WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF
|
|
- Vivien Miles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF 301 CLASS: PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS BY PROFESSOR JOE WYROSTEK 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 (NIV), 10 I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought. 11 My brothers and sisters, some from Chloe s household have informed me that there are quarrels among you. 12 What I mean is this: One of you says, I follow Paul; another, I follow Apollos; another, I follow Cephas; still another, I follow Christ. 13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I did not baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius, 15 so no one can say that you were baptized in my name. 16 (Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don t remember if I baptized anyone else.) 17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power. I. THREE FORMS OF APOLOGETICS 1. Proof: Presenting a rational basis for faith or proving Christianity to be true. Jesus and the apostles often offered evidence to people who had difficulty believing that the gospel was true. Note John 14:11; 20:24 31; 1 Cor. 15:1 11. Believers themselves sometimes doubt, and at that point apologetics becomes useful for them even apart from its role in dialogue with unbelievers. That is to say, apologetics confronts unbelief in the believer as well as in the unbeliever. (pp. 1-2, loc. 918). 2. Defense: Apologetics as defense: answering the objections of unbelief. Paul describes his mission as defending and confirming the gospel (Phil. 1:7 NIV; cf. v. 16). Confirming may refer to number 1 above, but defending is more specifically focused on giving answers to objections. Much of Paul s writing in the New Testament is apologetic in this sense. Think of how many times he responds to imaginary (or real) objectors in his letter to the Romans. Think of how often Jesus deals with the objections of religious leaders in the Gospel of John. (p. 2, loc. 938). 3. Offense: Attacking the foolishness of unbelieving thought (Ps. 14:1; 1 Cor. 1:18 2:16). In view of the importance of number 2, it is not surprising that some will define apologetics as the defense of the faith. 22 But that definition can be misleading. God calls his people not only to answer the objections of unbelievers, but also to go on the attack against falsehood. 1
2 Paul says, We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ (2 Cor. 10:5). Non-Christian thinking is folly (ESV), or foolishness (NIV), according to Scripture (1 Cor. 1:18 2:16; 3:18 23), and one function of apologetics is to expose that foolishness for what it is. (p. 2, loc. 938). II. THREE BASIC APPROACHES TO CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS 1. Presuppositional (no neutral ground, only God can make sense of reason and existence): is a school of Christian apologetics that believes the Christian faith is the only basis for rational thought. It presupposes that the Bible is divine revelation and attempts to expose flaws in other worldviews. It claims that apart from presuppositions, one could not make sense of any human experience, and there can be no set of neutral assumptions from which to reason with a non-christian. Presuppositionalists claim that a Christian cannot consistently declare their belief in the necessary existence of the God of the Bible and simultaneously argue on the basis of a different set of assumptions that God may not exist and Biblical revelation may not be true. Two schools of presuppositionalism exist, based on the different teachings of Cornelius Van Til and Gordon Haddon Clark. Presuppositionalism contrasts with classical apologetics and evidential apologetics (wiki). a. Differences between Van Til and Clark, b. Helpful video on the differences, c. Example of presuppositional apologetics with Bahnsen and Tabash, 2. Classical (reasonable arguments points to Jesus): is the dominant approach to apologetics in church history, especially prior to the modern period. It emphasizes the presentation of Christianity as rational as logically coherent and supportable by sound arguments and offers what its advocates consider proofs of various types (though especially philosophical proofs) for the existence of God as a first step in defending the truth claims of the Christian faith (Bible.org) a. Source for info above and more study, b. Example of classical apologetics with William Lane Craig versus Christopher Hitchens, 3. Evidential (God given facts lead to truth): is an approach to Christian apologetics emphasizing the use of evidence to demonstrate that God exists. The evidence is supposed to be evidence both the believer and nonbeliever share, that is to say one need not presuppose God's existence. Evidential apologetics is not necessarily evidentialism, however many associate them as the same. Evidential apologetics method looks at the New Testament's historical documents first, then upon to the Jesus' miracles in particular the 2
3 resurrection which evidentialists believe points to Jesus Christ as the Son of God. Some of the top supporters of this method include Gary R. Habermas, John W. Montgomery, Clark Pinnock, and Wolfhart Pannenberg (wiki). a. Example of the evidential approach with Gary Habermas versus Anthony Flew, b. More on evidentialism, III. FAITH, SCRIPTURE & EVIDENCE 1. Faith: is not mere rational thought, but it is not irrational either. It is not belief in the absence of evidence ; rather, it is a trust that rests on sufficient evidence. This fact is evident in Scripture. Abraham s willingness to sacrifice his son Isaac (Gen. 22) is often presented as an example of a faith that contravenes moral and rational norms. But this analysis often fails to take account of the fact that Abraham had a very firm basis for doing what he did namely, the command of God. (p. 53, loc. 1865). 2. Scripture: What God says can be neither irrational nor immoral, for his Word defines rationality and morality for us. When God tells us to do something, we need no greater rational basis for doing it. So faith does not believe despite the absence of evidence; rather, faith honors God s Word as sufficient evidence. Romans 4:20 21 describes Abraham s faith always in the New Testament a model of Christian faith as follows: No distrust made him waver concerning the promise of God, but he grew strong in his faith as he gave glory to God, fully convinced that God was able to do what he had promised. (p. 53, loc. 1872). 3. Evidence: The ultimate proof, the ultimate evidence, is the Word of God.106 Eyewitnesses are important, but they die, and memories of them fade. Only if their testimony is preserved in God s written Word will that testimony have continuing value down through the history of the world. To trust God s Word as ultimate evidence is not to deny the importance of reasons. God does not always reveal the reasons for what he says and does, but as a wise, true, and faithful God, and as the very standard of rationality, he always has a reason of that we may be confident. Often he does reveal his reasons to us. Abraham knew that God had a reason for commanding him to sacrifice his son, even though that reason was hidden at first. (p. 54, loc. 1887). IV. UNDERSTANDING PROOF IN PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS 1. Proof: Cornelius Van Til says that there is absolutely certain proof for the existence of God and the truth of Christian theism. He continues: The Reformed apologist maintains that there is an absolutely valid argument for the existence of God and for the truth of Christian theism. He cannot do less without virtually admitting that God s revelation to man is not clear. It is fatal for the Reformed apologist to admit that man has done justice to the objective evidence if he comes to any other conclusion than that of the truth of Christian theism. (p. 56, loc. 1921). 3
4 2. Example Argument from Scripture that Proves God s Existence: a. Premise 1: What Scripture says is always true. b. Premise 2: Scripture says that God exists. c. Conclusion: Therefore, God exists. (p. 56, loc. 1921). 3. Not All Proof is Effective to Non-believers: But there is something lacking here. Practically speaking, we would not be likely to use this proof in our witness to non-christians. Most intelligent unbelievers today would dismiss it simply by denying the biblical authority on which it is based. The circle is too narrow.112 In one sense, the problem is not with the proof, but with the unbeliever: he ought to accept biblical authority, and therefore he ought to accept our proof. But of course he doesn t. (p. 57, loc. 1941). 4. To Use or Not to Use Proofs Based on Effectiveness with Unbelievers: Ultimately, the only cure for repression is the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, as we construct arguments, we have little idea of what sort of argument will be persuasive to any particular individual or audience. No argument is guaranteed to be persuasive to all people. Not even arguments from Scripture alone are guaranteed in that way, though we know from the discussion above that they are pleasing to God. (p. 57, loc. 1941). 5. Proof, What Ought to Persuade: Perhaps we can remedy the situation by defining proof as that which ought to persuade, rather than as something that actually persuades. But this definition brings us back to the narrowly circular proof that we originally considered. The unbeliever ought to accept that proof together with the scriptural authority it presupposes. As a matter of fact, he ought to believe in God without any such argument at all, simply on the basis of God s revelation in creation (Rom. 1:18 21, again). If our task is simply to put the unbeliever into a position in which he ought to believe, then we are best advised to do nothing, for he is in that position already. I think it is right to define proof as that which ought to persuade. (p. 58, loc. 1958). V. THE NEED FOR PROOF IN PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS 1. Basic Beliefs: In one sense, not everybody needs a theistic proof. Some people, such as W. K. Clifford, have said that it is wrong to believe anything without evidence. But that initially plausible view has been effectively countered in our time by philosophers Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff. They point out that we believe many things that we cannot necessarily prove. That other persons have minds like mine, for example, is a very difficult proposition to prove to someone disposed to challenge it. Or take my belief that Violet Frame is truly my mother, or my belief that my wife really loves me, or my belief that = 4. Such basic beliefs (as Plantinga calls them) are easy to accept as being obviously true, especially when alleged proofs for them are complicated and hard to follow. (pp , loc. 1982). 2. Fools & Proof: But as we have seen, it is possible to go beyond these general recommendations and produce specific arguments for God s existence. A wise man does not 4
5 really need these; they are for fools. But God is very patient and gracious with such fools as we all once were. Once we get beyond simply pointing the unbeliever to the creation and the statements of Scripture, proof becomes a fairly complicated matter. Since everything is created and directed by God, nothing may be properly understood apart from him. That means that any fact may become the focal point for an apologetic; the apologist may show how that fact derives its intelligibility from God. We may use a wide variety of approaches and methods, consistent with our overall presuppositional commitment. Since proof is person-variable, we are particularly interested in choosing an argumentative approach that makes contact with the individual or group we are talking to. That decision is not an easy one. (p. 61, loc. 2021). 3. Example Proof for Non-Fools: a. Premise 1: If Jesus is Lord and Savior, then he is reliable. b. Premise 2: If he is reliable, then God exists. c. Premise 3: He is Lord and Savior. d. Conclusion: Therefore, God exists. (p. 61, loc. 2044). 4. Point of Contact: When we encounter people who are foolish in the biblical sense, not excepting the claims of the Bible because they are suppressing the truth of God in wickedness, we should offer them a rebuke and then the proof of God in the form of showing them the absurdity of their position. We do this in gentleness and respect, praying that the Holy Spirit will convict them of their sin and unbelief. VI. REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. List and describe the three forms of apologetics. 2. List and describe the three main methods of Christian apologetics. 3. Describe how presuppositional apologists understand faith, Scripture and evidence. 4. What is a good definition of proof? 5. Why are proofs rejected by non-believers according to Romans 1:18? 6. What is a basic belief? 7. How should presuppositionalists use proof? 5
Presuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationCataloging Apologetic Systems. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.
Cataloging Apologetic Systems Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural
More informationApologetic Method. Jacob D. Hantla
Apologetic Method Jacob D. Hantla Reformed Theological Seminary, Virtual Campus Christian Apologetics Professor, Dr. John M. Frame June 2008 Apologetic Method 2 Table of Contents The Apologist... 3 Apologetic
More informationMidway Community Church "Hot Topics" Young Earth Presuppositionalism: Handout 1 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.
Midway Community Church "Hot Topics" 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. I. First Things A. While perhaps most Christians will understand something about how the expression 'young earth' is used (especially with
More information11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.
Sunday School Lesson for June 4, 2006 Released on June 1, 2006 "Servants of Unity" Printed Text: 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 Background Scripture: 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 Devotional Reading: 1 Corinthians 1:2-9
More informationReformation. &",evival. A Quarterly Journal for Church Leadership
Reformation &",evival A Quarterly Journal for Church Leadership Volume 6, Number 3 Summer 1997 Gregg Strawbridge But for all his repeated mention of the Kingdom of God, Jesus never once paused to define
More information1 Corinthians 1 in ASL
1 1 Corinthians, Chapter 1. This letter is from Paul, chosen by the will of God to be an apostle of Christ Jesus, and from our brother Sosthenes. Verse 2. I am writing to God's church in Corinth, to you
More informationMixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9:
Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 01.23.13 Francis Schaeffer I do not believe there is any one apologetic which meets the needs of all people. And,
More informationTYPES OF APOLOGETICS. Psalms 19; Romans 1
TYPES OF APOLOGETICS Psalms 19; Romans 1 WAYS GOD REVEALS HIMSELF! General Revelation Creation - Psalms 19; Romans 1 Conscience - Romans 2:12-16 Why do so many reject this message? (Romans 1:21-ff) Imaginations
More informationQuestions About Baptism Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. Ephesians 5:17 ESV
Questions About Baptism Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. Ephesians 5:17 ESV If baptism is essential... Why isn't baptism mentioned every place the gospel is? (17)
More informationFacing Tough Questions: Defending the Faith
CPC School of Discipleship Fall 2018, Missionary Encounters with Our Neighbors Week 5 Facing Tough Questions: Defending the Faith Opening Questions When do you feel the most insecure about talking about
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS
#331 Theology 5: Apologetics and Ethics Western Reformed Seminary (www.wrs.edu) John A. Battle, Th.D. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS Apologetics defined English dictionary definition (Webster) Apology...
More informationAccording to 1 Corinthians 1:1, what was Paul called to be? According to 1 Corinthians 1:1, who was Sosthenes?
According to 1 Corinthians 1:1, who was called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ? According to 1 Corinthians 1:1, what was Paul called to be? (2 pts) According to 1 Corinthians 1:1, how was Paul called
More informationClassical Presuppositional Apologetics: Re-introducing an Old Theme
Classical Presuppositional Apologetics: Re-introducing an Old Theme E. Calvin Beisner Associate Professor Knox Theological Seminary AP 506, Apologetics September 28, 2001 Revised January 14, 2006 Introduction
More informationTrue and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs
True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs Dr. Richard Spencer June, 2015 Our Purpose Theistic proofs and other evidence help to solidify our faith by confirming that Christianity is both true and reasonable.
More informationIn 2003, Mikel was ordained as a missionary by the Baptist General Conference and is a current member of the Evangelical Theological Society.
About Mikel Del Rosario - Mikel Del Rosario helps Christians defend the faith with confidence. He is an Apologetics professor specializing in making apologetics accessible to the church. He s taught for
More informationIntroduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th
Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th Instead, you must worship Christ as Lord of your life. And if someone asks about your Christian hope, always be ready to explain it. 1 Peter 3:15
More informationHOW TO ANSWER AN UNBELIEVER FROM SCRIPTURE By Sherry Cumby So you don t believe in God or the Bible as Scriptural truth? Why?
HOW TO ANSWER AN UNBELIEVER FROM SCRIPTURE By Sherry Cumby So you don t believe in God or the Bible as Scriptural truth? Why? The word of God is the ultimate authority of the Christian s worldview with
More informationSir Francis Bacon, Founder of the Scientific Method
There are two books laid before us to study, to prevent our falling into error; first, the volume of Scriptures, which revealed the will of God; then the volume of the Creatures, which expresses His power.
More informationFaith, Reason, or Both? or Man's Word? God's Word. Presuppositional vs. Classical Apologetics. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.
Faith, Reason, or Both? Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. or Man's Word? God's Word Presuppositional vs. Classical Apologetics Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. 1 Positions on the Theistic Arguments Perhaps not surprisingly,
More informationThe Existence of God
The Existence of God Introduction Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Southern Evangelical Seminary Past President, International Society of Christian Apologetics 1 Some Terms 2 Theism from the
More informationDefend Your Faith Lesson 1
Defend Your Faith Lesson 1 IS FAITH REASONABLE? but sanctify in your hearts Christ as Lord: being ready always to give answer to every man that asketh you a reason concerning the hope that is you, yet
More informationLECTURE 6: BIBLICAL APOLOGETICS PAUL IN HIS EPISTLES
LECTURE 6: BIBLICAL APOLOGETICS PAUL IN HIS EPISTLES In addition to his preaching and teaching recorded in Acts, Paul s letters provide insights into his methods of apologetics. In addition, they provide
More informationFive Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF
Five Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF The goal of apologetics is to persuasively answer honest objections that keep people from faith in Jesus Christ. But of several apologetic
More informationSermon preached by Pastor Ben Kuerth on 1 Corinthians 1 at Victory of the Lamb on June 26, 2016.
Sermon preached by Pastor Ben Kuerth on 1 Corinthians 1 at Victory of the Lamb on June 26, 2016. Series: 1 Corinthians a 21 st Century Church Today s Focus: A Church of Nobodies Your Savior Makes You a
More informationAn Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication
An Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication By Robin Barrett May 12, 2017 Contents Introduction...1 Defending the Methodology...2 The Transcendental Argument...13
More informationWho Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs?
Who Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs? Issue: Who has the burden of proof the Christian believer or the atheist? Whose position requires supporting
More informationMiracles. Miracles: What Are They?
Miracles Miracles: What Are They? Have you noticed how often the word miracle is used these days? Skin creams that make us look younger; computer technology; the transition of a nation from oppression
More informationType Question Answer Book Ch. Vs. CR According to 1 Corinthians chapter 1, our Sosthenes. 1 Cor 1 1
Type Question Answer Book Ch. Vs. CR According to 1 Corinthians chapter 1, our Sosthenes. 1 Cor 1 1 brother whom? CVR According to 1 Corinthians chapter 1 verse 1, An apostle. 1 Cor 1 1 called to be INT
More informationTHE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE
THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE JAMES M. GRIER, JR. INTRODUCTION P HILOSOPHY traditionally has handled the analysis of the origin of knowledge by making authority one of the four
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
Presuppositional Apologetics Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Revelation Augustine AD 354-AD 430 John Calvin 1509-1564 Abraham Kuyper
More information2. Intro: 1: The problem 1: Text: 1:17-2: ; 2-12; ; :17-2:2 (the counterpoint) 8.
2. Intro: 1:1-9 3. The problem 1:10-16 4. Text: 1:17-2:2 5. 1-13; 2-12; 3-11 6. 4-5 9-10; 6-7-8 7 1:17-2:2 (the counterpoint) 8. Pericles Introduction and Thanksgiving (I Cor 1:1-9) 1. Paul, called by
More informationOutline. The Resurrection Considered. Edwin Chong. Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate
The Resurrection Considered Edwin Chong July 22, 2007 Life@Faith 7-22-07 Outline Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate Life@Faith 7-22-07 2 1 Broader
More informationthis resource was printed from bethinking.org
bethinking this resource was printed from bethinking.org An Introduction to Christian Apologetics Paul Coulter Dr Paul Coulter has a background in medicine, and also holds degrees in theology and genetics.
More informationNo Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter
Forthcoming in Philosophia Christi 13:1 (2011) http://www.epsociety.org/philchristi/ No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter James N. Anderson David Reiter
More informationClassical Apologetics:
Classical Apologetics: It Stands to Reason Historical Roots of Classical Apologetics 1 Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy
More information1 Corinthians 1 7 Introduction
1 Corinthians 1 7 Introduction The church in Corinth dominates the landscape of the New Testament. 29 chapters are devoted to correspondence with this community, and we know from Paul s writings that there
More informationA Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework
RPM, Volume 12, Number 9, February 28 to March 6 2010 A Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework Jimmy Li Jimmy Li is an alumnus of University of California
More informationWhy Study Christian Evidences?
Chapter I Why Study Christian Evidences? Introduction The purpose of this book is to survey in systematic and comprehensive fashion the many infallible proofs of the unique truth and authority of biblical
More information1 Peter Series Lesson #090
1 Peter Series Lesson #090 May 11, 2017 Dean Bible Ministries www.deanbibleministries.org Dr. Robert L. Dean, Jr. GIVING AN ANSWER PART 8 OLD TESTAMENT: ELIJAH CONFRONTS PAGANISM 1 PETER 3:15; 1 KINGS
More informationThe Church of Christ and Unity
The Church of Christ and Unity Ephesians 4:1-6 J. W. Pitts, Jr. - Minister Woodland Park Church of Christ Unity Unity is very important to God There is unity between God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit, 1
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS
AN INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS It would be nice if all unbelievers were willing and eager to hear the gospel. It would be nice if all we had to do was tell them about Jesus, and they said something like,
More informationGod has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord
Basic Logic God has a mind- Romans 11:34 "who has known the mind of the Lord God thinks- Isaiah 55:9 as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my thoughts than (yours) Note: God does not have a
More informationFRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page i APOLOGETICS TO THE GLORY OF GOD
FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page i APOLOGETICS TO THE GLORY OF GOD FRAME, Apologetics_cxd cr pg:frame, Apologetics 11/26/08 12:58 PM Page ii FRAME, Apologetics_cxd
More informationA Critical Assessment of Cornelius Van Til Paul Cornford Introduction. Van Til s Apologetic Method Summarised
A Critical Assessment of Cornelius Van Til Paul Cornford 1994 [An address by Paul Cornford, Pastors and Elders Conference, Tamborine Mt., August 1994 ] Introduction Van Til s apologetical method is known
More informationLesson 1 - An Introduction
Lesson 1 - An Introduction 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing
More informationThaddeus M. Maharaj: Cornelius Van Til The Grandfather of Presuppositional Apologetics
Christian apologetics (the reasoned defense of our faith) can seem like a daunting and complicated task. There are so many arguments, methodologies and facts to master it is enough to drive many to frustration
More informationAncient Wisdom or Modern Foolishness
D Ancient Wisdom or Modern Foolishness Jeremiah 6:16; 8:8-9; 1 Corinthians 1:17-31 (texts) Rev. Nollie Malabuyo January 1, 2017 BSCC ear Congregation of Christ: On this first Lord's Day of the year 2017,
More informationDefending the Faith: The Importance of Contending for the Faith
Defending the Faith: The Importance of Contending for the Faith Should Christians defend the faith? Should we use reasons and evidences as we seek to persuade nonbelievers to believe? Why? What Biblical
More informationReasons We Don t Believe The Bible Isn t Trustworthy
March 18, 2018 College Park Church Reasons We Don t Believe The Bible Isn t Trustworthy 2 Peter 1:16-21 Mark Vroegop 16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power
More informationApologetics Defending the Faith
1 I. Introduction Apologetics Defending the Faith A. Apologetics: The branch of theology which seeks to provide a rational justification for the truth claims of the Christian faith and present Christian
More informationTHE TRUTH. It says in the Bible, There is no God
It says in the Bible, There is no God The whole passage says, Psalms 14:1 The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. It says in the Bible, (about the apostle Paul,) I thank God that I baptized none
More informationChristian Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Lecture III October 15,2015
Christian Apologetics Presuppositional Apologetics Lecture III October 15,2015 I. Presuppositions, everybody has them! A. Definition: A belief or theory which is assumed before the next step in logic is
More informationLecture overview. Christian Apologetics 20/02/2017. Apologetics across history. Class activity 2.1. Apologetics across history
Lecture overview Christian Apologetics PE 420/PE 620 bearing witness to the glory of God Apologetic High Points Across the Ages Apologetic Types and Strategies Verificationism as the Ideal Meta-Apologetic
More informationThe Defense of the Christian Faith By Gerald E. Cumby
1 The Defense of the Christian Faith By Gerald E. Cumby How to Answer an Unbeliever from Scripture: Using the Two-Step Apologetic Approach Note: Apologetics, simply defined, is the defense of the Christian
More informationThaddeus Maharaj Book Review: Greg L. Bahnsen - Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended
About Greg Bahnsen Greg L. Bahnsen became interested in apologetics by reading the writings of Cornelius Van Til in high school and would go on to develop his presuppositional apologetic. He was exceptionally
More informationFirst Corinthians. Paul the Apostle of Christ Claims Inspiration: 2:13; 11:23; 15:37 Place of Writing: Probably Ephesus Time of Writing: 53 54
1 First Corinthians Written by: Paul the Apostle of Christ Claims Inspiration: 2:13; 11:23; 15:37 Place of Writing: Probably Ephesus Time of Writing: 53 54 Written to: The Corinthian Church Origin of the
More informationThe Gospel Calls for Unity
SESSION TWO The Gospel Calls for Unity SESSION SUMMARY This session gives direction and truth to guide our hearts and conduct toward unity. Our unity must be grounded in biblical convictions, not popular
More informationTheistic Apologetics Dennis McCallum and Gary DeLashmutt
Theistic Apologetics Dennis McCallum and Gary DeLashmutt There are three major approaches to theistic apologetics in common use today. They are the Classical approach, the Evidentialist approach, and the
More informationJesus and the Inspiration of Scripture
Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture By Gary R. Habermas Central to a Christian world view is the conviction that Scripture, both the Old and New Testaments, comprises God's word to us. What sort of
More informationBasis of Assurance. Central Idea: Objectives:
Central Idea: The assurance of believers is based upon the certain knowledge of God revealed in creation and his mighty acts in history, upon the certainty of his promises, the vindication and resurrection
More informationA Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena
A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena 2017 by A Jacob W. Reinhardt, All Rights Reserved. Copyright holder grants permission to reduplicate article as long as it is not changed. Send further requests to
More informationA CASE FOR APOLOGETICS by Brian Auten What is Apologetics?
A CASE FOR APOLOGETICS by Brian Auten www.apologetics315.com What is Apologetics? The word apologetics comes from the Greek word apologia, which is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It can be
More informationAgainst Plantinga's A/C Model: Consequences of the Codependence of the De Jure and De Facto Questions. Rebeka Ferreira
1 Against Plantinga's A/C Model: Consequences of the Codependence of the De Jure and De Facto Questions Rebeka Ferreira San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Avenue Philosophy Department San Francisco,
More informationAsk and You Shall Receive:
Ask and You Shall Receive: Questions & Answers by Various CALVIN AND CALVINISM Q In the conclusion of Shawn Lazar s recent article, Cheap Grace or Cheap Law, he implied that Calvin denied faith alone in
More informationLiving Way Church Biblical Studies Program April 2013 God s Unfolding Revelation: An Introduction to Biblical Theology Lesson One
Living Way Church Biblical Studies Program April 2013 God s Unfolding Revelation: An Introduction to Biblical Theology Lesson One I. Introduction: Why Christians Should Be Concerned With Biblical Theology
More informationANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
Christian Apologetics Journal, 11:2 (Fall 2013) 2013 Southern Evangelical Seminary Reviews Norman L. Geisler, Ph.D. Reading the articles by Drs. Jason Lisle, Scott Oliphint, and Richard Howe was like watching
More informationTHE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD?
CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF6395 THE INTERNAL TESTIMONY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE BIBLE IS GOD S WORD? by James N. Anderson This
More informationModule 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality
Module M3: Can rational men and women be spiritual? Module 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality The New Atheists win again? Atheists like Richard Dawkins, along with other new atheists, have achieved high
More informationApologetics. by Johan D. Tangelder
Apologetics (Part 2 of 2) Scripture tells us that the Gospel message is foolishness to those who are perishing. But if that is true, if unbelievers will find the Gospel foolish, then how do we tell them
More information1 Corinthians 15:1-11
1 Now, brothers and sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. 2 By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word
More informationDivision August 19, 2018 Series, Gospel Community: Together in Unity 1 Corinthians 1:1-17
Division August 19, 2018 Series, Gospel Community: Together in Unity 1 Corinthians 1:1-17 I. Introduction A. Four mini-books 1. Living Together in Unity (division) 2. Living Together in Purity (sexual
More informationBe Ready to Defend! ; Eastside Pittsburgh Church. Scripture Reading: 1 Peter 3:13-17
Be Ready to Defend! 10-5-14; Eastside Pittsburgh Church Scripture Reading: 1 Peter 3:13-17 It was dangerous world to live in during the first century if you had faith in Jesus Christ. Peter in his first
More informationTOWARDS A REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY AND ITS EDUCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE JOHN GROSVENOR SHORTT. Ph D Thesis. University of London Institute of Education - 1 -
TOWARDS A REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY AND ITS EDUCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE JOHN GROSVENOR SHORTT Ph D Thesis University of London Institute of Education.. ( LONDIN. UNIV.,/ - 1 - Abstract of Thesis This thesis examines
More information1st and 2nd Corinthians Bible Quiz Questions
1st and 2nd Corinthians Bible Quiz Questions Covering Chicago Material 1 Corinthians Chapters 1 through 16 and 2 Corinthians Chapters 1, 2, 5 and 6 Questions by John Isett Copyright 2017 by World Bible
More informationAlvin Plantinga An Evaluation of Reformed Epistemology. Jessica Wagner Patrick Henry College
1 Alvin Plantinga An Evaluation of Reformed Epistemology Jessica Wagner Patrick Henry College Is there a God? How does one know God exists? What is the relationship between faith and reason? These are
More informationTraditional Apologetics. Van Til found seven problems in classical apologetics:
4. It compromises human creation as the image-bearer of God by conceptualizing human creation and knowledge as independent of the Being and knowledge of God. Human beings need not think God s thoughts
More informationBQF question set Corinthians 1-3 John Jude
BQF question set 2017-2018 1-2 Corinthians 1-3 John Jude 1 Corinthians 1:4 What do I give (to my God)? Thanks 1 Corinthians 1:4 To whom do I give thanks? My God 1 Corinthians 1:4 When do I give thanks
More informationSelect Bibliography on Apologetic Systems
Encyclopedias of Apologetics Select Bibliography on Apologetic Systems Campbell-Jack, W. C. and C. Stephen Evans, eds. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics. Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press,
More informationChristian Apologetics Defending the Faith REVIEW
Christian Apologetics Defending the Faith Session 4 How Do I Know God Exists? God s Attributes / The Trinity REVIEW What is Apologetics? A reasonable defense of the Christian faith 1 REVIEW What is Presuppositional
More informationThe problem of common ground in Christian apologetics: towards an integral approach Joongjae Lee
The problem of common ground in Christian apologetics: towards an integral approach Joongjae Lee 21272786 Thesis submitted for the degree Doctor Philosophiae in Philosophy at the Potchefstroom Campus of
More informationCornelius Van Til: An Analysis of his Thought Reviewed by W. Gary Crampton
THE TRINITY REVIEW For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare [are] not fleshly but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments
More informationTHE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik
THE MORAL ARGUMENT Peter van Inwagen Introduction, James Petrik THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSIONS of human freedom is closely intertwined with the history of philosophical discussions of moral responsibility.
More informationApologetics. (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other?
Apologetics by Johan D. Tangelder (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other? The need to defend Christianity against its accusers is as great
More informationA Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil
Volume 5, No. 1, April 2012 31 A Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil K. Dayton Hartman 1 At its core, the presuppositional response provided in this paper is incomplete. A robust presuppositional
More informationSpeak to the Dead: Presuppositionalism and the Proclamation of the Gospel Michael Riley Calvary Baptist Church of Wakefield, Michigan
Speak to the Dead: Presuppositionalism and the Proclamation of the Gospel Michael Riley Calvary Baptist Church of Wakefield, Michigan Credit where it is due: I didn t come up with the title of this session.
More informationThe Rationality of Religious Beliefs
The Rationality of Religious Beliefs Bryan Frances Think, 14 (2015), 109-117 Abstract: Many highly educated people think religious belief is irrational and unscientific. If you ask a philosopher, however,
More information7/2/2016. The Resurrection is all about Hope. The Resurrection. You Can Have Hope!
The Resurrection The Resurrection is all about Hope You Can Have Hope! 7/2/2016 But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason
More informationRighteousness Through Faith or Signs? Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O Neill
Righteousness Through Faith or Signs? Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O Neill Some of us aren t really absolutely sure of God s existence this morning, I know that. And some of us aren t sure why we have
More informationCommon Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics. by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 2 of 2
Common Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 2 of 2 Misconception #5: Van Til rejected the importance of logic, including the law of noncontradiction. Van Til never
More informationVan Til s Transcendental Argument Form and Theological and Biblical Basis
Van Til s Transcendental Argument Form and Theological and Biblical Basis Steve R. Scrivener 23 September 2009 Introduction and explanation In this paper I will give: (1) Key passages by Cornelius Van
More informationJanuary 22 A NEW UNITY IN MISSION AND VISION
January 22 A NEW UNITY IN MISSION AND VISION Pastor Ulmet: Primary passage: I Corinthians 1:10-18; Key thoughts: -Our unity must be in mind and purpose, i.e. Mission/Vision (Verse 10) -Christ cannot be
More informationBible Study on Christian Apologetics
1 Bible Study on Christian Apologetics First of six studies The basic principles of Christian apologetics may be summarized as follows: 1. Christian apologetics must be based on God s word. 2. Christian
More informationEphesians 1: 20 that he worked in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places,
THE Mystery of The ONE Body Part 6 http://biblos.com/ 1 Corinthians 4: 6 I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us NOT to go beyond what
More informationConfronting Unbelief of God s Promises. Romans 5:1 11
Confronting Unbelief of God s Promises Romans 5:1 11 Believed in the Lord The Word came to Abraham in a vision. Fear not, Abram, I am your shield; your reward shall be very great (Gen 15:1b). Abram responded
More informationETHICAL EGOISM. Brian Medlin. Introduction, H. Gene Blocker
ETHICAL EGOISM Brian Medlin Introduction, H. Gene Blocker IN THIS READING THE Australian philosopher Brian Medlin argues that ethical egoism is inconsistent. An individual egoist might believe in doing
More informationComunicación y Gerencia. The Challenge. Introduction to The Apologetics Ministry of Calvary Chapel Corona
Comunicación y Gerencia The Challenge Introduction to The Apologetics Ministry of Calvary Chapel Corona Outline Welcome & Introduction I. What is Apologetics? II. Apologetics & Evangelism III. Why is The
More informationBook Review #1 ON THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD 1 By St. Athanasius
1 Book Review #1 ON THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD 1 By St. Athanasius Regarding the reading of old books as opposed to modern one s, C.S. Lewis in his Introduction to Athanasius On The Incarnation wrote:
More informationThe Power of the Cross
The Power of the Cross Text: I Corinthians 1:10-2:5 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that
More informationBETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: PRESUPPOSITIONALISM, CIRCULAR REASONING, AND THE CHARGE OF FIDEISM. Joseph E. Torres
BETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: PRESUPPOSITIONALISM, CIRCULAR REASONING, AND THE CHARGE OF FIDEISM Joseph E. Torres Perhaps the single most common argument against the apologetic method of Cornelius Van
More information