Iranian Revolutionaries Hold Americans Hostage, November 4, 1979-January 20, 1981

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Iranian Revolutionaries Hold Americans Hostage, November 4, 1979-January 20, 1981"

Magnus Young
5 years ago
Views:

1 Iranian Revolutionaries Hold Americans Hostage, November 4, 1979-January 20, DISCovering World History. Online Detroit: Gale, Iranian Revolutionaries Hold Americans Hostage, November 4, 1979-January 20, 1981 Table of Contents:Further Readings The Iranian hostage crisis was the direct result of United States support of a regime whose flagrant violation of human rights precipitated the Iranian revolution Principal Personages Jimmy Carter (1924- ), the thirty-ninth president of the United States ( ) Ayatollah Khomeini ( ), an Islamic religious leader who became the chief political figure in Iran in 1979 Reza Shah Pahlavi, Mohammad ( ), the shah of Iran from 1941 to 1980 Cyrus Vance, the U.S. secretary of state ( ) Summary of Event The anti-american sentiment that culminated in the seizure of the United States embassy in Teheran in 1977 had its roots in the 1953 overthrow of popular prime minister Mohammad Mosaddeq. Prior to that time, the United States had been praised by many Iranians as a liberating force that had protected them from the British and the Russians. After 1953, though, Iranians of all political persuasions began to condemn the United States as an oppressive exploiter that had allied itself with the imperialistic interests of Great Britain. The United States' support of the governing regime of Iran, which began with the rescue of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, solidified its reputation as an interventionist power in the eyes of many Iranian citizens. By the 1970's, the anti-american movement had become associated with the antimonarchical movement that had arisen as a response to the shah's oppressive policies. The year 1977 set the stage for the Iranian revolution and the virtual severance of ties between Iran and the United States. First, the Iranian economy, which had experienced a boom between 1973 and 1975, began to plummet. The tremendous gap in the distribution of income between rural and urban people was aggravated by the fact that the peasants could not compete with imports that were being sold at subsidized prices. Because there was a shortage of skilled laborers, workers were imported from the Philippines, Korea, and the United States. In an effort to control spiraling inflation, the shah set up groups of inspectors who prowled through the bazaars looking for price gougers. Because most of the people who were arrested and exiled were the pillars of the traditional business community, the bazaar, which lay at the heart of the Iranian economy, was alienated. Even after the economy began to level off later in the year, the people were no better off because the corruption that had accompanied the boom in the early 1970's was firmly entrenched in the economic system. It is important to note that the people who had instigated the taking of bribes, the fraudulent land schemes, and the exorbitant commissions on 1 of 5 9/18/12 8:15 PM

2 contracts were the shah's family and his close associates. The event that had the greatest impact on Iranian and American relations in 1977 was the revival of Islam. Throughout that year, young men and women in secondary schools, universities, and religious study centers engaged in dialogue concerning social and political matters. Women even began wearing the long black chador as a way of making a political statement. The resurgence of Islam as a powerful political force first became evident on October 9, 1977, when two dozen masked students at Teheran University burned buses and smashed windows to protest the integration of women on campus. During the following weeks, a number of religious demonstrations were held in the holy city of Qum. Iranians appeared to embrace Islam as a refuge from the tyranny of the shah's regime. The year 1977 was also witness to the shah's "liberalization" program, calledmusharikat, which was developed as a response not only to the growing Islamic movement but also to President Jimmy Carter's human rights policy. On January 20, 1977, President Carter said in his inaugural address, "Our moral sense dictates a clear preference for those societies which share with us an abiding respect for individual human rights." Hoping to win continued military and financial support from the United States, the shah instituted the White Revolution, which was a reform program that focused on land reform and literacy. He also invited Amnesty International, the International Red Cross, and the International Commission of Jurists to investigate the social and political conditions in Iran. The volatile situation in Iran was made even more so by Cyrus Vance's visit to Teheran in May, 1977, for the purpose of discussing the sale of 160 F-16 aircraft to Iran. After Vance's return, the United States tried to emphasize the progress that the shah had made in human rights, but most Iranians believed that the shah had improved conditions only a little and that he would regress once he had won favor in President Carter's eyes. The shah's critics pointed to the fact that only one political party, the shah's Rastakhiz party, was permitted in Iran. They also exposed the shah's tendency to categorize his opponents as either communists or reactionary clerics. Both types of opponents, the shah's critics claimed, were branded as "suffering from mental imbalance" and thrown into prison, where they were beaten and tortured. Ironically, the efforts by the shah's police and the military to destroy the opposition in 1978 only served to strengthen it. A secret network of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini's followers, which had been in place ever since his exile in 1964, escalated its operation by distributing millions of dollars to the impoverished masses who were its constituents. On January 8, 1978, an event occurred that united the fragmented opposition forces. Following a verbal attack on Khomeini in the newspaper Ittila'at the day before, clerics and students staged a massive protest march in Qum. The police opened fire, killing two dozen people and wounding many more. Thereafter, antiregime demonstrations became commonplace; at least one was held every month from January, 1978, to February, At the end of the fourteen-month period, an estimated ten to twelve thousand persons were killed and another forty-five to fifty thousand were injured. Anti-American sentiment, which had been growing along with the opposition movement, increased dramatically after the Black Friday massacre on September 8, The shah's soldiers had fired at the crowds in Jalah square, killing and wounding hundreds of unarmed men, women, and children. Two days later, President Carter called the shah and assured him that he still had the support of the United States. This phone call was construed by the Iranian people as an expression of the U.S. president's approval of the Jalah massacre. The Iranians' hostility toward the United States reached its peak when the shah was granted refuge in New York City on October 22, 1979, following the takeover of his country by the Ayatollah Khomeini on February 1. The new era in Iranian-American relations of distrust and violence that was ushered in after the fall of the shah reached tragic proportions in November. On November 1, 1979, two million angry Iranians demonstrated in Teheran, shouting slogans such as "Death to America." On November 4, 2 of 5 9/18/12 8:15 PM

3 1979, a group of nearly five hundred extremist students stormed the U.S. embassy in Teheran and initially took about ninety hostages, most of whom were embassy workers and about sixty of whom were U.S. citizens. The extremists vowed to hold the hostages until the United States returned the shah to Iran to stand trial. For the next 444 days, the fifty-two Americans who remained as hostages (some hostages were released early) were subjected to the same sort of inhumane treatment that the shah had been accused of by the revolutionaries. After being held in the embassy for twenty days, the hostages were bound, blindfolded, covered with blankets, and taken to a series of makeshift prisons. During a series of seemingly endless interrogations, they were beaten and humiliated by their captors. Except for a rare "feast" of hamburgers and sodas, their meals consisted of bread and tea in the morning, cold rice at lunch, and cold soup at night. The only exercise that they were permitted was an hour of running in place in the morning. After three months, the hostages were placed in small cells; during their incarceration, they were not permitted to communicate. Hostages who violated the rules were locked in cold, dark cubicles for as long as three days. Toward the end of their confinement, they were forced to stand before a mock firing squad. When the hostages were finally released on January 20, 1981, their emaciated and hollow-eyed appearance provided mute testimony to the suffering that they had endured during their brutal ordeal. Impact of Event The taking of hostages from the U.S. embassy in Teheran immediately received worldwide attention. Most of the nations of the world joined the United States in condemning the actions of the Iranian revolutionaries. In 1983, a United Nations treaty took effect that called for ratifying nations to prosecute the hostage takers or to return them to their countries for trial. On the other hand, the success with which the Iranians used hostages to render a superpower impotent inspired terrorists in other nations, especially in the Middle East, to do the same. The unprecedented media coverage that the hostage crisis received also opened up a country that had previously been shrouded in mystery. Both during and after the hostage crisis, the United States and many other nations made a serious effort to understand the Iranian position. From the point of view of the revolutionary factions in Iran, the seizure of the U.S. embassy in Teheran was fortuitous because it helped to radicalize politics in Iran. Once the embassy was taken, the militants set about the task of piecing together shredded State Department documents they found, with the intention of proving their contention that the American embassy was a "nest of spies." The documents that the militants recovered supported their claim that the United States and the Soviet Union had joined forces to back the shah and oppose the revolution. As a result, the extremist factions had the proof that they needed to gain ascendancy over the moderates. By taking retribution against a superpower that had been perceived for years as an external threat, the extremists rallied the masses behind their cause. Most important, though, the taking of hostages effectively thwarted any attempt that the United States may have been considering to reverse the revolution. From the vantage point of the United States, the hostage crisis was a catastrophe with dire political consequences. The inability of the Carter Administration fully to appreciate the strength of the Islamic revival in Iran did irreparable harm to Carter's presidency. Further damage was done when a rescue mission had to be aborted in April, The failure of the operation known as Eagle Claw angered military and civilian leaders in the United States. The economic sanctions that President Carter set in place against Iran served only to increase the determination of the hostage takers. President Carter's unflagging support of the shah and his inability to resolve the hostage crisis probably contributed to Ronald Reagan's landslide presidential victory in The effects of the hostage crisis in Iran extended far beyond the Carter Administration. The hard feelings that were created by the episode went a long way toward shaping U.S. foreign policy in 3 of 5 9/18/12 8:15 PM

4 the Middle East. During the Iran-Iraq war, for example, the United States was unofficially on Iraq's side and even engaged in sporadic firefights with Iran in During the 1987 Iran-Contra hearings, officials of the National Security Commission stated that it was the embarrassment from the ill-fated rescue operation in 1980 that provided the incentive for the exchange of arms for hostages. The hostage crisis left behind a legacy of misunderstanding that crippled Iranian- American relations for years. FURTHER READINGS Beckwith, Charlie A.; Donald Knox. Delta Force. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Written by the man who brought America's only military counterintelligence unit into being, this book provides an insightful look into the reasons behind the failure of Operation Eagle Claw. Beckwith's lack of objectivity is most apparent in his assertion that the hostage situation could have been resolved faster if President Carter had been better briefed on the existing military capabilities for dealing with terrorism Bill, James A. The Shah, the Ayatollah, and the United States. Foreign Policy Association, This text is the most complete account now available of the events that led up to the taking of the American hostages in Teheran. A major drawback is the omission of any facts regarding the treatment of the hostages during their 444-day ordeal Jordan, Hamilton. Crisis. G. P. Putnam's Sons, This story of the last year of Jimmy Carter's presidency draws from official documents and interviews to illustrate Jordan's role in relocating the shah to Panama and his secret negotiations with the Khomeini government during the hostage crisis. The book benefits greatly from Jordan's firsthand involvement in the secret negotiations Kennedy, Moorhead. The Ayatollah in the Cathedral: Reflections of a Hostage. Hill & Wang, The author, the most widely known of the hostages, attacks not only the sadistic cruelty of the Iranian captors but also the arrogance of the U.S. government in Washington and in its embassies Kreisberg, Paul H., ed. American Hostages in Iran: The Conduct of a Crisis. Yale University Press, This insightful book tells the story of the delicate negotiations in the words of the key Americans, both inside and outside of government, who were intimately involved in the process of freeing the hostages Salinger, Pierre. America Held Hostage: The Secret Negotiations. Doubleday, Although the book lacks the authority of Jordan's first-person narrative, it is more objective in its reporting of the delicate diplomatic procedures that resulted in the release of the hostages. Salinger was a news correspondent reporting on the hostage crisis Scott, ColonelCharles W. Pieces of the Game: The Human Drama of Americans Held Hostage in Iran. Peachtree, Scott's dramatic account of his day-to-day existence as an American hostage in Teheran is both informative and inspirational Source Citation: "Iranian Revolutionaries Hold Americans Hostage, November 4, 1979-January 20, 1981." DISCovering World History. Online Detroit: Gale, Junior Reference Collection. Gale. Fuquay Varina High School/WCPSS/. 18 Sep of 5 9/18/12 8:15 PM

5 < &usergroupname=fuqu68371&prodid=jrc&tabid=t001&docid=ej &type=retrieve &contentset=gsrc&version=1.0>. Gale Document Number: EJ Gale, Cengage Learning. 5 of 5 9/18/12 8:15 PM

Iran Hostage Crisis

Iran Hostage Crisis 1979 1981 The Iran Hostage Crisis lasted from 1979 until 1980. Earlier American intervention with Iran led to this incident. During World War II, the Axis Powers were threatening to