PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0. Sanjeev Lath vs. City of Manchester, NH DEPOSITION OF PATROL OFFICER AUSTIN R. GOODMAN"

Transcription

1 1 PAGES: 1-24 EXHIBITS: 0 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH SS SUPERIOR NORTH DOCKET NO CV-821 Sanjeev Lath vs., NH DEPOSITION OF This deposition held pursuant to the New Hampshire Rules of Civil Procedure, at the New England Executive Center, 264 South River Road, Bedford, New Hampshire, on Friday, February 10, 2017, commencing at 10:02 a.m. DUFFY & McKENNA COURT REPORTERS P.O. Box 1658 Dover, NH (603)

2 1 APPEARANCES Sanjeev Lath, Pro Se 5 PO Box Hooksett, NH Slath1676@gmail.com 9 10 Page 2 11 McDONOUGH, O'SHAUGHNESSY, WHALAND & MEAGHER, PLLC 12 BY: Robert J. Meagher, Esq West Brook Street 14 Manchester, NH Rmeagher@lawfirmnh.com 17 For the Court Reporter: 22 P. Jodi Ohnemus, LCR #91, RPR, RMR, CRR 1 I N D E X 2 Page 3 3 TESTIMONY OF: PAGE (By Mr. Lath) Page 4 1 E X H I B I T S 2 EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE 3 4 Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked Choi Exhibit previously marked (There were no new exhibits marked.) Page 5 1, 2 having first been duly sworn, was 3 examined and testified as 4 follows 5 BY MR. LATH: 6 Q. Thank you, Officer. 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Could you please state your full name for the 9 record. 10 A. Sure. My name is Austin R. Goodman, A-u-s-t-i-n 11 R. G-o-o-d-m-a-n. 12 Q. Could you please state your employer's name. 13 A. Sure. Manchester, New Hampshire, Police 14 Department. 15 Q. And how long have you been working for the 16 Manchester Police Department? 17 A. Since October 2011, sir. 18 Q. Do you know what this deposition is regarding? A. I do, sir. 20 Q. I'm going to introduce Exhibit 1. I have it right 21 here, officer. 22 (Choi Exhibit 1, previously marked.) Q. And it's previously marked. (1) Pages 2-5

3 Page 6 Page 7 1 A. Okay. 2 Q. Please take a few moments to review this, and 3 please let me know when you're done. 4 MR. MEAGHER: And that was previously 5 marked as Choi No A. (Witness reviews document.) Okay, sir. 7 Q. Do you recall this incident at all? 8 A. I do. 9 Q. Could you just describe in your own words what 10 happened during this incident when you responded? 11 A. Basically we were dispatched to this address, 7 12 Northbook Drive, for a neighbor complaint. Prior 13 to arrival, the caller -- obviously it says here 14 "Gail," and I remember it from the report Q. Yeah. 16 A. -- that there was some yelling going on, and that 17 her neighbor in apartment 710 had -- was doing 18 some kicking in the hallway; and that you guys were arguing, basically. 20 Q. Did you witness any of this incident -- incidents 21 yourself? 22 A. I did not. Q. So it was all narrated to you by the caller, Gail 1 Labuda? 2 A. Correct. And her -- what she told us when we got 3 there. 4 Q. Sure. And as this call report states -- that the 5 neighbor in apartment 710 kicked her door, would 6 that be correct? That's what she alleged? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Okay. 9 MR. LATH: I'm going to do previously 10 marked Exhibit 2, Choi. 11 (Choi Exhibit 2, previously marked.) 12 Q. You don't have to read the whole document, just I want to focus on the interrogatory V-8, which is 14 on page MR. MEAGHER: And if I can just explain 16 to him what this is. 17 MR. LATH: Absolutely. 18 MR. MEAGHER: This is from another case that Mr. Lath has, where he sent written questions 20 under oath THE WITNESS: Okay. 22 MR. MEAGHER: -- to all these people. THE WITNESS: Okay. Page 8 1 MR. MEAGHER: And so it looks like these 2 were answered by a Dorothy Vachon on the last 3 page. 4 So they're not something from this case. 5 THE WITNESS: Okay. 6 MR. MEAGHER: Just to make it clear. 7 And he wants you to take a look at V -- as in 8 Victor A. Okay. (Witness reviews document.) Okay, sir. 10 Q. Yes. Now, these interrogatories were answered by 11 my neighbor, Dorothy Vachon, who lives in unit Do you recall speaking with anyone named 14 Dorothy Vachon at any time? 15 A. I don't. 16 Q. Don't. In her interrogatories she swears that 17 "Officer Chow [verbatim] and Goodman of the 18 Manchester Police Department came to my unit on November 25th and mentioned to me that Mr. Lath 20 had mental issues." 21 Do you recall anything -- speaking with 22 her on 11/25 of 2015? A. I do not. Page 9 1 Q. No. So would that be an incorrect statement? 2 A. The part of us speaking to them -- 3 Q. Yes. 4 A. -- since I don't recall? 5 I don't remember speaking with her. 6 Q. And you did not state to anyone that I had mental 7 health issues? 8 A. I did not -- no, I do not. 9 Q. Okay. That would be all I need from Exhibit Exhibit 3, which is an affidavit in the 11 case , previously marked as Choi Exhibit (Choi Exhibit 3, previously marked.) 14 Q. Please take a few minutes to review that A. Sure. 16 Q. -- and let me know when you're done. 17 A. No problem. (Witness reviews document.) 18 Okay, sir. Q. Did you see Ms. Labuda the day of -- which is 20 November 22nd of 2015? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. And did you speak with her? A. I didn't personally. I was just present. (2) Pages 6-9

4 Page 10 Page 11 1 Q. Okay. And did any of the incidents that's 2 described in the affidavit -- was witnessed by you 3 or your fellow officer? 4 A. Well, we didn't see what was being reported. 5 Obviously, what was being reported had already 6 occurred prior to our arrival. 7 So the answer to your question, no. 8 Q. Okay. And as it states in the affidavit that 9 "Cindy Camp watched him --" which would be me A. Sure. 11 Q. "-- through the peephole of Labuda's door." 12 Now, I'm going to introduce previously 13 marked Exhibits 4, 5, and (Choi Exhibit 5, previously marked.) 15 Q. Now, that would be Exhibit Now, would that be unit 709? You've 17 been to my unit a few times. 18 A. Yes. Q. So you recall A. Yes, sir. 21 Q. -- this hallway? 22 A. Yes. Q. Would that be the peephole, unit 709? 1 A. Yes. Yes. 2 Q. Okay. And previously marked Exhibit 6, could you 3 just state which wall is being referred to in this 4 affidavit -- in this picture? 5 (Choi Exhibit 6, previously marked.) 6 A. From my recollection, I believe it was the one 7 with the handrailing. 8 Q. Okay. In your opinion, can somebody see somebody 9 kick the wall through this peephole? 10 MR. MEAGHER: I'll object to the form. 11 Question's calling for speculation. 12 But you can go ahead and answer it if 13 you can. 14 A. I have no idea. 15 Q. Okay. 16 A. I mean, maybe if they were standing, looking at an 17 angle from inside, they may be able to see a 18 person. I mean, I have a peephole in my own apartment door. I can -- kind of -- see a little 20 perspective left and right, but it's limited. 21 Q. But, in your opinion, could anybody see their 22 feet? MR. MEAGHER: Same objection. Page 12 1 Go ahead and answer if you can. 2 A. Maybe. 3 MR. LATH: Previously marked Exhibit 4. 4 (Choi Exhibit 4, previously marked.) 5 Q. Now, would this be the hallway? 6 Now, you've been to my unit a couple of 7 times. 8 A. I have sir. 9 Yes, that's it. 10 Q. How many people can -- this hallway -- at the same 11 time walk through? A couple? 12 A. Yeah, probably a couple. 13 MR. MEAGHER: You mean side by side on 14 the stairs? 15 MR. LATH: Side by side MR. MEAGHER: On the stairs? 17 MR. LATH: Yeah. 18 A. Depending on their height and build. Q. Yeah. 20 A. I mean, if they were -- maybe two. You know, 21 maybe adult and a child. 22 But I would, again, say that height and build of the people -- to be fair. 1 Q. Thank you. 2 A. No problem. Page 13 3 Q. Did -- when you responded to the incident, did you 4 go inside Ms. Labuda's unit? 5 A. No, we didn't. We just spoke outside. 6 Q. And did you see any kind of camera recording 7 equipment inside her unit? 8 A. I did not. 9 Q. No. Did she mention anything about a camera or 10 recording device? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Besides Ms. Labuda, did you speak with anyone 13 else? 14 A. I did not. 15 Q. Did you see anybody else with Ms. Labuda on that 16 day? 17 A. I believe her family members, the Camps. 18 Q. The Camps. Did they provide any other name they 20 have used beside "Camps"? 21 A. Not to my knowledge. 22 Q. Okay. Do you recall if they provided a name called Cindy Shadler? (3) Pages 10-13

5 Page 14 Page 15 1 A. I do not remember that. 2 Q. Did they state where they lived or resided? 3 A. Not to me personally. 4 Q. Okay. Have you received any other calls from 5 Cindy Camp or Michael Camp regarding any other 6 harassment? 7 A. No, not since we were at your residence for that 8 specific call. 9 Q. Okay. One quick question from this exhibit is does Cindy Camp in the -- in the Exhibit 1, the 11 caller states that I kicked her door, and this 12 affidavit refers to kicking the wall. 13 So do you recall the narration of events 14 after you responded? 15 Was it the -- did Camp allege that I 16 kicked the door or the wall? 17 A. The wall. 18 Q. The wall? A. Near -- near the door. 20 Q. Near the door. 21 A. Yes. 22 MR. LATH: Okay. I'm going to do Exhibit 9, previously marked. 1 (Choi Exhibit 9, previously marked.) 2 Q. Just take a few minutes to review this. 3 A. Sure. (Witness reviews document.) 4 Okay, sir. No problem. 5 Q. And on page A. Sure. 7 Q. -- just above where the names are written, 8 "Barbara Belware" -- 9 A. Uh-huh. 10 Q. -- it states "It should be noted that another 11 neighbor opened his door, saw who we were speaking 12 to, and gave us a thumb's up." 13 Do you recall -- or have you seen that 14 neighbor anytime after this incident or spoken 15 to A. No, sir. 17 Q. All right. Do you know if it was on the same side 18 of my building, or the other side? A. I don't remember. 20 Q. Don't remember? 21 A. I'm sorry. 22 Q. And it talks about a note in the second paragraph on the top -- 1 A. Uh-huh. Page 16 2 Q. -- that "Lath has been placing notes of defamation 3 around the apartment building and on common 4 hallway billboards. 5 Did you happen to see any of those 6 notes? 7 A. I did not. 8 Q. No. Would that, in your opinion -- a note, unless 9 it's threatening -- would that be protected, or 10 would that be considered a criminal offense? 11 MR. MEAGHER: By that you mean protected 12 speech? 13 MR. LATH: Protected, yeah. You're 14 right. 15 Q. Would that be considered a criminal offense? 16 A. If it was nonthreatening? 17 Q. Yeah. 18 A. Probably not. Q. Did Ms. Labuda mention anything historically about 20 me harassing her, allegedly? 21 A. To me, no. 22 To Officer Choi, yes. Q. Okay. Do you recall what she stated? Page 17 1 A. I don't, but obviously what's notated in the 2 report. 3 Q. Okay. Did Officer Choi ask me for my shoes? 4 A. He did; yes. 5 Q. And at any point during the incident was I 6 disrespectful to either you or Officer Choi? 7 A. Are you asking for my personal opinion, or 8 professional opinion, or just in the totality of 9 the incident? 10 Q. Let me ask you your professional opinion: Was I 11 disrespectful? 12 A. Well, I certainly didn't take it personally. 13 Me personally, no. 14 Officer Choi, I can't speak for him. 15 In a law enforcement setting, I think 16 that maybe you could have cooperated a little bit 17 better. 18 Q. Okay. A. That's the best way I'll say that. 20 Q. Okay. 21 A. But I don't think you were -- I think you could 22 have cooperated better. I'll just leave it at that. (4) Pages 14-17

6 Page 18 Page 1 Q. Okay. Do I have a right to refuse my property 2 without a warrant? 3 MR. MEAGHER: Which property? Rather 4 than -- 5 MR. LATH: Any property that I own. 6 MR. MEAGHER: You mean shoes or... 7 MR. LATH: Shoes or anything I'm 8 wearing. 9 MR. MEAGHER: Refuse to hand over or MR. LATH: Yes. 11 A. You do in certain circumstances; yes. 12 Q. Okay. And did I assert that, that I would have 13 Officer Choi give me a warrant? 14 A. You did mention that; yes. 15 Q. Okay. And did Officer Choi enter my unit? 16 A. No, he did not. 17 Q. Did I ask him to leave; do you recall? 18 A. Well, we weren't inside, so I don't really recall. Since we weren't inside, you didn't really say to, 20 Get out of my unit. I don't think you wanted us 21 present in the hallway anymore. 22 Q. Just a few general questions: So after that incident, have you seen me before -- again? 1 A. I have, sir. 2 Q. Okay. And have I been disrespectful? 3 A. No, you weren't disrespectful. 4 Q. And have you spoken to any of my neighbors after 5 this incident regarding any other incidents? 6 A. Since I last saw you? 7 Q. Yes. 8 A. No, I have not. 9 Q. When was the last time you saw me? 10 A. The night of the fire in your apartment unit. I 11 don't remember the exact date, but Q. December 15th, A. Yes. 14 Q. I remember. They haven't fixed it yet. 15 A. Yeah, I understand. 16 Q. Did any of my neighbors mention anything regarding 17 the fire to you? 18 A. That night? I did not speak with any neighbors. Q. Following that night, did any of the neighbors 20 allege that I tried to burn the place down? 21 MR. MEAGHER: Allege to Austin Goodman? 22 MR. LATH: Yeah. Q. Or any of your fellow officers. Page 20 1 A. I can only speak for myself. I was the responding 2 officer. I took the initial report. So they 3 didn't say anything to me that night, and I 4 haven't been back, since I'm assigned to a 5 different part of the city now. 6 Q. Okay. And did you make a report of the fire 7 incident? 8 A. I did, sir. Yes, I did. 9 MR. LATH: Would you be willing to 10 produce that? 11 MR. MEAGHER: Yeah. At some point, 12 yeah; I guess. Yeah. 13 MR. LATH: Okay. 14 Q. Regarding the November 22nd, 2015 incident, was 15 there an arrest warrant issued? Are you aware? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. Yeah. Did you petition for the arrest warrant? 18 A. I did not, sir. Q. Okay. Do you know who did? 20 A. I do. 21 Q. Okay. Can you please state the name of the 22 person? A. Sure. Officer Andrew Choi. Page 21 1 Q. Do you know if I was ever arrested? 2 A. I actually don't. 3 Q. Did you go inside my unit on the day of the fire? 4 A. Did I, sir? 5 Yes. I was with you, if you remember. 6 Q. Yes. 7 Did you notice any holes -- anything 8 strange? 9 A. Besides that it was completely covered in smoke? 10 Q. Yeah. 11 A. Not to my recollection. 12 MR. LATH: Okay. I think that's all I 13 have. 14 THE WITNESS: No problem. 15 (Whereupon the deposition ended at 16 10: a.m.) (5) Pages 18-21

7 1 ERRATA SHEET 2 Page 22 3 I, Patrol Officer Austin R. Goodman, wish 4 to document the following corrections: PAGE LINE 8 9 REASON: 10 REASON: 11 REASON: 12 REASON: 13 REASON: 14 REASON: 15 REASON: 16 REASON: 17 REASON: 18 REASON: REASON: 20 REASON: 21 REASON: 22 REASON: REASON: 1 SUBSCRIPTION OF DEPONENT 2 State of 3 County of Page 7 I, Patrol Officer Austin R. Goodman, do 8 hereby certify that I have read the foregoing 9 transcript of my testimony and further certify 10 that said transcript (with/without) suggested 11 corrections on the Errata Sheet is a true and 12 accurate record of said testimony taken at the 13 time and place designated Signed under the pains and penalties of 18 perjury this day of, Patrol Officer Austin R. Goodman 1 C E R T I F I C A T E 2 Page 24 3 I, Patricia Jodi Ohnemus, a Licensed Shorthand Reporter for the State of New Hampshire, 4 do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate transcript of my stenographic notes of 5 the proceeding taken at the place and on the date hereinbefore set forth to the best of my skill and 6 ability under the conditions present at the time. 7 I further certify that I am neither attorney or counsel for, nor related to or 8 employed by any of the parties to the action in which this proceeding was taken, and further that 9 I am not a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed in this case, nor am I 10 financially interested in this action. 11 The foregoing certification of this transcript does not apply to any reproduction of 12 the same by any means unless under the direct control and/or direction of the certifying 13 reporter Patricia Jodi Ohnemus LCR #91, RMR, RPR, CRR (6) Pages 22-24

8 [verbatim] (1) 8:17 [ A able (1) 11:17 above (1) 15:7 Absolutely (1) 7:17 actually (1) 21:2 address (1) 6:11 adult (1) 12:21 affidavit (5) 9:10;10:2,8;11:4;14:12 again (2) 12:22;18: ahead (2) 11:12;12:1 allege (3) 14:15;:20,21 alleged (1) 7:6 allegedly (1) 16:20 Andrew (1) 20: angle (1) 11:17 answered (2) 8:2,10 anymore (1) 18:21 apartment (5) 6:17;7:5;11:;16:3; :10 arguing (1) 6: around (1) 16:3 arrest (2) 20:15,17 arrested (1) 21:1 arrival (2) 6:13;10:6 assert (1) 18:12 assigned (1) 20:4 AUSTIN (3) 5:1,10;:21 A-u-s-t-i-n (1) 5:10 aware (1) 20:15 back (1) 20:4 Barbara (1) 15:8 Basically (2) 6:11, Belware (1) 15:8 beside (1) 13:20 Besides (2) 13:12;21:9 best (1) 17: better (2) 17:17,22 billboards (1) 16:4 bit (1) 17:16 build (2) 12:18, building (2) 15:18;16:3 burn (1) :20 B C call (2) 7:4;14:8 called (1) 13: caller (3) 6:13,;14:11 calling (1) 11:11 calls (1) 14:4 came (1) 8:18 camera (2) 13:6,9 Camp (5) 10:9;14:5,5,10,15 Camps (3) 13:17,18,20 can (9) 7:15;11:8,12,13,;12:1, 10;20:1,21 case (3) 7:18;8:4;9:11 certain (1) 18:11 certainly (1) 17:12 child (1) 12:21 Choi (17) 5:22;6:5;7:10,11;9:11,13; 10:14;11:5;12:4;15:1; 16:22;17:3,6,14;18:13,15; 20: Chow (1) 8:17 Cindy (4) 10:9;13:;14:5,10 circumstances (1) 18:11 city (1) 20:5 clear (1) 8:6 common (1) 16:3 complaint (1) 6:12 completely (1) 21:9 considered (2) 16:10,15 cooperated (2) 17:16,22 couple (3) 12:6,11,12 covered (1) 21:9 criminal (2) 16:10,15 D date (1) :11 day (3) 9:;13:16;21:3 December (1) :12 defamation (1) 16:2 Department (3) 5:14,16;8:18 Depending (1) 12:18 deposition (2) 5:18;21:15 describe (1) 6:9 described (1) 10:2 device (1) 13:10 different (1) 20:5 dispatched (1) 6:11 disrespectful (4) 17:6,11;:2,3 document (5) 6:6;7:12;8:9;9:17;15:3 done (2) 6:3;9:16 door (8) 7:5;10:11;11:;14:11, 16,,20;15:11 Dorothy (3) 8:2,11,14 down (1) :20 Drive (1) 6:12 duly (1) 5:2 during (2) 6:10;17:5 E either (1) 17:6 else (2) 13:13,15 employer's (1) 5:12 ended (1) 21:15 enforcement (1) 17:15 enter (1) 18:15 equipment (1) 13:7 events (1) 14:13 exact (1) :11 examined (1) 5:3 Exhibit (18) 5:20,22;7:10,11;9:9,10, 11,13;10:14,15;11:2,5;12:3, 4;14:9,10,;15:1 Exhibits (1) 10:13 explain (1) 7:15 F fair (1) 12: family (1) 13:17 feet (1) 11:22 fellow (2) 10:3;: few (5) 6:2;9:14;10:17;15:2; 18:22 fire (4) :10,17;20:6;21:3 first (1) 5:2 fixed (1) :14 (1) [verbatim] - fixed

9 focus (1) 7:13 Following (1) : follows (1) 5:4 form (1) 11:10 full (1) 5:8 G Gail (2) 6:14, gave (1) 15:12 general (1) 18:22 GOODMAN (4) 5:1,10;8:17;:21 G-o-o-d-m-a-n (1) 5:11 guess (1) 20:12 guys (1) 6:18 H hallway (6) 6:18;10:21;12:5,10;16:4; 18:21 Hampshire (1) 5:13 hand (1) 18:9 handrailing (1) 11:7 happen (1) 16:5 happened (1) 6:10 harassing (1) 16:20 harassment (1) 14:6 health (1) 9:7 height (2) 12:18,22 historically (1) 16: holes (1) 21:7 idea (1) 11:14 incident (11) 6:7,10,20;13:3;15:14; 17:5,9;18:;:5;20:7,14 I incidents (3) 6:20;10:1;:5 incorrect (1) 9:1 initial (1) 20:2 inside (6) 11:17;13:4,7;18:18,; 21:3 interrogatories (2) 8:10,16 interrogatory (1) 7:13 introduce (2) 5:20;10:12 issued (1) 20:15 issues (2) 8:20;9:7 kick (1) 11:9 kicked (3) 7:5;14:11,16 kicking (2) 6:18;14:12 kind (2) 11:;13:6 knowledge (1) 13:21 K L Labuda (5) 7:1;9:;13:12,15;16: Labuda's (2) 10:11;13:4 last (3) 8:2;:6,9 LATH (18) 5:5;7:9,17,;8:;12:3, 15,17;14:22;16:2,13;18:5,7, 10;:22;20:9,13;21:12 law (1) 17:15 leave (2) 17:22;18:17 left (1) 11:20 limited (1) 11:20 little (2) 11:;17:16 lived (1) 14:2 lives (1) 8:11 long (1) 5:15 look (1) 8:7 looking (1) 11:16 looks (1) 8:1 M Manchester (3) 5:13,16;8:18 many (1) 12:10 marked (15) 5:22,;6:5;7:10,11;9:11, 13;10:13,14;11:2,5;12:3,4; 14:;15:1 may (1) 11:17 maybe (5) 11:16;12:2,20,21;17:16 MEAGHER (16) 6:4;7:15,18,22;8:1,6; 11:10,;12:13,16;16:11; 18:3,6,9;:21;20:11 mean (6) 11:16,18;12:13,20;16:11; 18:6 members (1) 13:17 mental (2) 8:20;9:6 mention (4) 13:9;16:;18:14;:16 mentioned (1) 8: Michael (1) 14:5 minutes (2) 9:14;15:2 moments (1) 6:2 myself (1) 20:1 N name (6) 5:8,10,12;13:,22;20:21 named (1) 8:13 names (1) 15:7 narrated (1) 6: narration (1) 14:13 near (3) 14:,,20 need (1) 9:9 neighbor (6) 6:12,17;7:5;8:11;15:11, 14 neighbors (4) :4,16,18, New (1) 5:13 night (4) :10,18,;20:3 nonthreatening (1) 16:16 Northbook (1) 6:12 notated (1) 17:1 note (2) 15:22;16:8 noted (1) 15:10 notes (2) 16:2,6 notice (1) 21:7 November (3) 8:;9:20;20:14 O oath (1) 7:20 object (1) 11:10 objection (1) 11: obviously (3) 6:13;10:5;17:1 occurred (1) 10:6 October (1) 5:17 offense (2) 16:10,15 OFFICER (13) 5:1,6,21;8:17;10:3;16:22; 17:3,6,14;18:13,15;20:2, officers (1) : one (2) 11:6;14:9 only (1) 20:1 opened (1) 15:11 opinion (6) 11:8,21;16:8;17:7,8,10 out (1) 18:20 outside (1) 13:5 over (1) 18:9 own (3) 6:9;11:18;18:5 page (3) P (2) focus - page

10 7:14;8:3;15:5 paragraph (1) 15:22 part (2) 9:2;20:5 PATROL (1) 5:1 peephole (4) 10:11,;11:9,18 people (3) 7:22;12:10, person (2) 11:18;20:22 personal (1) 17:7 personally (4) 9:;14:3;17:12,13 perspective (1) 11:20 petition (1) 20:17 picture (1) 11:4 place (1) :20 placing (1) 16:2 please (6) 5:8,12;6:2,3;9:14;20:21 point (2) 17:5;20:11 Police (3) 5:13,16;8:18 present (2) 9:;18:21 previously (15) 5:22,;6:4;7:9,11;9:11, 13;10:12,14;11:2,5;12:3,4; 14:;15:1 Prior (2) 6:12;10:6 probably (2) 12:12;16:18 problem (4) 9:17;13:2;15:4;21:14 produce (1) 20:10 professional (2) 17:8,10 property (3) 18:1,3,5 protected (3) 16:9,11,13 provide (1) 13: provided (1) 13:22 Question's (1) 11:11 quick (1) Q 14:9 R Rather (1) 18:3 read (1) 7:12 really (2) 18:18, recall (11) 6:7;8:13,21;9:4;10:; 13:22;14:13;15:13;16:; 18:17,18 received (1) 14:4 recollection (2) 11:6;21:11 record (1) 5:9 recording (2) 13:6,10 referred (1) 11:3 refers (1) 14:12 refuse (2) 18:1,9 regarding (5) 5:18;14:5;:5,16;20:14 remember (8) 6:14;9:5;14:1;15:,20; :11,14;21:5 report (5) 6:14;7:4;17:2;20:2,6 reported (2) 10:4,5 resided (1) 14:2 residence (1) 14:7 responded (3) 6:10;13:3;14:14 responding (1) 20:1 review (3) 6:2;9:14;15:2 reviews (4) 6:6;8:9;9:17;15:3 right (5) 5:20;11:20;15:17;16:14; 18:1 S Same (3) 11:;12:10;15:17 saw (3) 15:11;:6,9 second (1) 15:22 sent (1) 7: setting (1) 17:15 Shadler (1) 13: shoes (3) 17:3;18:6,7 side (6) 12:13,13,15,15;15:17,18 smoke (1) 21:9 somebody (2) 11:8,8 sorry (1) 15:21 speak (5) 9:22;13:12;17:14;:18; 20:1 speaking (5) 8:13,21;9:2,5;15:11 specific (1) 14:8 speculation (1) 11:11 speech (1) 16:12 spoke (1) 13:5 spoken (2) 15:14;:4 stairs (2) 12:14,16 standing (1) 11:16 state (6) 5:8,12;9:6;11:3;14:2; 20:21 stated (1) 16: statement (1) 9:1 states (4) 7:4;10:8;14:11;15:10 strange (1) 21:8 Sure (8) 5:10,13;7:4;9:15;10:10; 15:3,6;20: swears (1) 8:16 sworn (1) 5:2 T talks (1) 15:22 testified (1) 5:3 threatening (1) 16:9 thumb's (1) 15:12 times (2) 10:17;12:7 told (1) 7:2 took (1) 20:2 top (1) 15: totality (1) 17:8 tried (1) :20 two (1) 12:20 U under (1) 7:20 unit (12) 8:11,18;10:16,17,; 12:6;13:4,7;18:15,20; :10;21:3 unless (1) 16:8 up (1) 15:12 used (1) 13:20 V-8 (1) 7:13 Vachon (3) 8:2,11,14 Victor (1) 8:8 V W walk (1) 12:11 wall (6) 11:3,9;14:12,16,17,18 wants (1) 8:7 warrant (4) 18:2,13;20:15,17 watched (1) 10:9 way (1) 17: wearing (1) 18:8 weren't (3) 18:18,;:3 what's (1) 17:1 Whereupon (1) 21:15 whole (1) 7:12 willing (1) (3) paragraph - willing

11 20:9 without (1) 18:2 Witness (9) 6:6,20;7:21,;8:5,9; 9:17;15:3;21:14 witnessed (1) 10:2 words (1) 6:9 working (1) 5:15 written (2) 7:;15:7 yelling (1) 6:16 Y 1 1 (4) 5:20,22;6:5;14:10 10: (1) 21:16 11/25 (1) 8: (1) 9:11 15th (1) : (3) 10:13;11:2,5 7 (1) 6: (2) 10:16, 710 (2) 6:17;7:5 712 (1) 8:12 8 (1) 8: (3) 7:14;14:;15:1 2 (3) 7:10,11;9: (1) 5: (3) 8:22;9:20;20: (1) :12 22nd (2) 9:20;20:14 25th (1) 8: 3 (3) 9:10,12, (4) 10:13;12:3,4;15:5 5 (3) 10:13,14,15 5 (4) without - 9

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003

Curtis L. Johnston Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al June 30, 2003 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD

More information

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC Filing # 7828 E-Filed 09//2018 07:41 : PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CRIMINAL NO. l5-oo6cfano STATE OF FLORIDA, VS. JOHN N. JONCHUCK,

More information

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY 1 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY 2 MILWAUKEE BRANCH OF THE NAACP 3 VOCES DE LA FRONTERA, RICKY T. LEWIS, JENNIFER T. PLATT, JOHN J. WOLFE, 4 CAROLYN ANDERSON, NDIDI BROWNLEE, ANTHONY FUMBANKS,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA 0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FORSYTH COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD of ETHICS, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) CASE NO: 0CV-00 ) TERENCE SWEENEY, ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR COMPLAINT HEARD BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

CASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. /

CASE NO.: BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Page 1 CASE NO.: 07-12641-BKC-AJC IN RE: LORRAINE BROOKE ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. / Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A. 100 Southeast 2nd Avenue

More information

GAnthony-rough.txt. Rough Draft IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

GAnthony-rough.txt. Rough Draft IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Rough Draft - 1 GAnthony-rough.txt 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND 2 FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 ZENAIDA FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, 4 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 5 vs. CASE NO.:

More information

INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER

INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER INTERVIEW OF: CHARLES LYDECKER DATE TAKEN: MARCH 1, TIME: :0 P.M. - : P.M. PLACE: BROWN & BROWN 0 SOUTH RIDGEWOOD AVENUE DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA 1 1 --0 1 1 APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney &

More information

INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS

INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS INTERVIEW OF: TIMOTHY DAVIS DATE TAKEN: MARCH, TIME: : A.M. - : A.M. PLACE: HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON BILL FRANCE BOULEVARD DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney & Olivari,

More information

Case 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION

Case 2:13-cr FVS Document 369 Filed 05/09/14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SPOKANE DIVISION 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. :-CR-000-FVS ) RHONDA LEE FIRESTACK-HARVEY, ) LARRY LESTER

More information

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST 4, 2014 RENO, NEVADA

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST 4, 2014 RENO, NEVADA STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO, NEVADA TRANSCRIPT OF ELECTRONICALLY-RECORDED INTERVIEW JOHN MAYER AUGUST, RENO, NEVADA Transcribed and proofread by: CAPITOL REPORTERS BY: Michel Loomis

More information

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of STTE OF MINNESOT DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Chrishaun Reed McDonald, District Court File No. -CR-- TRNSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Defendant. The

More information

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did.

Condcnsclt! Page 1. 6 Part 9. I don't think I could have anticipated the snow. 7 and your having to be here at 1:30 any better than I did. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND STATE OF MARYLAND, V. ADNAN SYEO, BEFORE: Defendant. Indictment Nos. 199100-6 REPORTER'S OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Trial on the Merita) Baltimore.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/01/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 431 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2018 1 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL TERM : PART 17 2 -------------------------------------------------X LAWRENCE KINGSLEY 3 Plaintiff 4 - against - 5 300 W. 106TH ST. CORP.

More information

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3 J.F., et al., ) 4 Plaintiffs, ) 3:14-cv-00581-PK ) 5 vs. ) April 15, 2014 ) 6 MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL ) Portland, Oregon DISTRICT

More information

STIDHAM: Okay. Do you remember being dispatched to the Highland Trailer Park that evening?

STIDHAM: Okay. Do you remember being dispatched to the Highland Trailer Park that evening? Testimony of James Dollahite in Misskelley trial Feb 1994 STIDHAM: Would you please state your name for the Court? DOLLAHITE: James Dollahite. STIDHAM: And where are you employed Officer Dollahite? DOLLAHITE:

More information

A P P E A R A N C E S FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MR. DIRRELL S. JONES (BY TELEPHONE) ASSISTANT DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL State Bar of Texas Office of the Chief

A P P E A R A N C E S FOR THE PLAINTIFF: MR. DIRRELL S. JONES (BY TELEPHONE) ASSISTANT DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL State Bar of Texas Office of the Chief CUSE NO. 380-01407-2013 COMMISSION FOR LWYER )( IN THE DISTRICT COURT DISCIPLINE, )( )( Plaintiff, )( )( VS. )( 380th JUDICIL DISTRICT )( TY CLEVENGER, )( )( Defendant. )( COLLIN COUNTY, TEXS ---------------------------------------------------------------

More information

5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7

5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO Case No: SC JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR / 7 1 1 2 3 BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION 4 5 INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO. 04-239 Case No: SC05-851 6 JUDGE RICHARD H. ALBRITTON, JR. --------------------------------------/ 7 8 9

More information

ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2

ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEN ANDERSON VOLUME 2 CAUSE NO. 86-452-K26 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff(s) Page 311 VS. ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS MICHAEL MORTON Defendant(s). ) 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION

More information

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11 1 NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR 13 DHC 11 E-X-C-E-R-P-T THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, ) ) PARTIAL TESTIMONY Plaintiff, ) OF )

More information

Case 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 85. 2:13-cv RFB-NJK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 85. 2:13-cv RFB-NJK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document - Filed // Page of :-cv-00-rfb-njk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, INTELIGENTRY, LIMITED, et al., Defendants.

More information

2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your. 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir.

2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your. 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir. 38 1 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 2 THE COURT: All right. Please raise your 3 right hand. 4 CHARLES BRODSKY, 5 having been first duly sworn, testified as follows: 6 THE COURT: All right, sir. You may take 7

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : : :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : : : 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO. v. MURRAY ROJAS -CR-00 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS JURY TRIAL TESTIMONY

More information

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NORTH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, Defendants.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NORTH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, Defendants. EXHIBIT B STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NORTH LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NH, ET AL., vs. Plaintiffs, WILLIAM M. GARDNER & GORDAN MACDONALD, Defendants. Superior Court Case No.

More information

/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419

/10/2007, In the matter of Theodore Smith Associated Reporters Int'l., Inc. Page 1419 1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v. 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 3020-a Education Law Proceeding (File

More information

Deposition of Karl Willers taken 11/21/14 Weldon & Associates (952)

Deposition of Karl Willers taken 11/21/14 Weldon & Associates (952) 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3 4 5 File No. 13-CV-266 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Forest Olivier et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 vs. 10 11 Karl Willers et al., 12 Defendants.

More information

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:08-cv-00575-GLF-NMK Document 79-4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of Page 11 4680 IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF JOHN

More information

saw online, change what you're telling us today? MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, Your Honor. (Witness excused.

saw online, change what you're telling us today? MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLLA: Yes, Your Honor. (Witness excused. saw online, change what you're telling us today? No, sir. MR. GUY: Thank you, ma'am. THE COURT: ll right. May she be excused? MR. GUY: Yes, sir. MR. STROLL: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: ll right. Thank

More information

Tuesday, February 12, Washington, D.C. Room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 10

Tuesday, February 12, Washington, D.C. Room 2247, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 10 1 RPTS DEN DCMN HERZFELD COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT ND GOVERNMENT REFORM, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTTIVES, WSHINGTON, D.C. TELEPHONE INTERVIEW OF: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 Washington, D.C. The telephone interview

More information

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE: CYNTHIA A. HOLLOWAY NO.: 00-143 / Florida Supreme Court AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES TO: The Honorable

More information

A & T TRANSCRIPTS (720)

A & T TRANSCRIPTS (720) THE COURT: ll right. Bring the jury in. nd, Mr. Cooper, I'll ask you to stand and be sworn. You can wait till the jury comes in, if you want. (Jury present at :0 a.m.) THE COURT: Okay, Mr. Cooper, if you'll

More information

: : : : : : : : : HONORABLE ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

: : : : : : : : : HONORABLE ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CIVIL PART MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-- (AS) APP. DIV. NO. JOHN BURTON, v. Plaintiff, AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CORP., et al., Defendants. TRANSCRIPT

More information

Page 1. Page 2. Page 4 1 (Pages 1 to 4) Page 3

Page 1. Page 2. Page 4 1 (Pages 1 to 4) Page 3 IN THE DISTRICT COURT DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 162ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT J.S., S.L., L.C. vs. Plaintiffs, VILLAGE VOICE MEDIA HOLDINGS, L.L.C., D/B/A BACKPAGE.COM; CAUSE NO. DC-16-14700 BACKPAGE.COM, L.L.C.;

More information

CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, Plaintiffs,

CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, Plaintiffs, CAMERON SANDERS and KEVIN S. SANDERS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2012-CA-008487-XXXX-MA DIVISION: CV-H vs. Plaintiffs, NEWPORT UNIT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : OF V. :

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : OF V. : 0 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : DAUPHIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA V. : TIMOTHY MARK CURLEY : No. CP--MD--0 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF :

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA I N D E X T O W I T N E S S E S TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al : : CASE NO. v. : :0-CR-00 : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, : et al : FOR

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, ) 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 0--PHX-GMS Phoenix,

More information

Case 1:06-cv WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 110

Case 1:06-cv WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 110 Case 1:06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW Document 150 Filed 09/12/08 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 558 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 2 Civil Action No. 06-cv-01135-WYD-MJW 3 ALLSTATE INSURANCE

More information

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5

Case 3:10-cv GPC-WVG Document Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 1 of 30 EXHIBIT 5 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 388-4 Filed 03/07/15 Page 2 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

A. She worked in the White House for a while, first as an intern, and then in the legislative affairs office.

A. She worked in the White House for a while, first as an intern, and then in the legislative affairs office. Excerpt from President Clinton s deposition on January 17, 1998, in the civil action brought against him by Paula Jones. James Fisher led the questioning for Jones. The President was defended by Bob Bennett.

More information

UNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT

UNOFFICIAL, UNEDITED, UNCERTIFIED DRAFT 0 THIS UNCERTIFIED DRAFT TRANSCRIPT HAS NOT BEEN EDITED OR PROOFREAD BY THE COURT REPORTER. DIFFERENCES WILL EXIST BETWEEN THE UNCERTIFIED DRAFT VERSION AND THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT. (CCP (R)() When prepared

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and LAWRENCE COHEN, ) 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN, ) and

More information

4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the

4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 8 THE COURT: All right. Feel free to. 9 adjust the chair and microphone. And if one of the 154 1 (Discussion off the record.) 2 Good afternoon, sir. 3 THE WITNESS: Afternoon, Judge. 4 THE COURT: Raise your right hand, 5 please. 6 (Witness sworn.) 7 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: All right.

More information

ZAHN, HALL & ZAHN, LTD. Tel: (757) Fax: (757)

ZAHN, HALL & ZAHN, LTD. Tel: (757) Fax: (757) 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 3 4 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) 6 ) CRIMINAL ACTION v. ) NO. 00-0284 (MJJ) 7 ) PAVEL IVANOVICH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION IN RE SPRINGFIELD GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION ) ) ) ) CASE NO. -MC-00 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 0 JULY, TRANSCRIPT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA. CASE NO. 10CO PL-088 Special Appointed Judge: Susan Orth

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA. CASE NO. 10CO PL-088 Special Appointed Judge: Susan Orth IN THE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 2 FOR CLARK COUNTY STATE OF INDIANA STATE OF INDIANA, vs. Plaintiff KEVIN ZIPPERLE, MARY LOU TRAUTWEIN- LAMKIN, SHARON CHANDLER, and FRANK PRELL CASE NO. 10CO2-1208-PL-088 Special

More information

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, 05 CF 381 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: September 28, 2009 9 BEFORE:

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 1 IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AFFINITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT, : INC., a Delaware corporation, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action : No. 5813-VCP STEVEN V. CHANTLER, MATTHEW J. : RILEY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MICHAEL GARBOWSKI and STEPHEN ) BUSHANSKY, On Behalf of Themselves ) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) Plaintiffs, v. ) TOKAI PHARMACEUTICALS,

More information

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION

COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD. Docket # 1850 DECISION COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S MERIT BOARD Sheriff of Cook County vs. Jacquelyn G. Anderson Cook County Deputy Sheriff Docket # 1850 DECISION THIS MATTER COMING ON to be heard pursuant to notice, the Cook County

More information

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786 Case: 5:09-cv-00244-KSF-REW Doc #: 30 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 96 - Page ID#: 786 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-00244-KSF VIDEOTAPED

More information

Indictment THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNTl [False Declarations Before Grand Jury]

Indictment THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNTl [False Declarations Before Grand Jury] U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED f':~'1:',, ~ lv< ;' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO~AWRENCE ~ L~~~~MAN, CLERK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. /:14-CR-f/~(,/.$

More information

EXHIBIT 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S.

EXHIBIT 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S. EXHIBIT 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. -CV-000-RBJ LIST INTERACTIVE LTD., d/b/a Uknight Interactive; and LEONARD S. LABRIOLA, Plaintiffs, vs. KNIGHTS

More information

THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT)

THE COURT: All right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: Agent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PAUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT) not released. MR. WESTLING: Yes. I was just going to say that. THE COURT: ll right. Call your next witness. MR. JOHNSON: gent Mullen, Terry Mullen. (BRIEF PUSE) (MR. MULLEN PRESENT) THE COURT: Sir, if

More information

1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3

1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 1 2 THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3 4 In the Matter of 5 THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION v 6 THEODORE SMITH 7 Section 30-a Education Law Proceeding (File#

More information

American Legal Transcription 11 Market Street - Suite Poughkeepsie, NY Tel. (845) Fax: (845)

American Legal Transcription 11 Market Street - Suite Poughkeepsie, NY Tel. (845) Fax: (845) Exhibit A Evid. Hrg. Transcript Pg of UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------- In Re: Case No. 0-000-rdd CYNTHIA CARSSOW FRANKLIN, Chapter White Plains,

More information

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA Page 1 STATE OF ALASKA, Plaintiff, vs. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 3AN-06-05630 CI VOLUME 18 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS March 26, 2008 - Pages

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA................ TAMMY KITZMILLER; BRYAN and. CHRISTY REHM; DEBORAH FENIMORE. and JOEL LIEB; STEVEN STOUGH;. BETH EVELAND; CYNTHIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS *

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS * COMMONWELTH OF MSSCHUSETTS Volume: Pages: - Exhibits: None BRISTOL, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPRTMENT OF THE TRIL COURT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COMMONWELTH OF MSSCHUSETTS * * vs. * * RON HERNNDEZ

More information

OFFICIAL REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19. Respondent, Charging Party.

OFFICIAL REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19. Respondent, Charging Party. OFFICIL REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE NTIONL LBOR RELTIONS BORD REGION In the Matter of: IM erospace Sumner, Inc., Respondent, Case Nos. -C-0 -C-0 and International ssociation of Machinists, District,

More information

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT NYANG MAJ. C. DAVID RUVOLA JANUARY 11, 1997 (19 pages)

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC. INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT NYANG MAJ. C. DAVID RUVOLA JANUARY 11, 1997 (19 pages) DOCKET NO. SA- APPENDIX R NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, DC INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT NYANG MAJ. C. DAVID RUVOLA JANUARY, 1 (1 pages) I BEFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION

More information

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 24 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 45 - Page ID#: 490

Case: 5:09-cv KSF-REW Doc #: 24 Filed: 09/28/10 Page: 1 of 45 - Page ID#: 490 Case: :0-cv-00-KSF-REW Doc #: Filed: 0// Page: of - Page ID#: 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. :0-CV-00-KSF DEPOSITION OF JAMES KRUPA, Ph.D.

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817 Case: 1:13-cv-05014 Document #: 107 Filed: 04/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1817 J. DAVID JOHN, United States of America, ex rel., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

More information

Page 1. Case 1:09-cv CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129

Page 1. Case 1:09-cv CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129 Case 1:09-cv-02030-CKK Document 48-3 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 129 Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2 - - - 3 COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC: 4 RELATIONS, : : 5 Plaintiff,

More information

Teresa Plenge Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al July 1, Page 1

Teresa Plenge Selman v. Cobb County School District, et al July 1, Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2 ATLANTA DIVISION 3 JEFFREY MICHAEL SELMAN, Plaintiff, 4 vs. CASE NO. 1:02-CV-2325-CC 5 COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 6 COBB COUNTY BOARD

More information

Case 2:11-cv JCZ-SS Document 79 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:11-cv JCZ-SS Document 79 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:11-cv-00467-JCZ-SS Document 79 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANE DOE, Individually and on behalf of * CIVIL ACTION her minor son, JOHN DOE

More information

May 5, 2009 BRETT BARNES. 7 THE COURT: When you get to the witness. 8 stand, please remain standing. 9 Face the clerk over here and raise your

May 5, 2009 BRETT BARNES. 7 THE COURT: When you get to the witness. 8 stand, please remain standing. 9 Face the clerk over here and raise your May 5, 2009 BRETT BARNES 7 THE COURT: When you get to the witness 8 stand, please remain standing. 9 Face the clerk over here and raise your 10 right hand. 11 12 BRETT CHRISTOPHER BARNES 13 Having been

More information

Page 280. Cleveland, Ohio. 20 Todd L. Persson, Notary Public

Page 280. Cleveland, Ohio. 20 Todd L. Persson, Notary Public Case: 1:12-cv-00797-SJD Doc #: 91-1 Filed: 06/04/14 Page: 1 of 200 PAGEID #: 1805 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 EASTERN DIVISION 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 6 FAIR ELECTIONS

More information

CERTIFIED COPY SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3,

CERTIFIED COPY SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3, 1 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SWORN STATEMENT 12 ROBERTO J. BAYARDO 13 OCTOBER 3, 2011 14 15 16 17 CERTIFIED COPY 18 19 20 Sworn Statement OF ROBERTO J. BAYARDO, given 21 on the 3rd day of October, 2011,

More information

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1246, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order.

UNOFFICIAL/UNAUTHENTICATED TRANSCRIPT. [The R.M.C. 803 session was called to order at 1246, MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. 0 [The R.M.C. 0 session was called to order at, December.] MJ [Col SPATH]: These commissions are called to order. All parties who were present before are again present. Get the witness back up, please.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Vol. - 1 THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION ) FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. :0-CV-00 ) JON HUSTED, in his

More information

Deposition of Philip Hawkins

Deposition of Philip Hawkins 1 1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY 2 OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DISTRICT "C" 3 4 5 CLAIM NO: 263-55-6571 6 EMPLOYEE: PHILIP M. HAWKINS 7 EMPLOYER: ABI CARRIER:

More information

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/14/14 Page 1 of 77

Case 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/14/14 Page 1 of 77 Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 718-5 Filed in TXSD on 11/14/14 Page 1 of 77 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ---------------------------- ) MARC

More information

INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL HULLETT

INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL HULLETT INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL HULLETT DATE TAKEN: FEBRUARY, TIME: : A.M. - : A.M. PLACE: KANEY & OLIVARI, P.L. SETON TRAIL ORMOND BEACH, FLORIDA () -0 APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney & Olivari, P.L.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Docket No. CR ) Plaintiff, ) Chicago, Illinois ) March, 0 v. ) : p.m. ) JOHN DENNIS

More information

SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8:00 P.M., JANUARY 2, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD

SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8:00 P.M., JANUARY 2, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD SUFFIELD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS :00 P.M., JANUARY, PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: GREG AND JENNIFER SPICKARD - - - - - Held at Suffield Township Fire Department Community Room Waterloo Road, Mogadore,

More information

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 2 NASHVILLE DIVISION

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 2 NASHVILLE DIVISION 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 2 NASHVILLE DIVISION 3 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) 5 ) vs. ) Case No.: 3:96-cr-00120 6 ) LARRY TURNLEY, ) 7 ) Defendant. )

More information

Case 3:13-cv TJM-DEP Document 58-3 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 58. Khadijah Smith 3/11/2014

Case 3:13-cv TJM-DEP Document 58-3 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 58. Khadijah Smith 3/11/2014 Case 3:13-cv-00169-TJM-DEP Document 58-3 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE MUSLIMS OF AMERICA INC., -against- Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:13-CV-0169

More information

) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S. 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No ) 3

) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S. 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No ) 3 )0001 1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETI'S 2 SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT (Consolidated CA No. 02-1296) 3 4 JAMES M. HOGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 5 VS. 6 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC 7 ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, a

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/0/0 INDEX NO. /0 NYSCEF DOC. NO. - RECEIVED NYSCEF: 0/0/0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY - CIVIL TERM - PART ----------------------------------------------x

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) 1:09-CV-13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) 1:09-CV-13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.) RIBIK ) ) VS. HCR MANORCARE, INC., et al. ) ) ) :0-CV- ) ) ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA ) OCTOBER,

More information

Cardinal Bernard F. Law - Day 6 10/16/2002

Cardinal Bernard F. Law - Day 6 10/16/2002 \ Pagel 1 OF MASSACHUSETTS 2 COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX 3 GREGORY FORD, et al., Plaintiff, 4 Superior Court vs. Civil Action 5 No. 02-0626 BERNARD CARDINAL LAW, a/k/a, 6 CARDINAL BERNARD F. LAW, Defendants. 7...

More information

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: Filed: 05/11/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2260

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: Filed: 05/11/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2260 Case: 1:10-cv-01168 Document #: 226-1 Filed: 05/11/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2260 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NATHSON E. FIELDS, Plaintiff,

More information

INTERVIEW WITH JOSH FLEMISTER AND CHRISTINA JANUARY 17, 2001

INTERVIEW WITH JOSH FLEMISTER AND CHRISTINA JANUARY 17, 2001 INTERVIEW WITH JOSH FLEMISTER AND CHRISTINA JANUARY 17, 2001 BILL: Josh, I appreciate you coming in. I know we talked the other night and I was gonna try and get with you the other night.... JOSH: Yeah,

More information

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 179 Filed: 05/11/16 Page 1 of 24. One Wisconsin Institute Inc. v. Gerald Nichol et al.

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 179 Filed: 05/11/16 Page 1 of 24. One Wisconsin Institute Inc. v. Gerald Nichol et al. Case: 3:15-cv-0032-jdp Document #: Filed: 05//16 Page 1 of 2 One Wisconsin Institute Inc. v. Gerald Nichol et al. 15CV32BBC Transcript of the Testimony of: Cassandra Silas April, 16 G ',. GRAMANN REPORTING

More information

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 11 REPRESENTATIVE TODD HUNTER 5/22/ (Pages 1 to 4)

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 11 REPRESENTATIVE TODD HUNTER 5/22/ (Pages 1 to 4) Case :-cv-000-olg-jes-xr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of REPRESENTATIVE TODD HUNTER //0 (Pages to IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a Federal agency,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a Federal agency, 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case No. -cv-0-wyd-kmt ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, INC., a Colorado non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DECLARATION OF RON BARDMASS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DECLARATION OF RON BARDMASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEVEN BIERFELDT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.09-cv-01117 ) JANET NAPOLITANO, as Secretary, ) Department of Homeland Security, ) ) Defendant. ) --------------)

More information

2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011

2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 1 1 CASE NUMBER: BC384285 2 CASE NAME: PRECISION DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS. 3 YURI PLYAM, ET AL. 4 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 5 DEPARTMENT 17 HON. RICHARD E. RICO, JUDGE 6 REPORTER: SYLVIA

More information

Case 3:14-mj Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. for the District of Oregon ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.

Case 3:14-mj Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. for the District of Oregon ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Case 3:14-mj-00038 Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1 AO 91 (Rev. 11/11 Criminal Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of Oregon FILEDii t'\'4r '14 11:01 USDNJRP United

More information

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

n.. '...,en IIIIIIIIJend 1 to

n.. '...,en IIIIIIIIJend 1 to 0/0/0 0: DISPONZIO PAGE 0/0,"00/0l Order DIlIl!d 0)//0Q, BY JUDGE. franalls A. RIYEllA. (Pge Of SDO) PRESENT: Ben.Ito0COf) BiWtQ.., Saslte At." I~. Trl TfltIDt P'I'f!?~ tbt SuprmJr Court ofthe SbltIl ornew

More information

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION 3 TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al., : CASE NO. Plaintiffs : 4:04-CV-02688 4 vs. : DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT, : Harrisburg,

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : vs. : : TIMOTHY Da'SHAUN TAYLOR : : CR 0 Detention Hearing in the above matter held

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE. ) Case No.: 3:17-CR-82. Defendant. )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE. ) Case No.: 3:17-CR-82. Defendant. ) IN THE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF, ) ) Defendant. ) ) APPEARANCES: ) Case No.: :-CR- ) PROCEEDINGS BEFORE

More information

INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL KIEPERT. PLACE: VOLUSIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 123 WEST INDIANA BOULEVARD DeLAND, FLORIDA 32720

INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL KIEPERT. PLACE: VOLUSIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 123 WEST INDIANA BOULEVARD DeLAND, FLORIDA 32720 INTERVIEW OF: MICHAEL KIEPERT DATE TAKEN: MARCH, TIME: : A.M. - : A.M. PLACE: VOLUSIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WEST INDIANA BOULEVARD DeLAND, FLORIDA APPEARANCES: JONATHAN KANEY, ESQUIRE Kaney &

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Stephen G. Montoya (#01) MONTOYA JIMENEZ, P.A. The Great American Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Ste. 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 (0) - (fax) - sgmlegal@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Press Conference Announcing Recusal from Investigation into Russian Influence in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign

Press Conference Announcing Recusal from Investigation into Russian Influence in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign Jeff Sessions Press Conference Announcing Recusal from Investigation into Russian Influence in the U.S. Presidential Election Campaign delivered 2 March 2017, DOJ Conference Center, Washington, D.C. [AUTHENTICITY

More information