Comments on Robert Reymond s Supralapsarianism
|
|
- Wilfrid Park
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comments on Robert Reymond s Supralapsarianism Concerning the Biblically informed Christian Because the dispute between supralapsarians and infralapsarians is essentially a parochial one among those who accept a doctrine of limited election, I am less interested in the details of this particular dispute than I am in an assumption that both parties accept: the assumption that God restricts his mercy to a limited elect. So the question I would pose, right at the outset, is this: Has Robert Reymond provided anything remotely like a strong biblical argument, or even any argument at all, for a doctrine of limited election? And the correct answer, I believe, is that he has not. First, one cannot successfully argue that Paul, for example, held a doctrine of limited election simply by pointing to a few texts in Romans 9 while ignoring Paul s own conclusion in Romans 11 and ignoring, in particular, Paul s explicit statement in verse 32 that God is merciful to all; and second, even if one should restrict oneself to Romans 9, not one word there implies a final and irrevocable rejection of anyone, whether it be Ishmael, Esau, Pharaoh, or Paul s unbelieving kin. You can read the idea of irrevocable rejection into Romans 9, but you cannot find anything there that entails such an idea. Now I would have no one interpret these remarks as a criticism of Reymond. None of us can do everything at once, and it is perfectly appropriate for Reymond to construct an argument for supralapsarianism within the context of certain assumptions. By assumption here, I do not mean something like an absolute presupposition. I mean (roughly) any proposition that one employs as a premise in the context of a given discussion and does so without a supporting argument in the same context. Because none of us can do everything at once, as I said, we all argue from assumptions in this sense; that is, we often employ as a premise some proposition not at issue in a given discussion. All parties to the present discussion, for example, can appropriately
2 2 assume that Jesus Christ was raised from the dead, and it matters not that this assumption would merely beg the question against anyone who might be skeptical of the resurrection. But here is where I think Reymond overplays his hand. In the early part of his essay, he repeats the expression biblically informed Christian again and again and repeatedly treats some controversial issue, such as a belief in absolute determinism or the doctrine of reprobation, as if no biblically informed Christian could possibly reject it. He thus concludes that the biblically informed Christian will, in short, espouse the Reformed faith that is in turn simply the Faith of the Holy Scripture itself. 1 But this way of speaking, however appropriate it may be for an inhouse discussion among Calvinists, does nothing to advance a plausible case against either Arminianism or Christian universalism. For in a discussion among Christians with theological differences, such language amounts to little more than the dogmatic assertion, My interpretation of the Bible is right, and yours is wrong! As an illustration of the problem, consider just one premise in Reymond s argument for limited atonement: the premise that neither Scripture, history, nor Christian experience will tolerate the conclusion that all men have become, are becoming, or shall become Christians. 2 In the context of his case against the Amyraldians, this premise plays a powerful role in Reymond s argument for limited atonement. But in a larger context, it does nothing to advance the case against universalism, because in that context it merely begs the question or assumes the very point that Reymond needs to demonstrate. How, after all, is Christian experience even relevant to the question of whether God will eventually reconcile all sinners to himself through the blood of Christ? And how is history relevant? If history teaches anything, it is the extent to which orthodoxy, as we now understand it, was the product of imperial politics and was preserved by the 1 Manuscript, p Manuscript, p. 24
3 3 power of the sword. As for the teaching of Scripture, Reymond can hardly deny that a text such as Romans 5:18-19 at least appears, when taken in its own context, to teach universalism. Even John Murray, perhaps the best of the Reformed New Testament scholars, admitted this when he asked: Is this [the second half of 5:18] to be interpreted as embracively as the terms appear to imply? (my emphasis). He then went on to write: There is no possibility of escaping the conclusion that, if the apostle meant the apodosis to be as embracive in its scope as the protasis [that is, if Paul really meant what his words in fact say], then the whole human race must eventually attain eternal life. 3 And similarly for 1 Corinthians 15:20-28: Anyone without prior theological commitments who just reads this text (in a grammatically correct translation) would likely conclude that, according to it, the very same all humans who died in Adam will eventually belong to Christ and will thus be made alive in him as well. So just how, exactly, are we to interpret Reymond s claim that Scripture (or the Bible as a whole?) will not tolerate a doctrine of universal reconciliation? Perhaps as follows: Whatever such texts as Romans 5:18 and 1 Corinthians 15:20-28 may appear to teach in their own context, other texts, such as Matthew 25:46 or 2 Thessalonians 1:9, exclude the very possibility of universal reconciliation. But one could just as easily make essentially the same claim in the reverse direction: Whatever such texts as Matthew 25:46 and 2 Thessalonians 1:9 may appear to teach in their own context, other texts, such as Romans 5:18 or 1 Corinthians 15:20-28 exclude the very possibility of an everlasting separation from God. So which claim, if either, should we accept? One possibility, which Reymond and I both reject, is that the Bible as a whole is simply inconsistent on this matter; another, which Reymond no doubt accepts, is that, contrary to appearances, Romans 5:18 and 1 Corinthians 15:20-28 carry no implication of universal reconcilia- 3 John Murray, Epistle of Paul to the Romans, Vol. I (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1960), p. 202.
4 4 tion; and still another, which seems to me the sober truth of the matter, is that, contrary to initial appearances, Matthew 25:46 and 2 Thessalonians 1:9 carry no implication of unending punishment. But whatever position one adopts, the fact is that any interpretation of the Bible as a whole is a far more complex affair than Reymond appears to acknowledge. Interpreting the Bible As a Whole One of the best ways, in my opinion, to appreciate some of the complexities in interpreting the Bible as a whole is to reflect upon the following inconsistent set of propositions: (1) God s redemptive love extends to all human sinners equally, and he therefore sincerely wills or desires the redemption of all humans in the sense that, for any two of them, s and s*, God wills or desires the redemption of s in every sense that he wills or desires the redemption of s*. (2) God s redemptive love will triumph in the end and successfully accomplish the redemption of everyone whose redemption he sincerely wills or desires. (3) Some human sinners will never be reconciled to God but will instead be separated from God forever. Two clarifications are perhaps in order at the outset: First, proposition (1), as I here formulate it, is a bit more complicated than I would like because I want to guarantee that no one who accepts a doctrine of limited election can consistently accept it. For even if, as Bruce Ware insists, God suffers from a conflict of will or desire in the matter of saving the non-elect and therefore does will or desire (in some attenuated or conflicted sense) their redemption and reconciliation, he could not possibly will the redemption of the non-elect in every sense in which he wills the redemption of the elect. Second, proposition (2) does not merely say that God has the power to redeem everyone whose redemption he sincerely wills or desires; it says instead that he will in
5 5 fact accomplish the redemption of everyone whose redemption he sincerely wills or desires. So if someone holds that God has the power to save all but chooses not to exercise it, then this person has already rejected proposition (2). And though Bruce Ware might join the Arminians in rejecting (2), as stated, he would have to accept (2*) God s redemptive love will triumph in the end and successfully accomplish the redemption of everyone whose redemption he sincerely wills or desires in every sense in which he wills or desires the redemption of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Now if the above set of propositions, consisting of (1), (2), and (3), is logically inconsistent, as it surely is, then at least one proposition in the set is false. But which one? Augustinians, such as Reymond and Ware, reject (1); Arminians and open theists, such as Jack Cottrell and Clark Pinnock respectively, reject (2); and we Christian universalists reject (3). The problem, however, is that in each case the rejected proposition is one that other biblically informed Christians, including some highly competent and highly respected Bible scholars, accept as a clear and obvious teaching of Scripture. 4 So in that respect, all reflective Christians are in the same theological boat, so to speak; they must either reject a proposition that other competent scholars accept as a clear and obvious teaching of Scripture or simply concede that the teachings of Scripture are logically inconsistent. My point is not that all three theological positions are equally cogent; far from it. I continue to believe that Christian universalism provides the best and most reasonable interpretation of the Bible as a whole. But I am not so naïve as to expect that every biblically informed Christian, including Reymond, will automatically agree with me. 4 For a quick survey of the texts that might initially seem to support each of the three propositions, see Thomas Talbott, Towards a Better Understanding of Universalism, in Robin Parry and Christopher Partridge, Universal Salvation? The Current Debate (William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company: Grand Rapids, 2004), pp
6 6 In any event, Reymond and I both accept proposition (2), which states that God s redemptive love will triumph in the end. So part of the issue between us is this: Which is stronger, the biblical warrant for believing that God loves all persons equally (proposition (1)), or the biblical warrant for believing that some of those created in the image of God will be lost forever (proposition (3))? But that is only part of the issue between us. For one can also weaken the case for any one proposition in our inconsistent set simply by strengthening the case for the other two. So if (a) the biblical case for (1) is as overwhelmingly strong as I have claimed in my own essay and (b) someone should present an equally strong biblical case for (3), the proper response would then be to reject (2), join the ranks of the Arminians, and deny the sovereignty of God s salvific will. Alternatively, if the biblical case for (1) and the biblical case for (2) are both overwhelmingly strong, as I believe they are, then that might outweigh even a strong prima facie case for (3). It is not enough, in other words, merely to cite the standard proof texts on behalf of (3) or to consider (3) in isolation from (1) and (2). One must instead show that the biblical grounds for believing in everlasting separation are either stronger than those for believing in the universality of God s redemptive love or stronger than those for believing in the sovereignty of God s salvific will a daunting task indeed! And from my point of view anyway, Reymond appears not even to appreciate the enormity of the task. Destruction and Redemption In my own chapter, I try to build a strong biblical case for proposition (1) and a strong biblical case for proposition (2). But though I also say a lot about Paul s understanding of divine judgment, I say nothing there about the most important proof texts typically cited on behalf of proposition (3); in that respect, my argument is seriously incomplete. So in opposition to Reymond s sweeping claim that Scripture will not tolerate a doctrine of universal reconciliation and
7 7 in support of my own conviction that St. Paul was a universalist, I shall now explain why, in my opinion, 2 Thessalonians 1:9 carries no implication of an everlasting separation from God. 5 In fact, the Greek carries no implication of separation at all. The sole reason that some translators inject the idea of separation into the text is that the Greek apo, like the English from, can sometimes mean away from as when, for instance, the kings of the earth and others cry out to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us and hide us from (apo) the face of the one seated on the throne and from (apo) the wrath of the Lamb (Rev. 6:15-16). When we try to hide or to conceal ourselves from the presence of the Lord an impossible task we are indeed trying to get away from that presence. But in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 we find no verb, such as to hide or to conceal, and no other grammatical device that would give grammatical sense to such a rendering. In the absence of such a device, it is no less grammatically incorrect to translate olethron aionion apo prosopou tou kuriou as eternal destruction away from the presence of the Lord than it would be to translate kairoi anapsuxeos apo prosopou tou kuriou (Acts 3:19) as refreshing times away from the presence of the Lord. Not only is the grammar identical in the two texts; taken together, they tell us that the presence of the Lord brings both refreshing times to the obedient and destruction upon the disobedient. Not one word here implies an exclusion from the presence of the Lord. Neither does anything here imply the absence of mercy. According to Paul, so I argued in my own essay, even God s severity and harshest judgment express his boundless mercy; and if that is true, then the concept of destruction, as Paul understood it, should likewise turn out to be a redemptive concept. And so it does. We see this clearly in 1 Corinthians 5:1-5, where in the name of the Lord Jesus Paul himself pronounced judgment on a man living with his father s 5 For my interpretation of Matthew 25:46, see my remarks in Robin A Parry and Christopher H. Partridge, op. cit., pp & pp n.33.
8 8 wife. So incensed was Paul by this immorality an immorality not found even among pagans (5:1) that he ordered the Corinthians to hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh (5:5). Now just how should we understand the destruction of the flesh here? Clearly Paul did not have in mind the destruction of the body; he was not here contemplating the possibility of disembodied existence. And as Leon Morris has pointed out, the flesh often denotes the whole personality of man as organized in the wrong direction, as directed to earthly pursuits rather than the service of God. 6 So in a very real sense, the destruction of the flesh is the destruction of a person that is, the old person, the vessel of wrath, the sinful nature, the very thing we call ourselves. And what, I ask, could be more frightening than being handed over to Satan for the destruction of an entire personality as organized in the wrong direction? This hardly sounds like a mere chastening of a believer, something akin to parental chastisement; to the contrary, it is every bit as harsh as anything we encounter in the context of 2 Thessalonians 1:9, and the prescribed punishment definitely has a retributivist flavor to it. We might never have suspected, therefore, that Paul intended the punishment for the man s own good, had he not explicitly written: hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. But that is just what he did write. In 1 Corinthians 5:5, he was clearly thinking of destruction (olethros) in a redemptive context, albeit a harsh one, and nothing in the context of 2 Thessalonians 1:9 prevents us from thinking of it that way there as well. Even as mistranslated in some of our English Bibles, moreover, 2 Thessalonians 1:9 is the only text in the entire Pauline corpus that might initially seem to imply a doctrine of everlasting separation from God. On the other side, we have the clear universalistic thrust of Romans 5:12-21 and 1 Corinthians 15:20-28, the universalistic implications of Ephesians 1:10, Colossians 6 See Morris entry on flesh in J.D Douglas, The New Bible Dictionary (London: IVP, 1962), p. 426.
9 9 1:20, and Philippians 2:9-11, and the explicit teaching of Romans 11 that God is merciful to all and merciful even in his severity. The evidence seems to me overwhelming, therefore, that Paul himself proclaimed a doctrine of universal reconciliation; and if that is true, then we are entitled to reject Reymond s sweeping (and unsubstantiated) generalization that Scripture will not tolerate the very doctrine that Paul himself seems clearly to have held.
(Revised 3/9/02) CHAPTER 1: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF UNIVERSALISM. A Brief Autobiographical Note
(Revised 3/9/02) CHAPTER 1: TOWARDS A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF UNIVERSALISM A Brief Autobiographical Note As a young man growing up in a conservative evangelical church, it never occurred to me even to
More informationComments on Bruce Ware s Infralapsarianism
Comments on Bruce Ware s Infralapsarianism Like Robert Reymond, Bruce Ware defends a doctrine of limited election; and like Reymond, Ware pretty much assumes, without supporting argument, that universalism
More informationTHE REFORMED ROAD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE SUPRALAPSARIANISM FOR CALVINISM
THE REFORMED ROAD AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SUPRALAPSARIANISM FOR CALVINISM How far have you gone down the Reformed road? How far are you willing to go? It is no secret that I believe that Calvinism (in
More informationComments on Clark Pinnock s Corporate and Vocational Understanding of. Election
Comments on Clark Pinnock s Corporate and Vocational Understanding of Election How should Christians respond to a teaching, even one with seemingly impressive biblical credentials and a long history of
More informationRomans What About The Jews - Part 2 August 16, 2015
Romans What About The Jews - Part 2 August 16, 2015 I. Review A. Today marks the third Sunday on Romans 9. Most of the first two Sundays were spent laying the groundwork for pursuing an understanding of
More informationUnconditional Election
Unconditional Election Introduction. Unconditional election is a fancy phrase that refers to what is commonly known as Predestination. Predestinate comes from the Greek word proorizo. This word was translated
More informationsinners. Jesus Christ suffered on behalf of certain sinners. He represented certain sinners. He suffered as a vicarious sacrifice.
God says in Mark 16:16 that those who do not believe the gospel are unregenerate. He says in 1 Corinthians 15:3 that the gospel includes the truth that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures.
More informationAsk and You Shall Receive:
Ask and You Shall Receive: Questions & Answers by Various CALVIN AND CALVINISM Q In the conclusion of Shawn Lazar s recent article, Cheap Grace or Cheap Law, he implied that Calvin denied faith alone in
More informationBut this argument has no force if Christ died for all without exception, for one as much as for another, which He must have done if He made salvation
1 LIMITED ATONEMENT Preached September 30, 1958, by Pastor Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church, Topeka, Kansas My subject again today is the Particular Atonement, or the Limited Design in the Atonement.
More informationWhat Must I Do to be Saved?
What Must I Do to be Saved? Introduction In my view, one of the most important theological questions, in all of Christianity, is as follows: What, exactly, do we need to do, in order to be saved? In other
More informationChapter 1 The Three Basic Rationales for the Study of Basic Doctrines
Chapter 1 The Three Basic Rationales for the Study of Basic Doctrines The first rationale for the study of doctrine is simply that God willed that the truth is needful and can be known. Christ gave a promise
More informationMike Riccardi Sundays in July July 9, 2017
Mike Riccardi Sundays in July July 9, 2017 Jesus paid the penalty for the sins of His people as a substitute for them. Surely our griefs He Himself bore, And our sorrows He carried; yet we ourselves esteemed
More informationIntroductory Remarks W. H. GROSS 8/31/2004
Introductory Remarks W. H. GROSS www.onthewing.org 8/31/2004 [This article espouses a point of view that claims to provide a revolution in Pauline Studies. 1 It claims that the Gospel does not include
More informationB. What the issue is: what is the intention of God in offering his Son as an atoning sacrifice?
Extent of the Atonement: Outline of The Issue, Positions, Key Texts, and Key Theological Arguments Bruce A. Ware Professor of Christian Theology The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary I. The Issue Regarding
More informationWill Everyone Be Saved? A Look at Universalism
Will Everyone Be Saved? A Look at Universalism In the spring of 2011, Pastor Rob Bell s book Love Wins hit the book stores, but the furor over the book started even before that. The charge was heresy.
More informationTuesday, July 14, 2015 Grace Impact Summer Family Bible Conference Inheritance
1 Tuesday, July 14, 2015 Grace Impact Summer Family Bible Conference Inheritance Greeting Greetings on behalf of the saints from Grace Life Bible Church in Grand Rapids, MI. As always it is an honor and
More informationDoes the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:
Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore I argue that Moore s famous response to the skeptic should be accepted even by the skeptic. My paper has three main stages. First, I will briefly outline G. E.
More informationARTICLE IV - DOCTRINE
ARTICLE IV - DOCTRINE ADOPTED: 03/04/2012 The Bible is God s special revelation of Himself so that we might know Him through His Son, Jesus Christ. In order to love God, learn of God and live for God,
More informationDORE CLEMENT DO THEISTS NEED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF EVIL?
Rel. Stud. 12, pp. 383-389 CLEMENT DORE Professor of Philosophy, Vanderbilt University DO THEISTS NEED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF EVIL? The problem of evil may be characterized as the problem of how precisely
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationSalvation Part 1 Article IV
1 Salvation Part 1 Article IV Salvation involves the redemption of the whole man, and is offered freely to all who accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour, who by His own blood obtained eternal redemption
More informationGolden Text: Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able (Luke 13:24).
Sunday, July 22, 2018 Lesson: Luke 13:22-30; Time of Action: 29 A.D.; Place of Action: Perea Golden Text: Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall
More informationEvidential arguments from evil
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48: 1 10, 2000. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Evidential arguments from evil RICHARD OTTE University of California at Santa
More informationTHE LETTER TO THE ROMANS PART II LAW AND GRACE, LIVING AS CHILDREN OF GOD
THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS PART II LAW AND GRACE, LIVING AS CHILDREN OF GOD I. Chapters 3 through 7 raise and then respond to various objections that could be made against the notion of salvation by grace
More informationKarl Barth and Neoorthodoxy
Karl Barth and Neoorthodoxy CH512 LESSON 17 of 24 Lubbertus Oostendorp, ThD Experience: Professor of Bible and Theology, Reformed Bible College, Kuyper College We turn today to Barth s teaching of election.
More informationCornerstone Bible Church Another Road to Salvation (Romans 3:21 31) Survey of Romans part 10
Cornerstone Bible Church Another Road to Salvation (Romans 3:21 31) Survey of Romans part 10 Edwin Gonzalez July 16, 2017 Introduction: All roads lead to Rome All religions pursue the same goals It doesn
More information6. Does Water Baptism Replace Circumcision?
Bible Doctrines: Baptism 6. Does Water Baptism Replace Circumcision? By Dr. Paul M. Elliott From the TeachingtheWord Bible Knowledgebase Part 6 of a series. Read part 5. The position on baptism presented
More informationTruths of the Reformation (5) Christ Alone
Truths of the Reformation (5) Christ Alone October 15, 2017 Rev. Jerry Hamstra Our subject this morning is another of the 5 solas of the Reformation, Christ Alone. So far, we have looked at Scripture Alone,
More informationStem Cell Research on Embryonic Persons is Just
Stem Cell Research on Embryonic Persons is Just Abstract: I argue that embryonic stem cell research is fair to the embryo even on the assumption that the embryo has attained full personhood and an attendant
More informationPerseverance Of The Saints
Perseverance Of The Saints Introduction. Many sincere religious people believe that once a sinner has been redeemed by Christ, it is impossible for him to so sin as to fall from the grace of God and be
More informationJUSTIFICATION, JUDGMENT AND THE JUDGE
Justification, Judgment and the Judge 1 JUSTIFICATION, JUDGMENT AND THE JUDGE Introduction: We have mentioned the impact of the Reformation which was credited with a beginning in 1517 when Martin Luther
More informationlesson five the saving righteousness of God Romans 3:21 31
lesson five the saving righteousness of God Romans 3:21 31 Memory Verse: For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came
More informationSemantic Values? Alex Byrne, MIT
For PPR symposium on The Grammar of Meaning Semantic Values? Alex Byrne, MIT Lance and Hawthorne have served up a large, rich and argument-stuffed book which has much to teach us about central issues in
More informationPhilosophy of Religion 21: (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas
Philosophy of Religion 21:161-169 (1987).,, 9 Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht - Printed in the Nethenanas A defense of middle knowledge RICHARD OTTE Cowell College, University of Calfiornia, Santa Cruz,
More informationSanta Rosa Bible Church Doctrinal Statement
Section 1: Preamble Santa Rosa Bible Church Doctrinal Statement We believe the Bible as the ultimate authority over our lives. As a result, we trust that true Christian unity only comes about by holding
More informationA Quiz on the Doctrine of the Atonement
A Quiz on the Doctrine of the Atonement The cross of Christ stands at the very center of the Christian faith, for without what Christ accomplished there, we would be utterly lost. He himself bore our sins
More informationParticular redemption
Particular redemption In two previous articles, I introduced the Canons of Dort and considered the "first main point of doctrine," unconditional election. In this article we turn to the second, and perhaps
More informationEternal Security and Exegetical Overview of Hebrews
Eternal Security and Exegetical Overview of Hebrews An Attempt to Move the Issue from Prooftexting to Texts which Sustain the Argument Introduction to the TheologicalDebate For 500 years, much of evangelical
More informationIs Universal Salvation Explicitly Taught in the New Testament?
Is Universal Salvation Explicitly Taught in the New Testament? Part 2: Aionios Eternal, Age-abiding or Both? By Gerry Watts November 2013 Aionios, Aion & Olam: the Technicalities One of the major issues
More informationWEEK 3 IMPUTATION OF SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS ROMANS 3:21-4:25
1 WEEK 3 IMPUTATION OF SIN AND RIGHTEOUSNESS Justification: a legal sentence or declaration issued by God in which He pronounces the person in question free from any fault or guilt and acceptable in His
More informationMembership Covenant. Our mission is to See, Savor, and Share the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Membership Covenant The vision of Sojourn Church is to follow Jesus Christ with Faith and Obedience and respond to his grace as agents of his redemption for the glory of God and the making of disciples
More informationChristians have no idea of many of the doctrines of the Christian religion, and are
Book Report: The Atonement by Gordon H. Clark Gordon Clark s book The Atonement attempts to not only explain but persuade the reader of the nature and extent of the atonement. Clark notes that a vast majority
More informationIS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?''
IS GOD "SIGNIFICANTLY FREE?'' Wesley Morriston In an impressive series of books and articles, Alvin Plantinga has developed challenging new versions of two much discussed pieces of philosophical theology:
More informationOn A New Cosmological Argument
On A New Cosmological Argument Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss A New Cosmological Argument, Religious Studies 35, 1999, pp.461 76 present a cosmological argument which they claim is an improvement over
More informationPaul has made his case that the Christian faith stands or falls based upon whether or not Jesus Christ
For He Must Reign The Thirtieth in a Series of Sermons on Paul s First Letter to the Corinthians Texts: 1 Corinthians: 15:20-28; Job 19:23-29 Paul has made his case that the Christian faith stands or falls
More informationPerseverance Of The Saints
Perseverance Of The Saints Introduction. Many sincere people believe that once a sinner has been saved, it is impossible for them to be eternally lost. Anyone who accepts Calvinism can understand why once
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationCERTAINTY CONFERENCE The Biblical View of Salvation
1 2 3 4 CERTAINTY CONFERENCE The Biblical View of Salvation March 15-18, 2015 FBC New Philadelphia, OH INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW OF CALVINISM Reformed Theology Historical Designation Calvinism Philosophical
More informationSALVATION AND SECURITY
Other Studies Available at www.drnichols.org STUDIES IN DOCTRINES SALVATION AND SECURITY Ed Nichols Copyright 1997 by Ed Nichols CONTENT SALVATION DOCTRINE OF ELECTION THE CROSS SOTERIOLOGY TERMS RIGHTEOUSNESS
More informationPresuppositions of Biblical Interpretation
C H A P T E R O N E Presuppositions of Biblical Interpretation General Approaches The basic presupposition about the Bible that distinguishes believers from unbelievers is that the Bible is God s revelation
More information"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature."
SPECIAL STUDIES NUMBER NINE Colossians 1:15-17 Colossians 1:15 reads as follows: "Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature." The "Who" of this text is the one of whom we read
More informationA PRAYER FOR SANCTIFICATION
Series on The Prayers of the Apostle Paul Sermon #5 1 Thessalonians 5:23-24 June 11, 1995 A PRAYER FOR SANCTIFICATION L. Dwight Custis We are looking at the prayers of the Apostle Paul as they are recorded
More informationWhat is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: Who Are Atheists? What Do Atheists Believe?:
1 What is Atheism? How is Atheism Defined?: The more common understanding of atheism among atheists is "not believing in any gods." No claims or denials are made - an atheist is any person who is not a
More informationALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI
ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI Michael HUEMER ABSTRACT: I address Moti Mizrahi s objections to my use of the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservatism (PC). Mizrahi contends
More informationChapter 2: Assurance. Foundations: Bible Truths For Christian Growth
Foundations: Bible Truths For Christian Growth Chapter 2: Assurance FOUNDATIONS: BIBLE TRUTHS FOR CHRISTIAN GROWTH. Chapter 2: Assurance, 2011 Grace Church of Mentor. All rights reserved. For information
More informationA SOLUTION TO FORRESTER'S PARADOX OF GENTLE MURDER*
162 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY cial or political order, without this second-order dilemma of who is to do the ordering and how. This is not to claim that A2 is a sufficient condition for solving the world's
More informationDoctrinal Statement of Grace Chapel Castle Rock
Doctrinal Statement of Grace Chapel Castle Rock I. CONCERNING THE HOLY SCRIPTURES We believe that the Scriptures (Old and New Testaments) are the inerrant Word of God. We believe in the verbal, plenary
More informationVIII. The Atonement of Christ
VIII. The Atonement of Christ Date: July 20, 2013 Sola: Solus Christus Aim: To understand how Christ achieves atonement for His people. A. Christ, The Mediator The New Testament emphatically affirms that
More informationJohn s Fantastic Revelation
John s Fantastic Revelation John s teaching on the fruits of regeneration and on sin The Book of 1 John provides much important Biblical teaching on sin and the fruits of being born-again or becoming a
More informationGenesis 1:1,26; Matthew 28:19; Mark 1:9-11; John 1:1,3; 4:24; 5:26; Romans 1:19,20; 9:5, Ephesians 1:13; 4:5,6; Colossians 2:9
Statement of Faith 1 The Word of God We accept the Bible, including the 39 books of the Old Testament and the 27 books of the New Testament, as the written Word of God. The Bible is an essential and infallible
More informationDetailed Statement of Faith Of Grace Community Bible Church
Detailed Statement of Faith Of Grace Community Bible Church THE HOLY SCRIPTURES We believe that the Bible is God s written revelation to man, and thus the 66 books of the Bible given to us by the Holy
More informationContents. Course Directions 4. Outline of Romans 7. Outline of Lessons 8. Lessons Recommended Reading 156
Contents Course Directions 4 Outline of Romans 7 Outline of Lessons 8 Lessons 1-12 11 Recommended Reading 156 Questions for Review and Final Test 157 Form for Assignment Record 169 Form for Requesting
More informationTHE ANALYSIS OF EPISTLES. Analyzing the Epistles by. Understanding. Their Literary Structure
Dr. Charles P. Baylis 12.13.15 THE ANALYSIS OF EPISTLES Analyzing the Epistles by Understanding Their Literary Structure 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION: THE BIBLICAL STORY AND EPISTLES
More informationImmanuel Baptist Church Membership Covenant
1 Immanuel Baptist Church Membership Covenant The Immanuel Baptist Church membership covenant was created out of a desire to inform and equip members of IBC as to their responsibilities to the church and
More informationUnconditional Election
Unconditional Election Introduction. Unconditional election is a fancy phrase that refers to what is commonly known as Predestination. Predestinate comes from proorizo which is translated three different
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationJohn 15: The Shepherd and the sheep
Choosing A Local Church 1 Choosing A Local Church And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but
More informationLighthouse Community Church Body Life 2017
Lighthouse Statement of Belief The Nature of God We believe that there is one God, the Creator of all things, eternally existing in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three
More informationIN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE
IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE By RICHARD FELDMAN Closure principles for epistemic justification hold that one is justified in believing the logical consequences, perhaps of a specified sort,
More informationIf people are dead in sin, and the message of Christ crucified comes to them as either foolishness or a
The Spirit of God The Fifth in a Series of Sermons on Paul s First Letter to the Corinthians Texts: 1 Corinthians 2:6-16; Isaiah 64:1-7 If people are dead in sin, and the message of Christ crucified comes
More informationCan Christianity be Reduced to Morality? Ted Di Maria, Philosophy, Gonzaga University Gonzaga Socratic Club, April 18, 2008
Can Christianity be Reduced to Morality? Ted Di Maria, Philosophy, Gonzaga University Gonzaga Socratic Club, April 18, 2008 As one of the world s great religions, Christianity has been one of the supreme
More informationVolume The Security of the Believer Dr. David E. Luethy
www.preciousheart.net/ti Volume 1 2005-2007 The Security of the Believer Dr. David E. Luethy A. Definition of Eternal Security B. Proof for this Doctrine C. Objections to this Doctrine Works Cited A. Definition
More informationHermeneutics for Synoptic Exegesis by Dan Fabricatore
Hermeneutics for Synoptic Exegesis by Dan Fabricatore Introduction Arriving at a set of hermeneutical guidelines for the exegesis of the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke poses many problems.
More informationIS THERE SALVATION AFTER DEATH? THE ANSWER TO POSTMORTEM EVANGELISM (Part Three in a three part series on the place of Jesus in salvation)
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE P.O. Box 7000, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Feature Article: JAJ773 IS THERE SALVATION AFTER DEATH? THE ANSWER TO POSTMORTEM EVANGELISM (Part Three in a three part series
More information100 BIBLE LESSONS LESSON 42 FAITH AND WORKS
100 BIBLE LESSONS Give these lessons to people you visit, youth groups, hospital patients, church visitors and new members. Use them in Sunday School, bus ministry, jail services, nursing homes, Christian
More informationPeople of Mars Hill. Statement of Faith
People of Mars Hill www.pomh.org Statement of Faith ARTICLE I: NAME 1.100 People of Mars Hill ARTICLE II: PURPOSE 2.100 The People of Mars Hill exists to present Jesus in such a way that lives are transformed,
More informationThe Prison Epistles - EPHESIANS INTRODUCTION
he Prison Epistles - EPHESIANS INRODUCION his Home Bible Study Guide is the first of a series on what are called the Prison Epistles: Philemon, Colossians, Ephesians and Philippians. hese were all written
More informationWhat does the Bible Really teach about the Cross?
What does the Bible Really teach about the Cross? Study Notes by Stuart Olyott Know Your Bible Recordings (2014) - Free for non-profit use 1 What does the Bible really teach about the Cross? Table of Contents
More informationCajetan, On Faith and Works (1532)
1 Cajetan, On Faith and Works (1532) Of the many Roman Catholic theologians who took up the pen against Luther, Cardinal Cajetan (1468 1534) ranks among the best. This Thomist, who had met with Luther
More informationA Quiz on the Doctrine of Salvation
A Quiz on the Doctrine of Salvation At the heart of the Christian faith is this statement: God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). Christians are
More informationRehoboth C. ASSOCIATION FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC. Operating Rehoboth Christian College. Rehoboth Distinctives
Series Rob Geijsma Rehoboth C ASSOCIATION FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC. Operating Rehoboth Christian College Rehoboth Distinctives REHOBOTH DISTINCTIVES PART ONE Not all schools are the same. Even among
More informationI. The first main idea: Paul affirms the purpose of the oracle of Jacob s election to salvation
Paul on the Oracle of Jacob s Election to Salvation (Gen 25.19-34 in Rom 9.10-18) WestminsterReformedChurch.org Pastor Ostella June 28, 2015 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children
More informationEPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES
EPISTEMOLOGY for DUMMIES Cary Cook 2008 Epistemology doesn t help us know much more than we would have known if we had never heard of it. But it does force us to admit that we don t know some of the things
More informationJesus the Christ, our Lord
Jesus the Christ, our Lord 1 Corinthians 15:20-23 Jesus is the second Adam. 42-49 As we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the image of the heavenly. Romans 5:6-9 More than being justified,
More informationA SCRIPTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE FATE OF THE UNEVANGELIZED:
A SCRIPTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE FATE OF THE UNEVANGELIZED: PARTICULARISM VS. INCLUSIVISM Kevin K. Haah Theological Challenges of Religious Plurality Spring 2002 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to
More informationSharing the Gospel with Children
Sharing the Gospel with Children Key Biblical and Theological Convictions of Village Table of Contents Sharing the Gospel with Children... 1 Common Pitfalls in Sharing the Gospel with Children... 2 Oversimplifying
More informationTo Be Like Jesus. A Study for Children on Following Jesus. To Be Like Jesus
To Be Like Jesus Intended Use: Sunday School Lessons: 40 ESV To Be Like Jesus A Study for Children on Following Jesus To Be Like Jesus answers important questions about salvation and sanctification by
More informationComments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions
Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions Christopher Menzel Texas A&M University March 16, 2008 Since Arthur Prior first made us aware of the issue, a lot of philosophical thought has gone into
More informationDOCTRINAL STATEMENT OF GRACE BIBLE CHURCH
The Holy Scriptures: DOCTRINAL STATEMENT OF GRACE BIBLE CHURCH We believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the verbally inspired Word of God, the final authority for faith and life,
More informationThe Extent of the Atonement HISTORICAL CHALLENGES
The Extent of the Atonement HISTORICAL CHALLENGES Arminianism and the Canons of Dort 1571 Creation of the Belgic Confession and Heidelberg Catechism 1581 Netherlands gains independence from Spain 1602
More informationv.19 - READ: "For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him,"
Sermon or Lesson: Colossians 1:19-20, with Philippians 2:6-8 (NIV based) [Lesson Questions included] TITLE: Jesus - The Fullness Of God Through Which Is Available Reconciliation To God READ: Colossians
More informationA Response to David Chen, Has Francis Turretin been faithful to John Calvin s Doctrine of Election?
A Response to David Chen, Has Francis Turretin been faithful to John Calvin s Doctrine of Election? Alex Shao Kai Tseng A very fine paper on Turretin s doctrine of predestination has been written, owing
More information1 Job 1:13-22; Luke 13:1-5
1 Job 1:13-22; Luke 13:1-5 Why does God allow suffering? Purpose: To explore the issue of suffering 1. Do you, or others that you have spoken to, find it hard to reconcile a loving God with the suffering
More informationThe Completeness of the Scriptures
This very important subject must precede the detail study of any scriptures. Most of the confusion about many Bible verses results from the practice of using non scriptural information as determining factors
More informationSeries Revelation. Scripture #29 Revelation 19:1-9
Series Revelation Scripture #29 Revelation 19:1-9 We ve known from the beginning of our study that the outcome of the book of Revelation is The Victory of Jesus and His Followers Over Satan and His Helpers.
More informationPHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
More informationTherefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:
International Sunday School Lesson Study Notes July 24, 2016 Lesson Text: Romans 5:1-11 Lesson Title: Not Without Hope Introduction One of the saddest descriptions of sinful man is found in Paul s words
More informationThe Church of the Servant King
The Church of the Servant King www.cotsk.org Survey of the Bible Series Paul s First Letter to the Thessalonians (SB_1Thess_Lsn2_Chap1) THE GREETING (1:1) Paul and Silvanus and Timothy to the church of
More informationFirst Calvary Baptist Church Statement of Faith
First Calvary Baptist Church Statement of Faith I. Scripture a. We believe the Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine
More informationMembership Covenant. The Village Church Denton exists to glorify God by being and making disciples of Jesus Christ.
Membership Covenant The Village Church Denton exists to glorify God by being and making disciples of Jesus Christ. The Village Church Denton Membership Covenant is birthed out of our love for the church
More information