairman Potter - Thank you very much, Mr. Clark. Next we have Ms. Janice Mills. Yep, that would be me. I have a - Chairman Potter - state your name. Janice Mills. I have a question the Zoning Administrator type question or just in general I have one question and then I have my comment. Is, were the Carrs ever questioned or given exemption to buy this land and put a garden on it? Is that something they just did. They didn't have to go and get permission to do this or - Chairman Potter - We're hearing you. We're not responding to. Ms. Mills Okay, that's my first comment. My question is the validity of them even creating a garden on their own and my other comment, I am sorry that their particular property that they do own doesn't give them the option of putting a garden on their perfect property. Okay. Apparently it's not perfect because if it were it would allow a garden. Okay. So I have really deep concerns that they haven't shown the test of time of what it requires to maintain a garden upon an ongoing year in - year out basis, and that we still front a major risk in the deterioration of that land or that property that he's cleared and put umpteen thousands of dollars into if they physically cannot continue to maintain it. At this point they want the additional luxury of having a tool shed and I think these are great plans, etc. but in reality I don't know if, I would like to see them have permission because I think it would help them to take care of the land 50f8
6 that they've started to do this with but at the same time I totally agree with Joe because I think to me at this point it's a risky endeavor still on their part and I don't know how much further we should invest in this plan of theirs. Because this is purely their little ideal plan and really isn't continuous with the rest of the area as it has been explained. Chairman Potter- Thank you very much for your comments. Bruce Goodman. Thanks, I'm Bruce Goodman. I agree with everything he said - Joe said. I love Minnesott Beach. I love where I live and everything. I came here twenty years ago and I want to die here and be poured in the river but I think it comes down to what the law says. I mean this isn't - the Carrs are great people and the garden they put in and everything. I live about two blocks away from it. It's beautiful you know and I'd sort of rather have that there - that house you know - because it keeps the openness and everything. But as Joe stated the thing we have to worry about is when the next person comes around and wants to do it. Now, I have some lots, I have two rental properties and my house is there and I'm concerned that the things he says. The next person that comes in says well you did it for him, why can't you do it for me. So in a nutshell that's my comment. Chairman Potter - Thank you Mr. Goodman. Chairman Potter - Mr. Jack Bobel. My name is Jack Bobel, I'm on the Board of Directors for and I represent the members of the South Lake Property Association. We're sure that when/if the Carrs build this garden shed it will be an attractive building but that's not the issue. The issue is whether the variance request meets the criteria listed in the variance procedures of the zoning rules and all we ask is that the board votes with that in mind so we don't end up with a precedent that could effect the rest of the town. And on a personal note I'd like to tell you a little story that happened to me not too many years back. I was working in my yard and a fellow was looking at the property right across from me which butts the golf course there and he came over and he was asking me about the area and he says, well I'm looking for a piece of property, he says I'm going to put a shed on it and I'm going to store my boat and everything and I told him, I said, well the town doesn't allow that. Needless to say he didn't buy the lot so you can see what might happen. So, that's all I have to relate. Thank you. Chairman Potter - Thank you Mr.Bobel. Chairman Potter - Mike Calderaro. I'm Mike Calderaro. I'd like to just present a scenario to the board. Should they approve the variance, I own four lots - building lots. I could put four sheds around Minnesott, and as long as I comply with the setbacks and the height requirements and leave enough room to build a minimum square footage house, I could build a great big building. I could rent space to people and that's why I'm against it. It's just where ever you go. You look all around. There's a lot of empty lots. You start letting somebody build accessory buildings before they move in and, you know, build the main structure then I think you're going to have a problem. Chairman Potter - Thank you very much. Chairman Potter - This is the end of the hearing. No more speakers are scheduled to speak. So now we will proceed with the vote of the Board of Appeals. We will vote on three conclusions. To issue a variance there must be four votes in the affirmative on each of the three conclusions. First conclusion is: a) along with the five rules, I'm going to read a conclusion along with the five rules, and vote on it. There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the ordinance. This must be substantiated by 1) If he complies with the provisions of the ordinance, the property owner can secure no reasonable return from, or make no reasonable use of his property. 60f8
7 2) The hardship results from the application ofthe ordinance. 3) The hardship is suffered by the applicant's property. 4) The hardship is not the result of the applicant's own actions. 5) The hardship is peculiar to the applicant's property. The question is: did the applicant, in his presentation or his application, prove that there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the ordinance by providing, by proving the conditions that those five rules exists. We have a choice of, Yes - in favor of the application or No - opposed to the application. I need a motion. Mr. Whorton - I make a motion we vote no against the application, against granting the variance. Chairman Potter - Okay, so what you are saying is you've noted there are not practical difficulties or unnecesasry hardships in the way of carrying out the strict ordinance, the strict letter of the ordinance. Mr. Whorton - That's correct. Chairman Potter - Okay, any discussion on that? In my opinion, he can make reasonable use of the property, his grounds for the variance is simply convenience and that is not grounds for hardship. Secondly, the hardship results from his preferred use of the property, not the application of the ordinance. The ordinance can be carried out, there's nothing on the property that prevents him from carrying out the ordinance. Thirdly, the hardship is not suffered by his property only. The hardship comes from his desire, their desire, for convenience and preference and that is irrelevant as far as hardship is concerned. Four, the hardship does result from the owners' own actions. It is his desire for convenience that's caused the hardship. Fifthly, the hardship is not peculiar to the owners' property. There are other properties in the same district, they're all R-20 situations over there. There is nothing unique about that piece of property that would be a hardship. So, the motion is that we, to oppose, or that there are not practical difficulties in this hardship in a way we can't carry out the strict letter of the ordinance. Any other discussion. Okay, all in favor raise your right hand. ( It is noted that all members of the Board voted to oppose the application.) Okay. Conclusion B is - The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. Question - Did the applicant prove the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit? Mr. Whorton - I do not believe he did and I'd like to make a motion that we deny it on that ground. Chairman Potter - Okay, its moved that the variance is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. Correct? Mr. Whorton - That's correct. Chairman Potter - Any more discussion, any discussion on reason to deny it then. The use desired is not in keeping with other properties in the neighborhood. Other properties are residential or vacant. Okay, any other discussion. The motion is it is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and preserves its spirit. All in favor then raise your right hand. 70f8
8 (It is noted that all members of the Board voted to oppose the application.) Okay, oppose the application. The third conclusion is: in granting of the variance the public safety and welfare have been assured and substantial justice has been done. Question - Did the applicant prove that in granting of the variance the public safety and welfare have been assured and substantial justice has been done? Mr. Whorton - I do not believe that he has proven that. I don't believe public safety comes into a garden tool shed but I don't think we should grant it. I make a motion that we deny it also. Chairman Potter - Okay, the motion is that in granting the ordinance the public safety had not been assured and substantial justice had not been done. Any discussion on that? Substantial justice would not be done because others in the neighborhood have adhered to the ordinance. Variance would change the essential character of the neighborhood which is a residential neighborhood. Any other comments? The motion is it has not been satisfied. All in favor raise your right hand. ( It is noted that all members of the Board voted to oppose the application.) Okay. So with all three conclusions, there is a denial of the application. So it goes without saying, the final conclusion for consideration is no and we need a motion to that effect - move the application for variance be denied. Mr. Whorton - I make a motion to deny the variance application. Chairman Potter - Okay, any discussion? All in favor raise your right hand. ( It is noted that all members of the Board voted to deny the application.) The variance has been denied. Mr. Carr, ifhe listens to this tape, may appeal from this Board of Adjustment. The appeal from this board is to the - shall be to the Pamlico County Superior Court. Any appeal to the Superior Court shall be taken within thirty days after the decision of the board is filed in such office as the ordinance specifies, or after a written copy thereof is delivered to the appellant, whichever is latter. We need to entertain a motion to adjourn the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Whorton - I make a motion that we adjourn the Board of Adjustment. Chairman Potter - Okay, all in favor raise your right hand. adjourn.) (It is noted that all members voted to,catherine Hurm, 'Town Manager 80f8
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. October 15, 2012
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Paul Sellman Dave Mail Diane Werner Elizabeth Howard Steve Balazs Arrived at 7:09 p.m. Heather Phile,
More informationCITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. September 15, 2014
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton Elizabeth Howard Heather Phile, Development
More informationCITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING April 18, Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Elizabeth Howard Dave Mail Paul Sellman Jona Burton Benjamin Tipton Bridget Susel, Community Development
More informationCITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING November 21, Benjamin Tipton Paul Sellman Elizabeth Howard
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBER ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Dave Mail Benjamin Tipton Paul Sellman Elizabeth Howard Jona Burton Heather Phile,
More informationSPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 18, 2015
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 18, 2015 Call to Order: Chairperson Wendt called the March 18, 2015 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to order at 7:30pm at the Springfield Township Civic
More informationFRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400
0001 1 FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING 2 FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMISSION 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 4 SECOND FLOOR COMMISSION CHAMBERS 5 400 EAST LOCUST STREET 6 UNION, MISSOURI 63084 7 8 9 TRANSCRIPT
More informationZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. November 14,2011 MINUTES
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS November 14,2011 MINUTES The Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Philipstown held a work session on Monday, November 14, 2011, at the Philipstown Town Hall, 238 Main Street,
More informationSUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8:00 P.M., JANUARY 2, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD
SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS :00 P.M., JANUARY, PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD - - - - - Held at Suffield Township Fire Department Community Room Waterloo Road, Mogadore,
More informationZBA 1/22/19 - Page 1
ZBA 1/22/19 - Page 1 CHILI ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS January 22, 2019 A meeting of the Chili Zoning Board was held on January 22, 2019 at the Chili Town Hall, 3333 Chili Avenue, Rochester, New York 14624
More informationBoise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1
Page 1 CVA14-00030 / SCOTT STEWART Location: 1493 W. Saint Patrick Street VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE STREET-SIDE SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO APPROXIMATELY 2 FEET AND REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO APPROXIMATELY
More informationCAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of March 25, :30 p.m.
CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Present - Board of Appeals Members: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé Administration: Assistant
More informationTOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. March 15, 2004
TOWN OF PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS March 15, 2004 The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Monday, March 15, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Monnett, Mr. Blevins, Mr. Shrum, Mr. Haase and Mr.
More informationTOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. September 9, 2010
TOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Approved The regular monthly meeting of the Town of Jerusalem Zoning Board was called to order on Thursday, September 9 th, 2010 at 7 pm by Chairman Glenn Herbert.
More informationTOWN OF WOODBURY Zoning Board of Appeals 281 Main Street South Woodbury, Connecticut TELEPHONE: (203) FAX: (203)
First land deed horn the Indians April 12th 1659 TOWN OF WOODBURY 281 Main Street South Woodbury, Connecticut 06798-0369 TELEPHONE: (203) 263-3467 FAX: (203) 263-5076 PUBLIC HEARING / REGULAR MEETING ZONING
More informationPLAN AND ZONING REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION
PLAN AND ZONING REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMISSION REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had before the Village of Northfield Plan and Zoning
More informationWilliam Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Catherine Wood, Secretary
PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman Absent: Mike Campanella, Vice Chairman John Pagliaccio Frank Wilton Mary (Molly) Flynn At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York,
More informationLIBERTY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Minutes of December 3, 2013
LIBERTY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Minutes of December 3, 2013 The Liberty Township Board of Zoning Appeals held a meeting and Public Hearing on December 3, 2013, in the Liberty Township Administrative
More informationMINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MEETING HOOVER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Date: Time: 5:30 PM Place: Hoover Municipal Center Present: Mr. Mike Wood, Chairman Mr. Ron Harris Ms. Mari Morrison Mr. Kelly Bakane Mr. Allen
More informationTown of Phippsburg Public Hearing / Remand of Lesser Buffer Permit Popham Beach Club August 29, 2006
Town of Phippsburg Public Hearing / Remand of Lesser Buffer Permit Popham Beach Club August 29, 2006 Note: The Phippsburg Board of Selectmen and the Planning Board approved a New Business application for
More informationCAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of November 20, :30 p.m.
CAUCUS PRIOR TO STRONGSVILLE BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING CODE APPEALS Meeting of 7:30 p.m. Board of Appeals Members Present: Kenneth Evans, Richard Baldin, John Rusnov, David Houlé, Tom Smeader Administration:
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: AUGUST 19,
More informationChairman, John Spooner opened the meeting at 6:03 PM and introduced the (3) members of the Zoning Board of Appeals which constitutes a quorum.
At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York, held at the Village Hall, East Aurora, New York on the 21 st day of May, 2015 PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman Michael
More informationPLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m.
PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, 2013 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Duffer: Good evening, I will now call to order the Plainfield Board of Zoning Appeals for February 21, 2013. ROLL CALL/DETERMINE
More informationZoning Board of Appeals Sheffield Lake, Ohio September 15, 2016
Zoning Board of Appeals Sheffield Lake, Ohio September 15, 2016 The meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held Thursday, September 15, 2016. Chairperson Diana Jancura called the meeting to order at
More information**TOWN OF GRAND ISLAND** ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. MINUTES November 2, 2017
**TOWN OF GRAND ISLAND** ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES November 2, 2017 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Chairman Marion Fabiano, Betty Harris, Bob Mesmer, Tim Phillips, Alternate Dan
More informationMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING 2 APPEALS OF HENRICO COUNTY, HELD IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 3 BUILDING IN THE GOVERNMENT CENTER AT PARHAM AND HUNGARY 4 SPRING ROADS, ON THURSDAY
More informationScript for Mock BOA Hearing
Script for Mock BOA Hearing CHAIR: Good morning and welcome everyone to the Board of Adjustment meeting of the Town of Buena Vista. We are going to hear one case today, number 04.01.2012, an application
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2015, AT 1:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2015, AT 1:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA PRESENT: Chairman, Larry Lauffer; Vice Chairman, Honey Minuse; Members: Don Croteau,
More informationCUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 130 Gillespie Street Fayetteville North Carolina (910)
Members: Vickie Mullins, Chairman George Lott, Vice-Chair George Turner Alfonso Ferguson Sr. Winton McHenry Alternates: Robert E Davis Nathan Galbreath Stacy Michael Long Alberta Ortiz Gregory Parks CUMBERLAND
More informationAGENDA TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 15, 2015, 6:00 P.M. COUNTY COMMISSION HEARING ROOM TANEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
TANEY COUNTY T a n e y C o u n t y P l a n n in g C o m m issio n P. O. Box 383 Forsyth, Missouri 65653 Phone: 417 546-7225 / 7226 Fax: 417 546-6861 website: www.tcmeycounty. org AGENDA TANEY COUNTY PLANNING
More informationLEE COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
LEE COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Ron Conderman, Chairperson Craig Buhrow, Vice Chairperson Mike Pratt, Member Gene Bothe, Member Tom Fassler, Member Bruce Forester, Alternate Member Chris Henkel, Zoning
More information1 PLANNING BOARD COUNTY OF ALBANY 3 *****************************************************
1 1 PLANNING BOARD COUNTY OF ALBANY 2 TOWN OF COLONIE 3 ***************************************************** 4 MABEY'S SELF STORAGE SPECIAL USE PERMIT 5 910 LOUDON ROAD SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW AND APPLICATION
More information/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419
1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File
More informationPresent: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie
Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting March 21, 2011 DRAFT Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Nathan Burgie Tom Burgie Jack Centner Ken Hanvey, Chairman Brian Malotte Sandra Hulbert Mitch Makowski Joe Polimeni Scott
More informationBEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Cathy Wolfe District One Diane Oberquell District Two Robert N. Macleod District Three Creating Solutions for Our Future HEARING EXAMINER BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE
More informationCITY OF WILDWOOD RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT WILDWOOD CITY HALL MAIN STREET MAY 16, 2013
CITY OF WILDWOOD RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT WILDWOOD CITY HALL 16860 MAIN STREET MAY 16, 2013 The meeting was called to order by Chair Garrett at 7:06 p.m. on May 16, 2013
More informationCharlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006
Charlottesville Planning Commission Preliminary Hearing - Franklin LLC PUD Site Plan Monday, April 11, 2006 Transcription services generously donated by Willoughby Parks, Woolen Mills resident CPC Members:
More informationZanesville City Council Meeting Monday, December 11, 2017
also Adrian Adornetto was here indicating his support of the initiative and it seems as if there is evidence they have planned it well, so there would be the least amount of disturbance. Mr. Baker: Very
More informationBAIL BOND BOARD MEETING. Judge Woods. Judge West. Judge Lively. Lt. Mills. Pat Knauth. Casi DeLaTorre. Theresa Goodness. Tim Funchess.
BAIL BOND BOARD MEETING 0 THOSE PRESENT: Judge Branick Judge Woods Judge West Judge Lively Lt. Mills Pat Knauth Casi DeLaTorre Theresa Goodness Tim Funchess Keith Day Mary Godina Liz Parks Glenda Segura
More informationMinutes: Watersmeet Township Planning Commission Regular Meeting of September 10, 2014
Minutes: Watersmeet Township Planning Commission Regular Meeting of September 10, 2014 Watersmeet High School Library 1) Meeting called to order by Chairman Roy D Antonio at 6:30 PM. 2) Pledge of Allegiance
More information* EXCERPT * Audio Transcription. Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board. Meeting, April 1, Judge William C.
Excerpt- 0 * EXCERPT * Audio Transcription Court Reporters Certification Advisory Board Meeting, April, Advisory Board Participants: Judge William C. Sowder, Chair Deborah Hamon, CSR Janice Eidd-Meadows
More informationOMEGA REAL ESTATE, LLC, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A DISTANCE OF LESS THAN 200 FEET OF THE NEAREST PORTION OF A DWELLING
1 STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF TRUMBULL LORDSTOWN VILLAGE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, MAY 13, 2013, AT 5:30 P.M. IN RE: CASE NO. 13 02 OMEGA REAL ESTATE, LLC, IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8
More informationJune 6, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, Jeff DeGroote
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 321 Causeway Drive, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 June 6, 2017 The Town of Wrightsville Beach Planning Board met at 6:00 p.m. in the Town Hall Council Chambers
More informationCurtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD
More informationCase 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 2 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationTOWN OF BEDFORD May 15, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
TOWN OF BEDFORD May 15, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES A regular meeting of the Bedford Zoning Board of Adjustment was held on Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 7:00 PM in the Bedford Meeting Room, 10
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
DATE: APRIL 21, 2010 CASE NO.: 4/21/2010-4 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 APPLICANT: LOCATION: 5 M S REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC 33 NASHUA ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 33
More informationMay 2, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Susan Snider, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, David Culp, Jeff DeGroote
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 321 Causeway Drive, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 May 2, 2017 The Town of Wrightsville Beach Planning Board met at 6:00 p.m. in the Town Hall Council Chambers located
More informationWilliam Kramer, Code Enforcement Officer Wendy Potter-Behling, Secretary
PRESENT: John Spooner, Chairman John Pagliaccio Mary (Molly) Flynn Bruce Mitchell Michael (Mike) Croft At a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Aurora, New York, held at the Village
More informationBRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, FOREMAN, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2)
MINUTES OF REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 2019 Vice Chairman Zapf called to order the regular meeting of the Board and announced the meeting was duly advertised in
More informationBecker County Board of Adjustments February 10, 2005
Becker County Board of Adjustments February 10, 2005 Present: Members Jerome Flottemesch, Tom Oakes, Harry Johnston, Jim Elletson, Terry Kalil, Zoning Administrator Patricia Johnson and Zoning Staff Debi
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
DATE: AUGUST 18, 2010 CASE NO.: 8/18/2010-3 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 APPLICANT: LOCATION: BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: ALSO PRESENT: REQUEST: FORTIER ENTERPRISES, INC.
More informationEdited lightly for readability and clarity.
Rep. Chris Collins Interview Conducted by Howard Owens The Batavian July 26, 2017 Edited lightly for readability and clarity. Q. It's been since July 5th that we talked and there has been all this hold
More informationNORTH BERWICK, MAINE, MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD JULY 8, 2010
1 NORTH BERWICK, MAINE, 03906 MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD JULY 8, 2010 Present: Chairman R. Todd Hoffman, Julie Fernee, Shaun DeWolf, Barry Chase, Patrick Raftery and Lawrence Huntley, CEO. Absent: Christopher
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF NORTHVILLE Zoning Board of Appeals October 17, 2018 DATE: October 17, 2018 APPROVED: November 14, 2018 TIME: 7:00 P.M. PLACE: Northville Township Hall 44405 Six Mile Road CALL TO ORDER:
More informationThe Gift of the Holy Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 5:23. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill
The Gift of the Holy Spirit 1 Thessalonians 5:23 Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill We've been discussing, loved ones, the question the past few weeks: Why are we alive? The real problem, in trying
More informationRoman: Mayor Cubillos has the motion, vice mayor has second, all in favor?
Roman: Today is January 15th, 2019, and we are opening up our Public Affairs Committee meeting. The first one of 2019. The time now is 6:37 PM. Let's take a moment of silent meditation before the Pledge
More informationMINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015
MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015 A regular meeting of the of the Borough of Madison was held on the 1st day of December 2015 at 7:30 P.M., in the Court
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH P.O. BOX 898 WINDHAM, NH 03087
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: MAY 20,
More informationFILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0"
FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 09/30/2015 10:09 PM INDEX NO. 2014EF5188 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2015 OCHIBIT "0" TRANSCRIPT OF TAPE OF MIKE MARSTON NEW CALL @September 2007 Grady Floyd:
More informationTOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL:
APPROVED 10/15/08 TOWN OF DOVER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, September 17, 2008, AT 7:00 PM AT THE DOVER TOWN HALL: PRESENT: Chair Marilyn VanMillon Member George Wittman
More informationDISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11
1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH LOUIS DE LA FLOR 116-B ROCKINGHAM ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: JULY
More informationPresent: Bob Bacon Guests: Kevin & Michelle Webb
Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting June 24, 2015 APPROVED Present: Bob Bacon Guests: Kevin & Michelle Webb John Holtz Phil Sommer-Code Tom Burgie, Chairman Enforcement Officer Bert Crofton Jon Gage Absent:
More informationTown of Alpine. Board of Adjustment /Planning & Zoning Commission MINUTES
DATE: July 13, 2004 Town of Alpine Board of Adjustment /Planning & Zoning Commission ******Dave Gustafson is excused for this meeting, Steve Fusco will be acting Chairman. Attending: Board members: Scott
More information1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 BEFORE THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG, JUDGE
1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 BEFORE THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG, JUDGE 4 -------------------------------) ) 5 Espanola Jackson, et al., ) ) 6 Plaintiffs, ) ) 7
More informationBOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
Town of Oak Island BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS Council Chambers Oak Island Town Hall 2 p.m. February 27, 2018 Call to Order: Approval of Minutes (10-18-17) Old Business: (none) New Business: (1) Variance Request
More informationTown of Northumberland Planning Board Minutes Monday, July 16, :00 pm Page 1 of 6 Approved by Planning Board with corrections
Page 1 of 6 Present: Lofgren Patricia Bryant, Chairperson, James Heber, Susan Martindale, Kevin Pumiglia, Joseph Kowalewski and CJ Absent: Brit Basinger, Vice-Chairperson, Jeff King and Wayne Durr Town
More informationPage 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Page 1 STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff, vs. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 3AN-06-05630 CI VOLUME 18 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS March 26, 2008 - Pages
More informationUNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT
0 THIS UNCERTIFIED DRAFT TRANSCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED OR PROOFREAD BY THE COURT REPORTER. DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BETWEEN THE UNCERTIFIED DRAFT VERSION AND THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT. (CCP (R)() When prepared
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AFFINITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT, : INC., a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action : No. 5813-VCP STEVEN V. CHANTLER, MATTHEW J. : RILEY
More informationHow Can I Cope with Stress?
From Pastor Jim s Desk March 2016 New Series on Life s Most Difficult Questions How Can I Cope with Stress? Jesus Christ was constantly under pressure. There were grueling demands on His time; He rarely
More informationMINUTES. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TUESDAY, January 10, 2012 AND CODE ENFORCEMENT. All persons giving testimony in this meeting have been sworn in.
MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TUESDAY, January 10, 2012 AND CODE ENFORCEMENT 5:30 PM ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: Bryan Harrison Dan Lowery Ed Slate Marge Thies Debbie Neal ALSO PRESENT: Denise Lee Shelley
More informationZanesvi lle City Council Meeting Monday, February 12, 2018
Zanesvi lle City Council Meeting Ordinance No. 18-23 - Introduced by Council - An Ordinance authorizing the proper City official to provide funds to the Transportation Improvement District Board for operational
More informationOCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 24, 2012
OCEANPORT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 24, 2012 Chairman Widdis called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. and announced that the meeting had been advertised in accordance with the Open Public Meetings
More informationMr. Oatney called the meeting to order and explained the procedures of the meeting.
The Zoning Board of Appeals met on Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:00 pm in the Lancaster City Schools Education Service Center, 111 S Broad Street, Lancaster, Ohio. Members present were Tim Oatney, Preston
More informationTOWNSHIP OF DERRY ZONING HEARING BOARD MEETING MINUTES November 14, 2012
CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Township of Derry Zoning Hearing Board was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman William Tafuto in the Meeting Room of the Derry Township Municipal Complex, 600 Clearwater
More informationCITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. April 20, Paul Sellman Benjamin Tipton Jona Burton Elizabeth Howard
CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Dave Mail Paul Sellman Benjamin Tipton Jona Burton Elizabeth Howard Heather Phile, Development Planner
More informationBRACCHITTA, ERICKSON, KUBISKY, WOLFSON, ZAPF, DUBOWSKY (ALT. #1) AND ZALEWSKI (ALT. #2) BOORADY, ENGINEER AND ALEXANDER (FILLING IN FOR LORBER)
MINUTES OF REGULAR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 2015 Vice Chairman Zapf called to order the regular meeting of the Board and announced the meeting was duly advertised
More informationBY-LAWS OF CHRIST CHURCH, DURHAM PARISH NANJEMOY, MARYLAND
BY-LAWS OF CHRIST CHURCH, DURHAM PARISH NANJEMOY, MARYLAND APPROVED MAY 4, 2008 (includes approved amendments of October 6, 2013) PREAMBLE (OFFICIAL STATEMENT) Christ Church, Durham Parish, Ironsides,
More informationPLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION
PLAN REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF A MEETING BEFORE THE VILLAGE OF NORTHFIELD PLAN AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMISSION REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had before the Village of Northfield Plan and Zoning Commission
More information>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ.
>> NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS DEMOTT VERSUS STATE. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. COUNSEL, MY NAME IS KEVIN HOLTZ. I REPRESENT THE PETITIONER, JUSTIN DEMOTT IN THIS CASE THAT IS HERE
More informationLONG ISLAND ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH HICKSVILLE, NEW YORK. This church shall be known as the Long Island Abundant Life Church.
LONG ISLAND ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH HICKSVILLE, NEW YORK "Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ." I Corinthians 1:3 We, the members of the Body of Christ, desiring that
More informationWHITE OAK BOROUGH ZONING HEARING BOARD MEETING MINUTES HELDJUNE 25, 2009
WHITE OAK BOROUGH ZONING HEARING BOARD MEETING MINUTES HELDJUNE 25, 2009 Zoning Hearing Board Members Present: David Preece Terry Farrell Zoning Hearing Board Members Absent: Phyllis Spiegel Keith Reigh,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE
More informationZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 268B MAMMOTH ROAD LONDONDERRY, NH 03053 DATE: APRIL
More information1 P age T own of Wappinger ZBA Minute
1 P age T own of Wappinger ZBA Minute 9-8 - 15 MINUTES Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals September 8, 2015 Time: 7:00PM Town Hall 20 Middlebush Road Wappinger Falls, NY Summarized Minutes Members:
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 11, :00 P.M. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Darby.
AUGUST 11, 2015 7:00 P.M. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Darby. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Richard Bauer, Don Darby, Robert Diehl, Carolyn Ghantous,
More informationTooele City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes
Tooele City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Tooele City Hall, Large Conference Room 90 North Main St., Tooele, Utah City Council Members Present:
More informationU.S. Senator John Edwards
U.S. Senator John Edwards Prince George s Community College Largo, Maryland February 20, 2004 Thank you. Thank you. Thank you all so much. Do you think we could get a few more people in this room? What
More informationPage Certificate of Shorthand Reporter Page 754
STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF LEE ) In the Matter of the Petition of Green River Wind Farm Phase 1, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company Lee County, Illinois Volume VII, Pages 753-870 Testimony
More informationPodcast 06: Joe Gauld: Unique Potential, Destiny, and Parents
Podcast 06: Unique Potential, Destiny, and Parents Hello, today's interview is with Joe Gauld, founder of the Hyde School. I've known Joe for 29 years and I'm very excited to be talking with him today.
More informationREGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY 1, :00 p.m.
0 0 0 0 REGULAR MEETING OF THE EXTRA-TERRITORIAL ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES DONA ANA COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICES MAY, 0 :00 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: John Villescas, Chairman Robert Hearn,
More informationFREEHOLD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 13, 2013
FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JUNE 13, 2013 Vice Chairman Decker called the Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting of to order at 7:30 p.m. He read the notice of the Open Public Meetings
More informationBYLAWS THE SUMMIT CHURCH HOMESTEAD HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. PREAMBLE ARTICLE I NAME
BYLAWS THE SUMMIT CHURCH HOMESTEAD HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. PREAMBLE For the purpose of preserving and making secure the principles of our faith and to the end that this body may be governed in an
More informationZoning Board of Appeals City of Rock Hill, South Carolina Date: August 20, 2013
Zoning Board of Appeals City of Rock Hill, South Carolina Date: August 20, 2013 A public hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held on Tuesday, August 20, 2013, at 6:30 PM in Council Chambers at City
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION GEORGE AND CHRISTINA FOWLER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION GEORGE AND CHRISTINA FOWLER VERSUS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, HAAG ENGINEERING, AND STEVE SAUCIER
More informationCumberland County Board of Adjustment
Members: Ed Donaldson, Chairman Melree Hubbard Tart, Vice-Chair Horace Humphrey Joseph Dykes Randy Newsome Alternates: William Lockett Tally Carrie Tyson-Autry Yvette Carson Vickie Mullins (Vacant) Cumberland
More information