IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document May :20: KA COA Pages: 22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT BUFFORD APPELLANT VS. NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: SCOTT STUART SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSISSIPPI BAR NO OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS TELEPHONE: (601)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ARGUMENT PROPOSITION ONE. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY ADMITTING OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS MADE BY THE VICTIM, DAVIE MILLER PROPOSITION TWO. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED WHEN IT EXCLUDED EVIDENCE WHICH BUFFORD CLAIMS SUPPORTED HIS THEORY OF THE CASE PROPOSITION THREE. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED WHEN IT ADMITTED DR. ERIN BARNHART S TESTIMONY ABOUT THE FINDINGS FROM DAVIE MILLER S AUTOPSY CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i

3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Federal Cases Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S.Ct (2011) Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) Davis, 547 U.S., at 822, 126 S.Ct , 7 Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S., at, n. 6, 129 S.Ct., at 2537, n , 15 Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct (2011) , 7, 8, 9, 10 State Cases Bishop v. State, 771 So.2d 397, 401, ( 18) (Miss.App.2000) Collins v. State, 513 So.2d 877 (Miss.1987) , 11 Grim v. State, 102 So.3d 1073 (Miss.2012) , 15 Hemingway v. State, 483 So.2d 1335 (Miss.1986) Lester v. State, 692 So.2d 755 (Miss.1997) Pace v. State, 473 So.2d 167 (Miss.1985) Pham v. State, 716 So.2d 1100, 1102, ( 12) (Miss.1998) , 11 Ragin v. State, 724 So.2d 901 (Miss.1998) Smith v. State, 733 So.2d 793 (Miss.1999) Woods v. State, 393 So.2d 1319 (Miss.1981) , 11 State Court Rules M..R.E., Rule Miss. R. Evid. 103(a) ii

4 M.R.E., Rule , 11 iii

5 STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is a direct appeal from convictions in Hinds County Circuit Court, First Judicial District for deliberate design murder and felon in possession of a firearm. Robert Bufford brings this appeal. The Circuit Court of Hinds County, Honorable Jeff Weill presiding, sentenced Bufford to a term of life for the murder and a term of ten years for being a felon in possession of a firearm. COURSE AND DISPOSITION OF THE CASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT The Grand Jury in Hinds County returned a true bill charging Robert Bufford with deliberate design murder of Davie Miller in Count One and with being a felon in possession of a deadly weapon in Count Two. C.P The Court tried Bufford before a jury. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on both counts. C.P The Court sentenced Robert Bufford to serve a term of life in Count One for the murder, C.P. 196, and a term of ten years for Count Two, possession of a deadly weapon by a convicted felon, to run consecutive to the life sentence for murder, C.P Robert Bufford filed a notice of appeal. C.P STATEMENT OF THE FACTS On July 5, 2011 Robert Bufford and Davie Miller left a club named Northside Legends in the city of Jackson, County of Hinds, and in the State of Mississippi. Davie Miller was driving, and Robert Bufford was in the passenger seat. Tr Robert Bufford was also known as Rod or Little Rob. Tr. 516, 524, 533. Carlos Smith saw Davie Miller and Bufford leave the club. Smith told law enforcement that they left the club at about 4:40 A.M. Tr

6 Officer Ahvegail White heard shooting and responded. She found Davie Miller lying down on the ground on his back. He was drenched in blood. Davie Miller told Officer White that he had been shot. He told her that he and a friend left Northside Legends. Miller said he was driving to his friend s grandmother s house where the friend was staying. Miller said they got into an argument, and his friend began to shoot. Tr Miller identified the friend who shot him as Rod or Roderick. Tr Larry Smith, a paramedic, came to the scene and found Davie Miller. Tr Davie Miller gave Smith information about what happened to Miller. Miller told Smith that he was assaulted by a friend. Miller told Smith that they were coming from a nightclub. Tr Miller had multiple gunshot wounds to his left shoulder, left upper arm, his pelvis, right leg, and to the lower back Smith said that Davie Miller s wounds were possibly life threatening. Tr 384. Davie Miller was transported to UMC on July 5, Tr He was unconscious in the Intensive Care Unit ICU from July 5, 2011 until July 10, Tr Lee Ann Miller was Davie Miller s wife. The first time she was able to speak to Davie Miller after he was shot was on July 10, 2011, when he first regained consciousness.. She asked him if he knew what happened to him. Davie Miller replied, Rod. Tr Davie Miller told his wife, Lee Ann Miller, that he felt like he was not going to make it. He asked her to keep his kids grounded in church to try to get on with life every day. He said this to Lee Ann Miller numerous times while he was in UMC. Davie Miller told Lee Ann Miller that he thought he was going to die three or four times. Tr Davie Miller died on August 3, Tr He died as a result of his gunshot wounds. Tr. 595, and

7 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT PROPOSITION ONE. Robert Bufford claims that the court erred when it admitted statements made by Davie Miller to Miller s wife, the police officer who was the first to arrive on the scene, and the paramedic who responded, gave immediate care to Davie Miller and then had him transported to the hospital. The police officer and the paramendic were responding to an emergency and asked the questions for purpose of responding to the emergency, not to gather evidence for trial. Davie Miller s wife was asking Davie Miller a question when he first regained consciousness. He had been unconscious for five days, and she asked him if he knew what happened to him. She did not ask the question to gather evidence for trial. PROPOSITION TWO. Robert Bufford claims the court erred when it excluded evidence that marijuana was found in the car. He argues it was part of his theory that Davie Miller was killed in a drug deal gone bad. There was no evidence that there was any marijuana found in Davie Miller s car. There was evidence that a bag was found in Miller s car which contained some substance. The substance in the bag was never tested to determine if it was marijuana. The evidence was not relevant under M.R.E., Rule 401. PROPOSITION THREE. Bufford claims the trial court violated Bufford s right to confront witnesses against him when it admitted evidence of the autopsy. Despite having the opportunity to cross-examine the witness who wrote and signed the report, Dr. Barnhart, Bufford argues that the cross-examination 3

8 was meaningless because he was unable to cross-examine the witness who wrote the autopsy notes. Both the United States Supreme Court and the Mississippi Supreme Court have held that a defendant s right to confront witnesses against him is not violated if the defendant has the opportunity to cross-examine the author of the report. Bufford had that opportunity when he cross-examined Dr. Barnhart. ARGUMENT PROPOSITION ONE. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY ADMITTING OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS MADE BY THE VICTIM, DAVIE MILLER Robert Bufford claims that the trial court erred when it admitted in evidence statements made by Davie Miller to his wife, the paramedic who arrived first after Miller s condition was reported, and law enforcement. He claims that Davie Miller s statements were all hearsay and violated the Confrontation Clause. Davie Miller died less than a month after he was shot as a result of his gunshot wounds. Because of his death, Miller was not able to testify at Robert Bufford s trial. The short answer is that both Officer White and Larry Smith, the paramedic, were responding to an emergency when they questioned Davie Miller. Davie Miller was lying on the ground and was covered in blood. Officer White did not know whether the shooter was nearby or would return soon with his gun. If the shooter was still nearby and would begin shooting again, he would pose a danger to Davie Miller, Officer White herself, or to the public. Larry 4

9 Smith was preparing to give medical aid. Smith needed to know what happened to Davie Miller in order to determine the nature and extent of Miller s injuries. Smith, too, was facing an ongoing emergency. Miller s injuries were possibly life-threatening. Smith needed to do a rapid assessment and get Miller to a hospital as quickly as possible. They turned on the lights and sirens when transporting Miller to the hospital. Tr th Lee Ann Miller did not speak to her husband after he was shot until July 10. Before that date Davie Miller was sedated, on a ventilator, and non-responsive in ICU. Lee Ann Miller spoke to her husband. She wanted to know what happened to him, and she asked him, Do you know what happened to you? Davie Miller responded, Rod. Tr Lee Ann Miller was not attempting to gain evidence for a trial. She just wanted to know what happened to her husband. Robert Bufford is making the Confrontation Clause argument for the first time on appeal. At trial he filed and argued a motion in limine, but he based his argument solely on the rule against hearsay. He is only now making the Confrontation Claause argument for the first time on appeal. Bufford waived his Confrontation Clause claim. [O]bjection on one ground at trial waives all other grounds for objection on appeal. Lester v. State, 692 So.2d 755, 772 (Miss.1997). The State does not waive the procedural bar, but the State does address the merits. Testimonial statements of witnesses absent from trial [can be] admitted only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59 (2004). Statements... are testimonial when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no such ongoing emergency, and that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or 5

10 prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution. Davis, 547 U.S., at 822, 126 S.Ct Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1155 (2011). The existence of an emergency or the parties' perception that an emergency is ongoing is among the most important circumstances that courts must take into account in determining whether an interrogation is testimonial because statements made to assist police in addressing an ongoing emergency presumably lack the testimonial purpose that would subject them to the requirement of confrontation. Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, (2011). When the primary purpose of an interrogation is to respond to an ongoing emergency, its purpose is not to create a record for trial and thus is not within the scope of the Clause. Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1155 (2011). An emergency does not last only for the time between when the assailant pulls the trigger and the bullet hits the victim. Michigan v. Bryant, Id., at When determining whether the Confrontation Clause bars the admission of a statement at trial, the court should determine the primary purpose of the interrogation by objectively evaluating the statements and actions of the parties to the encounter, in light of the circumstances in which the interrogation occurs. Michigan v. Bryant, Id., at Bufford s Motion in Limine to Exclude Hearsay from Lee Ann Miller, Larry Smith, and Officer White: Defense counsel filed a motion in limine on the basis of hearsay. He asked to exclude the testimony of the victim s wife, the paramedic who treated Davie miller at the scene, and the police officer who arrived on the scene. Tr

11 Testimony by Lee Ann Miller: Davie Miller was shot and transported to UMC on July 5, Tr Miller was unconscious in ICU from July 5, 2011 until July 10, Tr Lee Ann Miller was Davie Miller s wife. The first time she was able to speak to Davie Miller after he was shot was on July 10, 2011, when he first regained consciousness.. She asked him if he knew what happened to him. Davie Miller replied, Rod. Tr Davie Miller told his wife, Lee Ann Miller, that he felt like he was not going to make it. He asked her to keep his kids grounded in church to try to get on with life every day. He said this to Lee Ann Miller numerous times while he was in UMC. Davie Miller told Lee Ann Miller three or four times that he thought he was going to die. Tr Davie Miller died on August 3, Tr The record does not support a finding that Davie Miller s wife asked the question for the primary purpose of establishing or proving... past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution. Davis, 547 U.S., at 822, 126 S.Ct Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1155 (2011). There was no Confrontation Clause issue involved when Davie Miller s wife asked him if he knew what happened. Testimony by Larry Smith: Larry Smith was a paramedic working for American Medical Response, aka AMR, on July 5, Tr On July 5, 2011 Smith responded to a dispatch to the scene of a shooting. Tr The call about the shooting came to AMR at 5:40 A.M. 7

12 Tr Larry Smith reached Davie Miller at 5:48 A.M. Tr Davie Miller gave Smith information about what happened to Miller. Miller told Smith that he was assaulted by a friend. Miller told Smith that they were coming from a nightclub. Tr Miller had multiple gunshot wounds to his left shoulder, left upper arm, his pelvis, right leg, and to the lower back Smith said that Davie Miller s wounds were possibly life threatening. Tr 384. On cross-examination, Davie Miller told Smith that he was shot with a.45. Tr Larry Smith s job as a paramedic was to go the scene of an emergency and to render medical assistance to a victim before the victim was transported to a hospital or other medical facility. Smith s questions to Davie Miller were asked for the purpose of evaluating Miller s condition to determine what needed to be done depending upon Miller s injuries. This is outside the scope of the Confrontation Clause. When the primary purpose of an interrogation is to respond to an ongoing emergency, its purpose is not to create a record for trial and thus is not within the scope of the Clause. Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1155 (2011). Testimony of Officer Ahvegail White: Officer Ahvegail White responded to the shooting. She found Davie Miller lying down on the ground on his back. He was drenched in blood. White asked Miller what happened. Davie Miller said he had been shot. He told her that he and a friend left Northside Legends. Miller said he was driving to his friend s grandmother s house where the friend was staying. Miller said they got into an argument, and his friend began to shoot. Tr On cross-examination, White testified that when Davie Miller was asked for the identity 8

13 of the person, he responded Rod or Roderick. Tr When the primary purpose of an interrogation is to respond to an ongoing emergency, its purpose is not to create a record for trial and thus is not within the scope of the Clause. Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1155 (2011). Officer White responded to the sound of gunshots and a dispatch request early in the morning. She found a man lying on the ground covered in blood. This was an ongoing emergency. Officer White had heard the shots and had seen Davie Miller lying on the ground covered in blood.. She did not know if the shooter were still close by and might still be a danger to Miller, to her as a police officer, or to the public. The existence of an emergency or the parties' perception that an emergency is ongoing is among the most important circumstances that courts must take into account in determining whether an interrogation is testimonial because statements made to assist police in addressing an ongoing emergency presumably lack the testimonial purpose that would subject them to the requirement of confrontation. As the context of this case brings into sharp relief, the existence and duration of an emergency depend on the type and scope of danger posed to the victim, the police, and the public. Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 131 S.Ct. 1143, 1162 (2011). An emergency does not last only for the time between when the assailant pulls the trigger and the bullet hits the victim. Michigan v. Bryant, Id., at The emergency was ongoing when Officer White asked Davie Miller who shot him. Knowing the identity of the shooter assisted Officer White in knowing who to look for if other people appeared nearby where Davie Miller was lying on the ground. Officer White could have been in danger as would other members of the public appeared and were close enough to be shot. The questions asked by Officer White, Larry Smith, and Lee Ann Miller were not within 9

14 the Confrontation Clause. Robert Bufford s Constitutional rights were not violated. PROPOSITION TWO. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED WHEN IT EXCLUDED EVIDENCE WHICH BUFFORD CLAIMS SUPPORTED HIS THEORY OF THE CASE. Bufford claims the trial court erred when it excluded evidence that marijuana was found in Davie Miller s car. Bufford claims this was evidence which supported a finding that Davie Miller was shot during a drug deal gone bad. He argues that was his theory of the case, the Court excluded the evidence, and the exclusion was error. There was no evidence that the substance was marijuana. Robert Bufkin of the City of Jackson Police Department testified that he performed an inventory of the 2004 Caillac which Miller was driving. Bufkin found a bag in the center console of the car. Bufkin suspected the bag contained marijuana. The substance was not tested to determine if it was marijuana. Tr Evidence may be introduced as part of the res gestae of a crime if it was an inseparable part of the entire transaction. Woods v. State, 393 So.2d 1319, 1324 (Miss.1981). Collins v. State, 513 So.2d 877, (Miss.1987). The admission of res gestae evidence is largely left to the sound discretion of the trial judge. Hemingway v. State, 483 So.2d 1335, 1337 (Miss.1986). Collins v. State, 513 So.2d 877, (Miss.1987). [F]or a case to be reversed on the admission or exclusion of evidence, it must result in prejudice and harm or adversely affect a substantial right of a party. Pham v. State, 716 So.2d 1100, 1102, ( 12) (Miss.1998). Miss. R. Evid. 103(a). 10

15 According to M.R..E., Rule 401, for evidence to be relevant, it must have a "tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence." Miss.R.Evid Ragin v. State, 724 So.2d 901, (Miss.1998) The scope of cross-examination is ordinarily broad; however, it is within the sound discretion of the trial court to limit cross-examination to relevant matters. Pace v. State, 473 So.2d 167, 169 (Miss.1985). Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. Smith v. State, 733 So.2d 793, 801 (Miss.1999). Bishop v. State, 771 So.2d 397, 401, ( 18) (Miss.App.2000). The nature and identity of the substance in the bag was unknown. Robert Bufkin suspected it to be marijuana, but it was never tested. R Robert Bufford, the defendant, did not seek to have the substance in the bag examined or tested to determine what it contained. Nor did Bufford or anyone else seek to have the bag itself dusted in order to determine whose finger prints, if any were found, were on the bag. Bufford did not make a sufficient showing that the evidence was relevant. There was no evidence that there was a drug sale that resulted in violence. The Court conducted a hearing outside the presence of the jury. The hearing included a proffer of Investigator Bufkin s testimony. Investigator Bufkin testified that he was with the crime scene unit of the Jackson Police Department. Bufkin said he examined Davie Miller s car. Bufkin said he found a bag which contained a substance which was suspected to be marijuana. The bag and the substance contained therein were marked as Exhibit for identification only No. 7. Bufkin said he was not aware that the substance inside the bag was ever tested. Tr

16 Bufkin testified that he took a photograph of the interior of Davie Miller s car. The photograph included a view of the console between the driver s seat and the passenger s seat. What appears to be a bag tied in a knot is seen resting on top of the console. The photograph was marked Exhibit 9 for identification only. Tr The State argued that the substance was never tested and was not proved to be marijuana. It lacked relevance and was prejudicial. Bufford argued that it was his theory of the case that... this marijuana possibly has something to do with the motive for which the victim was shot. He argued that... or we could come to the conclusion that there was a possible drug deal that just occurred. Tr The Court found that the car was owned by someone other than Davie Miller, and the substance in the bag was never proven to be marijuana. The Judge concluded that the evidence was not relevant. The court sustained the State s motion in limine to exclude any testimony about marijuana. Tr Robert Bufford said in his opening that the evidence would show that he was not the one who shot Davie Miller, and he... was not in the vicinity of where Mr. Miller was killed on Martin Luther King Drive. Tr Bufford does not mention a drug deal gone bad during opening statement. The bullet which penetrated Davie Miller s driver s side front window was fired from inside Davie Miller s car. Tr In his closing Robert Bufford argued that the evidence was inconsistent and did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bufford shot and killed Davie Miller. He does not mention someone else killing Davie Miller during the sale or purchase of illegal drugs. Neither Bufford s opening statement nor his closing argument support a finding that 12

17 Robert Bufford s theory of the case was that Davie Miller was shot while he was attempting to buy or sell marijuana. There was no evidence supporting a theory of a drug deal gone bad. There was no evidence that marijuana was found in Davie Miller s car. If Bufford had asked to admit the bag found in the car, and the court admitted the bag, there was still no proof that the bag contained marijuana. Bufford never authenticated the contents of the bag which was resting on the console. The substance inside the bag was never tested. To conclude that the substance was marijuana would be mere speculation. There was no scientific evidence that identified the nature of the substance. The substance in the bag was not identified. Here, the issues could have been confused or the jury misled because the there was no authenticated evidence that the contents of the bag was marijuana. It was mere speculation, first, to believe the substance was marijuana, and, second, to believe that there was a drug deal gone bad. In the absence of any evidence supporting a finding of drug deal gone bad, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he excluded the evidence. PROPOSITION THREE. WHETHER THE COURT ERRED WHEN IT ADMITTED DR. ERIN BARNHART S TESTIMONY ABOUT THE FINDINGS FROM DAVIE MILLER S AUTOPSY. 13

18 Bufford claims the court erred when it allowed Dr. Barhart to testify because she did not perform or witness the autopsy, despite the fact that she authored the report. The Doctor who performed the autopsy had left the medical examiner s office. Bufford moved to suppress the evidence of the autopsy report. He argued that Dr. Shaker performed the autopsy but failed to complete the autopsy report. He argued that Dr. Erin Barnhart completed the report. She was the Deputy Medical Examiner. Tr Bufford said that since Dr. Barnhart s participation was strictly preparing the report, that it would deny Bufford s rights under the confrontation clause and the holding in Bullcoming. Tr This issue is controlled by Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S.Ct. 2705, 2716 (2011), and Grim v. State, 102 So.3d 1073, 22 (Miss.2012). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Mississippi Supreme Court say that the right of the defendant is to cross-examine the analyst who wrote the report or actively participated in the production of the report and... had intimate knowledge of analyses even though [he or] she did not perform the tests first hand. The cases also say that the analyst who wrote the report will be allowed to testify if the defendant then has the opportunity to cross-examine the anayst. The United States Supreme Court said in Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 131 S.Ct. 2705, 2716 (2011), as follows: Accordingly, the analysts who write reports that the prosecution introduces must be made available for confrontation even if they possess the scientific acumen of Mme. Curie and the veracity of Mother Teresa. Melendez-Diaz Melendez Diaz, 557 U.S., at, n. 6, 129 S.Ct., at 2537, n. 6. On that same issue the Mississippi Supreme Court said in Grim v. State, 102 So.3d 1073, 14

19 22 (Miss.2012)., as follows: We hold that a supervisor, reviewer, or other analyst involved may testify in place of the primary analyst where that person was actively involved in the production of the report and had intimate knowledge of analyses even though [he or] she did not perform the tests first hand. Dr. Barnhart testified that she examined Dr. Shaker s notes which he took at the autopsy. She testified that she also reviewed the photographs which were taken at the time of the autopsy. Dr. Barnhart testified that she compiled the contents. She then wrote and signed the autopsy report. Dr. Barnhart testified that she based her opinion on her review of Dr. Shaker s notes and her examination of the photographs taken at the autopsy. Tr Dr. Barnhart and her report both met the requirements for admission into evidence found in Bullcoming and Grim. The autopsy report was both written and signed by Dr. Barnhart. She expressed the opinions which were found in both the report of the autopsy and her trial testimony. Dr. Barnhart was available for cross-examination by Robert Bufford. Counsel for Bufford cross-examined Dr. Barnhart. Dr. Barnhart testified that Davie Miller died as a result of gunshot wounds. Counsel for Robert Bufford was then allowed to cross-examine Dr. Barnhart. Bufford had the opportunity to ask Dr. Barnhart what facts she discovered in the photographs and Dr. Shaker s notes which she used as a basis for her opinion that Davie Miller s death was caused by gunshot wounds. Robert Bufford s right under the Confrontation Clause is to cross-examine the witnesses who give evidence against him. The goal is to allow the defendant to test the evidence in the crucible of cross-examination. The State responded that Dr. Barnhart s testimony was admissible under M..R.E., Rule 15

20 703, which allows an expert to give their opinion based upon the data of other experts rather than by personal observation. Tr The court denied the motion to suppress the autopsy. Tr At trial, Bufford moved to strike Dr. Barnhart s testimony. Tr The court found that it was appropriate for Dr. Barnhart to give her independent opinion. The Court denied Bufford s motion Tr

21 CONCLUSION The State asks the court to affirm the judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court of Hinds County, First Judicial District. Respectfully submitted, JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: s/ Scott Stuart SCOTT STUART SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSISSIPPI BAR NO OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS TELEPHONE: (601)

22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this day I electronically filed the foregoing pleading or other paper with the Clerk of the Court using the MEC system which sent notification of such filing to the following: Further, I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the following non-mec participants: Honorable Jeff Weill, Sr. Circuit Court Judge Post Office Box Jackson, Mississippi Honorable Robert Shuler Smith District Attorney Post Office Box Jackson, Mississippi W. Daniel Hinchcliff, Esquire Attorney At Law MS Office of the State Public Defender Indigent Appeals Division Post Office Box 3510 Jackson, Mississippi This the 15th day of May, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI TELEPHONE: (601) s/ Scott Stuart SCOTT STUART SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 18

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Apr 4 2014 14:46:44 2012-KA-01839-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2012-KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 1 2018 16:12:56 2017-KA-01170-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODNEY WAYNE SMITH APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-01170 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0800-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 25 2015 17:45:18 2013-KA-01888-SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01888 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

FILED AUG Q APPELLANT RODERICK G. FORIEST NO KA-2025 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

FILED AUG Q APPELLANT RODERICK G. FORIEST NO KA-2025 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TIlE STATE OF MlS~gp" RODERICK G. FORIEST VS. FILED AUG Q 72008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COUR{ COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2007-KA-2025 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

FILED AUG IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPCO py APPELLANT MICHAEL BENARD MILLER NO.2007-KA-1994 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

FILED AUG IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPCO py APPELLANT MICHAEL BENARD MILLER NO.2007-KA-1994 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPCO py MICHAEL BENARD MILLER VS. FILED AUG 21. 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO.2007-KA-1994 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F ) Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jan 3 2018 10:51:06 2017-KA-01030-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HENRY EARL HARVEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2017-KA-01030-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 9 2017 14:57:35 2016-KA-01406-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-01406 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 10-936 CLEVELAND EVANS, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLANT, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered February 3, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CR 2008-5049, HON.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487 [Cite as State v. Moore, 2008-Ohio-2577.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2007 CA 40 v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487 MICHAEL MOORE : (Criminal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY MCINNIS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-1576 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY

More information

Decided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder

Decided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 6, 2017 HUNSTEIN, Justice. S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder and related offenses in

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued May 26, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00680-CR JOSE SORTO JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court

More information

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DONALD DALE SMITH, JR., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-AP-00006-A-O Lower Court Case: 2014-MM-012298-A-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

More information

STATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH

STATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH [Cite as State v. Smith, 2010-Ohio-4006.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93593 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERIC SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

E-Filed Document May :58: KA COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

E-Filed Document May :58: KA COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. E-Filed Document May 24 2017 13:58:45 2016-KA-01723-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-01723-COA QUENDARIUS BERJUAN ROBINSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * Judgment rendered November 20, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C.Cr.P. No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE

More information

STATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE

STATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE [Cite as State v. Monroe, 2009-Ohio-4994.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92291 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. DARREN MONROE

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-349 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES GREGORY ANDRUS, AKA ROBERT CHARLES ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES GEORGE ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-1326 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH SAVOY ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 08-K-5271-B

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 EDDIE MCHOLDER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D04-3957 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed January 13, 2006 Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DON SIDDALL Appeal from the Hamilton County Criminal Court No. 267654 Don W. Poole, Judge

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 1622-CR02213 ) vs. ) ) JASON STOCKLEY, ) ) Defendant. ) FINAL ARGUMENT: THE MAGIC BULLET,

More information

No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Motions to suppress are intended to exclude evidence obtained

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL D. LEGGETT APPELLANT VS. NO.2009-KA-I713-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

STATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH

STATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH [Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-6954.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90996 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONTA SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. McMichael, 2012-Ohio-1343.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 96970 and 96971 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TREA

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 TAYLOR, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006 ANDRE LEON LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D05-1958 [ June 21, 2006 ] Andre Lewis appeals

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 5, 2005 v No. 252308 Wayne Circuit Court ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON, LC No. 03-007705-01 Defendant-Appellant.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District Court;

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CACR09-80 JEFFREY PAUL GOLDEN V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLANT APPELLEE Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, [NO.

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 STEVENSON, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010 MICHAEL A. WOLFE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D07-4555 [May 12, 2010] A jury convicted

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MOSLEY Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL NO. C-150627 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-25900 JUDGMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA COA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA COA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Sep 23 2014 22:49:47 2013-KM-02085-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-KA-02085-COA PAXTON AUSTIN APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 JOHN EDWARD DAVIS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D05-2173 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed March 10, 2006 Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2009

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2009 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2009 PATRICK HARRIS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-01420 John P.

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0999 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KENAN ALLEN FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0999 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KENAN ALLEN FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS KENAN ALLEN * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-KA-0999 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 497-322, SECTION J

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NICHOLAS ALLEN MONTIETH Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County 07-01-0431

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert Hanson,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert Hanson, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 6-892 / 05-0481 Filed November 15, 2007 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ROBERT MONROE JORDAN JR., Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court

More information

Center on Wrongful Convictions

Center on Wrongful Convictions CASE SUMMARY CATEGORY: DEFENDANT S NAME: JURISDICTION: RESEARCHED BY: Exoneration Steve Smith Cook County, Illinois Rob Warden Center on Wrongful Convictions DATE LAST REVISED: September 24, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the

STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 77 Docket: Oxf-07-645 Argued: April 8, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, and MEAD,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-2561.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. :

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEL YNN DELSHAE PITTMAN

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEL YNN DELSHAE PITTMAN IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEL YNN DELSHAE PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO.2009-KA-0929 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

NO KA-1557 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EARL PAYNE, JR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

NO KA-1557 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EARL PAYNE, JR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS EARL PAYNE, JR. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2008-KA-1557 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 475-290, SECTION

More information

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk NO. 1543812; 1543813 Filed18March06A9:00 ChrisDaniel-DistrictClerk HarrisCounty EA001_17192 By:LGODLEY STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 263 rd DISTRICT COURT v. Leon Jacob HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF INTENTION

More information

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 Case 112-cv-08170-RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL HARRIS AND EDDIE HARRIS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID SMITH, II, Appellant, v. Case No.

More information

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC Filing # 60657585 E-Filed 08/21/2017 11:11:20 AM In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC17-1536 MARK JAMES ASAY, Petitioner, v. RECEIVED, 08/21/2017 11:13:30 AM, Clerk, Supreme Court JULIE L. JONES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY [Cite as State v. Smith, 2011-Ohio-965.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 09CA16 : vs. : Released: February 24, 2011

More information

Alabama. # Concealed Handgun Permit Holder: Tykee Smith PENDING. Date: August 2, People Killed: 1

Alabama. # Concealed Handgun Permit Holder: Tykee Smith PENDING. Date: August 2, People Killed: 1 # Concealed Handgun Permit Holder: Tykee Smith PENDING Date: August 2, 2014 Circumstances: On August 2, 2014, concealed handgun permit holder Tykee Smith, 19, allegedly shot and killed Charles David Thomas,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : JUSTIN JAMES ROZNOWSKI, : : Appellant : No. 1857 WDA

More information

JANUARY 22, 2014 STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0397 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EDWARD AUGUSTINE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

JANUARY 22, 2014 STATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0397 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EDWARD AUGUSTINE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS EDWARD AUGUSTINE * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-KA-0397 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 504-596, SECTION

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 115,609 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY STEPHEN NICHOLS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Riley

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI. v. ) No. 16CR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI. v. ) No. 16CR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 16CR03006321 ) KEITH CARNES, ) ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL BASED UPON NEWLY DISCOVERED

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Oct 7 2014 13:06:15 2014-CA-00332 Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00332 JEAN MESSER CATALONATTO AND

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC J.B.PARKER, Appellant, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC J.B.PARKER, Appellant, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC01-172 J.B.PARKER, Appellant, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARTIN

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 17-058838 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095440950 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) PATRICK L. BARKWELL ) 11409 E. Anderson, ) Sugar

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY APPELLEES SECOND MOTION AND BRIEF FOR RECONSIDERATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY APPELLEES SECOND MOTION AND BRIEF FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY PAM HICKS and JOHN MARK BYERS APPELLANTS v. CV-2012-290-6 THE CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARKANSAS, and SCOTT ELLINGTON, in his Official Capacities as Prosecuting Attorney

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CAMERON WINSELLE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 04-05193

More information

The following materials are the product of or adapted from Marvin Ventrell and the Juvenile Law Society with permission. All rights reserved.

The following materials are the product of or adapted from Marvin Ventrell and the Juvenile Law Society with permission. All rights reserved. The following materials are the product of or adapted from Marvin Ventrell and the Juvenile Law Society with permission. All rights reserved. Trial Skills for Dependency Court? Its not just for TV Lawyers

More information

MODIFIED 08/30/2016 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

MODIFIED 08/30/2016 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MODIFIED 08/30/2016 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, v. LONNY LEROY MAYS, Respondent, Appellant. WD78417 OPINION FILED: July 26, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court of

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,123 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,123 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,123 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RASHAUDE ALI WOODLEY, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2018. Affirmed. Appeal from Johnson

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC07-1167 HERMAN LINDSEY, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [July 9, 2009] Herman Lindsey appeals from a conviction of first-degree murder and a sentence

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES,

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2006 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Case No. 5D04-2706 CORRECTED MICHAEL THOMAS RAINES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-0-2027-JF ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) San Jose, CA 6 vs. ) October 2, 200 ) 7 ROGER VER, ) ) 8

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHO USE RESIDENT JUDGE ONE THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 James D. Nutter, Esquire 11 South Race Street Georgetown,

More information

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALEX CARLOS BAEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2905 )

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Bland, 2015-Ohio-2388.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101631 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CLAUDIUS W. BLAND

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 11, 2003 v No. 234749 Berrien Circuit Court ROBERT LEE THOMAS, LC No. 2000-402258-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L. STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-495 / 09-1500 Filed October 6, 2010 KENNETH LEE MADSEN, a/k/a KENNETH LEE DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the

More information

No. 48,126-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

No. 48,126-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * Judgment rendered June 26, 2013 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La.-CCP. No. 48,126-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA JOHNNY LLOYD SMITH,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 NO. 95-181 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Flathead, The Honorable Ted 0. Lympus, Judge presiding.

More information

COX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# DOB: 10/06/59

COX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# DOB: 10/06/59 COX, Robert Craig (W/M) DC# 113377 DOB: 10/06/59 Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Case # CR88-364 Sentencing Judge: The Honorable Richard F. Conrad Trial Attorneys: Patricia Cashman & Kelly Sims,

More information

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 78,460 STEVEN EDWARD STEIN, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 13, 19941 PER CURIAM. Steven Edward Stein appeals his convictions of two counts of first-degree murder and one count

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,712 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SAWAN DILIP PATIDAR, Appellant.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,712 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SAWAN DILIP PATIDAR, Appellant. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,712 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SAWAN DILIP PATIDAR, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Dickinson

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 2, 2003 v No. 239329; 239330 Wayne Circuit Court MANZELL C. SAMPSON, LC No. 01-001208; 01-000390

More information

David Dionne v. State of Florida

David Dionne v. State of Florida The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

Marshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida

Marshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2014 v No. 315267 Grand Traverse Circuit Court STEVEN RICHARD, LC No. 13-011510-FH Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Qualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible Evidence About Alternative Murder Suspects

Qualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible Evidence About Alternative Murder Suspects Civil Rights Update David A. Perkins and Melissa N. Schoenbein Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Qualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible

More information

Anticipatory Guide. Explanation. Statement. I Agree. Disagree

Anticipatory Guide. Explanation. Statement. I Agree. Disagree Name: Current Unit Anticipatory Guide Date: Team: Read each statement to yourself and place a checkmark next to your answer ( I Agree or I Disagree ). Provide an explanation for your response. You will

More information

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed.

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed. ACKER v. STATE Cite as 787 So.2d 77 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 2001) Fla. 77 Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.,

More information

THOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:

THOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK: Michael Goodwin, creator of the sport of Supercross, was convicted in 2007 of ordering the murders of Mickey Thompson, 1960 s- 70 s Indy and off road racing legend, and his wife Trudy in 1988. Goodwin

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : : NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRANCE SMITH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3382 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of

More information

MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16-2013-CF-005781-AXXX-MA DIVISION: CR-D STATE OF FLORIDA vs. DONALD SMITH MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS

More information

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EDNA MAE SANDERS APPELLANT VS. NO.2009-KA-I925-COA ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532 [Cite as State v. Ahmad, 2012-Ohio-3489.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 24563 v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532 SHAFIK AHMAD : (Criminal appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 13, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 13, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 13, 2005 Session TRISTA LARAE DENTON, ET AL. v. CHRISTOPHER LORN PHELPS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 94704 Bill Swann, Judge

More information

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. --- So.3d ----, 2011 WL 3300178 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.) Briefs and Other Related Documents Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE HONORABLE NEIL V. WAKE, JUDGE FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Joseph Rudolph Wood III, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV --PHX-NVW Phoenix, Arizona July, 0 : p.m. 0 BEFORE: THE HONORABLE

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-1076 TERRY SMITH, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 16, 2014] PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from Terry Smith s first-degree murder

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re Estate of JOSEPH G. BERG, JR., Deceased. LUCILLE WOLCOTT and LAWRENCE BERG, Petitioners-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED March 13, 2007 v No. 272255 Bay County Probate Court

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000697 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095451472 OCN: STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CLIFTON L. JACK ) 1404 NE Ivory Lane )

More information

No. 51,498-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

No. 51,498-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * Judgment rendered August 9, 2017. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 992, La. C. Cr. P. No. 51,498-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE

More information

STEPHEN A. HUNTING COUNTY ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY, KANSAS. 301 S. Main Street OTTAWA, KS Telephone (785) Fax (785)

STEPHEN A. HUNTING COUNTY ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY, KANSAS. 301 S. Main Street OTTAWA, KS Telephone (785) Fax (785) STEPHEN A. HUNTING COUNTY ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY, KANSAS 301 S. Main Street OTTAWA, KS. 66067 Telephone (785) 229-8970 Fax (785) 229-8971 For Immediate Release October 14, 2014 County Attorney Stephen

More information

MARION F. EDWARDS CHIEF JUDGE

MARION F. EDWARDS CHIEF JUDGE , r'-,""-,--, 'O>L..,., '",..i, r' t.,;,-( _...: STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DEMOND TANNER a/kja JULIEN BRICE NO. ll-ka-62 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH

More information