CONCLUSION TO PART I
|
|
- Jemima Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 T CONCLUSION TO PART I he implication of our discussion in Part I concerning the nature of divine etemity is that the question of whether a tensed or a tenseless theory of time is correct is truly a watershed issue for the doctrine of divine etemity. Specifically whether tense and temporal becoming are objective features of reality will be determinative for whether it is possible for God to be unqualifiedly timeless. For example, some ofthe arguments for divine timelessness which we examined hinged upon one's presupposition of a tensed or tenseless theory oftime. The fourth argument-that if God is temporal in virtue of His knowledge of tensed facts, He is also spatial-amounted to an argument against a tensed theory of time. I indicated that partisans of tensed time who hold to divine atemporality must in response show either how God can know tensed facts without being drawn into time (and space) or why His ignorance of tensed facts does not impugn His omniscience. But in the last chapter we saw that this seems to be an impossible task. On the other hand, if the advocate of tensed time holds to divine temporality, he must explain why the existence of temporally tensed facts does not imply the existence of spatially ''tensed'' facts as weil or how a spaceless deity could know such facts. l Or again, the fifth argument-that only a timeless God could create two discrete time seriesended inconclusively, pending a discussion of creation on tensed and tenseless theories of time respectively. If our subsequent argument in chapter 3 was sound, we have now seen that a timeless deity could not in fact create two discrete time series if a tensed theory of time is correct, since such a deity could not even create one time series and remain timeless. The fifth argument therefore depends for its cogency upon the presupposition of a tenseless theory of time, on which the timeless creation of multiple time series becomes unproblematic. Or again, the thirteenth argument-that only a timeless God could be a perfect knower-seemed to backfrre on the atemporalist, for it left him with the task of explaining how a timeless God could know tensed facts about events in addition to the tenseless dates and temporal relations of events. We saw in the last chapter that this task seems hopeless, given a tensed theory of time. In our discussion of arguments for divine temporality, we found that the two most powerful arguments-the one based on God's creative action in the world and the other on God's omniscience-are sound only on the presupposition of a tensed theory of time. The proponent of tenseless time, who denies tensed facts and temporal becoming, eludes these arguments because God and the universe co-exist tenselessly and there just are no tensed facts to be known. -an issue I take up in my The Tensed Theory 0/ Time: a Critical Examination, Synthese Library (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000), chap
2 PART I: CONCLUSION 135 The doctrine of divine timelessness is thus, so far as we have seen, unobjectionable given a tenseless theory of time. In the absence of such objections, the argument from the imperfection arising from the transiency of temporal experience might well justify a doctrine of divine timelessness. How might such a theory look? Certainly not like the unintelligible Stump-Kretzmann model or the pseudo-scientific Leftow model; rather it would postulate the tenseless, or extrinsically timeless, existence of the four-dimensional world. Though extrinsically timeless, this tenselessly existing block universe is ordered along one of its dimensions by tenseless relations of earlier than, simultaneous with, and later than, akin to the tenseless relations less than, equal to, and greater than, so that it is intrinsically temporal. Temporal becoming is a subjective illusion of consciousness; all things/events simply exist tenselessly at their temporal locations. There is no objective distinction between past, present, and future, these predicates being subjective ways of relating things/events/moments to oneself. Similarly, tensed discourse and temporal indexicals are subjective forms of referring and relating to things/events/moments. Einstein's relativistic ether, while no reference frame, may nonetheless be conceived as God's "frame of reference" for the physical world. He and it may be imagined to co-exist in a fictitious higher dimensional space in which the four-dimensional block universe is embedded. All points in space, time, and space-time are equally real and accessible to Hirn; indeed, creation just is the tenseless, ontological dependence of this four-dimensional block and all its constituents on God. Though it never comes into nor passes out of being, it is nevertheless radically contingent in its existence. God knows all the temporal facts about the universe, what is happening (tenselessly) at every moment and every place. Since there really is no past, present, or future, God's knowledge oftenseless facts is exhaustive of all the facts there are, and His knowledge of the world may be conceived in terms oftenseless propositions describing the world. Given a tenseless theory of time we have no need of devices like ET -simultaneity or the Zero Thesis; God's timelessness in relation to the world becomes perspicuous. On the other hand, given a tensed theory of time, divine timelessness seems to be metaphysically impossible. A pure tensed theory enjoins an ontology of presentism, according to which only the present "slice" of space-time exists. Things come into and pass out of existence; events happen as they do; time elapses. The distinction between past, present, and future is real; the past no longer exists and the future does not yet exist, even tenselessly. Therefore, God cannot co-exist with any time but the present, for that is the only time there iso The universe does not merely depend upon God for its (present) existence; it was literally brought into being by God and subsequently sustained by Hirn. Tense is an objective feature of reality which is mirrored in our language. Therefore, there are tensed facts ab out what has happened, is happening, and will happen in the universe, which any omniscient being must know. Given a tensed theory of time, therefore, God's timeless existence is, as we have argued, metaphysically impossible. On a tensed theory oftime God's temporal existence is, however, unproblematic. God exists simultaneously with every time; that is to say, He existed in the past, exists in the present, and will exist in the future, so long as time shall last. He
3 136 PART I: CONCLUSION sustains every thing in existence at the moment of its being present and knows every present-tense truth at that same time. His activity and knowledge are thus constantly changing, but there is no reason to think that He is not therefore immutable in His perfection. Being omniscient, He will have complete knowledge of the past and of the future, in virtue of His knowledge of all tensed facts. Many interesting philosophical questions will remain to be answered concerning God's creation of time, the relation of God's time to physical time, and so forth, but the notion that God is temporal seems perspicuous on a tensed theory oftime. That leads us to wonder whether the tenseless theory is compatible with divine temporality. The tenseless theory accords so naturally with a doctrine of divine timelessness that it seems at first blush bizarre to suggest that God exists as a sort of one-dimensional string or world line. Though few have espoused such a view, a notable exception is D. H. Mellor, the most important contemporary defender of a tenseless view of time. In a remarkable article in the Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, Mellor tries to persuade theologians to adopt a tenseless theory of time. He declares, "Clearing our vision of time in this way is a good example of the service that true, i.e. analytic, philosophy can render to theology.,,2 According to Mellor the right way to think of a tenseless creation is not to think that God created a temporally extended world "all at once," for this would mean "at one time"; rather it is to think that God successively creates every thing at the time of its existence. "So God does create the world's contents successively, but not because anything is ever future and therefore does not then exist. Everything always exists, but because it is always spread out in time, so is its Creator.,,3 On this view God exists co-temporally with the products of creation in a B-series of moments. Such a view might seem to make God a part of the world, so that the question arises: what sustains the four-dimensional block consisting of God and the universe in existence? But Mellor insists that such a question is illicit. So long as God is other than and independent of His creation, God may be said to be "outside" the world and even "outside" time. Not that God exists in some sort of eternity, which Mellor characterizes as "problematic." Oddly, however, the problems Mellor mentions with respect to timeless eternity are the difflculties the doctrine faces if a tensed theory of time is true. He specifically notes the incoherence that arises from trying to reconcile God's timelessness with the traditional notion oftime's flow. He thinks that the doctrine of divine timelessness is motivated by adesire to exempt God from changes in His knowledge wrought by the flux of tensed facts and champions bis alternative because "on the tenseless view, there are no such changing facts: God can be in time without His knowledge ever needing to change.,,4 Mellor's view is that God knows only the tenseless facts which serve to D. H. Mellor, "History without the Flow oftime," Neue Zeitschriftfür systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 28 (1986): 75. J Ibid., p. 73. Ibid., p. 74.
4 PART I: CONCLUSION 137 make our tensed beliefs true, so that there is no change in God's knowledge, although He is temporal. Thus, Mellor denies to God those very tensed beliefs which MacBeath, the only other theorist of tenseless time I know of who inclines toward divine temporality, found so important to God's experience of our world that he for that very reason seemed disposed to place God in time.s Mellor's view faces the severe difficulty of explaining how God, lacking tensed beliefs, can act in a timely fashion, since He never knows at what moment He exists: He lacks all beliefs de praesenti. Since He is not timeless, but exists moment by moment successively, He must act at each moment to bring about the effects at that moment. But MeHor's God never knows at what moment He is located. If Mellor holds that by a single, continuing action at every time God brings about at each time all the effects in the entire B-series (which also seems necessary to preserve God's immutability), then he must posit action at a distance on God's part, which Mellor specifically rejects in arguing that God creates successively, moment by moment. It seems to me, therefore, that if God is temporal on a tenseless theory of time, we have to adopt MacBeath's, rather than Mellor's, viewpoint and accede to God tensed beliefs as weh as a succession of actions. But then God's possessing such a non-veridical experience of the way the world really is becomes difficult to reconcile with His cognitive perfection. Moreover, if God exists in time on a tenseless theory of time, the question of whether He is composed of temporal parts or stages cannot be avoided. If the tenseless theory implies that entities are temporally extended objects and the doctrine of temporal parts proves to be unacceptable, then God cannot be rightly conceived to exist in tenseless time. 6 In any case, what is clear is that the doctrine of divine timelessness stands or falls with the tenseless theory of time. The tenseless theory of time is the metaphysical presupposition of divine timelessness. Not that the defender of divine atemporality must prove this theory to be correct; he may simply presuppose it in the absence of good reasons to prefer the tensed theory of time. Thus, the doctrine of divine timelessness is tenable so long as the tensed theory has not been shown to be a superior account of temporal reality. As the tenseless theory of time fares, so also fares the doctrine of divine timelessness. An adjudication of the doctrine of divine timelessness is therefore made feasible by-and probably necessitates-an adjudication of the tensed vs. tenseless theory of time. Few philosophers of religion have been wiuing to undertake seriously this task. But apart from such an assessment, as we have seen, the most importarit arguments for and against divine timelessness remain inconclusive. The adjudication of this debate within the philosophy of space and time is therefore of critical importance and cannot be avoided. See Murray MacBeath, "Omniscience and Etemity I," Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1989): See discussion in my The Tenseless Theory 0/ Time: a Critical Examination Synthese Library (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000), chap. 9.
5 138 PART I: CONCLUSION I have undertaken this task in extenso in two companion volwnes 7 and shall in the practical interests of space rest content with swnmarizing my findings there. The superiority of the tensed theory of time over the tenseless theory of time may be shown by means of the following considerations. I. Argwnents for the Tensed Theory oftime A. Tensed sentences, which can neither be translated into synonymous tenseless sentences nor be given tenseless, tokenreflexive truth conditions, correspond, if true, to tensed facts. B. The experience of temporal becoming, like our experience of the external world, is properly regarded as veridical. 11. Refutation of Argwnents against the Tensed Theory oftime A. McTaggart's celebrated paradox is based upon the misguided marriage of a tenseless ontology of events or things with objective temporal becoming, as weil as the unjustified asswnption that there should exist a unique, complete description of reality. B. The passage oftime is not a myth, but a metaphor for objective temporal becoming, a notion which can be consistently explicated on apresentist metaphysic. III. Refutation of Argwnents for the Tenseless Theory oftime A. Temporal becoming is compatible with Relativity Theory ifwe reject space-time realism in favor of a neo-lorentzian interpretation ofthe formalism ofthe theory. B. Time as it plays a role in physics is a pale abstraction of a rieher metaphysical reality, omitting indexical elements such as the "here" and the ''now'' in the interest of universalizing the formulations of naturallaws. IV. Argwnents against the Tenseless Theory of Time A. In the absence of objective distinctions between past, present, and future, the relations ordering events on the tenseless theory are only gratuitously regarded as genuinely temporal relations of earlierllater than. B. The claim that temporal becoming is mind-dependent is selfdefeating, since the subjective illusion of becoming involves itself an objective becoming in the contents of consciousness. See my Tensed Theory oftime and Tenseless Theory oftime.
6 PART I: CONCLUSION 139 C. The tenseless theory entails perdurantism, the doctrine that objects have spatio-temporal parts, a view which is metaphysically counter-intuitive, incompatible with moral accountability, and entails the bizarre counterpart doctrine of transworld identity. D. The tenseless theory is theologically objectionable, since its claim that God and the universe co-exist tenselessly is incompatible with a robust doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. For ab these reasons I am convinced that time is tensed and that therefore God exists in time. What remains, then, is to explicate a coherent doctrine of divine eternity in light ofwhat contemporary philosophy and physics tell us about the nature oftime.
Craig on the Experience of Tense
Craig on the Experience of Tense In his recent book, The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, 1 William Lane Craig offers several criticisms of my views on our experience of time. The purpose
More informationDivine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise
Religious Studies 42, 123 139 f 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/s0034412506008250 Printed in the United Kingdom Divine omniscience, timelessness, and the power to do otherwise HUGH RICE Christ
More informationTense and Reality. There is a common form of problem, to be found in many areas of philosophy,
1 Tense and Reality There is a common form of problem, to be found in many areas of philosophy, concerning the relationship between our perspective on reality and reality itself. We make statements (or
More informationMcTAGGART'S PARADOX AND SMITH'S TENSED THEORY OF TIME
L. NATHAN OAKLANDER McTAGGART'S PARADOX AND SMITH'S TENSED THEORY OF TIME ABSTRACT. Since McTaggart first proposed his paradox asserting the unreality of time, numerous philosophers have attempted to defend
More informationThe Reality of Tense. that I am sitting right now, for example, or that Queen Ann is dead. So in a clear and obvious
1 The Reality of Tense Is reality somehow tensed? Or is tense a feature of how we represent reality and not properly a feature of reality itself? Although this question is often raised, it is very hard
More informationUNCORRECTED PROOF GOD AND TIME. The University of Mississippi
phib_352.fm Page 66 Friday, November 5, 2004 7:54 PM GOD AND TIME NEIL A. MANSON The University of Mississippi This book contains a dozen new essays on old theological problems. 1 The editors have sorted
More informationIs Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God?
Is Innate Foreknowledge Possible to a Temporal God? by Kel Good A very interesting attempt to avoid the conclusion that God's foreknowledge is inconsistent with creaturely freedom is an essay entitled
More informationCHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS /PHILOSOPHERS VIEW OF OMNISCIENCE AND HUMAN FREEDOM
Christian Theologians /Philosophers view of Omniscience and human freedom 1 Dr. Abdul Hafeez Fāzli Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54590 PAKISTAN Word count:
More information12. A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity)
Dean W. Zimmerman / Oxford Studies in Metaphysics - Volume 2 12-Zimmerman-chap12 Page Proof page 357 19.10.2005 2:50pm 12. A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine
More informationA problem for the eternity solution*
Philosophy of Religion 29: 87-95, 1991. 9 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. A problem for the eternity solution* DAVID WIDERKER Department of Philosophy, Bar-Ilan University,
More informationPhil 420: Metaphysics Spring [Handout 21] J. J. C. Smart: The Tenseless Theory of Time
Phil 420: Metaphysics Spring 2008 [Handout 21] J. J. C. Smart: The Tenseless Theory of Time The Tenseless Theory of Time = The B-theory Professor JeeLoo Liu 1. The ontology of words such as past, present,
More informationTime travel and the open future
Time travel and the open future University of Queensland Abstract I argue that the thesis that time travel is logically possible, is inconsistent with the necessary truth of any of the usual open future-objective
More informationTime and Existence: A Critique of "Degree Presentism"
From, Maria Elisabeth Reicher (ed.) States of Affairs (New Brunswick, Frankfurt, Lancaster, Paris: Ontos verlag 2009). Time and Existence: A Critique of "Degree Presentism" L. Nathan Oaklander One of the
More informationPHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY
PHILOSOPHY 5340 EPISTEMOLOGY Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception Chapter V. A Version of Foundationalism 1. A Principle of Foundational Justification 1. Mike's view is that there is a
More informationYuval Dolev, Time and Realism, MIT Press, 2007
[In Humana.Mente, 8 (2009)] Yuval Dolev, Time and Realism, MIT Press, 2007 Andrea Borghini College of the Holy Cross (Mass., U.S.A.) Time and Realism is a courageous book. With a clear prose and neatly
More informationFatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen
Stance Volume 6 2013 29 Fatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen Abstract: In this paper, I will examine an argument for fatalism. I will offer a formalized version of the argument and analyze one of the
More informationDolev s Anti-Metaphysical Realism: A Critique. L. Nathan Oaklander
Dolev s Anti-Metaphysical Realism: A Critique L. Nathan Oaklander In Time and Realism: Metaphysical and Antimetaphysical Perspectives, Yuval Dolev (2007) argues that the metaphysical debate between tensed
More informationTo appear in The Journal of Philosophy.
To appear in The Journal of Philosophy. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality: Kant s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. xi + 329. 40.00 (hb). ISBN: 9780198747130. Kant s doctrine
More informationDebunking The Hellenistic Myth: Why Christians Should Believe That God Is In Time
Piąte Piętro Bydgoskie Czasopismo Filozoficzne ISSN Online: 2544-4131 nr 2/2017 Debunking The Hellenistic Myth: Why Christians Should Believe That God Is In Time Alin Cucu Internationale Akademie für Philosophie
More informationALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI
ALTERNATIVE SELF-DEFEAT ARGUMENTS: A REPLY TO MIZRAHI Michael HUEMER ABSTRACT: I address Moti Mizrahi s objections to my use of the Self-Defeat Argument for Phenomenal Conservatism (PC). Mizrahi contends
More informationSIMPLICITY AND ASEITY. Jeffrey E. Brower. There is a traditional theistic doctrine, known as the doctrine of divine simplicity,
SIMPLICITY AND ASEITY Jeffrey E. Brower There is a traditional theistic doctrine, known as the doctrine of divine simplicity, according to which God is an absolutely simple being, completely devoid of
More informationTruth At a World for Modal Propositions
Truth At a World for Modal Propositions 1 Introduction Existentialism is a thesis that concerns the ontological status of individual essences and singular propositions. Let us define an individual essence
More informationA Complex Eternity. One of the central issues in the philosophy of religion is the relationship between
Dan Sheffler A Complex Eternity One of the central issues in the philosophy of religion is the relationship between God and time. In the contemporary discussion, the issue is framed between the two opposing
More informationACTUALISM AND THISNESS*
ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS ACTUALISM AND THISNESS* I. THE THESIS My thesis is that all possibilities are purely qualitative except insofar as they involve individuals that actually exist. I have argued elsewhere
More informationCOULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon Prosser
Ratio, 20.1 (2007), 75-90. Reprinted in L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Philosophy of Time: Critical Concepts in Philosophy. New York/London: Routledge, 2008. COULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon
More informationTEMPORAL NECESSITY AND LOGICAL FATALISM. by Joseph Diekemper
TEMPORAL NECESSITY AND LOGICAL FATALISM by Joseph Diekemper ABSTRACT I begin by briefly mentioning two different logical fatalistic argument types: one from temporal necessity, and one from antecedent
More informationPresentism and Physicalism 1!
Presentism and Physicalism 1 Presentism is the view that only the present exists, which mates with the A-theory s temporal motion and non-relational tense. After examining the compatibility of a presentist
More informationTemporary Intrinsics and the Problem of Alienation
Temporary Intrinsics and the Problem of Alienation Sungil Han (10/19/2012) Persisting objects change their intrinsic properties. When you sit, you have a bent shape. When you stand, you have a straightened
More informationPHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS. Methods that Metaphysicians Use
PHILOSOPHY 4360/5360 METAPHYSICS Methods that Metaphysicians Use Method 1: The appeal to what one can imagine where imagining some state of affairs involves forming a vivid image of that state of affairs.
More informationGod s Personal Freedom: A Response to Katherin Rogers
God s Personal Freedom: A Response to Katherin Rogers Kevin M. Staley Saint Anselm College This paper defends the thesis that God need not have created this world and could have created some other world.
More informationBEGINNINGLESS PAST AND ENDLESS FUTURE: REPLY TO CRAIG. Wes Morriston. In a recent paper, I claimed that if a familiar line of argument against
Forthcoming in Faith and Philosophy BEGINNINGLESS PAST AND ENDLESS FUTURE: REPLY TO CRAIG Wes Morriston In a recent paper, I claimed that if a familiar line of argument against the possibility of a beginningless
More informationWho or what is God?, asks John Hick (Hick 2009). A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an
John Hick on whether God could be an infinite person Daniel Howard-Snyder Western Washington University Abstract: "Who or what is God?," asks John Hick. A theist might answer: God is an infinite person,
More informationOPEN THEISM, OMNISCIENCE, AND THE NATURE OF THE FUTURE. Alan R. Rhoda, Gregory A. Boyd, Thomas G. Belt
Forthcoming in Faith and Philosophy OPEN THEISM, OMNISCIENCE, AND THE NATURE OF THE FUTURE Alan R. Rhoda, Gregory A. Boyd, Thomas G. Belt ABSTRACT: If the future is settled in the sense that it is exhaustively
More informationxiv Truth Without Objectivity
Introduction There is a certain approach to theorizing about language that is called truthconditional semantics. The underlying idea of truth-conditional semantics is often summarized as the idea that
More informationScope Fallacies and the "Decisive Objection" Against Endurance
Philosophia (2006) 34:441-452 DOI 10.1007/s 11406-007-9046-z Scope Fallacies and the "Decisive Objection" Against Endurance Lawrence B. Lombard Received: 15 September 2006 /Accepted: 12 February 2007 /
More informationBigelow, Possible Worlds and The Passage of Time
Bigelow, Possible Worlds and The Passage of Time L. NATHAN OAKLANDER In his celebrated argument, McTaggart claimed that time is unreal because it involves temporal passage - the movement of the Now along
More informationPhilosophy of time: Combining the A-series and the B-series
Philosophy of time: Combining the A-series and the B-series MSc Thesis (Afstudeerscriptie) written by Hanne Kristin Berg (born February 3, 1987 in Tiller, Norway) under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Frank
More informationIN his paper, 'Does Tense Logic Rest Upon a Mistake?' (to appear
128 ANALYSIS context-dependence that if things had been different, 'the actual world' would have picked out some world other than the actual one. Tulane University, GRAEME FORBES 1983 New Orleans, Louisiana
More informationThe Character of Space in Kant s First Critique By Justin Murphy October 16, 2006
The Character of Space in Kant s First Critique By Justin Murphy October 16, 2006 The familiar problems of skepticism necessarily entangled in empiricist epistemology can only be avoided with recourse
More informationPHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVES Philosophical Perspectives, 25, Metaphysics, 2011 EXPERIENCE AND THE PASSAGE OF TIME Bradford Skow 1. Introduction Some philosophers believe that the passage of time is a real
More informationWhy Four-Dimensionalism Explains Coincidence
M. Eddon Why Four-Dimensionalism Explains Coincidence Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2010) 88: 721-729 Abstract: In Does Four-Dimensionalism Explain Coincidence? Mark Moyer argues that there is no
More informationRUSSELL, NEGATIVE FACTS, AND ONTOLOGY* L. NATHAN OAKLANDERt SILVANO MIRACCHI
RUSSELL, NEGATIVE FACTS, AND ONTOLOGY* L. NATHAN OAKLANDERt University of Michigan-Flint SILVANO MIRACCHI Beverly Hills, California Russell's introduction of negative facts to account for the truth of
More informationNathan Oaklander IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE SPACE?
Nathan Oaklander IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE SPACE? Abstract. One issue that Bergmann discusses in his article "Synthetic A Priori" is the ontology of space. He presents his answer
More informationWorld without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.
Book reviews World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Naturalism, by Michael C. Rea. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004, viii + 245 pp., $24.95. This is a splendid book. Its ideas are bold and
More informationINVESTIGATING THE PRESUPPOSITIONAL REALM OF BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, PART II: CANALE ON REASON
Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2, 217-240. Copyright 2009 Andrews University Press. INVESTIGATING THE PRESUPPOSITIONAL REALM OF BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, PART II: CANALE ON REASON
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationLogical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant's Pure General Logic Chicago February 21 st 2018 Tyke Nunez
Logical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant's Pure General Logic Chicago February 21 st 2018 Tyke Nunez 1 Introduction (1) Normativists: logic's laws are unconditional norms for how we ought
More informationPresentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism
Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism Kristie Miller 1 and Jane Weiling Loo 1 1University of Sydney Department of Philosophy Sydney, New South Wales Australia donald.baxter@uconn.edu Article
More informationIn Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Book Reviews 1 In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xiv + 232. H/b 37.50, $54.95, P/b 13.95,
More informationKant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
More informationBOOK REVIEWS. The arguments of the Parmenides, though they do not refute the Theory of Forms, do expose certain problems, ambiguities and
BOOK REVIEWS Unity and Development in Plato's Metaphysics. By William J. Prior. London & Sydney, Croom Helm, 1986. pp201. Reviewed by J. Angelo Corlett, University of California Santa Barbara. Prior argues
More informationpart one MACROSTRUCTURE Cambridge University Press X - A Theory of Argument Mark Vorobej Excerpt More information
part one MACROSTRUCTURE 1 Arguments 1.1 Authors and Audiences An argument is a social activity, the goal of which is interpersonal rational persuasion. More precisely, we ll say that an argument occurs
More informationPostscript to Plenitude of Possible Structures (2016)
Postscript to Plenitude of Possible Structures (2016) The principle of plenitude for possible structures (PPS) that I endorsed tells us what structures are instantiated at possible worlds, but not what
More informationIssue 4, Special Conference Proceedings Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society
Issue 4, Special Conference Proceedings 2017 Published by the Durham University Undergraduate Philosophy Society An Alternative Approach to Mathematical Ontology Amber Donovan (Durham University) Introduction
More informationMistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May
Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle Evan E. May Part 1: The Issue A significant question arising from the discipline of philosophy concerns the nature of the mind. What constitutes
More informationIntroduction. In: God, Eternity, and Time. Hg. v. Christian Tapp und Edmund Runggaldier, Farnham: Ashgate 2011, 1-8.
In: God, Eternity, and Time. Hg. v. Christian Tapp und Edmund Runggaldier, Farnham: Ashgate 2011, 1-8. 1 Introduction Is God in time? If he is, how can he be a perfect being that has created time? If he
More informationGod, Time, and Eternity
God, Time, and Eternity Oxbridge Conference, July 23, 2002 William Lane Craig It's a delight to be here, and I'm particularly gratified that Walter mentioned the Evangelical Philosophical Society. God
More informationDoes the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:
Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore I argue that Moore s famous response to the skeptic should be accepted even by the skeptic. My paper has three main stages. First, I will briefly outline G. E.
More informationMcTaggart s Paradox Defended
L. NATHAN OAKLANDER McTaggart s Paradox Defended No argument has done as much to stimulate debate in the philosophy of time as McTaggart s argument for the unreality of time. 1 On the one side are A-theorists
More informationLecture 3. I argued in the previous lecture for a relationist solution to Frege's puzzle, one which
1 Lecture 3 I argued in the previous lecture for a relationist solution to Frege's puzzle, one which posits a semantic difference between the pairs of names 'Cicero', 'Cicero' and 'Cicero', 'Tully' even
More informationNew Aristotelianism, Routledge, 2012), in which he expanded upon
Powers, Essentialism and Agency: A Reply to Alexander Bird Ruth Porter Groff, Saint Louis University AUB Conference, April 28-29, 2016 1. Here s the backstory. A couple of years ago my friend Alexander
More informationReply to Kit Fine. Theodore Sider July 19, 2013
Reply to Kit Fine Theodore Sider July 19, 2013 Kit Fine s paper raises important and difficult issues about my approach to the metaphysics of fundamentality. In chapters 7 and 8 I examined certain subtle
More informationSummary of Sensorama: A Phenomenalist Analysis of Spacetime and Its Contents
Forthcoming in Analysis Reviews Summary of Sensorama: A Phenomenalist Analysis of Spacetime and Its Contents Michael Pelczar National University of Singapore What is time? Time is the measure of motion.
More informationThe Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will
Stance Volume 3 April 2010 The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will ABSTRACT: I examine Leibniz s version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason with respect to free will, paying particular attention
More informationPeter L.P. Simpson January, 2015
1 This translation of the Prologue of the Ordinatio of the Venerable Inceptor, William of Ockham, is partial and in progress. The prologue and the first distinction of book one of the Ordinatio fill volume
More informationTHE PROBLEMS OF DIVINE LOCATION AND AGE
European Journal of Science and Theology, April 2017, Vol.13, No.2, 161-170 THE PROBLEMS OF DIVINE LOCATION AND AGE Seungbae Park * Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 689-798,
More information2 Why Truthmakers GONZALO RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA 1. INTRODUCTION
2 Why Truthmakers GONZALO RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA 1. INTRODUCTION Consider a certain red rose. The proposition that the rose is red is true because the rose is red. One might say as well that the proposition
More informationPhilosophy 125 Day 13: Overview
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Philosophy 125 Day 13: Overview Reminder: Due Date for 1st Papers and SQ s, October 16 (next Th!) Zimmerman & Hacking papers on Identity of Indiscernibles online
More informationReimagining God and Time. Erika Brown. The Christian God is thought of as all-powerful. Yet He is not the only concept that
Reimagining God and Time Erika Brown The Christian God is thought of as all-powerful. Yet He is not the only concept that we attribute omnipotence to. Another is time. Time heals all wounds. Time kills
More informationThe Scientific and Theological Superiority of Divine Timelessness
University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 4-23-2015 The Scientific and Theological Superiority of Divine Timelessness David Christian Justice University of Missouri-St. Louis Follow
More informationTranscendence J. J. Valberg *
Journal of Philosophy of Life Vol.7, No.1 (July 2017):187-194 Transcendence J. J. Valberg * Abstract James Tartaglia in his book Philosophy in a Meaningless Life advances what he calls The Transcendent
More informationPhilosophy 125 Day 21: Overview
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Philosophy 125 Day 21: Overview 1st Papers/SQ s to be returned this week (stay tuned... ) Vanessa s handout on Realism about propositions to be posted Second papers/s.q.
More informationEach copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
The Physical World Author(s): Barry Stroud Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 87 (1986-1987), pp. 263-277 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian
More informationRogers Little Swerve: The Confessions of a Not-So-Open-Theist
Rogers Little Swerve: The Confessions of a Not-So-Open-Theist Kevin M. Staley Saint Anselm College Rogers is an eloquent defender of perfect being theology, a version of classical theism. She is an opponent
More informationNo Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter
Forthcoming in Philosophia Christi 13:1 (2011) http://www.epsociety.org/philchristi/ No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter James N. Anderson David Reiter
More informationRententionalism vs Extensionalism about Time Consciousness:
Rententionalism vs Extensionalism about Time Consciousness: Comments on Barry Dainton Harvard Time Conference Adam Pautz 1. The Plan In his interesting paper, Barry defends Extentionalism about time consciousness
More informationBOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid s Theory of Action
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 2005 BOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity:
More informationSIMON BOSTOCK Internal Properties and Property Realism
SIMON BOSTOCK Internal Properties and Property Realism R ealism about properties, standardly, is contrasted with nominalism. According to nominalism, only particulars exist. According to realism, both
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY
Science and the Future of Mankind Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 99, Vatican City 2001 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv99/sv99-berti.pdf THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION
More informationTHE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE
Diametros nr 29 (wrzesień 2011): 80-92 THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE Karol Polcyn 1. PRELIMINARIES Chalmers articulates his argument in terms of two-dimensional
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction
Philosophy 5340 - Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction In the section entitled Sceptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding
More informationDESCARTES ONTOLOGICAL PROOF: AN INTERPRETATION AND DEFENSE
DESCARTES ONTOLOGICAL PROOF: AN INTERPRETATION AND DEFENSE STANISŁAW JUDYCKI University of Gdańsk Abstract. It is widely assumed among contemporary philosophers that Descartes version of ontological proof,
More informationOn Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Stephen Puryear. Citation Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2016, v. 94 n. 3, p.
Title On Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Stephen Puryear Author(s) Loke, TEA Citation Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2016, v. 94 n. 3, p. 591-595 Issued Date 2016 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/220687
More informationCaspar Hare March 2010 Forthcoming in Philosophy Compass. Realism About Tense and Perspective
1 Caspar Hare March 2010 Forthcoming in Philosophy Compass Realism About Tense and Perspective What things are there? Well, there are some things of which I am perceptually aware a chewed up pencil, a
More informationKant s Transcendental Exposition of Space and Time in the Transcendental Aesthetic : A Critique
34 An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia Vol. 10(1), Serial No.40, January, 2016: 34-45 ISSN 1994-9057 (Print) ISSN 2070--0083 (Online) Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v10i1.4 Kant
More informationIn Epistemic Relativism, Mark Kalderon defends a view that has become
Aporia vol. 24 no. 1 2014 Incoherence in Epistemic Relativism I. Introduction In Epistemic Relativism, Mark Kalderon defends a view that has become increasingly popular across various academic disciplines.
More informationBroad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument
Broad on God Broad on Theological Arguments I. The Ontological Argument Sample Ontological Argument: Suppose that God is the most perfect or most excellent being. Consider two things: (1)An entity that
More informationTHE POSSIBILITY OF AN ALL-KNOWING GOD
THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ALL-KNOWING GOD The Possibility of an All-Knowing God Jonathan L. Kvanvig Assistant Professor of Philosophy Texas A & M University Palgrave Macmillan Jonathan L. Kvanvig, 1986 Softcover
More informationSAVING RELATIVISM FROM ITS SAVIOUR
CRÍTICA, Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía Vol. XXXI, No. 91 (abril 1999): 91 103 SAVING RELATIVISM FROM ITS SAVIOUR MAX KÖLBEL Doctoral Programme in Cognitive Science Universität Hamburg In his paper
More informationDivine Eternity and the Reduplicative Qua. are present to God or does God experience a succession of moments? Most philosophers agree
Divine Eternity and the Reduplicative Qua Introduction One of the great polemics of Christian theism is how we ought to understand God s relationship to time. Is God timeless or temporal? Does God transcend
More informationRight-Making, Reference, and Reduction
Right-Making, Reference, and Reduction Kent State University BIBLID [0873-626X (2014) 39; pp. 139-145] Abstract The causal theory of reference (CTR) provides a well-articulated and widely-accepted account
More informationThe Devilish Complexities of Divine Simplicity
The Devilish Complexities of Divine Simplicity Of all the core doctrines of traditional Western theology, perhaps none has received more summary dismissals than the doctrine of divine simplicity. Consider,
More informationQUESTION 3. God s Simplicity
QUESTION 3 God s Simplicity Once we have ascertained that a given thing exists, we then have to inquire into its mode of being in order to come to know its real definition (quid est). However, in the case
More informationCoordination Problems
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXXI No. 2, September 2010 Ó 2010 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC Coordination Problems scott soames
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationHow to Predict Future Contingencies İlhan İnan
Abstract How to Predict Future Contingencies İlhan İnan Is it possible to make true predictions about future contingencies in an indeterministic world? This time-honored metaphysical question that goes
More informationThe Kalam Cosmological Argument provides no support for theism
The Kalam Cosmological Argument provides no support for theism 0) Introduction 1) A contradiction follows from William Lane Craig's position 2) A tensed theory of time entails that it's not the case that
More informationPublished in Mind, 2000, 109 (434), pp
Published in Mind, 2000, 109 (434), pp. 255-273. What is the Problem of Universals? GONZALO RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA 1. Introduction Although the Problem of Universals is one of the oldest philosophical problems,
More informationTHE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM: A REPLY TO WIERENGA
THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL TRINITARIANISM: A REPLY TO WIERENGA Jeffrey E. Brower In a recent article, Edward Wierenga defends a version of Social Trinitarianism according to which the Persons of the Trinity
More informationAnselmian Theism and Created Freedom: Response to Grant and Staley
Anselmian Theism and Created Freedom: Response to Grant and Staley Katherin A. Rogers University of Delaware I thank Grant and Staley for their comments, both kind and critical, on my book Anselm on Freedom.
More information