1 Russell s Problems of Philosophy UNIVERSALS & OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THEM F e b r u a r y 2 Today : 1. Review A Priori Knowledge 2. The Case for Universals 3. Universals to the Rescue! 4. On Philosophy Essays 5. Next Lecture
2 1.0 Review A Priori Knowledge The Question How is a priori knowledge possible? 2 Analytic/Synthetic Distinction A vixen is a fox true by definition Predicate obtained by analysing subject Maid Marion is a vixen not true by definition No analysis of subject reveals the predicate Analytic truths are a priori because they re trivial; synthetic truths are not trivial they invoke a substantial connection between their constituents This means they allow us to extend our knowledge in non-trivial ways!
3 1.0 Review A Priori Knowledge The general principles upon which we rely to reach beyond the things with which we re acquainted needed to be a priori because otherwise we could have no grounds for affirming them 3 In order to deliver genuinely novel, non-trivial information, these principles need to be synthetic too But then it appears mysterious that the synthetic principles upon which we rely to escape from our immediate environs should be a priori at all
4 1.0 Review A Priori Knowledge The Synthetic A Priori Problem 4 The general principles upon which we rely to reach beyond our acquaintances need to be a priori, otherwise we could have no grounds for affirming them We lack acquaintance with things that aren t immediately given to us & such principles aren t immediately given to us In order to deliver genuine, non-trivial information, these principles need to be synthetic too So why think the synthetic principles we rely on are a priori?!?!?
5 1.0 Review A Priori Knowledge Russell thinks Kant gives a bad solution to this problem 5 Kant s Subjective Solution synthetic truths are only ever a priori because the objects they are about don t exist independently of us, but are constituted by our appreciation of them Russell s Objection Kant s account of synthetic a priori truths doesn t explain their universal & necessary character Our nature is as much a fact of the existing world as anything, and there can be no certainty that it will remain constant. It might happen, if Kant is right, that tomorrow our nature would so change as to make two and two become five. (PoP) The Upshot our a priori knowledge is not merely knowledge about the constitution of our minds, but is applicable to whatever the world may contain, both what is mental and what is no-mental. (PoP)
6 2.0 The Case for Universals 6 Russell s Solution A priori knowledge concerns universals The fact seems to be that all our a priori knowledge is concerned with entities which do not, properly speaking, exist, either in the mental or the physical world. These entities are such as can be named by parts of speech which are not substantives; they are such entities as qualities or relations. (PoP) Chapter 9 tells us about the nature of universals; Chapter 10 argues that, because our minds have the capacity to grasp universals (and the immutable interconnections between them), a priori knowledge is possible Russell s theory of universals is an elaboration of Plato s
7 2.0 The Case for Universals What do these have in common? 7 They re all tables! But what is this tableness they all have? They must all, in some sense, partake of a common nature, which will be found in whatever is [a table] and in nothing else. This common nature, in virtue of which they are all [a table], will be [tableness] itself, the pure essence the admixture of which with facts of ordinary life produces the multiplicity of [tables]. (PoP)
8 2.0 The Case for Universals Consider every square thing what is the squareness they have in common, marking them out from the non-squares? Can t just be the fact that (in English) we call them square, because it s arbitrary what term we use could have called them round, snarfblat Nor can it be just that we happen to think of them as square, since square things are square even if we never think of them Nor that it is something mental, because then squareness would lose the universal character it requires to bestow a common nature upon the things that participate it in Instead, it must be something else something independent, nonmental, but which is shared by all the square things This entity is the universal squareness Particular thing with same kind of nature as what is given in sensation Universal shared by particulars, grounds groupings 8
9 2.0 The Case for Universals According to Russell, the logical/grammatical category of the expression used to pick something out tells us whether it is a particular or a universal Proper names stand for particulars, other substantives, adjectives, prepositions and verbs stand for universals Adjectives and common nouns express properties of single things Prepositions and verbs express relations between two or more things red & table (properties) vs. in & places (relations) 9 A Linguistic argument for Universals Every sentence include at least one word adjective, common name, preposition, or verb that denotes a universal Thus all truths involve universals, and all knowledge of truths involve acquaintance with universals. (PoP)
10 2.0 The Case for Universals A Linguistic Argument for Universals 1. Universals are denoted by adjectives, prepositions, and verbs 2. Sentences require adjectives, prepositions, verbs, etc. Otherwise, they d merely be a list of names! John George Paul Ringo??? 3. True propositions are expressed by sentences 4. So all true propositions must involve universals BGI1 Propositions are composed of parts; these parts correspond to the things denoted by the words that make up the sentence that expresses them BGI2 Principle of Acquaintance Every proposition which we can understand must be composed wholly of constituents with which we are acquainted 5. Therefore, whenever we grasp a true proposition, we must have acquaintance with universals 6. Since we grasp propositions, universals must exist! 10
11 2.0 The Case for Universals Not everyone buys into all (or even any!) universals Monism (Bradley, Horgan) there is only one thing, so there are no relations Monadism (Leibnitz) there are many things, but no relations Nominalism (Berkeley, Hume, Quine) there are no universals 11 Russell aims to undermine this trio by establishing the existence of at least one relation resemblance Russell s argument can be broken down into three stages Stage 1 establish the prima facie case that the nominalist is committed to a universal of resemblance
12 2.0 The Case for Universals Stage 1 Nominalist commitment to resemblance 1. According to nominalism, x is red just in case it resembles other red things 2. Since there are many red things, this resemblance must hold between many pairs of red things This means resemblance is a one-overmany across these pairs 4. So, instead of avoiding universals, the nominalist presupposes at least one namely, the universal of resemblance!
13 2.0 The Case for Universals Stage 2 Russell considers & rejects a nominalist reply Nominalist: Resemblance is not a one-over many because there is a different resemblance for each pair of resembling things Russell: These different resemblances need to resemble each other, otherwise they re not resemblance which means we need to take resemblance as a one-over-many once more 13 Stage 3 Russell generalises his conclusion If one universal is admitted, there s no reason to deny the existence of the others! Russell s fallacy just because there is no reason to admit one universal, it does not follow that there is reason to admit many (one alone might do!) Even so, if the nominalist requires at least one universal, they aren t really in a position to deny that it is never necessary to deny universals
14 2.0 The Case for Universals Having shown there are universals, Russell goes on to show that they are not mental they are mind independent Russell gives another version of the earwig argument at the end of Chapter 8 Edinburgh is north of London states a relation between two places Edinburgh and London 14 This relation holds even if there were no human beings around to know about North and South, or even if no minds existed anywhere in the universe But this relation cannot be a particular a concrete thing with a distinctive embodiment at a place and time Relation isn t in Edinburgh or London is neutral between them Relation isn t at a particular time for the same reason So the relation radically different than Edinburg, London, etc.
15 3.0 Solving SAP Universals to the Rescue! 15 In Chapter 10, Russell maintains that we have acquaintance with some universals those had by sense-data but adds that abstraction plays a role in becoming so acquainted When we see a white patch we are acquainted in the first instance with the particular patch; but by seeing many white patches, we easily learn to abstract the whiteness which they all have in common, and in learning to do this we are learning to be acquainted with whiteness.universals of this sort many be called sensible qualities. They could be apprehended with less effort of abstraction than any others, and they seem less removed from particulars than other universals are. (PoP) An example might help to characterize abstraction
17 3.0 Solving SAP Universals to the Rescue! 17 A more complicated form of abstraction enables us to learn about relations by comparing pairs (or triplets, or ) Our knowledge of such relations, though it requires more power of abstraction than is required for perceiving the qualities of sense-data, appears to be equally immediate, and (at least in some cases) equally indubitable. Thus there is immediate knowledge concerning universals as well as concerning sense-data. (PoP) Problem does the need for abstraction compromise the immediacy of our knowledge of sensible qualities? Regardless, our acquaintance with these universals provides a foundation for our a priori knowledge
18 3.0 Solving SAP Universals to the Rescue! Russell focuses on statements of pure arithmetic 18 We needn t (and couldn t!) have knowledge of all the couples in the universe in order to know that the general proposition 2+2=4 is true Since the proposition isn t about particulars, it must be about universals! It expresses a relation between the universal 2 and the universal 4 Since we know that 2+2= 4 is true, it follows that we have the power of sometimes perceiving such relations between universals, and therefore of sometimes knowing general a priori propositions such as those of arithmetic and logic. (PoP) As arithmetical and logical truths are synthetic, this power allows us to have synthetic a priori knowledge!
19 3.0 Solving SAP Universals to the Rescue! A priori knowledge looked problematic, because it seemed to presupposed acquaintance with particulars beyond our epistemic ken 19 If synthetic truths are a priori, then we had to explain how we could get such information through reason which looks hard if such truths pertained to particulars (knowledge of which we get via experience) But when we realize that such claims concern universals, it becomes intelligible how a priori knowledge is attainable We do so via grasping the relations between universals So we solve the SAP Problem via our knowledge of universals and the relations that hold between them!
20 4.0 On Philosophy Essays 20 A philosophy essay is a reasoned defence of a clearly stated thesis, using compelling arguments, explicated in detail Thesis the point the essay is arguing for For the essays, this will be your answer to the set question Russell s solution to the problem of induction is unsuccessful, in that it does not in fact resolve the problem. Argument the case made in support of the thesis Philosophers are argument-machines feed in coffee, cigarettes, ideas, etc., and they out-put arguments! This is because Russell s so-called solution begs the question by assuming the Uniformity of Nature Principle the very principle the problem of induction targets.
21 4.0 On Philosophy Essays 21 Introduction & Thesis Exposition & Set-up Main Argument Objections Responses to Objections Conclusions Bibliography
22 The Intro 4.0 On Philosophy Essays Do! Jump straight into the claim that you are defending Do! State the thesis clearly, concisely, and succinctly Do! Provide a structure or roadmap DO NOT! Start with Since the dawn of time, Russell was born Thesis Do! Tell your reader what your thesis/conclusion is early and often DO NOT! Leave your thesis as a surprise to the end Exposition Expound on the relevant issues, explain & define key points in own words, employ judicious use of quotation for support 22 Signpost add a sentence or two to remind your reader where you are & where you are going next
23 4.0 On Philosophy Essays Evaluate the arguments Challenge their validity, truth of the premises, motivation for premises Remember to offer reasons for whatever you argue! Consider possible objections to your claims/arguments And respond to them! Conclusion Summarize what you have defended and how you ve done so 23 Assume your audience is lazy, stupid, and mean Lazy won t work to figure out convoluted metaphors/sentences Stupid can only understand simple, direct language Mean offers no charity, so be as clear and explicit as possible Not Uninformed! if you can assume some things as background, do so
24 Originality 4.0 On Philosophy Essays You do not have to be ground-breaking or make a completely original contribution to human thought Your originality can manifest itself through Thoughtfulness of discussion and responses Presentation of argument/criticisms How you structure the debate 24 How you develop existing ideas and arguments Bottom line you need to come up with your own arguments; merely summarizing/repeating what others have said is not enough Answer the Question Answer the whole question! Answer the set question!
25 4.0 On Philosophy Essays 25 Question 1 In The Problems of Philosophy, Russell argues that our sense perceptions provide good grounds for our belief in the existence of a world of matter. Is this argument effective? Why or why not? Thesis should say (a) whether R s argument is effective, and (b) why/not! This essay will argue that Russell s abductive argument for the existence of physical objects is ineffective, because it turns on a notion of best explanation that is not clear enough to support Russell s conclusion Argument should provide support for Thesis! Should provide some definitions e.g. matter, abductive argument Should explicate Russell s argument (otherwise, how can you evaluate?) Should evaluate otherwise, not answered the whole question!
26 4.0 On Philosophy Essays Question 2 Russell distinguishes between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. What is the difference between these two types of knowledge? What, according to Russell, can be known by acquaintance? What can only be known by description? Is Russell correct in these claims? Thesis can focus on last part of question does the distinction work like Russell thinks it does? If so, why? If not, why not? Russell s distinction does not apply as he thinks it does, because he is wrong concerning what we are acquainted with. This will be shown by Argument should provide support for thesis Requires some definitions know. by acquaintance, know. by description, acquaintance Requires detailing distinction & how Russell thinks they apply 26
27 5.0 Next Lecture 27 Tuesday 7 February 12:00 13:00 Joseph Black 419 Truth Read Problems of Philosophy, Chpts. 11 & 12 Take care and see you on Tuesday!
Russell s Problems of Philosophy KNOWLEDGE: A CQUAINTANCE & DESCRIPTION J a n u a r y 2 4 Today : 1. Review Russell s against Idealism 2. Knowledge by Acquaintance & Description 3. What are we acquianted
Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 Philosophical Grammar The study of grammar, in my opinion, is capable of throwing far more light on philosophical questions
Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1 Analysis 46 Philosophical grammar can shed light on philosophical questions. Grammatical differences can be used as a source of discovery and a guide
Russell s Problems of Philosophy IT S (NOT) ALL IN YOUR HEAD J a n u a r y 1 9 Today : 1. Review Existence & Nature of Matter 2. Russell s case against Idealism 3. Next Lecture 2.0 Review Existence & Nature
1 Plan: Kant Lecture #2: How are pure mathematics and pure natural science possible? 1. Review: Problem of Metaphysics 2. Kantian Commitments 3. Pure Mathematics 4. Transcendental Idealism 5. Pure Natural
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier In Theaetetus Plato introduced the definition of knowledge which is often translated
Theories of propositions phil 93515 Jeff Speaks January 16, 2007 1 Commitment to propositions.......................... 1 2 A Fregean theory of reference.......................... 2 3 Three theories of
+ Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble + Innate vs. a priori n Philosophers today usually distinguish psychological from epistemological questions.
What is the Frege/Russell Analysis of Quantification? Scott Soames The Frege-Russell analysis of quantification was a fundamental advance in semantics and philosophical logic. Abstracting away from details
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE Now, it is a defect of [natural] languages that expressions are possible within them, which, in their grammatical form, seemingly determined to designate
[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1 [3.1.] Biographical Background. 1872: born in the city of Trellech, in the county of Monmouthshire, now part of Wales 2 One of his grandfathers was Lord John Russell, who twice
In Defense of Radical Empiricism Joseph Benjamin Riegel A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXXXI No. 2, September 2010 Ó 2010 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC Coordination Problems scott soames
Analyticity and reference determiners Jeff Speaks November 9, 2011 1. The language myth... 1 2. The definition of analyticity... 3 3. Defining containment... 4 4. Some remaining questions... 6 4.1. Reference
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth REVIEW: THREE
From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction Let me see if I can say a few things to re-cap our first discussion of the Transcendental Logic, and help you get a foothold for what follows. Kant
24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI perception Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. 1 reminder from first lecture: course overview 1. can computers think? 2. from dualism to functionalism a survey of theories
Kant Lecture 4 Review Synthetic a priori knowledge Statements involving necessity or strict universality could never be known on the basis of sense experience, and are thus known (if known at all) a priori.
Quine on the analytic/synthetic distinction Jeff Speaks March 14, 2005 1 Analyticity and synonymy.............................. 1 2 Synonymy and definition ( 2)............................ 2 3 Synonymy
KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS John Watling Kant was an idealist. His idealism was in some ways, it is true, less extreme than that of Berkeley. He distinguished his own by calling
PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T AGENDA 1. Review of Epistemology 2. Kant Kant s Compromise Kant s Copernican Revolution 3. The Nature of Truth KNOWLEDGE:
Book Reviews 1 In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of A Priori Justification, by Laurence BonJour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. xiv + 232. H/b 37.50, $54.95, P/b 13.95,
Contents EMPIRICISM PHIL3072, ANU, 2015 Jason Grossman http://empiricism.xeny.net lecture 9: 22 September Recap Bertrand Russell: reductionism in physics Common sense is self-refuting Acquaintance versus
1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate
Immanuel Kant: The Copernican Revolution The CopernicanRevolution Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) The Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is Kant s best known work. In this monumental work, he begins a Copernican-like
Fred Wilson UNIVERSALS, PARTICULARS, TROPES AND BLOBS Abstract. This study explores how to do ontology within a positivist framework, and specifically the issue of universals and particulars. It is argued
Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori PHIL 83104 November 2, 2011 Both Boghossian and Harman address themselves to the question of whether our a priori knowledge can be explained in
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 21 Lecture - 21 Kant Forms of sensibility Categories
Cory Juhl, Eric Loomis, Analyticity (New York: Routledge, 2010). Reviewed by Viorel Ţuţui 1 Since it was introduced by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason, the analytic synthetic distinction had
GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks) Chapter 1 CONCEPT OF PHILOSOPHY (4 marks allotted) MCQ 1X2 = 2 SAQ -- 1X2 = 2 (a) Nature of Philosophy: The word Philosophy is originated from two Greek words Philos
Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords ISBN 9780198802693 Title The Value of Rationality Author(s) Ralph Wedgwood Book abstract Book keywords Rationality is a central concept for epistemology,
The Metaphysics of Logical Atomism Bernard Linsky May 12, 2000 Bertrand Russell made use of logic as an analytical tool from the start of his philosophical career and early on adopted a metaphysics that
Russell on Denoting G. J. Mattey Fall, 2005 / Philosophy 156 Denoting in The Principles of Mathematics This notion [denoting] lies at the bottom (I think) of all theories of substance, of the subject-predicate
Russell on Descriptions Bertrand Russell s analysis of descriptions is certainly one of the most famous (perhaps the most famous) theories in philosophy not just philosophy of language over the last century.
Intro to Philosophy Review for Exam 2 Epistemology Theory of Knowledge What is knowledge? What is the structure of knowledge? What particular things can I know? What particular things do I know? Do I know
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2014 Class #26 Kant s Copernican Revolution The Synthetic A Priori Forms of Intuition Marcus, Modern Philosophy,
Constructing the World Lecture 6: Whither the Aufbau? David Chalmers Plan *1. Introduction 2. Definitional, Analytic, Primitive Scrutability 3. Narrow Scrutability 4. Acquaintance Scrutability 5. Fundamental
Topics and Posterior Analytics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey Logic Aristotle is the first philosopher to study systematically what we call logic Specifically, Aristotle investigated what we now
Unit 2 WoK 1 - Perception Russell Reading - Appearance and Reality The Russell document provides a basic framework for looking at the limitations of our senses. In small groups, discuss and record what
Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses David Hume General Points about Hume's Project The rationalist method used by Descartes cannot provide justification for any substantial, interesting claims about
How Do We Know Anything about Mathematics? - A Defence of Platonism Majda Trobok University of Rijeka original scientific paper UDK: 141.131 1:51 510.21 ABSTRACT In this paper I will try to say something
1/10 The Fourth Paralogism and the Refutation of Idealism The Fourth Paralogism is quite different from the three that preceded it because, although it is treated as a part of rational psychology, it main
Philosophy 308: The Language Revolution Fall 2014 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class #3 - Meinong and Mill 1. Meinongian Subsistence The work of the Moderns on language shows us a problem arising in
Philosophy of Mathematics Kant Owen Griffiths firstname.lastname@example.org St John s College, Cambridge 20/10/15 Immanuel Kant Born in 1724 in Königsberg, Prussia. Enrolled at the University of Königsberg in 1740 and
Does the Third Man Argument refute the theory of forms? Fine  recognises four versions of the Third Man Argument (TMA). However, she argues persuasively that these are similar arguments with similar
Constructing the World Lecture 1: A Scrutable World David Chalmers Plan *1. Laplace s demon 2. Primitive concepts and the Aufbau 3. Problems for the Aufbau 4. The scrutability base 5. Applications Laplace
Comments on Ontological Anti-Realism Cian Dorr INPC 2007 In 1950, Quine inaugurated a strange new way of talking about philosophy. The hallmark of this approach is a propensity to take ordinary colloquial
Introduction to Philosophy PHL 221, York College Revised, Spring 2017 Beginnings of Philosophy: Overview of Course (1) The Origins of Philosophy and Relativism Knowledge Are you a self? Ethics: What is
S E V E N T H E X C U R S U S Varieties of Apriority T he notions of a priori knowledge and justification play a central role in this work. There are many ways in which one can understand the a priori,
Key Words Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge Empiricism, skepticism, personal identity, necessary connection, causal connection, induction, impressions, ideas. DAVID HUME (1711-76) is one of the
2 Why Truthmakers GONZALO RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA 1. INTRODUCTION Consider a certain red rose. The proposition that the rose is red is true because the rose is red. One might say as well that the proposition
1. The Scope of Skepticism Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument The scope of skeptical challenges can vary in a number
International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS) A Peer-Reviewed Monthly Research Journal ISSN: 2394-7969 (Online), ISSN: 2394-7950 (Print) ISJN: A4372-3144 (Online)
Think by Simon Blackburn Chapter 7b The World Kant s metaphysics rested on identifying a kind of truth that Hume and other did not acknowledge. It is called A. synthetic a priori B. analytic a priori C.
Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2011 Class 28 - May 5 First Antinomy On the Ontological Argument Marcus, Modern Philosophy, Slide 1 Business P
Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism? Author: Terence Rajivan Edward, University of Manchester. Abstract. In the sixth chapter of The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel attempts to identify a form of idealism.
Wittgenstein s Logical Atomism Seminar 8 PHIL2120 Topics in Analytic Philosophy 16 November 2012 1 Admin Required reading for this seminar: Soames, Ch 9+10 New Schedule: 23 November: The Tractarian Test
24 Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Abstract: In this paper, I address Linda Zagzebski s analysis of the relation between moral testimony and understanding arguing that Aquinas
Philosophy 3100: Ethical Theory Topic 2 - Non-Cognitivism: I. What is Non-Cognitivism? II. The Motivational Judgment Internalist Argument for Non-Cognitivism III. Why Ayer Is A Non-Cognitivist a. The Analytic/Synthetic
Rationalism I. Descartes (1596-1650) A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt 1. How could one be certain in the absence of religious guidance and trustworthy senses
3 Comments on Carl Ginet s Self-Evidence Juan Comesaña* There is much in Ginet s paper to admire. In particular, it is the clearest exposition that I know of a view of the a priori based on the idea that
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
Dean W. Zimmerman / Oxford Studies in Metaphysics - Volume 2 12-Zimmerman-chap12 Page Proof page 357 19.10.2005 2:50pm 12. A Theistic Argument against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine
Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge Colorado State University BIBLID [0873-626X (2012) 33; pp. 459-467] Abstract According to rationalists about moral knowledge, some moral truths are knowable a
On the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system Floris T. van Vugt University College Utrecht University, The Netherlands October 22, 2003 Abstract The main question
Meeting of the Aristotelian Society held at Senate House, University of London, on 22 October 2012 at 5:30 p.m. II RESEMBLANCE NOMINALISM, CONJUNCTIONS AND TRUTHMAKERS The resemblance nominalist says that
DO SENSE EXPERIENTIAL STATES HAVE CONCEPTUAL CONTENT? BILL BREWER My thesis in this paper is: (CC) Sense experiential states have conceptual content. I take it for granted that sense experiential states
Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Module - 20 Lecture - 20 Critical Philosophy: Kant s objectives
Overview Is there a priori knowledge? Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? No: Mill, Quine Yes: faculty of a priori intuition (Rationalism, Kant) No: all a priori knowledge analytic (Ayer) No A Priori
ANAL63-3 4/15/2003 2:40 PM Page 221 Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts Alexander Bird 1. Introduction In his (2002) Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra provides a powerful articulation of the claim that Resemblance
Excerpt from J. Garvey, The Twenty Greatest Philosophy Books (Continuum, 2007): Immanuel Kant s Critique of Pure Reason In a letter to Moses Mendelssohn, Kant says this about the Critique of Pure Reason:
1 Faith and Philosophy, April (2006), 191-200. Penultimate Draft DE SE KNOWLEDGE AND THE POSSIBILITY OF AN OMNISCIENT BEING Stephan Torre In this paper I examine an argument that has been made by Patrick
96 Universal and Particular INTRODUCTION ON such speculative problems as the existence of God, the immortality of the soul, the infinity of time and space, or the limits of human knowledge, the conversation
Précis of Empiricism and Experience Anil Gupta University of Pittsburgh My principal aim in the book is to understand the logical relationship of experience to knowledge. Say that I look out of my window
2 3 Philosophy 2 3 : Intuitions and Philosophy Fall 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 4 - The Myth of the Given I. Atomism and Analysis In our last class, on logical empiricism, we saw that Wittgenstein
CHAPTER E I G H T Bill Brewer Does Perceptual Experience Have Conceptual Content? Perceptual Experience Has Conceptual Content My thesis in this essay is: (CC) Sense experiential states have conceptual
1 Conventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth 1.1 Introduction Quine s work on analyticity, translation, and reference has sweeping philosophical implications. In his first important philosophical
Lee Anne Detzel PHI 8338 Revised: November 1, 2004 The Middle Path: A Case for the Philosophical Theologian Leo Strauss roots the vitality of Western civilization in the ongoing conflict between philosophy
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Philosophy and Phenomenological Research doi: 10.1111/phpr.12129 2014 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC Anti-Metaphysicalism, Necessity, and Temporal
P. Weingartner, God s existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas, Ontos, Frankfurt 2010. Pp. 116. Thinking of the problem of God s existence, most formal logicians