Caption Case Type VANTASSEL ETAL VS ALFA LAVAL INC ETAL Ti MASS TORT ASBESTOS

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Caption Case Type VANTASSEL ETAL VS ALFA LAVAL INC ETAL Ti MASS TORT ASBESTOS"

Collin Hensley
5 years ago
Views:

1 COMMON PLEAS COURTS OF PHILADELPHIA CIVIL LISTING SECTION TRIAL WORK SHEET Event at // in Scheduled /1 JURY MT MASS TORT Caption Case Type VANTASSEL ETAL VS ALFA LAVAL INC ETAL Ti MASS TORT ASBESTOS Term and Number If Consolidated Term and Numbers TRiAL ACTUA1 TOTAL AMOUNT NUMBER OF DATE SHEET DAE JURY DAYS PEPARjD Diopostion Date PHASE II JURY VERDICT On March the jury found for the Plaintiff Fayd Van Tassel indivdua11y and as Administratrix of the Estate of Richard Van Tassel and against the Defendanta John Crane Inc Crane Company/Champman Crane CoO Crosby ValvesfNorthern Pumps Edward Valves Oarlock Sealing Technologies Oeorgia Pacific Honeywell International Inc Bendix IMO Industries Inc DeLaval Leslie Controls Inc Velan Valve Corp Warren Pumps Weir Valves/AM Valves Westinghouse CBSCorp UiowslCornpy andarway-copofatiw DEFAULT JUDGMENT/COURT ORDERED DISPOSITIVE MOTION GRANTED DIRECTED VERDICT DISCONTINUANCE ORDERED DISCONTINUE/TRANSFER BINDING ARE CONTINUED NEXT PAGE NON-JURY COMT STEWART NON-PROS ENTERED NON-SUIT ENTERED SETTLED PRIOR TO ASSIGNMENT FOR TRIAL TEAM LEADERSor1iy SETTLED AFTER ASSIGNMENT FOR TRIAL TRANSFERRED TO OTHER JURISDICTION OTHER EXPLAIN Vantasse Etal Vs Afa -WSJVP liii lillilitlilil liii j3jqj FULL DESCRIPTION OF DISPOSITION To Be Entered VERBATIM On The Docket PHASE JURY VERDICT On March 2010 the jury found for the Plaintiff Fayc Vim Tassel individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Richard Van Tassel in the amount of$ l20q FINDING FOR DEFENDANT FINDiNG FOR PLAINTIFF DAMAGES ASSESSED JUDGMENT ENTERED BY AGREEMENT JUDGMENT ENTERED JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF JURY VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT MISTRIAL HUNG JURY III COPIES TO PR CP 236b WILLAMS 03/26/2010

2 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PIIILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION FAYE VAN TASSEL individually and as DECEMBER TERM 2008 Admlnisfratrix of the Estate of RICHARD VAN TASSEL NO 1221 JOHN CRANE INC Question JURY VERDICT SHEET Has Plaintiff Fayc Van Tassel proven by preponderance of the evidence that Richard Van Tassel had an asbestos-caused mesothelioma YES NO Question State the amount of damages you award to Faye VanTassel as result of Richard VanTassels suffering from rnesothelioma under the Survival Act Physical pain mental anguish embarrassment and humiliation disfigurement discomfort and inconvenience Richard VanTassel from when he first began to experience symptoms caused by his mesothelioma to the moment of his death as result of mesothelioma ciicvt Faye VanTassels loss of consortium measured from the time that Mr Van Tassel first began to experience symptoms caused by his mesothelioma to the moment of his death as result of mesothelioma 2C1TL ACC-EST

3 IL Wronfu1 Death Act Loss of society comfort services support assistance and companionship to Faye VanTassel from the moment of Richard Van Tassels death through his life expectancy You may return to the Courtroom to render your verdict DA Si ture of Jury Foreperson ACC-EST

4 IN TILE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION FAYE VAN TASSEL individually and as DECEMBER TERM 2008 Administratrix of the Estate of RICHARD VAN TASSEL NO 1221 JOHN CRANE INC JURY VERDICT SHEET Were John Crane Inc.s asbestos products defective in that they lacked any warning or other instructions necessary to make them safe for use Yes No IF YOUR ANSWER TO QUESTION IS NO YOUR DELIBERATIONS ARE COMPLETE AND YOU CAN RETURN TO THE COURTROOM IF YOUR ANSWER IS YES PROCEED TO QUESTION Was it proven by preponderance of the evidence that Mr Van Tassels exposure to the following asbestos-containing products that were manufactured sold or supplied by the companies listed below was factual cause of his mesothelioma John Crane Inc YES NO Crane Company Chanipman Crane Co YES NO Crosby Valves/Northern Pumps YES NO Edward Valves YES NO Garlock Sealing Technologies YES NO ACC-EST

5 Georgia Pacific YES NO Honeywell International lnc Bendix YES NO IMO Jndustries Inc DeLaval YES NO Leslie Controls Inc YES NO Velan Valve Corp YES NO Warren Pumps YES NO Weir Valves/AM Valves YES NO Westinghouse CBS Corp YES NO William Powell Company YES NO Yarway Corporation YES NO You may return to the Courtroom to render your verdict DA Signature of Jury Forepernn ACC-EST

>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> THE NEXT CASE FOR THE DAY IS AUBIN V. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION.

>> ALL RISE. SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. PLEASE BE SEATED. >> THE NEXT CASE FOR THE DAY IS AUBIN V. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION. YOU MAY BEGIN. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M JAMES FORANO