IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
|
|
- Easter Bradford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.168/2004 APPELLANTS 1. Md Kurban Ali, S/o- Mofed Ali, Resident of Lungjhar village, P/o- Fagunagaon under Bijni Police Station, District- Bongaigaon, Assam 2. Md Abbas Ali, S/o- Late Md Mofed Ali, Resident of Lungjhar village, P/o- Bongaigaon under Bijni Police Station, District- Bongaigaon, Assam 3. Md Motleb Ali, S/o- Late Ismail Ali, Resident of Lungjhar village, P/o- Fagunagaon under Bijni Police Station, District- Bongaigaon, Assam 4. Md Sofi Ali, S/o- Late Suroj Jamal Seikh, Resident of Lungjhar village, P/o- Fagunagaon, District- Bongaigaon, Assam By Advocates : Mr HRA Choudhury, Sr Advocate Ms A Saikia, Mr AT Sarkar Versus RESPONDENT The State of Assam By Advocate : Mr Z Kamar, PP, Assam BEFORE HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR J CHELAMESWAR HON BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI DATE OF HEARING : DATE OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
2 2 JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) (Ansari, J) Vide judgment and order dated passed in Sessions Case No.30(B)/01 by the learned Adhoc Addl Sessions Judge, Bongaigaon all the present four appellants were convicted u/s 302 read with Sec 34 of the IPC. 2. The case of the prosecution as unfolded during trial may briefly be stated thus - On at about 11 AM when Joynal Abedin in the company of Atowa Bahadur (PW 2) and Almas Ali (since deceased) was proceeding towards Bijni, pushing his bicycle, and came near the house of accused Kurban Ali (appellant No.1) accused Abbas Ali (appellant No.2) came out of Kurban Ali s house and held Almas Ali s hand whereupon accused Kurban Ali came out and gave a blow with dao on the neck. Almas tried to flee but he was chased by accused Sujmal Haque, Motleb Ali, Surman Ali, Sofi Ali and Nur Nobi. Having covered a small distance Almas fell in the paddy field and all the accused persons gave blows with the weapons which they had in their hands. Accused Sofi Ali and Motleb Ali gave blows on Almas with daggers. On hearing hue and cry raised at the place of occurrence the accused persons fled away. Kurban Ali (PW 2) son of Almas Ali came to the place of occurrence on hearing hue and cry and saw the occurrence of assault on his father whereupon PW 1 and PW 2 went to Bijni Police Station where PW 1 lodged the First Information Report (FIR) (Ext-1) naming all the seven persons as accused. Based on the FIR a case was registered against the accused persons. The police visited the place of occurrence and having
3 3 found Almas lying dead at the place of occurrence held inquest over the dead body. On completion of investigation police framed charge against all the seven accused named in the FIR u/s 302 read with Sec 34 IPC. While accused Sujmal Haque, Surman Ali and Nurnabi absconded the remaining four accused, who are appellants in this appeal, faced the trial. 3. During trial all the appellants pleaded not guilty to the charges framed u/s 302 read with Sec 34 IPC. In support of their case the prosecution examined altogether ten witnesses. Having found all the appellants guilty of the charges framed against them the learned trial court convicted them accordingly and sentenced them to suffer imprisonment for life and pay find of Rs.5000/- each and in default of payment a fine RI for a further period of two months. Hence this appeal by the accused persons. 4. We have heard Mr HRA Choudhury, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the accused appellants and Mr Z Kamar, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam. 5. Appearing on behalf of the appellants Mr Choudhury, learned senior counsel has, broadly speaking, challenged the conviction of the appellants on the ground that all the eye witnesses, whom the prosecution has examined in this case, are related to the deceased and hence they are interested witnesses; that according to the evidence on record there are several houses near the place of occurrence but none other than the relatives of the deceased have been examined as eye witnesses and that the evidence adduced by the eye witnesses are inconsistent and there is variation between the description of the
4 4 occurrence as given in the FIR and the occurrence as has been described at the trial by the witnesses. The evidence on record does not show that all those, who have been named as assailants share the common intention of causing death of the said deceased. 6. Resisting the appeal the learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the witnesses who have been examined by the prosecution are natural witnesses and except PW 1, who had been an witness to the occurrence from its beginning too the end, none of the witnesses had seen the entire incident inasmuch as PW 7, who was accompanying PW 1 and the said deceased, at the time they were proceeding and the said deceased was caught hold of by accused Abbas, had ran away from the place of occurrence out of fear when there was an attempt to assault him too and would not have, therefore, seen the entire occurrence and sofar as the other witnesses are concerned them came to the place of occurrence on being attracted by hue and cry raised at the place of occurrence and hence in the circumstances, except PW 1, all the witnesses could not describe the events parrot like from the beginning to the end. The learned Public Prosecutor also pointed out that the fact that all the witnesses have not given same description of all the occurrence is an indication of the credibility of the witnesses and they can, therefore, be safely relied upon. It has been further pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor that the deceased sustained multiple injuries by sharp cutting and pointed weapon, such as, dao and daggers and in such circumstances the learned trial court has correctly concluded that the accused, who had faced the trial, and the ones who have absconded, shared common intention to put an end to the life of the deceased and had in furtherance of their common intention killed him. The conviction
5 5 of the accused appellants may, therefore, be maintained, so contends the learned Public Prosecutor. 7. Bearing in mind the submissions made on behalf of the accused appellants and the State we first start with the evidence of the doctor (PW 8). According to the evidence of this witness on he had performed post mortem examination on the dead body of Almas Ali and found as follows :- 1. Deep cut injury 10 X5 in the back of the middle of the neck with laceration of spinal cord. 2. Deep cut injury 10 X5 of face in the middle of the nose nos perforating injuries in the middle of the abdomen (Torn) perforation of intestine cut injuries in the right side of the chest with extrusion of lung tissue. 5. Cut injury in the left wrist joint which divided the both bones of th left fore arm in its lower end. 6. Cut injury in the left elbow joint. PW 8 has deposed that the injuries, as described above, were ante mortem in nature and blood was found present in and around the injuries. According to the opinion of the PW 8 the death was cause due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of the injuries sustained by the deceased, the injuries have been caused by sharp cutting weapons. The doctor has also opined that the injuries sustained by the said deceased were sufficient to cause death. It may now be noted that the evidence given by PW 8 as well as the opinion with regard to the nature of injuries found on the said dead body, the nature of weapon which might have been used and the cause of death had not been in dispute at the trial. This apart, we have carefully examined the evidence given by PW 8 and we find no reason to
6 6 disbelieve his findings. Accepting the evidence of the injuries, which the said deceased had sustained, we find it safe to conclude that the said deceased met with the death as a result of the injuries found on his body by PW 8. From the nature of the injuries which have been sustained by the said deceased it is also not difficult to conclude that the injuries were caused by sharp weapons. In the light of the medical evidence on record we now turn to the evidence of PW As already indicated above, PW 1 has claimed that he along with his uncle Almas Ali and PW 2 were proceeding towards Bijni from their house when the occurrence took place. Describing the occurrence PW 1 deposed that he was pushing his bicycle accompanied by Almas Ali and PW 2. When they came infront of the house of accused Kurban Ali, accused Abbas Ali came out of the house of the accused Kurban Ali and caught hold of Almas Ali. Immediately thereafter Kurban Ali came out of his house and gave a blow on the neck of Almas with a dao. It is also in the evidence of PW 1 that accused Abbas inflicted a blow with dao on the deceased person. Describing further, the PW 1 has deposed that the accused Motleb Ali and Safi Ali also inflicted dagger blows on Almas and Almas started to run but the accused pursued him and when Almas fell down on the ground at a distance of about 150 cubits from accused Kurban s house the accused persons beat and killed him It is also in the evidence of PW 1 that on being threatened by accused Nurnabi, Mazamel and Surman he ran from the place of occurrence and was standing near the house of one Jamer Ali. Jamere Ali s house being 50 cubits far from the place of occurrence. PW 1 has further deposed that Almas Ali had sustained several injuries on his neck, head, back, chest and abdomen. Almas Ali s son Kurban Ali (PW 2) came and both of them went to police station and he lodged the FIR which is Ext-1.
7 7 9. We have very carefully scrutinized the evidence of PW 1 but we do not find that anything could be elicited by the defence to show that the evidence of this witness, describing that the appellants had assaulted his uncle Almas, is untrue or exaggerated. We also noticed that in his cross examination PW 1 deposed that one lady by name Sakha was coming behind them and we find that this lady Sakha has been examined as PW 5. We, therefore, now turn to the evidence of PW According to PW 5 all the accused persons are co-villagers and on the day of the occurrence while she was proceeding towards the southern direction from her house she saw accused Abbas holding Almas Ali s hand in front of the house of accused Kurban Ali and at that time PW 1 and PW 7 were with Almas. While Accused Abbas Ali was holding the hands of Almas Ali accused Kuber Ali came and gave a blow with a dao on the neck of Almas. Accused Accused Safi Ali and Motleb came to the place of occurrence armed with dagger and assaulted Almas. It is in the evidence of PW 5 that though Almas tried to run away the accused persons pursued him and when Alams fell down he was further assaulted by the accused persons. It is also in the evidence of PW 5 that on witnessing the occurrence PW 7 fled away. Although PW 5 was put to cross examination by the defence nothing in particular could be elicited by the defence to show that the evidence given by this witness is not safe and rely upon. The evidence given by the PW 5 has even remained unshaken on material particulars and we see no reason to disbelieve her. 11. Next to the evidence of PW 5 is the evidence of PW 7 who was accompanying the deceased at the time of the occurrence. According to his evidence when he was proceeding along with PW 1 and the
8 8 deceased towards Bijni by pushing his bicycle and happened to be near the house of accused Kurban, accused Abbas, whose house is adjacent to the house of accused Kurban, came out followed by accused Motleb and Safi Ali. PW 7 has deposed that the accused Motleb threatened him by showing him a dagger and pushed him away and accused Kurban gave a blow with a dao on Almas. Witnessing the assault on Almas and on being threatened by accused Motleb, PW 7, according to what he has deposed, fled away from the scene and it was after about an hour of the occurrence that he came back to the place of occurrence and found Almas lying dead in the nearby field where many people had gathered. In his cross examination PW 7 deposed that he had fled away the scene immediately after attack on Almas and it was accused Kurban Ali who had first gave a blow with a dagger on Almas s neck. Nothing could be pointed out, one behalf of the accused appellants, to show that the evidence given by PW 7 is not believable. We find that the evidence of this witness remains unshaken in the cross examination. This apart, this witness has not made any attempt to exaggerate the description of the occurrence and candidly deposed that he had fled away from the scene of occurrence immediately after Almas had been assaulted by accused Kurban. 12. Yet another witness who has been examined as eye witness to the alleged occurrence is PW 6 whose evidence is that hearing hue and cry at the place of occurrence he came out of his house and saw accused Kuber, Safi Ali, Abbas and Motleb chasing Almas with arms in their hands and when Almas fell down all the accused persons assaulted him PW 6 also deposed that accused Abbas and Kurban were armed with dao where as accused Motleb and Safi were armed with dagger. PW 6 also deposed that on hearing hue and cry when he came out of his house he
9 9 had also seen PW 1 near the place of occurrence and after killing Almas the accused had left the place of occurrence whereupon he (PW 6) and PW 1 went near Almas and found him dead. Even the evidence of this witness could not be shaken by the defence by cross examination; rather, in his cross examination this witness has asserted that he had seen four accused, that is, the present appellants chasing Almas and assaulting him when he had fell on the ground. Thus the evidence of this PW 6 has remained unshaken. 13. What transpires from the combined reading of the evidences of PWs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, who had all been examined as eye witnesses, is that the said deceased accompanied by PW 7 and 2 happened to come near the house of accused Kuber, accused Abbas caught hold of the deceased, Kurban came with a dao and gave a blow with the dao on the neck of Almas and having sustained the blow on his neck when the deceased was trying to run away to save his life, he was chased by all the accused persons, who faced the trial, and gave blows with the weapons which the accused persons had held in their hands, accused Motleb and Safi holding daggers in their hands. T he medical evidence on record sufficiently corroborates and lends support to the evidence given by the eye witnesses inasmuch as the findings of PW 8 (the doctor) shows that the said deceased had sustained deep cut injuries on his neck and nose and four perforating injuries on his abdomen apart from two cut injuries which appeared on his chest and injuries on his wrist and elbow joints etc. The perforating injuries sustained on the abdomen by thet deceased could have been caused by dagger and the injuries on neck could have been caused by a dao. Thus the medical evidence on record supports the ocular evidence adduced by the prosecution.
10 Situated thus, it becomes clear that the said deceased had sustained multiple injuries on various parts of his body including such vital parts, such as, neck and abdomen. We have already pointed out above that the injuries sustained by the said deceased, as described by PW 8 were sufficient to cause death of a person in the normal course of events. The evidence on record clearly show that the deceased tried to save his life by running away from the place of occurrence but debarred, as the accused were chasing the deceased and when the deceased fell on the ground they gave several blows on the person of the deceased and put him to death. 15. What has appeared from the above events of discussion is that all the accused persons including the ones who have faced the trial intended to cause death of the said deceased and in furtherance of their common intention they assaulted the said deceased, chased him and when the deceased fell on the ground they further assaulted the deceased and put him to death. 16. In the circumstances, as described, there can be no escape from the conclusion, and we see no reason to take a view different from what the learned trial court has taken that the accused appellants had in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Almas Ali and thereby committed offence of murder. The accused appellants are liable to conviction u/s 302 read with 34 IPC. We see, therefore, no reason to interfere with the conviction of the accused appellants. So far as the sentence passed against the accused appellants is concerned, the same does not call for any interference inasmuch as the present one is the case where the accused appellants have been found guilty of an offence
11 11 u/s302 read with 34 IPC and the offence so committed need not warrant death sentence. 18. Because of what has been described and pointed out above, we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, therefore, fails and the same shall accordingly stand dismissed. Send back the Lower Court Records. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Mazumdar/
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal (J) No. 119 of 2015 Md. Jamaluddin & Another -Versus- The State of Assam & Another Appellants
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2009 Sri Ranjit Singh @ Raju ----- Appellant -Versus- State
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014 Fazrat Ali, S/o Late Panaulla Sheikh, Resident of village-chitalkandi, PO & PS-
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) Criminal Appeal (J) No.57 of 2015 1. Asuruddin 2.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.329/2007 APPELLANT Shri Lal Kumar Shrestha, Hav/Clk C/360945M 24 Assam
More informationMOOT PROBLEM. Geeta Institute of Law
MOOT PROBLEM Geeta Institute of Law GEETA INSTITUTE OF LAW Karhans, G.T. Road, NH-1, Samalkha, Panipat-132101 Email: moot2018@geeta.edu.in For Moot Problem Enquiry: 08397047687 DISCLAIMER The facts stated
More informationGuli Chand And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 November, 1973
Supreme Court of India Equivalent citations: AIR 1974 SC 276, 1974 CriLJ 331, (1974) 3 SCC 698, 1974 (6) UJ 121 SC, 1973 WLN 998 Author: Beg Bench: M Beg, Y Chandrachud JUDGMENT Beg, J. 1. The six appellants
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2013
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2013 Appellant/Accused. Abdul Khalique Barbhuiya & two others. Respondent. The State
More informationMADHUSUDAN LAW COLLEGE, CUTTACK, ODISHA ARMONIA 2015
MADHUSUDAN LAW COLLEGE, CUTTACK, ODISHA ARMONIA 2015 MOOT COURT PROPOSITION 1. Himtal is a small underdeveloped town in north-west Odisha with a very thin population. This town is one of the coldest places
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4692/2008 1. Md. Sadek Hussain, S/O. Late Ahmed Hussain, Resident of village F.A. Ahmed Nagar,
More informationMOOT PROPOSITION. 1 Pa g e
MOOT PROPOSITION 1. The Respondent Ganesh Gaitonde who just then graduated from the Medical College was staying with the family consisting of his parents, his brothers, his sister-in-law Smt. Samaskhi
More informationBAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajat Brar, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL MAC.APP. No.163/2012 Judgment reserved on: 28th February, 2013 Judgment delivered on: 1st April, 2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) Crl. Appeal (J) No.119 of 2012 With Crl. Appeal No.276
More informationBar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Case 2: R v Grey. England, Wales and Northern Ireland
Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18 England, Wales and Northern Ireland The Queen v Deniz Grey Summary of Allegation The victim, Vick Mathias, and defendant, Deniz Grey, were living together when these
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2008-Ohio-2577.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2007 CA 40 v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487 MICHAEL MOORE : (Criminal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and DARWIN SMITH ISLAND SECURITY LIMITED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES GRENADA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2004/0447 BETWEEN: WILTON GRIMES BRIAN GRIMES and DARWIN SMITH ISLAND SECURITY
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000426 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095450769 OCN: CW005614 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CHRISTOPHER J WILSON ) 10825 Gregory
More informationBar Mock Trial Competition 2016/17. Case 2: R v Edwards
Bar Mock Trial Competition 2016/17 The Queen v Alex Edwards (Case 2) Summary of Facts This is an incident which took place between two neighbours. There have been previous disputes between them before
More information- 6 - Brown interviewed Kimball in the police station that evening and Kimball was cooperative and volunteered the following information:
- 6 - CONSTABLE M. BROWN CROWN WITNESS#1 Police Constable M. Brown (Brown) is 35 years old. Brown spent 7 years on traffic duty and for the last seven years has been on the homicide squad. Most of Brown's
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: PA/13137/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On November 30, 2018 On December 7, 2018 Before DEPUTY
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI STATE OF
More informationCase Name: R. v. Koumoudouros. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros. [2005] O.J. No Certificate No.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Koumoudouros Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Branita Koumoudouros [2005] O.J. No. 5055 Certificate No. 68643727 Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton, Ontario B. Zabel J. Heard:
More informationNotes for Assistance in Respect of BSB Charges
Notes for Assistance in Respect of BSB Charges Material relevant to charge 1. 1. In its most basic form the core of a defence of entrapment, if it existed, would be that if the jury were sure that the
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL 1. W.P (C) NO. 1266 OF 2002 1. Shri Gurumayum Sanahal Sharma, aged about 32 years. 2. Shri Gurumayum Bisharup Sharma, aged about 30 years. 3. Shri Gurumayum Brajamohon
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Sedgwick District Court;
More informationNo. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered November 20, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C.Cr.P. No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: LESTER CADORE AND
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES GRENADA CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2005/0009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: LESTER CADORE AND ISLAND SECURITY LIMITED Claimant Defendant
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 112/2014 (WZ)
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL (WESTERN ZONE) BENCH, PUNE APPLICATION No. 112/2014 (WZ) CORAM: Hon ble Mr. Justice V.R. Kingaonkar (Judicial Member) Hon ble Dr. Ajay A. Deshpande (Expert Member) B
More informationState of Minnesota County of Olmsted
State of Minnesota County of Olmsted District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 11005953 Court File No. 55-CR-11-1054 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Order of Detention VS. MICHAEL
More informationSpecial Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, by Alison Thompson Senior Researcher
Page 1 of 5 U.C. BerkeleyWar Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #84a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 21 July, 2006 by Alison Thompson
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRANCE SMITH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3382 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Judgment of
More informationNO KA-1557 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EARL PAYNE, JR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS EARL PAYNE, JR. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2008-KA-1557 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 475-290, SECTION
More informationOne Bangladeshi killed and two shot and wounded by the BSF at the Gazipur border under Satkhira district
One Bangladeshi killed and two shot and wounded by the BSF at the Gazipur border under Satkhira district Fact-finding Report Odhikar On April 18, 2011 at around 1.00 am, Rekatul Islam (17) was shot dead
More informationSpecial Court Monitoring Program Update #80a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 23 June, by Alison Thompson Senior Researcher
Page 1 of 6 U.C. BerkeleyWar Crimes Studies Center Sierra Leone Trial Monitoring Program Weekly Report Special Court Monitoring Program Update #80a Trial Chamber I - RUF Trial 23 June, 2006 by Alison Thompson
More informationFirst Group: OMOREGIE, NWOKEH and ODEGBUNE:
SENTENCING REMARKS OF HHJ CHRISTOPHER MOSS QC CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT 20 APRIL 2012 R V CHRISTOPHER OMOREGIE, OBI NWOKEH, SAMSON ODEGBUNE, FEMI OSERINWALE, ADONIS AKRA, SAMUEL ROBERTS, ENOCH AMOAH AND TYRONE
More informationHIGH COURT BISHO JUDGMENT
HIGH COURT BISHO CASE No. CC 16/99 In the matter between: THE STATE versus CHEMIST NONTSHINGA JUDGMENT EBRAHIM J: The accused, Chemist Nontshinga, has been arraigned on one count of murder and a count
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before : Mr G Warr (Vice President) Mr G F Sandall Mr F T Jamieson. Secretary of State for the Home Department.
KH Heard at: Field House On 11 November 2004 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL DC (Non-traditional evangelical Group) Geogia [2004] UKIAT 00320 Date Determination notified: 15/12/2004 Between Before : Mr G Warr
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DON SIDDALL Appeal from the Hamilton County Criminal Court No. 267654 Don W. Poole, Judge
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 10-936 CLEVELAND EVANS, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLANT, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered February 3, 2011 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CR 2008-5049, HON.
More informationPerjury Warrant Denied Against Former DPD Deputy Chief James Tolbert
KYM L. WORTHY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY COUNTY OF WAYNE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY FRANK MURPHY HALL OF JUSTICE 1441 ST. ANTOINE STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-2302 Press Release July 12, 2016 Five
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2010-Ohio-4006.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93593 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERIC SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationDecided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: February 6, 2017 HUNSTEIN, Justice. S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder and related offenses in
More information10.47am: Justice Byrne first summarised the defence case for the jury.
10.47am: Justice Byrne first summarised the defence case for the jury. He said barrister Michael Byrne QC, for the accused, told the jury in his closing address that family, friends and the Baden-Clay
More informationCRIME IN GOODHUE COUNTY
CRIME IN GOODHUE COUNTY 1854-1877 FOREWORD BY DOUGLAS A. HEDIN EDITOR, MLHP The first session of the district court in Goodhue County was held in 1854 in the law office of Philander Sanford, who had arrived
More informationBefore HIS HONOUR JUDGE SAFFMAN. LEEDS CITY COUNCIL (Claimant) -v- JOHN McDONAGH (Defendant) APPROVED JUDGMENT
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LEEDS Case No. C74LS267 The Combined Court Centre Oxford Row Leeds 1st March 2017 Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE SAFFMAN LEEDS CITY COUNCIL (Claimant) -v- JOHN McDONAGH (Defendant) APPROVED
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued May 26, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-10-00680-CR JOSE SORTO JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 412th District Court
More informationSIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Ralph Chamness Civil Division SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Jeffrey William Hall Lisa Ashman Administrative Operations FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Feb. 18, 2014 Contact Sim Gill: (801) 230-1209 or sgill@slco.org
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. R K Thomson for Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2013-404-162 [2013] NZHC 3567 BETWEEN AND JOSEPH LOUIS EUGENIOUS SMITH Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 14 October 2013 Appearances:
More informationMamun from Meherpur District Allegedly Shot to Death Under the Cover of Shoot-out by Police at Doulatpur in Kushtia District
Mamun from Meherpur District Allegedly Shot to Death Under the Cover of Shoot-out by Police at Doulatpur in Kushtia District Fact-finding Report Odhikar Mohammad Mamun-Ar-Rashid (37), a resident of the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SWAZILAND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SWAZILAND In the matter between: CRIM. CASE NO.10098 REX VS MGCIBELO MALINDZISA & 8 OTHERS CORAM : MATSEBULA J FOR THE CROWN : MS. NDERI FOR THE ACCUSED : MR. NTIWANE JUDGMENT The
More informationYouth Policy Of Taupo Baptist Church Taupo, New Zealand
Youth Policy Of Taupo Baptist Church Taupo, New Zealand POLICE VETTING Taupo Baptist Church has a commitment to the health and safety of those most vulnerable. Therefore a police check is to be carried
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JOHN MOSLEY Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL NO. C-150627 TRIAL NO. 15CRB-25900 JUDGMENT
More informationHistoric Prosecutions by Gregg Marx and other members of the Fairfield County Prosecutor s Office
Historic Prosecutions by Gregg Marx and other members of the Fairfield County Prosecutor s Office John Theodore Engle, Jr. In March, 1989, John Engle put his son, Christopher Engle, age 4, in scalding
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 19-000697 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095451472 OCN: STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) ) CLIFTON L. JACK ) 1404 NE Ivory Lane )
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY APPELLEES SECOND MOTION AND BRIEF FOR RECONSIDERATION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY PAM HICKS and JOHN MARK BYERS APPELLANTS v. CV-2012-290-6 THE CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARKANSAS, and SCOTT ELLINGTON, in his Official Capacities as Prosecuting Attorney
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2008-Ohio-6954.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90996 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DONTA SMITH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. McMichael, 2012-Ohio-1343.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 96970 and 96971 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. TREA
More informationNow, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who. brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do.
- 7189 - Always? Now, I want to know, who is in charge of the dockets, who brings the dockets to the Prosecutor? I do. Always? Never Sgt. Kruger? Well, once it is with the Prosecutor I am finished with
More informationTHOMPSON KILLER WAS WHITE, NOT BLACK:
Michael Goodwin, creator of the sport of Supercross, was convicted in 2007 of ordering the murders of Mickey Thompson, 1960 s- 70 s Indy and off road racing legend, and his wife Trudy in 1988. Goodwin
More informationSuffolk County District Attorney. Inaugural Remarks
Suffolk County District Attorney Inaugural Remarks Greetings, and thank you all for being a part of this special occasion. There are so many people to thank. First, I want to thank the County Executive
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2011-Ohio-965.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 09CA16 : vs. : Released: February 24, 2011
More informationBE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the Bishop Clergy and Laity of the Diocese of Perth in Synod assembled
- 126 - CLERGY DISCIPLINE STATUTE To provide for the maintenance of due order and discipline among the Clergy of the Diocese of Perth, and to guard against errors of Doctrine WHEREAS it is expedient to
More informationBoth Hollingsworth and Schroeder testified that as Branch Davidians, they thought that God's true believers were
The verdict isn't in yet, but the fate of the 11 Branch Davidians being tried in San Antonio will probably turn on the jury's evaluation of the testimony of the government's two star witnesses, Victorine
More informationSTATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2008 ME 77 Docket: Oxf-07-645 Argued: April 8, 2008 Decided: May 6, 2008 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, and MEAD,
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00457-CR Bernard Malli, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3013458,
More informationQualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible Evidence About Alternative Murder Suspects
Civil Rights Update David A. Perkins and Melissa N. Schoenbein Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C., Peoria Qualified Immunity Applied to Prosecutors and Police Officers Who Failed to Disclose Inadmissible
More informationZina, Rape and Pregnancy
Zina, Rape and Pregnancy CASE NAME Rani v The State CITATION PLD 1996 Karachi 316 COURT Pakistan. Level of Court: Karachi, Criminal Appeal No 2 Names of Judges: DrGhous Muhammad, Rasheed Ahmed Razvi, JJ
More informationZina, Rape and Pregnancy: Rani v The State
Zina, Rape and Pregnancy: Rani v The State Summary of facts: At 7 months pregnant, Mst Rani lodged an F.I.R alleging Faqiro, aided and abetted by Rehmat raped her at knife point, which subsequently resulted
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationTo the president of Euro Commission Mr. Joze Manuel Durau Barosu!
To the president of Euro Commission Mr. Joze Manuel Durau Barosu! Your highness, Mr. President I the head of International Media-Union of Journalists Obiektivi Irma Inashvili address you. We, the independent
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 11, 2003 v No. 234749 Berrien Circuit Court ROBERT LEE THOMAS, LC No. 2000-402258-FC Defendant-Appellant.
More informationKorban Ali (25) shot to death and Amena Akhter (13) injured by shooting in Mutubi village of Shonaimuri Upazila under Noakhali district
Korban Ali (25) shot to death and Amena Akhter (13) injured by shooting in Mutubi village of Shonaimuri Upazila under Noakhali district Fact Finding Report Odhikar On February 28, 2013 the International
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SHOOTING OF A MALE BY A MEMBER OF THE RCMP NEAR THE CITY OF KELOWNA, BRITISH COLUMBIA ON AUGUST 3, 2017
IN THE MATTER OF THE SHOOTING OF A MALE BY A MEMBER OF THE RCMP NEAR THE CITY OF KELOWNA, BRITISH COLUMBIA ON AUGUST 3, 2017 DECISION OF THE CHIEF CIVILIAN DIRECTOR OF THE INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS OFFICE
More informationSenior Police Officer Harassed, Assaulted and Forced Two Minors into Marriage - Pirojpur ASK Investigation Report
Senior Police Officer Harassed, Assaulted and Forced Two Minors into Marriage - Pirojpur ASK Investigation Report Date of the Incident 12 March 2014 Place of the Incident Pirojpur Rajlokkhi Foundation,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID SMITH, II, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED.
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI-2015-087-000856 [2017] NZDC 10353 THE QUEEN v GODFREY TE RITO TAMIHANA TUKAKI DESMOND
More informationInternational Commission of Jurists
International Commission of Jurists Asia Bibi s blasphemy case: Final plea for justice Questions and Answers October 2016 The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) releases the following Questions
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE POLICE NO. : 17-058838 PROSECUTOR NO. : 095440950 STATE OF MISSOURI, ) PLAINTIFF, ) vs. ) PATRICK L. BARKWELL ) 11409 E. Anderson, ) Sugar
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION IN RE: PRIVATE CRIMINAL : COMPLAINT OF : NO. MD-042-2014 GERALD J. SMITH : Seth Miller, Esquire Cynthia A. Dyrda-Hatton Gerald
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
In the matter of section 19(3) of the Inquiries Act 2005 Applications for restriction orders in respect of the real and cover names of officers of the Special Operations Squad and the Special Demonstrations
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 31.07.2009 Judgment delivered on: 06.08.2009 + CRL. APPEAL 172/2008 BALJEET KUMAR Appellant Through : Mr.Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE
[Cite as State v. Monroe, 2009-Ohio-4994.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92291 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs. DARREN MONROE
More informationCenter on Wrongful Convictions
CASE SUMMARY CATEGORY: DEFENDANT S NAME: JURISDICTION: RESEARCHED BY: Exoneration Steve Smith Cook County, Illinois Rob Warden Center on Wrongful Convictions DATE LAST REVISED: September 24, 2001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationthe Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations
IN THE MATTER OF a complaint pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Public Complaints Regulations AND IN THE MATTER OF a Public Complaint Adjudication pursuant to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary
More informationJurors, Former Prosecutors and Judges Urge Governor Warner to Grant Clemency to Norfolk Four
For Immediate Release Contact: Laura Burstein, 202-557-7584 January 4, 2006 Amy Levey, 202-557-7513 Jurors, Former Prosecutors and Judges Urge Governor Warner to Grant Clemency to Norfolk Four Cite Evidence
More informationSIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Ralph Chamness Chief Deputy Civil Division SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY Jeffrey William Hall Chief Deputy Justice Division Lisa Ashman Administrative Operations FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 7, 2014 Blake
More informationAbetting attempt to suicide or attempting to abet Suicide
1 Abetting attempt to suicide or attempting to abet Suicide Prepared by Rakesh Kumar Singh ************* In the present paper, we will discuss some interesting situations about the concept of suicide.
More informationPresiding Judge Robert Fremr, Judge Kuniko Ozaki and Judge Chang-ho Chung
ICC-0/0-0/0-T-0-Red-ENG WT 0-0-0 / SZ T Trial Hearing (Open Session) ICC-0/0-0/0 0 0 International Criminal Court Trial Chamber VI Situation: Democratic Republic of the Congo In the case of The Prosecutor
More informationSUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 13 PETITIONER: BRIJ LAL
http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 13 PETITIONER: BRIJ LAL Vs. RESPONDENT: PREM CHAND & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT20/04/1989 BENCH: NATRAJAN, S. (J) BENCH: NATRAJAN, S. (J) AHMADI, A.M. (J)
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : JUSTIN JAMES ROZNOWSKI, : : Appellant : No. 1857 WDA
More informationCOLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT
1 of 8 1/17/2014 6:06 PM State, The (Columbia, SC) 2002-05-26 Section: FRONT Edition: FINAL Page: A1 COLUMBIA'S FIRST BAPTIST FACES LAWSUIT OVER FORMER DEACON'S CONDUCT RICK BRUNDRETT and ALLISON ASKINS
More informationPOLICE BOARD CITY OF CHICAGO. NOTICE REGARDING CASE Nos. 16 PB 2918 & 17 PB 2936
POLICE BOARD CITY OF CHICAGO NOTICE REGARDING CASE Nos. 16 PB 2918 & 17 PB 2936 Please be advised that: The following Findings and Decision contains profane statements that some may find offensive. The
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Leca, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers' Compensation : Appeal Board : (School District of Philadelphia), : No. 404 C.D. 2013 Respondent : Submitted: June 28,
More informationthe election of a hindu nationalist unleashes a wave of persecution against christians
The Modi Effect the election of a hindu nationalist unleashes a wave of persecution against christians BY WILLIAM STARK As feared by many Christian communities across India, threats, social boycotts, church
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 17-AA-13
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 17-AA-13 2461 CORPORATION T/A MADAM S ORGAN, PETITIONER, MAY 1, 2018 V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, RESPONDENT. Petition for Review
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-1399 WILLIAM T. LOWERY, SR. VERSUS GREGORY ALLEN HERBERT, ET AL ************ APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. LANDRY,
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-third session, 31 August 4 September 2015
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 17 September 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. CANADA ) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ) against ) YOURTOWN REGION ) MARCEL(LE) LECOUTEAU
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE CANADA ) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ) against ) YOURTOWN REGION ) MARCEL(LE) LECOUTEAU 1. MARCEL(LE) LECOUTEAU stands charged that s/he, on or about the
More informationCase Name: R. v. Singh. Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota. [2011] B.C.J. No BCPC W.C.B. (2d) CarswellBC 362
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Singh Between Regina, and Joga Singh Sahota [2011] B.C.J. No. 305 2011 BCPC 42 92 W.C.B. (2d) 780 2011 CarswellBC 362 File No. 54579 Registry: North Vancouver British Columbia Provincial
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 5, 2005 v No. 252308 Wayne Circuit Court ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON, LC No. 03-007705-01 Defendant-Appellant.
More information