Some Transition Words and Phrases
|
|
- Marilynn Davis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Some Transition Words and Phrases Addition Time Capturing Authorial Action Contrast Frequency additionally again along with also among other things and, and then another after afterwards and then as soon as at length at that time before by and by acknowledges adds admits agrees allows analyzes answers argues emphasizes endorses express find grants identifies illustrates implies after all although and yet anyhow but conversely despite commonly consistently frequently often now and then sometimes Concession by the same token directly asserts insists even though admittedly besides earlier believes interprets for all that granted equally important eventually celebrates maintains however I agree that charges notes in contrast Although it is true that first of all henceforth claims objects instead (of) of course further immediately comments observes just the same there is no question that furthermore in the meantime compares offers on the contrary to be sure in addition later (on) complains points out on the other hand without doubt in like manner meanwhile concedes proposes nevertheless even though in the first place next confirms questions nonetheless undoubtedly in the same way now contends reasons otherwise I concede that lastly presently criticizes refutes still occasionaly likewise shortly declares rejects whereas moreover since demonstrates reminds us yet Elaboration next soon deplores reports though not only but also subsequently describes responds in spite of actually similarly thereafter denies shows while by extension then too whereupon discuss states in short disputes stresses that is does not deny suggests in other words thinks to put it another way urges to put it bluntly writes to put it succinctly ultimately Intensity Examples Order Place Repetition certainly in any event in fact indeed most of all naturally of course the point is to be sure truly while keeping in mind a case in point for example consider the following for instance to cite a case to illustrate as an illustration for instance specifically consequently first in conclusion in the first place more importantly next second (secondly) then to begin with above adjacent below beside beyond contiguous here next to on the right opposite to the right nearby again as above as mentioned as noted in other words that is then too to be sure let me repeat I repeat that is to say while keeping in mind Latin ad absurdum to the point of absurdity - ad hominem-- appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect; attacking an opponent's character rather than answer contention. ad infinitum without limit or end a fortiori with more convincing force, more convincingly, similar to undoubtedly i.e. that is, in other words. e.g. for example qua-as Useful words for argumentation, theorization predicate operationalize perennial antagonisms trivialize contemporaneous simultaneously inscribe popularization intersection transcend elusive constituent predisposed restore reinvent constellation denaturalize situated located displace destabilize intensification
2 - non sequitur-- a statement that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said par excellence the best of its kind; preeminent sin qua non something essential per se in itself, as such - a priori formed or conceived beforehand; deductive; reasoning derived by self-evidence; presumptive - a posteriori from the latter; inductive; reasoning from observed facts - ad hoc--for a particular end or case at hand without wider consideration de facto-in reality; actually; from the fact ergo-therefore - mutatis mutandis with the respective differences having been considered; with necessary changes having been made - vis a vis face to face; in relation to; as compared to contradictio in adiecto contradiction in terms (oxymoran deafening silence) accordingly all in all altogether as a result clearly consequently it follows that for this reason hence namely then therefore thereupon thus indicative of representative of tensions paradoxes, contradictions refurbish premise penetration intelligibility logic intensify prevaricate exaggerate, hyperbole, embellishment, misrepresents, falsehood politicize received wisdom essentialize contingent normalize reductive coterminous pivotal Result Summary Comparison Purpose in brief for this end in short for this purpose in sum in order that on the whole in order to to summarize to this end to sum up with this in mind therefore with this object as correspondingly in like manner in the same way just as likewise similarly with regard to incidentally argumentation towards a methodology dialectic two extreme views as unity definitional creating terms creating a dialogue arguable claims: - issues of definition (of an object, event, person) - issues of causation - issues of evaluation - issues of recommendation - reason, authority, emotion avoid logical fallacies (errors in reasoning) - false premises o overreaching to make point o generalizations - irrelevance o red herring (beside the point) o ad hominem attacks - ambiguity o begging the question o strawman o weak analogy - bandwagon (ad populum) suggesting agreement because it is popular - begging the question using circular reasoning to prove a conclusion - red herring saying something that distracts from the issue - slippery slope suggesting that one event will automatically lead to a chain of events - post hoc arguing that one even caused another when they are unrelated - tu quoque improperly turning an accusation back on the accuser Critiques reductionism positivism naïve empiricism mechanistic reification economism Introducing quotations Explaining Quotations Adding Metacommentary
3 - X states - As the prominent philosopher x puts it - According to X - X himself writes - In her book,, X maintains that... - Writing in the journal X complains that - In X s view - X agrees when she writes - X disagrees when he writes - X complicates matter further when he writes - Basically, X is saying - In other words, X believes - In making this comment, X urges us to - X is corroborating the age-old adage that - X s point is that - The essence of X s argument is that - In other words, - What really means by this is - Ultimately, my goal is to demonstrate - My point is not, but - To put it another way - In sum, then, - My conclusion, then, is that - In short, - Incidentally - By the way, - Chapter 2 explores, while Chapter 3 examines - Having just argued that, let us not turn our attention to - Although some readers may object that, I should answer that Introducing what they say (adapted from Graff) - A number of have recently suggested that - It has become common today to dismiss - In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques of for _ Making what they say something you say - I ve always believed that _ - When I was a child, I used to think that _ - Although I should know better by now, I cannot help thinking that _ - At the same time that I believe, I also believe _ Introducing standard views - Americans today tend to believe that _ - Conventional wisdom has it that _ - Common sense seems to dictate that _ - The standard way of thinking about topic X has it that _ - It is often said _ - My whole life I have heard it said that _ - Many people assume that _ Introducing something implied or assumed - Although none of them have ever said so directly, my teachers have often given me the impression that _ - One implication of X s treatment of is that _ - Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that _ - While they rarely admit as much, often take for granted that_ Introducing an ongoing debate - In discussion of X, one controversial issue has been_ On the one hand, argues_ On the other had, contends_ Others even maintain _ My own view is _ - When it come to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that _ Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of _ Whereas some are convinced that, others maintain that _ - In conclusion, then, as I suggested earlier, defenders of can t have it both ways. Their assertion that is contradicted by their claim that _ Disagreeing, with reasons - I think X is mistaken because she overlooks - X s claim that rests upon the questionable assumption that - I disagree with X s view that because, as recent research has shown - X contradicts herself when she argues that - X can t have it both ways. On the one hand, she argues On the other hand, she also says - By focusing on X overlooks the deeper problem of - This side of the argument escapes X s attention Agreeing with a difference - I agree that because my experience confirms it. - X surely is right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that - X s theory of is extremely useful because is sheds insight on the difficult problem of - Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that it basically boils down to - I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing so many people believe - If group X is right that, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular assumption that
4 Agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously - Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that - Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that - Though I concede that, I still insist that - Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convinces me that instead. - X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that - While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that - I m of two minds about X s claim that On the one hand, I agree that On the other hand, I m not sure if - My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support X s position that, but I find Y s argument about and Z s research on to be equally persuasive. Embedding Voice Markers - X overlooks what I consider an important point about - My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a - I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls - These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that Naming Your Naysayers - Here many feminist would probably object - But social Darwinist would certainly take issue with the argument that - Biologists, of course, may want to question whether - Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm X will probably argue that - Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that - Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it s hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that Making Concession While Still Standing Your Ground - Although I grant that, I still maintain that - Proponents of X are right to argue that But they exaggerate when they claim that - While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that - On the one hand, I agree with X that But on the other hand, I still insist that Signaling Who is Saying What - According to both X and Y - Politicians, X argues, should - Most athletes will tell you - My own view, however, is that - I agree, as X may not realize, that - But are real and arguably, the most significant factor in - But X is wrong that - However, it is simply not true that - Indeed, it is highly likely that - X s assertion that does not fit the facts. - X is right that - X is wrong that - X is both right and wrong that - Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals - Nevertheless, new research shows - Anyone familiar with should agree that Entertaining Objections - At this point I would like to raise some objections inspired by the skeptic in me. She feels that I have been ignoring, she says to me, - Yet some readers may challenge the view that - Of course, many will disagree with this assertion that Introducing Objections Informally - But is my proposal realistic? What are the chances of its actually being adopted? - Yet is it always true that? Is it always the case, as I have been suggesting, that? - However, does the evidence I ve cited prove conclusively that? - Impossible, some will say. You must be reading the research selectively. Indicating Who Cares - used to thing But recently [or within the past few decades] suggests that - These findings challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that - Recent studies like these shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed. - Researchers have long assumed that For instance, one eminent scholar of cell biology, assumed in, her seminal work on cell structures and functions, that fat cells As herself put it,. Another leading scientist,, argued that fat cells. Ultimately, when it came to the nature of fat, the basic assumption was that But a new body of research shows that fat cells are far more complex and that - If sports enthusiasts stopped to think about it, many of them might simply assume that the most successful athletes However, new research shows - These findings challenge neoliberals commons assumptions that - At first glance, teenagers appear to But upon closer
5 inspection Establishing Why Your Claims Matter - X matters/is important because - Although X may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over - Ultimately, what is at stake here is - These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of - My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of - These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in - Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about Comparing Two or More Studies Findings - Our data support/confirm/verify the work of X by showing that - By demonstrating, X s work extends the finding of Y. - The results of X contradict/refute Y s conclusion that - X s findings call into question the widely accepted theory that - Our data are consistent with X s hypothesis that Explaining an Experimental Result - One explanation for X s findings of is that An alternative explanation is - The difference between and is probably due to Introducing Gaps in the Existing Research - Studies of X have indicated. It is not clear, however, that this conclusion applies to - often take for granted that Few have investigated this assumption, however. - X s work tells us a great deal about Can this work be generalized to?
Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say
Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say Introducing What They Say A number of have recently suggested that. It has become common today to dismiss. In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques
More informationIndex of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say. Introducing Standard Views
Index of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say A number of sociologists have recently suggested that X s work has several fundamental problems.
More informationTemplates for Research Paper
Templates for Research Paper Templates for introducing what they say A number of have recently suggested that. It has become common today to dismiss. In their recent work, have offered harsh critiques
More informationTemplates for Writing about Ideas and Research
Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research One of the more difficult aspects of writing an argument based on research is establishing your position in the ongoing conversation about the topic. The
More informationACADEMIC SKILLS PROGRAM STUDENT SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT
TEMPLATES FOR ACADEMIC CONVERSATION (Balancing sources and your own thoughts) *The following templates and suggestions are taken from the text They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein, published
More informationTHEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying
School of Liberal Arts University Writing Center Because writers need readers Cavanaugh Hall 427 University Library 2125 (317)274-2049 (317)278-8171 www.iupui.edu/~uwc Academic Conversation Templates:
More informationTemplates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Templates for Making what they say something you Say
Templates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Americans today tend to believe that.. Conventional wisdom has it that Common sense seems to dictate that.. The standard way of thinking
More informationBASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS
BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS 1 PATTERNS FOR SAYING WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING Part I: Ways to introduce standard views These offer a way to bring up a topic about a view so widely accepted that is it basically
More informationSome Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.
Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches
More informationWriting the Persuasive Essay
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasive/argument essay? In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to convince the reader to believe or do something Persuasive
More informationHalliday and Hasan in Cohesion in English (1976) see text connectedness realized by:
Halliday and Hasan in Cohesion in English (1976) see text connectedness realized by: Reference Linguistic elements related by what they refer to: Jan lives near the pub. He often goes there. Demonstrative
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More informationArgument. What is it? How do I make a good one?
Argument What is it? How do I make a good one? Argument Vs Persuasion Everything s an argument, really. Argument: appeals strictly by reason and logic Persuasion: logic and emotion The forum of your argument
More informationQuestions for Critically Reading an Argument
ARGUMENT Questions for Critically Reading an Argument What claims does the writer make? What kinds and quality of evidence does the writer provide to support the claim? What assumptions underlie the argument,
More informationStudy Guide: Academic Writing
Within your essay you will be hoping to demonstrate or prove something. You will have a point of view that you wish to convey to your reader. In order to do this, there are academic conventions that need
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationFROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS
FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR READERS INFLUENCES HOW YOU SEE A PARTICULAR SITUATION DEFINE AN ISSUE EXPLAIN THE ONGOING
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationA R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N
ARGUMENTS IN ACTION Descriptions: creates a textual/verbal account of what something is, was, or could be (shape, size, colour, etc.) Used to give you or your audience a mental picture of the world around
More informationLogical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS
Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS Rhetorical Appeals Ethos Appeals to credibility Pathos Appeals to emotion Logos Appeals to logic Structure of an Analysis/Argument Arguments operate under logic Your
More informationThesis Statements. (and their purposes)
Thesis Statements (and their purposes) What is a Thesis? Statement expressing the claim or point you will make about your subject Answers the question: What is the main idea that I m trying to present
More informationAND YET. IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it DETERMINE WHO IS SAYING WHAT IN THE TEXTS YOU READ
FIVE AND YET Distinguishing What You Say from What They Say IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it is extremely important that readers be able to tell at every
More informationMulti-Paragraph Essay
Multi-Paragraph Essay It must contain the following elements: 1. Hook: 1-2 Sentences 2. Transition: 1-2 Sentences 3. Thesis Statement: 1 Sentence The Introduction The Hook needs to grab your reader s attention.
More information5 A Modal Version of the
5 A Modal Version of the Ontological Argument E. J. L O W E Moreland, J. P.; Sweis, Khaldoun A.; Meister, Chad V., Jul 01, 2013, Debating Christian Theism The original version of the ontological argument
More informationLOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16
LOGIC Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations
More informationDoes the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:
Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore I argue that Moore s famous response to the skeptic should be accepted even by the skeptic. My paper has three main stages. First, I will briefly outline G. E.
More informationLecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments
Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments 1 Agenda 1. Reductio Ad Absurdum 2. Burden of Proof 3. Argument by Analogy 4. Bad Forms of Arguments 1. Begging the Question
More informationFallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.
Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking. A good argument should: 1. be deductively valid (or inductively strong) and have all true premises; 2. have its validity and truth-of-premises be as evident
More informationArgument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals
Argument and Persuasion Stating Opinions and Proposals The Method It all starts with an opinion - something that people can agree or disagree with. The Method Move to action Speak your mind Convince someone
More informationAyer and Quine on the a priori
Ayer and Quine on the a priori November 23, 2004 1 The problem of a priori knowledge Ayer s book is a defense of a thoroughgoing empiricism, not only about what is required for a belief to be justified
More information[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW
[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts (2 vols.; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). xxxviii + 1172 pp. Hbk. US$59.99. Craig Keener
More informationThe Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion
24.251: Philosophy of Language Paper 2: S.A. Kripke, On Rules and Private Language 21 December 2011 The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages,
More informationLanguage Supports for Argument Writing
Language Support for Stating an Explicit Claim Language Supports for Argument Writing (The author/speaker) Adverbs strongly adamantly forcefully passionately firmly sternly completely absolutely vehemently
More informationLecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.
TOPIC: Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments. KEY TERMS/ GOALS: Cosmological argument. The problem of Infinite Regress.
More informationThree Ways to Respond
FOUR YES / NO / OKAY, BUT Three Ways to Respond OUR FIRST THREE chapters discuss the they say stage of writing, in which you devote your attention to the views of some other person or group. In this chapter
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More information! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay
Prep Writing Persuasive Essay Purpose: The writer will learn how to effectively plan, draft, and compose a persuasive essay using the writing process. Objectives: The learner will: Demonstrate an understanding
More informationAdapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument
Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey Counter-Argument When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis
More informationFallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.
Fallacies 1. Hasty generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or too small). Stereotypes about
More informationMarcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction
RBL 09/2004 Collins, C. John Science & Faith: Friends or Foe? Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2003. Pp. 448. Paper. $25.00. ISBN 1581344309. Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC
More informationPhilosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI
Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI Precising definition Theoretical definition Persuasive definition Syntactic definition Operational definition 1. Are questions about defining a phrase
More information2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature
Introduction The philosophical controversy about free will and determinism is perennial. Like many perennial controversies, this one involves a tangle of distinct but closely related issues. Thus, the
More informationDavid O Connor. Hume on Religion H. O. Mounce Hume Studies Volume XXVIII, Number 2 (November, 2002)
David O Connor. Hume on Religion H. O. Mounce Hume Studies Volume XXVIII, Number 2 (November, 2002) 309-313. Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES Terms and Conditions
More informationIn Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg
1 In Search of the Ontological Argument Richard Oxenberg Abstract We can attend to the logic of Anselm's ontological argument, and amuse ourselves for a few hours unraveling its convoluted word-play, or
More informationI. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.
Basics of Argument and Rhetoric Although arguing, speaking our minds, and getting our points across are common activities for most of us, applying specific terminology to these activities may not seem
More information3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.
Body Paragraphs Notes W1: Argumentative Writing a. Claim Statement Introduce precise claim Paragraph Structure organization that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons,
More informationBy J. Alexander Rutherford. Part one sets the roles, relationships, and begins the discussion with a consideration
An Outline of David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion An outline of David Hume s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion By J. Alexander Rutherford I. Introduction Part one sets the roles, relationships,
More informationArguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),
Doc Holley s Logical Fallacies In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise
More informationAquinas' Third Way Modalized
Philosophy of Religion Aquinas' Third Way Modalized Robert E. Maydole Davidson College bomaydole@davidson.edu ABSTRACT: The Third Way is the most interesting and insightful of Aquinas' five arguments for
More informationLet s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)
Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO (aka Dihydrogen monoxide) DHMO.org Dihydrogen-monoxide (Transtronics site) Coalition to Ban DHMO Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide! DHMO Chemical Danger Alert - The Horror
More informationSelections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5
Lesson Seventeen The Conditional Syllogism Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5 It is clear then that the ostensive syllogisms are effected by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations
More informationOverview: Application: What to Avoid:
UNIT 3: BUILDING A BASIC ARGUMENT While "argument" has a number of different meanings, college-level arguments typically involve a few fundamental pieces that work together to construct an intelligent,
More informationThe Argumentative Essay
The Argumentative Essay but what is the difference between an argument and a quarrel? Academic argumentation is based on logical, structured evidence that attempts the reader to accept an opinion, take
More informationMistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May
Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle Evan E. May Part 1: The Issue A significant question arising from the discipline of philosophy concerns the nature of the mind. What constitutes
More informationTWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW
DISCUSSION NOTE BY CAMPBELL BROWN JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY DISCUSSION NOTE MAY 2015 URL: WWW.JESP.ORG COPYRIGHT CAMPBELL BROWN 2015 Two Versions of Hume s Law MORAL CONCLUSIONS CANNOT VALIDLY
More informationVarsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26
Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26 Session will discuss on how to refute arguments more effectively. Tim Cook Salado High School Tim.cook@saladoisd.org Attention All Attendees:
More informationPlease visit our website for other great titles:
First printing: July 2010 Copyright 2010 by Jason Lisle. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher, except
More informationMPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your
More informationFr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God
Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher) Copleston:
More informationTake Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert
PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert Name: Date: Take Home Exam #1 Instructions Answer as many questions as you are able to. Please write your answers clearly in the blanks provided.
More informationCommon Logical Fallacies
Common Logical Fallacies Effective arguments rely on logic and facts for support, yet speakers and authors, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can mislead an audience with a flaw in reasoning. Readers
More informationWHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.
WHAT IS HUME S FORK? www.prshockley.org Certainty does not exist in science. I. Introduction: A. Hume divides all objects of human reason into two different kinds: Relation of Ideas & Matters of Fact.
More informationLogical (formal) fallacies
Fallacies in academic writing Chad Nilep There are many possible sources of fallacy an idea that is mistakenly thought to be true, even though it may be untrue in academic writing. The phrase logical fallacy
More informationBut we may go further: not only Jones, but no actual man, enters into my statement. This becomes obvious when the statement is false, since then
CHAPTER XVI DESCRIPTIONS We dealt in the preceding chapter with the words all and some; in this chapter we shall consider the word the in the singular, and in the next chapter we shall consider the word
More informationNote: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is
The Flicker of Freedom: A Reply to Stump Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is scheduled to appear in an upcoming issue The Journal of Ethics. That
More informationThe Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)
The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments) Adapted from: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments: Learn the lost art of making sense by Ali Almossawi *Not, by any stretch of the imagination,
More informationIntroduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )
Philosophical Proof of God: Derived from Principles in Bernard Lonergan s Insight May 2014 Robert J. Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D. Magis Center of Reason and Faith Lonergan s proof may be stated as follows: Introduction
More informationFallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope
Fallacies in logic Hasty Generalization Definition: Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate (usually because it is atypical or just too small). Stereotypes
More informationCritique of Cosmological Argument
David Hume: Critique of Cosmological Argument Critique of Cosmological Argument DAVID HUME (1711-1776) David Hume is one of the most important philosophers in the history of philosophy. Born in Edinburgh,
More informationThe Question of Metaphysics
The Question of Metaphysics metaphysics seriously. Second, I want to argue that the currently popular hands-off conception of metaphysical theorising is unable to provide a satisfactory answer to the question
More informationRationalist-Irrationalist Dialectic in Buddhism:
Rationalist-Irrationalist Dialectic in Buddhism: The Failure of Buddhist Epistemology By W. J. Whitman The problem of the one and the many is the core issue at the heart of all real philosophical and theological
More information2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions
National Qualifications 06 06 Philosophy Higher Finalised Marking Instructions Scottish Qualifications Authority 06 The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications only
More informationReading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading
Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading Developed by Jamie A. Hughes, South Campus Learning Center, Communications Lab 04-25-05 Permission to copy and use is granted to all FCCJ staff provided this
More informationChapter 13: Argument Convincing Others
Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others Argument or quarrel? Many people would ask, What s the difference? To them, the two terms convey the same meaning, both calling to mind two angry people, shouting,
More informationDoes Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?
Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction? We argue that, if deduction is taken to at least include classical logic (CL, henceforth), justifying CL - and thus deduction
More informationReading and Evaluating Arguments
Reading and Evaluating Arguments Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments To recognize errors in logical reasoning An argument
More informationHow To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA
How To Recognize and Avoid Them Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA Fallacies are logical errors that weaken arguments Commonplace Can be persuasive to the uninformed Can be driven by agendas or strong
More informationOSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5 May 14th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Commentary pm Krabbe Dale Jacquette Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive
More informationThis fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.
So what do fallacies look like? For each fallacy listed, there is a definition or explanation, an example, and a tip on how to avoid committing the fallacy in your own arguments. Hasty generalization Definition:
More informationThe Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism
The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism Issues: I. Problem of Induction II. Popper s rejection of induction III. Salmon s critique of deductivism 2 I. The problem of induction 1. Inductive vs.
More informationSpinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS. by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M.
Spinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M. Elwes PART I: CONCERNING GOD DEFINITIONS (1) By that which is self-caused
More informationSearle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan)
Searle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan) : Searle says of Chalmers book, The Conscious Mind, "it is one thing to bite the occasional bullet here and there, but this book consumes
More informationAn Alternate Possibility for the Compatibility of Divine. Foreknowledge and Free Will. Alex Cavender. Ringstad Paper Junior/Senior Division
An Alternate Possibility for the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Free Will Alex Cavender Ringstad Paper Junior/Senior Division 1 An Alternate Possibility for the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge
More information10 CERTAINTY G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS
10 170 I am at present, as you can all see, in a room and not in the open air; I am standing up, and not either sitting or lying down; I have clothes on, and am not absolutely naked; I am speaking in a
More informationPHI 1700: Global Ethics
PHI 1700: Global Ethics Session 2 February 4th, 2016 All About Arguments (Philosophy Basics) 1 What is an argument? Arguments are like the currency of philosophy: they are what philosophers exchange to
More informationPutnam: Meaning and Reference
Putnam: Meaning and Reference The Traditional Conception of Meaning combines two assumptions: Meaning and psychology Knowing the meaning (of a word, sentence) is being in a psychological state. Even Frege,
More informationHUME'S THEORY. THE question which I am about to discuss is this. Under what circumstances
Chapter V HUME'S THEORY THE question which I am about to discuss is this. Under what circumstances (if any) does a man, when he believes a proposition, not merely believe it but also absolutely know that
More informationBaha i Proofs for the Existence of God
Page 1 Baha i Proofs for the Existence of God Ian Kluge to show that belief in God can be rational and logically coherent and is not necessarily a product of uncritical religious dogmatism or ignorance.
More informationSufficient Reason and Infinite Regress: Causal Consistency in Descartes and Spinoza. Ryan Steed
Sufficient Reason and Infinite Regress: Causal Consistency in Descartes and Spinoza Ryan Steed PHIL 2112 Professor Rebecca Car October 15, 2018 Steed 2 While both Baruch Spinoza and René Descartes espouse
More informationAsking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley A Decision Making and Support Systems Perspective by Richard Day M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley look to change
More information2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.
Lecture 8: Refutation Philosophy 130 October 25 & 27, 2016 O Rourke I. Administrative A. Schedule see syllabus as well! B. Questions? II. Refutation A. Arguments are typically used to establish conclusions.
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies 1 Learning Outcomes In this lesson we will: 1.Define logical fallacy using the SEE-I. 2.Understand and apply the concept of relevance. 3.Define,
More informationLeibniz, Principles, and Truth 1
Leibniz, Principles, and Truth 1 Leibniz was a man of principles. 2 Throughout his writings, one finds repeated assertions that his view is developed according to certain fundamental principles. Attempting
More informationDirect Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)
Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000) One of the advantages traditionally claimed for direct realist theories of perception over indirect realist theories is that the
More informationPhilosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism
Michael Huemer on Skepticism Philosophy 3340 - Epistemology Topic 3 - Skepticism Chapter II. The Lure of Radical Skepticism 1. Mike Huemer defines radical skepticism as follows: Philosophical skeptics
More informationWolfgang Spohn Fachbereich Philosophie Universität Konstanz D Konstanz
CHANGING CONCEPTS * Wolfgang Spohn Fachbereich Philosophie Universität Konstanz D 78457 Konstanz At the beginning of his paper (2004), Nenad Miscevic said that empirical concepts have not received the
More informationIs the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?
Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible? Anders Kraal ABSTRACT: Since the 1960s an increasing number of philosophers have endorsed the thesis that there can be no such thing as
More informationAsk Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?
Writing a Thesis Statement 7 th Grade English Argument Essay Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?
More informationA CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment
A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE A Paper Presented to Dr. Douglas Blount Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for PHREL 4313 by Billy Marsh October 20,
More informationTheory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?
Theory of Knowledge 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree? Candidate Name: Syed Tousif Ahmed Candidate Number: 006644 009
More information